Category: COVID Pandemic

  • STOP FUTURE MASKS MANDATES IN IDAHO H493

    HFI SUPPORTS THIS BILL
    H 493 Mask mandates, prohibition Rep. Gallagher

    Feb 14 this bill passed the Committee Unanimously Approved to be heard on the House Floor!

    Now it moves to the Senate State Affairs Committee

    JGuthrie@senate.idaho.gov, TBernt@senate.idaho.gov, CWinder@senate.idaho.gov, KAnthon@senate.idaho.gov, MHarris@senate.idaho.gov, ALee@senate.idaho.gov, BToews@senate.idaho.gov, MWintrow@senate.idaho.gov, JRuchti@senate.idaho.gov

    Last year a similar bill passed the House but died before it got a vote in Senate. The bill was introduced again this year and it prohibits the state government and any of its political subdivisions from mandating the use of a face mask, face shield, or other face covering to prevent the spread of disease even in the state of emergency. Political subdivisions include county and city governments, school districts, and public health districts, but does not include hospitals or health care facilities.


    “The government doesn’t have the right to tell the people how to care for their bodies during times of sickness or health because the government doesn’t have rights, the people do.
    When it comes to requiring masks the government must be constrained from infringing on people’s natural rights like it did during the Covid debacle.”

    Miste Karlfeldt

    Government was instituted to protect the inherent rights of the people. Those rights include how people choose to care for themselves. Illness and risk are part of life. Each person is responsible for deciding how to handle them. The government has no authority over our health decisions. Each person is sovereign, with bodily autonomy. Forcing a medical procedure or medical device on a person is a violation of their autonomy and inherent right of self-determination. Masks are dangerous and ineffective at preventing the spread of disease. But regardless of efficacy, forcing them on the people is tyrannical and a completely unacceptable overreach.

    Sarah Clendenon

    We remember the mask mandates which recently blanketed our cities and counties, many which carried the possibility of fines and imprisonment. We remember when the city of Moscow arrested three Christians peacefully singing psalms outside without masks, and when two men were arrested in Ada County for allegedly failing to appear in court when they would not mask up while trying to perform their duty of entering the courthouse. We remember witnessing a litany of abuses of power on a shocking scale with our own eyes, and we will not return to sleep.

    Not only did the mandates constitute a basic violation of individual liberty, but citizens were justified in feeling insulted as well. The CDC which we were told to blindly obey has waffled on the effectiveness of masks. It is very easy to get mechanistic studies to say whatever one wants by failing to control for any one of hundreds of variables; however, randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of effectiveness research, clearly indicate that masking doesn’t work. Evidence on a policy scale also shows that mandates don’t work.

    The fact that mandates tended to allow masks of very low quality raises questions as to what the actual goal was. The required “coverings” undoubtedly resulted in a moist petri dish on one’s face, with the expected consequences. The emotional toll it took on children should have been a consideration along with the impact on their mental health and social development. Avoiding the many cognitive and health issues associated with cortisol levels increased by mask-induced mouth-breathing should also have been considered. The list of severe concerns goes on. Keeping in mind the utter confusion of the whole ordeal, it is understandable that many wondered if this effort to occlude the human face was not below the surface a more fundamental attempt to obscure the image of God with which we were made, and the requirement to blindly obey not a precursor to something worse.

    Overall, no matter the rationale of various mandates, I have already been given ample evidence not to put too much trust in government, and I also believe that those coercive policies are outside the valid role of government. House Bill 493 responds to this reality by prohibiting government entities from mandating masks, with the exception of vocations where it is already integral to wear them. Local jurisdictions retain all powers that would not infringe on the individual’s rights. This legislation has my full support.

    Ben Toews Idaho State Senator District 4

    TALKING POINTS:

    **1. Effectiveness of Surgical Masks:**

    The efficacy of surgical masks remains inconclusive despite widespread belief in their effectiveness. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have struggled to provide definitive conclusions, with cumulative reviews highlighting the limitations of available evidence

    **2. Hazards of Wearing a Mask:**

    Wearing masks may inadvertently create conducive environments for the proliferation of pathogens, as increased sweating around the mouth can encourage bacterial survival. Additionally, prolonged mask-wearing, especially among children, poses risks to respiratory health, including discomfort, skin irritation, and breathing difficulties.

    **3. Psychological and Societal Impacts:**
    The psychological and societal impacts of prolonged mask use cannot be overlooked. Studies suggest that extended mask-wearing can lead to mental fatigue, decreased cognitive performance, and heightened psychological distress, particularly among vulnerable populations. The imposition of mask mandates may exacerbate existing disparities and contribute to societal tension.

    **4. Ethical Considerations:**

    Mandating universal mask use raises ethical concerns regarding personal liberties and autonomy. Individuals should retain the right to make informed decisions about their health without undue government intervention. Mandates that infringe upon personal freedoms without clear evidence of benefit risk undermining trust in governmental authority and eroding social cohesion and trust in the government.

    The imposition of blanket mandates without due consideration of their limitations and potential drawbacks raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Alternative strategies, such as mask recommendations and targeted interventions, should be explored to strike a balance between public health imperatives and individual rights.

    The impact of mandating universal mask use stretches beyond mere inconvenience—it delves deep into our fundamental rights and the very essence of our humanity.

    Imagine a world where children, innocent and impressionable, are born into a reality where faces are hidden behind layers of fabric. For these little ones, learning the subtleties of social interaction becomes a daunting challenge. Their tiny minds, eager to absorb the world around them, are met with a barrier—literal and metaphorical—hindering their ability to connect, communicate, and comprehend.

    Now the tender age of four, these children struggle, stifled by masks that obscure smiles, muffle laughter, and dampen the warmth of human connection. The very fabric of their social development is frayed, as they grapple with the frustration of deciphering emotions through a veil of uncertainty.

    Concerns about long-term adverse effects of wearing masks and being surrounded by individuals in masks and its impact on children’s development warrant careful consideration.

    CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT

    Long-term mask-wearing can hinder language development, particularly among young children who rely heavily on visual cues for language acquisition. 

    • Masks obscure facial expressions and mouth movements, making it challenging for children to learn and understand speech. This impediment to clear communication may have lasting effects on language development and interpersonal skills.
    • Social Cues and Interaction: Masks obscure facial expressions, making it difficult to interpret social cues and emotions during interactions. This can lead to misunderstandings, miscommunication, and decreased social connection.
      • Prolonged exposure to masked individuals may result in diminished social skills and increased feelings of isolation, particularly among children and adolescents who are still developing social competencies.4

    But the impact doesn’t stop there. For every child forced to navigate a world where facial expressions are shrouded, a parent is agonizing over the implications. Will their child’s speech development suffer? Will they grow up lacking the essential skills to navigate the complexities of human interaction? The weight of these questions hangs heavy, as families grapple with the unforeseen consequences of mandated mask-wearing.

    And let’s not forget the toll on our collective psyche. Beyond the physical discomfort and respiratory hazards lies a deeper, more insidious threat—the erosion of trust, both in our institutions and in each other. Mandates imposed without due consideration for individual liberties sow seeds of discontent, breeding resentment and suspicion where trust once flourished.

    At its core, the debate over mask mandates transcends mere policy—it’s a battle for our autonomy, our freedom to make choices that shape our lives. We must tread carefully, mindful of the ethical implications that accompany such sweeping measures.

    For in our quest to safeguard public health, we must not sacrifice the very principles upon which our society is built—freedom, autonomy, and the unyielding belief in the inherent dignity of every individual.

  • Embracing Freedom in the Face of Mask Mandates

    2023, just before another election year, rumors are flying that mask mandates will be implemented in the near future. This means that parents will be forced again to submit religious exemptions to mask mandates for children. In these trying times, parents find themselves once more standing up for their cherished rights and liberties, particularly in the context of mask mandates for their children. It’s a rallying cry for freedom, a reminder that parents, not institutions, should have the final say in raising their kids. These new mask mandates are being rolled out again. We want to empower you as an individual and a parent to stand your ground confidently and respectfully.

    https://youtu.be/bwaf8f2NMrQ

    MASK MANDATES AT SCHOOLS

    One mom’s response to masking mandates and submitting a religious exemption was, “Child abuse is against my religion!”

    Her words echo the sentiments of countless parents who firmly hold that subjecting their children to masks is akin to causing harm. It’s not just about physical well-being; it’s about the mental and emotional toll that masks can exact on our children. Depriving them of the simple joy of seeing smiles and freely breathing can stifle their growth and happiness.

    Do we know that masks are harmful to the health and well-being of our children?

    The research says yes.

    Do they create fear?

    Yes. 

    Looking for the research? There is a plethora found in this drive.

    At the core of this issue is the belief that parents are answerable to a higher power—God—for the way they nurture their children. The facts are clear: the risks posed to children by the pandemic are relatively low. So, why should parents be coerced into accepting mask mandates they feel are unnecessary and even harmful to their little ones?

    But it’s essential to remember that these concerns are rooted in sincere convictions. Parents who assert religious objections to mask mandates genuinely believe these mandates are detrimental to their children’s health and well-being. They see masks as instruments of fear and tools to enforce what they perceive as “unlawful and unjust rules.” In our eyes, it’s not just about protecting our kids; it’s about preserving the inalienable right to parent as we believe God intended.

    This is a matter of personal conscience. A firmly held moral belief that your children are a gift from God and that he grants you wisdom and authority to raise them as he directs your heart.

    Religious Exemption for Mask To wear a mask on my face goes against God and my religious beliefs.

    As a Christian, I view the mask as an affront to what I know to be true in the Word of God.

    We know that wearing a mask is part of a satanic ritual, a humiliation ritual, which the God of the Bible says we are to abstain from engaging in rituals. Eph 5:11 “..Take no part in unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”

    Gen 1:27, Gen 9:26, and Col 3:10 says that I am made in the image and likeness of God. As Job 33:4 states perfectly, “The Spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.” I will not hide the image of God nor hinder the breath of life which is my very connection to my creator.

    The command from God to “fear not” is written hundreds of times in the Bible. Our generous Abba, Father has given us a reminder for every day of the year to “fear not” because He wants us to look to Him, not the world, for our protection and provision.

    2 Timothy 1:7 “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” From this scripture, we see that a sound mind cannot exist with the spirit of fear. In fact, the spirit of fear makes us slaves according to Romans 8:15 “So you have not received a spirit that makes you fearful slaves. Instead, you received God’s Spirit when he adopted you as his own children. Now we call him, “Abba, Father.”

    The good news is in 1 John 4:18 “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love.” We know that God is love so there is no fear in God which leads to the understanding that the spirit of fear will separate me from God and His perfect love. Not trusting in God is an abomination to God.

    Heb 11:6 “And without faith, it is impossible to please Him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who seek Him.” 1 Cor 2:5 “That your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God. I have faith that I am made perfectly by my creator with a perfectly designed immune system as God saw that His creation was good in Gen 1:3. Romans 1:17 says that the righteous live by faith and Mark 10:52 says that we can experience healing through faith. Therefore, my faith is in the one true creator God not the shifting direction of Dr Fauci and is 1 mask, 2 mask, goggles, distancing, and gloves. My religious liberty is my birthright and is supported by the Constitution.

    printable-mask-religious-exemptionDownload

  • NFLPA urged to protect the health and well-being of NFL players

    The NFLPA has long been committed to protecting the health and safety of the players it represents, particularly in relation to the risk of traumatic brain injury and concussions.  Health Freedom Defense Fund has urged the National Football League Players’ Association to focus on a new health concern that could affect NFL players’ long-term health and safety. The call comes in the wake of recent tragic events, including Damar Hamlin’s multiple cardiac arrests and the heart attacks and strokes of former NFL players Uche Nwaneri, Chris Baker, and Jessie Lemonier. A growing body of scientific literature suggests that COVID-19 vaccines could be a contributing factor.

    Read more at Health Freedom Defense fund

  • COVID Long Haulers Resources

    We have gathered some resources for those still struggling with COVID long haulers and those struggling with the after-effects of the shots.

    Five Doctors Meet for Roundtable Discussion on Medical Truth

    Viral Protocols with Dr. Michael Karlfeldt (ck.page)

    https://chipper-author-2689.ck.page/d7f22c782f

    LONG HAULERS SYNDROME

    For some individuals, the after-effects of the virus are creating complex illnesses to treat. Long Term effects from viral infections have been documented to include an achy body, pain, brain fog, chronic cough, shortness of breath, and plantation affecting the organs, heart, brain, lungs, and lessening degree, the kidneys. In his 30 years of clinical experience treating chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia (CFS/FMS), and in his landmark published research on CFS/FMS (published in the Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome), Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum has found that his S.H.I.N.E.® approach is successful in the vast majority of patients. Dr. Teitelbaum, a board-certified internist and nationally known expert in treating complex illnesses, including chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, sleep, and pain, believes with some common sense, we will do fine as a nation. 

    In this episode, learn some encouraging facts:

    • Dr. Teitelbaum’s immunity-boosting protocols, including Zinc, VIT A, D, C, K 
    • His secret to reducing stress: hint it involves reducing/eliminating media
    • Fascinating Biological Facts that differentiate men and women’s response to the virus
    • Pain is not an outside invader. It’s a regular alert system – a warning. When you give your body what it needs, the pain goes away.   
    • The unresolved concerns about the vaccine: 

                   * Virus mutations and the effectiveness of the vaccine

                   * The vaccine and your immune system response – a competitive inhibitor. 

    • The program was developed by Dr. Teitelbaum for viral infections dealing with chronic fatigue and those still dealing with long-hauler symptoms.

    Here’s an additional list of resources with interviews from Doctors worldwide:

    Use of Hyperbaric Treatments for COVID Symptoms

    Reversing the Damage from the Shot

    Reversing Cell Damage from the mRNA shot

    On this episode of Health made radio Dr. Michael Karlfeldt interviews Dr. Neisuma, Ph.D. in toxicology, who has 30 years of experience in human exposure to drugs, chemicals, and microbes. He describes the vicious cycle that pharmaceuticals and their side effects pull an individual further and further away from controlling their own health and wellness. In this episode, Dr. Nieusma describes how the MRNA “vaccine” impacts cellular function and how to reverse the damage.

    https://www.brighteon.com/6b4587a8-31cc-4060-900c-afd5a051c3b0

    Keeping Us Living in Fear to Sell COVID Vaccine

    COVID19 Death Estimates

    Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until January 11, 2023.26 To justify keeping us living in fear, 27 28 federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at the same time.29 30  One high-ranking government doctor said with a straight face – “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.” 31

    But Americans have grown weary of virus porn, and while the majority of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just 14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.32 33 34 There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to get a COVID shot every single year. 35 36 37 38 In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021 and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years to come.39 40 41 42 

    A Weirdly Mutated Virus, A Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine

    Those two drug companies are selling a cell-disrupter biological product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that has ever infected humans. The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44 But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind of damage it – or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA product – are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53

    Heart_Blood Clots

    The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects, especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.54 55 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot”,56 57 even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported online,58 59 60 61 62 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).64 65  There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain, and immune system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67 

    The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.

    Embalmer Richard Hirschman – Strange Blood Clots

  • Are we still in a free country?

    In Idaho, a man sits in jail for six months for a peaceful 10-minute protest on a sidewalk in daylight. #FREEROBERTJONES

    He was wrongfully arrested for Disturbing the Peace (1A-protected political protest) on -11-2021; Trial and Sentencing on 9-15-2022

    Robert Jones, a good, selfless, and humble man and a true Patriot, was sentenced to 6 months in jail for exercising his First Amendment Rights by peacefully protesting on a public sidewalk in Boise. This is so disgusting and it’s happening right here in OUR Idahome.

    -Eva

    SUPPORT ROBERT and our first amendment rights!

    Support Robert! We hope he will be freed of his six-month sentence (for a 10-minute protest!) in time for Christmas so he can return home with his family.

    Join us as we sit in the courtroom for the hearings this week: Dec 19 and 23, both at 2:30, Ada County Courthouse, Boise. We want more eyes on the judge and the court proceedings.

    Stand against injustice by our Judicial system. Financially support his family: givesendgo.com/G6J75

    The Background of the Story

    On September 15, Robert Jones was found guilty of disturbing the peace after a jury of six ignored the fact that the elements of the alleged crime had not been proven during deliberations. The jury even returned to the courtroom to ask the judge how to proceed as it was clear they lacked the evidence that the jury instructions told him they needed in order to convict.

    Judge Susan Clark should have been fully aware that the jury lacked the necessary evidence to convict. Nonetheless, in defiance of law, reason, and logic, they found Robert guilty.

    Judge Clark proceeded to sentence him. When Robert said that he would not consent to probation which included a Thinking Errors Class. Judge Clark responded by sentencing Robert to a maximum of six months in jail, which was the unjust conclusion to Roberts’s trial.

    DENIED THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL.

    Sentencing took place one year and nine months after his arrest, an unreasonably long period during which Robert was often denied access to the courts. His crime? Protesting. Because of a lack of access to the government, he protested on a public sidewalk. It was during daylight hours, exactly two years ago, and it lasted no more than 10 minutes.

    It seems that his right to a speedy trial, his right to access the courts, and his first amendment protected right to political protest were all violated.

    As of December 16, 2022, Robert will have served three months in Ada county jail. He was wrongly convicted and harshly sentenced. Because prisoners in Ada county jail are no longer allowed to receive visitors, Robert has seen his wife and family only by way of video calls.

    UPDATE FOR Monday, December 12

    Robert appeared in court in person so that judge Susan Clark could hear and rule on the motion for reconsideration of sentence. It was a kangaroo court.

    Follow up on the Robert Jones hearing today. The courtroom was packed–67 people came to support Robert. ❤ This was the hearing for Reconsideration of the Sentence, meaning there was a chance he would be released from his sentence and sent home today. That did not happen. And once again, justice did not happen.

    A little background: on Friday, very late in the day, the prosecution filed an Opposition to the motion, to which Robert’s lawyer responded with a memorandum last night. Today Judge Clark explained, in keeping with the prosecution’s complaint, that the motion was unclear. She somehow didn’t understand what it was Robert wanted. Well, Robert’s sentence consists of court fees and six months in jail. That’s it.

    The man is sitting in front of her, in shackles and jail clothes, and he is asking for Reconsideration of his Sentence under Idaho Criminal Rule 35, and the judge has received 25 affidavits from friends asking her to release him from jail, and she couldn’t figure out what he wants?
    No, she couldn’t.

    She’d rather appear incompetent than have to reject him in front of all those people. Well done, you guys. ❤️🙏

    Facebook comment

    Secondly, Robert was very bummed this evening. Very.

    But he was also so very appreciative to see so many faces of people come to support him–both familiar faces and new ones.

    He wants everyone to know that your standing with him matters. It brings more attention to the thing he is standing for–liberty. And furthermore, I think he was just really touched by all the support.

    When he was first brought into the courtroom, there weren’t many people in there. He had NO IDEA that we were out in the hall, and when we were finally allowed to come in, he was blown away. But he also wasn’t allowed to turn around and look at us. When they finally took him out again through the side door, and we all shouted, “We love you, Robert,” and applauded, he wished he had said more or had time to say more. But those officers are quick. Still, we could see the gratitude all over his face.

    It was suggested by the judge that this matter be revisited at Robert’s other hearing, which is already scheduled for Monday, December 19, at 2:30 (that’s to hear the Motion for Request of Stay of Sentence Pending Appeal). But that didn’t work for the prosecutor, who apparently likes to respond to things at the last possible moment and push out other people’s hearings as far as possible.

    Therefore, the matter of Robert’s request for Reconsideration of Sentence will now be heard on Friday, December 23, at 2:30.PLEASE COME TO BOTH upcoming hearings!!!

    First of all, it is possible that Judge Susan Clark found it difficult to reject Robert’s request outright with so many eyes on her today and that she thought she would kick it down the road to another day when fewer eyes would be on her. We need EYES ON HER!

    What else can you do?

    Call the ACLU on Robert’s behalf?”

    ACLU could potentially:
    1. File an amicus brief to help Robert’s case;
    2. Represent Robert in suing the bad actors in government who wrongly arrested, prosecuted, denied access to the courthouse, etc.;
    3. Provide support to Robert’s lawyer;
    4. Ask for an injunction for relief of punishment should Judge Clark deny Robert’s request for a stay of sentence next week;
    5. Lend their name and clout to a case that deserves attention because Roberts’s First Amendment Right to political protest was denied repeatedly! Wrongfully arrested, wrongfully convicted, wrongfully imprisoned!

    Please support Robert and the cause of Freedom, including our 1st and 2nd Amendment Rights.

    Monday, December 19, at 2:30 (that’s to hear the Motion for Request of Stay of Sentence Pending Appeal) and Friday, Dec 23, both at 2:30, Ada County Courthouse, Boise.

    Update provided by Susan. She’s keeping us updated via social channels. You can search the hashtag to find her posts:

    FB: “#FreeRobertJones”

    TG: “Free Robert Now!”

  • Non-Compliance

    I recently saw a sign hanging from an overpass that said, “We can’t comply ourselves out of tyranny.” Sadly, in an effort to keep from rocking the boat, many of us toe the line even when we know it’s a violation of our constitutional rights. It is a pervasive idea among the American (and global) population that “simple” compliance with authority will yield the best results. People think that if they follow mandates issued by the government, eventually, their lives will return to normal. This may be true in some regard, but you cannot comply your way out of tyranny– and that compliance will only give greater power to those in control.

    Even if your life returns to what it was before the pandemic (which there is little evidence to show that will happen, even after more than two years of compliance), the thick stench of tyranny does not wash away. Your life may eventually return to “normal,” but not because of a voluntary community effort, but because those you’ve given the power to allow it to return to normal. There’s a chance you may get the results you seek through compliance, but the tyranny remains.

    https://www.libertariancountry.com/blogs/news/you-cannot-comply-your-way-out-of-tyranny

    Non Compliance with our Churches

    This past Friday, Sean Feucht  of Let Us Worship spoke to a group of thousands of Idahoan Christians about the fact that local churches shuttered their doors out of fear. He challenged our church leaders to stand up and, next time, take the lead to honor God above the government.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZQb5zSqq1A&ab_channel=SeanFeucht

    Think of what life would be like now had more churches, businesses, and individuals stood up to the tyranny. We The People, are the authority; we don’t have to submit to tyranny. Many churches deferred to the “authorities” because of Romans 13, but they fail to understand that our government at its essence, is vastly different from the Roman empire in that WE are the authority. The 501c3 entanglement further compromises the institutionalized church.

    Victory for Mike McClure, Non-Compliant Pastor in California

    Two Years Ago, Pastor Mike McClure, from Calvary Chapel San Jose remained open in defiance of orders from San Jose. He faced $1,200,000 in mounting fines. He won’t budge. Most “pastors” and Churches have turned their back on him. Still, he did not comply and accepted no deals. He risked it all. The California Court of Appeal finds “public health” orders forcing church closure are UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Read more about the case: https://www.calvarychapelmagazine.org/word-press/church-held-in-contempt-update/

    Non Compliance at the Workplace

    Our inalienable rights have been trampled over the past two years. It didn’t start then; however, it came to a head in March 2020 when the Governor announced that this pandemic wouldn’t be over nor would normally return until people were vaccinated. Keep in Mind this was before the development of the vaccine started! *Governors across the United States were given the same script.

    As an organization, we challenge citizens to challenge our elected officials and unelected leaders to stand up and honor the Constitution. I am proud to say that many who knew better threw off the chains of apathy and took a stand against unconstitutional mandates.

    Many individuals did so to the point of losing their livelihoods. Our website and social media channels experienced EXTREME censorship. But, we continued to press on. We protested at the Capitol, at the Central Health District (while snipers pointed weapons at women and children). We stood with nurses, doctors, and hospital employees who knew better than the average citizen how to read the science and challenged the lack of scientific data backing the mandates.

    Sentenced to 5 days jail for protesting on a public sidewalk in the middle of the day for 12 minutes

    Non Compliance with Boise’s Mandates

    Mask mandates were among the most controversial issues in Idaho in 2020, but that chapter of state history has come to an end with Boise Mayor Lauren McLean eliminating the city’s mask mandate and gathering limit on May 14, 2021.

    Boise was among the last of the local governments in Idaho – a total of nine counties and 10 cities – with a mask mandate in place. In Boise, disobeying the mask mandate in any public area, including parks and trails, was considered a misdemeanor crime, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.

    Susan was ordered jail time for protesting this mandate.

    They have set the precedents to close us down and lock us up when we don’t comply with the tyrannical mandates and restrictions.

    What have we learned?

    What have we taught our children?

    What needs to change?

    Are you willing to make the sacrifice to keep your children and grandchildren from living under tyranny?

  • CDC Updates Guidelines Data Shows No Clear Benefit of Vaccination

    On August 12, 2022, CDC updated its guidelines. To the surprise of all, vaccinated and unvaccinated will be treated the same. There are no additional restrictions in place for those unwilling to subject their bodies to experimental medical products. Now, two years later, after unconstitutional medical mandates that left hundreds of thousands fired – the data reflects the fact that their experimental vaccine DOES NOT impact the death rate from the sickness.

    Almost a quarter of a million individuals suffered life-threatening, long-term, or permanent reactions from experimental and liablity-free vaccinations. More than a million reports were submitted to the national database that tracks vaccine reactions.

    COVID-19 death rates are nearly the same in all age groups reported whether or not a person is vaccinated. It would be difficult for the CDC to have different guidelines based on vaccination status since the data show no clear benefit of vaccinations.

    View the charts and data on Children’s Health Defense.
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-streamline-covid-guidance-disrupt-daily-lives/

    childrenshealthdefense.org

  • OPT-OUT OF VACCINE TRACKING

    IRIS is Idaho’s Immunization Tracking system. Your family is AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED into the system by authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Is this a gross violation of privacy?

    Your children’s medical information is likely in the government’s database RIGHT NOW! You must OPT OUT to have your information removed from the IRIS database.

    Once your information is shared within the government tracking database, authorized 3rd parties can take the information and use it as they wish.

    OPT-OUT HERE: https://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/iris-opt-out

    While you can opt out of IRIS and purge your child’s information from their IRIS system, you are unable to purge it from the third-party systems once it has been accessed. 

    IDAHO HEALTH AND WELFARE OPT-OUT PAGE

    per the IDAHO HEALTH AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE: http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/IDImmunizationProgram/ImmunizationRegistryIRIS/IRISOptOut/tabid/3812/Default.aspx

    Idaho’s Immunization Reminder Information System (IRIS) is a secure health information system containing the names and immunization history of people who have received vaccinations in Idaho. This information is available only to authorized health care providers, child care providers, and schools. Participation in IRIS is voluntary, and you may opt-out at any time by contacting the Idaho Immunization Program at (208)334-5931 and requesting an opt-out form or by completing this online opt-out form. 

    Two options are available for opting out of IRIS for yourself, your minor child (under the age of 18 years), or a person for whom you are a legal guardian:  

    • Option 1:  Remove only immunization-related information from IRIS. Only demographic information is retained in IRIS, including name, address, phone number, mother’s maiden name, date of birth, and gender. Demographic information will not be viewable by medical providers, schools or childcare staff. By making this selection, I understand that allowing demographic information to be retained in IRIS will reduce the chance of accidental or intentional re-entry of vaccination information about me/him/her.
    • Option 2: Remove all information from IRIS – immunization and demographic. By making this selection, I understand that at any time, information regarding myself, my child, or person for whom I am a legal guardian, may be re-entered by a health care provider. I understand that I must work with my health care provider(s) to ensure this information is not re-entered into IRIS. 

    CLICK HERE to have your private medical information removed from IRIS. 

    Do you think our tracking system should be something you can OPT into if you wish rather than being forced in? It’s time to let our legislators know we want them to make this change! 

    CLICK HERE TO Find your Legislators and Send them a brief message:

    IRIS tracking system is NOT voluntary as an OPT OUT system. It is a gross violation of privacy. Please support legislation that changes the Health Department’s vaccine tracking system to an OPT IN by choice system. 

    2017 Legislative Session, they attempted to expand the tracking to include Adults. The bill was HB 91.https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2017/legislation/H0091/
    It FAILED to pass into law.

    ________________________

    The following representatives voted against the automatic tracking of adults into the IRIS system. Contact these Representatives and thank them for protecting their privacy and ask them to sponsor a bill that removes the automatic entry of our children’s information. 

     Anderst, Armstrong, Barbieri, Blanksma, Boyle, Burtenshaw, Chaney, Cheatham, Clow, Collins, Crane, Dayley, DeMordaunt, Dixon, Gannon, Gestrin, Giddings, Hanks, Harris, Hartgen, Holtzclaw, Jordan, Kerby, Kingsley(Lohman), Luker, Manwaring, McDonald, Mendive, Monks, Moon, Moyle, Nate, Palmer, Scott, Shepherd, Stevenson, Syme, Thompson, Troy, Trujillo, Vander Woude, Youngblood, Zito, Zollinger

  • What does this mean for our 1st Amendment Rights in Idaho?

    Susan Lang was found guilty of disturbing the peace for protesting Covid lockdowns. What does this mean for our 1st Amendment rights? Miste Karlfeldt of Health Freedom Idaho interviews Susan and discusses the upcoming sentencing on August 17, 2021

  • Health Freedom and What We Do Not Need…

    Idaho! Do you want to know why we did NOT need the federalism committee, and why we don’t need bills to protect us from Biden’s unconstitutional mandate?

    Several reasons!!
    _______________________________________________

    ➡️ The 9th and 10th amendments of the US Constitution.

    ➡️ The Idaho Constitution

    ➡️ Idaho Code 39-9002 and our state’s public policy statement in 39-9003.

    The above-referenced laws and sections of code are set up perfectly for our state to simply say NO.
    ____________________________________________________

    WANT TO KNOW WHAT IDAHO *DOES* NEED??

    A GOVERNOR AND AG WITH THE COURAGE, WILLINGNESS, AND HEART TO STAND ON IDAHO SOVEREIGNTY, AND LEGISLATORS WILLING TO TELL IACI TO GO AWAY!!!!!!
    ___________________________________________________

    TITLE 39
    CHAPTER 90

    IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT

    39-9003. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY. (1) The power to require or regulate a person’s choice in the mode of securing health care services, or to impose a penalty related thereto, is not found in the Constitution of the United States of America, and is, therefore, a power reserved to the people pursuant to the Ninth Amendment, and to the several states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The state of Idaho hereby exercises its sovereign power to declare the public policy of the state of Idaho regarding the right of all persons residing in the state of Idaho in choosing the mode of securing health care services free from the imposition of penalties, or the threat thereof, by the federal government of the United States of America relating thereto.

    (2) It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America.