SJR101 and S1017 grants authority to an unelected federal alphabet soup bureaucracy over drug policy in the state. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
At least one Republican Senator, Christy Zito (Hammett), spoke against the measure. Zito said that the legislature can’t legislate temperance and morality but said she is personally against using recreational drugs.
Zito went on to say,
I just think that as we approach this, we need to be careful that we honor the choice of the individual, that we are careful not to combine policy with [the] constitution.
Senator Christy Zito
Sen. C. Scott Grow (R-Eagle) the bill’s sponsor said the measure was necessary to protect Idaho’s families. Grow listed off a number of reasons he is bringing the proposal forward.
This proposes an amendment to the Idaho Constitution prohibiting the production, manufacture, transportation, sale, delivery, dispensing, distribution, possession, or use of certain psychoactive drugs.
Grow listed as one of the reasons,
This amendment will allow Idahoans to choose for themselves whether they want to live in a drug-free state, free from drug culture, or not.
Senator C. Scott Grow
Grow continued with seven total reasons and said that burdens and risks to law enforcement. Grow addressed a number of questions in his opening statement, including saying that having the FDA listed in the amendment is not a concern.
Grow also said that CBD oil would not be illegal under SJR 101 citing several attorneys he had spoken to. (read more here: Idaho Dispatch )
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
Keep in mind that this is a constitutional amendment so the legislature is voting whether or not to add this to the ballot for voters.
What they don’t tell you is that the explanation of the issue on the ballot is essentially a commercial for the way they want you to vote. You would think that the information on the ballot would weigh out the pros and cons in such a way that the people, (with a pencil in hand) could make an educated vote, but it doesn’t.
This is how we got stuck with Medicaid expansion that ID cannot afford. Why would we change our Constitution to say psychoactive drugs are never allowed in ID unless the FDA says so?
Shouldn’t Idahoans have the opportunity to consider what is best for our great state?
What this amendment says is if the FDA says they want to have a “documented clinical investigation” using psychoactive drugs (Page 2 lines 9 & 10) on Idahoans, that’s ok.
But, if someone fighting cancer needs to use it medicinally that’s not ok?!? If passed, the amendment would effectively and permanently close the door for marijuana legalization via citizen’s ballot initiative.
Absolute waste of time, money, and resources. We should be focusing on keeping this state free instead of fueling the pockets of big pharma and changing the constitution to make something “more” illegal than it already is. You are punishing veterans and others who need medical marijuana and any other medications in the future to combat continuing pain.
Facebook Comment against SJR101
We need to keep the federal government from dictating what is good for Idahoans! Let’s keep Idaho sovereign.
Another federal supremacy bill. This bill mirrors the FDA controlled substances scheduling and rescheduling decisions for 2020 including placing synthetic cannabinoids in schedule 1 while placing opiates in schedule 2. Idahoans should be making decisions for ID. Period.
***The 10th Amendment to the US Constitution says, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Let’s remind our senators of the 10th amendment and tell them to vote NO on S1017.
Senate email list https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-senate-email-list/. ***This bill will likely be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow.
We have good news from the Idaho State Capitol. It is being reported that the House and Senate floors were fully open to the people. There was no social distancing, mask requirement, or taped off chairs. Good work!
Please send a ‘thank you’ and ask that they continue to make the people’s house open to the public, as it should be.
The senate promised you during the special session that they would END Brad Little’s the State Of Emergency. Here are the details of the Governor’s 300-day emergency orders. NOW is the time to hold them accountable to that promise.
30+ Legislators are working on protecting freedom, restoring liberty in our state. SUPPORT THEM! “Ask your legislator for a copy of the agenda. If your legislator says they don’t know what it is…tell them they ‘missed the boat and they need to be on it!” – Rep Ron NateWhat does this have to do with health freedom? See the third line from the bottom!!
Activism is most effective when it includes persistent, committed efforts by knowledgeable engaged citizens. Most people have a very specific vision of what it means to be an activist. They may envision protests, sit-ins, or demonstrations. This “old school” version of activism is being transformed and enhanced by technology, globalization, and the ever-increasing accessibility of information. Were you an activist in your former state? While our states have similar structures each state has its own unique legislative environment and likely requires a different approach to affect change. Understanding the processes and procedures will help you become effective in protecting your liberty.
Activism 101: with Senator Christy Zito, Representative Heather Scott, IFAA Executive Director Greg Pruitt | Hosted by Executive Directors Miste Karlfeldt & Sarah Clendenon
Let your activism become part of your political participation. While you advocate for an issue be sure to hold your representatives accountable to listen to your opinion. Ensure your elected officials are representing you by voting for candidates that stand up for what you believe in. Learn more about how to make this possible with our virtual Activism 101 class.
HFI Day at the Capitol guided tours January 18, 2021 1:30 pm, 3:00 pm
Join the p.m. Tours hosted by Health Freedom Idaho. Meet HFI leaders on the first floor main Rotunda (center of the building). Get a feel for where the committee hearing rooms are and ask all your questions about the bill process!
This is another great opportunity to meet like-minded liberty-loving friends, tour the state Capitol to know where you need to go during sessions, and learn/reacquaint yourself with the Idaho government (government 101 class!). If you are new to Idaho, this is also the perfect opportunity for you to connect and learn! This event is kid-friendly and many homeschool parents have found this event to be very informative in the past!
We all know that the end game of the pandemic is global vaccination. We were promised that by our Governor at the very onset of his take over of the Government and shut down of the state. Members of Health Freedom Idaho are invited to join and participate in a live discussion of health freedom in Idaho.
Jan 14 @ 7 pm Live ONLINE
MEMBERS WILL RECEIVE A SPECIAL INVITE BY EMAIL! Look for it on Friday night!
The burning question: How do we reconcile private property rights and civil liberties?
On any given day at any given moment, I can debate both sides of this argument. I have been driving myself batty debating myself in my brain. I decided to reach out to a few friends for a healthy discussion on this topic, hoping to find some peace by planting my feet firmly on principle. After these discussions and considering their points, I found that it sounded much like the debate I was already having with myself.
I’ll share these points with you and then tell you where I finally ended up and why I feel more passionate than ever that we can both support small businesses and also stand tall in the freedom of our civil liberties.
Private Property Rights
Remember the baker who didn’t want to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple? Patriots were frustrated by the supreme court ruling. They believed that business owners should be able to refuse service. If we stand on the liberty that private property rights support, then the same thing can be said for business owners requiring masks.
Some business owners see an unmasked face as a threat to their business and customers, and while some may not agree that a “bare face” is a threat, the business owner’s rights to protect their business should not be denied.
My question became, “Do private property rights usurp my religious freedom and right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?”
As a Christian, I believe the Bible when it says that I am made in the image of God. Given that, I believe it is my religious right to shine that image to the world. I believe that He breathed the breath of life into humanity which should not be hindered.
I certainly would not feel happy nor free to wear a mask, which science shows me is detrimental to my health. I have a vascular, autoimmune disease, so it is definitely not in my best interest to breathe in my own pathogens and carbon dioxide.
This condition leads me to research public places of accommodation. A public place of accommodation is a place that offers goods and services to the general public, such as a restaurant that is open to the public. Federal and state laws protect designated groups from discrimination in places of public accommodations, based on the premise that everyone is entitled to enjoy the public accommodation’s goods and services on an equal basis. https://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/public accommodations-equal-rights.html
If a public place of accommodation can not discriminate, are they discriminating against me if I don’t want to wear a mask?
With the CDC, FDA, ADA, and OSHA coming together in unison where does that leave civil liberties?
The sooner we stop relying on the government to ‘give us our rights‘, the sooner we will know what it is like to be free. When you give up your liberties to the government, they always come back to you in a smaller package and eventually will be taken from you. Stop giving them up in the first place, and maybe we can avoid these debacles.
So how did I finally reconcile that businesses should stand up for their private property rights while those of us who want to live mask free stand up for our civil liberties?
As I drilled down to the heart of our current problem, it became clear who is at fault for this frustration in our free market. Did we ever see business owners force mask-wearing during flu season, for example? No! That’s because they want to stay open, make a living, and feed their families like the rest of us.
Our elected government has interfered with private property rights and has ultimately driven a shaft into the spokes of the wheels of capitalism. The globalist’s best dream would be for the private citizen to turn against small businesses and further assault their private property rights by attacking them for following the government’s unconstitutional edicts.
In my opinion, it is better to support the small business owner by educating them about their rights and standing with them when the “mask police” come knocking. We can use the sad and limping remainder of our free market to push back on this global reset by locking arms with fellow liberty-loving business owners by purchasing their goods and services.
At the same time, we must hold our elected accountable.
The governor declared the state of emergency when the numbers clearly show there is no pandemic. Let’s not forget that he has the ability to rescind the state of emergency.
The legislature should hold him accountable for spending money he does not have the right to spend, and for creating a law he had no right to create. He should be impeached, which they can do by passing Articles of Impeachment. The legislature can also cut funding to the board which seems to me like an appropriate request of your representative.
It is our boards of health that have way too much authority given to them in 39-414. HFI will bring a bill this legislative session to give power back to the people, and the citizens must rally in their cry for its hearing and passage.
Educate and SUPPORT Small Business
They also have the comfort of knowing they can defy the orders and afford to pay any fines that come their way while the small businesses can not. It’s the small business owners who are desperate to keep their doors open that need education and support. In my opinion, we need to educate, build relationships, and stand with the small business owners while holding the elected accountable. Let’s not forget that it is the elected, beginning with Governor Little declaring the State of Emergency.
Now the district health departments unlawfully create mandates that have created an authoritarian nightmare. It is counterproductive for us to punish the business owner who is desperate to make sure they can feed their families and keep the lights.
Capitalism Works
I witnessed the free market at work on Black Friday. The wineries that I attempted to visit in Garden City required masks and were empty, while Caldwell’s wineries do not require masks and had plenty of business. Guess who got my money?
I made sure to visit three of my favorite wineries in Garden City just so that they had to tell me of their mask policy and deny me entry. I kindly educated them but firmly stood my ground. I want these business owners to feel the sting of losing business and give them a clue as to why their rooms are empty. Maybe they will see that Caldwell wineries are thriving, and if they want to be able to pay their bills they will loosen their mask requirements.
Boise’s streets felt like a ghost town on what should have been one of the biggest shopping days of the year, while the Nampa streets were packed with cars trying to park at the shopping centers. Interestingly enough, shoppers were wearing masks for the most part, but they are still choosing to spend their money in a town that is not requiring them.
I would like to see us continue to support businesses and cities that stand for liberty. Nothing we say will speak as loudly as the dollars we spend. Divide and conquer is a historically effective tactic that I hope we don’t fall prey to. Let’s unite with small businesses who will stand against the authoritarian dictators who wish to restrict them with mandates that will eventually cause them to close their doors.
Let’s financially support small businesses that will defend our civil liberties by purchasing our goods and services through them, giving capitalism a chance to right the wrongs thrust upon us by an overreaching government. Let’s educate the police and ask them to hold to their oath and defend the constitution. Let’s hold our elected accountable and demand change.
Educate our Police, Sheriff and Community
We can also educate our police and sheriff departments. They are supporting only one set of laws, and we the people must educate them.
Many of us have spent time genuinely educating the small businesses that are important to our daily lives. The Target, Walgreens, and Costcos of the world don’t care about our rights. They are happy to participate in the tyranny because they will ultimately benefit as the small businesses crumble under the boot’s weight on their neck.
Idaho Code and Constitutional Guarantees
Pursuant to 46-1008 (2):
“No state of disaster emergency may continue for longer than thirty (30) days unless the governor finds that it should be continued for another thirty (30) days or any part thereof. “
The Governor has written extensions to the State of Emergency for 9 months, far longer than the statutorily allowable 60 days. Does this make all orders based on an ’emergency’ void after the 60th day?
The Idaho Constitution details certain human rights, which are protected in our Republic:
INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF MAN. All men are by nature free and equal and have certain inalienable rights, among which are enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; pursuing happiness, and securing safety.
POLITICAL POWER INHERENT IN THE PEOPLE. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their equal protection and benefit…
GUARANTY OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY. The exercise and enjoyment of religious faith and worship shall forever be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions….. No person shall be required to attend or support any ministry or place of worship, religious sect or denomination, or pay tithes against his consent; nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship…
RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY. The people shall have the right to assemble in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good; to instruct their representatives, and to petition the legislature for the redress of grievances.
UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES PROHIBITED. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated…
RESERVED RIGHTS NOT IMPAIRED. This enumeration of rights shall not be construed to impair or deny other rights retained by the people.
Idaho Code 39-9003 Health Freedom Act:
(2) It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty.
(3) The policy stated herein shall not be applied to impair any right of contract related to the provision of health care services to any person or group.
Idaho Code 39-9004:
ENFORCEMENT.(1) No public official, employee, or agent of the state of Idaho or any of its political subdivisions, shall act to impose, collect, enforce, or effectuate any penalty in the state of Idaho that violates the public policy set forth in section 39-9003(2), Idaho Code.The attorney general shall take such action as is provided in section 67-1401(15), Idaho Code, in the defense or prosecution of rights protected under this act.
Pfizer’s 53 page Covid-19 vaccine document released in December states that the VACCINE DOES NOT prevent Covid-19 infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required. Hospitals are reporting adverse reactions to the vaccine upon administration.
One hospital in Chicago stopped the vaccination program after several workers had adverse events. A hospital in Alaska is reporting their 4th serious adverse reaction to vaccination out of 144 healthcare workers who received it. A Philadelphia hospital had a nurse manager pass out on camera just 17 minutes after being administered the vaccine.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got Covid-19 during the study, almost half were from the vaccinated group. The vaccine did not prevent infection!
ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINATION
In the past week, as the vaccine has been initially distributed the mainstream media reported numberous serious adverse reactions from our frontline healthcare workers. In an effort to contain this significant news the CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system.
Do you realize what this means?
You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating, or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.
Allergic Reactions Reported
“Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said at a press conference that the allergic reactions had been reported in more than one state, including in Alaska. Marks also said that a chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG) that is an ingredient in the Pfizer vaccine – as well as the Moderna Inc vaccine authorized on Friday – “could be the culprit” causing the reactions. Marks said that allergic reactions to PEG could be somewhat more common than previously understood.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-fda-idUSKBN28T05J
CDC SURVEILLANCE OF ADVERSE REACTIONS TO COVID -19 Vaccine
First report on adverse reactions to COVID19 vaccines. ACIP December 19 and 20, 2020 Presentation Slides | Immunization Practices | CDC http://ow.ly/qAWd30rpndH
CDC Assures Public that Vaccine Reactions will be Recorded
“As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC
Keep in mind, that any medical bills and long term health issues requiring medical intervention will be entirely your responsibility.
FDA – Vaccine SIDE EFFECTS
Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, let us point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀 https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.
100 FOLD INCREASE IN VACCINE REACTIONS REPORTED WHEN IT WAS AUTOMATED
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after the release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
Guillain-Barré syndrome– Weakness and tingling in your extremities are usually the first symptoms. These sensations can quickly spread, eventually paralyzing your whole body.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis – widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord.
Transverse myelitis – muscle weakness, paralysis, sensory problems, or bladder and bowel dysfunction
Encephalitis – cause confused thinking, seizures, or problems with senses or movement. Rarely, encephalitis can be life-threatening.
Myelitis/encephalomyelitis/ – rare kind of inflammation that affects the brain and spinal cord, usually in children
Meningoencephalitis/meningitis/ – acute inflammation of the protective membranes covering the brain and spinal cord, known collectively as the meninges
Encephalopathy – means damage or disease that affects the brain
Convulsions/seizures – a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain. It can cause changes in your behavior, movements or feelings, and in levels of consciousness.
Stroke –when blood supply to part of your brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients. Within minutes, brain cells begin to die. A stroke is a medical emergency.
Narcolepsy and cataplexy-a chronic sleep disorder characterized by overwhelming daytime drowsiness and sudden attacks of sleep.
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.
COVID VACCINE TRIAL DATA
Certainly these 95%+ effective vaccines are safe!? Well let’s take a look at the participants qualifications and adverse event reporting.
-45 participants age 18-55 -20 participants age 56-70 -20 participants age 71 or older -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
Relying on a Vaccine is Folly. The best defense is supporting the immune system.
Dr. Nancy Welliver, summed up the issues with vaccines very nicely:“Because of the ability of viruses to quickly and continuously adapt, the odds of us meeting, as a species, novel viruses is infinitely high. This is why relying on immunizations is folly, and providing good lifestyle-based medicine is the best course.
… the virus will have hit the susceptible hosts, and will probably have mutated, making the immunization fairly ineffective, as we have seen with successive years of flu immunization. Promoting a healthy immune system is the best defense.”
Perhaps a publicity stunt gone wrong. The CHI Memorial Hospital in Tennessee broadcasts vaccinating several members of their healthcare management teams. During our live stream of the drug injections at CHI Memorial, Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover while speaking to the media about receiving the drug injection mentioned she started feeling dizzy. SHE FAINTED 17 minutes AFTER SHOOTING UP. Thankfully one of the doctors behind her caught her.
A SECOND Alaska healthcare worker has an allergic reaction to Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine just one day after another staff member at the same hospital went into anaphylactic shock.
Anaphylactic shock is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction to an allergy from food, medicine, vaccine or even a type of material.
The immune system releases chemicals that flood the body, blood pressure suddenly drops, and airways narrow, which prevents someone from breathing normally.
Symptoms usually occur within minutes and include hives, a weak pulse, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and a swollen tongue or throat.
A second healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered an allergic reaction after getting Pfizer Inc’s coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday.
He experienced symptoms such as eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat, which resolved in an hour after being given Benadryl. His reaction was less serious than another healthcare worker from the same hospital who went into anaphylactic shock on Tuesday.
She is currently hospitalized and it is unclear when she will be discharged. The woman hasno known history of allergies.
Dec 18 updated:
to reveal now a THIRD significant reaction
So this unfortunate soul went to get a medical product injected into their body to SUPPOSEDLY “prevent” them from getting a medical issue only to GET A MEDICAL ISSUE. Oh, and what guarantee do they have that they’re protected? ZERO guarantees!! Fairtrade?
I wonder how many of these instances are occurring that are NOT making it into mainstream media reporting? Hmm.
By the way, wait until this Covid vaccine victim finds out that whatever medical bills they are incurring to address this crisis ARE NOT COVERED by the medical professional that administered the vaccine, the vaccine maker, or the government agency that suggested getting the shot was a good idea!
The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered. It led the U.K.’s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine.
What’s in the Vaccine causing allergic reactions?
After the reactions, the U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a warning that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not be given the vaccine.
About 32 million Americans have food allergies, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. It’s unknown how many have drug allergies.
No such warning has been issued in the U.S.
In fact, last weekend, the CDC said Americans with serious allergies can be immunized as long as they are monitored for 30 minutes after getting the shot.
However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requiring Pfizer to monitor for anaphylaxis in the U.S. and submit data, according to The New York Times, which first reported the reaction. *So this first wave of vaccine recipients are our most valuable healthcare workers and also participating in safety trials.
The agency has also advised people with allergies to consult with their physicians to ensure they are not allergic to any components of the vaccine.
All right folks, be sure to tell your doctor if you have had an allergic reaction to an injection of the following...
Adverse Reactions Will Determine if the Vaccine is Safe
The CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system. Do you realize what this means?
You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.
Perhaps that’s why some healthcare workers are FAKING injections.
“As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC
Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, I would like to point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀 https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna Covid 19 vaccine…
-45 participants age 18-55 -20 participants age 56-70 -20 participants age 71 or older -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
The Boise Health Department answers the question we all keep asking since March – when will all these restrictions be over? Ted Epperly, MD & Board Member of Central District Health said in their meeting on December 15th: Idaho is currently at 85-90 positive cases per 100,000 people. In order for CDH to remove/withdraw mask mandates and restrictions on gatherings, we need to be down below 2 per 100,000…That’s less than 33 positive cases in all of Idaho.
<< We have 1.65 million people here in Idaho. Divide by 100,000, times 2.33 cases. >>
Let’s just pretend we’re talking about the Flu. Saying we need to have less than 2 cases per 100,000 people is like saying we should have mask mandates if we don’t have less than 6,400 cases of Flu in the US.
Do you know how many cases of Flu there are in the US each year?
Let’s just pretend we have 90 cases of Flu per 100,000 people in the US (that’s currently where we are at with C0VlD in Idaho), that would be 288,000 cases of Flu in the entire country. Ok great.
Now let’s look at REALITY (with Flu Vaccines Available)
During the 2017 – 2018 Flu Season, CDC estimates there were between 9.3 to 45 MILLION cases of Flu in the US.
Does Central District Health really want less than 2 cases per 100,000? This Doctor can’t be serious! If he is serious, Idaho will NEVER be done with a mask mandate. None of this is scientific or reasonable. It’s a completely asinine and unobtainable requirement. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
At an emergency board meeting today, the Board of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare approved a temporary administrative rule that allows for the timely activation of crisis standards of care during a pandemic, natural disaster. or other emergency that is overwhelming Idaho’s healthcare system.
There was NO PUBLIC NOTICE of this emergency meeting and the vote did not involve the public.
According to the Health and Welfare Website: “Crisis standards of care are guidelines that help healthcare providers and healthcare systems decide how to deliver the best care possible under the extraordinary circumstances of a disaster. Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines would be used when resources are insufficient to provide the usual standard of care to people who need it.
Directory of the Health Department (NOT a medical doctor) Determines Priority of Medical Treatment
Under the rules approved by the board Friday, in the event there’s an emergency that makes health care resources scarce, the Department of Health and Welfare director would have a central role in on-the-ground healthcare decision-making. It would be up to him to convene a panel that would decide whether medical facilities could begin rationing care according to a state-approved formula. Members of the panel include representatives of the Idaho Hospital Association, “healthcare entities,” and long-term care facilities. The panel would also include employees of the Department of Health and Welfare, public health districts, and anyone else the director might deem appropriate.https://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/news/board-health-and-welfare-adopts-rule-timely-activation-crisis-standards-care
Idaho Freedom Foundation makes this point:
This unwise decision puts state agencies in the middle of a discussion that could easily be managed by the medical providers themselves. There’s nothing stopping the state’s hospitals, clinics, and individual practitioners from collaborating in an emergency, sharing intel, and resources. The Department of Health and Welfare board, the department, and its director shouldn’t be part of the discussion. They’re not needed. https://idahofreedom.org/crisis-standard-of-care/
Idaho Media asks this question: “Will people who follow COVID-19 rules get priority?
”Stop and really think about that question. Will people who wash their hands and stay 6 feet away from others get priority? Is that what they’re asking? Or, are they asking if those who wear the uniform, those who willingly comply, those who follow the narrative are more worth saving than those who don’t. Never mind that obesity is the number one co-morbidity.
I was at Wal-Mart the other day (I know, I know, but I needed butterfly bandages and it was the only place open) and observed a woman who was so obese she couldn’t walk. She had one of those carts to get around and in that cart were non-food items that taste good to her and definitely contributed to her obesity. But, she was wearing a d*** mask.
Meanwhile, my family takes responsibility for our health. We’re all very healthy, none of us are on any kind of prescribed medication, we spend the extra money to buy fresh veggies and fruit and grass-fed beef (organic, too, when we have the option). We are active and fit. We are clean. We respect people’s “bubbles” and stay 6 feet away. We aren’t clogging up the medical system because we have no reason to be there. But, we don’t wear the d*** masks.
I ask you to read what the media is asking because it’s only a question now, but they want it to be an edict: If you don’t comply, your life isn’t worth saving.Period.
Legislators, please take this seriously and stop this madness.
CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted and decided that US “front-line workers, like doctors, nurses and support staff, are the top priority, as well as those living and working in nursing homes.” We should be alarmed that the mRNA COVID vaccines being administered in the USA, to our frontline workers, will be the first mRNA vaccine to be administered to humans? That our frontline workers and our most vulnerable population, our fragile elderly will BE the long-term safety study for the COVID-19 vaccine? AKA Coerced human experimentation. This brand new, fast-tracked mRNA vaccine they are receiving is designed to lessen symptoms, not prevent the transmission of COVID!
“Seen in the context of just how much information we don’t know or have at this stage, it’s not clear to us why those of us who are asking for more information about the current crop of COVID vaccines under development are so marginalized and ridiculed. We’re simply exercising our right to informed consent.”
Will the residents of the Longterm Care Facilities (LTC) be given #InformedConsent?
Will LTC residents be told that the subjects in the Moderna & the Pfizer trials were all healthy & that the vaccines were NOT tested on immunocompromised subjects?
Will Healthcare Professionals (HCP) be given #InformedConsent or will they be coerced into receiving the vaccine?
Will HCP be screened by their employers prior to administration of the COVID vaccine? Will they be forced to disclose private medical information, like an underlying health condition, to their employers?
Will the LTC facility residents & HCP be advised of the possible side-effects of the COVID vaccine? The likelihood of side effects were acknowledged by ACIP yesterday.
The committee discussed that the vaccine should be methodically administered in healthcare facilities to avoid an entire ward or entire team of HCP falling ill simultaneously.
Will the LTC residents & HCP be advised that the brand new, fast-tracked mRNA vaccine they are receiving is designed to lessen symptoms, not prevent the transmission of COVID?
Do you find it alarming that the first targets of the COVID vaccination were not part of the clinical trials (those with underlying/co-morbid conditions/immunocompromised)?
Do you find it alarming that most #Americans believe that the first COVID vaccines being offered will “protect” them from contracting COVID?
Do you find it alarming that the mRNA vaccines being given EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) may create asymptomatic carriers of COVID, placing others at risk? Check out this video: https://youtu.be/fM9D80-Zb4s
Are you alarmed that the mRNA COVID vaccines being administered in the USA, to our frontline workers, will be the first mRNA vaccine to be administered to humans? That our frontline workers and our most vulnerable population, our fragile elderly will BE the long-term safety study for the COVID-19 vaccine? Please share this post, engage peers in conversations about this vaccine being offered in the USA. Empower peers to make informed medical decisions on behalf of themselves & their family members. Jack Ciattarelli
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us
Your health is important and your life matters. Don’t let the criticism or ridicule from others stop you from fighting for the truth. We empower you to put aside the politics and make the decision that brings you peace.
If passed, the amendment would effectively and permanently close the door for marijuana legalization via citizen’s ballot initiative.
Senate email list https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2021-senate-email-list/. ***This bill will likely be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow. 
https://legislature.idaho.gov/ses…/2021/legislation/S1017
NOW is the time to hold them accountable to that promise.
Saying we need to have less than 2 cases per 100,000 people is like saying we should have mask mandates if we don’t have less than 6,400 cases of Flu in the US.
Will the residents of the Longterm Care Facilities (LTC) be given