Author: Health Freedom Idaho

  • Vaccines and Religious Exemption

    Vaccines and Religious Exemption

    Vaccine Exemptions Protect Religious Liberty.  The development of vaccine on the bodies of more than 80 aborted human beings, convicts individuals, from a variety of religious backgrounds, AGAINST the injection of abortion tainted vaccines including MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), Chicken Pox and Hep A. All three vaccines (and more) are required for public, private, religious-based school enrollment.
    Preserving the religious exemption of vaccines for both school and employment protects our individual liberty. SB 1050 will clarify statute to allow parents to invoke their legal right to vaccine exemption without intimidation and discrimination.
     
    Has anyone told you they didn’t believe we could possibly have vaccines produced right here in America from aborted fetal cell lines?  Did anyone tell you it was a hoax?


    The fact that the Chickenpox, Hepatitis-A and MMR vaccines were developed using aborted fetal cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 has never been hidden from the public.  The problem is that when parents go to their family doctors for vaccinations, who asks to see the product insert?  The one sheet flyer given to parents doesn’t list most of the possible side effects and none of the vaccine ingredients. Doctors, who have been administering the vaccines for years have never checked into the ingredients, although it has always been right at their fingertips.  And what would happen if they did?  They would read that the vaccine contains “residual DNA and proteins” and “components” of “MRC-5″, “WI-38″ (or both) “human diploid cell lines”.

    Click here for the Manufacturer’s package insert portion describing the fetal cell lines.



    SUMMARY: 
    The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. MRC-5 is a known source of human DNA in vaccines.

    The WI-38 human diploid cell line (RA 273) was a 16-week-old female baby (20 cm long) who was aborted in Sweden because the parents felt they had too many children. The baby was packed on ice and sent to the United States (speculation suggests without consent – which was common) where it was dissected. The use of WI-38 cells is a lucrative moneymaking business.

    The rubella vaccine currently used in the U.S. and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak. Eighty elective abortions (recorded) were involved in the research and final production of the current rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.”

    “PER C6 came from a healthy 18 week-old baby who was aborted for social reasons. This tumorigenic strain is being used to develop adenovirus, Ebola, influenza, malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV vaccines. Developers call it a “human designer cell” but what they really mean is “aborted baby cells.”

    The HEK293 cell line is derived from the kidneys of a healthy aborted fetus and is being used to develop new influenza vaccines.

    IMR-90 cell line came from a 16-week old female aborted baby 
    IMR-91 came from a male aborted baby. Both were created for vaccine production and functional references.

    WI-44 was derived from the lung of a three-month old surgically aborted fetus.

    WALVAX2 – Fetal cell line developed to replace MRC-5 and WI-38 because they are becoming too tumorigenic (causing too much cancer in children who receive vaccines made from them).
    You can’t be pro-life and pro-vaccine.
    #VaxXed #Truth #Science

    Which Vaccines contain Human DNA from Aborted Fetal Cells? (printable)
    find out more


    No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:

    Editorials on Vaccine and Religion:

    Vaccines: a Religious Contention
    article on various tenants of faith and their reaction to aborted fetal cell vaccines

    Vaccine Risk Awareness
    article from UK on Catholic faith and aborted fetal cells and vaccines


    OPEN LETTER to ALL RELIGIOUS LEADERS in CALIFORNIA  RE: SB277 Government Mandated Vaccines for all children

    <printable verison>
    Printable Copy of the article: Vaccines, Abortion and Fetal Tissue

    Helpful Resources:

    Vaccine Summary sheet from vaccine rights attorney, Alan Phillips:  http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=e05b7d7adb6e660d8cf0748f9&id=4f92ecc522&e=e4e3fa348e  (2nd link once you click this)

    The movie Silent Epidemic,  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4


    MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ABORTED FETAL CELL SOURCES:

    Taken from the Coriell Cell Repository, a company that actually sells fetal (and other) tissue cell lines, is a complete scientific description of the cell lines and the information on the original abortions:

    MRC-5  Aborted Fetal Cell Line       
    WI-38 Aborted Fetal Cell Line

    More Aborted Fetal Cell Lines Used in Products and Product Testing

    PER C6 & HEK-293      
    IMR-90 and IMR-91

    And there is a plethora of information on many more abortions that were part of polio vaccine research.

    Read the document excerpts from the scientists themselves.



  • Mumps is making headlines..again

    Mumps is making headlines..again

    Mumps makes headlines every year at this time. It always starts in High Schools, colleges, and universities. Each year, the number of mumps cases fluctuates within a range of a couple hundred to a couple thousand cases.
    CNN reports that, “In December, the CDC said that most of the individual state outbreaks had been occurring among vaccinated people.

    During 2016, 5,311 cases in 46 states and the District of Columbia were reported to the CDC.

    This is because of four things:

    1. The mumps component of the MMR vaccine does not work, and when it does work, it wears off after 10-15 years in a large number of kids. So many of those who were fully vaccinated (2 doses) have no immunity by their late teens.

    2. Once there is a single case of mumps, people panic and run out to get a “booster” of MMR vaccine. It’s a live virus vaccine and recently vaccinated people can infect others for 4-6 weeks post-vaccination. So recently vaccinated high school and college students are infecting each other, due to the two factors: lack of protection for those who had two vaccines before entering kindergarten, and horizontal transmission (shedding) from the recently vaccinated. This is especially likely to happen in close quarters and among those who are swapping saliva – by kissing and/or sharing drinks, etc…

    3. Colleges and Universities are international melting pots. Mumps – like measles – has different strains (similar to different strains of flu virus), and different strains are endemic (occur naturally) in different countries. That’s why different countries use different vaccines. And just like the flu vaccine, if the strain doesn’t match, it doesn’t work.

    4. The reason we see more of this in late January and early February (every year) is because colleges and universities deny students access to financial aid if they cannot produce their “up-to-date” shot records.
    Many college students don’t know they have the right to refuse vaccines (unless they live in California, Mississippi, or West Virginia), and nobody tells them about religious exemptions. Many college students also do not have easy access to their vaccination records, and thinking there is no harm in getting re-vaccinated (because, after-all… “vaccines are perfectly safe!” [no. they aren’t]), they will just go to the university health clinic and get shot up again so they can access their financial aid.

    That generally happens during the first or second week of January. The “outbreaks” generally happen during the second half of January and they subside around mid-late February.

    #Mumps #Vaccines #VaccineSafety #RFKcommission #VaxXed

    RESOURCES: 
    FRAUD: 
  • Science IS NOT Settled. Manufacturers say they have never even tested!

    Science IS NOT Settled. Manufacturers say they have never even tested!

    “I was talking with my pediatrician about vaccines and asked him what are the possible side effects. He mentioned fever, crying, sore leg. So I asked him for vaccine inserts to study them at home. He refused to give it to me. I was able to get them anyway (not from him). I just sat down to write down all possible side effects ***stated in vaccine inserts*** not made up, and here is the list.

    I apologize for no order of any form, I would just add whatever new I found.

    VACCINES’ SIDE EFFECTS:

    Irritability
    Injection site tenderness
    Decreased appetite
    Decreased sleep
    Increased sleep
    Fever
    Injection site redness
    Injection site swelling
    Fatigue
    Headache
    Muscle pain
    Joint pain
    Chills
    Limitation of arm movement
    Rash
    Sore throat
    Abdominal pain
    Chickenpox-like rash on the body or at the site of the shot
    Tingling of the skin
    Shingles
    Shortness of breath or wheezing
    Rash or hives
    Bruising more easily than normal
    Red or purple flat pinhead spots under the skin
    Severe paleness
    Difficulty walking
    Severe skin disorders
    Skin infection
    Swelling of the brain
    Stroke
    Inflammation of the lungs (pneumonia)
    Seizures
    Drowsiness
    Collapse or shock-like state
    Persistent inconsolable crying lasting over 3 hours
    Febrile seizure
    Hypotonic-hypo responsive episodes
    Bronchitis
    Myalgia
    Cellulitis
    Respiratory track infection
    Lymphadenopathy
    Thrombocytopenia
    Anaphylactic reaction
    Hypersensitivity
    Ear pain
    Cyanosis
    Apnea
    Cough
    Angioedema
    Erythema
    Pruritus
    Urticaria
    SIDS (!!!!!!!)
    Injection site erythema
    Unusual high pitch crying
    Pain
    Otitis media
    Upper respiratory infection
    Hib disease
    Guillian-Bare syndrome
    Pyrexia
    Pharyngitis
    Gastroenteritis
    Culture negative clinical sepsis
    Asthma
    Diabetes mellitus
    Chronic neutropenia
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
    Stiffness
    Menstruation disorders
    Penniculitis
    Atypical measles
    Syncope
    Malaise
    Vasculitis
    Pancreatitis
    Diarrhea
    Vomiting
    Parotitis
    Nausea
    Diabetes mellitus
    Purpura
    Regional lumphadenopathy
    Leukocytosis
    Peripheral edema
    Facial edema
    Bronchial spasm
    Chronic joints symptoms
    Encephalopathy
    Measles inclusion body encephalitis
    Pneumonitis
    Rhinitis
    Stevens-Johnson syndrome
    Erythema multiforme
    Urticaria
    Nerve deafness
    Otitis media
    Retinitis
    Optic neuritis
    Papillitis
    Retrobulbar neuritis
    Conjunctivitis
    Epidymitis
    Orchiti
    ANOREXIA
    Agitation
    Insomnia
    Somnolence
    Flushing
    Hypotension
    Abdominal pain/cramps
    Constipation
    Petechiae
    Pruritus
    Urticaria
    Weakness
    DEATH (!!!)

    Also, all vaccines inserts state that vaccines:

    “…have not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.” “

  • THEY ASKED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

    THEY ASKED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

    In true Legislative Fashion, there is a meeting called to hear public opinion however the public wasn’t given much notification.
    TOMORROW, Friday Morning Jan 27, 2017 both Health and Welfare Committees from the House and the Senate will be opening the floor for discussion for 2 hours. You have 3 minutes to present your concerns to the committee about health (and welfare) issues. 
    Can’t make it to BOISE and the State Capitol? DON’T LET THAT STOP YOU! 
    You can send a VIDEO MESSAGE to the legislators telling them your concerns! 

    To download Testifi for your Android device, click this link from your phone or tablet.

    To download Testifi for your Apple device, click this link from your phone or tablet.

    The 3 Topics that will be the focus of Health Freedom Idaho this session are

    NATUROPATHIC LICENSING
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    • Licensing through the state is not necessary, and is not time or cost effective.
    • Licensing restricted to a few accredited schools would stifle and eventually destroy naturopathy in Idaho. This exclusivity would soon drive out competition, new ideas, and new practices that are the lifeblood of our state and country.
    • This would create unemployment for most of the naturopaths in Idaho.
    REPEAL OF “FAITH HEALING” EXEMPTION
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    • Removing this exemption is in violation of the constitution. The first amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
    • Alternative treatment choices by parents for their children should not be criminalized.
    • Parents actively seeking healing and/or treatment for their child in means that differ from the AMA should not be subject to criminal charges of abuse or neglect. A recent Johns Hopkins study shows that medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death in our nation. There are already specific Idaho statutes in place to protect children from intentional physical abuse.
    IDHW IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION FORM
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    Idaho Statute permits a parent/guardian:
    1. The right to choose whether to vaccinate their child
    2. The right to choose to participate or decline participation in the state vaccine registry system
    (IRIS).
    • IDHW REFUSES to accept the legally approved signed parental affidavits forcing schools to deny admission to children. Parents enrolling children in schools and daycare are being forced to complete IDHW’s mandatory immunization form. The form is designed to make parents state they are guilty of medical neglect, denies parents’ legally protected medical privacy, and violates their legally protected right to opt out of the State Registry.
    • Idaho Department of Health and Welfare has imposed IDAPA RULE 16.02.15 (110.02), creating the mandatory IDAHO CERTIFICATE OF IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION for school and daycare admission.
    • However, the only requirement of parents under Idaho Code is stated in 39-4802(2): to “submit a signed statement to school officials stating an objection on religious or other grounds.” The state-prescribed form, based on IDAPA 16.02.15, is in violation of Code 39-4802 and 39-4804. The form developed by IDHW falls far outside the scope of Idaho Code 39-1118(2)and 39-4802(2).
  • Centenarians tell us the secret to long life

    Centenarians tell us the secret to long life

    The secrets to a long and happy life offered by those will will mark their 100th birthday or more this year were as individual as the people providing them. 

    Heredity, family and remaining active are all qualities that the centenarians said helped them to have a long life. A sense of humor and not worrying were also identified as attributes that contribute to longevity.

    Christine Petersen of Butte is 103 and her advice for a happy life, she said, involved friends, children and a happy marriage.

    A good marriage is important to her, she said, explaining that yes, she did indeed marry the right man.

    She and Herbert married in 1932, she said. She remembers their 50th anniversary but beyond that, she said, too many years have passed to recall.

    Petersen was born in Denmark while her mother was there visiting. Her mother died during childbirth, she said, and it wasn’t until she was 8 that she journeyed to the United States where her father was ranching near Bannack, outside of Dillon.

    Brief biographies assembled by the state for this event, held at the Red Lion Colonial Inn in Helena, said Petersen arrived with her siblings to join their father.

    Petersen’s advice for a long life is to eat healthy food, work hard and have a positive outlook on life.

    “Probably 100 other reasons right now I can’t think of,” she said and added, “Make the best of every day.”

    Edith Spencer came from Bozeman for the celebration, as she will mark her 100th birthday in August.

    “I don’t believe in growing old,” she said. “I just grow. If I get old, that’s an accident.”

    “Belief in God and in the next day,” she said of what has allowed her to have a long life. “And God comes first because there might not be another day.”

    There was no pause when asked for advice on how to have a happy life.

    “Marry the right person,” she said. “I did. Robert Clark Spencer.”

    Her biography said they came to Montana in the late 1980s to be closer to their youngest son and his family.

    Fritz Weed, who will be 100 by year’s end, said hard work and “behaving yourself once in a while,” were his secrets to having a long life.

    “You have to have a little fun now and then,” added the Helena resident who was born in Terry.

    He, like Spencer, said marriage can be important in having a happy life.

    “I had a beautiful wife for 60 years,” he said.

    “It sure was good,” he said.

    Ruth Arnold, 103 and from Three Forks, was among the centenarians scattered throughout the audience.

    Her German ancestry, she said, contributed to her long life.

    Having a happy life, she said, means “having a good attitude and trying to do the right thing. Be kind to other people and respect other people.”

    “I’ve found a good word goes a long ways,” Arnold said.

    Gov. Steve Bullock, the keynote speaker, singled out several of the centenarians as he spoke and made note of Charles Bennetts, 101, of Fairfield, who rode his horse to school. In Bennetts’ senior year, he rode in minus 50 degree weather to take an exam at the community’s high school.

    While noting how the centenarians have been active, Bullock pointed out that being active is the key to success in all of their lives.

    To make it to 100 a person needs the right genes, a good dose of determination and the right luck, he said.

    This article originally appeared at: http://helenair.com/news/local/i-don-t-believe-in-growing-old-centenarians-explain-their/article_e01e6836-e78f-59ac-a627-9ad3d6f74cb7.html.
  • How Can the Public Health Department Get Away It…

    How Can the Public Health Department Get Away It…

    Senate Bill #1050
    Clarifies Section 39-4802 (2)Idaho Code that a parent has the legal right to enroll their child(ren) in Idaho schools, while maintaining their privacy, their right to medical confidentiality, and the right to opt out of providing IRIS-type vaccination information. 

    Parents’ rights, privacy, confidentiality, and the right to shield oneself from unjust incrimination are paramount to Idahoans and of utmost importance in maintaining liberty.  This bill will secure those natural rights.

    Idaho has clearly stated in existing laws that parents are legally able to opt out of some/all vaccines for their children when enrolling in daycare or public school.  The Public Health Department has created administrative procedures that intentionally discriminates against a minority group, violates their privacy, and denies their children access to schools when they opt to take their legally allowed vaccine exemption.

    1. IDAHO STATUES CLEARLY STATE: VACCINES ARE NOT MANDATED FOR DAYCARE or SCHOOLS.
    2. IDAHO STATUES CLEARLY STATE: PARENTS MAY SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT THEY ARE CHOOSING TO EXEMPT THEIR CHILD FROM SOME/ALL VACCINES.

    Department of Health will NOT ACCEPT the legally acceptable written statement from parents.

    Department of Health has created a form that violates family’s rights and in turn forces school officials to deny children entrance into schools

    • Parents are forced to sign IDHW’s mandatory form that demands parents state they are putting their children at risk to contracting disease that carry serious complications.
      EXEMPTION FORM http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Portals/0/Health/Immunizations/School%20Exemption%20Form%20-%20English.pdf
    • IDHW’s form was intentionally created to gather data from parents for the purpose of submitting that data to a ‘voluntary’ vaccine tracking database. Removing parental right to privacy and legal option to OPT OUT of the registry.
    • The Health Department refuses to accept a legally acceptable signed parental affidavit. A blatant disregard for Idaho statue. Discriminating against families who choose to invoke their legal option to vaccine exemption.
     
    The Public Health department is getting away creating procedures that contradict the law and children are being denied access to daycare and schools.

    February 6th the Senate Health and Welfare Committee heard Health Freedom Idaho’s concerns and voted to have those concerns heard as bill #S 1050. <https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/S1050.pdf>

    <Listen Online Feb 6 Health and Welfare Committee starting at minute 19:00>
    http://lso.legislature.idaho.gov/MediaArchive/ShowMediaByCommittee.do 


    The purpose of this bill is to clarify Section 39-4802 (2)Idaho Code.

    The current language is as follows:

     (2) Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted assigned statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.

     Original Intent

    The original intent of this section was that an Idaho parent/ guardian may exercise their right to privacy and medical confidentiality by simply submitting a signed statement to school officials in

    order to invoke their right to exemption regarding the state-prescribed vaccination schedule for school enrollment.

     Rules Created Mandating Unjust Form

    Rules have since been created requiring a state health department form be mandated. The form that was created for this purpose contains unnecessary, possibly incriminating language that is far outside the scope of this section.

     

    Section 39-4804 Idaho Code is being disregarded in the forced use of the current mandatory exemption form. That section states in part:

     

    NOTIFICATION TO PARENT OR GUARDIAN.

     (b) Participation in the immunization registry is voluntary;Because the Idaho IRIS vaccine registry is voluntary, a parent is not requiredto disclose vaccination status to the state.

     Form Forces Parents to Give Up Rights or Child’s Education

    By mandating the current exemption form, which listsindividual vaccines and demands confidential medical information, parents arenot able to exercise their right to privacy and exemption without facingenrollment denial by schools. Clearly this form does not align with theintentions of the current statutes.

     This Bill Will Re-secure Idahoan’s Rights to Privacy, Confidentiality,& Avoidance of Unjust Incrimination

     This bill would modify for clarification Section 39-4802 (2)to read:

     (2) Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted asigned statement to school officials stating their objections on religious orother grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter. The signedstatement may appear in a letter from the parent or guardian and is notrequired to be made on a form furnished by the state board of health andwelfare, a school, or another entity.

     This clarifies that a parent has the right to enroll their child(ren) in Idaho schools, while maintaining their privacy, their right to medical confidentiality, and the right to opt out of providing IRIS-type vaccination information. Parents’ rights, privacy, confidentiality, and the right to shield oneself from unjust incrimination are paramount to Idahoans and of utmost importance in maintaining liberty.  This bill will secure those natural rights.

  • SB1050 Immunization Exemption Form

    SB1050 Immunization Exemption Form

    SUPPORT SB 1050 for Immunization Exemption Form COMPLIANCE
    Media Contact:  Sarah @ exemptions@healthfreedomidaho.com

    IDAHO STATUTES CLEARLY STATE: VACCINES ARE NOT MANDATED FOR DAYCARE or SCHOOLS. LAWS CLEARLY STATE A PARENT’S WRITTEN STATEMENT IS AN ACCEPTABLE FORM OF IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION. The Public Health Department refuses to accept a parents’ written affidavit, which leads many to wonder HOW IS THAT LEGAL?

    Idaho’s Health & Welfare Department created a mandatory immunization form that falls FAR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF CURRENT STATUTES and is discriminatory to the minority of parents who legally choose to OPT OUT of the full CDC vaccine schedule. Parents are forced to sign IDHW’s mandatory form that demands parents state that they are putting their children at risk. No parent should be forced to sign a form that is self-incriminatory in order to enroll their child into a daycare program or public school.

    The Public Health department is getting away with creating their own rules and children are being denied access to daycare and schools.Regardless of your opinion on the efficacy of vaccines, it is unacceptable to allow the Department of Health to mandate a discriminatory form for school enrollment that violates privacy and is potentially self-incriminating. 

    LAW STATES Idaho Code 39-4802: Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.  Medical exemptions are also allowed.

    Our Current Immunization Exemption Laws Clearly States:

    • Idaho Statutes permit you, as an individual or parent the right to choose whether or not to vaccinate your child.  
    • The statute does not require you to disclose what other grounds your refusal to immunization is. As with any medical decision, the decision to vaccinate is a right of the individual or parent.
    • The State of Idaho, your doctor and public health employees cannot force you or your child to be vaccinated.
    • Your child cannot be excluded from a school or public program because you have exercised your right to not vaccinate.

      Just line out and initial it? NOPE!

      Health Freedom Idaho Surveys show that most schools have denied children access to school when parents have submitted the legally acceptable parental statement of vaccine exemption. There are many schools refusing to accept the form if it has been altered in any way.  

      This discriminatory action on the part of schools (who feel their hands are tied due to Health and Welfare Administrative policy) has caught the attention of Health Freedom Idaho.  While correspondence from the Office of the Attorney General and Legislators have shown that there is in fact a discrepancy in the legal statutes and the scope of the form required by IDHW there has been no challenge to change the current administrative procedures to fall back in line with the law.
      SEE:  Letter 1.    Letter 2. 

      The Law Clearly States Exemptions are Permitted and the legally acceptable process a parent can follow.
      The Administrative Policies of the Health and Welfare Department clearly fall OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF LAW.

      IDHW’s MANDATORY IMMUNIZATION FORM IS DISCRIMINATORY.

      Health Freedom Idaho presented proposed clarifying legislation on February 6 to the Senate Health and Welfare Committee. They confirmed that indeed the Idaho Health and Welfare Department’s form falls outside the scope of the law. A new bill Senate Bill #1050 was created and will now work its way through the legislative process.

      Health Freedom Idaho’s summary of the bill’s purpose:

      This clarifies that a parent has the right to enroll their child(ren) in Idaho schools, while maintaining their privacy, their right to medical confidentiality, and the right to opt out of providing IRIS-type vaccination information. Parents’ rights, privacy, confidentiality, and the right to shield oneself from unjust incrimination are paramount to Idahoans and of utmost importance in maintaining liberty. This bill will secure those natural rights.

    • CONTACT THE HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMITTEES Today tell them YES on SB1050 the Health Department should be required to comply with the existing statues allowing parents to opt out of vaccines using a signed statement. 

    IDAHO STATUTES CLEARLY STATE: VACCINES ARE NOT MANDATED FOR DAYCARE or SCHOOLS. LAWS CLEARLY STATE A PARENT’S WRITTEN STATEMENT IS AN ACCEPTABLE FORM OF IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION. The Public Health Department refuses to accept a parents’ written affidavit, which leads many to wonder HOW IS THAT LEGAL?
    Idaho’s Health & Welfare Department created a mandatory immunization form that falls FAR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF CURRENT STATUTES and is discriminatory to the minority of parents who legally choose to OPT OUT of the full CDC vaccine schedule. Parents are forced to sign IDHW’s mandatory form that demands parents state that they are putting their children at risk. No parent should be forced to sign a form that is self-incriminatory in order to enroll their child into a daycare program or public school.
    The Public Health department is getting away with creating their own rules and children are being denied access to daycare and schools.


    UPDATE!! ACT NOW!


    There is A LOT going on behind the scenes to shut down the bill SB 1050.
    (SB 1050 is the HFI sponsored bill that would keep the Health Departments administrative policy in line with the current statute.)
    It appears we are poking a bear (aka the Health Department) that is use to getting its own way! In order to protect liberty, we need a GIANT response. The Health Department is making every attempt to not only shut down our efforts to keep them ‘in line’ with existing statutes. Tell our elected officials they MUST SUPPORT SB 1050.

    This is easy with the Testify App

    Click here to get Testifi on Google Play.

    Click here to get Testifi in the Apple App Store.

    and send a quick message “Support SB 1050” to:
    1. The Governor
    2. Your District Legislators
    3 The Health and Welfare Committees 

    SB 1050 keeps administrative policy from usurping Idaho law. It allows parents to make an informed choice to opt out of vaccines without discrimination, revealing private medical information and without being entered into a tracking database without consent.
    LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!

    If you don’t have Testifi here’s phone/email list: 
    Governor Butch Otter Office
    Email
    334-2100

    Senate Health Committee which approved the RS to go to print as a bill

    Agenbroad 332-1329 jagenbroad@senate.idaho.gov
    Anthon 332-1346 kanthon@senate.idaho.gov
    Foreman 332-1405 dforeman@senate.idaho.gov
    Harris 332-1429 mharris@senate.idaho.gov
    Heider 332-1347 lheider@senate.idaho.gov
    Jordan 3321412 mjordan@senate.idaho.gov
    Lee 332-1325 alee@senate.idaho.gov
    Martin 332-1358 fmartin@senate.idaho.gov
    Souza 332-1322 msouza@senate.idaho.gov

    House Health Committee

    Blanksma 332-1054 mblanksma@house.idaho.gov
    Chew 332-1049 schew@house.idaho.gov
    Gibbs 332-1042 mgibbs@house.idaho.gov
    Hanks 332-1056 khanks@house.idaho.gov
    Hixon 332-1052 bhixon@house.idaho.gov
    Kingsley 332-1133 mkingsley@house.idaho.gov
    Packer 332-1045 kpacker@house.idaho.gov
    Perry 332-1044 cperry@house.idaho.gov
    Redman 332-1070 eredman@house.idaho.gov
    Rubel 332-1034 irubel@house.idaho.gov
    VanderWoude 332-1037 jvanderwoude@house.idaho.gov
    Wood 332-1074 fwood@house.idaho.gov
    Zollinger 332-1073 bzollinger@house.idaho.gov

    SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY 


    Additional Resources:

    The purpose of this bill is to clarify Section 39-4802 (2)Idaho Code.

    The current language is as follows:

     

    (2) Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.

     

    Original Intent

    The original intent of this section was that an Idaho parent/ guardian may exercise their right to privacy and medical confidentiality by simply submitting a signed statement to school officials in

    order to invoke their right to exemption regarding the state-prescribed vaccination schedule for school enrollment.

     

    Rules Created Mandating Unjust Form

    Rules have since been created requiring a state health department form be mandated. The form that was created for this purpose contains unnecessary, possibly incriminating language that is far outside the scope of this section.

     

    Section 39-4804 Idaho Code is being disregarded in the forced use of the current mandatory exemption form. That section states in part:

     

    NOTIFICATION TO PARENT OR GUARDIAN.

     

    (b) Participation in the immunization registry is voluntary;Because the Idaho IRIS vaccine registry is voluntary, a parent is not required to disclose vaccination status to the state.

     

    Form Forces Parents to Give Up Rights or Child’s Education

    By mandating the current exemption form, which lists individual vaccines and demands confidential medical information, parents are not able to exercise their right to privacy and exemption without facing enrollment denial by schools. Clearly this form does not align with the intentions of the current statutes.

     

    This Bill Will Re-secure Idahoan’s Rights to Privacy, Confidentiality,& Avoidance of Unjust Incrimination

     

    This bill would modify for clarification Section 39-4802 (2)to read:

     

    (2) Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter. The signed statement may appear in a letter from the parent or guardian and is not required to be made on a form furnished by the state board of health and welfare, a school, or another entity.

     

    This clarifies that a parent has the right to enroll their child(ren) in Idaho schools, while maintaining their privacy, their right to medical confidentiality, and the right to opt out of providing IRIS-type vaccination information. Parents’ rights, privacy, confidentiality, and the right to shield oneself from unjust incrimination are paramount to Idahoans and of utmost importance in maintaining liberty. This bill will secure those natural rights.

  • Let’s Talk About Immunization and Herd Immunity

    Let’s Talk About Immunization and Herd Immunity

    The Idaho public health department is insist in the need to have high vaccine rates in our children to protect the population and “maintain herd immunity”. Our state leads the nation in the right to choose to administer ‘preventative’ vaccines to our children. This causes many in the public health department to wring their hands in dismay over the state’s ‘lack of herd immunity protection’. 

    What is your concern about the vaccine exemption form? SHARE THAT WITH ALL the Legislators on the Health and Welfare Committee. This week they were present for a meeting from the health department entitled immunization exemption. Take time to explain how the administrative policies fall outside the scope of the law and how they directly impact your family.
    Here are 3 inconsistencies with the theory of vaccine induced herd immunity that need to be addressed:
    1. Is the concept of herd immunity ONLY for our children? 
    96% of the adult population in our schools and community are NOT up to date on the more than 32 recommended ADULT vaccines.
    This begs the question can a ‘childhood disease’ distinguish age of the individual its infecting? As an adult, Are you up to date on all your shots?  Are you aware of what that means?
    2. Immunization (Vaccine) Exemptions numbers are not accurate. The Idaho Health Department considers immunization exemption rates based on a FULL 36 vaccine schedule for our children. 
    Concerns about 12% of Idaho families are opting out of the ‘chicken pox’ vaccine. Since 2000 to 2013, CDC reports that nationwide there were 68,453 reported chicken pox cases and an average of 19 Americans reported to die of the chicken pox annually. 
    According to the limited death report data for the state, there were NO DEATHS in Idaho from chicken pox. 
    in contrast there was reported 2532 serious reactions to the chicken pox vaccine across the country in those same years. Sixteen Idaho families suffered from serious injury or death from the CHICKEN POX VACCINE over the last 14 years. 
    3. The herd immunity argument has always been inconsistent. On the one hand, the theory goes, people who cannot receive vaccines for whatever reason are protected from the disease through a high level of vaccination in the rest of society. On the other hand, the theory continues, parents who don’t vaccinate their children put the health of wider society at risk. 
    There are SO MANY MORE concepts I won’t  take the time to discuss but I have provided links for further research.
    Thank you for taking time to review these CONCERNS regarding the concept of ‘herd immunity’ and the violation of personal liberty. 
    RESOURCES: 
    Chicken Pox Vaccine INCREASES rates for complication from Shingles: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/09/01/12896.aspx

    Found: 2532 cases where “Vaccine targets” or :Varicella (MMRV or VARCEL)” and “Serious” and Vaccination Date from “2000-01-01′ to 2014-12-31:  http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php

  • 4 Recipes for Creamy Gluten-Free Cheesecake

    4 Recipes for Creamy Gluten-Free Cheesecake

    Basic Gluten-Free Cheesecake

    SERVES 12

    Modify this versatile recipe using different crusts and toppings to suit your needs. It’s fun to create different desserts using one basic no-fail cheesecake.

    2 (8-ounce) packages cream cheese or dairy-free cream cheese, room temperature
    1½ cups sugar
    5 eggs, room temperature
    2 cups Greek yogurt, sour cream or dairy-free sour cream
    2 tablespoons cornstarch or arrowroot
    1 teaspoon pure vanilla extract
    1 gluten-free crust of choice, pre- baked
    Topping of choice

    1. Preheat oven to 250 degrees.

    2. Beat the cream cheese until fluffy. Add the sugar and continue beating for a few minutes. Add the eggs one at a time, beating to combine. Then beat in remaining ingredients.

    3. Pour the filling into a springform pan that contains a cooled prebaked crust.

    4. Bake in preheated oven on the middle rack for 2 hours or until the top is golden and feels firm yet soft like a baked custard. Begin checking after 90 minutes. Internal temperature should be 150 degrees.

    5. Turn the oven off and leave the cheesecake inside for about an hour. Five minutes after shutting off the oven, run a sharp knife around the edge of the pan to help prevent cheesecake from cracking as it cools and settles.

    6. Remove cheesecake from the oven and cool completely before chilling in the refrigerator. Cover with toppings of your choice. Slice and serve.

    Each slice with graham cracker crust contains 581 calories, 44g total fat, 24g saturated fat, 0g trans fat, 205mg cholesterol, 373mg sodium, 42g carbohydrate, 1g fiber, 11g protein.

    Dairy-Free Cheesecake

    Find even more Gluten Free and Dairy Free Recipes at: http://www.glutenfreeandmore.com/issues/4_8/Gluten-Free-Cheesecake-Guide-2054-1.html.

  • Ignoring Congress Concerns over safety EPA approves expanded use of Combo Herbicide

    Ignoring Congress Concerns over safety EPA approves expanded use of Combo Herbicide

    EPA Approves Expanded Use of Dow’s “Enlist Duo” Herbicide.

    The Environmental Protection Agency has approved the special blending of the two herbicides developed by Dow. Enlist Duo, containing 2,4-D and glyphosate, for use on Dow’s 2nd generation GMO corn, soy and cotton. About 18 weeds have developed resistance to 2,4-D over the more than 50 years it has been in use. So the idea is to use both herbicides, with each one eradicating the weeds that the other one can’t. Beyond Pesticides states:

    These super weeds  now infest tens of millions of acres of U.S. farmland. However, independent and USDA scientists predict that the Enlist Duo “crop system” will only foster resistance to 2,4-D in addition to glyphosate, thus continuing the GE crop pesticide treadmill and escalating the cycle of more toxic pesticides in the environment. Additionally, the health effects of both 2,4-D and glyphosate are well documented. 2,4-D has been linked to  soft tissue sarcoma,  non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma  (NHL), neurotoxicity, kidney/liver damage, and harm to the reproductive system. Glyphosate has been  recently classified as a human carcinogen  based on laboratory studies by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March.”

    Thirty – five members of Congress expressed their concerns over the safety of the spray requesting “more information about EPA’s plan to reevaluate Enlist Duo’s health and environmental risks.”  

    “This is part of a vicious cycle that is leading to more potent, dangerous chemicals being widely used on crops across the United States,” said  Rep. Blumenauer. He continued, “With the rise of herbicide-resistant genetically modified crops, herbicides are more widely sprayed causing weeds to grow more resistant — ultimately, requiring the application of even stronger herbicides. EPA must take action to make sure products entering the market to be used on our food are safe for human health and the environment.”

    Meanwhile, Monsanto, the developer of Roundup Ready corn, is developing its own new generation of herbicide-resistant crops able to withstand a third weed killer.

    The USDA considers only whether the genetically engineered seeds represent a hazard to other crops; the EPA is responsible for overseeing the safety of herbicides used in agriculture. No agency looks at the bigger policy question of whether the nation is embarking on a potentially dangerous path toward creating ever-more-resistant weeds and spraying them and crops with larger and larger doses of stronger herbicides. That question should be answered before the country escalates the war out in the fields. -LA TIMES

    READ: Beyond Pesticides History behind the Question and Approval of Enlist Duo
     
    READ: Escalating the weed wars

    READ: Appendix citing concerns over safety of Enlist Duo Center for Food Safety