Into the lions den they went,surrounded by the most powerful special interest group in America. These brave handful of mothers spoke truth at the ACIP meeting June 2018. This appointed 14 member committee is responsible for the recommended schedule of vaccines for children and adults in the USA and now includes 18 different vaccines given in about 62 doses during a child’s first 18 years of life.By 18 months of age this committee recommends a child receive 34 vaccines. < details of the CDC schedule,> They presented the panel with some tough and well thought out questions and shared some heartfelt truths.

LISTEN TO THE PARENTS

They have been there and have now done the research. If you think these decisions for the cdc vaccine schedule are made with all the facts, data, and with proper safety studies by experts who wouldn’t put us at risk, well then, you need to attend these ACIP meetings. Your jaw will drop to the floor. We ARE the experiment, and then the life-long pharma customer. It’s a great business model. – Shannon Lynn

A few of the public comments brought up over the course of the two days:

• The science isn’t settled because every child is a different control. Every child is not going to react the same. The ingredients in your vaccines are not the same ones your children got. The number of vaccines you got is much less than what you agreed to for your child. 
• Vaccines were tested against OTHER vaccines in safety studies, not against a sterile saline placebo.
• Safety studies are limited with no long-term review of outcomes. Lack of long-term safety testing Hep B vaccine

THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

This is absolutely essential information that needs to be delivered to every parent making vaccine decisions. There are complex non-specific effects from vaccines. For the lay person, that means, there are unintended consequences. Yet, the ACIP, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, the HHS, the IOM, the AAP, the AAFP, ACOG, and other esteemed institutions, which claim to promote and protect health, ARE ALL IGNORING powerful evidence of harm. This behavior has been well entrenched. More and more solid research and evidence is being reported and should be raising serious concerns about the combination of vaccines given, the amount of aluminum in the schedule, the role of human fetal cell contamination, and the serious consequences of giving vaccines to premature babies, etc. Yet all these austere bodies continue to support this enormous toxic burden foisted upon the bodies of babies and children.

It truly must stop. It must be re-evaluated. Yet I felt as if the 14 members of ACIP barely listened to my comments. Will they continue to remain wilfully ignorant of the harm being inflicted on far too many children?  Their two day agenda included discussions of many more vaccines they want to introduce, including a 3rd MMR vaccine because they admit that the vaccine is NOT WORKING! Cutting back or analyzing their current recommendations seems far from a priority.

-Becky Hasting <Video Testimony>

As a member of a Vaccine Safety Education Coalition, Becky writes and speaks on the topic of vaccine safety.

The full testimony of public comments can be viewed
https://youtu.be/5_o5nYGHpJE
 https://youtu.be/Ud4fWlPQwjY

How much money is money spent (and earned) on a vaccines to save possibly one life? Japanese encephalitis vaccines

They are proposing a new Version of the Japanese Encephalitis vaccine. Strongly recommended for ALL travelers and expatriates going to Asian countries for one month or more. When there have been 12 cases of JE in 19 years and the risk of death is 33% in that less than one case per year.

The study compared vaccine to vaccine, and it took over 220,000,000 people who are vaccinated to prevent one death.

The cost of this strongly recommended vaccines is around $650 million to (possibly) prevent one death and $569 million to (possibly) prevent one case.

Where do you think the funds to produce these unnecessary vaccines come from??? 

These are the top vaccine scientists and advocates and none of them see an issue with these numbers. Only a new vaccine that can be pushed onto travelers to generate profit. Never mind that the likelihood of contracting this illness is .25 per million!

Talk about waste!

This proves once again that the CDCs, and ACIPs ultimate goal is pushing pharmaceutical product. These are the organizations we are to trust to set our children’s vaccine schedule. If they recommend it, it must be necessary. Think again. – Shalee Brindley

Background information:

This is the public announcement made prior to the meeting:

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
FRDoc#:2018-09097
Doc@83 FR 19065

held on 6/20-21/18
Matters to be Considered:
The agenda will include discussions on Influenza vaccines, anthrax vaccine, Japanese encephalitis vaccines, human papillomavirus vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, zoster vaccines, pertussis vaccines, and mumps.
A recommendation vote is scheduled for Influenza vaccines, anthrax vaccine. A tentative vote is scheduled human papillomavirus vaccines.
Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate

The public is welcome to submit written comments in advance of the meeting. Comments should be submitted in writing by email to the contact person listed below. The deadline for receipt is June 11, 2018. Written comments must include full name, address, organizational affiliation, email address of the speaker, topic being addressed and specific comments. Written comments must not exceed one single-spaced typed page with 1-inch margins containing all items above. Only those written comments received 10 business days in advance of the meeting will be included in the official record of the meeting. Public comments made in attendance must be no longer than 3 minutes and the person giving comments must attend the public comment session at the start time listed on the agenda. Time for public comments may start before the time indicated on the agenda. The meeting will be webcast live via the World Wide Web; for instructions and more information on ACIP please visit the ACIP website: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html.

Dr. Sears is a well-known pediatrician nationally, and he is not anti-vaccine. He administers vaccines in his practice, but allows for a more individualized approach to vaccines, such as staggering them, or when necessary due to the health of his patients, forgoing some vaccines. He is the author of a very popular book, “The Vaccine Book.” Dr. Sears was also an outspoken critic of California’s mandatory vaccination bill SB277 that removed philosophical and religious exemptions to vaccines. Only medical exemptions are now allowed under this new bill. Dr. Sears favors “informed consent” and parental rights. (See: Dr. Sears: Mandatory Vaccines Bad for California, U.S.)

Senator Pan (the doctor turned legislator who sponsored the mandatory vaccination bill) made no qualms about his desire to go after Dr Sears. The mainstream media is widely reporting that California medical doctor Bob Sears is facing discipline by the California state Medical Board after he wrote a medical exemption for vaccines on behalf of a 2-year old patient who experienced adverse reactions from earlier vaccines. Dr Sears felt forced to accept the settlement. The medical board decides the punishment based on how they see the facts. 

“Everyone should understand how corrupt the system is for him to have to accept the probation. Even if he proved himself 100% in the right, they still could have put him on probation and surely would have to use him as a warning to other physicians writing exemptions.”

What even the opposition fails to understand is that when the truth and liberties of anyone are squashed it is a loss for ALL of us, no exclusions. – Caroline Morgan

Below is the response that Dr Bob Sears provides on his facebook page. 

Patients, friends, and colleagues:

I want to update all of you on the status of the California medical board case against me which began in 2015. For those who don’t know, the board has been investigating me for writing a court opinion letter for a child who had an adverse reaction to vaccines. Recently, instead of proceeding to a trial, the board has offered me a settlement of 35 months probation, and I have accepted. I am at peace with this outcome. Probation means that I will choose a pediatric colleague in the area who will periodically review some of my charts to verify I am, as always, practicing within the standard of care. I will also have to take some extra continuing medical education classes and an ethics course.

Why accept a settlement when I’ve done nothing wrong? The challenge with medical board cases is that even if I win on all aspects of a case, the medical board can still exercise its authority and put me on probation anyway. I win, or lose, a trial before a judge, then the medical board decides the punishment based on how they see the facts. Since it was likely that I’d get probation anyway, I accepted the offer.

All this for a court opinion letter?

Medical boards are normally tasked with protecting patients against doctors who do things like sell drugs, see patients while intoxicated, commit insurance fraud, prescribe a wrong drug that ends up hurting a patient. However, this investigation probably came from higher up the chain of command. I picked a fight with a California Legislator, and he has been very vocal about openly working with the medical board to prosecute doctors who excuse patients from their vaccines, regardless of the merits of a case. 

I signed up for this.

So what really happened, and why should the very existence of this case concern every American?

A child and his mother came to me for help. The mom described how her baby had suffered a moderate to severe neurologic reaction to vaccines almost three years prior, and she was afraid a judge in her upcoming hearing was going to force her to resume vaccines now. Medical records of the reaction were not available yet, and I gave the patient a letter of opinion to show the judge that the reaction was severe enough to justify not doing any more vaccines. The board accusation against me states that such a judgement should not be made without medical records. But this patient needed a letter right away. Getting the patient’s medical records ended up taking over a year. Isn’t it my job to listen to my patients and believe what a parent says happened to her baby? Isn’t that what ALL doctors do with their patients? A patient’s word is often the only evidence we have – as doctors we must trust our patients, the same way our patients trust us to look out for their best interest. After all, I don’t want a child to receive a medical treatment that could cause more harm. I am going to first do no harm, every time.

The second detail in this case, and the part which ultimately prompted me to agree to a settlement, is the medical board observed that I did not make complete medical notes of the neurological exam I performed on the child at a second visit. The child came in complaining that he had been hit on the head with a hammer. I checked him out thoroughly, performed a complete neurologic exam, but you know what? I didn’t write down all aspects of the exam. I documented everything else but that one detail.

Is this fight over? No it is not. This was just case number one. 

The medical board is already lining up four more cases, and these will be about vaccine medical exemptions under the new vaccine law. 

It seems there is an attempt to keep me on probation for the rest of my medical career. But the one thing I’m going to do differently this time is that I’m going to be very open with all the proceedings. With case one, I was silent. Upon the recommendation of my lawyers I haven’t said a thing until now. But I’m tired of being quiet.

• Case number two involves siblings who got vaccine medical exemptions from me because one of the children has a severe medical condition that research has shown can get worse with ongoing vaccination. The other child doesn’t have the condition, yet, but dad does. Exemption for reasons in a family’s medical history is an amendment guaranteed under SB277. We’ll see if the medical board agrees – probably about two years from now. These things take a long time.
• Case number three is a child with a family member who had a severe permanent neurological injury after vaccines.
• Case number four is a teen who had a severe reaction to an infant vaccine, her own doctor told her to opt out of that vaccine after that, and I gave her an exemption from the teen booster dose. We’ll see if the board agrees.
• Case number five involves siblings to whom I did not give vaccine exemptions to, but a parent somehow reported me to the medical board anyway. I don’t know why yet. Should be interesting.

It alarms me to see any medical board questioning exemptions that are given to families who have suffered severe vaccine reactions. It should alarm everybody. 

More doctors need to stand up for their patients, especially the ones who are the most vulnerable. I’m going to continue to stand for these children.

Now that case one is settled, I can go back to being loud and proud about my belief that every single patient should receive complete informed consent prior to vaccinations. This two-year period of silence has been tough. I will not rest until every single family has been given access to full, complete, objective, and un-doctored information that makes every parent fully aware of the risks they accept if they don’t vaccinate their child, and all the risks they take if they do vaccinate their child. Period. And I will fight against mandatory vaccination laws until they are no more. When every single person on this planet has access to informed consent, and can make a free choice, I will then be able to say my work is done.

Thank you all for the outpouring of love and support, and your continued prayers.

SOURCE:
https://www.facebook.com/116317855073374/posts/1835023183202824/

What about the NEW Idaho Health Department Immunization Exemption form? Isn’t it better?! NOPE. It is not. WHY? Here’s our very long-winded answer. 

Idaho statute 39–4802(2) permits a parent/guardian:

1. The right to choose whether to vaccinate their child.
2. The right to choose to participate or decline participation in the state registry system (IRIS)
3. The right to opt out without explanation of objection. This form, created by the Health Dept. is NOT REQUIRED by Idaho statute. 
4. Its requirement contradicts the statutes.

1. The “new” form requests information that is not required by statute in order to invoke your vaccine exemption. Section 39-4802 – specifically limits the information required by the State in order to exempt a child from vaccinations. Health Freedom Idaho still stands against the form. The state-prescribed form, based on IDAPA 16.02.15, is in violation of Code 39-4802 and 39-4804. The form developed by IDHW falls far outside the scope of Idaho Code 39-1118(2) and 39-4802(2).

https://hfi2.designbyparrish.com/vaccine-exemptions

A bill clarifying that the schools should accept a single lined statement from a parent was never heard, the committee chairman drawered it keeping it from being heard.

2. The Health Department is using the information gathered on the exemption forms for tracking vaccination status. Your child’s identifying information, as well as their private medical information, is entered by school officials (and doctor’s offices) into the Tri-State government tracking database.

Tri-State Vaccine Tracking Database – IRIS. This is of great concern to many parents who don’t want their child’s vaccination status tracked by government officials and ‘businesses’ that might ‘have interest’ in the information.

When do they need the vaccine status for HEALTH reasons? Well, in the event of outbreak parents will need to provide schools with proof of vaccination or a doctor’s note that the child has already had the disease. Otherwise, your healthy unvaccinated child will be banned from school until officials determine the ‘outbreak’ is over. Until such time your child’s vaccination status can and should remain private medical information.

3. So, why is this form pushed so strongly by the Health Department? MARKETING. Its used to create media campaigns AGAINST vaccine exemptions. These campaigns specifically vilified parents who legally invoke vaccination exemptions for their children. 

Bottom line: Yes the new form is still an issue and will be until the schools and Health Department COMPLY with the statutes in place. 

Many parents have successfully submitted a copy of the statute Section 39-4802 with a single lined signed parental statement invoking vaccine exemption on religious or other grounds providing only the identifying information their child’s birthday and name (as the statute specifies) to school officials and successfully completed enrollment. Should you choose to use the Health Department’s form and you leave sections blank – itis HIGHLY recommended that you CROSS OUT every section you are not completing. During online training videos the school officials were advised by the Health Department to fill out the information should the parents refuse.

HPV is a devastating vaccine. The new reports from the United States VAERS database are in. The same report with active links to the search strings can be accessed via this link http://sanevax.org/vaers-report/  Even more disturbing a brand new paper just published by Gayle DeLong linking HPV vaccine to decreased fertility. 
“If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million.” 

Over the years, a range of adverse reactions have been reported worldwide after the HPV vaccinations. However, the discovery that the HPV vaccine has been found to cause infertility in some women has only been publicized more recently.

In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3 Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which Dr. Little detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper states:

“Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.

Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counselled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.” [2]

As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report states that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

The Weekly Briefing stated:

“In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”

Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”

The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute. [3]

Thousands of Women Are Now Infertile Because of Vaccines

It is extremely unusual for a girl of this age to enter early menopause. So, we must ask ourselves, was it the vaccine that caused her symptoms or was it something else?

I decided to research if there were any other reports or papers on the subject of vaccination and infertility. I was horrified by what I discovered.

I found a total of 56 research papers listed on PubMed relating to contraceptive vaccines, dating as far back as 1977. No doubt a researcher entering a range of different search terms could come up with many more. [4]

This led me to question whether or not vaccines were being manufactured deliberately to cause infertility. One paper in particular, published in 1989, written by G.P. Talwar and R. Raghupathy titled Anti-Fertility Vaccines appears to suggest that they are. The authors stated:

“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.

A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future.” [5]

It is difficult to judge from this abstract whether these vaccines were being developed for use on humans or animals. However, further research has led me to believe that these vaccines were being developed for humans, because not long after this paper was published, vaccines were administered to women and children in a number of countries, including Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, causing many of them to become infertile.

Girls and Women as Fertility Control Guinea Pigs

In 1997, another paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers was published by Immunology and Cell Biology. The author stated in the introduction:

“The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.

Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.” [7]

At first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper.

On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:

“Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”

Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:

“Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumours are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”

The author continued by adding:

“Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”

These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries for tetanus in 1994, just three years earlier, which were also found to contain the hormone hCG.

So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on?

It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before this paper was written. Another point that should be mentioned here is the fact that these trials were unethical, and yet there is no mention of an ethics committee. Were members of an ethics committee ever consulted before any of these vaccines were administered?

Conclusion

What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely horrific. It appears that many of the recommended vaccinations are known by the governments and pharmaceutical industries to cause infertility. Many of these vaccines are mandatory. We need to ask ourselves why our governments are deliberately force-vaccinating us with vaccines known to cause infertility.

Another question we need to ask is why are so many studies being funded to study the subject area surrounding vaccines and infertility.

Many leading professionals believe that these vaccines are being offered as part of a global depopulation plan. We need to ask ourselves whether or not our governments have the right to play God with our lives without our knowledge or consent.

I believe it is high time that we took back the control of our own lives and researched all vaccinations thoroughly before we agree to be vaccinated. Ultimately, it is each person’s decision whether or not they should be vaccinated, and the only way that we can make an informed choice about vaccinations is to be fully informed of the facts before agreeing to be vaccinated.

I have proven, by referencing documents, articles and scientific papers, that a series of vaccines are being developed that are known to cause infertility. These vaccines have been and still are being administered to innocent people without their knowledge or consent. Surely, this practice is not only unethical, it is criminal.

Christina England, BA Hons

1. http://www.naturalnews.com/041099_gardasil_side_effect_japan_infertility.html

2. http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract

3. http://pop.org/content/teenage-girl-becomes-infertile-after-gardasil-vaccination

4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?orig_db=PubMed…

5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2665354

6. http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm

7. http://www.nature.com/icb/journal/v75/n2/abs/icb199726a.html

8. http://www.infowars.com/polysorbate-80-in-swine-flu-vaccines-infertility-in-humans/

9. http://preventdisease.com/news/pdf/FLUARIX_2009LatestPackageInsert_us_fluarix.pdf

10. http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death/#sthash.eg67UXq2.dpuf

11. http://tinyurl.com/HPVdecreasesfertility

12.