Category: Take Action

  • Fingerprint and biometric scans are on the rise and could cost you your privacy

    What starts as a seemingly harmless and easy way to wake up your cell phone could become a key identification method in the not-too-distant-future.

    Along with the technology improvements, privacy concerns are becoming an increasing concern. 

    Washington state lawmakers just passed legislation that forbids companies from obtaining or selling biometric information without consent of the individual. 

    Adam Levine, author of “Swiped,” and founder of CyberScout, recently wrote at Inc.com about concerns over biometrics and some of its existing applications. 

    Here’s some context about what to expect, going forward, as biometric IDs seeps deeper into our digital lives.

    Traits and characteristics

    It’s now possible for a physical characteristic, or even a behavioral trait, to be parsed into data and stored in a database. That file can then be used to verify your identity, or to check against other entries in the database. Fingerprints, retinal scans, voiceprints, facial recognition, and even the distinctive way a person walks and moves can be converted into data for identification purposes. Heartbeats can even be used to authenticate service users.

    Finding cheats and criminals

    It’s no longer unusual to encounter a biometric scanner at the entryway to a secure area, or even to access and use certain kinds of online services, says Robert Capps, vice president of business development at NuData, a Vancouver, British Columbia, supplier of fraud detection systems.

    “These biometric data points are being used in places like casinos, looking for cheats and criminals walking into those facilities,” Capps says. “Anywhere there’s a place where you want to truly know who that human is, you’re starting to see some biometric verifications.”

    Border crossings

    The Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 actually mandated the use of biometric identifiers in U.S. visas. U.S. embassies and consulates now issue machine-readable visas and travel documents based on biometric technology. And for visa applicants desiring to enter the U.S., the standard for biometric screening is ten fingerprint scans collected at U.S. overseas compounds.

    Theft and fraud potential

    While border security agents view biometrics as a useful tool, state lawmakers are starting to respond to their constituents’ concern about the potential theft and subsequent fraudulent use of biometric data. Given rampant data breaches, who can blame them?

    Washington’s new law imposes strict criteria for the sale, lease or disclosure of biometric identifiers for commercial use. One important benchmark: the bill makes putting biometric identifiers into a database illegal without the person’s consent — meaning such information cannot be collected surreptitiously.

    Regulatory bandwagon

    Other states are jumping on board. Alaska is considering a bill like Washington’s that would prohibit the collection of biometric data without an individual’s consent, among other restrictions. And a proposed bill in Connecticut would make facial recognition illegal for marketing purposes. In Illinois, lawmakers are pushing for changes that would require entities that collect biometric data to destroy the information after a certain period of time.

    “Everybody has got a different approach to it,” Capps says. “Some people are pushing to require biometrics online and other people are saying, ‘Oh, we got to be careful here because physical biometrics can’t be changed, so putting more detailed data out to those databases to be stolen is a really is questionable proposition.’ “

  • Oregon Government Threatens to Spray 2000 acre Organic Farm with ROUNDUP

    UPDATE! Organic Farm WINS! 

    The government received 40,000 emails regarding their threat to spray the organic farm. A closed door meeting brought farmer out smiling as the County is willing to work on a resolution in weed mangement that DOES NOT INCLUDE spray! 

    Oregon a 2000 acre organic farm is UNDER THREAT of being force SPRAYED WITH ROUNDUP! You can help. You must send your email to lhernandez@co.sherman.or.us or call Lauren at 541-565-3416 by May 17. Let your voice be heard. 

    Send an email expressing your concern to the county government: lhernandez@co.sherman.or.us

    Read all the details at Azure’s website: https://hl.azurestandard.com/healthy-living/info/azure-farm-moro/

    PLEASE SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE!!

  • 2017 Legislative Wrap Up

    2017 WINS 
    Health Freedom Idaho Members Impacted the Following Legislation:

    SB 1182 Re-defining child neglect to include parents who don’t follow conventional medical protocols “Faith-Healing Exemption” <FAILED>
    HB 195 returns health care options to allow Chiropractors to adminster IVs. <PASSED>
    HB 91 tracking of vaccine status of ADULTS <FAILED>
    We had some big wins in the 2017 legislative session but we are already prepping for the bigger fight ahead in 2018. Now is time to get involved and take a stand for the wellness of our children and future generations!

    Message from Miste Karlfeldt, Executive Director regarding
     SB1050 Requiring Health Dept to Adhere Current Vaccine Exemption Statutes Requirements (instead of allowing them to create their own) 
    <FAILED TO BE HEARD>

    Idaho’s vaccine exemption form for school attendance. The Idaho Health Department would like parents to believe that Idaho has a no-shots-no-school policy. However, Idaho statues allows vaccine exemptions for daycare and schools. A parent who chooses to avoid some or all of the 68 CDC recommended vaccines for their school aged child, is legally allowed to enroll the child in school (or daycare). Currently, parents are forced to sign IDHW’s mandatory form that demands parents state that their child is more likely to contract a “vaccine preventable disease with specific complication” and that it is negligent for willfully denying your son/daughter the life-saving protection that vaccines offer” in order to enroll their children into school. 

    A parent choosing to take the legal exemption because of religious reasons is required (by the Health Department’s form) to acknowledge ‘card carrying membership’ to a ‘qualified religious organization’ that opposes vaccines and the parent is then required to list their religious objections.

    The Health Department has stepped significantly outside the law that clearly states a parent need only supply a written statement to the schools that they object to vaccines on a religious or philosophical ground without need to clarify or excuse their parental choice.

    Leslie Manookian and Miste Karlfeldt, Executive Director of Health Freedom Idaho spoke with Chairman Lee Heider several times over the summer about this very issue.  He whole-heartedly agreed that The Health Department has severely overstepped it bounds.  He agreed to carry a bill for us to clarify within the statute that a form provided by the Department of Health and Welfare did not need to be filled out in order to enroll our children in school.  

    Health Freedom Idaho went knocking on Legislator’s doors to discuss this situation and we had much support in the Senate Health and Welfare Committee.  Sen. Fred Martin did his homework by calling the schools.  They verified that they were in fact requiring this form and Sen Martin agreed that was outside of the statute.  Our bill, SB 1050, never had a hearing.  

    Dick Armstrong (Director of Health and Welfare) spent much time with the legislators explaining why he requires this form.  He stated that he uses it to educate the public and feels that it is his duty to do so.  Of course, we believe that is up to the parent to educate themselves while using all of the resources available to them.  The shenanigans that took place to keep this bill from being heard were appalling and included Governor Butch Otter telling Sen Lee Heider not to hear the bill.  Sen Heider decided to drawer the bill that he had once promised to carry.  The people were neither heard nor represented on this issue. 

    Parents are faced with another year of trying to enroll their children in school without incriminating themselves on the form mandated by the Dept. of Health and Welfare.  Some have decided to homeschool but not everyone has that option.  Many are having to sign this form under duress just to allow their child access to their promised education.  

    LOOKING AHEAD

    Now that our legislative session has come to a close we look forward to opportunities to educate the public with a desire to build a community of like-minded individuals.  This summer will provide two such opportunities. On June 17, we join more than two dozen other cities with the Children’s March for Humanity.  

    This family friendly summer event will focus on toxins and our children. During the past 50 years, more than 85,000 industrial chemicals have been registered in the United States.  Many of these chemicals have found their way into children’s environments: in the food they eat, the water they drink, the air they breathe and the products to which they are exposed. Some children may even be exposed to them while still in the womb. Recently a study showed nearly 300 chemicals in the cord blood of American newborns. Alarmingly, the majority of these chemicals are largely unstudied and unregulated until proof of harm is already established. 

    Here in Idaho a proven neurotoxin, Fluoride is added to community water. Glyphosate, now labeled a carcinogen, is sprayed in our fields adjacent to schools. Its residue is found on our foods, in our vaccines and even in an infant’s formula and mother’s breast milk. Contamination of the environment by man-made and natural toxins is detrimental to our children’s health.

    Saturday June 17, In Boise, at Julia Davis Park we hope to bring local businesses, community organizations, professionals and families together to share resources, start dialogue and seek ways to support each other in our desire to create a less toxic environment for our children.

    In August, we intend on hosting our second annual Fund-raising Luncheon. This event will allow the Health Freedom community to grow as we are motivated by engaging speakers, encouraged by our growing community and challenged to step out of our comfort zone.

    We are doing all we can to protect you and your family – and we need your help.  We are a volunteer organization and rely on member donations to keep the freedom march alive.

    We had some big wins in the 2017 legislative session but we are already prepping for the bigger fight ahead in 2018. Now is time to get involved and take a stand for the wellness of our children and future generations!

    Please take a minute  become a member today click the JOIN banner above. Or, you can donate once or monthly. It is there you can sign up for our newsletter or even contribute an article to our website.

    We genuinely appreciate your support! Thank you for being a freedom-loving citizen and for supporting the cause!

  • Write Your Legislator

    Write Your Legislator

    During the legislative session, HFI will send out Action Alerts requesting you contact your representative on proposed legislation. This will often involve a quick phone call or simple email. This shouldn’t be the only time you are in contact with your legislator. Taking time to develop a relationship with your elected official off season will allow you the opportunity develop an open line of communication based on mutual respect.

    How to Write Your Legislator

    Elected officials care what their mail says. A logical, courteous letter carries weight; it can change a legislator’s mind, particularly when the legislator is wavering on an issue. It is important that your message be written as effectively as possible.
    Here are a few points:

    • Keep it brief.  Be as brief as possible, but don’t sacrifice clarity and completeness. Two pages is a maximum but one page is best. While form letters tend to be easy to use it better to use your own words. HFI will always present you with key ideas and a sample letter to help you create a personalized letter.
    • Identify yourself.  Let your legislators know that you live and/or work in their district.
    • Keep it focused.  Limit the correspondence to one subject. Otherwise, you decrease the force of your argument and complicate your legislator’s efforts to act.
    • Get to the point.  State your purpose at the outset and use the remainder of the letter to expand your views. Create a simple bullet pointed list within the first paragraph of the reasons you are for/against proposed legislation. Be constructive suggesting alternatives or better solutions, if possible. Use a simple bulleted pointed list to make it easy for the legislator to identify your points. A few strong, well thought out points will be more influential than a long laundry list of reasons.
    • Use facts.  Issues you write about may be emotion-laden, but beware of the nonfactual argument. It will make your legislator less willing to consider your point next time, too.
    • Relate it to home.  Emphasize the effect of the legislation in question on your legislator’s own constituency districts. Give facts and illustrations – use your own knowledge and experience to inform the legislator. Legislators seldom change their decisions because of a philosophical argument but well-reasoned examples carry tremendous weight.
    • Provide background as needed.  Don’t assume that a legislator is as well informed as you about a problem. A legislator can’t keep abreast of everything. Explain the situation, what you think and why.
    • Make specific recommendations. 
    • Keep it positive.  Your attitude is important. A polite, positive-sounding letter is more likely to impress than one that is negative, rude, or threatening. Avoid being antagonistic. Point out the benefits of your position.
    • Close with a friendly appeal, regardless of the action you urge. Thank them for their help and consideration. “Sincerely,” is an appropriate closing.
    • Allow for follow-up. Include contact information and offer to act as a resource should the legislator (or staff) have questions or need additional information. Include your full name, address, your district (find your district here – https://legislature.idaho.gov/who’smylegislator.htm), Where appropriate, indicate in the letter that you will follow up with a phone call

     

  • NVIC Now Monitoring 134 Vaccine Bills in 35 States

    NVIC Now Monitoring 134 Vaccine Bills in 35 States

    HFI: Vaccine bills in Idaho included now voted down HB 91 (vaccine tracking for adults) and SB 1050 clarification of vaccine exemption form.  (This HFI sponsered bill was heard by the Health Committee who agreed it was a valid concern and needed to be heard. Then it drawered by Senate Health Committee after pressured by the Health Department.)

    31 More Vaccine Bills Introduced in Past Two Weeks
    by NVIC Advocacy Team

    We are not even a full two months into the 2017 legislative sessions, and our NVIC Advocacy Team is tracking 134 vaccine related bills across 35 states on the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

    We have added 31 new bills since our last update 2 weeks ago and 8 of these new bills are in 5 states appearing for the first time: MD, NV, UT, VT, and WV.

    If you live in one of the following states, there are bills filed that can affect your rights: AR, AZ, CT, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MN, MO, MS, MT, NE, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, and WV.

    Bills to Restrict, Eliminate or Expand Vaccine Exemptions

    The following states are priority opposition alert state as they now have bills to restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions: AR(withdrawn), CT, IA, MN, NY, OK, PA, TX and UT.

    The following states are priority support alert states as they now have bills to add or expand vaccine exemptions: HI, IA, ID, MS (died), NJ, NY, OK, RI, TN, TX, WA, and WV. If you are in WV, a bill was just filed last week to expand vaccine exemptions and your calls are needed on Monday to get the bill set for a hearing.

    If you are in any of the following states, beware that there are bills filed to expand vaccine tracking or eliminate OPT-IN Consent for vaccine tracking and that these need to be opposed: CT, ID, KS, MA, MT, NY, TX and UT.

    Bills to Shame Schoolchildren with Vaccine Exemptions

    There are school shaming bills filed to require and normalize the public disclosure of vaccination and exemption rates in the following states: AZ, CT, NV, NY, OK, TX, UT, and VA (withdrawn). These bills need to be opposed as states that already do this have experienced increased media hostility towards schools or districts with lower vaccination or higher exemption rates. This instigates community driven discrimination and bullying of vaccine selective families.

    If you are in CT, TX, or UT, there are discriminatory and presumptuous bills that need to be opposed that mandate families utilizing vaccine exemptions participate in state required vaccine education. Just because a family takes an exemption, doesn’t mean they are lacking vaccine education. Conversely, just because a family vaccinates with everything, doesn’t mean they are educated yet no vaccine education is required of those blindly following recommendations.

    time for action

    Use NVIC Advocacy Portal To Take Action If You Live in One of These 35 States Where Vaccine Bills Are Moving

    There are 134 bills filed that need your support or opposition! PLEASE LOG IN TO NVICAdvocacy.org for more detailed information including links to the bills themselves. Please understand that we are analyzing bills and updating the NVIC Advocacy Portal multiple times a day and this information changes daily so log in often. Use this resource to find out what is going on in your state and what you can do to help.

    Here is a breakdown of the types of bills filed that we are tracking as of 2/24/17. Please note NVIC is opposed to the types of bills in bold and we support the types of bills not bold.

    Exemptions and Informed Consent

    • Restricting Vaccine Exemptions: CT, IA, MN, NY, OK, TX, UT
    • Eliminating Vaccine Exemptions: AR, NY, OK, PA
    • School Shaming and Exemption Disclosure: AZ, CT, NV, NY, OK, TX, UT, VA
    • Expand Vaccine Exemptions: HI, IA, ID, MS, NJ, NY, OK, RI, TN, TX, WA, WV
    • Protecting Vaccine Delay and Refusal from Child Abuse Claims: OR
    • Add to Who Can Sign Medical Exemptions: TX
    • Prohibit Docs from Throwing Exempting Patients out: TX
    • Forced Detention and Treatment on Suspicion of Vaccine Preventable Disease: NY
    • Expand Vaccine Informed Consent: OR, TX, WA
    • Granting Minor Children Consent Authority for Certain Vaccines Without Parents: MN, NY, TX
    • Granting School Nurses Vaccine Consent Authority for Homeless Children: WA

    Mandates

    • Adds New Vaccine Mandates: CT, IL, IN, KS, KY, ME, MO, MT, NJ, NY, OR, VA
    • Restricting Vaccine Mandates: MS, NH, NJ, OR
    • Prevents Vaccine Mandates for Adults: MS
    • Requires Children of Foster Parents to be Vaccinated with no exemptions: AZ

    Vaccine Tracking and Reporting

    • Eliminates OPT-IN Consent for Vaccine Tracking: MT, TX
    • Expands Vaccine Tracking: CT, ID, KS, MA, MT, NY, TX, UT
    • Requires Tracking of Parental Refusal of Vaccines: MD
    • Requires Reports of Vaccine Reactions to Leg: VT
    • Adds OPT-OUT on Forced Inclusion Vaccine Tracking System: MA
    • Alters Vaccine Board Positions: ME
    • Requires Public Schools to Conduct Health Visits to Private School Students: IA

    Vaccines

    • Prohibits Certain Ingredients in Vaccines: MO
    • Requires Vaccine Promotion/Marketing: GA, IL, MD, NE, OR, TN, TX
    • Permits Pharmacists Administer More Vaccines: HI, IN, KS, KY, MD, MT, NY, SD
    • Expands Vaccine/Public Health Programs: WA

    Individual Bills NVIC Is Tracking As of Feb. 24, 2017: You need to register and log into the NVIC Advocacy Portal, which provides free access, to view the specific information about the bills in your state.

    Sincerely,

    NVIC Advocacy Team

    Click here to view and share this article on Facebook

    Please Remember:

    The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials. We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register at www.NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC.

  • HFI Supports HB 195

    HFI Supports HB 195

    HFI Supports HB 195

    In an effort to support health choices in Idaho. Health Freedom Idaho supports with House Bill 195. This bill will allow Chiropractic physician certified in clinical nutrition to independently administer prescription drug products as provided in section 54-716, Idaho21 Code.

    HB 195 returns health care options BACK TO THE PEOPLE. The right to choose safe, non-addictive, conservative approaches to care, is the cornerstone to health freedom.

    PASSED THE HOUSE : 

    THANK THE LEGISLATORS THAT VOTED IN FAVOR HEALTH CARE CHOICE

    AYES – Amador, Anderson, Anderst, Armstrong, Barbieri, Bell, Blanksma, Boyle, Burtenshaw, Chaney, Cheatham, Chew, Clow, Collins, Crane, Dayley, DeMordaunt, Dixon, Gannon, Gestrin, Gibbs, Giddings, Hanks, Harris, Hartgen, Hixon, Holtzclaw, Horman, Jordan, Kauffman, Kerby, King, Kingsley(Lohman), Loertscher, Luker, Manwaring, McCrostie, McDonald, Mendive, Miller, Monks, Moon, Moyle, Nate, Packer, Palmer, Perry, Raybould, Redman, Rubel, Scott, Shepherd, Smith, Stevenson, Thompson, Troy, Trujillo, VanOrden, Vander Woude, Wood, Youngblood, Zito, Zollinger, Mr. Speaker
    NAYS – Erpelding, Kloc, Syme, Toone, Wintrow

    Absent – Malek
    Floor Sponsor – Redman
    Title apvd – to Senate

    Background of (HB-195) 

    Chiropractic physicians have over 4500 hours of doctoral education, which includes over 250 hours of nutritional education on average.
    HB 195 will build on this nutritional education with an additional 100 hours covering micro-nutrient nutritional therapies. Chiropractic physicians have effectively and safely been providing IV and inject-able to nutrients for the last two decades, but in 2008 and 2012, through federal legislation and rule changes, the FDA established a new definition of an Rx, which defined any substance injected into the body as a prescription drug.

    The Idaho Chiropractic statue currently states that chiropractors cannot use prescriptive or Rx substances. As a result of the FDA changes, chiropractic physicians lost the ability to provide IV and injectable nutrition to their patients. HB 195 has been well crafted with focus on standardization, accredited education, patient safety and renewal of access to patients seeking IV and injectable micro-nutrient therapy from their chiropractic physicians.

    We applaud the legislators who support Idaho constituents by continuing to give them the right to choose their type of healthcare and their healthcare provider by saying yes to (HB195).

    Individual Links:

          Bill Text 
         Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Note

  • Advocates Petition FDA: Remove Neurotoxin from Hairdye

    Advocates Petition FDA: Remove Neurotoxin from Hairdye

    WASHINGTON — A group of public health advocates today announced that the Food and Drug Administration will consider removing its approval of lead acetate in hair dyes such as Grecian Formula. The group filed a joint petition that requires FDA to revisit a 1980 decision allowing the neurotoxin and carcinogen to remain in hair dye. Lead acetate is the active ingredient that slowly darkens grey hair when used every few days.

    “An FDA ban on lead acetate is long overdue,” said Tina Sigurdson, EWG assistant general counsel. “Lead acetate can expose people to lead, which has been linked to serious health problems like developmental, reproductive and organ system toxicity, as well as cancer. It’s unconscionable that this potent neurotoxin is still used in a handful of men’s hair dye formulas. Lead acetate already has been banned in Canada and the European Union. It’s time for the U.S. to take action.”

    “We now know that lead is more dangerous, especially to children, and skin absorption is a more significant route than FDA thought in 1980,” said Tom Neltner, chemicals policy director at Environmental Defense Fund. “We also have evidence that when the dye is applied, lead spreads widely in the immediate environment. This puts more people, including children, at risk of unknowingly ingesting it.”

    “Government agencies at all levels are making great strides in reducing exposures to lead from legacy sources like paint, old water pipes and other uses long-since banned,” said Howard Mielke of Tulane University School of Medicine. “The fact that FDA continues to allow a dangerous toxicant like lead acetate in consumer hair coloring products is shocking. Our petition would force FDA to get the lead out of cosmetics being sold, haphazardly used by consumers, and stored in home medical cabinets. The FDA action will bring its regulation into the 21st Century.”

    “Lead poisoning is not a problem of the past, and we will continue to damage our future and our children’s future if we do not commit to removing all sources of lead from our products, air and water,” said Eve Gartner, litigator in the Healthy Communities Program at Earthjustice, where she heads efforts to protect human health from toxic chemicals. “It is unacceptable that as we struggle to remove lead contamination in our water supplies and old homes, we still allow lead in home-use hair dyes that many people apply by hand on a daily basis. The FDA must take action now to protect people from this continued source of exposure to lead.”

    “Nearly twenty years ago, CEH action created strict rules to protect California consumers from lead acetate in hair dyes. It is long past time for FDA to take action to protect all Americans by banning this unnecessary and toxic ingredient,” said Caroline Cox, research director at Center for Environmental Health.

    In 1980, the FDA approved lead acetate as a repeated use hair dye with minimal restrictions, including a warning label and a restriction that it only be used on the scalp and not facial hair. The levels of lead in the product are allowed to be as high as 6000 ppm. Three years earlier, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned the sale of household paint containing more than 600 ppm of lead.

    The petitioners cited major advances in science since the 1980 FDA decision allowed lead to remain in hair dye. The petition cites a study showing lead contamination from the hair dyes—especially on surfaces touched after using the hair dye like blow-dryers, combs and faucets.

    The study found these surfaces had up to 2,804 micrograms of lead per square foot. In 2001, the Environmental Protection Agency said that more than 40 micrograms of lead per square foot on the floor posed a hazard to children.

    Dr. Maricel Maffini, an expert consultant to EDF, said that “The risk from an innocent mistake is real: one user who didn’t realize it should not be used on the beard lost feeling in his hands and feet after only seven months. He did not return to normal for a year.” 

    While use of lead acetate remains common in the United States, it is prohibited in Canada and in the European Union.

    The petition was filed by Environmental Working Group, Environmental Defense Fund, Earthjustice, Center for Environmental Health, Healthy Homes Collaborative, Health Justice Project of Loyola University Chicago School of Law, Breast Cancer Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, Improving Kids’ Environment, Consumers Union and Howard Mielke.

    Under the law, the agency must make a final decision within 180 days. If the petition is approved, the ban would be effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register.

    ###

     

    Reporters also may contact Keith Gaby at the Environmental Defense Fund: TEL (202) 572-3336

    This article originally appeared at: http://www.ewg.org/release/advocates-petition-fda-bar-toxic-lead-compound-hair-dyes.
  • Modern-day book burning by the Internet Gestapo

    Modern-day book burning by the Internet Gestapo

    HFI:  Be sure to read the steps you can take to make sure that you have access to independent news to form opinions on topics of science and health that concern you and your choices in health freedom. Blatant censorship is taking place on the internet via google. 

    This is a guest piece by Mike Adams from Natural News his entire site was just taken off google. ALL 144,000 pages.
    It does appear that yes, google has removed all matches to the actual Natural News website. You still get results, but none take you to his site!

    (Natural News) Late last week, I, Mike Adams, received a direct threat that warned if I did not take steps to destroy Alex Jones and InfoWars, I would be targeted for destruction in a campaign of smears, censorship and defamation.

    Instead of giving in to the enemy, I refused to take the bait and went public with details of the threat, warning everyone in the new media that sinister forces were now being pursued to undermine and silence every anti-establishment (and pro-Trump) voice on the internet.

    True to form, today the entire Natural News website has been blacklisted by Google, entirely without warning. This is just one of many censorship events that have all taken place over the last few days:

    • Last weekend, damning videos were leaked in a focused effort to take out Milo Yiannopoulos, a former Breitbart News editor and gay conservative who has openly supported President Trump. Milo was hit with an attack wave of “opposition research” and was forced to resign from Breitbart on Monday, citing the “cynical media witch hunt” that brought him down.
    • Yesterday, InfoWars was blackballed by AdRoll.com, an online advertising distribution company. According to Alex Jones, the blacklisting by AdRoll will cost InfoWars $3 million in annual revenues, possibly causing InfoWars to abandon plans of opening a Washington D.C. bureau to cover the Trump administration with real news (instead of the fake news from CNN and elsewhere).
    • The Shopify e-commerce platform was aggressively threatened by organized Leftists to dump the Breitbart online store and thereby deny revenues to Breitbart. Shopify’s CEO refused to kow-tow to the intimidation and censorship and has maintained a “neutral” position on political issues, focusing on running e-commerce platforms for everyone.
    • Today, Natural News has been hit by Google, which has blacklisted the entire Natural News domain and removed over 140,000 pages from its index. The take down of Natural News happened this morning, and it follows a pattern of censorship we’re seeing being leveled against other pro-Trump websites. Google sent no warning whatsoever to our “webmaster tools” email address on file with them. The shut off of Natural News was clearly driven by a human decision, not an algorithm. We’re currently attempting to determine Google’s claimed justification for censoring our entire website, and we hope to have NaturalNews.com restored in Google’s index.

    Some of the news now being censored by Google includes our laboratory testing of the U.S. water supply, where we conducted laboratory testing to discover that 6.7% of municipal water is contaminated with toxic metals. Google has also blacklisted our announcement of free laboratory testing services for Native American water supplies impacted by oil pipeline leaks. Also blacklisted is our exclusive coverage of the GlaxoSmithKline criminal indictment by the U.S. Justice Dept. and our interview with the whistleblower who helped achieved a record $3 billion settlement with the criminal drug company.

    Apparently, Google believes the public should no longer have access to these investigative journalism articles… and 139,997 more articles that cover activism, science frauds, drug industry criminality, political corruption and more. You are witnessing a modern-day book burning by the internet Gestapo that now decides what knowledge you’re never allowed to access… especially because much of that knowledge can help set humanity free.

    I describe it in more detail in this podcast: (article continues below)

    Silencing Natural News is all part of the globalist “script” for the enslavement of a population kept ignorant of reality

    This is, in essence, nothing less than a modern-day book burning by anti-human globalists who are determined to keep humanity ignorant (and diseased).

    The real agenda of the humanity-hating globalist agenda is now on full display: It’s about total domination over all information so that humanity never learns that cancer can be prevented with vitamin D, or that glyphosate herbicide causes cancer, or that statin drugs are a multi-billion-dollar medical scam. The Sheeple are all slated to be sacrificed upon the altar of Big Pharma profits, and anyone who dares stand in their way will be eliminated by any means necessary.

    What you can do to fight this brazen censorship and assault being waged against humanity

    First off, stop using anti-truth internet gatekeepers like Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Twitter. They are quietly controlling your thoughts, ideas and beliefs by limiting your access to valuable resources like Natural News.

    Second, use GoodGopher.com as your search engine, as it provides you with uncensored search results from thousands of independent media websites (many of which are banned or penalized by Google).

    Third, bookmark NaturalNews.com in your browser and check it at least twice daily (we post new content each morning and each evening). Manually type it into your browser if you have to. From now on, never rely on some other gatekeeper to bring you to Natural News, because those gatekeepers are censoring all our content.

    Be sure to also sign up to our email newsletter using the form below. This email newsletter is one of the best ways we can reach you without being filtered out by other sources. As you might expect, Gmail censors our newsletters too, so don’t use a Gmail email address. (Yes, the censorship is an all-out assault.)

    Finally, make Censored.news a primary resource to watch for breaking news on important events that are being censored by the fake news media (CNN, WashPo, NYT, etc.).

  • Support SB 1050

    Support SB 1050


    SB1050 will be heard THURSDAY Feb 23, 2016 
    at the Senate Health Committee.
    JOIN US at 3 p.m. and stand together to protect HEALTH FREEDOM and our right to immunization exemption without intimidation

    IDAHO STATUTES CLEARLY STATE: VACCINES ARE NOT MANDATED FOR DAYCARE or SCHOOLS. LAWS CLEARLY STATE A PARENT’S WRITTEN STATEMENT IS AN ACCEPTABLE FORM OF IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION.

    The Public Health Department refuses to accept a parents’ written affidavit, which leads many to wonder…
    HOW IS THAT LEGAL?

    Idaho’s Health & Welfare Department created a mandatory immunization form that falls FAR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF CURRENT STATUTES and is discriminatory to the minority of parents who legally choose to OPT OUT of the full CDC vaccine schedule.

    Parents are forced to sign IDHW’s mandatory form that demands parents state that they are putting their children at risk. No parent should be forced to sign a form that is self-incriminatory in order to enroll their child into a daycare program or public school. Parents with moral conviction religious objections to injecting their children with abortion tainted vaccines are forced to claim membership to a specific denomination that rejects vaccination. The Health Department also requires lengthy explanation for religious and philosophical objections.

    The Public Health department is getting away with creating their own rules and children are being denied access to daycare and schools. 

    Regardless of your opinion on the efficacy of vaccines, it is unacceptable to allow the Department of Health to mandate a discriminatory form for school enrollment that violates privacy and is potentially self-incriminating. 

     This content originally appeared on [YouTube](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOYg5OP-SD8).

  • THEY ASKED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

    THEY ASKED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

    In true Legislative Fashion, there is a meeting called to hear public opinion however the public wasn’t given much notification.
    TOMORROW, Friday Morning Jan 27, 2017 both Health and Welfare Committees from the House and the Senate will be opening the floor for discussion for 2 hours. You have 3 minutes to present your concerns to the committee about health (and welfare) issues. 
    Can’t make it to BOISE and the State Capitol? DON’T LET THAT STOP YOU! 
    You can send a VIDEO MESSAGE to the legislators telling them your concerns! 

    To download Testifi for your Android device, click this link from your phone or tablet.

    To download Testifi for your Apple device, click this link from your phone or tablet.

    The 3 Topics that will be the focus of Health Freedom Idaho this session are

    NATUROPATHIC LICENSING
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    • Licensing through the state is not necessary, and is not time or cost effective.
    • Licensing restricted to a few accredited schools would stifle and eventually destroy naturopathy in Idaho. This exclusivity would soon drive out competition, new ideas, and new practices that are the lifeblood of our state and country.
    • This would create unemployment for most of the naturopaths in Idaho.
    REPEAL OF “FAITH HEALING” EXEMPTION
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    • Removing this exemption is in violation of the constitution. The first amendment states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
    • Alternative treatment choices by parents for their children should not be criminalized.
    • Parents actively seeking healing and/or treatment for their child in means that differ from the AMA should not be subject to criminal charges of abuse or neglect. A recent Johns Hopkins study shows that medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death in our nation. There are already specific Idaho statutes in place to protect children from intentional physical abuse.
    IDHW IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION FORM
    HEALTH FREEDOM IDAHO POSITION: OPPOSITION
    Idaho Statute permits a parent/guardian:
    1. The right to choose whether to vaccinate their child
    2. The right to choose to participate or decline participation in the state vaccine registry system
    (IRIS).
    • IDHW REFUSES to accept the legally approved signed parental affidavits forcing schools to deny admission to children. Parents enrolling children in schools and daycare are being forced to complete IDHW’s mandatory immunization form. The form is designed to make parents state they are guilty of medical neglect, denies parents’ legally protected medical privacy, and violates their legally protected right to opt out of the State Registry.
    • Idaho Department of Health and Welfare has imposed IDAPA RULE 16.02.15 (110.02), creating the mandatory IDAHO CERTIFICATE OF IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION for school and daycare admission.
    • However, the only requirement of parents under Idaho Code is stated in 39-4802(2): to “submit a signed statement to school officials stating an objection on religious or other grounds.” The state-prescribed form, based on IDAPA 16.02.15, is in violation of Code 39-4802 and 39-4804. The form developed by IDHW falls far outside the scope of Idaho Code 39-1118(2)and 39-4802(2).