Author: Health Freedom Idaho

  • Red, White and Broccoli

    Broccoli can be started in the summer to enjoy in the fall at least that’s what the old farmer’s almanac says. Are you an avid gardener willing to share your wisdom on planting times? Let food be they medicine – growing your own is the best way to know what’s on your food!! 

    When summer is in full swing and Independence Day is right around the corner, believe it or not, it’s time to turn your thoughts towards fall gardening. If you’re already missing those crunchy heads of broccoli, you can ensure a supply during the fall by sowing some broccoli directly or in trays. Plant broccoli for a fall crop in July, for short season areas, and September, for long season areas. If you’re wondering when, exactly, is a good time to plant your broccoli our Seed Planting Calculator is a great resource. Plug in your first frost date and the calculator will give you an estimated planting date for all of our cool season seeds.

    There are several types of broccoli: large head, sprouting, romanesco, raab and Chinese broccoli. Tricia shows you how to plant, grow, and fend off common pests in our latest video on growing broccoli.

    Large Head

    Large Head Broccoli
    Like the name implies, these are the varieties to plant if you want one, big, tight central head. Large head broccoli is most likely what comes to your mind when someone says “broccoli”. These types need a lot of elbow room, or else they form smaller heads. After you’ve harvested the central head, don’t uproot the plant, keep it going and harvest the leaves and any possible side shoots that may form. Broccoli leaves can be used just like kale. Large head varieties include: ‘Arcadia’, ‘Belstar’, ‘Munchkin’, ‘Nutri-Bud’ and ‘Packman’. If you want a good blend try this mix from Renee’s Garden Seeds.

    Sprouting

    Spouting Broccoli
    This type of broccoli forms a smaller, looser central head than the large head types, but it also forms numerous smaller side shoots after the central head has been cut. Harvest the side shoots often to to keep the plant producing. Sprouting broccoli varieties are the favorites for growing in the fall. They typically preform much better in fall than in spring. Some delicious sprouting varieties are: ‘Calabrese’, ‘De Cicco’, ‘Purple Peacock’, and ‘Purple Sprouting’.

    Romanesco

    Romanesco
    Romanesco is the super model of broccoli types. Grow it for striking chartreuse heads that form mathematical spirals and mild, nutty taste. Romanesco requires a bit more fertilizer than other types of broccoli and benefits from a mid-growth side dressing of an organic vegetable fertilizer. Some delicious romanesco varieties are: ‘Natalino’, ‘Romanesco Italia’, and‘Veronica’

    Raab and Chinese Broccoli

    Broccolini
    These types form a multitude of small, loose, shoots and are enjoyed as much for the florets as for the tender stalks. Chinese broccoli is sometimes called “broccolini” and can be enjoyed like asparagus. Raab is not actually a broccoli, but a type of turnip grown for it’s shoots and stalks. Some raab varieties are bred specifically for either fall or spring performance, so read seed descriptions carefully. Try varieties such as: ‘Early Fall Rapini’, ‘Raab Spring Rapini’, ‘Sessantina’, ‘Sorrento’, ‘Zamboni’ and ‘Te You.’

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.groworganic.com/organic-gardening/articles/red-white-and-broccoli?utm_source=GrowOrganic+General+Newsletter+List&utm_campaign=1dce4e3197-Newsletter_broccoli_2017&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_da906cf41d-1dce4e3197-201272445&mc_cid=1dce4e3197&mc_eid=bc67013f8c.
  • Why Your Drinking Water May Be Killing You: FREE EVENT Twin Falls

    HFI: Why Your Drinking Water May Be Killing You. Dr. Chad Nielson will be having an informational meeting about water quality on July 27th at 7 pm at Nielson Family Chiropractic 1330 Filer Ave. E. Twin Falls. This is a free event and all are welcome.

    —–

    After reading this article, you will never look at tap water the same way again.  Most Americans have generally assumed that the water coming out of our taps is perfectly safe, but the Flint water crisis and other similar incidents are starting to help people to understand that there are some very dangerous substances in our water.  In particular, I am talking about things like arsenic, lead, atrazine, perchlorate and a whole host of pharmaceutical drugs.  According to an absolutely stunning NRDC report, close to 77 million Americans received their water from systems “that violated federal protections” in 2015.  And even if you get your water from a system that meets federal standards, that still does not mean that it is safe.

    Let’s start by talking about arsenic.  Earlier today I came across an article that talked about how levels of arsenic in the water at some schools in the San Joaquin Valley “exceed the maximum federal safety levels by as much as three times”

    Reef-Sunset Unified School District Superintendent David East is worried about water. Not because of the drought—record rains this past winter ended five years of dry times. Rather, East, whose district encompasses the small towns of Avenal and Kettleman City on the San Joaquin Valley’s west side, is worried about the safety of the water that the 2,700 students in his school district are being given to drink.

    That’s because arsenic levels in the drinking water at some schools in the San Joaquin Valley exceed the maximum federal safety levels by as much as three times. And arsenic is not the only threat to schoolchildren. High levels of pesticides, nitrate, bacteria, and naturally occurring uranium also contaminate groundwater in many rural parts of the state.

    The International Agency for Research on Cancer says that arsenic is a “group 1 carcinogen”, and if you get too much of it in your system it can kill you.  Sadly, the EPA has estimated that 36 million Americans are drinking tap water that contains dangerous levels of arsenic.

    In addition to arsenic, a very nasty pesticide known as “atrazine” is often found in tap water supplies.  The following information about atrazine comes from the NRDC

    This endocrine-disrupting chemical is one of the most commonly detected pesticides in U.S. waters. NRDC studies have found its contamination is most common in drinking water across the Midwest and the southern United States. 

    Perchlorate is another very dangerous substance that is commonly found in our drinking water.  According to the NRDC, perchlorate has been discovered in water supplies “in at least 26 states”…

    This widespread toxic chemical, used in rocket fuel, explosives, and road flares, can interfere with thyroid hormone production. Perchlorate has been detected in the water in at least 26 states, yet there is no federal standard for its presence in drinking water. 

    Of course lead in the water has been getting a tremendous amount of attention because of what happened in Flint, Michigan.  The lawsuits that will come out of this case could take decades to resolve

    Flint’s water problems began in April 2014, when the city, in an attempt to save money, switched the town’s water source from Lake Huron to the Flint River. In the switch, officials failed to add a $200-per-day anti-corrosion agent that would coat the city’s antiquated pipes. The omission would prove disastrous as lead from the pipes began to leach into the water that flowed out of the tap, endangering thousands of children. Officials asserted it was “safe to drink,” above the outcry of residents who suspected the brown, odorous water was contaminated.

    The first outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease — a serious type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria — hit by summer. According to the water crisis interim investigation report released last week, Lyon and others knew about outbreaks for nearly a year before the public was notified and an emergency was declared. In all, a dozen people died from Legionnaires’ disease, though residents suspect there may be other victims who were never tested for the bacteria.

    But Flint is far from alone.  In fact, this week there have been headlines about serious problems with lead in the water in Chicago.

    Wherever there are old pipes, lead in the water is potentially a massive problem.

    On top of everything else, our water systems are becoming increasingly polluted by pharmaceutical drugs.  An EPA study actually found traces of more than two dozen pharmaceutical drugs in more than half of the water systems that were tested around the country…

    Conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency, it is the largest study of water coming out of wastewater treatment plants.

    It looked at samples from 50 large-size wastewater treatment plants nationwide and tested for 56 drugs including oxycodone, high-blood pressure medications, and over-the-counter drugs like Tylenol and ibuprofen. More than half the samples tested positive for at least 25 of the drugs monitored, the study said. High blood pressure medications appeared in the highest concentrations and most frequently.

    “We were surprised to find that many drugs occurring across all the wastewater plants,” said Mitchell Kostich, the EPA research biologist who led the study. “We were also surprised to see so many drugs of a particular class—the high blood pressure medications—appear at those levels across the board.”

    So those that drink tap water coming from these polluted systems are actually ingesting small amounts of dozens of different pharmaceutical drugs every single day.

    No wonder so many of us are walking around like zombies.

    So how did all of these drugs get into the water?  The following comes from WebMD

    According to the investigation, the drugs get into the drinking water supply through several routes: some people flush unneeded medication down toilets; other medicine gets into the water supply after people take medication, absorb some, and pass the rest out in urine or feces. Some pharmaceuticals remain even after wastewater treatments and cleansing by water treatment plants, the investigation showed.

    Are you starting to understand what an environmental nightmare we are facing?

    But in addition to everything that you just read, many water systems around the country actually add toxic substances to the water purposely.

    Of course the most prominent example of this is fluoride.  We are told that fluoride “reduces cavities” even though this has never been scientifically proven.  But what we do know is that fluoride is a highly dangerous neurotoxin that can have a very serious impact on early childhood development

    Scientific investigations have revealed that fluoride is an endocrine-disrupting chemical,1 and a developmental neurotoxin that impacts short-term and working memory, and lowers IQ in children.2 It has been implicated as a contributing factor in the rising rates of both attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD)3,4 and thyroid disease.

    And we also know that fluoride can cause a condition known as “fluorosis”, and the introduction of fluoride into our water systems has coincided with a dramatic rise in fluorosis all over the nation.  In fact, more than half the children in the entire country have now been affected…

    According to research presented at the April 2017 National Oral Health Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 57 percent of youth between the ages of 6 and 19 years have dental fluorosis, a condition in which your tooth enamel becomes progressively discolored and mottled, according to data from 2011 to 2012.1

    In addition, studies have shown that fluoride can also contribute to “cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity and neurodegenerative disease.”

    Because of such overwhelming scientific evidence, fluoride in the water has already been completely banned in many industrialized countries, and if I end up in Washington I will push for a complete national ban on fluoride in the water in the United States.

    All of us should be able to agree that we need to do whatever we can to keep the water that we are drinking clean and safe.

    But until we can get this done, I would encourage everyone to either filter their drinking water or to get it from a source that they know is pure.

    By drinking such polluted water, we are literally poisoning ourselves and our children, and we have no choice but to get this problem fixed.

    This article originally appeared at: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/environmental-nightmare-dozens-of-highly-toxic-substances-have-been-found-in-tap-water-all-over-america.
  • The Health Freedom Movement Is About Human Rights

    The Health Freedom Movement has MILLIONS protesting in non-stop demonstrations all across Italy! For over a month Italians have been protesting in every city against a brutal proposed law that if approved will make 53 doses of vaccines mandatory. They’re not only fighting for their own children, they’re fighting to MAKE SURE these heinous laws do not pass in other countries. UNITY is an unstoppable force!
    Here In the U.S. and in our home state of Idaho we must stand togetherhold our ground against a tide of laws and mandates that intend on stripping us of basic human rights. 

    Do you see what is happening in Italy, my freedom loving friends? Millions of people are taking to the streets to rally for their human rights.   I am hearing from people with family members in Italy that they are rallying every single day.  They are shouting that they will not give into these mandates.   They are shouting to their government that it is their human right to make decisions for their own children’s health and well-being.    

    Sadly an update from Italy. November 22, 2017 Italy lost the appeal.

    Italy lost! The terrible news arrives as the Constitutional Court rejects the appeal against the new 10 mandatory vaccines (56 mandatory doses by age 16). The Constitutional Court just rejected the appeal of the Italian region of Veneto and of the consumers associations. The 10 vaccines law stays in effect. If parents refuse to vaccinate their child loses educational rights or the family must pay a € 500 per vaccine per year to send the child to school.


    Italy: Vaccines, the Constitutional Court pronounces: LEGAL DECREE http://ow.ly/p7lE30gKmQW

    Press Office of the Constitutional Court
    Communication of 22 November 2017
    Obligation of legitimate vaccines in the current context

    At the hearing yesterday, in front of the Constitutional Court, were discussed the numerous issues of constitutional legitimacy promoted by the Veneto Region on Decree Law no. 73 of 2017, converted into law no. 119 of 2017 on compulsory vaccinations for children up to 16 years of age. The questions submitted to the Constitutional Court did not call into question the effectiveness of vaccinations – attested by the institutions appointed to it (World Health Organization, the Higher Health Institute) and a long series of national vaccination plans – but their mandate, suspended by Veneto Region with a 2007 law that had introduced a system of infectious disease prevention based only on persuasion.

    The Court stated that all the questions raised were unfounded. According to the Constitutional Court, the measures in question are a choice of the national legislature. This choice is not unreasonable as it aims to protect individual and collective health and is based on the duty of solidarity in preventing and limiting the spread of certain diseases. The Court considered, inter alia, that all compulsory vaccinations had already been envisaged and recommended in national vaccination plans and funded by the State under the Essential Health Levels (Lea). In addition, the transition from a strategy based on persuasion to a compulsory system is justified in the light of the current context characterized by a gradual drop in vaccine coverage.

    Finally, failure to vaccinate does not exclude children from compulsory schooling, which will normally be included in classes where other pupils are vaccinated.

    Rome, November 22, 2017 Palazzo della Consulta, Piazza del Quirinale 41 Rome – Tel. 46981-4224 / 4511

    http://www.cortecostituzionale.it//CC_CS_20171122142508.pdf

    Join HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO TODAY.

    There are many areas that we need to hold the line. Our food, our water, our air, our body autonomy..health freedom applies to all these. We must amplify our voice, hold law makers accountable. We can not do that without your help. Your small membership fee is a small way to help us focus on these big issues. 

  • ITALY MANDATES 12 VACCINES, TRIPLING MANDATORY VACCINES

    Vaccine Mandates. We are truly at a tipping point. Globally. We either stand up or we will be owned and the bodies of our children will belong to the corporations. This isn’t an exaggeration. This is a fact. Look at Italy – tripling the vaccine mandates July 2017. France vaccine mandates effective 2018.
    They are poisoning our food, our air, our water, and now they are wanting to tell us what they will inject into our bodies.

    Forget how you feel about vaccines. What other right do you hold more sacred than the right to say what goes into the bodies of your children?

    We have to do better. We have to be proactive. We cannot wait until something more severe happens and try and get people to act on the defense. 

    ITALY Over 70,000 people are marching in Italy July 2017 against the mandated vaccine laws that tripled the number of forced vaccines in the country! The most dangerous place for any one to be is between a mother and her child. This has to stop. Italians are taking to the streets by the thousands to protest mandatory vaccination. France has just passed a law mandating vaccines effective 2018.

    The time is now.

    This is why HFI exists. This is why we are fighting so hard in Idaho against any type of mandated treatments, ‘medicine’, vaccines, chemo, etc. and why we need EVERY state to join us. We cannot wait until they force it on us like in Italy.

    In an unprecedented way, the decree-law proposed by the Minister of Health has been signed by the sitting Italian president Sergio Mattarella. Only four vaccines were mandatory in Italy, now that number triples to 12.

    The 12 shots will be free of charge to the family, Italy has universal health care, but also has an enormous national debt, which makes critics wonder about the where and the how will the government find the funds to pay for those 8 new vaccines.

    No other decree-law has moved so fast in the Italian legislative system, the reasons of such hurry are incomprehensible considering that the Istituto Superiore Di Sanità (the local version of the CDC) has declared that contrary to what stated in the decree itself there is no objective urgency. There are no epidemics, the number of cases of measles or meningitis in the current year have been substantially lower than the previous year.

    Thousands of parents have protested the new law this past June 3rd,  protests and marches have taken place in 21 Italian cities spread across the nation. A national protest is scheduled for this Sunday June 11th.

     

    Here you find the translated full text of the decree-law:  http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaDettaglioAtto/originario?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2017-06-07&atto.codiceRedazionale=17G00095&elenco30giorni=true

     

    Join Health Freedom Idaho. Help us Amplify Our Voice against Pharmaceutical Driven Mandates and Control over our Health Care Choices, Informed Consent and Parental Authority.

  • New CDC Director PRO VACCINES

    Brenda Fitzgerald of Georgia has been named director of the CDC. Shame on you President Donald Trump. Wasn’t it the Health Freedom Loving citizens that greatly helped you get into the highest office of our land? Haven’t we been waiting and hoping for you to do something to help our cause that would show support to those that supported you? By naming vaccine advocate Brenda Fitzgerald to run the CDC you have let us down, sir….you have let us down @realDonaldTrump. – Miste Karlfeldt, Executive Director Health Freedom Idaho

    After backing candidate Donald Trump last year, antivaccine activists may feel betrayed in his administration’s latest move to name vaccine advocate Brenda Fitzgerald to run the CDC. At the same time, the medical community will likely breathe a sigh of relief on the nomination.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price named Fitzgerald to the critical post Friday.

    After serving as the Georgia Department of Public Health commissioner and as a state health officer for six years, Fitzgerald will replace acting CDC Director Dr. Anne Schuchat. Before Schuchat, Tom Frieden served as CDC director for 8 years under the Obama Administration.

    In a series of tweets Friday, Frieden supported the appointment.

    Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald next CDC Director. Her health commissioner experience important. Listening to & supporting CDC staff, she can succeed.

    — Dr. Tom Frieden (@DrFrieden) July 7, 2017

    As head of the CDC, Fitzgerald will be responsible for U.S. vaccination policy and much more. The position doesn’t require Senate confirmation.

    After fears that President Trump may push for a change in vaccine policy on autism concerns, her appointment will likely be a relief to medical professionals. In numerous public statements, Fitzgerald has supported vaccination.

    In April, Fitzgerald said in a statement that “immunizations are the best way to protect infants and children from childhood diseases, like whooping cough and measles that can be life-threatening at young ages.”

    She continued that it’s “critical for parents to talk to their child’s doctor to ensure they are up-to-date on immunizations, because no child should have to suffer a vaccine-preventable illness.”

    Ahead of the nomination, antivaccine group Autism Investigated posted an open letter to President Trump urging him to “withdraw any consideration” for Fitzgerald due to her vaccine stance. In the letter, the website’s editor Jake Crosby brought up Trump’s campaign promises to look into vaccine safety and pointed out that “many people voted for you this past election” because of those promises.

    Even before Fitzgerald’s nomination, antivaccine activists were disappointed with Trump’s appointment for FDA head, Scott Gottlieb, who has said any theories of a link between vaccines and autism have been “thoroughly debunked.”

    For her part, Fitzgerald wrote an op-ed titled “Babies need their vaccines” in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution back in 2014. In the piece, she makes clear her thoughts on immunizations.

    “I’ve heard all the arguments against vaccination,” she wrote in opinion piece. “All have been debunked, including the infamous 1980s study in Europe about a similar vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella, and a supposed link—that we now know to be false—to autism, which shattered vaccine use in Europe.”

    Fitzgerald’s nomination seems to be a reversal from candidate Trump’s campaign statements of a link between vaccines and autism, and from a pledge he reportedly made to vaccine skeptic Robert Kennedy, Jr., to start a governmental panel looking into the issue. The White House disputed the claim, but Kennedy, Jr., later said he still had the president’s support.

    Read more on

    This article originally appeared at: http://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/trump-administration-picks-pro-vaccine-cdc-director.
  • MTHFR Genetic Mutation

    This genetic mutation (MTHFR) is one major reason why some individuals have an increased risk of vaccine injury. This is a major contributor to why some infants and toddlers die or become permanently injured within a week or two of their shots. The good news is that, while we used to think that our genes were static and there was nothing we could do about them, we now know that isn’t true! An emerging science called epigenetics shows us that genes can be both turned on and turned off!Learn more from Amy Myers MD

    ——————————————-
    MTHFR is a genetic mutation associated with a risk of adverse events from vaccination:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/18454680/
    ——————————————-

    But ultimately, MTHFR is not the problem. The problem is that when we vaccinate, we are essentially injecting children with poison in order to provoke an immune response. A genetically susceptible child who suffers severely or dies as a result of their shots would have remained healthy had they not been poisoned. Period.

    Besides MTHFR, other genetic traits, and heritable burdens of toxicity, factors that can affect one’s ability to detoxify are diet/nutrition, stress levels, and other toxic environmental exposures (in our air, food, water, body care products, medicines/drugs/vaccines, etc.).

    Unfortunately, Americans have one of the worst, most unhealthy diets of any population on earth, we typically have high stress levels, our drinking water is not safe (in my opinion), our food is poisoned with pesticides and herbicides, we are being sprayed with toxic chemicals for mosquito abatement (among other sources of air pollution), our body care products are full of carcinogenic compounds (parabens, for example), and we are highly medicated and vaccinated.

    So here I am.
    I have one C677T mutation (50% detoxifier) and developed several health issues which impacted my quality of life, in my mid-20s, including an autoimmune disease. My son has two C677T mutations (only 10% detoxifier) and was injured by the few delayed vaccines he received as an infant and toddler. He’s had food allergies, reflux, chronic intermittent abdominal pain, eczema, cognitive and motor developmental delays, tics, myoclonus, sensory processing disorder. My husband developed a severe autoimmune disease when he was 18, and although we haven’t tested him, it is likely he has two mutations just as my son does.

    THIS IS WHY, after getting my degree in toxicology, after reading and reading and reading some more, further educating myself on the science and occurrence of toxicity in our lives, on the science of vaccines and what’s IN them, that I have chosen NOT to vaccinate. I am 100% confident in this decision.

    Instead, I am focusing on reducing my family’s exposure to toxic substances, decreasing stress, and dramatically improving the quality of the food we eat and amount of nutrition we receive through simply eating a diet nearly entirely made up of fruits and veggies (which have all been scientifically found to help the body detoxify and otherwise thrive).  – Ashley Cates

    Educate yourself. The earth is a beautiful place to live, but our lives have become inundated with toxicity on all fronts – vaccines being the worst offender by far. Don’t take that unnecessary risk. Despite the propaganda from the industrial-media complex, vaccines are not necessary, not truly even effective as we have been taught to believe they are, and only cause harm.

    Read: Did Vaccines Eradicate Diseases in the 20th Century?
    http://visionlaunch.com/vaccines-eradicate-diseases-20th-c…/

  • What Do We Really Know About Roundup Weed Killer? What can we do about it?

    HFI: Glyphosate has been called a carcinogen by a world health organization. Now that glyphosate is on the Prop 65 carcinogen list, activists and city officials have increased support for discontinuing or banning the use of glyphosate, all around the world. With 1 out of 2 males and 1 out of 3 females expected to get cancer in America today, and the health care costs skyrocketing beyond our government resources, it makes no sense to continue to spray a carcinogenic chemical on our food crops, playgrounds, sidewalks, parks and back yards. None.
    NOW is the time to speak up. express concern. Demand the product to be eliminated from public spaces. 

    Excerpt of Article from National Geographic: 

    A farmer in central Illinois sprays his cornfield with glyphosate. Seeds have been genetically engineered to tolerate the chemical so farmers can apply it to entire fields without destroying crops. As a result, its use has skyrocketed but some experts say research is needed exploring what happens to it in the environment and how much people are exposed.

    Photograph by Seth Perlman, AP

    The world’s most widely-used herbicide has been getting a lot of attention lately.

    Last month, an international agency declared glyphosate, the primary ingredient in the popular product Roundup,  a “probable human carcinogen.” The weed killer also has made recent headlines for its widespread use on genetically modified seeds and research that links it to antibiotics resistance and hormone disruption. Several national governmentsare planning to restrict its use, and some school districts are talking about banning it.

    So what do we know about glyphosate? Five key questions and answers:

    How Is Glyphosate Used?

    Introduced commercially by Monsanto  in 1974, glyphosate kills weeds by blocking proteins essential to plant growth.  It is now used in more than 160 countries, with more than 1.4 billion pounds applied per year.

    Glyphosate, often sold under the brand name Roundup, is probably in your garage or shed because it’s ranked as the second most widely used U.S. lawn and garden weed killer. These products have been promoted as easy-to-use and effective on poison ivy, kudzu, dandelions, and other weeds.

    But the primary use is by agriculture. Nearly allthe corn, soy, and cotton now grown in the United States is treated with glyphosate.

    Its use skyrocketed after seeds were genetically engineeredto tolerate the chemical. Because these seeds produce plants that are not killed by glyphosate, farmers can apply the weed killer to entire fields without worrying about destroying crops. Between 1987 and 2012, annual U.S. farm use grew from less than 11 million pounds to nearly 300 million pounds.

    “By far the vast use is on [genetically engineered] crops – corn, soy and cotton – that took off in the early to mid-nineties,” says Robert Gilliom, chief of surface water assessment for the US Geological Survey’s National Water Quality Assessment Program.

    In addition, some five million acres in California were treated with glyphosate in 2012 to grow almonds, peaches, onions, cantaloupe, cherries, sweet corn, citrus, grapes, and other edible crops.

    Glyphosate, marketed by Monsanto as Roundup, is the second most popular weed killer for residential yards and gardens.

    What Happens to Glyphosate in the Environment?

    Despite its widespread use, USGS hydrologist Paul Capel said there is “a dearth of information” on what happens to it once it is used.

    Glyphosate is not included in the U.S. government’s testing of food for pesticide residues or the monitoring of chemicals in human blood and tissues. As a result, there is no information on how much people are exposed to from using it in their yards, living near farms or eating foods from treated fields.
    However you can see its found on food in independent testing. http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2016/02/how-much-monsanto-s-weed-killer-your-food

    A recent USGS study sampled waterways in 38 states and found glyphosate in the majority of rivers, streams, ditches, and wastewater treatment plant outfalls tested. Not much was found in groundwater because it binds tightly to soil.

    Glyphosate also was found in about 70 percent of rainfall samples. It “attaches pretty firmly to soil particles” that are swept off farm fields then stay in “the atmosphere for a relatively long time until they dissolve off into water,” Capel says.

    What About Exposure Through Food?

    Before genetically engineered crops, glyphosate residues in food were considered unlikely, says Charles Benbrook, research professor at Washington State University’s Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources. But since about 2005, pre-harvest use of glyphosate “results in very high residues,” he says. Traceswere found in 90 percent of 300 soybean samples.

    So what is the likelihood of exposure? The people most likely to be exposed are working on or living near farms where glyphosate is used, says University of California, Irvine professor Bruce Blumberg.

    What Is known About Effects on Human Health?

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had determined that the science “does not provide evidence to show that glyphosate causes cancer.” But now the EPA says it will analyzenew findings by the UN’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, which declared in March that glyphosate probably raises the risk of cancer in people exposed.

    The UN agency based its decision on human, animal, and cell studies, says National Cancer Institute scientist emeritus, Aaron Blair who chaired the IARC review committee. The studies found glyphosate in farmworkers’ blood and urine, chromosomal damage in cells, increased risks of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in some people exposed, and tumor formation in some animal studies.

    The big unanswered question is the potential health effect of low levels over extended periods of time. 

    Monsanto called the IARC conclusion “inconsistent with decades of ongoing comprehensive safety assessments.” The American Soybean Association and National Corn Growers Association also denounced the finding. CropLife America, a trade association representing pesticide manufacturers, says, “It’s important to remember that glyphosate acts on an enzyme that exists only in plants and not mammals, contributing to the low risk to human health.”

    One study suggests that glyphosate may affect pathogens such as Salmonella in ways that can contribute to antibiotic resistance. Other recent research suggests it can interfere with hormones.

    Yet the really big unanswered question is the potential health effect of low levels over extended periods of time.

    So Where Does This Leave Us?

     July 7, 2017, was a historic day for our movement. It is the day that the California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Agency (OEHHA) officially listed glyphosate on the Prop 65 list warning list as a carcinogen. The implications are huge. Within a year, all companies with ten employees or more who manufacture products that expose humans to glyphosate will need to label that product with a warning such as “This product may contain a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.” 

     

     This is huge news for health advocates and regulators in other states and countries around the world who want more evidence to transition away from using glyphosate and toxic chemicals. 

    Now that glyphosate is on the Prop 65 carcinogen list, activists and city officials have increased support for discontinuing or banning the use of glyphosate, all around the world. With 1 out of 2 males and 1 out of 3 females expected to get cancer in America today, and the health care costs skyrocketing beyond our government resources, it makes no sense to continue to spray a carcinogenic chemical on our food crops, playgrounds, sidewalks, parks and back yards. None.

    Now is the time to SPEAK UP! Express your concern to legislators, City Councils, Parks and Recreations and your neighbors about the use of a carcinogenic chemicals in public spaces. 

    #EliminateGlyphosate 

    This article originally appeared at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/04/150422-glyphosate-roundup-herbicide-weeds/.
  • High Level of Radiation Exposure Concerns at Eagle High School

     HFI: Studies show that prolonged exposure to radiation from cell phone WiFi towers can cause illness and health damages in children and adults. The West Ada Board of Trustees approved a cell tower which was installed on the Eagle High School property in early 2017. A meter that measures RF radiation was rented and readings were taken inside and outside of Eagle High School. And what was found was disturbing. There were levels observed up to 66,667% higher than the levels that have been shown in studies to cause biological effects/changes, and up to 40,000% higher where students sit in some classrooms. This is measuring the same radiation that is used in microwaves. This is constant exposure. Students and faculty have no choice to ‘turn it off’ as you can with a cell phone or computer. 

     Please go here to find out the measurements observed, information about studies that have been done and recommendations for levels of radiation and more in-depth information.
    http://www.eaglehealing.com/radiation.php

    TAKE ACTIONS: Please go here to sign the petition to have the cell tower removed and pass a law banning cell towers from school property. There is plenty of information out there to show there is damage being done, and we shouldn’t be having out children and teachers being exposed to this. Why take that risk?
    https://www.change.org/p/west-ada-board-of-trustees-remove-…

    The West Ada Board of Trustees approved a cell tower which was installed on the Eagle High School property in early 2017.
    A meter that measures RF radiation was rented and readings were taken inside and outside of Eagle High School. And what was found was disturbing. There were levels observed up to 66,667% higher than the levels that have been shown in studies to cause biological effects/changes, and up to 40,000% higher where students sit in some classrooms.

    Here’s a small description of the radiation being emitted from cell phones, WI-FI, cell towers, as well as any device which uses those things. This is a microwave radiation, the same as what your microwave uses to cook food.

    Devices such as cell phones, cordless phones, baby monitors, laptops, tablets, game consoles, etc are considered two-way microwave devices. The difference between all of those devices and cell tower masts is that they can be turned off. They can be kept at a distance from the body to minimize the risk. And people have a choice as to whether to use them or not. With cell masts, there is no ability to turn them off. It’s 24/7/365. So if you work at or attend that school for many years, those people are exposed to the radiation that was measured. And the levels in some of the classrooms were higher than using a cell phone.

    Resources for research: Dirty electricity is everywhere. Undiagnosable illness can be a result of exposure to this source of electromagnetic pollution. Implementing these changes may eliminate symptoms, thus eliminating illness. Limiting or avoiding exposure to dirty electricity is beneficial for everyone, avoiding sickness in the first place.

    Sources for this article include:

    http://electromagnetichealth.org

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS5ogZxoZ2Y

    http://www.dirtyelectricity.ca/dirty_electricity_four_components.htm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhp8t6rVews&feature=player_embedded

    http://www.thenaturalrecoveryplan.com

    http://www.electricsense.com/

  • Idaho School Vaccinates Child WITHOUT Parent Permission

    HFI: Meridian, Idaho. A trial IN-SCHOOL VACCINE PROGRAM accidentally vaccinated a child WITHOUT parental permission. The parent, who wanted to make sure that her child was vaccinated in a doctor’s office, was furious! Schools are a place for learning NOT a place for administering ‘preventative’ medical treatment. Informed consent and RESPECT for parental authority is a paramount right that is being ignored by schools and doctors nationwide. Alan Phillips, vaccine rights attorney says, “Even for parents who want their child vaccinated, when the school does it without their permission, they  (parents) wonder: What else will they do without my permission? It’s the slippery-slope idea,” Phillips tells Yahoo Parenting. “It raises a very important constitutional issue, which is that parents have a fundamental right — under the 14th amendment, as has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in long line of past cases — to parent their children. That includes medical decision-making, with various exceptions in the law including emergencies and other compelling reasons… But a flu shot is not a compelling reason [to make an exception].” HFI wants to know WHY is this program in our state to begin with? 

    2014 From Yahoo News: 

    An Idaho third-grader received a flu vaccine at his public school without parental consent last week — the result of a “mix-up,” according to the West Ada School District — leaving angry mom Letisha Huff wanting answers from officials there.

    “These are our children, they’re not guinea pigs,” Huff tells local news station KTVB. “Either get it right, or don’t do it at all.” Yahoo Parenting was not able to reach Huff for additional comment.

    But school district spokesperson Eric Exline says that Huff’s son Zachary, 8, inadvertently received the FluMist vaccine when the signed permission slip of another Zachary in his class — who was absent that day — was mistaken as his. Current procedure for the pilot program has slips signed by parents going from student to teacher to nurse, who double checks each child’s medical records for red flags such as asthma. Then the slips go back to the classroom, where they are doled out to kids who must bring their signed form with them to the in-school clinic for their vaccine. To insure a mix-up like this doesn’t happen again, Exline tells Yahoo Parenting, “We’re working on adding an extra step at the classroom level.”

    Still, says Huff, who explains she’s not against the flu vaccine but that she’d wanted it administered in a doctor’s office, “This isn’t something we should be practicing. They should know what they’re doing.”

    FLU SHOTS FACTS: 

    Schools have been known to occasionally vaccinate minors without parental consent, upsetting parents — pro-vaccine or not — because of their lack of control in the situation.

    In 2012, a 14-year-old public-school student in Detroit was given four shots, including one for HPV, without permission from home; shortly thereafter, the girl developed a severe rash, leaving her mother “angry with everybody” for administering vaccines she “never wanted her to have.” Last year in Canada, a 14-year-old girl was given tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis inoculations at her school without either a medical background check or parental consent; her parents were shocked and upset to learn that the law there does not require consent for kids 14 and over. And two New York City students received a swine flu vaccination without parental consent back in 2009, a misstep that prompted a city health department official to pledge they were working “to implement additional safeguards.”

    Though typically done in error, shots administered at school without parental consent raises an issue that goes beyond parents’ personal vaccine philosophies, according to Alan Phillips, a national vaccine-rights attorney based in North Carolina. “Even for parents who want their child vaccinated, when the school does it without their permission, they wonder: What else will they do without my permission? It’s the slippery-slope idea,” Phillips tells Yahoo Parenting. “It raises a very important constitutional issue, which is that parents have a fundamental right — under the 14th amendment, as has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in long line of past cases — to parent their children. That includes medical decision-making, with various exceptions in the law including emergencies and other compelling reasons… But a flu shot is not a compelling reason [to make an exception].”

    One reason parents want to be involved in the decision over their child’s vaccinations, Phillips notes, is because of the possibility of rare side effects, or of adverse reactions that could be triggered by asthma or egg allergies. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program paid out more than $202 million to parties claiming vaccine injuries in the government’s fiscal year 2014; claimants pointed to the flu vaccine in 1,527 injuries and 79 deaths, with 863 of those awarded compensation by the government, according to NVIC statistics. Because of that, Phillips notes, parents “should have the right to make an informed choice.”

    But in 2011, California passed a state law allowing minors 12 years and over to request and receive vaccines for Hepatitis B and HPV without parental consent; North Carolina has a similar law, and one has been proposed for New York.

    “It’s a big privacy issue. Parenting is very personal,” John Whitehead, founder of the civil liberties legal organization the Rutherford Institute, tells Yahoo Parenting. “Vaccines may be important, but a parent should at least be notified. Because if the government can stick needles in people without parental notice, at least, it would seem as though the state is taking over as parent.” 

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/mom-upset-after-son-receives-flu-vaccine-without-her-101351284757.html.
  • Why You Want to Avoid Hot Drinks When Flying

    Tea and Coffee in Flight Comes With Extras

    Early morning flights and traveling from west to east, when jet lag is tougher on your body,9 makes it more difficult to stay awake and function when you land. Sometimes all you want is a nice warm cup of coffee or tea to wake you up and help you feel refreshed.

    The featured video shows you why, before you ask the flight attendant to serve that coffee, you may want to wait until you land and are safely off the plane. According to a flight attendant, there is a self-imposed ban on warm beverages by flight crew. One attendant stated:10 “Flight attendants will not drink hot water on the plane. They will not drink plain coffee, and they will not drink plain tea.”

    Unfortunately, even cold drinks may be a problem as the attendants use tap water when the bottled water runs out. The same attendant confirmed that while the water tanks are cleaned, it isn’t very often.11 The tap water on your plane is first delivered to the airport via a water tanker truck where it is stored in a facility. Another truck is then filled from the storage tank and delivers the water to the plane. Tap water on your flight may be contaminated at any point during transport from the original source to your plane.

    This water has tested positive for coliform bacterial contamination, bacteria that indicate human fecal waste is present. Coliform bacteria are considered “indicator” bacteria, as they come from the same sources as pathogenic organisms like E. coli.12 Water supplies are tested for indicator bacteria since the concentrations of pathogens from fecal contamination may be small and the number of possible pathogens is large, making testing for each pathogen impractical. Testing for coliform bacteria is therefore more practical.

    Airlines Disinfect Water Tanks Every Three Months

    Over 15 years ago the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA13 (AFA) pushed for regulation of tap water on air flights. After an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study found 1 of every 8 planes in 158 tested had contaminated water,14 the airline industry agreed to a two-year plan during which they would test the water from each plane every year and disinfect the planes water tanks every three months.

    However, the tanks agreed to be disinfected in this accord were the plane’s tanks and not the storage or transportation tanks. Bacteria may infect the water on the plane from the storage tanks or from hoses that are routinely found in filthy condition.15

    Twelve airlines agreed to the initial solution in 2004 proposed by the EPA. Within a year the EPA went on to develop drinking water agreements with 24 domestic airlines.16 In the most recent round of testing released, the results showed Southwest had the best test results with less than 3 percent of its planes testing positive for coliform and none for E. coli.17

    The testing in 2004 by the EPA eventually led to the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule18 in 2009, after more testing continued to identify coliform contamination in aircraft tap water.19 Further study results, requested in 2012 by an investigation by NBC5 through a Freedom of Information Act Request, showed 12 percent of tests on commercial flights had at least one plane that tested positive for coliform bacteria.

    Bill Honker, director of the water division, EPA Region 6 in Dallas, calls this a “high percentage” of planes and believes the industry could do a better job of protecting their customers.20

    Think Twice About Your Water Sources

    The bacteria found in the planes’ water tanks may not all be killed at the temperatures used to brew tea and coffee on the plane, and in some instances the maximum brewing temperature is not reached.21 Southwest Airlines routinely uses ozone to disinfect their tanks and the faucets in the galley and lavatories, contributing to their low bacterial rates on testing.

    However disgusting it is that water from the plane’s tank may have coliform bacteria, the water originates from a source awash with fluoride, chloride and other pollutants. Drinking bottled water from plastic bottles has its own set of concerns, as it may contain bisphenol-a (BPA), an endocrine disrupting chemical linked to altered immune function, obesity, reduced sperm production and hyperactivity.22

    When water bottles are not stored in climate controlled environments, leakage of BPA into the water increases. If the plastic bottles are BPA-free, the chemical has likely been replaced with another form of bisphenol with a similar chemical structure and function.

    However, it is also important to be drinking while you fly. The air in the plane has little humidity. According to Aviation International News, a dripping wet terry cloth hand towel will be bone dry after 1.5 hours of flight,23 as the water is absorbed into the air quickly. The same happens to you as water evaporates more quickly from your skin and lungs in the low humidity, dehydrating you more quickly.

    Although plastic bottles of water have their health concerns, it’s a far safer choice than drinking tap water from the plane, and you do need to rehydrate while flying. If you are traveling for longer periods and are concerned the airline will run out of bottled water, you may carry on as many bottles as you like, as long as they are purchased after the security checkpoint.24

    Not Just US Planes

    Similar problems have been reported onboard Cathay Pacific Airways when Hong Kong’s Port Authority Office collected samples from 22 planes as part of a routine inspection and found 10 percent had tainted drinking water.25 Following the inspection, the airline issued a warning to passengers to avoid brushing their teeth in the lavatories and issued all passengers bottled water.

    This airline also cleans and disinfects its tanks every three months and tests every six months. Brenda Wiles manages a lab in Fort Worth, Texas, that is certified to test the drinking water from aircraft. She commented:26 “There’s poop in the water if there’s E. coli in the water, and that’s not a good thing. [Heating] might kill some of the organisms, the more susceptible ones, but it’s not going to kill the majority of them.”

    Filtration Is a Must for Clean, Pure Water

    According to a statement from the AFA, which first made the push to have water safety onboard planes regulated:27 “The regulation gives broad discretion to airlines on how often they must test the water and flush the tanks. AFA does not believe this regulation goes far enough or is sufficiently enforced.”

    It appears from this statement that the AFA is not satisfied with the regulations currently in place, or the attempts by the airlines to ensure the health and safety of the passengers and crew from water contamination. As with water from your tap at home, you may consider precautions that will help you avoid contamination from bacteria, toxic chemicals, drugs, fluoride and chlorine.

    To be certain you are using the purest water at home, consider filtering at both the point of entry to the house and the point of use. Unfiltered water may expose you to dangerous chlorine vapors and chloroform gas. A whole house filter helps eliminate the potential for vaporized chlorine from your toilets, washing machine and showers. Chloroform gas, chlorine vapors and the associated detergent byproducts may increase your risk of asthma, airway inflammation and respiratory allergies.

    If you don’t have a whole house filter, open your windows on opposing sides of your home to achieve cross ventilation for between five and 10 minutes each day to remove the gasses, no matter the temperature outside. Although purification is important, I also believe it’s important to drink living water. During my interview with Dr. Gerald Pollack, author of “The Fourth Phase of Water: Beyond Solid, Liquid, and Vapor,” we discussed “structured water,” which is the type of water found in your cells.

    This type of water is energized to recharge your mitochondria. You can find structured water from a deep spring, and the deeper and more pressurized the better. You can find a spring in your area using the website FindaSpring.com.28 Just be sure to evaluate the site you choose based on any surrounding industrial or agricultural facilities that may pollute the water.

    Two options you may try at home are vortexing or cooling the water to 39 degrees F. By creating a vortex in a glass of water by stirring it with a spoon, you’re putting more energy into it, thereby increasing the structure of the water. According to Pollack, virtually any energy put into the water seems to create or build structured water.

    This article originally appeared at: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/07/05/airplanes-tap-water-coliform-contamination.aspx.