COVID-19 VACCINE MANUFACTURERS ARE EXEMPT FROM LIABILITY
According to the CDC, all vaccines have the potential to cause injury or death. On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of HHS invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness act (PREP Act) and declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency, warranting liability protection for covered countermeasures, which includes vaccination. If an individual is injured or killed by a COVID-19 vaccine, the manufacturer cannot be held liable per the PREP Act. The only possible recourse should you or a loved one suffer injury or death is to pursue compensation through the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, which has a difficult threshold for proving a relationship between an injury and the vaccine, a short statute of limitations, no avenue for appeals and doesn’t pay damages for pain or suffering.
The liability exempt status for vaccine manufacturers is not new. Pharmaceutical companies have enjoyed their liability free status for all vaccinations on the CDC schedule since the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. After large numbers of lawsuits were brought forth for injuries and deaths resulting from the DPT vaccine, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to protect pharmaceutical companies from liability specifically for vaccines. No other product or industry is protected from liability for injury and death in this way.
Without any liability, what incentive is there to ensure the vaccine is as safe as possible?
For the sake of discussion, pretend that masks actually matter in the spread of Covid. How much difference would they make, quantitatively?
Well, first you need to know the prevalence. If no one is sick there’s nothing to stop. So, for the sake of discussion, let’s assume a high number, let’s say 1%. One in 100 people are sick with Covid.
Someone sick with Covid is likely to be at home in bed for most of their illness. So let’s say that one in the 10 days they might be contagious they are around other people and potentially contagious.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t typically kiss every person I bump into in the grocery store. In other words, just because a person is contagious, doesn’t mean they will actually spread it to someone else. For the sake of discussion, let’s assume that if a person is contagious they could potentially spread it to one in ten of the people they interact with.
Let’s run the numbers so far: 1% x 10% x 10% = one in ten thousand people it might make a difference on any given day.
And by “might make a difference” we are talking if you have a comorbidity of one in twenty odds that you could hospitalized, and one in 140 that you could die from Covid.
So, even with a comorbidity, we are talking one in 200,000 the chance of hospitalization, and one in a million the chance of death.
Geeze, the “vaccine” is 500 times riskier than that.
And these numbers are far smaller for younger people, and people using any modicum of common sense.
And for this, we are littering the oceans with billions of pieces of plastic (far worse than straws), causing depression, loss of businesses, suicides, drug overdoses, and ill health in our population, and propagating an atmosphere of malaise across our society.
Quantitatively, the general use of masks sounds like a dumb idea to me.
Please join HFI at the steps of our Idaho State Capitol so we can burn these unconstitutional orders and mandates along with the unscientific masks. Health Freedom Idaho will provide coffee and hot cocoa at this event! Speaker Line Up includes Representative Dorthy MoonDarr Moon, Senator Christy Zito, and HFI’s Executive Directors Miste and Sara. HealthFreedomIdaho.or visit FreeIdaho.org for more info and to sign up to receive emails about the mask /proclamation burning! #medicalfreedom
There are locations throughout the state participating in this event. JOIN ONE! Make your presence known!
She died… while still at the vaccination site. “While seated in the observation area after the injection, the patient complained of feeling discomfort and while being evaluated by medical personnel, she lost consciousness,” he said. “Paramedics on scene began CPR almost immediately and continued, but she ultimately could not be revived.”
“Her death does not appear to be related to the vaccine,” it said.
mainstream media
Are Coroner’s the newest authorities in the Medical Cartel?
People are dying within minutes of this vaccine but “the coroner said” it didn’t have anything to do with the vaccines, so we are supposed to accept that as fact? Again… That’s not science. It’s religion. It’s weird because “the doctor said” that vaccines had nothing to do with regressive autism, but yet there are millions of stories (with plenty of documentation) to the contrary. Kids developing and speaking normally who regress IMMEDIATELY following vaccinations- losing spoken language, eye contact, and often motor skills. **Vaccine-induced autism settlement: https://www.prnewswire.com/…/court-awards-over-20…
Vaccines are the biggest cause of “coincidences” that I’ve ever seen in my entire life.
Put your thinking caps on, folks. People are dropping dead under an hour after receiving these vaccines (almost 700 people as of Friday), and you still believe the media. The media who literally just did that thing that toddlers do when they do something wrong, and you don’t even ask about it, and they tell you what they did by randomly saying they didn’t do it. (“I didn’t color on the wall!”)
That’s exactly what this headline is from the NY Post.
This is also gaslighting.
Woman drops dead after vaccine, but the vaccine had nothing to do with it. Sure, it didn’t…
Health Freedom Idaho is dedicated to relentlessly sharing information vital for people to have informed consent, protect personal medical information, and assist parents in asserting their parental rights. We aren’t afraid of sharing the truth, even when it goes against the narrative.
Recently Facebook has flagged posts as old as 5 years ago that accurately listed vaccine ingredients, revealed CDC statistics and medical journal reports that contradict the narrative. Facebook says people don’t ‘feel safe’ with the information shared on Health Freedom Idaho’s Page. Valentine’s day HFI disappeared after 5 years and 17,000 followers.
We are not surprised and in fact, wondered by ‘it took so long’. We are grateful that other social media platforms are standing for freedom of information.
We have the website you are reading now, as well as a backup site (coming soon) so that truth can be shared.
Want to know how you can help? Glad you asked.
Follow us on one of the many other platforms.
Share this site with family and friends.
Join HFI for $10 A YEAR
Subscribe to our email list to access to important time-sensitive information
**If you are the praying type we value prayer covering for the leadership, volunteers and our families. We know that there is more going on than basic censorship…
House Bill 140 MEDICAL CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT – Adds to existing law to prohibit discrimination against certain persons on the basis of their vaccination status and to prohibit state contracts with companies that engage in such discrimination.
In 2021, this is an important bill to protect bodily autonomy and privacy rights. Contact the Chairman of House Commerce and Human Resources to hear the ‘Medical Consumer Protection Act,’.
This bill will not get a hearing and will die if the people do not get loud about how crucial this is.”
H 140 is fundamentally a Civil Rights Bill protecting employees’ rights to conscience. H 140 is a bipartisan bill that deserves the support of all legislators and Idahoans, regardless of party or religious affiliation.
DENIED EMPLOYMENT? FIRED? DIDN’T CONSIDER A JOB DUE TO VACCINE MANDATES FOR THE WORKPLACE? THIS BILL IS FOR YOU!
House Bill 140 It prohibits an employer, who is contracted with the state from discriminating against an employee or an applicant based on their immunization status.
If you have been fired, not hired, quit a job, been harassed/coerced or chose not to apply for or accept a job because of your vaccination status, share your story with committee members and your legislators. If you are concerned that the profession you are currently in may start mandating vaccines as a requirement for you to keep your job, share your concern.
It’s the fifth week of the 2021 Legislative session. Many of our liberty-minded legislators have sent out newsletters letting citizens know their frustration at the games being played and the lack of desire from many in the legislature to stop the overreach of the Governor. Last week the governor threw a childish tantrum fit chastising your representative’s efforts to remove his 30-day ’emergency power’ that has now moved into the 11 month.
Remember that unlike the ‘proclamation’ power that is being wielded by our governor, the legislature has a specific constitutional process to follow.
A bill is created
A print hearing is held
A full committee hearing is held
The bill moves to the floor session for a vote by the entire Senate or House
This process continues in the other body, Senate or House
CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATORS:
You can find your legislators by visiting the Idaho Legislature website. Please note the Who Is My Legislator? link on the top right of the main page. You can enter your address and zip code so the website can identify your Senator and Representatives. Click on your Senator’s or Representative’s picture and you will see all the contact information you need to get in touch with them. Click on the email address and you can send them an email right there. Another good place to go is the List of Legislators in the Senate and House. You can see bios for the legislators and click the links to subscribe to their weekly newsletters.
CONTACT EMAIL LISTS:
Senate | House | Health Committee House | Health Committee Senate
2021 Bills
This year many bills are being pushed through that aren’t representative of the people’s voice but instead that of special interests.
Here are some bills that Health Freedom Idaho is following that are specifically written in a attempt to protect parental rights, preserve liberty and restore our republic form of government with balanced branch powers.
Some of these bills are ‘foot in the door’ type of bills. In an effort to get the bill printed and heard in committee the bill doesn’t affect ‘too much change’. There IS a possibility that the bill can be amended in committee. Listen to more about the bills in this video update by Sarah Clendenon and Miste Karlfeldt. https://youtu.be/lmw3xXDKNSk
House Bills:
H1 Governor’s Powers in Emergency House State Affairs Jason A. Monks (R) JMonks@house.idaho.gov This proposed legislation restores the separation and balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. Specifically, this legislation ensures that all Idahoans have the right to work, provide for their families and contribute to the economy during any emergency disaster declaration. The legislation also limits the length of emergency disaster declarations to a maximum of 30 days unless extended by a legislative concurrent resolution.
From Bill’s Statement of Purpose: The Reasonable Childhood Independence Act. Currently, Idaho’s open-ended definition of neglect leaves parents exposed to frivolous allegations of neglect or even unnecessary actions taken by authorities. As the law stands, parents could get into trouble just for letting their kids play outside. This Act will protect families across the economic spectrum by affirming parents’ rights.
This legislation further defines Idaho’s Parental Rights statutes to state that emergency order, disaster declaration, etc. cannot be deemed a compelling government interest that would allow abridgment of parental rights as described in 32-1013.
*currently the health districts have been giving the ‘authority to do anything’ in the name of public health. This is an attempt to “reduce” some of their powers.
H 33 PUBLIC HEALTH – Amends existing law to provide for review of a district board of health’s actions, decisions, or orders, to provide that first and second violations of public health laws shall be infractions, and to provide that order of quarantine or isolation shall be effective no more than 30 days unless an extension is approved by affected counties or cities.
We would like to highlight that the first and second violations of a ‘public health law’ shall be infractions. The third violation is a misdemeanor with a $1000 fine. *think about this in relation to mask mandates
An order of isolation or quarantine shall be effective no more than 30 days unless an extension is approved by affected counties or cities.
Amends, repeals, and adds to existing law to update the Idaho Pharmacy Act (to bring into compliance with federal law). Allows pharmacists to “repackage” drugs. Destroy vaccine inserts!!!! Allows a middleman (like Amazon) to deliver drugs.
This legislation establishes provisions regarding mandates and use of force with any vaccination, immunization, genetic modulation, or inoculation of any person.
Amends and adds to existing law to clarify who has the authority to close schools or limit school activities or programs for the purpose of stopping the spread of infectious disease. Note: This one clarifies that the area’s health district has complete dictatorial powers in a health emergency without having to prove the existence of a health emergency or have science backing their claim.
RS 28413 (bill number and text not yet available) was introduced this morning by House Minority Leader Rep. Ilana Rubel (D-Boise) and Rep. Mike Kingsley (R-Lewiston) in the House Health and Welfare Committee. Called the “Sgt. Kitzhaber Medical Cannabis Act” it is a medically regulated cannabis bill that would move from a Schedule I illegal drug in Idaho to a Schedule II drug, available only by prescription in strictly limited and packaged amounts, for patients 21 or older with certain specific diagnoses, including cancer, ALS, AIDS, wasting syndrome, Crohn’s disease, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, debilitating seizures, and terminal illness. Most patients could be prescribed only up to 2 grams of THC per month; those with cancer or terminal illness could be prescribed up to 10 grams per month. No growing or production of cannabis in Idaho would be permitted.
House RESOLUTIONS
The resolutions sound good on paper but have no authority to effect change or END the state of emergency. Listen to the video from Miste and Sarah for further clarification.
HCR1 Resolution to End Emergency House State Affairs HCR2 Gatherings and Group Size Senate State Affairs HJR1 Legislature Calling Sessions Senate State Affairs
Senate Bills:
S1001 Disaster, Governor Powers Senate State Affairs
S1002 Disaster, Governor Spending Powers Senate State Affairs
S1003 Governor Powers, Martial Law Senate State Affairs
Senate RESOLUTION
SCR101 Terminating Disaster Emergency Senate State Affairs
Mandatory Adjournment Date: This requires the legislature to adjourn on the last Friday in March. Most legislators do not want a full-time legislature but prefer to adjourn expeditiously to get back to their families and jobs. As there are ongoing emergency declarations and the state is receiving billions of dollars from the federal government, the legislature should probably consider staying in session this year. Should the legislature adjourn no matter what, or remain flexible enough to handle the ongoing flood of federal funding and new executive orders?
SJR101 and S1017 grants authority to an unelected federal alphabet soup bureaucracy over drug policy in the state. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
At least one Republican Senator, Christy Zito (Hammett), spoke against the measure. Zito said that the legislature can’t legislate temperance and morality but said she is personally against using recreational drugs.
Zito went on to say,
I just think that as we approach this, we need to be careful that we honor the choice of the individual, that we are careful not to combine policy with [the] constitution.
Senator Christy Zito
Sen. C. Scott Grow (R-Eagle) the bill’s sponsor said the measure was necessary to protect Idaho’s families. Grow listed off a number of reasons he is bringing the proposal forward.
This proposes an amendment to the Idaho Constitution prohibiting the production, manufacture, transportation, sale, delivery, dispensing, distribution, possession, or use of certain psychoactive drugs.
Grow listed as one of the reasons,
This amendment will allow Idahoans to choose for themselves whether they want to live in a drug-free state, free from drug culture, or not.
Senator C. Scott Grow
Grow continued with seven total reasons and said that burdens and risks to law enforcement. Grow addressed a number of questions in his opening statement, including saying that having the FDA listed in the amendment is not a concern.
Grow also said that CBD oil would not be illegal under SJR 101 citing several attorneys he had spoken to. (read more here: Idaho Dispatch )
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Keep in mind that this is a constitutional amendment so the legislature is voting whether or not to add this to the ballot for voters.
What they don’t tell you is that the explanation of the issue on the ballot is essentially a commercial for the way they want you to vote. You would think that the information on the ballot would weigh out the pros and cons in such a way that the people, (with a pencil in hand) could make an educated vote, but it doesn’t.
This is how we got stuck with Medicaid expansion that ID cannot afford. Why would we change our Constitution to say psychoactive drugs are never allowed in ID unless the FDA says so?
Shouldn’t Idahoans have the opportunity to consider what is best for our great state?
What this amendment says is if the FDA says they want to have a “documented clinical investigation” using psychoactive drugs (Page 2 lines 9 & 10) on Idahoans, that’s ok.
But, if someone fighting cancer needs to use it medicinally that’s not ok?!? If passed, the amendment would effectively and permanently close the door for marijuana legalization via citizen’s ballot initiative.
Absolute waste of time, money, and resources. We should be focusing on keeping this state free instead of fueling the pockets of big pharma and changing the constitution to make something “more” illegal than it already is. You are punishing veterans and others who need medical marijuana and any other medications in the future to combat continuing pain.
Facebook Comment against SJR101
We need to keep the federal government from dictating what is good for Idahoans! Let’s keep Idaho sovereign.
Another federal supremacy bill. This bill mirrors the FDA controlled substances scheduling and rescheduling decisions for 2020 including placing synthetic cannabinoids in schedule 1 while placing opiates in schedule 2. Idahoans should be making decisions for ID. Period.
***The 10th Amendment to the US Constitution says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Let’s remind our senators of the 10th amendment and tell them to vote NO on S1017.
Senate email list https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-senate-email-list/. ***This bill will likely be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow.
Starting Feb1 Idaho Health Districts will be targeting the more than 269,000 Idahoans 65 and older that will be “eligible” to get the vaccine. Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent. The laws in Idaho require that a person receiving medical procedures receive informed consent. The new “emergency use” vaccine has been manufactured in record time without long term data. During the ACIP meeting concerns were raised about recommending the vaccine to seniors when there were NO TRIALS conducted to determine safety or effectiveness especially on those who are medically fragile.
When a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory committee voted in December to recommend residents of long-term care facilities should be at the front of the line — with health care providers — for Covid-19 vaccines, the lone dissenting voice came from a researcher who studies vaccines in older adults.
Helen Keipp Talbot — who is known by her middle name — raised serious concerns during the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices about using the vaccines in the frail elderly, noting there are no data yet to suggest the vaccines work in this population.
All the U.S.-based Phase 3 trials of Covid vaccines have to include people 65 and older. But none has specifically tested the vaccines in people who are in long-term care. One can’t assume findings in people over age 65 who are healthy enough to be accepted for a clinical trial are indicative of everyone in that demographic, she said.
Do Recipients realize that Vaccine Reactions are Underreported?
“Underreporting” is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events.”
This system has been shown to reflect ONLY 1% of actual reactions!
The technology was created for an automatic surveillance system for vaccine reactions but was abandoned when it revealed that vaccine reactions/ adverse events were 100 fold what was reported in the voluntary system.
Numerous reviews of VAERS have found that only a tiny fraction of vaccine adverse events are reported. For example, an HHS-funded review of vaccine adverse events over a three-year period by Harvard Medical School involving 715,000 patients found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” Find out more at Vaccine Safety Paper fromIcandecide.com
#NVIC #VaccineFreedom #InformedConsent
Do Recipients realize that families sharing their Vaccine Reactions are been Censored?
This whistleblower at a care facility for the elderly says his patients, the residents at the care home he works at, are suddenly dying or losing their ability to walk, to speak, etc.. They did not have any deaths at their care home in all of 2020. And now 14 since they started giving the vaccine.
What if YOU have a reaction to the vaccine? What if its discovered that it wasn’t as safe or effective as they claimed? You can’t sue. You suffer the damage and it’s all on you and your family.
An experimental vaccine and pharmaceutical companies are protected from liability regarding the COVID-19 vaccines.
“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” Dunn was quoted as saying by the CNBC.
They protected the vaccine manufacturer, the administrator, and anyone involved with creating or injecting the vaccine from liability. The Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Alex M. Azar III, has granted the companies selling and those involved in virtually any other activity related to any COVID-19 vaccine immunity from liability for any injuries caused by these products. Prior to his current position, Secretary Azar was a senior executive for a major pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly and Company, from 2007 to 2017.
Medical Experts & Opponents Faceoff on Senator Sanders’ Next Podcast – Is the COVID-19 Vaccine Safe? http://ow.ly/wOOW30ruuLz The podcast will premiere on Senator Sanders’ YouTube Channel on Friday, January 29, 2021 at 5 p.m. EST at the link below. https://youtu.be/M-ZhojSfvEo
They say it can take months for some of the adverse reactions to show up….. who knows? Even years. That’s what happens when you unleash an untested vaccine on the population…..
Purposes — Application. (1) The primary purposes of this chapter are: (a) To provide and codify Idaho law concerning consent for the furnishing of hospital, medical, dental, surgical and other health care, treatment or procedures, and concerning what constitutes an informed consent for such health care, treatment or procedures; and. (b) To provide certainty and clarity in the law of medical consent in the furtherance of high standards of health care and its ready availability in proper cases.
If you don’t make it in time to do a virtual testimony – be sure to email the committee your comments and concerns. Here’s the link to the committee members to email them your concerns:
Message from Health Freedom Idaho Executive Director, Miste Karlfeldt:
I called the secretary of the committee because I found the description to be vague. He sent me the talking points that were sent to the other speakers. He mentioned that the sheriff’s office will be speaking regarding liability. This is very important for defending the republic and our voices MUST be heard.
1.) We must not allow the government to compel behavior through fear. If only the businesses who follow the direction of the government have some kind of protection from liability it exposes small businesses that don’t want to follow the government’s edict to lawsuits. This will effectively do away with businesses that do not want to do the bidding of the government. This is not about protecting small businesses it Is about compelling behavior of the businesses.
Said another way, a statute that protects businesses from liability only IF they comply with government orders is using society to control and exclude those who choose another path. Just as with the mask mandates, any government entity can “order” businesses to require proof of vaccination with a coronavirus vaccine in order to enter their business and there will be nothing we can do about it. And even if you are injured or killed by this brand new, experimental vaccine. COVID vaccine manufacturers and those who administer them are LIABILITY FREE. That’s right, you are on your own if you have an adverse reaction.
comments made in Special Session August 2020.
2.) There would be no way to prove in court where you contracted a virus. Liability protection is completely unnecessary and a waste of the state’s time and resources.
3.) If made a permanent fixture in code, are they going to have a new bill for every single virus? This does not make sense.
You can testify in person or online at 2 pm. They expect this will be highly contentious as it was during the special session so be sure to reserve your time to speak. Click on “Register To Testify” if you wish to testify via zoom.
If passed, the amendment would effectively and permanently close the door for marijuana legalization via citizen’s ballot initiative.
Senate email list https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-senate-email-list/. ***This bill will likely be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow. 
You can testify in person or online at 2 pm. They expect this will be highly contentious as it was during the special session so be sure to reserve your time to speak. Click on