Category: Health Freedom

  • Your Right to Choose to Decline Workplace Vaccination

    Several major Idaho employers, including St. Luke’s, St. Alphonsus, and Primary Care have stated that they will now discriminate based on their employees’ personal health choices. This is wrong and needs to be made explicitly illegal. The Governor of Idaho protected the jobs of State Employees from being affected by their COVID-19 vaccination status with Executive Order 2021-04, but this does nothing to protect those who work for someone other than the State of Idaho.
    No one should be forced to choose between keeping their job and undergoing a medical procedure that violates their bodily autonomy, especially one which lacks long-term data, has inherent risk, and is still only under experimental use authorization. 

    WE THE PEOPLE need to stand side by side with our healthcare professionals and NOT permit their employers to coerce them into vaccine mandates! Now more than ever, we need to rise up and say NO!


    Here’s what you can do: 


    1. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS IN IDAHO LAW ARE SPECIFIC FOR CHILDREN. The medical, philosophical, and religious exemptions we talk about all the time through HFI are only applicable to minor children, and only for school and daycare attendance.

    2. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS SHOULD EXIST IN YOUR WORKPLACE. Look into any possible exemption for adults with their employers are ones that may or may not be available through any given company. Please inquire with your employer. (Information regarding moral/religious exemption) Utilize the resources below.

    3. UNITE! You are strong, especially together. You have the God-given right to your bodily autonomy, and you have strength in numbers. Talk to each other. Here’s a Facebook group for healthcare workers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/377518550406136/

    TELEGRAM RESOURCE: #STOPTHEMANDATE

    4. RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE: For detailed information about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to immunizations, see the Vaccine Rights Manuals. This applies to exemptions for employees (civilian and military), student clinical work, immigration, and daycare and school exemptions in a couple of states. Free Printable Notice to Employer Letter found at Health Freedom Defense, Detailed Manual for purchase at Alan Phillips at Vaccine Rights.com, The Healthy American also has a how-to-write vaccine exemption material. Pacific Justice Institute has a 5 page write-up including quotes from the CDC about the inability of employers to mandate vaccines under EUA.

    Questions and Answers on the Covid-19 Vaccine
    Pacific Justice Institut    e
    July 2, 2021
    Question: Can my employer order me to be vaccinated against Covid (also referred to as
    COVID-19, novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2) and can they threaten to fire me if I do not
    comply?
    Answer: First, no one can force you to take the Covid vaccine, because it has not been
    approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The vaccine is currently being
    administered under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) because the vaccines were not
    studied for a sufficient time to ensure there are no long-term side effects. There are a number
    of authorities and resources you can cite that show you cannot be forced to take a vaccine.
    Consider the following four examples:

    1. The EUA itself, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3, requires “. . . Individuals to whom the product
      is administered are informed— of the option to accept or refuse administration of the
      product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product . . .”1
    2. Each person who is about to receive a Covid vaccine is given a fact sheet, which states in
      part: “WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET THE (insert drug company name) COVID-19
      VACCINE? It is your choice to receive or not receive the (insert drug company name)
      COVID-19 Vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard
      medical care.”2
    3. In the 2004 case of Doe v. Rumsfeld,
      3 plaintiffs challenged the government’s Anthrax
      Vaccination Immunization Program (AVIP), because anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) had
      never been approved by the FDA as a safe and effective drug for protection against
      inhalation anthrax. Yet the government was forcing military personnel to take the
      vaccine. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an injunction
      1 See, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 – Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. Subsection (e)(1)(A)(ii) 2 See, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html. 3 Doe v. Rumsfeld, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668.
      visit Pacific Justice Institute to download your complete copy.
    Print/Forward this Letter from Attorney from American Frontline Doctors to Saint Alphonsus Regarding Vaccine Mandates. Download it below.
    2021-07-09-Letter-to-Saint-Als-v-4-Redacted-1Download
    2021-07-13-Letter-to-Saint-Lukes-v-2-1Download

    5. USE THE ‘NOTICE TO THE EMPLOYER‘ PROVIDED BY HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE
    Health Freedom Defense has a one-page notice that clearly delineates that a COVID VACCINE MANDATE is in violation of the federal statute. Health Freedom Defense Fund can send a cease and desist letter and possibly initiate further legal action. In addition Contact Health Freedom Defense regarding your situation. Submit your information including your explanation of the situation, the company name and address, the name of the CEO of the company, and his or her email address can be emailed to info@healthfreedomdefense.org.  

    6. FILE A COMPLAINT
    File a complaint with Idaho Human Rights Commission https://humanrights.idaho.gov/Idaho-Law/Contexts/File-a-Complaint.

    7. SHARE YOUR SITUATION WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS
    Let your representatives in the government know how this mandate is affecting your employment, livelihood, and bodily autonomy. Explain the discrimination and ask for them to intercede. We also ask that you include HFI in your correspondence so that we can have a collection of correspondence to share with liberty-minded legislators and legal teams that are working to support freedom.

    Have you been discriminated against at work because of your decision to take the shot or not? Has your place of employment forced you to wear a mask or risk losing your job? If so, please share your story or affidavit with the email below. Please include your first name, phone number, and zip code. nomorevaccinationdiscrimination@protonmail.com

    EASY COPY AND PASTE EMAIL LIST:

    nomorevaccinationdiscrimination@protonmail.com, SBedke@house.idaho.gov, governor@gov.idaho.gov,
    *be sure to look up your legislators to email them as well as your company CEO 

    THE HEALTH ORGANIZATION CEO

    8. ASK FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO SUPPORT YOU.
    Have friends and family correspond with their legislators, the Governor, and the Speaker of the House, and your employer about the fact that as patients they want the healthcare staff to have bodily autonomy.

    9. JOIN US as WE STAND IN PROTEST TO VACCINE MANDATES FOR OUR HEALTHCARE WORKERS
    hosted by American Frontline Doctors and Health Freedom Idaho
    JULY 19, 2021
    Location: St. Lukes on Eagle Road in Meridian
    4:00 pm – 6:00 pm

    Each one of us must take a stand for sovereignty and bodily autonomy
    CITIZENS WEAR ROYAL BLUE
    HOSPITAL STAFF/EMPLOYEES WEAR BLUE SCRUBS

    10. PRAY! If you are a praying individual NOW would be the time to get on your knees and pray for wisdom and strength for our healthcare workers and other employees who are faced with what could be a life/death job/termination decision for their families. Prayers for our employers, the business owners, government officials, and leaders in the community to make the right decision to protect liberty, bodily sovereignty and to protect the rights of individuals to make their own personal healthcare choices without coercion.

    Your right to bodily autonomy is a God-given right protected by our Federal Statues, Idaho Constitution, and numberous Idaho laws.

    Federal statutes: VACCINE UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION.

    “What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
    – Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense

    Regarding compulsory COVID-19 requirement imposed upon an employee violates federal law.
    1 Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”). However, the statute requires that: individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

    “BREAKING NEWS: FDA updated the EUA Fact sheet for all 3 Covid vaccines to let people know that you have a CHOICE to get or not get the vaccine. Attorneys across the US are saying forcing someone to get one to attend college or keep your job violates the federal common rule.”
    Johnson & Johnson: https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download
    Pfizer:https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
    Moderna:https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download


    CIVIL RIGHTS & DISCRIMINATION
    The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Title I of ADA Title I of the ADA applies to private employers with 15 or more employees. It also applies to state and local government employers, employment agencies, and labor unions.

    All nondiscrimination standards under Title I of the ADA also apply to federal agencies under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces these federal civil rights laws in employment, has issued guidance on COVID-19 and vaccination policies. The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are relevant to employers or lawmakers crafting vaccination requirements. EEOC provides examples of potential reasonable accommodations.  Examples of a “reasonable accommodation” for employees who cannot comply with a vaccine mandate because of a disability; religious belief, practice or observance; or pregnancy include requiring the unvaccinated employee to:

    • Wear a face mask at work
    • Work at a social distance from co-workers or non-employees
    • Work a modified shift
    • Get periodic COVID-19 tests
    • Work via a provided telework arrangement
    • Accept a reassignment 

    SOURCE: COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements: Potential Constraints on Employer Mandates Under Federal Law https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10573

    IDAHO PROTECTIONS

    Idaho Constitution Art 1 Sec 4: “The liberty of conscience hereby secured…” and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions;
    IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.

     Idaho Medical Consent and Natural Death Act allow any person within the state of Idaho to choose which medical treatments to receive or refuse. I.C. § 39-4501 et seq.  

    LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOV Section 18-611 FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
    18-611 (3) Employers of health care professionals shall reasonably accommodate the conscience rights of their employees as provided in this section, upon advanced written notification by the employee. Such notice shall suffice without specification of the reason therefor. It shall be unlawful for any employer to discriminate against any health care professional based upon his or her declining to provide a health care service that violates his or her conscience unless the employer can demonstrate that such accommodation poses an undue hardship.


    RESOURCE INFORMATION: hfi.designbyparrish.com/workplaces-mandating-abortion-tainted-covid-19-vaccines/

    LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOV Section 39-9003 IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT

    39-9003 (2)  It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America.
     Additional Information and Resources regarding risk, statistics, and the science (that is currently being censored by mainstream media)

    Informed Consent

    The EUA (emergency use authorization) statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

    www.c19vaxreactions.com is a place to network and see others having the same symptoms, that have been injured by this vaccine.

    These hospital mandates are likely a death sentence for some of your employees as shown by the table above.
    Note that over 9,000 deaths have been reported to and compiled into the VAERS  system.
    Have you confirmed which employees have already contracted “the virus” and are now immune? 

    LIABILITY FREE PRODUCTS

    On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of HHS invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness act (PREP Act) and declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency, warranting liability protection for covered countermeasures, which includes vaccination. If an individual is injured or killed by a COVID-19 vaccine, the manufacturer cannot be held liable per the PREP Act. The only possible recourse should you or a loved one suffer injury or death is to pursue compensation through the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, which has a difficult threshold for proving a relationship between an injury and the vaccine, a short statute of limitations, no avenue for appeals and doesn’t pay damages for pain or suffering.

    The liability exempt status for vaccine manufacturers is not new. Pharmaceutical companies have enjoyed their liability-free status for all vaccinations on the CDC schedule since the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. After large numbers of lawsuits were brought forth for injuries and deaths resulting from the DPT vaccine, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to protect pharmaceutical companies from liability specifically for vaccines. No other product or industry is protected from liability for injury and death in this way.

    Without any liability, what incentive is there to ensure the vaccine is as safe as possible? Will the employer requiring vaccination be held liable for injury and/or death?

    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

    Health Freedom Defense Fund

  • Vaccines are the biggest cause of “coincidences”

    She died… while still at the vaccination site. “While seated in the observation area after the injection, the patient complained of feeling discomfort and while being evaluated by medical personnel, she lost consciousness,” he said. “Paramedics on scene began CPR almost immediately and continued, but she ultimately could not be revived.”

    “Her death does not appear to be related to the vaccine,” it said.

    mainstream media

    Are Coroner’s the newest authorities in the Medical Cartel?

    People are dying within minutes of this vaccine but “the coroner said” it didn’t have anything to do with the vaccines, so we are supposed to accept that as fact? Again… That’s not science. It’s religion. It’s weird because “the doctor said” that vaccines had nothing to do with regressive autism, but yet there are millions of stories (with plenty of documentation) to the contrary. Kids developing and speaking normally who regress IMMEDIATELY following vaccinations- losing spoken language, eye contact, and often motor skills. **Vaccine-induced autism settlement: https://www.prnewswire.com/…/court-awards-over-20…


    Vaccines are the biggest cause of “coincidences” that I’ve ever seen in my entire life.

    Kari Bundy – Health Activist

    Put your thinking caps on, folks. People are dropping dead under an hour after receiving these vaccines (almost 700 people as of Friday), and you still believe the media. The media who literally just did that thing that toddlers do when they do something wrong, and you don’t even ask about it, and they tell you what they did by randomly saying they didn’t do it. (“I didn’t color on the wall!”)

    That’s exactly what this headline is from the NY Post.

    This is also gaslighting.

    Woman drops dead after vaccine, but the vaccine had nothing to do with it. Sure, it didn’t…

    #coincidencebodycount

    reposted from Kari Bundy’s public post on Facebook

    More Resources:

    CDC: 653 Deaths Now Recorded Following Experimental mRNA COVID Injections with 12,697 Reported Injuries

    CDC: 653 Deaths Now Recorded Following Experimental mRNA COVID Injections with 12,697 Reported Injuries

    We Are Now on Minds.com, MeWe, and Gab, Telegram. Video channels at Brighteon .

  • Keep Our State Sovereignty NO on SJR101 and S1017

    SJR101 and S1017 grants authority to an unelected federal alphabet soup bureaucracy over drug policy in the state. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

    At least one Republican Senator, Christy Zito (Hammett), spoke against the measure. Zito said that the legislature can’t legislate temperance and morality but said she is personally against using recreational drugs.

    Zito went on to say,

    I just think that as we approach this, we need to be careful that we honor the choice of the individual, that we are careful not to combine policy with [the] constitution.

    Senator Christy Zito

    Sen. C. Scott Grow (R-Eagle) the bill’s sponsor said the measure was necessary to protect Idaho’s families. Grow listed off a number of reasons he is bringing the proposal forward.

    This proposes an amendment to the Idaho Constitution prohibiting the production, manufacture, transportation, sale, delivery, dispensing, distribution, possession, or use of certain psychoactive drugs. 

    Grow listed as one of the reasons,

    This amendment will allow Idahoans to choose for themselves whether they want to live in a drug-free state, free from drug culture, or not.

    Senator C. Scott Grow

    Grow continued with seven total reasons and said that burdens and risks to law enforcement. Grow addressed a number of questions in his opening statement, including saying that having the FDA listed in the amendment is not a concern.

    Grow also said that CBD oil would not be illegal under SJR 101 citing several attorneys he had spoken to. (read more here: Idaho Dispatch )

    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

    Keep in mind that this is a constitutional amendment so the legislature is voting whether or not to add this to the ballot for voters.

    What they don’t tell you is that the explanation of the issue on the ballot is essentially a commercial for the way they want you to vote. You would think that the information on the ballot would weigh out the pros and cons in such a way that the people, (with a pencil in hand) could make an educated vote, but it doesn’t.

    This is how we got stuck with Medicaid expansion that ID cannot afford. Why would we change our Constitution to say psychoactive drugs are never allowed in ID unless the FDA says so?

    Shouldn’t Idahoans have the opportunity to consider what is best for our great state?

    What this amendment says is if the FDA says they want to have a “documented clinical investigation” using psychoactive drugs (Page 2 lines 9 & 10) on Idahoans, that’s ok.

    But, if someone fighting cancer needs to use it medicinally that’s not ok?!? 😕 If passed, the amendment would effectively and permanently close the door for marijuana legalization via citizen’s ballot initiative.

    Absolute waste of time, money, and resources. We should be focusing on keeping this state free instead of fueling the pockets of big pharma and changing the constitution to make something “more” illegal than it already is. You are punishing veterans and others who need medical marijuana and any other medications in the future to combat continuing pain.

    Facebook Comment against SJR101

    We need to keep the federal government from dictating what is good for Idahoans! Let’s keep Idaho sovereign.

    SJR101 will be headed to the House State Affairs Committee. and then to the HOUSE FLOOR.

    EMAIL BLAST LIST:

    BCrane@house.idaho.gov,ARmstrong@house.idaho.gov,JPalmer@house.idaho.gov,VBar@house.idaho.gov,JHoltzclaw@house.idaho.gov,JMonks@house.idaho.gov,HScott@house.idaho.gov,KAndrus@house.idaho.gov,JYoung@house.idaho.gov,RFurniss@house.idaho.gov,KHanks@house.idaho.gov,BSkaug@house.idaho.gov

    Email ALL the Representatives here…https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-email-idaho…/

    Tell them to vote NO on the federal supremacy bill SJR 101. #DontBeAFederalSupremacist #5MinActivism

    S1017

    Another federal supremacy bill. This bill mirrors the FDA controlled substances scheduling and rescheduling decisions for 2020 including placing synthetic cannabinoids in schedule 1 while placing opiates in schedule 2. Idahoans should be making decisions for ID. Period.

    ***The 10th Amendment to the US Constitution says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

    Let’s remind our senators of the 10th amendment and tell them to vote NO on S1017.

    ✍️ Senate email list https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-senate-email-list/. ***This bill will likely be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow.

    Read the bill here 🤓https://legislature.idaho.gov/ses…/2021/legislation/S1017

    /#DontBeAFederalSupremacist#5MinActivism

  • 2021 Idaho Health Committee Email Contacts

    House Committee

    Health/child care, welfare
    Daily, am, Room EW20
    Secretary: Irene Moore
    Email: hhel@house.idaho.gov
    Phone: 332-1138

    FWood@house.idaho.gov, JVanderWoude@house.idaho.gov, MGibbs@house.idaho.gov, MBlanksma@house.idaho.gov, MKingsley@house.idaho.gov, CChristensen@house.idaho.gov, LLickley@house.idaho.gov, MErickson@house.idaho.gov, GFerch@house.idaho.gov, BMitchell@house.idaho.gov, SChew@house.idaho.gov, IRubel@house.idaho.gov, MDavis@house.idaho.gov,

    Senate Health Committee

    M, T, W, Th, 3:00 pm, Room WW54
    Secretary: Margo Miller
    Email: shel@senate.idaho.gov
    Phone: 332-1319

    FMartin@senate.idaho.gov, Riggs@senate.idaho.gov, LHeider@senate.idaho.gov, ALee@senate.idaho.gov, MHarris@senate.idaho.gov, JAgenbroad@senate.idaho.gov, CZito@senate.idaho.gov, MWintrow@senate.idaho.gov, ARabe@senate.idaho.org,

  • Healthcare Workers Adverse Reactions to the COVID VACCINE

    Perhaps a publicity stunt gone wrong. The CHI Memorial Hospital in Tennessee broadcasts vaccinating several members of their healthcare management teams. During our live stream of the drug injections at CHI Memorial, Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover while speaking to the media about receiving the drug injection mentioned she started feeling dizzy. SHE FAINTED 17 minutes AFTER SHOOTING UP. Thankfully one of the doctors behind her caught her.

    Tennessee

    Here’s the video of her getting the vaccine (timestamp 5:15)👉https://www.facebook.com/WRCBtv/videos/436286377544888/

    Alaska

    A SECOND Alaska healthcare worker has an allergic reaction to Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine just one day after another staff member at the same hospital went into anaphylactic shock.

    Anaphylactic shock is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction to an allergy from food, medicine, vaccine or even a type of material.

    The immune system releases chemicals that flood the body, blood pressure suddenly drops, and airways narrow, which prevents someone from breathing normally.

    Symptoms usually occur within minutes and include hives, a weak pulse, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and a swollen tongue or throat. 

    If not treated immediately, it can lead to death. 

    https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2020/12/16/alaska-healthcare-worker-hospitalized-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine/

    A second healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered an allergic reaction after getting Pfizer Inc’s coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday.

    He experienced symptoms such as eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat, which resolved in an hour after being given Benadryl. His reaction was less serious than another healthcare worker from the same hospital who went into anaphylactic shock on Tuesday.

    She is currently hospitalized and it is unclear when she will be discharged. The woman has no known history of allergies.

    Dec 18 updated:
    to reveal now a THIRD significant reaction

    So this unfortunate soul went to get a medical product injected into their body to SUPPOSEDLY “prevent” them from getting a medical issue only to GET A MEDICAL ISSUE. Oh, and what guarantee do they have that they’re protected? ZERO guarantees!! Fairtrade?

    I wonder how many of these instances are occurring that are NOT making it into mainstream media reporting? Hmm.

    By the way, wait until this Covid vaccine victim finds out that whatever medical bills they are incurring to address this crisis ARE NOT COVERED by the medical professional that administered the vaccine, the vaccine maker, or the government agency that suggested getting the shot was a good idea!

    Joseph Delgado

    United Kingdom

    The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered. It led the U.K.’s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine.

    What’s in the Vaccine causing allergic reactions?

    After the reactions, the U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a warning that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not be given the vaccine. 

    About 32 million Americans have food allergies, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. It’s unknown how many have drug allergies. 

    No such warning has been issued in the U.S.

    In fact, last weekend, the CDC said Americans with serious allergies can be immunized as long as they are monitored for 30 minutes after getting the shot. 

    However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requiring Pfizer to monitor for anaphylaxis in the U.S. and submit data, according to The New York Times, which first reported the reaction.  *So this first wave of vaccine recipients are our most valuable healthcare workers and also participating in safety trials.

    The agency has also advised people with allergies to consult with their physicians to ensure they are not allergic to any components of the vaccine. 

    All right folks, be sure to tell your doctor if you have had an allergic reaction to an injection of the following...

    According to the FDA website each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine also includes the following ingredients:

    • lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate),
    • 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,
    • N-ditetradecylacetamide,
    • 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol),
    • 0.01 mg potassium chloride,
    • 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate,
    • 0.36 mg sodium chloride,
    • 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose.
    • The diluent (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP)
      contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.

      The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine does not contain preservative. The vial stoppers are not made with natural rubber latex.

    Remember, it is possible to have an anaphylactic reaction to the following without ever having any allergies in the past as the woman in Britain did. Of course, if you do have a serious reaction, there is no liability for anyone who made or administered the vaccine.

    COVID-19 VACCINE MANUFACTURERS ARE EXEMPT FROM LIABILITY

    Adverse Reactions Will Determine if the Vaccine is Safe

    The CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system. Do you realize what this means?

    You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.

    Perhaps that’s why some healthcare workers are FAKING injections.

    “As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC

    Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, I would like to point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀
    https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/

    But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.

    Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself.
    https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

    •Guillain-Barré syndrome
    •Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
    •Transverse myelitis
    •Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
    meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
    encepholapathy
    •Convulsions/seizures
    •Stroke
    •Narcolepsy and cataplexy
    •Anaphylaxis
    •Acute myocardial infarction
    •Myocarditis/pericarditis
    •Autoimmune disease
    •Deaths
    •Pregnancy and birth outcomes
    •Other acute demyelinating diseases
    •Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
    •Thrombocytopenia
    •Disseminated intravascular coagulation
    •Venous thromboembolism
    •Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
    •Kawasaki disease
    •Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
    in Children
    •Vaccine enhanced disease

    ***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.

    For those looking for data on the Moderna Covid 19 vaccine…

    -45 participants age 18-55
    -20 participants age 56-70
    -20 participants age 71 or older
    -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.

    To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements.  56% of the people who applied were rejected.

    Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal  85 people:

    Age 18-55:     71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION

    Age 56-70:     50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION

    Age 71+:         70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION

    How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?

    https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download”

     


  • When will we see an end to mask requirements and gathering restrictions?

    The Boise Health Department answers the question we all keep asking since March – when will all these restrictions be over? Ted Epperly, MD & Board Member of Central District Health said in their meeting on December 15th: Idaho is currently at 85-90 positive cases per 100,000 people. In order for CDH to remove/withdraw mask mandates and restrictions on gatherings, we need to be down below 2 per 100,000…That’s less than 33 positive cases in all of Idaho. 😳

    << We have 1.65 million people here in Idaho. Divide by 100,000, times 2.33 cases. >>

    Let’s just pretend we’re talking about the Flu.👉🏻 Saying we need to have less than 2 cases per 100,000 people is like saying we should have mask mandates if we don’t have less than 6,400 cases of Flu in the US.

    Do you know how many cases of Flu there are in the US each year?

    Let’s just pretend we have 90 cases of Flu per 100,000 people in the US (that’s currently where we are at with C0VlD in Idaho), that would be 288,000 cases of Flu in the entire country. Ok great.

    Now let’s look at REALITY (with Flu Vaccines Available)

    During the 2017 – 2018 Flu Season, CDC estimates there were between 9.3 to 45 MILLION cases of Flu in the US.

    Does Central District Health really want less than 2 cases per 100,000? This Doctor can’t be serious! If he is serious, Idaho will NEVER be done with a mask mandate. None of this is scientific or reasonable. It’s a completely asinine and unobtainable requirement.
    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

    Shared from a public post by Ashley Everly

    WATCH THE VIDEO HERE: https://www.facebook.com/ashleyeverlyvax/videos/3660444553977154

  • If you don’t comply, your life isn’t worth saving?

    At an emergency board meeting today, the Board of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare approved  a temporary administrative rule that allows for the timely activation of crisis standards of care during a pandemic, natural disaster. or other emergency that is overwhelming Idaho’s healthcare system.

    There was NO PUBLIC NOTICE of this emergency meeting and the vote did not involve the public.

    According to the Health and Welfare Website: “Crisis standards of care are guidelines that help healthcare providers and healthcare systems decide how to deliver the best care possible under the extraordinary circumstances of a disaster. Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines would be used when resources are insufficient to provide the usual standard of care to people who need it.

    Directory of the Health Department (NOT a medical doctor) Determines Priority of Medical Treatment

    Under the rules approved by the board Friday, in the event there’s an emergency that makes health care resources scarce, the Department of Health and Welfare director would have a central role in on-the-ground healthcare decision-making. It would be up to him to convene a panel that would decide whether medical facilities could begin rationing care according to a state-approved formula. Members of the panel include representatives of the Idaho Hospital Association, “healthcare entities,” and long-term care facilities. The panel would also include employees of the Department of Health and Welfare, public health districts, and anyone else the director might deem appropriate. https://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/news/board-health-and-welfare-adopts-rule-timely-activation-crisis-standards-care

    Idaho Freedom Foundation makes this point:

    This unwise decision puts state agencies in the middle of a discussion that could easily be managed by the medical providers themselves. There’s nothing stopping the state’s hospitals, clinics, and individual practitioners from collaborating in an emergency, sharing intel, and resources. The Department of Health and Welfare board, the department, and its director shouldn’t be part of the discussion. They’re not needed. https://idahofreedom.org/crisis-standard-of-care/

    Idaho Media asks this question: “Will people who follow COVID-19 rules get priority?

    ”Stop and really think about that question. Will people who wash their hands and stay 6 feet away from others get priority? Is that what they’re asking? Or, are they asking if those who wear the uniform, those who willingly comply, those who follow the narrative are more worth saving than those who don’t. Never mind that obesity is the number one co-morbidity.


    I was at Wal-Mart the other day (I know, I know, but I needed butterfly bandages and it was the only place open) and observed a woman who was so obese she couldn’t walk. She had one of those carts to get around and in that cart were non-food items that taste good to her and definitely contributed to her obesity. But, she was wearing a d*** mask.

    Meanwhile, my family takes responsibility for our health. We’re all very healthy, none of us are on any kind of prescribed medication, we spend the extra money to buy fresh veggies and fruit and grass-fed beef (organic, too, when we have the option). We are active and fit. We are clean. We respect people’s “bubbles” and stay 6 feet away. We aren’t clogging up the medical system because we have no reason to be there. But, we don’t wear the d*** masks.

    I ask you to read what the media is asking because it’s only a question now, but they want it to be an edict: If you don’t comply, your life isn’t worth saving. Period.

    Legislators, please take this seriously and stop this madness.

  • Informed Consent

    CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted and decided that US “front-line workers, like doctors, nurses and support staff, are the top priority, as well as those living and working in nursing homes.” We should be alarmed that the mRNA COVID vaccines being administered in the USA, to our frontline workers, will be the first mRNA vaccine to be administered to humans? That our frontline workers and our most vulnerable population, our fragile elderly will BE the long-term safety study for the COVID-19 vaccine? AKA Coerced human experimentation. This brand new, fast-tracked mRNA vaccine they are receiving is designed to lessen symptoms, not prevent the transmission of COVID!

    “Seen in the context of just how much information we don’t know or have at this stage, it’s not clear to us why those of us who are asking for more information about the current crop of COVID vaccines under development are so marginalized and ridiculed.
    We’re simply exercising our right to informed consent.”

    – Rob Verkerk Ph. D (article quote from childrenshealthdefense.org)

    ❓Will the residents of the Longterm Care Facilities (LTC) be given #InformedConsent?

    ❓Will LTC residents be told that the subjects in the Moderna & the Pfizer trials were all healthy & that the vaccines were NOT tested on immunocompromised subjects?

    ❓Will Healthcare Professionals (HCP) be given #InformedConsent or will they be coerced into receiving the vaccine?

    ❓Will HCP be screened by their employers prior to administration of the COVID vaccine? Will they be forced to disclose private medical information, like an underlying health condition, to their employers?

    ❓Will the LTC facility residents & HCP be advised of the possible side-effects of the COVID vaccine? The likelihood of side effects were acknowledged by ACIP yesterday.

    The committee discussed that the vaccine should be methodically administered in healthcare facilities to avoid an entire ward or entire team of HCP falling ill simultaneously.

    ❓Will the LTC residents & HCP be advised that the brand new, fast-tracked mRNA vaccine they are receiving is designed to lessen symptoms, not prevent the transmission of COVID?

    ❓Do you find it alarming that the first targets of the COVID vaccination were not part of the clinical trials (those with underlying/co-morbid conditions/immunocompromised)?

    ❓Do you find it alarming that most #Americans believe that the first COVID vaccines being offered will “protect” them from contracting COVID?

    ❓Do you find it alarming that the mRNA vaccines being given EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) may create asymptomatic carriers of COVID, placing others at risk? Check out this video: https://youtu.be/fM9D80-Zb4s

    ❓Are you alarmed that the mRNA COVID vaccines being administered in the USA, to our frontline workers, will be the first mRNA vaccine to be administered to humans? That our frontline workers and our most vulnerable population, our fragile elderly will BE the long-term safety study for the COVID-19 vaccine? Please share this post, engage peers in conversations about this vaccine being offered in the USA. Empower peers to make informed medical decisions on behalf of themselves & their family members. Jack Ciattarelli

    Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us

    BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037 (Published 21 October 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4037

    Keep asking questions.

    Keep doing the research.

    Your health is important and your life matters. Don’t let the criticism or ridicule from others stop you from fighting for the truth. We empower you to put aside the politics and make the decision that brings you peace.

    It will be worth it.

    #askquestions

    #fightforthetruth

    #beempowered

    #1986theact

  • Central Health District Meeting the Unanswered Questions

    On December 4, the Central District Board of Health voted to postpone their vote that would attach fines and imprisonment to their health orders that limit travel, gatherings, and force masks on every man, woman, and children over the age of 2.

    Much of the virtual meeting was the discussion of doom and gloom and was closed to all but 11 in-person citizens. The other 400 individuals stood shivering outside in the cold while more than 1,200 watched the live stream on YouTube.

    The health representatives said their model predicted by Christmas hospitals will be too full of patients, and that some people might have to be moved to overflow rooms such as meeting rooms and classrooms.

    The numbers are high, the beds are all full but…they don’t want to cause a panic.

    Questions that remained unanswered…

    At last Tuesday’s Central District Health board meeting (CDH), it was admitted that half of the virus patients in Ada County hospitals are from outside Ada County. Half. The Ada County hospitals are not filled with Ada County residents. 

    How will an iron-fisted health order imposed upon Ada County residents change the fact that half of the virus patients are from outside the county? (see the figures below on hospitalization for the district)

    Also shared at the CHD meeting on December 1: outbreaks in nursing homes continue. 

    After 8 months of this virus, nursing homes still cannot contain the virus and/or keep it from spreading in their facilities. Why? Why are nursing homes still having infection control issues? How will a draconian order upon Ada County residents who freely move through the community help reduce the long-term care facilities? Shouldn’t the efforts be focused on educating and overseeing the nursing home staff to ensure they are exercising proper infection control procedures? How is it Ada County residents’ fault that the nursing homes aren’t doing a good job protecting their residents?

    Where is the proof that those who live mask-free are spreading the disease? Look around the grocery stores, Lowe’s, Wal-Mart, etc. where nearly everyone is wearing a face mask. Where exactly are the people supposedly not wearing face masks? All of these stores require them. For the one out of 15 people who refuse to wear a mask, show us the data that reveals that a few people not wearing face masks is causing the virus to spread in Ada County.

    Where is the data/science that proves wearing a face mask outdoors stops the spread of this virus? Outdoor face mask use is nothing more than a frantic response; there isn’t one place in the world that has data that shows face masks worn outside stop the spread of this virus.

    If you are true leaders, you will work with all facets of the community to creatively find ways to address this problem, without resorting to coercion.

    400 People Show Up. Thousands of Citizens Email and Watch Meeting Live.

    “After hours of discussion, the meeting ended with a huge win for the people and for LIBERTY tonight at Central District Health. Freedom wins today. All political power is in the people!” said Executive Director Sarah Clendendon.

    Officers, Do You Remember Your Oath?

    As a reminder to the Boise Police Department, your sworn promise is important and is not just words; it is an oath you swore to uphold. Keep that always at the forefront of your mind:

    “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same: that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    Haven’t Hospitals Been Balancing Patients for Decades?

    A nurse commented: Hospitals have been full for decades. Balancing census has always been something nursing supervisors have to do. I worked in ICU and several other floors. We were constantly having to juggle patients, keep patients in ER because there were no beds available, divert traumas because we were full… a day in the life of any busy hospital. That was 20 years ago and has nothing to do with COVID. Also, never in the history of hospitals have nurses “responded immediately” to a call light. We’re ALWAYS overworked and crazy busy. Again, nothing to do with COVID. These doctors need to stop with the dramatics.

    What do the numbers show?

    Transparency is so important. At the time of this article, there are 242 out of 544,234 people in the district who are hospitalized with a positive COVID test according to St. Luke’s and St. Alphonsus’s websites. The 151 ICU beds available are full.

    We have almost 2 million people in the state of Idaho and 8 months to prepare – WHY have the hospitals not taken the millions of dollars to increase the ICU bed count?!

    Please explain to me the following…
    1. Why do we only have 151 ICU beds in the whole State!
    2. How do we shut down the whole State and claim we will be overrun with a projection of -4 beds at the peak? All they have to do is open a wing to accommodate or put the in the empty ER.
    Not to mention they have had 9 months to prepare.

    St Alphonsus

    A total of 397 people are in the hospital right now. 95 people out of the 544,234 people living in the Central District who are at St. Al’s hospitals have a positive COVID test. This does not mean there are 95 people in ICU admitted because of COVID. Every person admitted to the hospital must be tested. (Concerns about false positives in testing)

    *ICU beds were mentioned numerous times at the meeting. These figures aren’t available to the public on this website: https://www.saintalphonsus.org/coronavirus/stats

    All patients must be tested and a positive test does not mean that they were admitted because of COVID.

    All patients must be tested and a positive test does NOT mean that they were admitted BECAUSE of COVID.

    St. Lukes

    147 people out the 544,234 people living in the Central District are in St. Luke hospitals right now with a positive COVID test. This does not mean that there are 95 people in ICU admitted because of COVID. Every person admitted must be tested.*ICU beds were mentioned numerous times at the meeting. These figures aren’t available to the public on this website: https://www.stlukesonline.org/health-services/service-groups/covid-resources/covid-data-and-reporting

    What’s the Survival Rate?

    Are these masks really working?

    We masked up our children to go to school even though the risk of severe illness is equivalent to their chance of being struck by lightning.
    We masked up our hospital workers – constantly exposed and yet still testing positive and asymptomatic, unable to work for several weeks.
    We masked up our elderly and medically fragile – and yet they are suffering the highest mortality rate trapped in isolation in long-term care facilities.

    Is it possible that the mask theory isn’t working?
    CDC says 80% of those with COVID wore masks.

     If masks worked then why are they shutting everything down again??

    Where is the science on masks preventing the spread? You have big cities that have already tried this, mandating masks and fining people. The cities that have done this are still having mass spread. Stay home orders and mask mandates have not worked. Keep the vulnerable home, eat healthy take vitamin D, etc. The focus should be on health and I’m not hearing about that at all! – says a Facebook commenter

    Another commenter posted on Facebook: You can have compassion and care about others but not agree with the mask mandate. There is highly regarded scientific evidence that supports opening up and dumping the masks.

    I think we should have the freedom to choose. If you have underlying conditions and fear this virus, then why are you outside when there are options for you to purchase groceries online, renew and pay bills online etc.? If we choose to live life and not live in fear, then it is our right to do so. Those that want to wear masks, wear them. If you don’t, then don’t.

    The hospitals are full and you feel your position requires you to ‘do something.’ Here is a list of suggestions that are productive – not coercive.

    • Acquire, bring together, and advertise a list of area doctors who are able to treat Covid patients at home with proven protocols to prevent hospital admissions. 
    • Create a mobile health unit of area doctors and nurses who will make house calls. There are several successful at-home and outpatient clinic treatments available.
    • Encourage the community to protect and uplift the vulnerable, instead of shaming the maskless.
    • Do you realize there are people with valid medical exemptions to wearing masks who are refused service at stores? This is your fault! What about rape victims who have PTSD or those suffering from asthma? What about their health?

    If your only solution is to COERCE then you are not a leader, but rather a tyrant.   

    Are the COVID statistics padded?

    Are they reporting numbers just for COVID-19 or are they padding it with flu and pneumonia (a different virus that tends to be more prevalent in the colder months)?

    Idaho deaths

    2018: 235 (flu) + 900 (Chronic lower respiratory diseases). In real life, 2018 was an equivalent or even higher respiratory death rate year in Idaho.

    Keep in mind, COVID deaths which now incorporate flu, pneumonia, and anyone who tests positive (even if the death was from another cause).
    Financial incentives keep the COVID tracking code on the death certificates. (see below)

    One commenter posted: “Will shutting down businesses instilling masks and social distancing fines and imprisonment take actually curtail the viral spread? You guys aren’t answering that question. There’s a lot on the line for everyone in our society. We’re hearing how you guys are at your neck in the water but we’re not hearing how taking this advisory to enforcement will help…“

    “Behave or we will be forced to punish you.” What gave you the idea that your posses that power?

    One of the commissioners tweeted that people need to have compassion for one another – and their need to punish people for not complying.

    One commenter responded:
    What about the people losing their jobs and businesses. Where is the dire concern for these people?

    One citizen suggested: You don’t get to punish people for not wearing a mask. Educate them. Tell them how and why it works. People will help. Stop relying on the government to make sure people comply. Mandating is not the answer.

    Another commenter posted during the live stream:

    The reason so many gave up their rights – their businesses – is to save lives. Now, this guy is saying it isn’t about mortality. Homeless are denied shelter and left to sleep in the cold due to these stupid policies. The elderly are held captive in their nursing homes against their will. People are dying due to your policies to protect others from suffering.

    Protecting Our Healthcare Workers or Making it Worse?

    Are you actually taking out staff that aren’t symptomatic by testing them and forcing quarantine? Are you considering allowing those who test positive and have no symptoms the opportunity to work with COVID-positive patients since the risk of contamination isn’t an issue?

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/covi-dpositive-hospital-employees-can-work-amid-staff-shortages-north-dakota-governor-says-234325339.html

    Should hospital workers be mandated to get the flu vaccine when flu vaccines have been found to increase risk of coronavirus infections? “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference.”

    “Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus(es)”

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1778/455098

    After 10 Months and Millions of Dollars in Federal and State Aid shouldn’t you be prepared by now?

    Idaho Medical Facilities have received a total of $387,454,980 from the Federal Government for COVID patients according to this source: https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/cares-act-provider-relief-fund/data/index.html

    Some of the highest payouts include:

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is funds-for-hospitals-page-001-791x1024.jpg

    This does NOT include the funds received by our long term care facilities.

    In addition, several areas received additional emergency funding according to the CDC data. https://data.cdc.gov/Administrative/Provider-Relief-Fund-COVID-19-High-Impact-Payments/b58h-s9zx

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Provider-Relief-Fund-COVID-19-High-Impact-Payments-Data-Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-1-1.png
    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Provider-Relief-Fund-COVID-19-High-Impact-Payments-Data-Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-2-1-1024x97.png

    St Lukes receiving two very large payouts for its medical centers in Twin Falls and Ketchum.

    Idaho Coronavirus Finance Committee Approves $5 Million For Contract Nurses

    Is the Coronavirus Finance Committee – an executive branch designated committee? According to the Idaho State Constitution, it is the job of the Legislature to determine and to allocate the budget – NOT an executive committee.

    https://www.boisestatepublicradio.org/post/idaho-coronavirus-finance-committee-approves-5-million-contract-nurses#stream/0

    Are You Listening to the Public?

    Unproven mask mandates on citizens with violations including fines and imprisonment aren’t the answer. You can’t arrest and fine people out of a ‘pandemic’. The people are weary of continually being fed the line of fear and doom. Their livelihoods crushed by policies that haven’t proven to ‘stop the spread’. The risk is highest for our elderly. The focus should be on protecting them not subjecting the entire population to draconian measures that haven’t proven to be effective in anything but creating a loss of income and increase of depression and suicide.

     The essence of community, family, and individual health is not only physical, but equally mental, spiritual, and psychological.  There are some things worse than death and illness!  For example, a hospital patient or nursing home resident who has to die ALONE without family by their side to say goodbye.  

    By turning a health advisory into an “order” you cross the line of human decency.  If you are true leaders, you will work with all facets of the community to creatively find ways to address this problem, without resorting to coercion.  

    For example, I have suggested several times to Governor Little that he include ALL facets of the medical profession on his COVID task force, to include DO’s, naturopaths, chiropractors, psychologists, etc (rather than only traditional medical doctors and hospital CEO’s), with no effect.  I have sent numerous emails with scientific documentation to our area’s health district (EIPH), with no effect.  Idahoans expect better leadership – this is your opportunity to rise to the occasion! 

  • Central Health Demands Small Biz Hire Enforcers

    There is a lot to loathe about the CDH revised orders that will be voted on this Tuesday.

    This is a disgusting violation of rights on so many levels. I would like to draw your attention to the 2 I have circled in red.

    Hey small businesses owners of bars and nightclubs 🗣 are you prepared to hire security especially in this market where you are working harder than ever just to keep your doors open❓

    Now take a look at #12. If we don’t comply with this tyranny, including paying someone to enforce these draconian measures purposed by the board, then we can be fined or imprisoned. 😡

    Is this what you signed up for as an entrepreneur?

    Did you hope that one day you could pay someone to be the enforcers of tyranny? As an entrepreneur myself, this is NOT what I signed up for. This must not be tolerated.

    Show up on Tues at 5:15 pm at CDH. Bring your noisemakers and your friends. Contact the small business owners in Ada, Boise, Elmore, and Valley counties and educate them about how this will impact them if allowed to pass.

    Email the board and let them know that you expect them to vote NO on this order that puts an undue burden on small businesses.

    Emails must be received by Mon at 5:15 pm so don’t delay.

    Ted.Epperly@FMRIdaho.org,
    dlachiondo@adacounty.id.gov,
    lach4ada@gmail.com,
    rduke@cdh.idaho.gov,
    rstirm@co.boise.id.us,
    MBlanksma@house.idaho.gov,
    jmatblank@hotmail.com,
    ba-nettleton@hotmail.com,
    ehasbrouck@co.valley.id.us,
    jane@fhcboise.com,
    boh@cdh.idaho.gov