Category: Vaccines

The truth about vaccines risks and failures.

  • Flu Vaccine Fails 99% in New Cochrane Review

    On February 1, 2018, the independent Cochrane group released its latest findings on the flu vaccine showing flu vaccine fails 99% of the time. Cochrane is a global independent network of researchers in more than 130 countries who strive to produce credible, accessible health information that is free from commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of interest. They do not take Big Pharma money. Therefore, their studies deserve attention when they are released.

    (1) The scientists studied randomized, controlled trials comparing the flu vaccine with placebo or no intervention. They included 52 clinical trials of over 80,000 people assessing the safety and effectiveness of flu vaccines in healthy adults. The studies were conducted between 1969 and 2009.

    The authors found that flu vaccines probably reduced influenzas in healthy adults from 2.3% without vaccination to 0.9% with.

    That means that the difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is 1.4% or 0.014. Therefore, 71 people would need to be treated with the flu vaccine to prevent one case (1/1.4%). In other words, the flu vaccine did nothing for 70 out of 71 who received it. That means this study found the flu vaccine failed 99% (71/72).

    There was more bad news for the flu vaccine in this study. The flu vaccine is touted as decreasing the risk of hospitalizations from the flu. I’m not sure how that happens since the vaccine has never been shown to be very effective against preventing the flu. In this study they found the risk of hospitalization in those that received the flu vaccine declined from 14.7% to 14.1%. That is a 0.6% decline. That means the flu vaccine fails over 99% (165/166) in preventing hospitalizations. Furthermore, the independent researchers found the flu vaccine “…may lead to little or no small reduction in days off work.” To make matter worse, the flu vaccine was shown to cause an increase in fever from 1.5% to 2.3%. Oy vey.

    Why would anyone get a flu vaccine when it fails 99% who receive it?

    Why would any physician prescribe a therapy, which is associated with serious adverse effects, that fails 99% who receive it?

    Why are health care workers forced to receive a flu vaccine when it is consistently shown to fail nearly 99% who get them? And, there is not a single well-done study showing that vaccinating health care workers with the flu vaccine protects against the spread of flu.

    Folks, the flu vaccine is a disaster. I can understand why President Trump does not get the flu shot. I cannot understand why anyone would allow themselves to be injected with a failed flu vaccine.

    (1) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. Feb. 1,2:CD001269

    David Brownstein, M.D. Dr B’s Holistic Medicine, Vaccine Issues

    https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/table-of-contents/2018/2

    Cochrane is a global independent network of researchers in more than 130 countries who strive to produce credible, accessible health information that is free from commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of illness. They do not take Big Pharma money. Therefore, their studies deserve attention when they are released.

  • KPVI takes a Deeper Look into Vaccines with Leslie Manookian

    Published on Sep 21, 2018

    Matt Davenport interviews the writer and producer of the documentary “The Greater Good,” Leslie Manookian about the issue of vaccines.
    For more information, you can check out these websites:
    http://www.greatergoodmovie.org
    http://www.cmsri.org
    http://www.nvic.org
    http://www.mercola.com

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNrMZjbFlKU&feature=youtu.be.

  • The Risk.

    Three billion, nine hundred fifty-seven million, nine hundred twenty-two thousand, five hundred seventy-three and fifty-four cents. Do you know what that represents? The payout to a tiny percentage of families who suffered severe vaccine injury. 

    https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/data/monthly-stats-sept-2018.pdf

    Learn More: 

    Who do you trust to speak for vaccine safety?

  • Your Employer CANNOT Force Vaccinations or a Mask

    Attention Healthcare Workers! Your employer is guilty of discrimination when they force you to vaccinate against your religious and/or moral conscience. They are guilty of discrimination when they force you to wear a mask. While the federal government doesn’t have the authority to override the state’s vaccine mandates, it can enforce the right to freedom of religion or moral conscience for those individuals who are against vaccines. There are several opportunities for employees to protect their rights and their employment in the healthcare field.

     Religious conscience is tied to a religious tenet or belief. Moral conscience is similar to a religious exemption but goes further and is more like a personal belief exemption and doesn’t rely on a religious tenet.

    Learn what you can do to protect your rights!as we host attorney Alan Phillips J.D. and attorney D. Colton Boyles of Davillier Law Group, LLC

    • Does the ambiguity of the new HHS Department rules allow for an employee complaint who is facing discrimination due to their religious or consciousness belief against vaccination?
    • What if I file a complaint with HHS and they deny looking at it? Do I lose access to other means of legal action?
    • Are there other opportunities to file complaints of civil rights violations in order to preserve employment without forced vaccination?
    • Can a Hospital or Clinic deny a patient access to care? What is the resource for families if they do so?

    Complaints filed at the HHS Conscience and Religious Freedom Division

    What is this department and how can it help employees?

    This will be investigated by the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division of the Health and Human Services Department established in January 2018 by the Trump Administration. This department provides oversight to all entities that receive HHS funding to ensure they are not violating religious/moral conscience rights. 

    Federal statutes protect health care provider conscience rights and prohibit recipients of certain federal funds from discriminating against health care providers who refuse to participate in these services based on moral objections or religious beliefs.

    What is the consequence to the employer who participates in moral/religious discrimination?

    An entity receiving federal funding through HHS has the potential of losing the federal funding if they violate an individual’s right for religious or moral conscience. It appears that the rules updated November 2018 do NOT exclude vaccinations.

    This could be an opening to ensure that all vaccine coercion at a state level is stopped from a federal level.  

    How can you know if your employer is receiving federal funds? 

    There are very few organizations that do NOT receive federal from under the umbrella of programs from HHS.

    Has Your Conscience or Religious Freedom Been Violated?

    File a Conscience or Religious Freedom Complaint

    Complaints filed earlier this year are currently in review. It is critical that all those who have experienced discrimination file a complaint.

    We want to flood the system – with this legitimate discrimination issue – there are people being discriminated across the US. You have the right and responsibility to file a complaint- THIS is how we are going to ensure a religious exemption/moral conscience exemption are in place for every person. 

    Want some support? Have some questions? Visit our follow up article


    A Mask is a Discrimination. Can You File a Complaint?

    Is a mask a HIPPA Violation? A Civil Rights Violation?

    We will hear from vaccine exemption advocate Alan Phillips JD as he clears up the confusion on forced flu mask policies. 

    Those entities that have an exemption policy and yet force only individuals who are unvaccinated to wear a mask – could this still fall under the HHS discrimination complaint? It is discrimination. In fact, lawsuits have been won on this very point, as it is singling out a specific group of individuals based on their religious or philosophical beliefs.

    Christian Hilderbrand of a Voice for Choice Advocacy helped to clarify this issue as its ‘a fine line’ complaint to HHS.

    “While a complaint can be made that an employee doesn’t have a religious/conscious exemption for vaccination there is a fine line about being forced to wear a mask. With an exemption in place, that could be like saying “my employer is making me wear pink scrubs.”

    HFI suggests that this is a HIPAA violation since the nurses vaccination status is being broadcast by his/her specific uniform differences. We encourage all to file a complaint and help bring awareness to the problem.  

    HFI’s suggestion, file a complaint with HHS and a lawsuit in your local court.
    Here’s some information on a case that has been won:

    https://www.ona.org/news-posts/ona-wins-vaccinate-or-mask-flu-policy/#.W5K_yRa-PYQ.facebook

    The arbitration judgment:

    https://www.ona.org/wp-content/uploads/ona_kaplanarbitrationdecision_vaccinateormask_stmichaelsoha_20180906.pdf  

    Background

    Vaccine requirements are put in place by each state. Most universities, colleges, schools, and hospitals do have vaccine requirements while most provide religious or philosophical exemptions. Those exemptions can be hard to find unless a parent or employee looks hard or asks explicitly, often times the option will not be offered. 

    While the federal government cannot restrict or enforce vaccine mandates they can protect individuals facing discrimination in this area. In January 2018 the current administration established a new federal department under the HHS that was designed “to restore federal enforcement of our nation’s laws that protect the fundamental and unalienable rights of conscience and religious freedom” and specifically provides oversite to those organizations that receive federal funding.  This new department is called the  “The Conscience and Religious Freedom Division”. 

    from the site: https://www.hhs.gov/conscience/conscience-protections/index.html

    “Conscience protections apply to health care providers who refuse to perform, accommodate, or assist with certain health care services on religious or moral grounds.”

    Who should file a complaint?

    You may file a complaint under the Federal Health Care Provider Conscience Protection Statutes if you believe you have experienced discrimination because of you:

    • Objected to, participated in, or refused to participate in specific medical procedures, including abortion and sterilization, and related training and research activities
    • Were coerced into performing procedures that are against your religious or moral beliefs

    Healthcare workers

    denied employment or been discriminated against while employed 

    • in a hospital, 
    • skilled nursing or other residential care facility, 
    • health care provider office inpatient or outpatient health care center, 
    • medical laboratory, 
    • ambulance service, 
    • direct health or medical insurance carrier, 
    • a facility serving elderly or persons with disabilities,
    • health care provider office

    Clients & Consumers Seeking Access to Shelter

    • denied entry into a facility serving persons with disabilities or group home

    Clients & Consumers Access to Programs

    • Headstart program
    • Developmental Disability Programs
    • Foster care Licensing

    Clients & Consumers Denied Care

    • Denied care or discriminated against in a hospital, 
    • Denied care at health care provider office or inpatient or outpatient healthcare facilities

    How to File a Conscience Complaint

    You can file a complaint online or via mail, fax, or e-mail. Learn more about how to file a complaint with OCR. https://www.hhs.gov/conscience/complaints/filing-a-complaint/index.html

    https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/01/18/hhs-ocr-announces-new-conscience-and-religious-freedom-division.html

    Summary:

    • You have the right to file a complaint (ONLINE or BY MAIL) for religious or philosophical discrimination due to vaccine coercion. 
    • Your complaint will be reviewed.
    • This complaint process could STOP THEIR FEDERAL FUNDING ensuring religious/moral exemptions for every person  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymqlzJhbK-E&feature=youtu.be

    Thank you to the Voice for Choice Advocacy Group for researching and providing this information to Health Freedom Idaho.

    UPDATE: Learn additional steps to protecting your civil right to vaccine exemption: healthcare-vaccine-exemption

  • Fetal Bovine Serum: Why Vaccines are Not Vegan

    Are you vegan? Did you even know that many vaccines use animal DNA to grow and culture the bacterium or virus being vaccinated against? Today’s vaccines have been made from a variety of animal cells, including but not limited to DNA from birds (chicken cells are very common), cows, pigs, dogs, monkeys, worms and other insects. This information alone makes many people shudder. The vaccine packaging label often states that these cells are there only in trace amounts, but they are present nonetheless. 

    Newsflash, vaccines are not #vegan or cruelty-free. https://bit.ly/2ieyaRv

    CDC shows that the following vaccines used in the U.S. were grown using/and contain Fetal Bovine Serum: DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hep A (Vaqta), MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (ProQuad)(Frozen), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable), Polio (IPV – Ipol), Rabies (RabAvert), Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Tdap (Boostrix), Varicella (Varivax)Frozen, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax) Frozen, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax)Refrigerator Stable, 

     It has been estimated that around half a million litres of raw FCS is produced each year worldwide which equates to the harvesting of more than one million bovine fetuses annually. (1) Some sources have suggested that the actual figure may be closer to two million fetuses per year. (2)

    After slaughter and bleeding of the cow at an abattoir, the mother’s uterus containing the calf fetus is removed during the evisceration process (removal of the mother’s internal organs) and transferred to the blood collection room. (3). A needle is then inserted between the fetus’s ribs directly into its heart and the blood is vacuumed into a sterile collection bag. This process is aimed at minimizing the risk of contamination of the serum with micro-organisms from the fetus and its environment. Only fetuses over the age of three months are used otherwise the heart is considered too small to puncture. (4)

    Once collected, the blood is allowed to clot at room temperature and the serum separated through a process known as refrigerated centrifugation.

    It remains questionable as to whether or not fetuses have already died from anoxia (deprivation of oxygen) prior to serum collection. Nevertheless, no anesthesia is given, despite their possible ability to experience pain and discomfort.

    Educate before you Vaccinate. Health Freedom Idaho supports Informed Consent. 

    graphic created by Sarah May.

  • MENINGITIS FACTS

    Meningitis is a RARE disease, 3 people statewide a YEAR contract the illness. The vaccine itself does not cover all prevalent meningococcal strains, including those primarily found on college campuses and it is a very costly vaccine. The disease rate has been going down across all ages and the vaccination rates for high school students has voluntarily been increasing. 

    The Senate Health and Welfare Committee will hear about this rule change tomorrow at 3 p.m. 


    E-mail: the Health and Welfare Committee Members / alternative link 

    msouza@senate.idaho.gov
    alee@senate.idaho.gov
    mharris@senate.idaho.gov
    ccrabtree@senate.idaho.gov
    vburtenshaw@senate.idaho.gov

    mjordan@senate.idaho.gov
    dnelson@senate.idaho.gov
    fmartin@senate.idaho.gov
    lheider@senate.idaho.gov


    Subject line: 16.02.15 Immunization Requirement Opposed

    Here’s the key points. 

    • Meningitis is a rare disease, an average 3 in Idaho contract bacterial Meningococcal meningitis each year.  Around 300 people in the US get ill from the bacteria less than 50 die.
    • The rare disease has been on a downward trend with historic lows in 2016.  
    • The meningococcal vaccine is intended to protect against only 4 strains of bacteria are proven ineffective. These vaccines are effective in providing immunity to those strains of meningitis in only 85 percent of people who receive them.
    • This vaccine DOES NOT COVER the B strain most commonly found on college campuses. CDC reports findings that 93% of the college students contracting the disease were vaccinated!  
    • Meningitis vaccine rates are actually INCREASING without the additional mandates.  
    • The CDC has approved three vaccines targeting the A, C, Y and W135 strains of meningitis: Menactra, Menveo  which still contains significant mercury concentrations in multi-dose vials.

    Meningitis. 

    A rare disease that has an annual death rate in the U.S. of approximately 1 in 1,000,000; literally “one in a million.” [1]

    Neisseria meningitidis, the meningococcal bacteria, is passed by coughing or contact with saliva and is normally present in the respiratory tracts of healthy people without causing disease [3, 4, 5]. In fact, probably no one escapes infection. Symptomatic disease is quite rare for N. meningitidis. As such, 100% of the population, vaccinated or not, are asymptomatic carriers at some point in their lives. In fact, at any time, 5-35% of the population is silently carrying the bacteria, though the numbers often rise to nearly 100% in close quarters, such as military barracks and college campuses [4].

    Is meningitis scary? Yes. But, with only 4 strains of bacterial meningitis and 0 strains of viral meningitis in the vaccine, it’s a guessing game, similar to the flu shot, on which strain you’d even be exposed to. The vaccine, in creating an artificial immune response, actually leaves you more vulnerable to the more virulent strains of meningitis, not covered in the vaccine. 

    Idaho infectious disease reports show the following for Neisseria meningitidis, often referred to as meningococcus. Which causes cause meningitis and other forms of meningococcal disease such as meningococcemia, a life-threatening sepsis. 

    2017: 2 cases
    2016: 3 cases
    2015: 0 cases
    2014: 5 cases
    2013: 4 cases

    According to the CDC’s Enhanced Meningococcal Disease Surveillance Report, 2016 the rare disease has been on a downward trend since the late 1990’s.  372 people in 2016 got the disease nationwide. (Incident rate of .12 of 100,000).

    DOCKET NO. 16-0215-1802 (pg 91) The Health Department wants to “require a second dose of meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination before a student enters the 12th grade in Idaho, starting with school year 2020-2021. If a student received their first dose of meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccine at 16 years of age or older, they will not be required to receive the second dose before entry into the 12th grade.”

    How can you, as a parent, best protect your child from meningococcal infection?

    Answer:  Remind your child that this disease is spread by prolonged contact. Sharing toothbrushes, cups and kissing are forms of transmission.
    Improve your child’s immune system by providing a healthy diet of whole foods that are rich in nutrients.  Give supplements that are high in antioxidants, balanced B-vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids.  Give extra vitamin D3 during cold and flu season.  Heal the gut if your child has gastrointestinal problems.   Stress the importance of getting enough sleep and fresh air.   Help your child learn to relax.  And, just say NO to vaccines that damage your child’s innate immune system.

    Read about this shots function, efficacy and reactions here:

    https://schaabling.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/meningococcal-vaccine-meningitis/

    [1]. Meningococcal Disease and Vaccination.  Fear-Mongering?  YES!! (2011 – disease incident rates have DECREASED since)

    [3] https://www.facebook.com/groups/gentleinformants/permalink/1004672592923652/

    [4] http://femsre.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/1/52.long?view=long&pmid=17233635

    [5] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/meningitis5.html

    New Proposed Rule:

    https://adminrules.idaho.gov/bulletin/2018/07.pdf#page=91

    https://www.millioninsights.com/industry-reports/meningococcal-vaccines-market

    Idaho Infectious Disease Reporting:
    http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/Epidemiology/IdahoDiseaseSummary/tabid/202/Default.aspx

    Disease Trends in Idaho:

    http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Portals/0/Health/Epi/Disease%20Summaries/ID%20DZ%20Trends_2016_FINALv2.pdf

  • Vaccine Market Projected to be Worth $60 Billion in 2020

    What if I also told you that the global market for vaccines is expected to be worth $100 billion in 2025, up from $170 million in the early 1980s. Let me say that again. In the 1980s, with no childhood epidemics to speak of, the market for vaccinations was worth $170 million. Fast forward, and the market for vaccines has grown 350-times larger! 

     U.S. vaccine market was valued at USD 12.8 billion in 2013 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.3% from 2014 to 2020, to reach an estimated value of USD 17.3 billion in 2020. In the 1960s, the U.S. vaccine schedule in the United States called for 5 total vaccine doses for childhood, today it’s 72 doses (that’s not a typo)—a fifteen-fold increase in the number of vaccine doses given to children. 

    As the New York Times reported in 2014, 

    “Once a loss leader for manufacturers, because they are often more expensive to produce than conventional drugs, vaccines now can be very profitable… since 1986, they have pushed up the average cost to fully vaccinate a child with private insurance to the age of 18 to $2,192 from $100, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

    Congress gifted Big Pharma and vaccine makers with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) signed into law by then-President Ronald Reagan, November 14, 1986. 

    Vaccine makers, legislatively absolved of any legal and financial liabilities, have gone hog-wild creating various classes of vaccines for both communicable infectious diseases (e.g., MMR, DTaP, etc.) and non-communicable diseases, e.g., HPV (Cervarix, Gardasil, Gardasil 9) and Hepatitis B, plus newly-minted vaccines using high potency aluminum and/or squalene adjuvants; cell-based vaccines; nanoparticles; foreign DNA; including unknown and untested-for mycoplasmas, all of which contaminate an infant’s, in particular, under-developed immune system during a time when baby is most susceptible to being damaged neurologically and physiologically from neurotoxic chemicals crossing the blood brain barrier due to a vaccine chemical ingredient called polysorbate 80, aka Tween 80.

    Moreover, injecting 8 vaccines at one time into an infant—or anyone—never has been tested in controlled studies to prove either safety or adversity. However, the CDC’s VAERS reporting system probably acts as a post-marketing vaccine adverse health effects surveillance system and database. 

    On the other hand, VAERS receives from one to ten percent only of all vaccine adverse events experienced, since VAERS is not a mandatory reporting system physicians must use! Most physicians are not aware of VAERS and they should be using it to report vaccine reactions.

    A child not waking up for two days after receiving a vaccine is not normal and probably is indicative of brain damage, which should be reported to VAERS. Neither is a child screaming for hours on end after a vaccination. One to two percent of children will be diagnosed with epilepsy [8].

    Adjuvants in vaccines, e.g., aborted fetal DNA which has not been tested to see if it cause transgenic issues, retro viral agents, aluminum in several formulae, squalene, MF59, mineral oil, paraffin oil, Freund’s complete adjuvant, Freund’s incomplete adjuvant, and Adjuvant 65 (peanut oil [9]) cause vaccine actives to be reactogenic. Aluminum is associated with triggering immune disorders. The Hepatitis B vaccine given to newborn infants contains 14 times the amount of aluminum-approved-levels by the FDA! Infant combination vaccines can have as high 850 mcg of aluminum injected at one time! < Learn more about Aluminum toxicity>

    Hey Adults! They are looking to expand their market

    Be aware, during the forecast period from 2014 to 2020, the market for adult vaccines is expected to expand at a higher CAGR than the pediatric vaccines market. One of the major reasons for this is the CDC’s recommendations to adults for immunization against several diseases such as flu, pneumococcal, meningococcal, HPV infection, chickenpox and hepatitis. 1

    Immunizations are free. Right?

    Visiting a Health Department Clinic that offers ‘free’ vaccines are paid for by taxes.  Here in Idaho its the Immunization Assessment Board that gathers funds while many other sources for funding additional vaccines for such as the Vaccines for Children (VFC), a federally funded program, already provides vaccines considered essential.

    In 2018 the legislature passed a bill to renew the Immunization Assessment Board despite the fact proven waste in this program with excessive purchases of vaccines that are not used OR worse, forced on families who do not want them. 

    It all started in 2010  – the year before Idahoans health insurance rates went up about 20%.  You’ve probably seen the headlines as to the problem of making too much for Medicaid but not enough to afford health insurance.

    This is because those who can afford health insurance are paying for ALL the additional vaccines that are not covered by the Vaccines for Children program. 

    The Immunization Assessment Board and IDHW are purchasing large lots of non-essential and provably dangerous vaccines — perishable biological products that are dated and need refrigeration so of course they have reason to push their product.  
    Here’s a review of the Excessive funds for excessive purchases and poor accounting practices.

    From the 9/25/17 Minutes

    Total Collections April through August:  $8,260,447
    DHW Cash Balance as of 7/1/2017:  $7,884,391
    SFY 2018  DHW Received Transfers:  $6,348,917
    Orders and Obligations:  $3,166,780
    Cash Expenditures:  $2,398,728 

    Fund Cash Balance:  $11,834,579   **Consider what that could to back in the pockets of tax payers? 

    Concerns about double purchasing vaccines and the financial waste was brought up at 6/26/17 Assessment Board meeting but nothing appeared to resolve the issue. So tax payers dollars will continue to be collected to purchase vaccines that will be unused and wasted. 

    Have we traded acute illness for chronic disease?

    Over the past twenty years, rates of autoimmunity and chronic disease have exploded:

    • Juvenile Diabetes increased by 23%
    • Cancer increased by 29%
    • ADHD increased by 43%
    • Food Allergies increased by 50%
    • Asthma rates rose by almost 50% 
    • Autism increased 150% 

    “Some of the vaccines have helped reduce the incidence of childhood communicable diseases, like meningitis and pneumonia. That is great news. But not at the expense of neurologic diseases like autism and ADHD increasing at alarming rates.”- Dr. Daniel Neides, Medical Director, Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute

    Vaccines do Damage

    You can always choose to vaccinate, but you can never undo once you have vaccinated. 

    In vulnerable children, vaccines cause autism, seizures, mental retardation and so many other health issues. One must also take into account the fact that for every severe reaction, vaccine provoke less acute effects like confusion, language difficulties, memory issues, irritability, mood alterations, combativeness, difficulty concentrating and behavioral problems. (12). This sounds very much like ADD and ADHD, which are sweeping the child population in epidemic proportions.

    The larger issue is that almost no one knows if their child is a member of this vulnerable population.

    Prior to educating myself about vaccines, I proceeded with the full vaccination schedule until my daughter was 18 months old. She was fine until one year of age. After this point, she hardly progressed in her speech. She was finally diagnosed with mild autism at 3 years old. I believe her brain injury to be caused in part by vaccines. I don’t believe vaccines by themselves cause autism – it has multifactorial causes – but in vulnerable children, vaccines can be the straw that broke the camel’s back. They can do damage in vulnerable populations.

    Perhaps they know if their child is very sickly or already has a disease. This I would consider amongst the vulnerable population. Most symptoms of learning delays and other signs do not manifest until a child is around 2-3 years old. By this time a child has typically received a large proportion of vaccines.

    Science is Settled Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism

    Autism is a behavioral diagnosis. In order to receive the diagnosis of “Autism” a child must exhibit a certain number of behaviors over a certain time frame. If he or she does not do so, the diagnosis of “autism” is not warranted. There is no blood test for “autism.” “Autism” can’t be confirmed or “ruled-out” by laboratory analysis. It’s strictly a behavioral diagnosis. Therefore, anything that causes physiological damage cannot directly “cause” autism. Vaccines cause the underlying physical conditions that result in the pain, neurological damage, immune system disorders, gastrointestinal damage, and yeast overgrowth – all of which combine to produce the behavioral symptoms that result in the “autism” diagnosis. -Marcella Piper Terry

    Science has studied the conditions that lead to the autism diagnosis and their link to vaccines. There is a scientific correlation between the conditions that are a direct result of vaccinations that lead to the diagnosis of autism.

    153 Research Papers Supporting the Vaccine/Autism Link * 

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198681
    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180716005598/en/

    Vaccines caused autism here in this federal court case  page 2

    Vaccines caused Death

    Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/

    Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16126512

    1 

    2 https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/us-vaccine-market-research.htm

  • Kids Vaccinated with Flu Mist Are Spreading Disease

    After seeing a 2% drop in vaccine sales for flu, the ACIP panel brought back the ineffective FluMist live virus multi-strand flu vaccines. It was so ineffective last time it was pulled mid season because it hardly worked. This time doctors won’t know for sure if it works better than before — or better than other vaccine options — until it’s widely used again during an actual flu season. They just want your family to participate in their experiment. More astonishing is they are aware that this vaccine has the innate ability to expose EVERYONE around the vaccinated individual with multiple strains of the flu for almost month. Why would the agency designed to ‘control disease’ the CDC and manufacturers, whose products protect us from disease, intentionally putting children at day cares, schools and teams at greatest risk for flu ‘outbreaks’ this year?

    Just like a dog or cat sheds hair, the human body gives off, or “sheds,” flu virus when infected. FluMist contains weakened, but live flu strains that infect the body enough to provoke a response from the immune system, but aren’t meant to make a person sick.The manufacturer argued that more viral shedding suggested that the virus was activating the immune system -WebMD

    What does SHEDDING mean?

    It means capable of spreading the multiple strains of flu to all the other children in daycare, students in the classroom, children on the team, teachers, coaches, grandparents…you get the idea. So according to SCIENTIFIC evaluations of the vaccines performed by the manufacturers the vaccinated children are putting EVERYONE at risk exposing them to multiple strains of the flu after being vaccinated with the multiple strand flu mist vaccine.

    Manufactured Flu Season?

    While you are getting the needle free flu midst for your child to protect them you will instead be exposing those around your child with multiple strains of the flu for up to 69 days according to studies. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission –http://ow.ly/z75m300DfJg

    The most recent research from the National Academy of Sciences proves that people who are vaccinated spread the virus more, are not protected, and prior vaccination is harming people’s immunity!

    Does the flu vaccine protect you or those around you? 

    Well according to the research, the opposite would be true. The findings of the study found that those individuals who had received the flu vaccine were “shedding” 6.3 times more virus than the unvaccinated!
    Straight from the research:

    “Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

    “The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”

    Plain Language.

    Higher viral shedding means that those who were vaccinated were breathing out more influenza virus and would be spreading it more than the unvaccinated. So when doctors, health departments, or health “authorities” like the CDC push the vaccine by saying things like “the vaccine protects you and those around you,” “everyone needs the vaccine because of ‘herd’ immunity,” or “you have to get the vaccine so you protect the very young, the elderly and the very weak/cancer patients etc.,” they would actually be lying.

    6.3 times more aerosol shedding means that those who were vaccinated were spreading more virus into the air around them just by breathing when compared to those who had not received the vaccine that same year and/or the flu vaccine from the previous year. 

    The implications of this finding now show that those who are vaccinated pose a greater risk to the immune compromised, i.e. cancer patients, the elderly and the very young and that the unvaccinated spread the disease less and protect others better! 

    In essence, the vaccine does the exact opposite of what people have been told and explains why we are seeing more and more people get sick earlier each year and more people die from the flu.

    Reduced protection with annual vaccination, means that the flu vaccine weakens a person immunity against infectious illness. This fact has been shown in multiple studies on children and confirmed with animal studies. One such study deserving of “honorable mention” is this study: Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: A case-control study which found that children receiving the annual flu vaccine had a “threefold increased risk of hospitalization.”

    <Read more https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/ >

    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20180222/flumist-may-be-coming-back

  • Explosion of Chronic Disease in Our Children

    Over the past fifty years, rates of autoimmunity and chronic disease in our children have exploded: currently 1 in 2.5 American children has a severe allergy, 1 in 11 has asthma, 1 in 36 has autism and the list goes on. While some attribute this rise to increased awareness and diagnosis, Thomas Cowan, MD, argues for a direct causal relationship to a corresponding increase in the number of vaccines American children typically receive―approximately 72 vaccine doses by age eighteen. The goal of these vaccines is precisely what we’re now seeing in such abundance among our chronically ill children: the provocation of immune response.

    With our 72 doses of toxic injections, have we have traded acute (short-term self-limiting) illness for life-long chronic disease?

    The above graphic is a modified version of a additional rates of chronic disease increased researched and added by HFI 2018.

    Dr. Cowan looks at emerging evidence that certain childhood illnesses are actually protective of disease later in life; examines the role of fever, the gut, and cellular fluid in immune health; argues that vaccination is an ineffective (and harmful) attempt to shortcut a complex immune response; and asserts that the medical establishment has engaged in an authoritarian argument that robs parents of informed consent.  His ultimate question, from the point of view of a doctor who has decades of experience treating countless children is: 
    What are we really doing to children when we vaccinate them?

    Listen to Dr. Cowan M.D., explain to us the exacting way vaccines disrupt the natural way the body deals with all viruses and bacteria

    Proven Cause and Correlation?

    The rate of chronic diseases in our children is astounding and outright terrifying for those paying attention. 

    The past 8 to 10 years:

    • Juvenile Diabetes increased by 23%
    • Cancer increased by 29%
    • ADHD increased by 43%
    • Food Allergies increased by 50%
    • Asthma rates rose by almost 50% 
    • Autism increased 150% 

    Is there a “cause and correlation” effect relative to children’s chronic health issues surrounding the overwhelmingly accelerating negative health demographics seemingly related following the inordinate mandated number of multi-valent vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as administered by pediatricians since the 1990s?

    Dr Cowan brings up very valid points that direct us to a solid conclusion that vaccines, by their very nature, are triggering the chronic illnesses in our children. Epidemiological studies (statistical surveys) show poorer long-term health is more common among the vaccinated who survive without serious injury than children who are not vaccinated. (3, 4, 8, 9) 

    However this is a question apparently no one in federal health agencies, specifically the CDC and FDA, wants neither to investigate nor find statistically valid data and answers either to substantiate or disprove using science-based methods. They are quick to dismiss any suggestion of a link. 

    The science is settled – is the resounding rebuttal. 

    What is informed consent?

    Informed consent would be a parent saying, “Yes I know that giving my child a chickenpox vaccine will shift them more towards allergies, autoimmune disease and even cancer. I know it will create some neurotoxicity, but I’m not willing to live with the chance of them getting chickenpox.” That is a truly informed parents making the choice they believe best for their child.

    The alternative to informed consent is what is heard most often “Do the vaccine, they work great, there’s no downside.”  This is a fairytale.

    It is critical that parents research the information that is readily available to them. Reading vaccine ingredients, the vaccine inserts about the risks, reactions and the lack of studies performed for the vaccines the doctors are recommended they inject their children. 

    Looking for more information on vaccines and their risk? Visit LearntheRisk.org: NVIC.org and Vaccine.guide

    Remember when science is “settled” – it is no longer science…it is simply blind faith.

    And what of the onslaught of toxins that our children are bombarded with daily? 

    • Toxic Consumption 75% of our foods contains residue of carcinogenic, endocrine disputing chemicals

    • Toxic Absorption Personal care products are loaded with untested chemicals and absorbed by the skin.

      OTC drugs and cosmetics: Different formulations are able to improve or reduce permeation, penetration and absorption of each molecule, but every molecule has a specific capacity of skin permeation, penetration and absorption in function of specific chemical-physical factors. It is a nonsense the tentative to demonstrate that if it is a cosmetic , cannot penetrate. There is not a traffic light that allows substances to pass through or not, according to what is written on the product label. -Rodolfo Baraldini

      SOURCES of statistics from FocusforHealth.org with additional links provided by HFI for updated statistics

    1. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/asthma/index.html

    *2001 through 2009 asthma rates rose the most among black children, almost a 50% increase.

    2. http://www.cancer.gov/types/childhood-cancers/child-adolescent-cancers-fact-sheet 

    https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/

    3. http://www.foodallergy.org/facts-and-stats 

    4.https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2016_1056w814h.gif

    https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/heartdefects/data.html

    5. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html 
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151208150630.htm

    6. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1866098 

    7. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/developmentaldisabilities/features/birthdefects-dd-keyfindings.html 

    8. http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/facts.html

    9. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/news/cdc-epilepsy-rates-increasing-among-adults-children 

    Zack MM, Kobau R. National and state estimates of the numbers of adults and children with active epilepsy – United States, 2015. MMWR. 2017. 66(31);821-825. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6631a1.htm?s_cid=mm6631a1_w.

    https://www.cdc.gov/epilepsy/about/fast-facts.htm

    Toxins Statistics:
    Learn more from EWG consumer guides: https://www.ewg.org/consumer-guides

    a. Chemicals in use:
    2013 there were 85,000 chemicals https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/sunday-review/think-those-chemicals-have-been-tested.html

    b. Glyphosate usage: https://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/show_map.php?year=2016&map=GLYPHOSATE&hilo=L&disp=Glyphosate

    c. Fluoride Usage: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5014a1.htm

    d. Personal Care Products: https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/ 

    e. learntherisk.org, nvic.org

  • How to Submit an Immunization Exemption in Idaho

    Idaho Parents have a right to OPT their children out of some (or all) the state-mandated vaccines for daycare and school. There are 3 exemptions for the state medical, religious and ‘other’. Many schools will not disclose this fact, some schools will demand a form signed and completed by parents. This is NOT required by the statute. A signed parental statement of objection is all that is necessary for a parent to provide the school in order to invoke the right of vaccine exemption.

    No shots, no school is simply not true! 

    Parent Signed Statement of Exemption from Vaccine Mandate

    This is an example of text used by a parent submitting an vaccine exemption statement.

    I/We, _________________, pursuant to Idaho Code 39-4802 (2) and IDAPA 16.02.15.110 I/we submit this signed statement to ______________ school officials objecting to immunizations on religious OR other grounds.

    *Keep in mind you don’t have to clarify whether the exemption is for religious or other reasons. Any extra information they ask from you is used for marketing, tracking with the ultimate goal of removing the liability-free vaccine exemptions.

    Vaccine-Exemption-Parent-SubmissionDownload
    PDF-Vaccine-Exemption-Parent-SubmissionDownload

    Idaho statute 39–4802(2) permits a parent/guardian:

    1. The right to choose whether to vaccinate their child.
    2. The right to opt-out without explanation of objection. This form, created by the Health Department is NOT REQUIRED by Idaho statute. Its requirement contradicts the statute which says clearly,

    “Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.” 

    After 3 years of persistence on the part of Health Freedom Idaho the form has been adjusted and Instructions to Parents regarding vaccine exemptions published by the Health and Welfare Department reflect this accurately. < See the new administrative rules for schools and daycares > 

    Health Freedom Idaho is resolved in stopping the deliberate attempt of the schools to violate parental authority to make health care choices and to protect the privacy of the medical information for their children. If you are having problem with schools who are not following law please contact us iamexempt@healthfreedomidaho.com 

    More Resources that Might Interest You: 

    HOTSPOTS! Vaccine exemptions putting the state at risk? Or is it simply propaganda to take away your parental authority?