Fear is never an acceptable excuse for violating the rights of Americans as a whole. Very soon, people will go from fear to despair to desperation if the economy is not opened back up soon.
We are not protesting social distancing.
We are protesting government overreach and an unnecessary burden on our economy.
We are protesting a citation at a yard sale, held outdoors with more social distancing than Walmart.
We are protesting moms and dads getting handcuffed for playing at parks with their kids.
We are protesting lone fisherman being ticketed for providing food for their families, simply because the boat has a motor.
We are protesting threats of citations given during church service held in a parking lot, each family in their own cars.
We are protesting shopping for clothes at Target & Walmart but not at smaller retailers.
We are protesting the unnecessary closure that is crippling small, seasonal businesses in our state.
We are protesting support group meetings, churches and parks, and playgrounds.
We are protesting the silencing of civilian voices in our democratic process. Don’t get it twisted. We are protesting tyranny, not caution.
Caution is advisable. But we can do that with businesses open. We’re all doing it right now. At gas stations, at grocery stores, anywhere we go in public.
Those who want to protect themselves, can wear masks and gloves and sanitize and disinfect to their heart’s content.
But nobody, not even the government has the right to tell someone else what they have to wear, where they can and can’t go, what they can and can’t buy, etc.
We never agreed to be governed in this manner. And those of us protesting do not intend to start now.
Explain to me how subjugating your fellow man, makes you safer but doesn’t actually MAKE you safer.
Does closing some businesses, magically make people stay 6 feet apart at the stores that are still open? Nope.
Does someone not wearing a mask or gloves, magically nullify your mask or gloves? That’s totally not how PPE works, so no.
Does someone in their car, risk contaminating you, in your car? Also no.
Subjugating our fellow citizens does not actually make anyone safer. It just makes people FEEL safer.
People are losing their rights so others can feel safer… Keep YOURSELF safe. But don’t give up all your rights to the government to do it. Look at other countries. When you want those rights back, you literally may have to die to get them back.
Many states have instituted massive lockdowns (“stay at home” order) of their populations to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Some states have chosen not to do so. The goals of these lockdowns have included the proposition that they would slow the spread of the Coronavirus Sars-Cov-2 virus which causes COVID-19 and thus prevent death.
Is this helping?
One way to look at this would be to compare the COVID-19 deaths in states that do and do not have stay-at-home orders in place. Although these comparisons have their limitations, nonetheless, the statistics speak for themselves and can be used to assess the effectiveness of a lockdown policy.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a serious crisis not to be taken lightly. Our response to it should not make it worse. Martin Dubravec, MD Allergist/Clinical Immunologist Allergy and Asthma Specialists of Cadillac, MI
Dr. Robert Burnett the Director of Surgical Services at Kootenai Health is proposing an alarming violation of medical ethics in his publish opinion post at the Bonner County Daily Bee. He is threatening to withhold treatment from individuals who politically disagree with him. This is extremely unethical and in doing so, likely criminal.
Threatening to withhold health care from anyone, singling out and threatening public officials by directing staff at Kootenai Medical Center and encouraging “all of his co-workers” to ensure care is not provided should be grounds for termination of Burnett and litigation for Burnett and KMC.
“I realize that the pandemic is not much of a concern to those uneducated people who believe this threat is a “hoax” or “overblown,” but I want you to know that in the unlikely but possible event that either you or Sheriff Wheeler contract the coronavirus, and in the less likely event that you will require hospitalization, and even less likely but possible event that you would require a ventilator, that I, and all of my co-workers take comfort in knowing that, because of your behavior, you have essentially relinquished your claim to any of these potentially scare resources. It’s probably for the better that a ventilator go to a health care provider anyway,”
Opinions are opinions but oaths are oaths. I am disgusted at the recent comments made by Dr. Robert Burnett, Director of Surgical Services, Kootenai Heart Health Center. While Burnett is certainly entitled to his own opinions based on his knowledge of medicine, so are Rep. Heather Scott and Sheriff Daryl Wheeler, based on their knowledge of lawmaking and law enforcement. But Burnett put his bloated arrogance on full display as he blatantly violated, in writing, the Hippocratic Oath he took to graduate medical school and become a licensed doctor in Idaho or anywhere in the USA.
Fact: While there is no doubt people are ill and many have died, Coronavirus has proven to be far less deadly than authorities have warned. Moreover, there is debate about whether the virus has been properly identified as Koch’s Postulates, protocols used since the 19th century to identify and determine the pathogenicity of an infectious agent have not been met. Additionally, according to the inventor of the PCR test, the test being used to putatively identify the virus the PCR test cannot be used to diagnose. Although it can identify a minute amount of genetic material such as a virus, it does not prove that that genetic material causes any disease nor that sufficient quantities of that material are present in numbers large enough to cause disease.
Fact: No punch of any sort reached your face. We are all exposed to trillions of bugs in every moment of every day. What determines whether someone falls ill or suffers complications from an illness relates to how well nourished they are, how well-rested, how much stress, whether they exercise. No one touched you and you alone are responsible for taking care of your immune system.
People who disagree about the dangers of coronavirus or any virus are not uneducated simply because they disagree with you.
response by Leslie Manookian Executive Board of Health Freedom Idaho Co Producer of the Greater Good
Corona Virus news. Initially, Physician-directed, hospital-based administration of Intravenous Vitamin C had been marginalized or discredited. Anyone saying that vitamin therapy can stop coronavirus is already being labeled as “promoting false information” and promulgating “fake news.” Even the sharing of verifiable news, and direct quotes from credentialed medical professionals, is being restricted or blocked on social media. The good news – FINALLY – research studies are being approved for high doses of intravenous vitamin C. We all look forward to hearing more as trials progress and very much hope to be hearing of great success with the high dose IVC and liposomal oral treatments!
https://youtu.be/6-elCYFhqJs
(OMNS February 21, 2020) Intravenous vitamin C is already being employed in China against COVID-19 coronavirus. I am receiving regular updates because I am part of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Board to the International Intravenous Vitamin C China Epidemic Medical Support Team. Its director is Richard Z. Cheng, MD, PhD; associate director is Hong Zhang, PhD. Among other team members are Qi Chen, PhD (Associate Professor, Kansas University Medical School); Jeanne Drisko, MD (Professor, University of Kansas Medical School); Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD; and Atsuo Yanagisawa, MD, PhD. (Professor, Kyorin University, Tokyo). To read the treatment protocol information in English: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n07.shtml (Protocol in Chinese at http://www.doctoryourself.com/Coronavirus_Chinese_IV_C_Protocol.pdf
OMNS Chinese edition editor Dr. Richard Cheng is reporting from China about the first approved study of 12,000 to 24,000 mg/day of vitamin C by IV. The doctor also specifically calls for immediate use of vitamin C for prevention of coronavirus (COVID-19). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC0SO9KDG7U
A second clinical trial of intravenous vitamin C was announced in China on Feb. 13th. In this second study, says Dr. Cheng, “They plan to give 6,000 mg/day and 12,000 mg/day per day for moderate and severe cases. We are also communicating with other hospitals about starting more intravenous vitamin C clinical studies. We would like to see oral vitamin C included in these studies, as the oral forms can be applied to more patients and at home.” Additional information at http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n11.shtml
Dr. Cheng, who is a US board-certified specialist in anti-aging medicine, adds: “Vitamin C is very promising for prevention, and especially important to treat dying patients when there is no better treatment. Over 2,000 people have died of the COIV-19 outbreak and yet I have not seen or heard large dose intravenous vitamin C being used in any of the cases. The current sole focus on vaccine and specific antiviral drugs for epidemics is misplaced.”
He adds that: “Early and sufficiently large doses of intravenous vitamin C are critical. Vitamin C is not only a prototypical antioxidant, but also involved in virus killing and prevention of viral replication. The significance of large dose intravenous vitamin C is not just at antiviral level. It is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that kills most people from coronaviral pandemics (SARS, MERS and now NCP). ARDS is a common final pathway leading to death.
“We therefore call for a worldwide discussion and debate on this topic.”
News of vitamin C research for COVID-19 is being actively suppressed
Anyone saying that vitamin therapy can stop coronavirus is already being labeled as “promoting false information” and promulgating “fake news.” Even the sharing of verifiable news, and direct quotes from credentialed medical professionals, is being restricted or blocked on social media. You can see sequential examples of this phenomenon at my Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/themegavitaminman .
Indeed, the World Health Organization (WHO) has, literally, met with Google and Facebook and other media giants to stop the spread of what they declare to be wrong information.
Physician-directed, hospital-based administration of intravenous vitamin C has been marginalized or discredited. Scientific debate over COVID-19 appears to not be allowed.
Ironically, Facebook, blocking any significant users’ sharing of the news of approved vitamin therapy research, is itself blocked in China by the Chinese government. As for the internet, yes, China has it. And yes, it is censored. But, significantly, the Chinese government has not blocked this real news on how intravenous vitamin C will save lives in the COVID-19 epidemic. Here is the protocol as published in Chinese: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n11-chi.shtml
Medical orthodoxy obsessively focuses on searching for a vaccine and/or drug for coronavirus COVID-19). While they are looking for what would be fabulously profitable approaches, we have with vitamin C an existing, plausible, clinically demonstrated method to treat what coronavirus patients die from: severe acute respiratory syndrome, or pneumonia.
And it is available right now.
To read all Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Reports on COVID coronavirus and intravenous vitamin C:
The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource.
Editorial Review Board:
Ilyès Baghli, M.D. (Algeria) Ian Brighthope, M.D. (Australia) Prof. Gilbert Henri Crussol (Spain) Carolyn Dean, M.D., N.D. (USA) Damien Downing, M.D. (United Kingdom) Michael Ellis, M.D. (Australia) Martin P. Gallagher, M.D., D.C. (USA) Michael J. Gonzalez, N.M.D., D.Sc., Ph.D. (Puerto Rico) William B. Grant, Ph.D. (USA) Tonya S. Heyman, M.D. (USA) Suzanne Humphries, M.D. (USA) Ron Hunninghake, M.D. (USA) Michael Janson, M.D. (USA) Robert E. Jenkins, D.C. (USA) Bo H. Jonsson, M.D., Ph.D. (Sweden) Jeffrey J. Kotulski, D.O. (USA) Peter H. Lauda, M.D. (Austria) Thomas Levy, M.D., J.D. (USA) Homer Lim, M.D. (Philippines) Stuart Lindsey, Pharm.D. (USA) Victor A. Marcial-Vega, M.D. (Puerto Rico) Charles C. Mary, Jr., M.D. (USA) Mignonne Mary, M.D. (USA) Jun Matsuyama, M.D., Ph.D. (Japan) Dave McCarthy, M.D. (USA) Joseph Mercola, D.O. (USA) Jorge R. Miranda-Massari, Pharm.D. (Puerto Rico) Karin Munsterhjelm-Ahumada, M.D. (Finland) Tahar Naili, M.D. (Algeria) W. Todd Penberthy, Ph.D. (USA) Dag Viljen Poleszynski, Ph.D. (Norway) Datuk Selvam Rengasamy, MBBS (Malaysia) Jeffrey A. Ruterbusch, D.O. (USA) Gert E. Schuitemaker, Ph.D. (Netherlands) Thomas L. Taxman, M.D. (USA) Jagan Nathan Vamanan, M.D. (India) Garry Vickar, MD (USA) Ken Walker, M.D. (Canada) Anne Zauderer, D.C. (USA)
Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D. (USA), Editor-In-Chief Editor, Japanese Edition: Atsuo Yanagisawa, M.D., Ph.D. (Japan) Editor, Chinese Edition: Richard Cheng, M.D., Ph.D. (USA) Robert G. Smith, Ph.D. (USA), Associate Editor Helen Saul Case, M.S. (USA), Assistant Editor Michael S. Stewart, B.Sc.C.S. (USA), Technology Editor Jason M. Saul, JD (USA), Legal Consultant
Comments and media contact: drsaul@doctoryourself.com OMNS welcomes but is unable to respond to individual reader emails. Reader comments become the property of OMNS and may or may not be used for publication.
PRESS RELEASE: Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, Feb 21, 2020
Nearly every compelling new story has a ‘victim’ and a ‘villain.’ Given the current narrative of the media, individuals who believe in health freedom are more likely to be cast as ‘villain.’ Sadly, mainstream articles insist on emotionally charged language that attempts to persuade their readers to feel victimized by the personal medical choices of those who champion health freedom.
The media narrative attempts to vilify parents who choose not to vaccinate, claiming they take ‘advantage’ of liberty and sacrifice the safety of those around them. Health Freedom Idaho suggests individuals steer clear of traditional media interviews. We have sufficient evidence to believe mainstream media is currently unconcerned about truth. Likewise, we have sufficient evidence to believe that the liability-free pharmaceutical industry sponsors the media narrative.
It’s not news – its an advertorial campaign against those who do not participate in their current mainstream narrative.
A Parroted Message of Non-Vaxxed Villians Nationwide/Worldwide
Recently the media requested an interview with Health Freedom Idaho, who declined. There’s not much of a story in that. The syndicated media kept digging until they found someone they could interview. The interviewee’s noble intention was to dispel the propaganda. Unfortunately, the article left out the crucial science-backed information that the interviewee shared with the reporter. Without this supporting evidence, the interviewee’s assertion was left unfounded.
Sadly, this article was published on the front page locally and republished nationwide, and even published internationally tarnishing the character of the interviewee and feeding propaganda rather than dispelling it.
The article purposely chose emotional phrases such as “lax vaccine laws.” which incite hate and fear rather than an honest discussion. Furthermore, such phrases are loaded with assertions such as, “Exemptions should not exist.” Somehow, the article, rather than focusing on the injustice of the interviewee, inserted California’s Senator Pan as a victim of such Health Freedom advocates.
During this election year, Health Freedom Idaho’s warning to avoid the mainstream media hold further significance. The media uses such poorly written articles to apply pressure on our legislators, republishing them nationwide. Conversely, they censor the truth of vaccine injury and fail to report on pressing issues such as vaccine manufacturers enjoying liability-free products through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Instead of reporting that Congress has placed vaccines in the category of “unavoidably unsafe,” they repeat the sound bite that vaccines are ‘safe and effective.’
It is clear that the mainstream media is no longer striving to “…ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair, and thorough.” Understanding this basic premise, the best thing we can do is avoid mainstream media interviews and not help those who are working diligently to destroy liberty.
When the interview is over, anything can happen.
When you agree to speak with a reporter, editor, or field producer, you may spend hours prepping and answering their questions, but they often only use one or two sentences from the entire interview. Or they may not use any of the information you provided. One doesn’t know until the story runs what will actually be stated. Such is the prerogative of the news media.
This is NOT about Remaining Silent – it’s about Speaking Wisely!
Do you feel you have a civic duty to share the truth, the research, and your story? Please help us! We are currently accepting submissions from freedom lovers. These can be published online and shared across the internet.
We want to provide you a platform to share. At Health Freedom Idaho, we strive to respect your choices, acknowledge your journey, and ensure a free exchange of health freedom information that is accurate, fair, and thorough.
Take 9 minutes to see hear for yourself how the World Health Organization Scientists Question Safety Of Vaccines. This Shocking footage from inside The W.H.O. Global Vaccine Safety Summit on December 2 and 3 2019 lamenting about the LACK OF VACCINE SAFETY STUDIES. It certainly sounds as if these vaccines science leaders of the W.H.O. are using the General population as test samples.
https://youtu.be/s2IujhTdCLE
World Health Organization’s Chief Scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, telling the world in a recorded advertisement sponsored by The World Health Organization that the public can rest assured that vaccines are perfectly safe. (see video) She states that the vaccine program has been “robustly” tested, perfectly monitored by medical authorities and their safety is assured.
5 days later, on December 3rd, 2019, (in the video above) she addresses the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva Switzerland. Here she tells a completely different story- here she tells the truth, not knowing it would go viral.
She states: “we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have very good vaccine safety monitoring systems”.
Oh, what a difference 5 days makes!
At the same Vaccine Summit, it was admitted in-house by WHO doctors that there have been no vaccine safety trials in pregnant women at all, yet they are still strongly encouraging women to have multiple vaccines during pregnancy.
Professor Heidi Larson, Director, Vaccine Confidence Project, stated at the same WHO Summit: ” doctors are lucky if they get a half-day on vaccine education in their entire medical course… we have a very wobbly health professional front-line (doctors), that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem”. Listen carefully here 8:09
And here’s the kicker- Professor Larson then states that much of what is ridiculed as anti-vaccine “misinformation” is not in fact misinformation at all. It is true.
We have been officially told that vaccines are completely safe and effective, that the science is settled, and we, the public, can have absolute faith that the authorities are vigilant in monitoring vaccine safety.
Then we have the Global Vaccine Safety Summit where many of the speakers, representing the very top doctors and scientists around the world, were lamenting the lack of vaccine safety studies.
This should be exposed on every current affairs program, all news and media outlets. But instead, we have silence.
A parent is faced with many choices to make before as well as after the baby is born. Whether it is finding the best daycare or choosing the right equipment for your baby, expenses for new parents tend to add real fast.
In an attempt to save money, new parents could be wondering if buying organic food for their babies is worth it. It is not unusual for parents to go for a lower-cost conventional baby food option to save the few extra pennies they would have to pay for organic food.
The benefits of consuming organic food are widely known and, most notably, for toddlers. Hence, for baby development it is crucial to consider organically grown food. Food that is certified organic in the US is grown without the use of bioengineered genes (GMO), synthetic pesticides, sewage sludge-based fertilizers, and petroleum-based fertilizers.
According to the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), organic animals should also be raised in a way that naturally supports their health and behavior. They must be fed a 100% certified organic diet, they must live on land that has been certified organic, and where they get year-round access to the outdoors, they shouldn’t be treated with hormones, antibiotics, or other prohibited ingredients.
Organic crop growers must also avoid using any genetically modified seeds and instead utilize other methods like crop rotation, to preserve fertility and soil quality. In place of herbicides, pesticides, or fungicides, USDA emphasizes those organic growers strongly rely on the PAMS (Prevention, Avoidance, Monitoring, and Suppression) strategy for safe pest management.
But why is organic food more expensive? Well, because providing safe and better living surroundings for domestic animals, obtaining and maintaining organic certification, and employing other useful organic practices cost more than the methods conventional farmers use.
This is why organic foods are slightly more expensive than non-organic food. The organic price tag is a way that closely reflects the real cost of growing food: the intensive management for chemicals, substituting labor, environmental, and health costs that are borne by society.
So is organic food better for your baby? Is it worth to pay a little more for organic food? We look at the benefits of organic food to your baby:
Limited Chemical Exposure
Organic food is a better choice for your baby because of the lack of chemical exposure. There are toxins in pesticides used on crops that could cause a host of health problems that could affect the baby’s growth rate, brain development, and overall health.
Pesticides may be linked to an increased risk of developmental and behavioral issues, hormonal and neurological issues, cancer, and other health problems.
There is adirect correlation between disease and diet, which means that the risks of ADD, concentration problems and depression can be lowered by feeding your baby organic baby food.
Better Physical Health
Based onthis nutritional study, it was discovered that two-year-olds who were fed exclusively organic dairy products developed fewer incidents of wheezing and eczema. This helps reduce the chances of your baby being diagnosed with asthma.
Conventional foods or non-organic foods are sprayed with chemicals like pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides. These chemicals have been designed to remain on the plant, but when it rains, a portion of them will wash off and be absorbed in the surrounding groundwater and soil, which eventually affects even the wildlife.
Better Taste
Even with all the research surrounding organic foods, there is no denying that organic food tastes better than conventional food. When you start your baby on solids, organic food will allow your baby’s palate to enjoy what is in the mouth.
A good number of parents prefer organic baby food because it simply tastes better with others, prefers it because it is environmentally friendly.
However, what is most important is a balanced diet. Giving your baby homemade organic baby food from the beginning will help set your kids up for a lifetime of healthy eating.
Contributed Author Nancy Baker – a founder of childmode.com
All of us at Health Freedom Idaho want to thank you for your support, loyalty, and the effort this past year in helping us preserve liberty in this great state of Idaho.
We hope you will add some of “our” resolutions to your New Year’s List.
Send a message/ make a phone call for freedom this session.
Thank a Freedom Loving Legislator with a card, letter or phone call
Support Health Freedom Idaho by sharing an action alert with a friend or family member. (Forward and email, tag an individual in a post, send a text message)
Join HFIif I haven’t done so yet. It’s $10 well spent.
