Author: Health Freedom Idaho

  • Amish Grandfather making herbal salves: Life Sentence Postponed

    Let’s be clear about a couple of pertinent facts:

    1. The FDA made up arbitrary rules, then accused Sam of breaking those rules.

    2. There are no victims. Samuel Girod has hurt no one.

    3. FDA-approved pharmaceutical drugs kill 1 person every 19 minutes. Merck’s FDA-approved Vioxx killed over 68,000 people. Nobody in Big Pharma goes to jail. They pay out billions in fines (after making billions in profits.) No companies close, nobody goes to jail. Nobody. Even after killing and harming 100s of thousands of people.

    4. Sam Girod and his products have hurt no one.

    READ THE FULL STORY from Kentucky Free Press http://www.kyfreepress.com/2017/03/fda-v-sam-girod-complete-story-video/

    Summarized Version posted by HFI: https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/amish-father-to-be-imprisoned-for-40-plus-years-for-selling-natural-skin-salves-made-from-herbs

    Update on sentencing: 

    SENTENCING WAS POSTPONED June 30 Sam waits in jail

  • #FluorideFree

    Unlike other chemicals added to water, which are intended to treat the water itself, fluoride is intended to treat the people who drink the water, whether they want the treatment or not. There is NO HEALTH BENEFIT IN INGESTING FLUORIDE, only risks. SIGN THE PETITION:

    *Fluoride is toxic waste from aluminum and fertilizer factories and contains a high concentration of toxins and heavy metals such as arsenic, lead and chromium. All proven to be carcinogens. 

    *Fluoride is now classified as a neurotoxin as supported by more than 180 studies. 

    *Fluoride’s impact is cumulative. It is more poisonous than lead and just slightly less poisonous than arsenic. No one will die from drinking one glass of fluoridated water, but it is the long term chronic effects of drinking fluoridated water that affects health. 

    At Health Freedom Idaho, our view is that we should each have the right to determine what medicines we intake – or don’t. 

    -Dr. Charles Gordon Heyd, Past President of the American Medical Association.

    “I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs. Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious effects on a long range basis. Any attempt to use water this way is deplorable.”

    DO YOU HAVE FLUORIDE added to your water? 

    WE AGREE – IDAHO SHOULD BE FLUORIDE FREE! SIGN THE PETITION: 

    Z1znK5nQdVMFwWgZKb2A_waterIdahofluoridefree.png

    RESOURCES FOR RESEARCH: http://healthfreedomidaho.flutter.co/fluoride-just-when-you-thought-it-was-safe-to-drink-the-water

  • SIDS

    ” Guys, my heart is broken….one of my old friends from years ago had a 4 month old baby that was born days before my son.
    She vaccinated her son…..I begged her not to but she was hard headed.
    Her son had a pediatrician appointment 2 days ago.
    He got his 4 month vaccines. She kissed him goodnight and when she woke up, he had left this world to be with the angels.”

    I searched through the comments on her post, of parents who were both angry and sad… I found it. The cause of death? It was recorded as “SIDS”.

    KNOW THIS: Vaccines are pretty much NEVER considered as a potential culprit in the death of a child. It is wholeheartedly, ignorantly, assumed and blindly believed that vaccines are perfectly safe, and more often than not, the medical professionals will vehemently defend the vaccines if they are questioned… To voice the idea, that just maybe, the neurotoxic, hepatotoxic, and immunotoxic substances in the vaccines could possibly have caused this…? They will shut you down and assure you that there’s zero possibility. There was even a case where healthy twin infants both died, simultaneously, two days post-vaccination, and it was documented as “SIDS”.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17654772/

    What we know: SIDS occurs most often at 2, 4, and 6 months of age… when several vaccines (typically 7-8 vaccines) are administered all at once, and research has shown that an infant is nearly 8x more likely to die within *three days* following vaccination with pertussis, compared to 30 days later.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/

    SIDS. This is what is documented when the cause of death is unknown. Essentially, this is what the medical professionals are saying:

    “We have no clue what caused this healthy baby to suddenly die, even though this baby received vaccines for 8 different diseases today/yesterday/just a few days ago, but because we have been assured that vaccines are safe (yet have no clue what is actually *in* them, nor how those substances affect the body), it’s definitely NOT the vaccines, we ‘know’ that for sure…”

    In 2015 statistics were gathered resulting in a 23 page report of 100’s of children are reported dead after vaccines labeled SIDS. 

    Some little known facts about SIDS…

    -Did you know that the term “SIDS” or “sudden infant death syndrome” was not termed by the medical community until shortly after vaccines were introduced in the 1960s? Not a coincidence…

    -Did you know that cases of SIDS occurs most frequently at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months of age (when vaccines are administered)? Not a coincidence…

    -Did you know that the first vaccine, Hepatitis B, is given on the first day of life contains the known neurotoxin aluminum? The U.S leads the developed world in first-day newborn death. Not a coincidence…

    -Did you know that the U.S has the highest infant mortality rate in the world and also has the most aggressive vaccination program? Not a coincidence…

    -Did you know that Mississippi has the highest vaccination rate (99.9% compliance) and also the highest rate of SIDS in the country? Again, not a coincidence.

    portions of this article are from https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1418759231479042&id=100000349373954

  • When good hygiene comes with a dose of toxins

    HFI: Did you brush your teeth? Did you wash your hands? As moms we ask this to our children about 10 times a day. Depending on the toothpaste and soap your using, you could actually be exposing yourselves to toxic, hormone disrupting triclosan. Here is a pertinent article on the toxin and how to avoid it from EWG. 

    The chemical was once widely used in these and other personal care products as an antimicrobial agent. Many companies, including Johnson & Johnson and Proctor & Gamble, have removed it from products in recent years. Last year, the federal Food and Drug Administration finally banned triclosan from hand soap, an action for which EWG has long been advocating. But it is still allowed as an ingredient in toothpaste and other consumer products. Colgate continues to use it unnecessarily in its toothpaste.    

    A study by Brown University researchers, published in May in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, provided some startling evidence about just how much of the chemical can wind up in the bodies of pregnant women, babies and young children.

    Scientists tested urine samples of 389 mothers and their children – mothers were tested three times during pregnancy and children were tested periodically between the ages of 1 and 8. The results show that the levels of triclosan in children’s bodies increased as they got older, almost certainly from increased use of both toothpaste and hand soap. Children who washed their hands more than five times a day had levels of triclosan in their urine that were four times higher than those of children who reported washing their hands once a day.

    Children who had their urine tested within a day of brushing their teeth had levels 2.5 times higher than those who did not.

    In 2008, EWG found triclosan and 15 other toxic chemicals in the blood and urine of 20 teen girls from eight states and the District of Columbia.

     In a separate report from the same year, EWG assembled a list of all the products in which triclosan was approved for use.

    Here are a few tips from EWG for people interested in avoiding exposure to triclosan.

  • Eating Out? First Visit The Eat Well Guide

    HFI: What a wonderful resource to eating well wherever you are! These days, it’s hard to trust that the food you’re eating was produced in a safe, humane and sustainable manner. From their site: “We built the Eat Well Guide to make it easier to find good food and to support local farmers, restaurateurs and others who are doing their best by their customers, their workers and the planet. We personally vet every business that goes into the Guide, and we never charge or accept money in exchange for inclusion.”

    The Guide’s thousands of listings include restaurants, farms, farmers’ markets, stores and more. Search by location and/or category, or check out our city guides to find tailored listings for restaurants and other sustainable vendors in cities across the US.

    Visit the Eat Well Guide

    We’ve set out to map the sustainable food system. We can do a lot on our own, but we can go further, faster, with help from people like you all over the country. If you know of a sustainable business that should be listed in the Guide, please tell us! You can also use the “Help Improve This Listing” button to let us know about any errors, or to flag a business if you don’t think it belongs in the Eat Well Guide.

    Standards for Inclusion

    Sustainable agriculture means producing food using farming techniques that protect the environment, public health, human communities and animal welfare. This allows farmers to supply healthful food without compromising future generations’ ability to do the same. The Eat Well Guide includes sustainable farms, along with restaurants, markets and other businesses that offer sustain-ably produced foods.

    Our Process

    The Eat Well Guide is a labor of love – it’s a nonprofit endeavor and has always been completely free for those who use it and for all the businesses listed within. Over the course of the Guide’s decade-plus history, we’ve built the nation’s most robust directory of sustainable food purveyors through staff research, and with suggestions from individuals, partner organizations and the owners of many of the businesses we list.

    Our staff reviews all listings before adding them to the Guide by checking websites and/or calling businesses. Although we’re not a certifying agency, we make every effort to ensure that each listing meets the standards outlined below. We also make note of any sustainability certifications a business has earned from third-party certifiers on its listing page.

    Our Standards

    FARMS

    We list sustainable farms and ranches that offer foods including beef, dairy, eggs, pork, poultry and produce, along with U-pick farms and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs that: 

    • Promote animal welfare and raise animals on pasture without non-therapeutic antibiotics, synthetic growth hormones or the confinement systems used on industrial operations.
    • Protect biodiversity, soil, water and other natural resources, and avoid use of toxic pesticides, synthetic fertilizers and genetically modified (GM) crop varieties.

    While many farms listed in the Guide are USDA certified organic, we also include farms that are in the process of transitioning to organic, farms that go above and beyond the organic standards and farms that choose to use sustainable production techniques without seeking organic certification.

    RESTAURANTS

    We list restaurants that: 

    • Offer foods prepared with ingredients supplied directly by local, sustainable farms and other purveyors of local, sustainable food. Since seasonal growing conditions and access to sustainable farms vary widely across the country, we don’t require restaurants to source exclusively from local, sustainable farms. We include restaurants that make a sincere effort toward sustainability by sourcing the most sustainable ingredients as often as possible.

    BEER, WINE AND COCKTAIL ESTABLISHMENTS

    We list breweries, wineries and bars that: 

    • Demonstrate a commitment to sustainability by offering beer, wine and/or liquor produced using ingredients from growers who have achieved organic or biodynamic certification or practice sustainable growing techniques; abstain from the use of industrial pesticides and/or preservatives; utilize agricultural methods that promote biodiversity and soil enrichment; and conserve water and protect natural resources.

    STORES

    We list stores including bakeries, butcher shops, cheese shops, co-ops, fish markets, online shops and other specialty shops that:

    • Offer foods supplied directly by local, sustainable farms and other purveyors of local, sustainable food. Since seasonal growing conditions and access to sustainable farms vary widely across the country, we don’t require stores to source exclusively from local, sustainable farms. We include stores that make a sincere effort toward sustainability by offering the most sustainable foods as often as possible.
    • Fish markets must demonstrate a commitment to sustainability by selling seafood that is fished or farmed in ways that have less impact on the environment. For more information on sustainable seafood, please see Food & Water Watch’s Smart Seafood Guide.

    FARMERS’ MARKETS

    We list farmers’ markets that:

    • Offer foods supplied directly by local, sustainable farms and other purveyors of local, sustainable food.

    CHEFS, CATERERS AND MEAL DELIVERY

    We list chefs, caterers and meal delivery services that:

    • Offer foods prepared with ingredients supplied directly by local, sustainable farms and other purveyors of local, sustainable food. Since seasonal growing conditions and access to sustainable farms vary widely across the country, we don’t require chefs, caterers and meal delivery services to source exclusively from local, sustainable farms. We include chefs, caterers and meal delivery services that make a sincere effort toward sustainability by sourcing the most sustainable ingredients as often as possible.

    BED AND BREAKFASTS

    We list bed and breakfasts and farm stays that:

    • Provide overnight guests with foods supplied directly by local, sustainable farms and other purveyors of local, sustainable food. Since seasonal growing conditions and access to sustainable farms vary widely across the country, we don’t require bed and breakfasts to source exclusively from local, sustainable farms. We include bed and breakfasts that make a sincere effort toward sustainability by sourcing the most sustainable ingredients as often as possible.

    ORGANIZATIONS

    We list community gardens, education centers and organizations that:

    • Promote a more sustainable food system through education and/or advocacy.

  • IRIS OPT OUT

    IRIS is Idaho’s Immunization Tracking system. Your family is AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED into the system by authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Per a June 9, 2017 phone conversations with the Idaho Health Department, they do NOT have anything in their system that will alert the users of your request to OPT OUT to having your private medical data entered into their system. While you can ask for your information to be removed from the system, it can and will, be entered back in at anytime by authorized users (doctor, schools, daycare). In otherwords, if you don’t submit your request to the schools, doctors, daycare providers that you wish to have your private medical information REMAIN PRIVATE they will assume that you want to be tracked.

    Your children’s medical information is likely in the database RIGHT NOW. You must OPT OUT to have your information removed from the IRIS database.
    However, once your information is shared within the government tracking database, authorized 3rd parties can take the information and use it as they wish. While you can opt out of IRIS and purge your child’s information from their IRIS system, you are unable to purge it from the third party systems once it has been accessed. 

    Is this a gross violation of privacy? Do you think our tracking system should be something you can OPT IN to if you wish rather than being forced in? Its time to let our legislators know we want them to make this change! 

    per the IDAHO HEALTH AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE: http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/IDImmunizationProgram/ImmunizationRegistryIRIS/IRISOptOut/tabid/3812/Default.aspx

    Idaho’s Immunization Reminder Information System (IRIS) is a secure health information system containing the names and immunization history of people who have received vaccinations in Idaho. This information is available only to authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Participation in IRIS is voluntary and you may opt out at any time by contacting the Idaho Immunization Program at (208)334-5931 and requesting an opt-out form, or by completing this online opt-out form. 

    Please remember that if you opt to have information about yourself, your minor child, or person whom you are a legal guardian be removed from IRIS, then you must maintain the individual’s immunization (shot) records. Verification of immunization status is a requirement for entry to schools (including some secondary schools and colleges), summer or day camps, employment in certain industries, participation in certain volunteer activities, and other situations.

    Two options are available for opting out of IRIS for yourself, your minor child (under the age of 18 years), or a person for whom you are a legal guardian:  

    • Option 1:  Remove only immunization-related information from IRIS. Only demographic information is retained in IRIS, including name, address, phone number, mother’s maiden name, date of birth, and gender. Demographic information will not be viewable by medical providers, schools or childcare staff. By making this selection, I understand that allowing demographic information to be retained in IRIS will reduce the chance of accidental or intentional re-entry of vaccination information about me/him/her.
    • Option 2: Remove all information from IRIS – immunization and demographic. By making this selection, I understand that at any time, information regarding myself, my child, or person for whom I am a legal guardian, may be re-entered by a health care provider. I understand that I must work with my health care provider(s) to ensure this information is not re-entered into IRIS. 

    CLICK HERE to have your private medical information removed from IRIS. 

    CLICK HERE TO Find your Legislators and Send them a brief message:

    IRIS tracking system is NOT voluntary as an OPT OUT system. It is a gross violation of privacy. Please support legislation that changes the Health Department’s vaccine tracking system to an OPT IN by choice system. 

    2017 Legislative Session they attempted to expand the tracking to include Adults the bill was HB 91.https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0091/
    It FAILED to pass into law.

    The following representatives voted against an automatic tracking of adults into the IRIS system. Contact these Representatives and thank them for protecting privacy and ask them to sponsor a bill that removes the automatic entry of our children’s information. 

     Anderst, Armstrong, Barbieri, Blanksma, Boyle, Burtenshaw, Chaney, Cheatham, Clow, Collins, Crane, Dayley, DeMordaunt, Dixon, Gannon, Gestrin, Giddings, Hanks, Harris, Hartgen, Holtzclaw, Jordan, Kerby, Kingsley(Lohman), Luker, Manwaring, McDonald, Mendive, Monks, Moon, Moyle, Nate, Palmer, Scott, Shepherd, Stevenson, Syme, Thompson, Troy, Trujillo, Vander Woude, Youngblood, Zito, Zollinger

  • IRIS OPT OUT of Government Tracking of Your Child’s Private Medical Information

    IRIS is Idaho’s Immunization Tracking system. Your family is AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED into the system by authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Per a June 9, 2017 phone conversations with the Idaho Health Department, they do NOT have anything in their system that will alert the users of your request to OPT OUT to having your private medical data entered into their system. While you can ask for your information to be removed from the system, it can and will, be entered back in at anytime by authorized users (doctor, schools, daycare). In otherwords, if you don’t submit your request to the schools, doctors, daycare providers that you wish to have your private medical information REMAIN PRIVATE they will assume that you want to be tracked.

    Your children’s medical information is likely in the database RIGHT NOW. You must OPT OUT to have your information removed from the IRIS database.
    However, once your information is shared within the government tracking database, authorized 3rd parties can take the information and use it as they wish. While you can opt out of IRIS and purge your child’s information from their IRIS system, you are unable to purge it from the third party systems once it has been accessed. 

    Is this a gross violation of privacy? Do you think our tracking system should be something you can OPT IN to if you wish rather than being forced in? Its time to let our legislators know we want them to make this change! 

    per the IDAHO HEALTH AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE: http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/IDImmunizationProgram/ImmunizationRegistryIRIS/IRISOptOut/tabid/3812/Default.aspx

    Idaho’s Immunization Reminder Information System (IRIS) is a secure health information system containing the names and immunization history of people who have received vaccinations in Idaho. This information is available only to authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Participation in IRIS is voluntary and you may opt out at any time by contacting the Idaho Immunization Program at (208)334-5931 and requesting an opt-out form, or by completing this online opt-out form. 

    Please remember that if you opt to have information about yourself, your minor child, or person whom you are a legal guardian be removed from IRIS, then you must maintain the individual’s immunization (shot) records. Verification of immunization status is a requirement for entry to schools (including some secondary schools and colleges), summer or day camps, employment in certain industries, participation in certain volunteer activities, and other situations.

    Two options are available for opting out of IRIS for yourself, your minor child (under the age of 18 years), or a person for whom you are a legal guardian:  

    • Option 1:  Remove only immunization-related information from IRIS. Only demographic information is retained in IRIS, including name, address, phone number, mother’s maiden name, date of birth, and gender. Demographic information will not be viewable by medical providers, schools or childcare staff. By making this selection, I understand that allowing demographic information to be retained in IRIS will reduce the chance of accidental or intentional re-entry of vaccination information about me/him/her.
    • Option 2: Remove all information from IRIS – immunization and demographic. By making this selection, I understand that at any time, information regarding myself, my child, or person for whom I am a legal guardian, may be re-entered by a health care provider. I understand that I must work with my health care provider(s) to ensure this information is not re-entered into IRIS. 

    CLICK HERE to have your private medical information removed from IRIS. 

    CLICK HERE TO Find your Legislators and Send them a brief message:

    IRIS tracking system is NOT voluntary as an OPT OUT system. It is a gross violation of privacy. Please support legislation that changes the Health Department’s vaccine tracking system to an OPT IN by choice system. 

    2017 Legislative Session they attempted to expand the tracking to include Adults the bill was HB 91.https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0091/
    It FAILED to pass into law.

    The following representatives voted against an automatic tracking of adults into the IRIS system. Contact these Representatives and thank them for protecting privacy and ask them to sponsor a bill that removes the automatic entry of our children’s information. 

     Anderst, Armstrong, Barbieri, Blanksma, Boyle, Burtenshaw, Chaney, Cheatham, Clow, Collins, Crane, Dayley, DeMordaunt, Dixon, Gannon, Gestrin, Giddings, Hanks, Harris, Hartgen, Holtzclaw, Jordan, Kerby, Kingsley(Lohman), Luker, Manwaring, McDonald, Mendive, Monks, Moon, Moyle, Nate, Palmer, Scott, Shepherd, Stevenson, Syme, Thompson, Troy, Trujillo, Vander Woude, Youngblood, Zito, Zollinger

  • Take Action. Create Your Own No Spray Zone

    Are you willing to take responsibility of your own property? Let the government know you want to opt out of their toxic spray program. You have the legal right to opt out of pesticides on your property. Unlike other states, that have to BEG the local authorities to stop poisoning their families, we have the right to OPT-OUT of chemical control/treatments. Invite your neighbors to do the same. Create a spray free safety zone in your neighborhood.

    Unfounded FEAR: West Nile Virus

    CDC reports state wide in 2016  6 people tested positive for West Nile Virus and were either symptom-less or were sick with flu like symptoms.  Three individuals were hospitalized with more serious complications. There were NO FATALITIES. CDC reports that COMPLICATIONS from West Nile Virus are VERY, VERY RARE less than 1% of individuals actually experience complications from West Nile Virus.

    CDC RECORDS show that since 2002 less than a dozen people a year experience complications from the virus, with the exceptions of the unexplained outbreak in 2006 of two hundred plus cases. Ever since the 2006 outbreak anomaly, the government has be monitoring and spraying neighborhoods. Many times spray trucks drive-by unannounced catching families and pets in their path. The County has admitted they have a hard time ‘getting the word out’ of an impending area spray and proceed with truck based spraying in neighborhoods and play areas in the early summer evenings, just as the weather cools for the day.

    Hazardous Pesticides:

    Ada County’s Mosquito Abatement website reveals they use Dibrom, which is an organophosphate insecticide with the active ingredient Naled. Naled, a KNOWN neurotoxin is banned in many other countries. Recently scientists have expressed concerns about its affect on our babies in utero as it passes to the fetus through the placenta.

    Canyon County Mosquito Abatement website reveals they use Permithrin that has shown to have the following effects on humans:

    • Cancer: Possible (10)
    • Endocrine Disruption: Yes (5)
    • Reproductive Effects: Yes (13)
    • Neurotoxicity: Yes (11)
    • Kidney/Liver Damage: Yes (11)
    • Sensitizer/ Irritant: Yes (4)

    OPT OUT: 

    You have the legal right to opt out of pesticides on your property. Unlike other states, that have to BEG the local authorities to stop poisoning their families, we have the right to OPT-OUT of chemical control/treatments.

     In 2007, the Idaho Legislature revised Idaho Code to include a new provision that allows residents living within a Mosquito Abatement District to opt-out of the district’s control/treatment program. As outlined in § 39-2804(10) of Idaho Code, a landowner requesting to exclude his property from the abatement district’s mosquito control program must submit a written Mosquito Management Plan specific to his property.  The detailed plan must provide adequate control measures and be implemented by the landowner

    MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICTS OPT OUT FORMS can be hard to locate it might requiring calling the Mosquito Abatement Department for your county/city/area

    CONTACT INFORMATION


    Chemical Toxicity and Health Effects for Commonly used Mosquito Pesticides

    Non Toxic Alternatives to Pesticides: Can be found at Beyondpesticides.org

  • Zika Feared – Neurotoxin Sprayed

    Zika no longer a global emergency and yet, the pesticide spraying of known neurotoxins continues in Florida. 

    According to a new study out, naled- the pesticide widely used to fight Zika-carrying mosquitoes in Florida and across the nation- has been linked to deficits in motor functions in Chinese babies. Authors of the study say it’s the first to examine real-world exposure to naled outside of workplace accidents or lab experiments. The University of Michigan study was published in the journal Environment International.

    RELATED ARTICLES:

    Using cord blood from 237 mothers who gave birth to healthy babies at a hospital in southeast China between 2008 and 2011, researchers found that at six weeks, the babies displayed no problems. However, at nine months, the babies suffered from slight problems with coordination, movement, and other motor functions. Miami Herald, June 2017.”>1 (Researchers used standard motor-skill tests that look at reflexes, body control, movement, and hand and eye coordination to assess problems; as exposure to naled increased, deficits also rose.)

    Although the study was only a close snapshot of a particular group of mothers, the authors rightly pointed out the need to take a closer look at using naled.

    Naled has been used for decades in Florida to control marsh mosquitoes. It’s sprayed by plane “mostly over suburban fringes bordering marshes and mangroves before dawn.” However, last year (thanks to people like YOU) it drew more attention and quick opposition when Miami-Dade County and other urban areas “battling Zika” started using it: Miami Herald, June 2017.”>2

    • In South Florida, protesters prompted the county to put off using the pesticide in Miami Beach to give the city more time to notify residents.
    • Federal officials backed off a plan to use naled in Puerto Rico after its governor protested.
    • Europe had already banned naled in 2012.
    • But of course, the CDC recommended its use in combination with organic larvicides that kill mosquito eggs in standing water.

    But, back to China. How did women end up with the poison in their cord blood? Especially given the fact that Amvac, the U.S. manufacturer of the pesticide, has no record of selling naled in China?

    “Silver said it was impossible to determine how the Chinese mothers ended up with naled in their blood, although she suspected it was used on crops or mosquito spraying. The team used cord blood collected between 2008 and 2011 by co-author Betsy Lozoff for another study that looked at iron deficiency and brain development. They found a number of pesticides but focused on five that occurred in traceable levels.” Miami Herald, June 2017.”>3

    Sources and References
    1. Miami Herald, June 2017.
    2. Miami Herald, June 2017.
    3. Miami Herald, June 2017.

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.healthnutnews.com/study-links-pesticide-used-to-fight-zika-in-florida-to-health-impacts-in-chinese-babies/.

  • Tainted Vaccines

    Vaccines are tainted with residual DNA from the bodies of aborted babies they were created upon. Marcella Piper-Terry shares proof that children were aborted SPECIFICALLY to develop vaccines for rubella 60 years ago and even today in China babies are aborted specifically for the development of vaccines. There is residual DNA from both MALE and FEMALE injected into our children numerous times in infancy and in childhood. The fact that the Chickenpox, Hepatitis-A and B combo, MMR (measles), Pentacel vaccines were developed using aborted fetal cell lines with residual DNA of MRC-5 and WI-38 has never been hidden from the public.  The problem is that when parents go to their family doctors for vaccinations, who asks to see the product insert?  The one sheet flyer given to parents doesn’t list most of the possible side effects and none of the vaccine ingredients.
    Doctors, who have been administering the vaccines for years have never checked into the ingredients, although it has always been right at their fingertips.  And what would happen if they did?  They would read that the vaccine contains “residual DNA and proteins” and “components” of “MRC-5″, “WI-38″ (or both) “human diploid cell lines”.

    SOURCE: NVIC http://www.vaccine-tlc.org/human

    SOURCE: Click on Picture to Hear Testimony from Dr Deischer of Sound Choice regarding residual aborted human DNA in our vaccines

    What’s in your Vaccines? SOURCE: tinyurl.com/excipientlist directly from the CDC 
    (hint open the page and click CONTROL F to open a window to search for specific ingredients type in MRC-5 or WI-38)

    RA273 (Rubella Abortus  /27th sample/ 3 tissues samples)
    In the 1960’s, to culture LIVE VIRUSES. They need to have live human tissue to grow on.
    26 babies were aborted because doctors told the mothers that due to the exposure to rubella their babies were going to be deformed. Those babies WERE NOT infected with rubella and they died because ‘science was wrong’ and the ‘doctors made a mistake’. It wasn’t until the 27th baby that they found a child actually INFECTED with the rubella virus. They used that child as spare parts. Then they had to find a suitable cell line to replicate that virus. 80 abortions were used to make the Rubella Vaccine.

    WI-38 human diploid cell line
    The WI-38 human diploid cell line (RA 273) was a 16-week-old female baby (20 cm long) who was aborted in Sweden because the parents felt they had too many children. The baby was packed on ice and sent to the United States (speculation suggests without consent – which was common) where it was dissected. The use of WI-38 cells is a lucrative moneymaking business.

    The rubella vaccine currently used in the U.S. and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak. Eighty elective abortions (recorded) were involved in the research and final production of the current rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.”

    MRC-5 cell line
    The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14-week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons by a 27-year-old physically healthy woman. MRC-5 is a known source of human DNA in vaccines.