Have you read or heard that there are an estimated 36,000 deaths in the United States, each year from the flu? Did you see the newest propaganda from the CDC citing the 78,000 excepted flu deaths?
“[This number differs] wildly from the sober tallies recorded on death certificates — by law, every certificate must show a cause — and reported by the official agencies that collect and keep vital statistics.”
“According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year…”And even that number could be too high.
A British Medical Journal study has revealed that the number of people confirmed as having the flu virus is grossly exaggerated by the U.S. government.
“Only about 15-20 percent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus — the other 80-85 percent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done.”
During the 2003 flu season ‘the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,’ Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio.
“The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine.
‘It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.’”
…despite the evidence that the influenza virus is responsible for only a small number of cases of flu-like symptoms (aka “influenza-like illness”).
Almost 2 decades of deceit
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.” Boom.
You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
“The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still.”
From a 2009 report published in “Clinical Evidence”, of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Tom Jefferson found that the portion of influenza-like illness that is caused by the influenza virus maybe just 7 percent of cases. And therefore, the influenza virus is actually a rare cause of influenza-like illness (ILI).
Unfortunately, even though the data that Jefferson and his team at Cochrane have been analyzing for the past two decades has continued to support their findings on the (lack of) impact of influenza vaccines on ILI, their research is being ignored and was actually removed from the BMJ website.
In a 2018 article on the Cochrane website, Jefferson writes:
“We await to see whether anyone has the interest or the courage to develop effective ways to control upper respiratory viral syndromes. Meanwhile, our reviews will remain as a testimonial to the scientific failure of industry and governments to address the most important clinical outcomes for patients.”
Pregnant mothers and their unborn children are the targets of vaccination experimentation. The CDC (a vaccine patent holder) encourages vaccines at each pregnancy. Vaccine manufacturers state on their inserts that vaccines haven’t been tested safe in pregnancy. Scientists then publish studies that exclude negative data so they can claim vaccine safety. The ACIP, which is supposed to provide safety recommendations for the vaccine schedule, ‘believes’ vaccines are safe in pregnancy, but they need 5-year data to determine safety.
Medical Billing Records Reveal Fetal Death After Vaccinations
Meanwhile, pregnant Mothers injected under the guise that vaccines have been proven safe for their unborn child when, in reality, they have not. Medical bill records reveal that many mothers have suffered a miscarriage, fetal demise/death, immediately following vaccination. This data was excluded from a “study” to determine vaccine safety.
Exclude Fetal Deaths and Call Vaccinations Safe. How Can This Be Considered – SCIENCE?
How can you study Adverse Birth Outcomes if you exclude fetal deaths? WalterOrenstein, MD (et al) published a “study” that used the remaining data to prove that TDaP vaccines are ‘safe’ in pregnancy.
“We also excluded pregnancies with non–live birth outcomes (stillborn, spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion, trophoblastic disease, and ectopic pregnancy) because we did not have the resources to access medical records to confirm the timing of these outcomes in relation to vaccination, which could result in inaccurate findings.”
Death from measles had already dropped 99.96% BEFORE vaccines came onto market so what really saved us from death and disease? Was it the vaccines and the vaccination program, or was it something else?
Michelle Maher Ford of the Vaccine-Injury Awareness League gives us an overview of what really saved us from dying of measles, pertussis, chickenpox, and so, so much more.
Extremists will target others who don’t comply with their ideology. The Vaccine Extremists will target anyone who skips a single liability-free vaccine by personal choice — using mainstream media to consistently spout anti-health freedom and dehumanizing messages contributing to the climate of extreme intolerance. They then utilize brute force to ensure compliance with their ideology in the name of ‘science’ and public health. They eliminate access to any healthcare for children who don’t comply with the childhood schedule of 70 liability-free vaccines recommended by vaccine-patent holding CDC.
https://youtu.be/H2YSB9MS1y8
We have entered into an Era of Vaccine Extremism. This is not a conspiracy theory rather it’s based on recent events.
Consider the following:
Government tracking: CDC tracking on a federal level, State level tracking (IDAHO tracking system: IRIS is a secure statewide immunization information system that will track, forecast, and help remind patients when immunizations are due.
Media Encourages Message of Hate Speech and Violence against a minority group. For instance, a recent article in the Washington Post is titled, “Anti-vaxxers are dangerous. Make them face isolation, fines, arrests. Even more egregious, a 2017 Boston Herald op-ed suggested that anti-vaxxers should be hanged. Amazingly, they still haven’t taken their post down, even though it encourages hatred and violence against a minority group. Outlets like the Boston Globe continued onward with concerning rhetoric, including the more recent story headline: “Mounting a ground war against anti-vaxxers“. (As reported by GreenMedInfo Blog)
Elected officials and their staff are also contributing to the climate of extreme intolerance spouting anti-health freedom and dehumanizing messages. Maral Farsi, governor Newsom’s own staff member, recently posted this message to Twitter:
This is not an innocent message; it is a public post made by a public servant.
What does she mean by “oxygen thieves”? According to the Urban dictionary: “a person so useless on this planet that the mere fact of them breathing is a waste of oxygen.”
Violence of this sort only makes sense when you understand how profoundly mislead we are today. The official narrative is that vaccines are unilterally “safe and effective,” and therefore those who are not vaccinated must “spread disease” (i.e. they have no natural immunity or protection without medical intervention). Were the “science settled,” as commonly claimed, and the act of vaccinating equivalent to bona fide immunity, the increasingly violent rhetoric against those who will not abide by the CDC’s vaccination schedule would at least appear grounded in something other than brutally misinformed opinion or pseudoscience.
Larry Cook – StopMandatoryVaccination
Asking the Unanswerable Questions
Access to information regarding vaccines has become a hot topic of censorship. Information, statistics and basic risk versus benefit analysis of vaccinations are getting harder to research.
For example, parents seeking to find out how many children died in the last measles outbreak in 2019 are redirected to the CDC website. However, after scouring page after page there is NO INDICATION how many U.S. children died in the highly contagious measles outbreak.
*It was ZERO measles deaths in the last 2 decades for those still looking for the answer.
Health officials, doctors, and mainstream media claim that 1 in 1000 children will die from measles but before the introduction of the measles vaccine, they claimed the number was 1 in 10,000. Thanks to public health measures such as sanitation and clean drinking water as well as access to healthcare and nutrition, no children have died from measles in the last 2 decades.
We are entering a time in history where we are not even allowed to ASK. They not only want to silence the discussion completely, instead of answering our questions, but they’re also going the extra mile to learn how to combat our hesitancy*. Isn’t it easier to just… answer the question? Perhaps that’s because it’s hard to convince people who are awake to the LIE – that poison is suddenly not poison just because it’s in their FDA-approved syringe.
Some of the many unanswered questions:
Why aren’t vaccines tested according to the gold standard with double-blind placebos?
Why are they the only product that is one size fits all and zero manufacturer liability?
If vaccines are so safe, why is there zero manufacturer liability?
Why is the US the only country that gives the Hep B vaccine on the first day of life?
Why is it that after vaccine manufacturers received a liability-free pass, has the vaccine schedule exploded to more than 70 doses of vaccines?
Why does the US give the chickenpox vaccine, when the UK and many other countries don’t, because it’s been proven to cause shingles?
Many scientists have raised the alarm on the amount of aluminum in vaccines. Why doesn’t the CDC address their concerns?
Why did the ACIP committee recently approve the new Hep B adjuvant despite the safety signal of a myocardial infarction?
Why are all four major vaccine makers (Merck, Sanofi, GSK and Pfizer), who are all convicted of fraud, given a free pass when it comes to vaccines? Merck created Vioxx and is currently being sued for the Shingles vaccine, MMR vaccine, and Gardasil, and yet their products can be mandated for school entry?
Why do we give 26 vaccines in the first year of life to infants with immature immune systems that cannot mount an immune response to vaccines?
Where are the safety studies on vaccines that were supposed to be conducted and submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure the vaccine’s safety?
When people refuse to look critically at medical research, it only proves that vaccine extremism is a religion.
– Ashley Everly toxicologist
Liberty Stealing Legislation on the Rise
We must combat vaccine extremism in America. We cannot afford to allow this failing public health report card, which has gotten worse with every new vaccine added to the government mandated list, to go unchallenged any longer.
It is going to take a lot of muscle and money to turn this sinking ship around before we all drown. Waking people up is the first step. Getting engaged and voting at the polls to elect men and women with integrity to defend our freedoms, and un-electing those who threaten our freedom, is the second step.
Barbara Lowe Fischer
Only 18 bad vaccine bills passed out of the 137 that NVIC opposed in the 2019 legislative session.
While the bills to remove or restrict vaccine exemptions got the bulk of the sensationalized press, only 3 of the 22 bills across 17 states to eliminate vaccine exemptions passed, and two of the 18 bills attempting to restrict exemptions passed.
Individual citizen involvement in the legislative process, through personal communications and education of legislators, continues year after year to make a significant impact on the outcomes of vaccine-related bills in state legislatures. NVIC predicts that the increased attack on exemptions and informed consent rights this year will drive even more U.S. citizens to get more involved in the legislative process at every level in the years to come.
So, while Health Freedom Idaho may be a small and growing organization, we are mighty in spirit. We are here every day, year after year, monitoring and reporting liberty stealing policy, statues, and rules; educating and encouraging everyone to fight in support of parental rights and natural rights and against vaccine extremism.
The chickenpox vaccine wasn’t created to reduce mortality it was designed to make money for manufacturers and ‘save money’ for parents. However, the risks from the vaccine are hardly disclosed by pediatricians and hidden by health departments whose goal is only to ‘increase vaccination rates’. The vaccine doesn’t guarantee ‘protection’ and even carries a risk of SPREADING the disease. Some people react with chickenpox FROM the vaccine. The adverse health outcomes include SERIOUS life-threating reactions including meningitis and encephalitis. Studies indicate that some children will suffer from SHINGLES as a direct result of being vaccinated with the chickenpox vaccine.
Where’s the warning?!
Vaccine manufacturers warn the vaccinated to STAY AWAY from immunocompromised and premature babies for SIX WEEKS to avoid POSSIBLE TRANSMISSION of the chickenpox disease. It’s the vaccine-injected spreading the disease. Take a moment to read a vaccine insert from Merck page 3 clause 5.4
For everyone trying to protect the immunocompromised, after you get this shot you aren’t supposed to come into contact with high risk individuals for six weeks.
In addition to the vaccine spreading the disease, the vaccine might not protect FROM disease!
Merck also says, “The duration of protection from varicella infection after vaccination with VARIVAX is unknown.
Vaccination with VARIVAX may not result in protection of all healthy, susceptible children, adolescents, and adults.
A boost in antibody levels has been observed in vaccinees following exposure to wild-type varicella, which could account for the apparent long-term persistence of antibody levels in these studies.” https://www.merckvaccines.com/products/varivax
Adverse Reactions to the Chicken Pox vaccine now include meningitis!
The chickenpox vaccine Varivax has been approved to add “meningitis” to the package insert! “We have approved your request dated April 20, 2018, to supplement your Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted under section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) for Varicella Virus Vaccine Live (VARIVAX) manufactured at your West Point, Pennsylvania (b) (4) facilities to revise the package insert to include the term “meningitis” in Section 6.2 Post-Marketing Experience and to clarify previously reported terms of “encephalitis” and “herpes zoster.”” source: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM623955.pdf
Study Show Adverse Reaction following the Chicken Pox vaccine could include SHINGLES?
In some immunized children, the virus reactivates within a few months to a few years to cause the dermatomal exanthem known as herpes zoster (shingles).” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/30628536/
WHAT DID YOUR PEDIATRICIAN SAY?
You have the responsibility to become fully informed about vaccines and the right to make voluntary choices about whether or not to risk your life or your child’s life with a vaccine or any other procedure a medical doctor recommends. The more educated you become about vaccines, the more empowered you will become and the better able you will be to stand up for your right to informed consent to medical risk-taking.
Do you realize that your pediatrician is YOUR EMPLOYEE? S/he is supposed to work FOR YOU and NOT for the pharmaceutical companies pushing their liability-free medical products.
In Idaho, your doctor has a legal responsibility to provide you complete informed consent and advise you of your vaccine exemptions.Immunizations are not mandatory and may be refused on religious or other grounds. The parent or guardian is entitled to an accurate explanation of the complications known to follow such immunization. Idaho Code § 39-4804.
Did your pediatrician warn you to keep your child away from premature infants and immunocompromised individuals for six weeks to avoid transmitting the disease?
The discussions…
My pediatrician asked me where I get my vaccine information. I told her the manufacturer insert. She said, “There’s a lot of stuff going around on the internet.” I said, “Yeah, like package inserts.”🤷♀️
At my child’s well check visit I asked my pediatrician about abortion-tainted vaccines. He told me they don’t use aborted fetal DNA in vaccines anymore.
“Really?” I said as I GOOGLED the CDC website and showed him. “Vaccines haven’t been reformulated. DNA from aborted fetuses is still in there.”
He had nothing to say. He had NO IDEA. I printed off the excipient list directly from the CDC and delivered it when I picked up the copies of my children’s medical records. Then, I FIRED HIM!
Health Freedom Idaho believes that the ultimate responsibility to protect the health and the welfare of children lies with the parents. As primary stakeholders, parents must be free from politicians and government employees who limit medical choices or withhold information. Children are not one size fits all and as the primary caregivers PARENTS are in the best position to sort through all of the options for their children and make an informed decision.
Health Freedom Idaho
A vaccine designed to save money – not lives.
Chickenpox – a Benign Childhood Illness experienced by the entire population as children PRIOR to 1995 vaccine introduction.
CDC reports there were 3,700,000 cases of chickenpox cases EACH YEAR prior to the vaccine and that there were 100 U.S. deaths each year (50 children and 50 adults)* the majority of those deaths had compromised immune systems or other health problems
Before the vaccine, the chance of complications resulting in death from chicken pox was .00002702 <source>1
Dr. Arthur Lavin, Department of Pediatrics, St. Luke’s Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, presented concerns that “argue strongly against the licensure of varicella vaccine for healthy children.” Lavin asserted: “[Chicken pox] is not major in the sense of disease mortality or morbidity.
The vaccine was created on the body of aborted human beings. Many Idaho parents ‘opt-out’ of this vaccine for moral objections and because they are away the risk of adverse reactions to the disease is minimal.
Statins. Another drug disaster. A new study finds the chemical war against cholesterol using statin drugs was justified through statistical deception and the cover-up of over 300 adverse health effects documented in the biomedical literature.
The cholesterol-lowering drugs have been found to be worthless, or worse when it comes to heart health.
There are at least 300 adverse health effects evident in the published literature so far, with at least 28 distinct modes of toxicity, including:
If you look at absolute risk, statin drugs benefit just 1 percent of the population. This means that out of 100 people treated with the drugs, one person will have one less heart attack. This doesn’t sound so impressive, so statin supporters use a different statistic called relative risk. Just by making this statistical sleight of hand, statins suddenly become beneficial for 30-50 percent of the population.
As STATS at George Mason University explained, “An important feature of relative risk is that it tells you nothing about the actual risk.”12
Beyond the known fact that statin drugs deplete the body of two essential nutrients: coenzyme Q10 and selenium, they are also highly myotoxic and neurotoxic. Because the heart is one of the most nerve-saturated muscles in the human body, these two modes of toxicity combined represent a ‘perfect storm’ of cardiotoxicity – a highly ironic fact considering statin drugs are promoted as having ‘life-saving’ cardioprotective properties. <read more here>
The Cholesterol Myth
Having high cholesterol may be a worry that you don’t need to have. Instead of potentially risking your health by taking cholesterol-lowering drugs, you can maintain your cholesterol levels by simply following these eight steps recommended by Dr. Mercola:
Reduce, with the plan of eliminating, grains and sugars in your diet. It is vitally important to eliminate gluten-containing grains and sugars, especially fructose.
Replace harmful vegetable oils and synthetic trans fats with healthy fats, such as olive oil, butter, avocado, pastured eggs and coconut oil (remember olive oil should be used cold only, use coconut oil for cooking and baking).
Include fermented foods in your daily diet. This will not only optimize your intestinal microflora, which will boost your overall immunity, it will also introduce beneficial bacteria into your mouth. Poor oral health is another powerful indicator of increased heart disease risk.
Optimize your vitamin D levels, ideally through appropriate sun exposure as this will allow your body to also create vitamin D sulfate—another factor that may play a crucial role in preventing the formation of arterial plaque.
Exercise regularly. Make sure you incorporate high-intensity interval exercises, which also optimize your human growth hormone (HGH) production.
September 2019, 5G went live in Boise, Idaho. Verison Wireless went around the public concern about health and installed emitters without public input. Families living in and around the city have expressed concerns about the impact of this untested technology on their families. EMFs effects are scientifically documented by independent labs worldwide. Wireless technology is engrained in our culture. In this modern age, it’s not unusual to see a 2-year-old operate a tablet with finesse. Kids are asking for smartphones at younger and younger ages. But are they safe? What can we do to protect our most vulnerable?
EMF Safety Research
The truth is, there is plenty of unbiased research on the health effects of EMFs. You can find over 4,000 studies alone at Bioinitiative.org. Additional studies can be found at the World Health Organization and the I.A.R.C. (International Agency for Cancer). Both the WHO and the I.A.R.C. have classified wireless radiation as a Group 2B carcinogen, indicating that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are possible human carcinogens. For reference, this category also includes glyphosate, lead, gasoline, and engine exhaust.
EMF Exposure
We are literally swimming in EMF soup daily thanks to the demand for “smart” everything. Besides cell phones and tablets we are getting exposed via modems, routers and router extenders, smart TVs, gaming devices, baby monitors, Bluetooth devices, and even robotic vacuums. Not to mention cell towers and smart meters.
Studies have shown that anything over 30 microWatts per square meter (mWm²) has the potential to cause DNA damage. Anything over 1 milligauss on a Gauss meter is causing dirty electricity. According to the science, safe levels for adult exposure to EMFs are a maximum of 30 mW/m2 and safe levels for a child are much lower at a maximum of 10 mW/m2. Safe levels for children are much lower because their blood-brain barrier is still forming so they absorb twice the amount of EMFs than adults do.
Unfortunately, the devices listed above often show readings well over 2,000 mW/m2. Now we need to ask ourselves…What are these frequencies doing to the body?
Possible Health Effects
Common health effects associated with EMF exposure include fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, depression, anxiety, headaches, immune system imbalances, cell damage (DNA and free radical damage), and evidence for Alzheimers and cancer risk.
Even scarier is that our future generations are at risk. A woman’s eggs have 10 times the DNA damage compared to any other DNA in the body. Our future grandchildren are in our wombs with our baby girls, making it even more important to be safe with wireless technology. (Source: Dr. Berrie Trower, Physicist, UK Royal Navy)
Simple Tips on Minimizing Exposure
Before we discuss EMF protection, let’s talk about some of the simple ways you can be a smarter tech user:
Never hold the cell phone against your head. Use a speakerphone or a wired headset to talk. Avoid wireless earbuds.
Use airplane mode as much as possible, especially if children are handling your device.
Avoid keeping your cell phone in your pocket or bra.
Never let children play with a smartphone or tablet on their lap.
Never sleep with a cell phone or tablet next to your bed.
EMF Protection
What do you do if you can’t live without your device? What if your child uses a tablet at school? And what about those who are electrically sensitive that need to be able to survive in an increasingly wireless world? That’s when personal and device protection comes in very handy.
Thankfully there are more and more options available to help us in the marketplace. How do we know what actually works? One great option is to use earth-based solutions to harmonize yourself and your wireless devices.
Products from EMF Harmony are tested extensively with live blood microscopy testing, mold testing, Acugraph testing, Avatar testing, Muscle testing/Applied kinesiology, and client testimonials to determine effectiveness. They are not designed to block EMFs, but rather harmonize them by using proprietary materials that filter the EMF and show a favorable body response when exposed to WiFi, A/C, powerlines, automobile EMFs, electrical appliances, cell phones, cell towers, and computers and laptops.
Clients report back better sleep, less brain fog, fewer headaches, and a sense of calm.
Thank you for EMF Harmony for authoring this post. If you have questions about EMF protection, contact Ryan directly at emfharmony.com
In the past three years, Health Freedom Idaho has grown. HFI has successfully pushed back against liberty stealing statutes and rules, particularly those surrounding vaccines, and in the process made their presence known. Due to this, the media is beginning to take notice.
We have been told that an Idaho Statesman’s investigative reporter, Audrey Dutton, is writing a feature story on Health Freedom Idaho. In addition to requesting information from Health Freedom Idaho leadership directly, she made public records requests to obtain the names and contact information of members and individuals who testified at the recent rules hearings. She has been sending requests for interviews to Health Freedom Idaho members. We want our members to know that Dutton obtained this information through a public records request, NOT from HFI.
Ms. Dutton has publicly stated her bias against parents who opt out of some or all vaccinations. She has determined that the vaccination debate is settled despite hundreds of published peer-reviewed studies that call the safety and efficacy of vaccines into question and despite the demonstrable lies and distortions uttered by vaccine proponents. Her opinion is that parents opposed to some or all vaccination are unjustifiably fearful and/or misinformed.
Public Post from Dutton’s Facebook Page
They like to say, “The science is settled. Vaccines are safe and effective.” But is science ever settled? Ask some real scientists and I’m sure they will tell you that science is never settled but is always ongoing. It takes a great amount of arrogance to claim you know it all and there is nothing more to the story.
Yes, some parents opt out of some or all vaccines for their children and recently their voices have grown stronger as parents educate themselves on the matter and realize their right to direct the upbringing of their children is being threatened all across the nation through draconian legislation and more. Bureaucrats in Idaho have already trampled parental rights codified in Idaho statute.
Why Do Parents Hesitate to Vaccinate?
Ms. Dutton has been emailing Health Freedom Idaho members asking for an interview about their vaccine choices. But why would anyone want to talk with her when she’s already determined that those who decline vaccines are simply doing so out of fear and ignorance. And isn’t a parent’s desire to protect his or her children the most important reason to decline a medical intervention admitted to cause injury and death?
“…many parents in Idaho are opting out of measles/mumps/rubella vaccinations for their children…. The reason they balk usually isn’t religious or because of underlying health problems. It’s fear.”
One is left to wonder the basis of this assumption and why it matters. A parent has the natural right to care for their child as they see fit. They can choose whether to vaccinate or not – for any reason, or for no reason at all. That said, religion, underlying health problems, documented scientific dangers of vaccines, bad experiences of friends and loved ones, and fear are five justifiable reasons to question whether the potential benefits of vaccinating are worth the risks and spiritual objections. – Health Freedom Idaho
REFUSING VACCINES DUE TO THE TOXIC INGREDIENTS
Let’s examine the description (in part) of the MMR II, made by Merck & Co, Inc.
MMR II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) is a live virus vaccine for vaccination against measles (rubeola), mumps, and rubella (German measles). MMR II is a sterile lyophilized preparation of (1) ATTENUVAX (Measles Virus Vaccine Live), a more attenuated line of measles virus, derived from Enders’ attenuated Edmonston strain and propagated in chick embryo cell culture; (2) MUMPSVAX (Mumps Virus Vaccine Live), the Jeryl Lynn (B level) strain of mumps virus propagated in chick embryo cell culture; and (3) MERUVAX II (Rubella Virus Vaccine Live), the Wistar RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts. {1,2}
The growth medium for measles and mumps is Medium 199 (a buffered salt solution containing vitamins and amino acids and supplemented with fetal bovine serum) containing SPGA (sucrose, phosphate, glutamate, and recombinant human albumin) as stabilizer and neomycin…. Each dose of the vaccine is calculated to contain sorbitol, sodium phosphate, sucrose, sodium chloride, hydrolyzed gelatin, recombinant human albumin, fetal bovine serum, other buffer and media ingredients, and approximately 25mcg of neomycin….”
Certainly Ms. Dutton cannot fault loving parents for not wanting to inject those ingredients into their healthy children. There is not a single study proving the safety of injecting all those ingredients. Is Dutton unaware of this fact?
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS TO VACCINES TAINTED BY ABORTION
Many individuals believe vaccines are unclean and defile the temple (their body) because of the injection of modified viruses and bacteria, toxic contaminants and ingredients, and the fact they are cultured on aborted fetal tissues and animal tissues.
What do all these ingredients mean to someone with possible spiritual objections? There are at least two answers to this question. One is the issue of abortion. The other is the multiple biblical references to introducing foreign substances into the body.
Wistar RA 27/3 is listed and referenced with WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts. These are scientific terms and labels. Here is the reality of what they represent:
“The rubella virus clinically named RA273 (R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th fetus, 3=3rd tissue explant) was then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line. A later research paper by Stanley Plotkin [vaccine developer] would reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them.[13A] This means a total of over 80 separate, elective abortions recorded were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.” – Children of God for Life, Vaccines and Abortions.
For patients and parents with strong objections to abortion, this information could weigh heavily on the decision of whether or not to use products that contain aborted fetal tissue such as vaccination. (More information on aborted fetal tissue in vaccines)
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS TO VACCINES TAINTED WITH FOREIGN SUBSTANCES
The second potential religious or spiritual objection relates to foreign substances being introduced into the body. Many believe the Bible commands we not defile the temple God has created.
“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”
The bottom line is vaccines contain a variety of ingredients, both intended and unintended that may toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic and even fertility impairing – from aluminum to formaldehyde to polysorbate 80 to more. It is easy to understand how many parents might view these as a violation of God’s commandment.
DECLINING FOR HEALTH REASONS
To address the issues of underlying health problems and fear, let’s look at more information provided by the vaccine maker.
Hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine….
Do not give MMR II to pregnant females…
Anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to neomycin…
Febrile respiratory illness or other active febrile infection.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
Individuals with blood dyscrasias, leukemia, lymphomas of any type…
Primary and acquired immunodeficiency states…
Individuals with a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency….
PRECAUTIONS:
Adequate treatment provisions, including epinephrine injection (1:1000) should be available for immediate use should an anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction occur.
Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination.
As for any vaccine, vaccination with MMR II may not result in protection….
The health-care provider should provide the vaccine information required to be given with each vaccination to the patient, parent, or guardian.
The health-care provider should inform the patient, parent, or guardian of the benefits and risks associated with vaccination.
Manufacturers report that there are vaccine reactions that include getting measles from the vaccine…and chronic conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, brain swelling, paralysis (temporary or permanent), seizures, lazy eye and more…
The vaccine package insert contains a large section on adverse reactions, some of which include: Panniculitis, atypical measles, vasculitis, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions, arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, encephalitis, encephalopathy, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (adem), transverse myelitis, febrile convulsions, afebrile convulsions or seizures, ataxia, polyneuritis, polyneuropathy, ocular palsies, paresthesia.”
Given all this information, the description, the contraindications, and the precautions, doesn’t some fear seem warranted? And given these risks, does Dutton really think it is her place to declare the science settled, not to mention shame parents for well-placed fear?
REFUSING ADDITIONAL VACCINES AFTER SEEING A LOVED ONE INJURED
Ex-Vaxxer NOT Anti-Vaxxer
This category of people who decline vaccinations, those who were once pro-vaccine only to experience the downside first hand, is likely the largest. Despite the fact that less than one percent of vaccine adverse reactions are reported, there have been over 87,000 reports of adverse reactions to the MMR vaccine to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System from the US and it’s territories. And if only 1% of reactions are reported, there could be as many as 8,700,000 reactions.
Despite official reassurances that vaccine injuries are rare, parents who’ve seen their children hospitalized, stricken with chronic illnesses, paralysis, seizures, or blindness are not going to continue vaccinating. Siblings are spared the potential damage and parents are shamed for being anti-vax when they should receive our sympathy. In reality, they were pro-vaccine until they watched their child suffer and/or die. To add insult to injury, parents are shamed and targeted after vaccination injury by friends, family, and media. Many suffer in silence, raising a child with chronic illness or vaccine-induced physical challenge.
Yes, parents opt-out for religious and moral reasons as well as previous vaccine injuries. Others, faced with the decision of vaccination, having read the medical literature to truly understand the risks and being left with many unanswered questions as vaccines are not subject to the gold standard of double-blind, placebo-controlled rigor, they utilize the vaccine exemptions available through Idaho statute.
For example, parents seeking to find out how many children died in the last measles outbreak in 2019 are redirected to the CDC website. However, after scouring page after page there is NO INDICATION how many U.S. children died in the highly contagious measles outbreak. *It was ZERO for those still looking for the answer.*
Health officials, doctors, and mainstream media claim that 1 in 1000 children will die from measles but before the introduction of the measles vaccine, the reported number was 1 in 10,000. Thanks to public health measures such as sanitation and clean drinking water as well as access to healthcare and nutrition, the rate declined from 13.3 per 100,000 in 1900 to .2 per 100,000 in 1963, before the measles vaccine was introduced. No children have died from measles in the US in last 2 decades.
Some of the many unanswered questions:
Why aren’t vaccines tested according to the gold standard with double-blind placebos?
Why are they the only product that is one size fits all?
If vaccines are so safe, why is there zero manufacturer liability?
Why is the US the only country that gives the Hep B vaccine on the first day of life?
Why is it that after vaccine manufacturers received a liability-free pass, the vaccine schedule exploded to more than 70 doses of vaccines?
Why does the US give the chickenpox vaccine, when the UK and many other countries don’t, because it’s been proven to cause shingles, which is more dangerous?
Many scientists have raised the alarm on the amount of aluminum in vaccines. Why doesn’t the CDC address their concerns?
Why did the ACIP committee recently approve the new Hep B adjuvant despite the safety signal of a myocardial infarction?
Why are all four major vaccine makers (Merck, Sanofi, GSK and Pfizer), who have all been convicted of fraud, given a free pass when it comes to vaccines? Merck created the deadly drug Vioxx and is currently being sued for fraud relating to the Shingles vaccine, MMR vaccine, and Gardasil vaccine, their products are mandated for school entry?
Why do we give 26 vaccines in the first year of life to infants with immature immune systems that cannot even mount an immune response to vaccines?
Where are the safety studies on vaccines that were supposed to be conducted and submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure the vaccine’s safety?
While we are flattered that time and resources are being spent trying to figure out how a small grassroots effort could grow into an outspoken voice of freedom and liberty in Idaho – answer, because we speak the truth and it resonates – these above questions deserve a thorough examination. Is Dutton willing to ask them? What’s more, the only group possessing unfettered influence at the state and national level is the pharmaceutical industry, that is where the focus of investigative reporting should be. Dutton must possess a great deal of cognitive dissonance to believe that the same industry that has paid billions in fines for fraud and is the largest lobbyist and contributor to political campaigns in the nation, is trustworthy when it comes to vaccines even though they have no liability for these products.
Our question is whether an already opinionated journalist like Audrey Dutton is capable of reading the medical literature herself, talking to doctors and scientists with genuine concerns, investigating reported injuries and deaths after vaccines and writing a thought provoking and honest piece of journalism? Or will she simply regurgitate what conflicted officials, doctors, and vaccine stakeholders have fed her? We think educated readers know the answer to those questions.
Our question is whether an already opinionated journalist like Audrey Dutton is capable of reading the medical literature herself, talking to doctors and scientists with genuine concerns, investigating reported injuries and deaths after vaccines and writing a thought-provoking and honest journalism piece? Or will she simply regurgitate what conflicted officials, doctors, and vaccine stakeholders have fed her?
The CDC is removing listed excipients of vaccines from their official list that is made available to the public. Parents who have concerns about abortion tainted vaccines will find it harder to make an informed decision. The CDC recently removed and reworded the vaccine excipients list on their website.
Has Merck suddenly re-formulated their vaccine this past year after decades of using WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts (aka aborted fetal cells) for the development and manufacture of the MMR (measles vaccine)?
The CDC is trying to silently erase the evidence. It appears to be done as a marketing ploy removing controversial contents, removing words and changing around ingredients to make them seem less of a moral violation. This should be criminal.
Why don’t they want the public to know that this ingredient is used in the manufacturing process of the MMR vaccine? This appears to be an intentional ploy to confuse consumers.
Confusing consumers…
The CDC renamed the controversial ingredients from their printed list in January 2019. Human diploid is just a description of what the MRC-5 cell is. They are still harvested from healthy aborted human beings.
previous excipient list
Could it be, because they want to mandate vaccines and take away religious exemptions?
Are We Really Injecting Our Children with DNA of Aborted Human Beings?
The ‘grandfather’ of vaccines recently stated under oath that almost a hundred (or more) aborted human beings were used in the research and development of vaccines.
These preborn humans were healthy and their bodies used as spare parts. Portions of their DNA still remain in the vaccines injected into our children numerous times in their childhood.
Fetal DNA & TOXIC CONTAMINANTS are found in the final product of vaccines tested by independent labs
Corvelva.it The human fetal DNA presented in this vaccine is a single entire genome, which means the vaccine contains genomic DNA with all the chromosomes of a male individual (in fact MRC-5 originates from a male fetus).
Given below are the analysis results of different types of variants compared to the reference human genome.
16 students mistakenly given insulin instead of a tuberculosis test at McKenzie Center for Innovation and Technology on September 30, 2019.
9 a.m. Monday, Gaskin’s teacher took him and his classmates to the nurse’s office for medical testing. According to the notice, Gaskin was told soon after that he had been injected with insulin rather than given the TB test.
“He was instructed to not contact his parents, his blood sugar was not checked, he was not offered or provided any medical treatment, he was not assessed for any symptoms and no risks or warnings were explained to him,” the notice said.
Gaskin called his mother at approximately 11 a.m. and told her he was feeling ill. Smith arrived at McKenzie around 11:15 a.m. and found her son lying unconscious in a chair.
One of the many reasons we should not rely upon institutions, government and “experts” to solve our health issues. We need to take responsibility for our own health!
Health doesn’t come from a pill, a shot, or a supplement. We don’t get healthier by following guidelines from agencies, institutions, and corporations who have financial incentives and agendas.
We get healthier by connecting to the earth and our Creator, eating the foods we were designed to eat, and staying away from quick fixes that involve tainted science, fancy marketing, special interests, politics, and faulty reasoning.
Facebook Commenter
There is no replacement for knowledge and real food, and eliminating toxins and poisons from our environments and our lifestyles.
