Author: Health Freedom Idaho

  • Bill Gates-Funded Insect Company Set To Release GMO Moths In New York

    Bill Gates-Funded Insect Company Set To Release GMO Moths In New York

    In yet another demonstration of science tampering with nature, British company Oxitec plans to release genetically modified moths in New York.

    Oxitech has developed the GM moth to combat the highly chemical-resistant diamondback moth population that exclusively feeds on members of the cabbage family, which includes broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, and kale.

    The Bill Gates-funded insect company made headlines last year with the release of Zika-carrying, genetically modified mosquitoes, and, similar to that science experiment, the GM moths will attempt to wipe out the diamondback moth population by targeting fertility.

    Oxitec’s moths are exclusively male and have been modified to ensure that any breeding that occurs with a female diamondback will result in infertile offspring. “Our diamondback moth carries a self-limiting gene, that prevents female offspring from surviving to adulthood,” says Oxitec research lead Neil Morrison. “This allows us to release adult males only, which are harmless to the crop. When they mate with a pest female in the field, none of her female progeny would survive.”

    Oxitec claims their goal is to reduce the moth population without having to release any new pesticides into the environment…which is ironic as the diamondback moths are resistant to nearly 100 different varieties of pesticides and chemical compounds.

    The USDA has approved the release of the GM moths in an upstate New York cabbage patch. In a complete conflict of interest, Cornell University will oversee the release of the moths. Cornell University routinely receives money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which you can read about here, here, here, and here.

    Ten of thousands of genetically modified moths will soon be released by the Bill Gates-financed Oxitec corporation with the results being closely monitored by a university heavily funded by Bill Gates.

    Many groups have spoken out in opposition to the GM moths including the Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York (NOFANY). In a strongly disapproving letter, NOFA-NY expressed outrage over the questionable decision to release the genetically modified moths:

    “NOFA-NY firmly believes that it is the responsibility and legal obligation of both Cornell and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to perform a comprehensive environmental review and evaluate potential impacts prior to releasing this brand new organism on the world.

    Our concern from the beginning has not been to stifle cutting-edge science, whether or not we agree with it, but to advocate for transparency in the process and precaution in the advancement of new technologies to ensure the health and safety of people, all creatures, and the environment.

    We have outlined our specific concerns, and asked for comprehensive evaluation of potential impacts which we have also detailed to the federal and state governments as well as to Cornell University and Dr. Shelton.

    Yet, time and again, we have been served with pat answers that could have been used in any discussions of emerging technologies for the past decades. Comments such as “it is virtually no different than the non-GE version,” or “that health effect has already been studied for other insects.”

    Let’s be clear. This is the first world-wide release of the Genetically Engineered Diamondback Mothand the first use of ‘female lethality’ trait on a pest to a food crop in the world.”

    The complete letter written by NOFA-NY can be read by clicking here.

    The USDA has received more than 600 comments in regards to their decision. One commenter, Dana Marsh of Bloomington, Ind., wrote of her concern regarding the possibility of destroying the entire diamondback species. “As of today, we do not have complete understanding of how every insect and plant works,” Marsh wrote. “We still do not grasp the diversity that currently exists. The consequences of genetic engineering are untold and could prove fatal to our precious ecosystem. PLEASE leave nature alone.”

    Source: March Against Monsanto

  • Which diseases should you fear?

    Which diseases should you fear?

    What diseases do you FEAR your child might contract? Measles? Mumps? Leprosy? Wondering how many parents walk around daily concerned about their child contracting leprosy? It still exists- by the thousands in various parts of the world. The United States has roughly 200 new cases every year with over 6,500 cases of Hansen’s disease/Leprosy. Did you know that? I didn’t until I just looked it up. (See the source)

    Don’t you think it’s weird that there was hysteria over 31 measles cases (where no one died or was permanently harmed) and you hear exactly ZERO about 200 cases of leprosy and its long term health impact?

    Everyone knows when there is a measles or mumps outbreak. It’s all over the local news. Healthy (yet unvaccinated) children are denied school. Parents are pushed to get ‘updated’ on vaccines.

    How do we not hear about these cases of leprosy? Why aren’t you walking around concerned about leprosy every day? Why aren’t you concerned about someone from another country bringing leprosy into the US and somehow exposing all of our most vulnerable to this illness?

    I’ll tell you why…You are afraid of what we vaccinate for because these illnesses are hyped up all of the time. It’s propaganda. You are told what to fear, so they can then sell you their product for profit.

    Measles and others is a concern for you – because you are told that it should be. But you don’t walk around fearing leprosy. Your children haven’t contracted it either.

    Funny how that all works, isn’t it?

    The only diseases we fear are the ones that a vaccine has been developed and marketed for. We never feared measles and mumps in the early 20th century… Because the media didn’t tell us to.

    Yes, there are vaccines for bacterial and viral diseases. Of course they are working on vaccines for hundreds of diseases that we are not yet afraid of because we haven’t been to do to so.

    Did you know the newest vaccine requirement for Idaho is for a disease that affects 3 individuals in the state with a population of 1.6 million. A disease that is so exceedingly rare and already on a downward trend WITHOUT this extra vaccine requirement. It calls into question the motivation for the requirement.

    Perhaps its because Idaho Legislators are Sold Out to Big Pharma?

    Learn More about the Meningitis Mandate

  • Smart Meters Increasing EMF Exposure

    Smart Meters Increasing EMF Exposure

    KTVB’s Verify news reporter Tami Tremblay aired a report on Feb. 9th regarding EMF radiation (electromagnetic field) after HFI and Be EMF Safe hosted a documentary film about EMF radiation, “Generation Zapped”. It was inspiring and progressive to see KTVB willingness to take a look into this very important and highly debatable issue. The report was a fairly balanced assessment and did shed some light on the topic and pointed out that there are some possibly harmful effects of increasing amounts of manmade EMF radiation exposure. Besides using the Neutralizer and Smartdot for possible protection against EMF radiation, the report also offered several other ways for safer use of EMFs including: turning off the wi-fi when not in use, putting your cell phone in “airplane mode” when not using it and limiting the amount of time your family uses tablets when connected to wi-fi. We know they can’t fit everything in to a short segment so wanted to provide you with resources from Eric Brandt, of Be EMF Safe. This will provide you additional means of protections and resources to continue your research.

    HOW CAN YOU TELL THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE?

    The main way to determine what the EMFs are in an area, such as ones house or office, is to use EMF meters for measuring the four commonly known sources of EMF radiation. They are Electric, Magnetic, RF or Radio Frequency and Dirty Electricity. By using these meters a person can scientifically see, and sometimes hear, the EMF’s coming off of the device or in the area. Once one knows what the EMF levels are you can then work with how best to protect yourself by getting the right distance between the source and yourself or shielding yourself from it in some way. Or, you can stop using wifi based cell and cordless phones, Smart Meters and other wifi devices completely. An easy fix is switching over to using an ethernet cord for your computer internet service and utilizing wired landline phones.

    You can hire professional EMF safety technicians to do the EMF assessment and corrections for your home or office and/or you can get educated and buy the meters to do this process yourself.

    SMART METERS RF RADIATION

    One big source of RF radiation are the digital “Smart Meters” that have been installed and are replacing the older analog meters throughout the US and Canada. Many states the power companies demand that people accept the change to Smart Meters with little to no option to ‘opt out’. This is true for Idaho, Idaho Power says there are no options to OPT OUT of smart meters. In other states when there has been enough public outcry, power companies have reversed their decisions and allow customers to opt out of smart meters only if they pay additional fees/fines. (See Smart Meter Controversy Nevada)

    The Controversies

    Smart meters have blamed for health issues, fires, increased bills, and invasion of privacy. The main health concerns center around the high RF radiation ‘smart meters’ emit intermittently, which has been a source of suffering, to varying degrees, for some being closely exposed to their radiation. Not everyone is effected the same and many people don’t realize the connection between their unpleasant health symptoms and the quite possible source for that disease being due to the EMFs around them.

    Other key issues concerning these Smart Meters are that they have tended to catch on fire at times – one just did here in the valley that I just heard about. One never knows when that could happen and it’s safer to have the old analogue meters. See – Smart Meter Fires and Explosions

    Another issue is that the Smart Meters are quite invasive in their ability to track the use of every electronic device connected to that meter. The ‘’collecting” of this usage data can be and is being used by companies, without the consent of those who are being “gleaned”. A lot of people prefer to have some degree of privacy in their personal spaces.

    EMF RADIATION RESEARCH RESOURCES

    The American Academy of Environmental Medicine Calls for Immediate Caution regarding Smart Meter Installation.

    Smart Meter Website Links

    Here are links to websites on Smart meters that you will find informative and helpful in learning what you can do for yourself and in your community.

    To see links to websites with information on how to shield yourself from smart meters, seefurther below.

    Smart Meter Health Alert — Local Los Angeles initiative

    The People’s Initiative — Local Los Angeles initiative

    Burbank ACTION — Local Burbank and Glendale, California initiative

    Stop OC Smart Meters — Local Orange County (California) initiative
    To read and contribute your comment to a Yahoo chat group on this topic that one of the members of Stop OC Smart Meters has set up, clickhere.

    Stop Smart Meters Irvine — Local Irvine, California initiative

    Center for Electrosmog Prevention (CEP) — A nonprofit based in San Diego, California
    Smart Meter Dangers — A science-based website from the founders of the Center for Electrosmog Prevention (CEP)

    Smart Meter Help — A joint project of EMF Safety Network and Stop Smart Meters. Encourages you to submit your smart meter complaint online to create a nationwide database to be submitted to utility companies, regulators and government officials.

    Sage Reports — Cindy Sage’s website with her report on “Assessment of Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Emissions from Smart Meters.” Her firm, Sage Consulting, is based in Santa Barbara, California

    EMF Safety Network — Sandra Maurer’s initiative in Sebastopol (Northern), California

    Stop Smart Meters — Joshua Hart’s organization in Northern California
    Sample Letter to Utility — From Stop Smart Meters. Use to try to opt out before a smart meter is installed and to keep your analaog meter

    “Just Say No to Smart Meters” — Orlean Koehl’s initiative in Northern California

    Refuse Smart Meters — Based in Northern California

    Environmental Options Network EMF Blog — An excellent resource

    Center for Safer Wireless — Based in Virginia. The Center hosted the Wireless Safety Summit in October and will have audio and video of that conference available in December. Attendees met with their congressional delegations. As a result, “We have drafted a letter from Members of Congress to the US Surgeon General, Dr. Regina Benjamin, asking her to investigate and issue health advisories concerning the potential adverse health effects due to nonionizing electromagnetic radiation from wireless communications technologies.”

    SHIELDING YOUR FAMILY FROM EMF SMART METER RADIATION

    We can’t OPT OUT Of smart meters in Idaho, however you can shield yourself from your smart meter, at least to some extent.

    According to Oram Miller, it turns out that the diffusion pattern of the 900 MHz radio signal that communicates with neighboring smart meters on nearby houses as part of the neighborhood (mesh) area network (NAN)is 90% outwards from the smart meter and only 10% behind it back into the house. Furthermore, the metal backing of the large metal box that the electric meter is mounted upon affords good shielding and effectively blocks most frequencies from coming indoors straight through the wall.

    The net effect of a) having only a small portion of the major radio transmission aimed into the house, b) the natural reduction in field strength of any radio signal with distance, and, c) the shielding effect of metal, all results in more than a 90% reduction in the signal strength that I measure indoors compared with the readings at the same distance from the smart meter outdoors, without any additional shielding. The reading at 1-2 feet inside the wall indoors is generally 300 or so microWatts per meter squared. When I move six to eight feet further inside from the exterior wall, my radio frequency meter drops closer to less harmful exposure levels of 30-40 uW/m2 (we consider readings below 10 microWatts per meter squared to be safe for sleeping areas for all people except the most electrically-sensitive).

    If this is your bedroom, however, you don’t want microbursts of radio waves with a field strength of a few hundred microWatts per meter squared pulsing into your sleeping area day and night every ten to fifteen seconds.

    Options to reduce exposure: Until you can opt out of the smart meter program altogether, you want to either sleep in another room or add additional shielding in order to further reduce your exposure to these radio frequencies.

    1. This would include the use of any of the fabrics or non-toxic carbon-based paints sold by the retailers linked to below. These may be necessary, depending upon your level of sensitivity, even if you can opt out because radio frequencies can still enter your bedroom from smart meters on neighbors’ homes, particularly through the glass in windows.
    2. A more affordable, though less aesthetically pleasing alternative, at least temporarily, to shielding fabrics and paint is to use several layers of aluminum foil or several sheets of a thermal blanket sold for $4 at any sporting goods store. Place these on the inside of the wall that the smart meter is mounted upon. It is best to ground these with an alligator clip patch cord to the earth. The “gator to plug” patch cord is sold by Less EMF.
    3. The best way to shield a smart meter, however, that I have seen is to use a Smart Meter Guard, sold by an engineer in Northern California for $129. It is well worth the cost. Made with a fine mesh screen on the sides and front, it fits easily over your smart meter and is tightened down with a screwdriver. The mesh guard is grounded to the metal box that the smart meter is mounted upon, increasing its RF-shielding effectiveness.

    The manufacturer has a YouTube video on his website showing how much attenuation (weakening or lessening) of the RF signal strength this shield is actually capable of achieving, which is impressive. It drops from an average of 54,000 microWatts/meter squared (uW/m2) down to below 60 uW/m2

    More ideas for protecting your home and family

  • Lachlan Neylan: 22 month old severely brain damaged after a flu shot – Learn The Risk

    Lachlan Neylan: 22 month old severely brain damaged after a flu shot – Learn The Risk

    Lachlan Neylan was a happy, walking and talking 22-month-old boy…until in March 2012 he was given a flu shot that almost cost him his life. He was left unable to walk or talk and suffered severe brain damage, including seizures and swelling of the brain, known as encephalopathy, after he was accidentally given a flu shot banned for children under age five in Australia, where this story takes place.

    Lachlan began having seizures within hours of the shots. His parents were told he was unlikely to live, but he managed to pull through. But he will likely never walk or talk again.

    He just collapsed and started to have seizures. Doctors said they thought our son wouldn’t make it through the weekend. It was terrifying,” said Lachlan’s father.

    Before the injection, Lachlan had been a “walking, talking toddler.” After the flu shot, he stopped being able to sit, walk or talk and “he was back to being a three-month-old,” according to his parents.

    Fluvax (the shot given to Lachlan) had been banned for children under five in 2010 ­after it had been found to trigger febrile ­convulsions in one in every 100 children. Despite the ban the Department of Health confirmed the banned shot had been administered to 43 children under the age of five just that year. And the shot is regularly given to children older than five and adults.

    We don’t want anyone else to go through what we have been through,” said Mr Neylan after speaking out to media.

    The family’s home has now had to be turned into a ­rehabilitation centre for Lachlan, who is now faces a lifetime of disability. The family are yet to receive compensation for this injury that has completely changed their lives.

    Studies show that the flu shot rarely protects people from getting the flu and that increased vaccination does NOT reduce mortality in any age group. “We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group. Because fewer than 10% of all winter deaths were attributable to influenza in any season, we conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit.” (Study published in Archives of Internal Medicine)

    So is that flu shot really worth the REAL risk? Just to escape a few days of rest… Think twice before rolling up your sleeve. Actually think three times, four times, five times….

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.learntherisk.org/stories/lachlan-neylan-22-month-old-severely-brain-damaged-after-a-flu-shot/.
  • Heavy Metal Detox Smoothie

    Heavy Metal Detox Smoothie

    Juliana Benner of High Stream Healing Center has spent the last 30 years immersion in the health and wellness field. Today she shares with us at Detox Smoothie used in her daily routine.

    2 large (3 small) bananas
    1 cup Coconut milk or hemp milk
    2 -3 small oranges

    5 core ingredients Heavy Metal detox to pull metals

    2 Cups of Organic Frozen Blueberries
    1 to 2 teaspoons Hawaiian Spirulina
    2 teaspoon Dolce Seaweed Poweder (Maine Coast)
    1 to 2 teaspoons of Vimergy Barley Grass Powder
    Large Handful of Cilantro

    optional: ingredients to enhance flavor or for personal taste
    lettuce, spinach, kale, maka powder, Tablespoon of hemp hearts, tablespoon chia seeds,

    If you’d like to get the recommended Hawaiian Spirulina at 15% off, please register with my practitioner WELLEVATE account here: https://wellevate.me/juliana-benner

    A healthy, strong functioning colon is essential to maintaining good health. The colon, together with the kidneys, lungs, liver and skin are responsible for eliminating toxic waste from your body. Over time, your colon may lose its ability to properly eliminate waste from the gastrointestinal tract due to a combination of poor diet, improper food-combining, drug intake, stress and/or lifestyle.

    I finally have clarity on how to coach my clients on what to eat, as well as what NOT to eat, including which supplements may be supportive. As Hippocrates said, “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food”. AND, unless you’ve eaten real, whole food all of your life, colon hydrotherapy and the other detox modalities we offer here, such as Far Infra-red Sauna, have a HUGE part to play in getting the accumulated toxins moving out, freeing your body to do what it is always striving to do>>HEAL!

    Learn More @ http://www.boisecoloncleanse.com

    Nothing contained herein is meant to diagnose, treat or cure any disease.If you need medical attention, call a qualified healthcare professional.

  • Aluminum in Vaccines: Fetal Exposure

    Aluminum in Vaccines: Fetal Exposure

    Pregnant women are being told that they are being given vaccines to protect the baby in language that implies, if not outright states, that appropriate safety studies have been done. They have not. Pregnant women in the general population are in essence being used in ongoing clinical trials without their fully informed consent.

    Over the years, data has been gathered in a haphazard fashion using voluntary registries set up by pharmaceutical companies and in adverse event reports to VAERS, both of which suffer from extreme under-reporting. VSD (Vaccine Safety Datalink) studies on the safety of vaccination during pregnancy mostly include only pregnancies with live-birth outcomes, and very few studies look at the long-term health effects on children. One such rare study on vaccination with the influenza vaccine during pregnancy (Zerbo et al) found a significant association with autism. Even the most elaborate and inappropriate application of adjustments and corrections could not make the association go away in the first trimester, so the authors simply dismissed the result as due to chance. This is not science. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2617988

    The impact of maternal immune activation during pregnancy, and the impact of exposure to various vaccine components, such as the placenta-crossing 250 mcg of aluminum in the Tdap, on long-term neurological development are not known, but there’s enough science indicating that extreme caution is warranted. The current push to vaccinate during every single pregnancy, as well as during every outbreak, comes without any understanding of the health effect of such frequent administration of three disease antigens (tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) and other vaccine components. This is a small sampling of studies on one component, aluminum:

  • Flawed Science: Newborn Receives Same Dose of Neurotoxic Aluminum in Vaccines as 160 Pound Adult

    Flawed Science: Newborn Receives Same Dose of Neurotoxic Aluminum in Vaccines as 160 Pound Adult

    Regarding the aluminum in vaccines is the amount of aluminum allowed in a vaccine administered to a newborn based on safety studies? Is the dose based on the infant’s weight? On the amount of aluminum a newborn’s kidneys can safely eliminate? On the fragile state of the child’s developing immune and neurological systems? On the current science of aluminum particle neurotoxicity?

    No.

    March 2018 published paper reveals how the FDA determined the allowable amount of aluminum in a single vaccine–the same amount for a 7lb newborn as a 160lb adult–and reveals that it is absolutely critical for everyone who administers vaccines to children to cease following the CDC’s pediatric schedule and begin considering what is best for their young patients.

    The Highlights of this paper include:

    • Aluminum levels in vaccine is based on immune efficacy and ignore body weight for safety
    • Several critical mistakes have been made in the consideration of pediatric dosing of aluminum in vaccines
    • Safety inferences of vaccine doses of aluminum have relied solely on dietary exposure studies of adult mice and rats
    • On Day 1 of life, infants receive 17 time smore aluminum than would be allowed if the doses were adjusted per body weight
    • Revised MRL calculation based on weight sare provided, but are also based on derived speculation, NOT on safety data
      March 2018 Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology Volume 46, March 2018, Pages 76-82

    What is an adjuvant?

    From the CDC: “An adjuvant is an ingredient of a vaccine that helps create a stronger immune response in the patient’s body. In other words, adjuvants help vaccines work better. Some vaccines made from weakened or dead germs contain naturally occurring adjuvants and help the body produce a strong protective immune response. However, most vaccines developed today include just small components of germs, such as their proteins, rather than the entire virus or bacteria. These vaccines often must be made with adjuvants to ensure the body produces an immune response strong enough to protect the patient from the germ he or she is being vaccinated against.”

    From VaccinePapers.org:

    “The Dwoskins had attended the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and FDA meetings on vaccines, where aluminum was briefly discussed. Both the IOM and FDA acknowledged that aluminum adjuvant toxicity had not been studied. Inferences had been made, based on single-vaccine studies, but experiments to measure the toxicity of aluminum adjuvant had never been done (except by Shaw). In particular, nobody had ever tested the effect of the total amount of aluminum adjuvant received from the vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC.”

    For the results of aluminum-adjuvant injection experiments that replicated the CDC pediatric schedule, visit VaccinePapers.org. Key findings: Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes.

    An article about Aluminum Toxicity and History from Health Freedom Idaho’s toxicologist

    Dr. Suzanne Humphries breaks down the issue of aluminum into fine detail to help you better understand its use and effects.

    This video explains forms of aluminum adjuvants and inaccurate labeling.

    Here she explains the different forms of aluminum adjuvants and how mislabeling has played a role in obfuscating the common ingredient of several vaccines that continues to cause injuries.

    Aluminum Adjuvants

    Abstract: Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe? Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7.

    “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community.”

    Aluminum Toxicity Studies

    2002 “Neurological adverse events associated with vaccination.

    2002 “The potential role of aluminium in Alzheimer’s disease.”

    2004 “Chronic exposure to aluminum in drinking water increases inflammatory parameters selectively in the brain.

    2004 “Neurotoxic effects of aluminium among foundry workers and Alzheimer’s disease.)

    2007 “Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice.

    2007 “Neurological adverse events of immunization: experience with an aluminum adjuvanted meningococcal B outer membrane vesicle vaccine.

    2007 “Mechanisms of aluminum-induced neurodegeneration in animals: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease.

    2007 “Inflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, and environmental exposures.

    2008 “Role of metal ions in the abeta oligomerization in Alzheimer’s disease and in other neurological disorders.

    2009 “Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction.

    2009 “Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration.”

    2009 “Aluminum-induced defective mitochondrial metabolism perturbs cytoskeletal dynamics in human astrocytoma cells.

    2011 “Aluminum toxicity and astrocyte dysfunction: a metabolic link to neurological disorders.”

    2011 “Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?

    2011 “Metal ions affecting the neurological system.

    2013 “Autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA syndrome) in commercial sheep.

    2013 “How aluminum, an intracellular ROS generator promotes hepatic and neurological diseases: the metabolic tale.

    2014 “Aluminum-induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease.”

    2014 “Are there negative CNS impacts of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines and immunotherapy?

    2014 “A sudden onset of a pseudo-neurological syndrome after HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvated vaccine: might it be an autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) presenting as a somatoform disorder?

    2014 “Elevated brain aluminium and early onset Alzheimer’s disease in an individual occupationally exposed to aluminium: a case report.

    2014 “Prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminum leads to changes associated with brain aging and neurodegeneration.

    2014 “Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes.

    2014 “Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in aluminium neurotoxicity and its amelioration: a review

    “Being involved in the production of reactive oxygen species, aluminium may impair mitochondrial bioenergetics and may lead to the generation of oxidative stress. In this review, we have discussed the oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions occurring in Al neurotoxicity. In addition, the ameliorative measures undertaken in aluminium induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions have also been highlighted. ”

    2014 “Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.

    2014 “Aluminium Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Mediated Cell Death in SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cell Line Is Independent of p53”

    2015 “Trace elements in scalp hair samples from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

    2015 “Correlation of aluminum and manganese concentration in scalp hair samples of patients having neurological disorders.

    2015: “Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines

    “We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain. This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite for slow brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity.”

    2016: “Insight into the cellular fate and toxicity of aluminum adjuvants used in clinically approved human vaccinations

    “We demonstrate that not all aluminium adjuvants are equal neither in terms of their physical properties nor their biological reactivity and potential toxicities both at the injection site and beyond. High loading of aluminium oxyhydroxide in the cytoplasm of THP-1 cells without immediate cytotoxicity might predispose this form of aluminium adjuvant to its subsequent transport throughout the body including access to the brain.”

    2016 “Behavioral abnormalities in female mice following administration of aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil.”

    “Vaccine adjuvants and vaccines may induce autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations in susceptible individuals. To date most human vaccine trials utilize aluminum (Al) adjuvants as placebos despite much evidence showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures can be toxic to humans and animals. We sought to evaluate the effects of Al adjuvant and the HPV vaccine Gardasil versus the true placebo on behavioral and inflammatory parameters in female mice.”

    2016 “Aluminum adjuvants of vaccines injected into the muscle: Normal fate, pathology and associated disease.”

    “Although generally well tolerated on the short term, it has been suspected to occasionally cause delayed neurologic problems in susceptible individuals. In particular, the long-term persistence of aluminic granuloma also termed macrophagic myofasciitis is associated with chronic arthromyalgias and fatigue and cognitive dysfunction. Safety concerns largely depend on the long biopersistence time inherent to this adjuvant, which may be related to its quick withdrawal from the interstitial fluid by avid cellular uptake; and the capacity of adjuvant particles to migrate and slowly accumulate in lymphoid organs and the brain, a phenomenon documented in animal models and resulting from MCP1/CCL2-dependant translocation of adjuvant-loaded monocyte-lineage cells (Trojan horse phenomenon). These novel insights strongly suggest that serious re-evaluation of long-term aluminum adjuvant phamacokinetics and safety should be carried out.”

    2017 Effects of Aluminium on Rat Brain Mitochondria Bioenergetics: an In vitro and In vivo Study

    “The observed effects also included both an alteration in mitochondrial transmembrane potential and a decrease in oxidative phosphorylation capacity when relatively high concentrations of aluminium were added to the isolated mitochondria. These findings contribute to explain both the ability of aluminium to generate oxidative stress and its suggested potential to act as an etiological factor by promoting the progression of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease.”

    2017 The putative role of environmental aluminium in the development of chronic neuropathology in adults and children. How strong is the evidence and what could be the mechanisms involved?

    “Evidence of the neurotoxicity of aluminium cations (Al3+) includes: an association between chronic aluminium exposure and the development of AD; the involvement of aluminium adjuvants in the development of ASIA; and epidemiological evidence pointing to an association between the use of aluminium adjuvants and ASD.”

    “Aluminium has no known beneficial physiological action in the human body and some genetic polymorphisms predispose to a greater susceptibility to its adverse effects. Therefore, a strong case can be made for avoiding unnecessary exposure to environmental sources of aluminium salts, especially on the part of children, pregnant mothers and women of child-bearing age who may become pregnant. Such avoidance need not lead to hardship or inconvenience; aluminium cookware may be replaced by safer alternatives, while aluminium-containing antiperspirants, potentially implicated in the rise of cases of breast cancer particularly affecting the upper outer quadrant of the mammary gland, may be replaced by non-aluminium versions. The use of aluminium salts in medical products is a more contentious issue. While antacids are available which do not contain aluminium salts, the avoidance of immunisations which do not contain aluminium salts as adjuvants has wider political and financial implications. It would seem prudent to try to find an alternative to aluminium adjuvants as soon as possible and phase out their use.”

    “Moreover, aluminium exposure is associated with the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and with the development of chronic oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and glial activation or dysfunction; these changes in turn are associated with ASD.”

    2017 Aluminium in brain tissue in autism.

    “The pre-eminence of intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in autism spectrum disorder.”

    We thank Informaed Choice Washington for the detailed research and sharing this critical information: http://informedchoicewa.com/.

  • Flawed Science: Newborn Receives Same Dose of Neurotoxic Aluminum in Vaccines as 160 Pound Adult

    Flawed Science: Newborn Receives Same Dose of Neurotoxic Aluminum in Vaccines as 160 Pound Adult

    Regarding the aluminum in vaccines is the amount of aluminum allowed in a vaccine administered to a newborn based on safety studies? Is the dose based on the infant’s weight? On the amount of aluminum a newborn’s kidneys can safely eliminate? On the fragile state of the child’s developing immune and neurological systems? On the current science of aluminum particle neurotoxicity?

    No.

    March 2018 published paper reveals how the FDA determined the allowable amount of aluminum in a single vaccine–the same amount for a 7lb newborn as a 160lb adult–and reveals that it is absolutely critical for everyone who administers vaccines to children to cease following the CDC’s pediatric schedule and begin considering what is best for their young patients.

    The Highlights of this paper include:

    • Aluminum levels in vaccine is based on immune efficacy and ignore body weight for safety
    • Several critical mistakes have been made in the consideration of pediatric dosing of aluminum in vaccines
    • Safety inferences of vaccine doses of aluminum have relied solely on dietary exposure studies of adult mice and rats
    • On Day 1 of life, infants receive 17 time smore aluminum than would be allowed if the doses were adjusted per body weight
    • Revised MRL calculation based on weight sare provided, but are also based on derived speculation, NOT on safety data
      March 2018 Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology Volume 46, March 2018, Pages 76-82

    What is an adjuvant?

    From the CDC: “An adjuvant is an ingredient of a vaccine that helps create a stronger immune response in the patient’s body. In other words, adjuvants help vaccines work better. Some vaccines made from weakened or dead germs contain naturally occurring adjuvants and help the body produce a strong protective immune response. However, most vaccines developed today include just small components of germs, such as their proteins, rather than the entire virus or bacteria. These vaccines often must be made with adjuvants to ensure the body produces an immune response strong enough to protect the patient from the germ he or she is being vaccinated against.”

    From VaccinePapers.org:

    “The Dwoskins had attended the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and FDA meetings on vaccines, where aluminum was briefly discussed. Both the IOM and FDA acknowledged that aluminum adjuvant toxicity had not been studied. Inferences had been made, based on single-vaccine studies, but experiments to measure the toxicity of aluminum adjuvant had never been done (except by Shaw). In particular, nobody had ever tested the effect of the total amount of aluminum adjuvant received from the vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC.”

    For the results of aluminum-adjuvant injection experiments that replicated the CDC pediatric schedule, visit VaccinePapers.org. Key findings: Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes.

    An article about Aluminum Toxicity and History from Health Freedom Idaho’s toxicologist

    Dr. Suzanne Humphries breaks down the issue of aluminum into fine detail to help you better understand its use and effects.

    This video explains forms of aluminum adjuvants and inaccurate labeling.

    Here she explains the different forms of aluminum adjuvants and how mislabeling has played a role in obfuscating the common ingredient of several vaccines that continues to cause injuries.

    Aluminum Adjuvants

    Abstract: Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe? Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7.

    “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community.”

    Aluminum Toxicity Studies

    2002 “Neurological adverse events associated with vaccination.

    2002 “The potential role of aluminium in Alzheimer’s disease.”

    2004 “Chronic exposure to aluminum in drinking water increases inflammatory parameters selectively in the brain.

    2004 “Neurotoxic effects of aluminium among foundry workers and Alzheimer’s disease.)

    2007 “Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice.

    2007 “Neurological adverse events of immunization: experience with an aluminum adjuvanted meningococcal B outer membrane vesicle vaccine.

    2007 “Mechanisms of aluminum-induced neurodegeneration in animals: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease.

    2007 “Inflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, and environmental exposures.

    2008 “Role of metal ions in the abeta oligomerization in Alzheimer’s disease and in other neurological disorders.

    2009 “Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction.

    2009 “Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration.”

    2009 “Aluminum-induced defective mitochondrial metabolism perturbs cytoskeletal dynamics in human astrocytoma cells.

    2011 “Aluminum toxicity and astrocyte dysfunction: a metabolic link to neurological disorders.”

    2011 “Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?

    2011 “Metal ions affecting the neurological system.

    2013 “Autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA syndrome) in commercial sheep.

    2013 “How aluminum, an intracellular ROS generator promotes hepatic and neurological diseases: the metabolic tale.

    2014 “Aluminum-induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease.”

    2014 “Are there negative CNS impacts of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines and immunotherapy?

    2014 “A sudden onset of a pseudo-neurological syndrome after HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvated vaccine: might it be an autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) presenting as a somatoform disorder?

    2014 “Elevated brain aluminium and early onset Alzheimer’s disease in an individual occupationally exposed to aluminium: a case report.

    2014 “Prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminum leads to changes associated with brain aging and neurodegeneration.

    2014 “Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes.

    2014 “Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in aluminium neurotoxicity and its amelioration: a review

    “Being involved in the production of reactive oxygen species, aluminium may impair mitochondrial bioenergetics and may lead to the generation of oxidative stress. In this review, we have discussed the oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions occurring in Al neurotoxicity. In addition, the ameliorative measures undertaken in aluminium induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions have also been highlighted. ”

    2014 “Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.

    2014 “Aluminium Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Mediated Cell Death in SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cell Line Is Independent of p53”

    2015 “Trace elements in scalp hair samples from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

    2015 “Correlation of aluminum and manganese concentration in scalp hair samples of patients having neurological disorders.

    2015: “Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines

    “We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain. This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite for slow brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity.”

    2016: “Insight into the cellular fate and toxicity of aluminum adjuvants used in clinically approved human vaccinations

    “We demonstrate that not all aluminium adjuvants are equal neither in terms of their physical properties nor their biological reactivity and potential toxicities both at the injection site and beyond. High loading of aluminium oxyhydroxide in the cytoplasm of THP-1 cells without immediate cytotoxicity might predispose this form of aluminium adjuvant to its subsequent transport throughout the body including access to the brain.”

    2016 “Behavioral abnormalities in female mice following administration of aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil.”

    “Vaccine adjuvants and vaccines may induce autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations in susceptible individuals. To date most human vaccine trials utilize aluminum (Al) adjuvants as placebos despite much evidence showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures can be toxic to humans and animals. We sought to evaluate the effects of Al adjuvant and the HPV vaccine Gardasil versus the true placebo on behavioral and inflammatory parameters in female mice.”

    2016 “Aluminum adjuvants of vaccines injected into the muscle: Normal fate, pathology and associated disease.”

    “Although generally well tolerated on the short term, it has been suspected to occasionally cause delayed neurologic problems in susceptible individuals. In particular, the long-term persistence of aluminic granuloma also termed macrophagic myofasciitis is associated with chronic arthromyalgias and fatigue and cognitive dysfunction. Safety concerns largely depend on the long biopersistence time inherent to this adjuvant, which may be related to its quick withdrawal from the interstitial fluid by avid cellular uptake; and the capacity of adjuvant particles to migrate and slowly accumulate in lymphoid organs and the brain, a phenomenon documented in animal models and resulting from MCP1/CCL2-dependant translocation of adjuvant-loaded monocyte-lineage cells (Trojan horse phenomenon). These novel insights strongly suggest that serious re-evaluation of long-term aluminum adjuvant phamacokinetics and safety should be carried out.”

    2017 Effects of Aluminium on Rat Brain Mitochondria Bioenergetics: an In vitro and In vivo Study

    “The observed effects also included both an alteration in mitochondrial transmembrane potential and a decrease in oxidative phosphorylation capacity when relatively high concentrations of aluminium were added to the isolated mitochondria. These findings contribute to explain both the ability of aluminium to generate oxidative stress and its suggested potential to act as an etiological factor by promoting the progression of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease.”

    2017 The putative role of environmental aluminium in the development of chronic neuropathology in adults and children. How strong is the evidence and what could be the mechanisms involved?

    “Evidence of the neurotoxicity of aluminium cations (Al3+) includes: an association between chronic aluminium exposure and the development of AD; the involvement of aluminium adjuvants in the development of ASIA; and epidemiological evidence pointing to an association between the use of aluminium adjuvants and ASD.”

    “Aluminium has no known beneficial physiological action in the human body and some genetic polymorphisms predispose to a greater susceptibility to its adverse effects. Therefore, a strong case can be made for avoiding unnecessary exposure to environmental sources of aluminium salts, especially on the part of children, pregnant mothers and women of child-bearing age who may become pregnant. Such avoidance need not lead to hardship or inconvenience; aluminium cookware may be replaced by safer alternatives, while aluminium-containing antiperspirants, potentially implicated in the rise of cases of breast cancer particularly affecting the upper outer quadrant of the mammary gland, may be replaced by non-aluminium versions. The use of aluminium salts in medical products is a more contentious issue. While antacids are available which do not contain aluminium salts, the avoidance of immunisations which do not contain aluminium salts as adjuvants has wider political and financial implications. It would seem prudent to try to find an alternative to aluminium adjuvants as soon as possible and phase out their use.”

    “Moreover, aluminium exposure is associated with the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and with the development of chronic oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and glial activation or dysfunction; these changes in turn are associated with ASD.”

    2017 Aluminium in brain tissue in autism.

    “The pre-eminence of intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in autism spectrum disorder.”

    We thank Informaed Choice Washington for the detailed research and sharing this critical information: http://informedchoicewa.com/.

  • NON-GMO Label and the Power of Your Purchase $$

    NON-GMO Label and the Power of Your Purchase $$

    NON GMO label has Idaho beet farmers reconsidering their GMO crops. This just goes to show the power of our purchases.

    “We have lost 15 percent of our customers who used to buy beet sugar and cane sugar interchangeably based on price, quality and delivery service. They will now not buy beet sugar regardless of the price because they want to be able to label their food products non-GMO.”

    Many Idaho farmers use a genetically modified seed that is resistant to certain herbicides, engineered by companies like Monsanto. Sugar beets account for 1.7 percent of Idaho’s gross total product and Amalgamated Sugar processes about 7 million tons of sugar beets a year, producing 12 percent of the sugar made in the United States, McCreedy said.

    Conventional food producers say their products are safe, but the dangers of Round Up and other chemicals in food production are well known. The disease-stricken United States population has realized that conventional foods and dietary guidelines failed them. However, the word is out that organic foods make people feel healthier.

    Many people in Idaho opposed to GMOs with legitimate concerns about the increase usage of herbicides and pesticides on the crops and their contamination of our ground water.

    The issue isn’t just about whether it affects human health if you eat it. It is the entire corrupt business ecosystem around it, and the impact to the biological ecosystem around GMO fields.

    A Pew Research Center survey found nearly 40 percent of adults believe non-GMO food is safer. There are now 36,000 products carrying a non-GMO label, McCreedy said.

    Amalgamated Sugar plans to launch a national campaign about the science behind GMOs, but it is having a hard time convincing other agricultural companies to join its cause. It’s working with a Washington, D.C. firm on a $30 million-a-year media campaign and has reached out to trade associations representing other highly genetically engineered crops such as corn to raise money, but has only raised $16 million.

    Instead of creating a marketing campaign perhaps they should LISTEN TO THE CONSUMERS!

    https://idahobusinessreview.com/…/idaho-sugar-industry-pla…/

  • NON-GMO Label and the Power of Your Purchase $$

    NON-GMO Label and the Power of Your Purchase $$

    NON GMO label has Idaho beet farmers reconsidering their GMO crops. This just goes to show the power of our purchases.

    “We have lost 15 percent of our customers who used to buy beet sugar and cane sugar interchangeably based on price, quality and delivery service. They will now not buy beet sugar regardless of the price because they want to be able to label their food products non-GMO.”

    Many Idaho farmers use a genetically modified seed that is resistant to certain herbicides, engineered by companies like Monsanto. Sugar beets account for 1.7 percent of Idaho’s gross total product and Amalgamated Sugar processes about 7 million tons of sugar beets a year, producing 12 percent of the sugar made in the United States, McCreedy said.

    Conventional food producers say their products are safe, but the dangers of Round Up and other chemicals in food production are well known. The disease-stricken United States population has realized that conventional foods and dietary guidelines failed them. However, the word is out that organic foods make people feel healthier.

    Many people in Idaho opposed to GMOs with legitimate concerns about the increase usage of herbicides and pesticides on the crops and their contamination of our ground water.

    The issue isn’t just about whether it affects human health if you eat it. It is the entire corrupt business ecosystem around it, and the impact to the biological ecosystem around GMO fields.

    A Pew Research Center survey found nearly 40 percent of adults believe non-GMO food is safer. There are now 36,000 products carrying a non-GMO label, McCreedy said.

    Amalgamated Sugar plans to launch a national campaign about the science behind GMOs, but it is having a hard time convincing other agricultural companies to join its cause. It’s working with a Washington, D.C. firm on a $30 million-a-year media campaign and has reached out to trade associations representing other highly genetically engineered crops such as corn to raise money, but has only raised $16 million.

    Instead of creating a marketing campaign perhaps they should LISTEN TO THE CONSUMERS!

    https://idahobusinessreview.com/…/idaho-sugar-industry-pla…/