Idaho! Do you want to know why we did NOT need the federalism committee, and why we don’t need bills to protect us from Biden’s unconstitutional mandate?
Several reasons!! _______________________________________________
The 9th and 10th amendments of the US Constitution.
The Idaho Constitution
Idaho Code 39-9002 and our state’s public policy statement in 39-9003.
The above-referenced laws and sections of code are set up perfectly for our state to simply say NO. ____________________________________________________
WANT TO KNOW WHAT IDAHO *DOES* NEED??
A GOVERNOR AND AG WITH THE COURAGE, WILLINGNESS, AND HEART TO STAND ON IDAHO SOVEREIGNTY, AND LEGISLATORS WILLING TO TELL IACI TO GO AWAY!!!!!! ___________________________________________________
TITLE 39 CHAPTER 90
IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT
39-9003. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY. (1) The power to require or regulate a person’s choice in the mode of securing health care services, or to impose a penalty related thereto, is not found in the Constitution of the United States of America, and is, therefore, a power reserved to the people pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, and to the several states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The state of Idaho hereby exercises its sovereign power to declare the public policy of the state of Idaho regarding the right of all persons residing in the state of Idaho in choosing the mode of securing health care services free from the imposition of penalties, or the threat thereof, by the federal government of the United States of America relating thereto.
(2) It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America.
Monday, November 15th the Idaho Legislature will be back at the Capitol. Make plans NOW to attend. Health Freedom Idaho and other liberty-minded organizations will bet there bright and early as the Committee Hearing starts at 7:30 a.m.
There are many things on the agenda!!
HOUSE VOTE ON CENSURE OF REP GIDDINGS
There will be a vote regarding Rep. Priscilla Giddings (R-White Bird), a candidate for Lieutenant Governor, from the House Ethics Committee based on several complaints submitted to the committee.
One complaint was submitted by Rep. Greg Chaney (R-Caldwell) – that was later dropped, and the other was submitted by several dozen legislators, Republicans, and Democrats.
The complaints stem from April of this year when Giddings shared a news article from Redoubt News. The article contained the name, image, and other personal information about the woman who is currently accusing Von Ehlinger of rape. When the article was released, there was no active investigation by the Boise Police Department, but the House Ethics Committee had chosen to move forward on an ethics hearing and submitted to the House Floor recommendations of censure.
HEARINGS ON 30 BILLS REGARDING VACCINE AND MASK MANDATES
Many state elected officials and candidates are weighing in on whether it’s the government’s role to protect the business owner’s right to refuse service or protect the individual’s right to medical privacy and bodily autonomy. Many patriots have made the accurate point that government does not have the right to interfere with private businesses and we agree.
So, let’s define private business.
Are you a private business owner if you have partnered with the state or federal government through licensure or are overseen by a board of directors created by state law? Are you a private business if you have received loans or grants from the state or federal governments? We agree that a truly private business has the right to decide who to do business with but we will be hard-pressed to find these businesses today. Unfortunately, we have businesses that are partnering with or have placed themselves under the jurisdiction of government entities and agencies. We have business owners giving over their sovereignty in trade for government oversight and funds. Given the fact that many businesses have government strings attached, we have to ask if the government can force trade without discrimination.
Who created government? Who created private businesses? The sovereign individual did.
Individual rights come first and the ultimate purpose of government is to protect individual rights first and foremost. Yes, that includes stopping the violation of those rights from ANY party.
Representative Chad Christiansen
What the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry (IACI) fails to recognize in their official statement (see below) is that, as the creator of both government and private business, it is the individual whose rights must be protected above all others. This is a key point missed by IACI’s President, Alex LaBeau, in his statement regarding next week’s legislative session.
If passed during Idaho’s 2020 legislative session Health Freedom Idaho’s bill H140, carried by Rep Priscilla Giddings, would have stopped our tax money from being used to coerce vaccination of employees by employers. It is due to Sen Patrick putting the people’s bill in the drawer and not allowing his committee to hear or vote on it that we find many Idaho workers facing the difficult decision of deciding between subjecting themselves to be a medical experiment or providing food and shelter for their families. Our tax money should never be used to expose private medical information nor coerce medical treatments or experiments upon a sovereign individual (the creator of said government).
With representatives coming back into session on Nov 15, 2021, we must be prepared to defend Idahoan’s sovereignty from an overreaching federal government. Governor Little, former chairman of IACI and board member for 20 years, announced that he will sue the Biden administration.
This is not enough!
For all, we know this is a smoke and mirrors tactic to give the illusion of “pro-freedom” for the upcoming elections for which he hasn’t announced yet but has raised more money than the official candidates.
We need the people’s representatives, our legislators, to take protective action now for bodily autonomy. We encourage you not to settle for the crumbs that will be presented as freedom bills during this upcoming session. We have a NO COMPROMISE position on the individual owning their own bodies and as creators of government, we demand it be respected. If you give an inch on this most fundamental principle you will find that you have lost everything because if you don’t own your body then you are a slave.
In conclusion, if the private business agrees to government interference through money and licensure then the private business MUST agree to respect the person as sovereign.
P.S. Health Freedom Idaho will prepare you for testimony and emails with information and calls to action (CTA). We have information regarding HIPAA and the much-talked-about Supreme Court decision on the Jacobson case coming out soon. We are not friends with the likes of Zuckerberg or Dorsey so they work hard to make sure you don’t see our info on social media.
IACI has supported the lockdown of our society from the beginning of this race for federal dollars. They are more than willing to take the handouts, to see private small businesses out of business. We don’t need these so-called Legislative advisors, (lobbyists) telling Idahoans how to live.
This letter from the most powerful lobby organization in the state will guide many of the decisions made during the upcoming legislative session. They contribute and spend hundreds of thousands on campaigns in this state. Government bureaucratic agencies, who are the arm of the governor’s office shut down small businesses, continue to tell them how to operate. You must beg permission through continual licensing to run your business, meeting all of the rules bureaucratic agencies make, thousands and thousands of pages.
Our churches were shut down per the Governor of this state. No small business, was immune from the heavy hand of interference by the executive branch, who is managed by this lobbying group. You have no freedom to conduct business, and as an autonomous human being, you have no freedom to choose what is shot into your body, because of the direct threat of losing your ability to pursue your happiness and FEED YOUR FAMILY.
Concerning the 1,800 pages out of tens of thousands of pages of regulations, can anyone please share how their life changed after the removal of a few words here and there and some sentences? HOW HAS YOUR LIFE CHANGED FOR THE BETTER?
SHAME on IACI for working to shame those who are willing to stand for the people. IACI had no problem lurking in the halls of the capital to hatch immunity for their businesses interests, during the 2020 special session.
via Senator Christy Zito via Facebook Post November 10, 2021
“I was the father of a 16-year-old son. A single parent. I raised my boy since he was a baby. He meant the world to me. We were always together. He was my best friend. We got the Pfizer Vaccine because I thought it would protect him. I thought it was the right thing to do. My government lied to me. They said it was safe, and now . . . I go home to an empty house. He was my baby boy. They need to stop pushing this on our children. I lost mine. You need to protect yours. I love the hell out of my country, but I don’t trust my government anymore.” — Ernest Ramirez Want to know more about vaccine reactions? On social media platforms type in this hashtag: #ProtectYourChildren #WeDid
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Oct. 15 it was delaying a decision on authorizing Moderna’s COVID vaccine for adolescents while the agency assesses whether the shot could increase the risk of myocarditis, a heart inflammatory condition, the Wall Street Journal reported.
In June, the FDA added a warning to the literature accompanying Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID vaccines, to indicate an increased risk of myocarditis.
However in May, a few weeks before the FDA added the warning, the agency authorized Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for ages 12 to 17, despite the known increased risk of myocarditis.
It was also in June that Moderna filed for authorization in the U.S. of its vaccine for adolescents 12 through 17 years old.
Pfizer adds an ingredient used to stabilize heart attack victims in vax for kids. Buried on Page 14 in the Pfizer paperwork with the FDA for the Covid vaccine for children is disturbing.
Nov 02, 2021 · The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday approvedPfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5 to 11 years.
Why would the FDA allow a vaccine with such high risk? It could be the manufacturer is influencing those individuals responsible for the approval with a portion of their $36 billion in profit for the liability-free vaccine. – concerned citizen
Here is a visual of the reported adverse events to the COVID vaccines that have been available since February 2021. Notice the number of children suffering from heart attacks and heart conditions.
Reports represent less than 10% of actual adverse events. Many doctors and hospitals refuse to report. Many families suffering from injury don’t know nor have the time to submit a report as they are struggling with the impact of severe health conditions that result from the vaccination. These shots are liability-free for the administrators and manufacturers. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/covid-19-vaccine-is-liability-free-for-everyone-but-you/
“There are several children/teens in the Boise area that have suffered as a direct result of the vaccine. Educate before you vaccinate. Research for yourself what the risk of the disease is to your child. Is it worth risking an experimental medical product that has NO long-term studies? “ – mom concerned about vaccine risks
The Federal Court Blocks Biden Administration’s Private Business COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate. With multiple lawsuits against the OSHA regulation filed in several circuit courts, federal rules for mulit-circuit litigation call for the cases to be consolidated and heard by one court that’s initially chosen by a lottery.
A federal appeals court in New Orleans suspended the Biden administration’s emergency temporary rule requiring employers to mandate Covid-19 vaccination or regular testing.
Citing “grave statutory and constitutional issues,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit put the newly minted workplace mandate rule on hold Saturday pending further litigation.
The order comes a day after the Occupational Safety and Health Administration officially published its vaccinate-or-test regulation, which was met by a flurry of lawsuits from Republican state attorneys general, companies, and other organizations seeking to block it. The emergency temporary standard is supposed to last just six months, heightening the significance of any delay before the rule gets full judicial review.
The three-judge Fifth Circuit panel that halted the regulation is composed of Judges Kyle Duncan and Kurt Engelhardt, who were both appointed by the Trump administration, and Judge Edith Jones, a Reagan administration appointee.
Health Freedom Idaho is hosting a formal Christmas Gala to benefit Toys for Tots this December 3, 2021 at 7 pm in Meridian.
Join us as we gather together at the Backstage Bistro Village Cinema Meridian for an evening of food, music, and fellowship. Admission is $40 plus a new unwrapped toy.
Idaho Parents – Do you realize that your minor child 14 to 17 is able to consent to their own treatment for contagious and infectious disease?? COVID, measles, chickenpox – well, all those childhood vaccines, are part of the medical ‘treatment’ for infectious diseases.
Does this mean that your 14 year old could receive a vaccination at a school clinic without your authority or permission? READ THE LAW BELOW.
Think that it doesn’t affect your family, or there will be no chance of it happening?
West Ada School District is hiring more nurses. Opening medical clinics on school and district properties.
These predators know that 39-3801 Idaho Code exists. HFI and Rep Priscilla Giddings brought this to the attention of Chairman Fred Woods during the 2021 Regular Legislative Session that this section of code needed to be repealed to preserve parental authority. Fred Wood refused a print hearing.
Consider this scenario of the infectious disease that has put us in a state of emergency COVID-19:
Imagine you are 14 and a freshman in high school. You are on “the list” because your parents have a vax exemption on file for you or some other reason the school knows you haven’t been injected yet with experimental mRNA gene therapy (aka medical treatment). Your 14-year-old friends have all had it. They are heckling you. You feel like the freak. The nurse calls you to the office and says, “Look right here, Idaho law says you are mature enough to make this decision on your own.” How many of us at 14 could have pushed back and said no??
MINORS — CONSENT TO TREATMENT39-3801. INFECTIOUS, CONTAGIOUS, OR COMMUNICABLE DISEASE — MEDICAL TREATMENT OF MINOR 14 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER — CONSENT OF PARENTS OR GUARDIAN UNNECESSARY. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a minor fourteen (14) years of age or older who may have come into contact with any infectious, contagious, or communicable disease may give consent to the furnishing of hospital, medical and surgical care related to the diagnosis or treatment of such disease, if the disease or condition is one which is required by law, or regulation adopted pursuant to law, to be reported to the local health officer. Such consent shall not be subject to disaffirmance because of a minority. The consent of the parent, parents, or legal guardian of such minor shall not be necessary to authorize hospital, medical and surgical care related to such disease, and such parent, parents, or legal guardian shall not be liable for payment for any care rendered pursuant to this section.History:[39-3801, added 1971, ch. 107, sec. 1, p. 227.]
Someone decided to do a poor write-up on Health Freedom Idaho on Wikipedia. Of course, it’s skewed, inaccurate, and bias. So, we made an attempt to update the listing with accurate information and citations. The update remained on the site for eleven minutes until it was reverted to inaccuracy. They don’t want the truth – just propoganda.
Remember your sources. Wikipedia promotes only what they want to promote. Having primary sources from the organization they are trying to describe would be too close to the truth for their comfort. The 3 hours of work it took to do this write-up with citation was reverted. The second attempt was made and it was just a matter of seconds to revert it’s inaccuracies.
Health Freedom Idaho is a grassroots health freedom organization dedicated to preserving the freedom of choice for health care decisions of all individuals, preserving parental rights, defending natural rights, and protecting citizens’ access to toxin-free living in the great state of Idaho. [1] They believe that mandates for medical procedures have no place in a free society supporting individuals’ freedom to make medical choices for their families with informed consent. Concerns about mask requirements[2], restrictions on the operation of businesses due to the COVID-19 pandemic[3], and vaccine mandates for employment[4] and other COVID pandemic reactions have the organization leaders, volunteers and members attending and speaking out at events across the state. Founded in May 2015, the organization describes its mission as including “preserv[ing] our freedoms regarding the health care of our choice.” While the group’s activities have mainly taken place in the Boise area, the organization has a northern chapter hosting several educational events in 2020-2021.[5]
Leadership
As of 2021, the organization has a long-standing executive board and was headed by co-executive directors Miste Gardner Karlfeldt and Sarah Clendenon.
Parental Rights
Health Freedom Idaho has worked to preserve the rights of parents in areas of vaccination, medical choice, and parental authority for medical treatment of minor children. Of significant concern is the intrusion of CPS on families and the traumatizing impact that results. Health Freedom Idaho brought to light numerous attempts of medical kidnap in North Idaho, initiated by hospital staff, after parents requested a second opinion or ask questions regarding an invasive treatment.[6][7][8] More than 80% of children removed from their homes in Idaho are returned to parents. Many families suffer trauma from separation and even abuse within the child protective system.[9]
Faith Healing
Health Freedom Idaho has opposed the changing of Idaho state laws regarding children and faith healing.[10] On October 3, 2016, several Health Freedom Idaho members attended a meeting of the Children at Risk of Faith Healing working group to provide testimony against changing the laws under discussion. The working group included state legislators and was formed at the request of then-governor Butch Otter to examine laws that exempt parents from the requirement to seek emergency medical care for a child in the case of a health emergency if they instead attempt to use faith healing. In the five years prior to the hearing, there were less than 3 cases of children dying per year in such circumstances with several of these deaths including newborns with unattended home births.[11] The working group ultimately opted not to submit a recommendation to the Idaho Legislature on whether or not to change the laws.[6]
Health Freedom Idaho has taken a strong stance for parental rights [12][13] opposing additional statutes citing the current statutes already place to protect children from abuse and neglect. HFI brought awareness to the legislators that the small political organization promoting legal change had the backing of a vaccine advocate, Paul Offit, who said numerous times that parents should lose their children if they don’t vaccinate.[14] There were serious concerns that the ‘faith healing campaign’ had a more sinister motive designed to undermine parental authority rather than protect children in Idaho.[15][16]
Vaccination views
The organization holds the view that every parent should have the authority to choose what is for their family in regards to medical treatment, including vaccination. Health Freedom Idaho is frequently described in the media as an anti-vaccination group by the media. Promoting informed consent, the organization has hundreds of articles about the liability-free status of vaccine manufacturers[17], about the risks of vaccines[18] [19] [20], and the moral concerns about abortion-tainted vaccines.[21][22][23] Health Freedom Idaho is additament about providing parents with the information to make vaccination choices for their own family, “education before vaccination.” hosted annual events to allow parents to hear from immunologists and doctors about the risk versus benefits of childhood vaccinations and the newly developed COVID vaccines. [24]
Health Freedom Idaho opposes to vaccine mandates. “It’s NOT about healthcare and safety or effectiveness of vaccines, it is about freedom of choice. It’s about personal bodily sovereignty. No person should have control over another’s body without their consent.”[25]
In 2019 the organization posted a video from an immunologist about childhood vaccines.[26][27] In 2021, they posted videos from immunologist Dr. Ryan Cole who speaks of reservations about vaccinations for the COVID recovered at the Idaho Central District Health Meeting.[28] In November 2016, the group’s blog posted a 2013 study, that the flu shot increases risk of fetal death.[3] The claim is contradicted by the bulk of research on miscarriage and the flu shot and the post was rated False by Politifact.[3] This post would go on to circulate widely on Politifact in 2019.[3]
During Idaho’s 2017 legislative session, Health Freedom Idaho advocated a bill that would hold schools accountable to the law allows parents to provide a letter written by the parent to exempt their child from vaccination requirements rather than using a school-provided form to do so.[18] The form created by the health department required parents to sign incriminating and to acknowledge that “I am aware that my child may contract a vaccine-preventable disease.”[19] The bill died without receiving a hearing in the Senate.[18] “The form developed by IDHW exceeded the scope of the Idaho Statutes (section 39-1118(2) or 39-4802(2), Idaho Code;). The state prescribed form based on IDAPA 16.02.15, is in violation of Idaho Code 39-4802 and 39-4804.” In January 2018, an Idaho Senate panel introduced a bill similar to the 2017 bill with the support of Health Freedom Idaho, which never received a hearing.[20] In 2020, due to the persistence of the organization and the legislators advocating on behalf of parents, the rules were changed to line up with the statute and amended to include the acceptance of a parent-signed statement.
In 2019, Heath Freedom Idaho opposed a new state administrative rule requiring students entering 12th grade to get a meningitisbooster shot. [29] The rule was ultimately adopted.[21]
After years of advocating, a 2021 House Bill 298 passed requiring the schools and daycares to advise parents of their right to a vaccine exemption for religious, philosophical, or medical reasons. [30]
“School officials shall describe the exemptions provided in this section and provide a citation to this section in any communication to parents and guardians regarding immunization.” [31] See also Idaho Code 39-4804 which details that vaccines are not mandatory, may be refused, parents are entitled to information about complications, and that opting out may not be used against a parent in any way.
COVID-19 related protests
Health Freedom Idaho has organized, co-organized, and participated in several protests of health measures taken by the Idaho state government and the City of Boise in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These have included protests of the stay-home order issued by governorBrad Little in April 2020, of mask orders issued by the City of Boise, and of emergency legislation considered by the state legislature related to mail-in voting and protection from COVID-19 related liability for businesses and government bodies.[22][4][1][23][24][25][26][8] They also organized a demonstration at a hospital in which thousands of citizens lined the main thoroughfare in protest of the hospital’s decision to require staff to be vaccinated against COVID-19.[32]
Health Freedom Idaho did not participate in protests that included demonstrations outside the homes of officials, such as those of governor Brad Little, the health officials participating in a Central District Health meeting, and a police officer who arrested former Health Freedom Idaho member Sarah Walton Brady for refusing to leave a park that was closed due to the pandemic.[1][31][32][33]
However, events coordinated other locations included the Idaho State Capitol, outside the Boise City Hall, and the parking lot of the Central District Health Center Offices.[2][25][23][33][34]
Some demonstrations included setting a fire in which masks were burned, and the open carrying of firearms was noted at protests which is common in Idaho.[25][34][8][5][28][7][4]
One of the more distinctive demonstrations was a call for a special legislative session supported by two dozen legislators who understood the governor’s response to the pandemic had exceeded expiration and extended past the 60-day limit.[2][35][36] The Health Freedom Idaho continues to advise citizens of the ‘state of emergency’ that as of October 2021, exceeds 580 days. [37]
Another notable event occurred on August 24, 2020, at the Idaho State Capitol. Citizens were attempting to enter the public galley to listen to the legislative floor debate. Officials attempted to lock out the public by closing the doors on them. While citizens chanted “This is our house!” officers tugged the door closed and citizens attempted to keep the door open, in the struggle glass door broke.[38] National news made a point to mention that some participants carried weapons (which is a common occurrence in Idaho) while attending the special legislative session to consider bills on early voting and shielding businesses and government bodies from legal liability related to COVID-19.[22][4]
Health Freedom Idaho’s executive director also urged group members to participate in a protest of Biden’s visit to the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise on September 13, 2021, a demonstration was on behalf of several causes, including opposition to the vaccine mandate announced by President Biden the previous week.[35]
Conservative People of Canyon County speech about our ‘state of emergency’ all powers given to the governor to do as he pleases. The facts reveal that we aren’t in an emergency and that the law makes no provision for this extended length of dictatorship.
The concern is immunity. So what about Natural Immunity from the COVID recovered?
In this clip from October 15, 2021, at the Central District Health Meeting, Dr. Ryan Cole answers the question of natural immunity COVID recovered. Central Health District Board discusses the rate of vaccination and natural immunity COVID recovered posing the question are we close to reaching herd immunity? Should those with natural immunity/previously infected be exempt from vaccination? Health Board Member was unable to provide statistics readily available to the public. These were added by HFI as a screenshot overlay from the coronavirus.idaho.gov website. According to Idaho’s government website: https://coronavirus.idaho.gov/ 1/3 of the Ada County population is Air Force (mandated vaccinations) 809,091 People fully vaccinated* statewide with 276,862 Cases (Total includes confirmed and probable cases) out of a population of 1,839,106.
The 9th and 10th amendments of the US Constitution.
THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY. 