Is a mask similar to wearing a bike helmet? I am seeing way too many analogies from pro-mask parents, saying that they are just like bike helmets, seat belts or steel-capped boots. This is nonsense. Let’s talk about the medical aspects of mask-wearing, not the peripheral aspects of social distancing, isolation, etc.
If you wear a surgical mask or a homemade mask of cotton …, especially in an enclosed space with other people, like a classroom or bus, this is what happens:
1) the air heats up and humidity rises. The mask rapidly becomes moist with your breath and as a result, the viruses, bacteria, and fungi which accumulate on the outside have a nice culture medium to grow in, and which can be breathed in, as you force air through the moist mess.
2) Constantly touching, or shifting the mask to attend to itches, or general discomfort contaminates the mask with anything on your fingers.
3) you start rebreathing your own carbon dioxide, which results in making your blood acidic. This can result in kidney dysfunction among a long list of other health issues well-proven and discussed in the medical literature.
4) your intake of oxygen is reduced and your brain doesn’t function as it should. These factors have been extensively discussed in the medical literature because those effects are even seen in the theatre when surgeons wear surgical masks, which cannot stop viruses but are principally there to prevent surgeons from splashes of blood from the patient and putting any droplet onto the patient. Because this is an issue in theatres, for both nurses and doctors when surgeons and nurses wear masks, this is what OSH has set up.
a) extra oxygen must be pumped INTO theatre to compensate for the oxygen decrease in breathing
b) the air pressure in theatre is negative which means that while oxygen is being pumped INTO theatre, the air in the theatre is pumped OUT of the room so that no air recirculates which keeps the air clean, so generally, air is pumped in from underneath and sucked out through the ceiling.
c) The humidity is also kept very low so that the surgeons can stay as sweat-free as possible, and the mask lasts longer.
d) Temperature is low and controlled.
e) because of breath moisture getting trapped in the fabric, the minute a mask becomes damp, that results in any virus or bacteria being trapped there, and becoming a Petrie dish.
It’s inevitable that breathing in through fabric will force some of that accumulating moisture with multiplying bacteria, fungi, viruses, etc, into your mouth resulting in infection, THEREFORE in theatre, the MINUTE a mask becomes even slightly moist, it is changed out and a new dry one put on. So a surgeon can go through a lot of masks during one operation. And if you are wondering why surgeons emerge from theatre and the first thing they do is rip the mask off, it’s because the very act of wearing a mask is incredibly tiring.
Surgeons hate wearing them, not for any of the above reasons, but because you end up touching your face to relieve the tickles and itches, or adjusting them because they are not comfortable. Masks are a distraction and a thought impediment…
Nowhere do I see any suggestions that buses, classrooms, or other enclosed spaces should be subject to the OSH regulations designed to keep surgeons safe. So essentially they are saying that children can do what surgeons can’t and that in an uncontrolled environment, masks are perfectly safe. Masks are not safe, and it’s also ludicrous to expect children to observe the sorts of hygiene requirements that surgeons have been trained to adhere to. And we aren’t even talking about the fact that cloth masks and surgical masks don’t stop infection – which is the government message of masking up. As far as I know, none of the above apply to bike helmets, car seat belts or steel-capped boots.
None of those things is an irritant, and neither do they change, in ANY way, the biochemical balance in the body or have the potential to result in serious staph skin infections, and an increase in respiratory pathogens as a result of breathing through the developing Petrie dish in front of your face. Masks have the potential to create serious issues for adults and children. Next time you go to buy that $52.00 box of masks make sure you read the warning on the side of the box that says that these masks cannot protect you from covid. And please rethink these faulty analogies, because it’s vital that people understand the facts so that they can avoid cognitive assumptions and biases.
On September 1st, 2021, I am being forced on a 28-day unpaid suspension, and ultimately, I will be terminated on October 28th due to the hospital’s decision to force experimental vaccines without any long-term testing on all staff, volunteers, and vendors in the healthcare system.
In 30 days, I will be forced to walk away from the profession I have given my life and my heart to for the last ten years. I’m walking away from the only “big girl” job I’ve ever known. I’m walking away from my pharmacy tech position to which I have sacrificed years of my life. Sleeping at the hospital, continuing education, extra hours worked. I’ll never get any of that back.
I’m walking away because I refuse to allow someone to put something that I don’t want into my body, not through bribery, force, or coercion.
I’m walking away because it’s what’s best for myself and my family. I’m walking away because “healthcare” has become a discriminatory, ugly beast.
I didn’t sign up for this. The healthcare I began my career in was night and day different than this. We were blind to choices made by our patients that brought them to us.
We are not God, judge, or jury. We are healing hands.
I will walk away because it’s a lesson my child needs to see.
That his momma gave it her all and still lost. AND THAT ITS OK TO LOSE. He will see what mountains one voice can shake. He will see those mountains move with lots of voices. He will see those mountains crumble with an army of voices. He will learn; his singular voice is capable of amazing things.
I will walk away with my head held high. I will own this with resolve to move forward. Although my life and heart have been given back in pieces, I will gather those pieces and walk away. I’ll put those pieces together and create something new.
I’ll rely on the friends I have made in this fight. I’ll rely on my family for the days when the fight seems to be too great. But I will walk away knowing I have an army of people behind me.
I will walk away. I will do it on my terms. Head held high. Full of pride for giving my all to this fight. Full of pride because I will always tell my son I STOOD UP FOR WHAT WAS RIGHT FOR ME.
One of many stories from our healthcare heroes who are being denied informed consent and bodily autonomy by the very industry that should have those concepts held in the highest regard. These words are taken from a public post on facebook. These healthcare workers can see that with only 1% of the damages reported there is a risk that can cause permanent damage. A job is temporary. Death is permanent. Disability is permanent. Where there is risk there must be a choice.
Health Freedom Idaho is sponsoring an historic bipartite event on the morning of September 11th at Candlelight Christian Fellowship in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho. Following a moment of silence and prayer led by Pastor Tim Remington in remembrance of the 20th anniversary of the attack on the Twin Towers, a panel discussion will ensue between state and local leaders regarding the grave potential for Covid-19 vaccine mandates, and the intersection of various Constitutional, God-given, business and other rights that these mandates either infringe upon or enforce. The panel discussion will be followed by a Town Hall style Q&A session- engaging the citizens’ voices, which have largely been ignored.
The Covid-19 pandemic and executive health department imposed lockdowns, coupled with ever-expanding mandates have summarily expunged American citizens’ rights and responsibilities to take an active role in their own governance. For 18 months, a litany of rights- Constitutional rights; God-given rights; business rights; and purported community rights to be free from illness- have been placed at intersecting odds with one another.
Health Freedom Idaho is setting the record straight. Join us.
Date: Saturday, September 11th, 2021
Location: Candlelight Christian Fellowship 5725 N Pioneer Dr, Coeur D Alene, ID 83815
Time:
Panel Discussion 09:00 am to 10:30 am
Intermission 10:30 am to 11:00 pm
Citizen Town Hall Q&A 11:00 pm to 12:00 pm
For questions or comments, please call or text the Health Freedom North Idaho hotline: 208-956-0721
This is a response to a recent Health District Board Meeting by a local Idahoan:
Thank you, Mr Labrador, for addressing the issue with the CDC making baseless, anti-science recommendations. The CDC has lost a great deal of respect over this issue. It is wise to not follow suit. However, while addressing this issue Mr. Ladrador also uses CDC proclamations to make a point that the unvaccinated are responsible for hospital admissions. This is very misleading. Please, educate yourselves on how the vaccinated are being classified under CDC standards.
The CDC states, “In general, people are considered fully vaccinated: ±
2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or
2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine
If you don’t meet these requirements, regardless of your age, you are NOT fully vaccinated.
Keep taking all precautions until you are fully vaccinated.”
Therefore, those who are not “fully vaccinated” AND outside the prescribed two-week vaccination window, are counted as unvaccinated. This is deceptive.
Why can’t the CDC be transparent and add a third category of partially vaccinated if they do not wish to categorize a vaccinated person who is under two weeks post-vaccine? How do we know that newly vaccinated people are not the patients currently admitted to the hospital? After all, we are using an old vaccine for a variant it was not designed to protect against.
Secondly, the CDC stopped counting vaccine breakthrough cases in May 2021. *cases of COVID in the vaccinated.
This was roundly criticized by scientists and doctors. Many shared the same concern in neglecting to follow the real data and ensure we are protecting our most vulnerable population. If the vaccine cannot stop transmission, how can we protect the vulnerable? Will we create more variants with a leaky vaccine and will these strains negatively impact our children?
Thirdly, data collected is year-to-date. This is a major issue in that the CDC is muddying the data by counting unvaccinated persons before the vaccine was widely administered.
“Two-thirds of 2021 cases and 80 percent of deaths came before April 1, when only 15 percent of the country was fully vaccinated, which means calculating year-to-date ratios means possibly underestimating the prevalence of breakthrough cases by a factor of three and breakthrough deaths by a factor of five. And if the ratios are calculated using data sets that end before the Delta surge, as many have been, that adds an additional distortion, since both breakthrough cases and severe illness among the vaccinated appear to be significantly more common with this variant than with previous ones.” Confounding the issue by ignoring these problems does not impart confidence among the public.
The CDC’s failure to track and monitor this requires us to look at other countries with large vaccine administration. Are countries with high vaccine uptake like Israel fairing better than us? A report showed that “ Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection.”
Many of us have recovered and the public is benefiting from our robust immunity against the Delta variant and future covid strains.
Lastly, I encourage the board to reflect on their impact on the local community. The impression in the community over the last year was that CDH was unorganized, parroting misleading CDC guidance. Many of you do not have medical credentials and the best you can do is look to professionals for input. As we have seen, science is always changing.
Today’s guidance is based on fleeting data that will be updated and evolving tomorrow. Do you really feel comfortable making definitive proclamations based on rapidly changing data? The public has access to the same information you do. We can make decisions for ourselves.
Please, consider slowing down on your recommendations and recognize your limitations. Perhaps your next announcement can address your new restriction of power to an advisory role in House Bill 316.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html) COVID-19 Vaccination COVID-19 vaccines protect against COVID-19. Get safety info and more.
Saturday, September 25, 2021, 10:00 a.m. just BEHIND the Anne Frank Memorial on the grass by the greenbelt Health Freedom Idaho hosted speakers who have suffered injury from the vaccine. With a beautiful mural created by local high school students to help us visualize the actual number of lives that are being affected by the vaccine itself.
We will honor the victims with a moment of silence and the opportunity for silent prayer.
Our local media was so concerned that people might hear from a minority, they tried to spread the word that the memorial/vigil for those who have been injured or killed from the jab has been canceled. That was a lie. These talking heads don’t want you to know about these numbers and hear from the victims themselves.
This event was well attended by compassionate individuals who wanted to honor the pain and suffering of others. And even with threats from a representative of the Anne Frank Memorial to call the police and several disrespectful hecklers, the event proceeded peacefully.
a visual display created by local high schoolers. Each flower represents 100 lives lost or injured by the vaccine.
HFI hosted an event in Boise that the city and/or those who maintain the Human Rights Memorial attempted to silence with threats of calling the police. Truth prevailed!! We hosted an event ON PUBLIC PROPERTY that backs to the Human Rights Memorial. This event was to honor those who suffered injury and death, not a protest.
We gathered today because of tragedy. Individuals who did what we have all be told to do, for our own safety and for the benefit of others, suffered disastrous results. Children are now without their mother, a man without the ability to walk. Teens and formerly healthy young adults now have lifelong heart conditions. Individuals are dead and damaged by an experimental medical product. And our communities and cities, instead of providing support and compassion have ignored – worse yet, ridiculed these families for speaking bout the injury they suffered.
In fact, we are outside the Human Rights Memorial because the city of Boise and those who maintain the Human Rights Memorial felt that the voices of the minority shouldn’t be heard. Those quotes you read in the memorial are there because someone felt it significant to hear from the victims and to learn from the tragedy.
How ironic Boise and those who manage the Human Rights Memorial are attempting to discriminate and silence us today. Threats to call the police. Having their volunteers stand behind the speakers who have suffered from loss and permanent injury, in an attempt to mock them.
We came to acknowledge that more than 15,000 deaths nationwide have been reported. To give voice to the almost 21,000 people who are now struggling to live life with a permanent disability and the 12,000 whose hearts went from healthy to diseased After their jab. To all those who have said we shouldn’t have a memorial like this because there are 2000 Idahoans who died from COVID In the past 18 months. We want to also recognize there have been 2000 who reported having suffered from vaccine reactions in the past 9 months.
Honoring the suffering and pain of one individual does NOT deny the pain of another. There is enough pain to go around- what we are lacking is compassion.
HFI RESPONSE TO THOSE WHO THINK A MEMORIAL FOR THE VICTIMS OF VACCINES IS INAPPROPRIATE
Those who have suffered Injury because of COVID vaccines are suffering pain AND RIDICULE. Today, I hope they felt honored. Let them know they are seen, they are heard, they are believed. #choosecompassion#Respect#solidarity
One flower represents 100 individuals whose hearts went from healthy to diseased after the shot.Each lavender rose represents 100 people who now have to live with a permanent disability. The small flowers in the vase represent 100 preborn children who died after their pregnant moms received the vaccine.Data for 9/17one week increased of death, injury and suffering from the vaccine
This event is NOT a protest. This is a memorial designed to honor the voice of those who are trying to speak out but are being intentionally silenced and ridiculed by much of the public.
We pray that those who are suffering and injured know that they are seen. heard. believed.
Idaho Healthcare Personnel, Employees of Hospital Vendors, and Concerned Citizens:
First, I would like to thank you for your service to our state and for your dedication to helping Idaho citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Words alone cannot express our heartfelt gratitude for your dedication and bravery during the past 17 months.
As your Lt. Governor, I am concerned that a sudden loss of healthcare personnel might lead to a healthcare crisis in our state. Therefore, I would like to help you understand your rights as both citizens and employees as they pertain to personal healthcare decisions and to issues of potential discrimination.
The law is clear about informed consent for healthcare treatment and procedures. Below please find information I hope is helpful.
Informed consent is required in state law:
Any person, including one who is developmentally disabled and not a respondent as defined in section 66-402, Idaho Code, who comprehends the need for, the nature of and the significant risks ordinarily inherent in any contemplated hospital, medical, dental, surgical or other health care, treatment or procedure is competent to consent thereto on his or her own behalf. Any health care provider may provide such health care and services in reliance upon such a consent if the consenting person appears to the health care provider securing the consent to possess such requisite comprehension at the time of giving the consent.
Consent, or refusal to consent, for the furnishing of health care, treatment or procedures shall be valid in all respects if the person giving or refusing the consent is sufficiently aware of pertinent facts respecting the need for, the nature of, and the significant risks ordinarily attendant upon such a person receiving such care, as to permit the giving or withholding of such consent to be a reasonably informed decision.
Obtaining sufficient consent for health care is the duty of the attending health care provider upon whose order or at whose direction the contemplated health care, treatment or procedure is rendered; provided however, a licensed hospital and any employee of a health care provider, acting with the approval of such an attending or other individual health care provider, may perform the ministerial act of documenting such consent by securing the completion and execution of a form or statement in which the giving of consent for such care is documented by or on behalf of the person.
Also, according to state law, the right to work shall not be subject to undue restraint or coercion:
It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the state of Idaho, in order to maximize individual freedom of choice in the pursuit of employment and to encourage an employment climate conducive to economic growth, that the right to work shall not be subject to undue restraint or coercion.
Most of the healthcare providers have Human Resource (HR) Departments. It is their responsibility to ensure that policies, working conditions and the concerns of employees in the workplace are addressed in an appropriate manner. As employees, it is our responsibility to notify the HR Department when there are untenable conditions in the workplace. Here are some things to consider:
If you decide that you will not comply with a demand to receive a COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment, I suggest that you issue an affirmative statement to the company that you are opposed to the vaccine and do not intend to receive it based on a religious exemption, medical condition, or other circumstance. This notification will serve two purposes a) the company will know the seriousness of the policy and b) it will not be able to say that they were unprepared for the loss of their employee. A form could be developed and a specific request should be made that the form be placed in your employee file.
Ask the healthcare provider who is administering the vaccine if they have an informed consent form available, which should list out any side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. If you accept the risks from the vaccine you should sign it and keep it in your medical file. Remember, you have a right to provide this consent or not, according to state law.
Ask the company how they expect to receive verification of the COVID-19 vaccination if it is provided by another healthcare provider.
How will this COVID-19 vaccine status be disclosed to your supervisor for enforcement? There are legitimate concerns about the privacy of our individual healthcare information.
Document any forms of harassment or intimidation from your employer or direct supervisor. For example, being required to place a sticker on a name badge as a show of compliance may be considered a form of intimidation. The recommended course of action, should you believe discrimination is occurring, is to file a complaint within your HR Department for each case of harassment or intimidation, no matter what form it takes. If you do not feel comfortable doing this, at least keep a personal diary of any incident.
The purpose of all of this information is to provide evidence in the case of a lawsuit for termination of employment. The employee might have standing if they demonstrate that they have done all they could to notify the company and ask for an opportunity to seek accommodation. If anyone were to walk off the job prior to this date, there may not be any recourse. It would simply be deemed that you quit and you might not be able to claim unemployment compensation.
Please staff your stations until the day comes when the company where you work will choose to implement their vaccine mandate. Ultimately, this decision rests on hospital leadership and administration. I have asked them to come to the table to discuss the mandate and its impacts. Other, longer-term alternatives may be available as well, but for now the above would be my advice.
Most of all, please know that I and others are making an earnest effort to amicably resolve this.
STOP THE MANDATE Protest hosted by Health Freedom Idaho drew a crowd of thousand or more who lined the busy boulevard in front of the St Lukes Medical Plaza in Meridian. Nurses, staff, their friends and family, and all supporters of health freedom waved, whistled, clapped, and cheered as drivers honked in support.
This mandate will place all employees who haven’t been vaccinated with the experimental COVID 19 shot by September 1st on unpaid leave. This keeps the employees, staff, and vendors unable to pay their bills and unable to collect unemployment. Coercion is not consent.
The FDA says that vaccines can not be mandated while under the EUA status. Idaho hospital administration has been informed and the legislative leadership has taken a stand that they will not protect the citizens’ right to bodily autonomy. Patients are concerned with a drop in staff that this coercion will cause when a portion of the staff remains on unpaid leave.
We are concerned that if the administration doesn’t honor the bodily autonomy of the staff they will not honor the bodily autonomy and informed consent patients.
I stopped for you to cross the street in front of me. I saw your blue shirts and your posters I clapped and gave you a thumbs up in admiration then it hit me like a ton of bricks. I was moved to tears that I couldn’t stop. You were fighting for me ! You were fighting for my right to choose you were fighting for my lively hood. Words could never express how thankful I am for you all today ! I waited in that loooong line leaving work just so I could honk and see your faces ! The faces of the TRUE HEROS !!! Thank you for standing for us all today ! #stillahero#freedom
Idaho’s panel counsel for America’s Frontline Doctors responds to COVID-19 vaccine mandates from Saint Lukes, Saint Alphonsus, and Primary Health. Stating that these organizations are “unilaterally amending employment contracts and unlawfully attempting to require all employees, providers, volunteers, and contractors to receive a “COVID-19 vaccine” in contravention of, inter alia, patients’ informed consent1, fundamental constitutional rights to bodily autonomy, and federal law and regulations.”
Correspondence from the hospital to employees makes claims that “COVID-19 vaccines are proven to be extremely safe and effective,’ and that religious exemptions are and should be ‘rare’.
QUESTIONABLE SAFETY
EFFECTIVENESS IS NOT GUARANTEED
You are well-advised to consider that all “COVID -19 vaccines” are under an emergency use authorization (EAU) and may not be mandated in Idaho, by either a public or private entity.3
Currently, all “COVID-19 vaccines” are merely authorized, not approved or licensed, by the federal government; they are being issued under an invalid EAU only. The EAU guidance and regulations state that they “may be effective.”
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IS PROTECTED BY IDAHO CONSTITUTION
Religious liberty is guaranteed under Article 1, section 4 of the Idaho Constitution. In Idaho, “the exercise and enjoyment of religious faith and worship shall forever be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions….”
IDAHO INFORMED CONSENT LAWS APPLY
The obligation to obtain sufficient consent “is the duty of the attending health care provider upon whose order or at whose direction the contemplated health care, treatment or procedure is rendered….” I.C. § 39-4508.
MANDATES OF EMERGENCY USE VACCINES VIOLATE THE NUREMBERG CODE
We are shocked that you, as a representative and leader of Idaho’s medical community, would engage in conduct that even approaches having an appearance of violating the Nuremberg Code or the Hippocratic Oath.
Your categorical requirement that all employees and contractors follow your order without an examination or diagnosis and receive an emergency-use “COVID-19 vaccine” without informed consent is an illegal contract and cannot be enforced. Yoo v. Jho, 147 Cal.App4th 1249, 1251 (2007); and Fellom v. Adams, 274 Cal.App.2d 855, 863 (1969). It clearly violates Idaho’s public policy which requires informed consent for every medical treatment or procedure. This illegal conduct simply cannot be enforced in the courts and will result in substantial liability.
Idaho’s panel counsel for America’s Frontline Doctors Letters to St. Lukes and St. Alphonsus
Several major Idaho employers, including St. Luke’s, St. Alphonsus, and Primary Care have stated that they will now discriminate based on their employees’ personal health choices. This is wrong and needs to be made explicitly illegal. The Governor of Idaho protected the jobs of State Employees from being affected by their COVID-19 vaccination status with Executive Order 2021-04, but this does nothing to protect those who work for someone other than the State of Idaho. No one should be forced to choose between keeping their job and undergoing a medical procedure that violates their bodily autonomy, especially one which lacks long-term data, has inherent risk, and is still only under experimental use authorization.
WE THE PEOPLE need to stand side by side with our healthcare professionals and NOT permit their employers to coerce them into vaccine mandates! Now more than ever, we need to rise up and say NO!
Here’s what you can do:
1. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS IN IDAHO LAW ARE SPECIFIC FOR CHILDREN. The medical, philosophical, and religious exemptions we talk about all the time through HFI are only applicable to minor children, and only for school and daycare attendance.
2. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS SHOULD EXIST IN YOUR WORKPLACE. Look into any possible exemption for adults with their employers are ones that may or may not be available through any given company. Please inquire with your employer. (Information regarding moral/religious exemption) Utilize the resources below.
3. UNITE! You are strong, especially together. You have the God-given right to your bodily autonomy, and you have strength in numbers. Talk to each other. Here’s a Facebook group for healthcare workers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/377518550406136/
TELEGRAM RESOURCE: #STOPTHEMANDATE
4. RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE: For detailed information about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to immunizations, see the Vaccine Rights Manuals. This applies to exemptions for employees (civilian and military), student clinical work, immigration, and daycare and school exemptions in a couple of states. Free Printable Notice to Employer Letter found at Health Freedom Defense, Detailed Manual for purchase at Alan Phillips at Vaccine Rights.com, The Healthy American also has a how-to-write vaccine exemption material. Pacific Justice Institute has a 5 page write-up including quotes from the CDC about the inability of employers to mandate vaccines under EUA.
Questions and Answers on the Covid-19 Vaccine Pacific Justice Institute July 2, 2021 Question: Can my employer order me to be vaccinated against Covid (also referred to as COVID-19, novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2) and can they threaten to fire me if I do not comply? Answer: First, no one can force you to take the Covid vaccine, because it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The vaccine is currently being administered under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) because the vaccines were not studied for a sufficient time to ensure there are no long-term side effects. There are a number of authorities and resources you can cite that show you cannot be forced to take a vaccine. Consider the following four examples:
The EUA itself, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3, requires “. . . Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product . . .”1
Each person who is about to receive a Covid vaccine is given a fact sheet, which states in part: “WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET THE (insert drug company name) COVID-19 VACCINE? It is your choice to receive or not receive the (insert drug company name) COVID-19 Vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.”2
In the 2004 case of Doe v. Rumsfeld, 3 plaintiffs challenged the government’s Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program (AVIP), because anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) had never been approved by the FDA as a safe and effective drug for protection against inhalation anthrax. Yet the government was forcing military personnel to take the vaccine. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an injunction 1 See, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 – Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. Subsection (e)(1)(A)(ii) 2 See, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html. 3 Doe v. Rumsfeld, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668. visit Pacific Justice Institute to download your complete copy.
Print/Forward this Letter from Attorney from American Frontline Doctors to Saint Alphonsus Regarding Vaccine Mandates. Download it below.
5. USE THE ‘NOTICE TO THE EMPLOYER‘ PROVIDED BY HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE Health Freedom Defense has a one-page notice that clearly delineates that a COVID VACCINE MANDATE is in violation of the federal statute. Health Freedom Defense Fund can send a cease and desist letter and possibly initiate further legal action. In addition Contact Health Freedom Defense regarding your situation. Submit your information including your explanation of the situation, the company name and address, the name of the CEO of the company, and his or her email address can be emailed to info@healthfreedomdefense.org.
7. SHARE YOUR SITUATION WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS Let your representatives in the government know how this mandate is affecting your employment, livelihood, and bodily autonomy. Explain the discrimination and ask for them to intercede. We also ask that you include HFI in your correspondence so that we can have a collection of correspondence to share with liberty-minded legislators and legal teams that are working to support freedom.
Have you been discriminated against at work because of your decision to take the shot or not? Has your place of employment forced you to wear a mask or risk losing your job? If so, please share your story or affidavit with the email below. Please include your first name, phone number, and zip code. nomorevaccinationdiscrimination@protonmail.com
Contact Governor Brad Little. Email: governor@gov.idaho.gov State Capitol PO Box 83720 Boise, ID, 83720. Phone Number: 208-334-2100
Contact the Speaker of the House: Scott Bedke (R) District 27. (208) 332-1111. SBedke@house.idaho.gov
8. ASK FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO SUPPORT YOU. Have friends and family correspond with their legislators, the Governor, and the Speaker of the House, and your employer about the fact that as patients they want the healthcare staff to have bodily autonomy.
9. JOIN US as WE STAND IN PROTEST TO VACCINE MANDATES FOR OUR HEALTHCARE WORKERS hosted by American Frontline Doctors and Health Freedom Idaho JULY 19, 2021 Location: St. Lukes on Eagle Road in Meridian 4:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Each one of us must take a stand for sovereignty and bodily autonomy CITIZENS WEAR ROYAL BLUE HOSPITAL STAFF/EMPLOYEES WEAR BLUE SCRUBS
10. PRAY! If you are a praying individual NOW would be the time to get on your knees and pray for wisdom and strength for our healthcare workers and other employees who are faced with what could be a life/death job/termination decision for their families. Prayers for our employers, the business owners, government officials, and leaders in the community to make the right decision to protect liberty, bodily sovereignty and to protect the rights of individuals to make their own personal healthcare choices without coercion.
Your right to bodily autonomy is a God-given right protected by our Federal Statues, Idaho Constitution, and numberous Idaho laws.
Federal statutes: VACCINE UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION.
“What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” – Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense
Regarding compulsory COVID-19 requirement imposed upon an employee violates federal law. 1 Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”). However, the statute requires that: individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title I of ADA Title I of the ADA applies to private employers with 15 or more employees. It also applies to state and local government employers, employment agencies, and labor unions.
All nondiscrimination standards under Title I of the ADA also apply to federal agencies under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces these federal civil rights laws in employment, has issued guidance on COVID-19 and vaccination policies. The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are relevant to employers or lawmakers crafting vaccination requirements. EEOC provides examples of potential reasonable accommodations. Examples of a “reasonable accommodation” for employees who cannot comply with a vaccine mandate because of a disability; religious belief, practice or observance; or pregnancy include requiring the unvaccinated employee to:
Wear a face mask at work
Work at a social distance from co-workers or non-employees
Idaho Constitution Art 1 Sec 4: “The liberty of conscience hereby secured…” and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions; IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.
LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOVSection 18-611FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS 18-611 (3) Employers of health care professionals shall reasonably accommodate the conscience rights of their employees as provided in this section, upon advanced written notification by the employee. Such notice shall suffice without specification of the reason therefor. It shall be unlawful for any employer to discriminate against any health care professional based upon his or her declining to provide a health care service that violates his or her conscience unless the employer can demonstrate that such accommodation poses an undue hardship.
39-9003 (2) It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America. Additional Information and Resources regarding risk, statistics, and the science (that is currently being censored by mainstream media)
Informed Consent
The EUA (emergency use authorization) statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
www.c19vaxreactions.com is a place to network and see others having the same symptoms, that have been injured by this vaccine.
These hospital mandates are likely a death sentence for some of your employees as shown by the table above. Note that over 9,000 deaths have been reported to and compiled into the VAERS system. Have you confirmed which employees have already contracted “the virus” and are now immune?
LIABILITY FREE PRODUCTS
On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of HHS invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness act (PREP Act) and declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency, warranting liability protection for covered countermeasures, which includes vaccination. If an individual is injured or killed by a COVID-19 vaccine, the manufacturer cannot be held liable per the PREP Act. The only possible recourse should you or a loved one suffer injury or death is to pursue compensation through the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, which has a difficult threshold for proving a relationship between an injury and the vaccine, a short statute of limitations, no avenue for appeals and doesn’t pay damages for pain or suffering.
The liability exempt status for vaccine manufacturers is not new. Pharmaceutical companies have enjoyed their liability-free status for all vaccinations on the CDC schedule since the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. After large numbers of lawsuits were brought forth for injuries and deaths resulting from the DPT vaccine, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to protect pharmaceutical companies from liability specifically for vaccines. No other product or industry is protected from liability for injury and death in this way.
Without any liability, what incentive is there to ensure the vaccine is as safe as possible? Will the employer requiring vaccination be held liable for injury and/or death?
Workplaces have begun the roll-out of mandated vaccines, even before the FDA approval. Could employees request a religious exemption due to the fact that all COVID 19 vaccines were developed, produced and/or tested from aborted fetal cell lines? Is an exemption necessary since it’s illegal to mandate a vaccine prior to FDA approval? What about when the vaccines ARE approved?
IT WAS OBVIOUS VACCINE MANDATES WHY DIDN’T THE LEGISLATURE PROTECT THE CITIZENS?
During the 2021 Session, HFI supported the civil rights bill House Bill 140 MEDICAL CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT – which added to existing law to prohibit discrimination against certain persons on the basis of their vaccination status and to prohibit state contracts with companies that engage in such discrimination. After it overwhelmingly passed the House, Senator Jim Patrick was instructed by Blue Cross of Idaho and IACI to deny the bill a public hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee. The will of the people to secure our liberty and bodily autonomy was crushed by one bought man’s actions. Senators on the Commerce committee argued and argued for the bill to be brought out and publicly debated. Chairman Patrick refused. Jim Patrick, the injuries and possible deaths that may occur in the hospital employee population is the blood that will partially be on your hands. You failed Idaho with your cowardice and your love of power and money.
Senator Patrick did not protect our healthcare workers when he had the opportunity.
CALL TO ACTION: SENATOR PATRICK refused to allow a hearing for people’s bill (H140) The Medical Consumer Protection Act because of his connections to Pharma and the insurance industry. The ramifications to people’s livelihoods and healthcare are partially on his hands. Please let him know how the jab requirements will affect you, your family, your health, and your livelihood. mailto: JPatrick@senate.idaho.gov Call +12087336897
YES, THE COVID-19 VACCINES UTILIZE ABORTED FETAL MATERIAL.
Coronavirus vaccines developed in the States and globally were made from the cell lines of aborted children — healthy children who were murdered. Most notably, this includes a fetal cell line called HEK-293, from the kidney of a healthy girl aborted in 1972, and PER.C6, from the retina of a healthy boy aborted in 1985. As a Christian, Can I Take a Vaccine Made from Aborted Babies?This moral dilemma is answered by John Piper founder and teacher of DesiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary.
While the issue of aborted fetal cell line use in vaccine production is now widely discussed, there are few places that document each of these cell lines and the abortions performed to develop them from primary and official sources.
As of 16 May 2020, using mostly primary sources available on the internet, NODECEPTION.ORG documented that at least 181 abortions have been performed to develop fetal cell lines for the manufacturing of a variety of our vaccines, including the Covid-19 vaccines currently being used and those in development. Details on all the cell lines are documented here.
SoundChoice.org produced an accurate chart reflecting the COVID vaccines likely to be used in the U.S. that utilized aborted fetal material.
IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.
LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOV Section 18-611FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
MY JOB IS REQUIRING THE VACCINE! NOW WHAT?
Visit HealthFreedomDefense.org, a plethora of Resources can be found there. Most people don’t understand that the masks that are being used, the tests that are being forced on people, and the vaccines are being forced on people. We knew this was coming.
“What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” – Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense
DOES THE SUPREMECY CLAUSE PROVIDE PROTECTION?
It’s Federal Law Title 21 section 360bbb-3. In the constitution is the Supremacy Clause. What the Supremacy Clause means is that no city, state, county, or whatever can implement a law, ordinance, or anything else that conflicts with the Federal Law. The Federal Law preempts local law. We have it right there in black and white that these products, all of them, are issued under Emergency Use Authorization and that we’re required to be informed of the problems with them, known and unknown, and also informed of the right to refuse. What people can do is they can download those forms, whether it’s a mask, a test or the vaccine, and provide the notice. There are two things on there. There’s an FAQ for the masks, tests, and vaccines. There’s a notice to employers for each of those. My law firm is sending those letters to employers.
In other words, are you implying that mandating the vaccine is illegal? A workplace can’t say, “You must be vaccinated to work here.” “I’m not implying it. We are going to be litigating it.”
Interview with Leslie Manookian
Leslie: “What I’m encouraging people to do is to download those forms, print them, or email them to their employers if they’re being threatened and say, “This is Federal Law and you can’t do this.” Health Freedom Defense is trying to develop a network of lawyers to whom we can refer people who understand the law and can fight on their behalf.”
About Leslie Manookian
Leslie Manookian established the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) to ameliorate health injustice through education and advocacy. Health Freedom Defense aids families and individuals whose health rights have been infringed and supports legal challenges to unjust laws that undermine our health and freedoms. Of primary concern to HFDF is challenging a mandatory COVID vaccine.
WITH KNOWN RISKS, SHOULDN’T THERE BE A CHOICE?
Researchers around the world are voicing their concerns about the potential immediate and long-term side-effects of these rushed vaccines, including the possibility of infertility in females.
Everyone needs to be personally responsible for their own health and should research the COVID-19 vaccines in development carefully before making a decision whether or not to vaccinate without coercion by employers.
Individuals who are suffering adverse effects: Vax Long Haulers and www.c19vaxreactions.com A certain percentage of people – in the thousands – who had the covid vaccine are suffering from debilitating symptoms. Our lives, in many cases, have been ruined with terrifying symptoms, leaving many of us with the inability to work. The widespread general denial – even bullying – of those facing symptoms is making matters worse. Bitchute channel, and is also on the Rumble channel.
IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT
There is within Idaho Statute the protection of freedom of choice when it comes to medical decisions.
