Data suggests that 6% of the U.S. population – 20 million Americans are harboring a retrovirus in their bodies that can develop into an acquired immune deficiency- AIDS. This is not the well-known AIDS caused by HIV, but Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) associated with other retroviruses. These non-HIV retroviruses were unintentionally introduced into humans over the past 75 years. It began with trials of polio vaccines and yellow fever vaccines given in the early 1930s. This is when the first recorded cases of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and autism appeared. It involved the use of laboratory mice to prepare vaccines for human use. [1]  

Even though 20 million Americans are likely to be infected, not everyone will develop serious illness. Retroviruses in the human body are like sleeping giants, very clever and very stealthy. They can infect a person and stay with them for their entire lifetime. Sometimes they shorten life substantially. But, they are just as likely to bring a person to total disability and deny people the opportunity for a normal life. They are quiet until they are activated in immune deficient people.

These viruses are associated with many diseases. Once activated, they create diseases such as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, also called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Chronic Lyme disease, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), numerous cancers, and a wide range of other autoimmune, neuroimmune, and central nervous system diseases. Please see reference number 2 at the end of this article for a comprehensive list of diseases. [2]

Dr. Mikovits is one of the leading scientists in the area of retrovirus related illness. Her research showed how retroviruses are linked to the plague of modern illnesses that are bankrupting the U.S. healthcare system. With a well established history of working for the National Cancer Institute as a cancer research, Dr. Mikovits worked with human retroviruses like HIV. Her work focused on immunotherapy research and involved HIV. In 2009, she was working on autism and related neurological diseases. She found that many of the study subjects has cancer, motor-neuron disorders and chronic fatigue Syndrome (CFS). She believed a virus may have been responsible for these symptoms, and through her research, she isolated the viruses that turned out to come from mice.

She soon realized that these protein and viral contaminants were being introduced into the human population via contaminated vaccines.“Twenty-five million Americans are infected with the viruses that came out of the lab… into the humans via contaminated blood and vaccines.” In response to this discovery, she was fired from her job, indicted, prosecuted, jailed and ordered to retract her research and publicly claim she “made it all up.” She refused to cover up the scientific evidence and was targeted and punished by the “vaccine deep state” establishment.

The result of her unwavering determination to stick to the truth of her research and to stand up against those who want to keep the truth hidden, resulted in her being taken to criminal court and civil court. She was gagged for four years by fabricated criminal charges in Nevada, and could not speak openly about retrovirus science or the government cover-up without risking further persecution/prosecution.

Dr Mikovits is silenced no more. 
She will join us as the featured speaker at the 
Natural Health Symposium in Boise July 21.

In one of the most shocking science videos you’ll see this year, reveals the disturbing true story of how she was thrown in prison for blowing the whistle on deadly viral contamination of human vaccines.

Dr. Mikovitz’ book, Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases.

The new cell tower under constructed on the Vallivue Middle School property is cause for serious health concerns for the families in the small community in Caldwell, Idaho. Canyon County approved the construction of 100 foot lattice cell tower on April 2018. This comes was just one month after the release of a long-term scientific study from Ramazzini Institute (RI) in Italy, one of the most acclaimed institutions of its kind in the world. Their published findings indicate strong reasons for health concerns from electromagnetic radiation (also called radiofrequency (RF) radiation) from base stations or cell towers. The results of this long-term scientific research provide clear evidence that radiofrequency (RF) radiation causes acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) and gliomas, and should be classified carcinogenic to humans.

“The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored,” stated University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor Emeritus Anthony B. Miller MD, Member of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Canada and the UK, and Senior Medical Adviser to EHT who is also a long-term adviser to the World Health Organization.

“Children are disproportionately affected by environmental exposures, including cellphone radiation.” THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, 2013

This new cell tower on the middle school property will now expose 841 adolescents and more than 40 staff to constant and increased levels of RF radiation throughout the school year. The increased exposures will increase risk of cancer and other diseases such as electro-hypersensitivity. Research shows that radiofrequency electromagnetic (RF) radiation from WiFi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function. This will make it harder for some children to learn, particularly those who are already having learning or medical problems in the first place. And since half of the children in this country have some kind of chronic illness, this means that a lot of people are more vulnerable than might be expected to these issues.

Powerful industrial entities have a vested interest in leading the public to believe that EMF/RF radiation, which we cannot see, taste or touch, is harmless, but this is not true. The increased exposure to RF radiation in the adolescents and adults could increase their risk of cancer and other diseases such as electro-hypersensitivity. 

These studies confirm the ever growing literature and provide a wake-up call to governments to enact protective policy to limit exposures to the public and to the private sector to make safe radiation-free technology available.

We ask the Canyon County and the City of Caldwell to do the right and precautionary thing for our children, relocate the cell tower currently under construction at Vallivue Middle School to an area that will not expose children and staff to the constant barrage of carcinogenic RF radiation. – Health Freedom Idaho

More About Safety Concerns

Ramazzini Institute investigators have completed nearly 500 cancer bioassays on more than 200 compounds, and their study design is unique in that animals are allowed to live until their natural deaths in order to allow detection of late-developing tumors. Eighty percent of all human cancers are late-developing, occurring in humans after 60 years of age. This longer observation period has allowed the RI to detect such later-occurring tumors for a number of chemicals, and Armed with current scientific knowledge and guided by the precautionary principle, their published research includes studies of benzene, xylenes, mancozeb, formaldehyde and vinyl chloride.

The Ramazzini research results come in the wake of similar findings from the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) large-scale experimental studies on cell phone radiation. Both studies found statistically significant increases in the development of the same type of very rare and highly malignant tumor in the heart of male rats—schwannomas.

“Biological significance and concordance of results between humans and animals clearly reinforces the strength of the evidence of carcinogenicity. The facts that both experimental studies found the same types of rare tumors, which also have pertinence to the human clinical picture, is striking,” stated Annie J. Sasco MD, DrPH, SM, MPH, retired Director of Research at the INSERM (French NIH) and former Unit Chief at the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, France.

Prior to these recent finding a 2011 article in IEEE Spectrum says that for the World Health Organization, a working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries reviewed the latest research and classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields — from any source — as Group 2B, “possibly carcinogenic to humans based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer.” (source) Citing Studies completed from 2011 to 2018, Dr. Lennart Hardell and other members from that committee are calling to change RF Microwave radiation to Group 1 — a definite human carcinogen.

What Should Be Done: 

State and City governments should enact protective policy to limit exposures to the public and to the private sector to make safe radiation-free technology available.Transmitting wireless antennas such as those on cell towers, should not be be near homes, schools, parks or hospitals. The priority should be to restore more wired communications to reduce the need for wireless connections. Wired communication is higher quality, less vulnerable to cyber attacks and safer for human health because wired technology does not have radiofrequency exposure.In parallel with restoring and building out a wired infrastructure, the goal should be to reduce the power density of cell towers and base stations. People should have the opportunity to live and work in healthier environments.Importantly, the exposures used in this study were at levels that are allowable and legal by the Federal Communications Commission. The Ramazzini and National Toxicology Program Studies show that these two decade old FCC limits from 1996 are non- protective. FCC limits must be updated to protect against biological effects such as cancer and other diseases.

FURTHER READING:

What Parents Need To Know About Safe Technology <printable>

Ramazzini Study on Radiofrequency Cell Phone Radiation …. https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/

Link to the Ramazzini Institute Study 

Question and Answer on the Ramazzini Study 

One page Comparison of the Ramazzini Institute Study and the US National Toxicology Program Study 

Biological Effects from Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Cell Tower Base Stations and Other Antenna Arrays, by B. Blake Levitt and Henry Lai

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety – Cell Tower Health Effects This is an informative website offered by Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., a leading activist in this field.

International EMF Scientist Appeal More than 200 scientists from 39 countries are calling on the World Health Organization and the United Nations to adopt more protective exposure guidelines in the face of increasing evidence of risk.

Location of Registered FCC Cell Towers in Idaho

EHTrust.org

Canyon County http://www.canyonco.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/PH2018-16.Vallivue.pdf

In the Treasure Valley contact BeEMFSafe to learn more about your home and ways to reduce exposure.

There were already plenty of reasons to avoid the highly processed high fructose corn syrup like the plague. Now there’s an even better reason. High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) makes up one out of every ten calories Americans eat. It is in nearly every processed food and sweetened beverage. Americans consume about 150 pounds of sugars per person per year, forty one pounds of which is in the form of HFCS, making HFCS one of the principal drivers behind heart attacks, strokes, cancer, dementia, and diabetes. Now we learn that high fructose corn syrup (also called fructose) contains the neurotoxic heavy metal mercury that has been known to cause mood disorders, behavioral disorders, dementias of various kinds, memory loss, or many, many other serious health conditions. 

A 2009 study led by a former FDA employee found that half of tested samples of HFCS contained mercury. Another study found nearly a third of tested commercial products containing HFCS were contaminated with mercury. In a statement released with the study, one of the authors remarked:

Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. Potentially, the largest exposure of Americans to the neurotoxin mercury is through the consumption of products containing High Fructose Corn Syrup. 

The circumstances leading up to the study are even more alarming.

Years before the study, the lead author, Renee Dufault, was an environmental health researcher at the FDA conducting research on chlor-alkali processing plants. These plants use mercury to produce chlorine and caustic soda—sodium hydroxide, a chemical base used in manufacturing paper, textiles, and many other products, including HFCS. In 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported that about seven tons of mercury were missing from the eight chlor-alkali processing plants in the US. Every year, in fact, these plants reported missing mercury to the EPA. Due to the public health nightmare this poses—since exposure to mercury in even small amounts can cause serious health problems—Dufault began investigating where the missing mercury was going.

Dufault learned that mercury residue in chlor-alkali plants could be found in all products made with mercury, and that caustic soda from these plants was used heavily by the HFCS industry.

She conducted tests and found that 45% of HFCS samples tested positive for mercury contamination. In 2005 she presented her findings to the FDA, but was instructed to drop the issue altogether. 

THE FDA (CHARGED WITH REGULATING SAFETY) INSTRUCTED THE RESEARCHER WHO DISCOVERED THE NERUOTOXIC CONTAMINATION TO IGNORE SERIOUS HEALTH SAFETY ISSUE.

Dufault said that the FDA began taking her off field projects and wanted her “to sit in an office.” When Dufault left the FDA in 2008, she decided to go public with her findings.

Following up on Dufault’s report, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy found that nearly one-third of the fifty-five brand-name products they tested were contaminated with mercury. For a list of those products, you can consult the full report here.

The FDA and the HFCS industry say there is nothing to worry about. The agency said the mercury in Dufault’s samples was elemental mercury and thus safer than other forms of mercury—although no scientific evidence was provided to substantiate such a claim. Know this, there is no safe level of mercury exposure!  None! The lab that originally analyzed the samples even said it was likely that the kind found in the HFCS samples was organic mercury—which is the form most dangerous to human health.

The peril mercury poses to human health, especially to young children with developing brains, cannot be understated.

As Dufault and her colleagues point out in the article, mercury in any form is toxic. Organic mercury readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and damages developing nervous tissue. Even if only trace amounts are found in HFCS-containing products, the amount of HFCS that Americans consume every day without even realizing it makes this a huge concern—especially given the propensity of metals like mercury to accumulate over time. Americans consume Over 41 Pounds of Mercury-Laden HFCS each year.

Dr. Harmon of Clear Mind Center Idaho says, “We see signs of heavy metal toxicity on the brain maps we do at the office. These are neurotoxins and affect the brain. Symptoms are commonly fuzzy brain, ADD/ADHD, learning disorders, and many more.”

Renamed HFCS Is Grossly Misleading

In 2010, the Corn Refiners Association tried to improve the image of HFCS by petitioning that it be renamed “corn sugar.” Thankfully, the Food and Drug Administration turned down their request in 2012. Now, manufacturers have changed the name of a form of HFCS called HFCS-90 to fructose. Regular HFCS contains 42 to 55 percent fructose, while HFCS-90 contains 90 percent.

In other words, the food ingredient now called fructose contains even higher concentrations of one of the primary components within HFCS linked to health issues. Rather than being a healthier product, which the name implies, it is more of health risk than regular HFCS. In fact, since it contains more fructose, the FDA declined to recognize HFCS-90 as safe.

Food companies are taking advantage of the name change to hide HFCS in their products. On the front of General Mills’ Vanilla Chex cereal box, it says the product contains “no high fructose corn syrup.” Yet in the ingredients, it lists fructose, the more concentrated form of HFCS. This means manufacturers are successfully concealing the fact that their products contain the ingredient consumers want to avoid.

8 Deceiving Names for High Fructose Corn Syrup

1. Maize syrup
2. Glucose syrup
3. Glucose/fructose syrup
4. Tapioca syrup
5. Fruit fructose
6. Crystalline fructose
7. HFCS
8. Fructose

Are you concerned?
Mercury contamination was discovered in 2009. The FDA ignored it. In 2010, the FDA then granted permission to manufacturers permission to use a new name. Now almost a decade later, have the producers of high fructose corn syrup/fructose changed the way of processing to avoid mercury contamination? An extensive search on FDA website doesn’t indicate any change in processing requirements to eliminate mercury contamination were ever made. 

RESOURCES: 

This article originally appeared at: http://www.anh-usa.org/mercury-found-in-high-fructose-corn-syrup/.

Report: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/BMBR/article-full-text-pdf/41CAC0411547

Effective of Mercury on the human body: http://www.greenfacts.org/en/mercury/l-2/mercury-2.htm

Tiny amounts of chlorpyrifos, lead, chemical flame retardants and organophosphate pesticides such as Round Up, among other toxins, course through the blood of nearly every American. States are beginning to stand up to protect their children our future generation against the multitude of toxins that assault them daily. Hawai’i made history today when Governor David Ige, watched by representatives of the community from across the islands, signed into law Senate Bill 3095, banning all uses of chlorpyrifos, a neurotoxic pesticide that has been shown to harm children and has been found in food, air and drinking water. The high-profile pesticide was slated for a ban, but under Scott Pruitt’s Environmental Protection Agency, the planned ban was reversed. 

For half a century, U.S. staple foods such as corn, wheat, beets have been sprayed with chlorpyrifos, a dangerous pesticide that can damage the developing brains of children, causing reduced IQ, loss of working memory, and attention deficit disorders.

“Environmental law group Earthjustice listed the risks the EPA discovered through its own research into chlorpyrifos:

• All exposure to chlorpyrifos through food exceeds safe levels of the chemical. The most exposed population is children between one and two years of age. On average, this vulnerable group is exposed to 140 times the level of chlorpyrifos the EPA deems safe.
• Chlorpyrifos contaminates drinking water.
• Chlorpyrifos drifts to schools, homes, and fields in toxic amounts at more than 300 feet from the fields.
• Workers face unacceptable risks from exposures when they mix and apply chlorpyrifos and when they enter fields to tend to crops.

  After decades of determining the neurotoxic impact of this chemical on our children, Dow Chemicals complains that there still has yet to be developed a comparable product available to farmers as a substitute for chlorpyrifos.  Dow add that the proposed restrictions could further result in over-reliance on more toxic substances, such as pyrethroids, which may have a greater negative impact on beneficial insects.

There is little doubt about the science. The federal government has taken a back seat in protecting our children. Its time for the States to take stand up and protect our children.

Hawaii’s landmark law also takes steps to protect children that could be exposed to other airborne pesticides; it mandates 100 foot no-spray buffer zones around schools to protect children from spraying of EPA-designated restricted use pesticides (RUPs) during school hours. As a result, chemical companies will have to report regularly on the RUPs they spray, when and where they are sprayed and in what quantities. As a result, impacted communities can access information about what they are being exposed to, and regulators can make informed decisions about protecting public health, the environment and endangered ecosystems.

“‘Without the ban, farmworkers, their children, and others can’t escape exposure because the poison is in [the] air they breathe, in the food they eat, the soil where children play,’ observed Erik Nicholson, national vice president of United Farm Workers. ‘We all have a basic right to a healthy life.’

“This law is our message to the EPA and to the chemical companies that we will no longer tolerate being ground zero for the testing of toxic pesticides that are damaging our children’s health and poisoning our environment,” said Gary Hooser, former Majority Leader of the Hawai’i Senate, and founder of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action.

Hooser, who lives on Kauai, guided the “Protect our Keiki” coalition of diverse residents from across the islands through the complicated political process that resulted in the law.

“Hawaii’s efforts have set a precedent, and we hope this will pave the way for other states that are looking to enact similar legislation,” said Leslee Matthews, a Honolulu-based policy fellow with Pesticide Action Network.

What about Idaho? 

Idaho usage of neurotoxic pesticides:  Agricultural products contribute more than $3.9 billion to Idaho’s annual economy, many of which – although diverse – are nationally significant. Sugar beets, lentils, wheat, sweet cherries, and apples are among the crops for which Idaho is one of the top ten producers in the U.S.  

Does this mean that Idaho is one of the top ten users of chlorpyrifos?
Did you know Idaho leads infant mortality rates in the U.S. due to fetal congenital defects?

Read More:

What you Need to Know About Chlorpyrifos

Use of Chlorpyrifos in Idaho

Let’s take the confusion out of cleansing. Colon Cleanse? Liver Cleanse? Parasite Cleanse? Lymphatic Cleanse? Juice Cleanse? Sauna? EFT?  Water Fast? Where does one begin? We’ll discuss the concept and process of detoxification and make it more approachable, practical and sustainable. 

When your body is clean, it can absorb the essential nutrients it needs to heal and repair. You’ll experience an improvement in literally every aspect of your health. 

 David DeHaas of Living Waters Wellness Center provide clarity to questions about detoxing. 

Join us at the Natural Health Symposium 
Saturday, July 21
10 am- 5 pm
Vineyard Boise