Category: Vaccines

The truth about vaccines risks and failures.

  • Police report reveals reasons police took Idaho newborn

    Police report reveals reasons police took Idaho newborn

    We have an incredible piece of information regarding the case of the removal of baby Elijah from the care of his parents in North Idaho. The mother gave birth on November 20, 2017 via c-section in a hospital in Kootenai County (Kootenai Health). The police took the newborn on the 22nd after dad refused vaccinations while mother and child were still in the hospital awaiting release. One of the accusations listed in the police report  is that “the staff feared the parents would not complete follow-up medical care.” The police report states erroneously that Ari, the newborn’s father, is against medical intervention. This is just one of the accusations they used the child from his family claiming the parents as unsafe and unfit.

    “Ari is against medical intervention such as vaccinations. It is feared that Ari would not take Elijah to get medical attention or do any sort of follow-up after his birth.”


    Police Report for the removal of newborn

    If this family was against medical intervention, they  would not have birthed their child in a medical facility. If this family was against medical care, would the mother be receiving ongoing treatment for her cerebral palsy? Clearly, this family does believe in receiving medical care, they are opposed to the hep b vaccination used against an STD for their newborn son.

    And if they WERE against medical intervention…Where in Idaho statute  does it grant the police authority to remove a healthy newborn due to the possibility that family might not participate in ‘wellness visits’ at a local pediatrician?  ***Furthermore, it is a God given right of parents to determine the modality that they use to pursue wellness for their children. This line must never be crossed.***

    Diamond’s disability was clearly another excuse police and CPS used to remove the newborn from his parents. The hospital staff identified some specialized needs of this family, and instead of assisting the young couple, they called the police to take their child. 

    The police report states:
    “There are times when Elijah was being suffocated when being breastfed. There were no actions taken to prevent him from suffocating.”

    The couple wants their infant breastfed and needs support in understanding of proper latching and positioning of the infant, as is the case with many first time parents. Diamond’s physical limitations require Ari to assist with nursing positions. The police report states “No actions were taken to prevent the newborn from suffocating.” If the baby was in fact suffocating and no actions were taken to prevent it, as the officer alleges, then one would have concluded the baby suffocated, however Elijah is, in fact, alive and well. It is commonly understood that to suffocate means to:  die or cause to die from lack of air or inability to breathe.

    The fact that the child wasn’t nursing correctly that doesn’t warrant his removal from his parents. There are many ways to resolve breastfeeding issues, specialized training with clear direction from hospital staff on how to position the child safely on his mother’s breast could have easily corrected the issue.

    In an effort to discredit Ari as a loving and capable father, the police report identifies some outrageous reasons to claim he is unfit to parent his child:

    • (Father) left the infant with mom while they were both in the care of hospital staff.  Are we not to trust hospital staff for the care of our loved ones? Many fathers have been known to leave the hospital trusting in the medical care provided by staff for their families.
    • Father and infant slept together with infant resting safely on his father’s chest. 


    A baby needs to be held for physical, emotional and mental well-being yet authorities are using the father’s moments of restful bonding with his newborn son as an excuse that he is an unfit father?

    • The infant cried and wasn’t attended to immediately. Sleep – deprived parents have been known to not awaken to a cry immediately. The young family, still in the hospital was adjusting to their newborn. Taking advantage of the security of a safety net of nurses scurrying to and fro, this father didn’t awaken instantaneously. Can you imagine if someone was monitoring your sleep patterns to determine how long your baby cried before you were alert enough to meet his needs? If that was a determining factor in your right to parent a child, would CPS be coming to take your child away?

      This family wasn’t even given the opportunity to develop their new family rhythm. They have the support of a close knit church, with experienced parents willing and able to be available to support in any way necessary.

    This mother’s disability and father’s protective action against vaccinations gave the state an excuse to remove the newborn.  Now, the family suffers from the constant threat that CPS will come in, under the guise of ‘safety investigations’ and snatch their precious baby again.

    This family needs our continued support.

    Police Report for the removal of newborn

    UPDATE: CASE DISMISSED. DECEMBER 18, 2017

    The case against baby Elijah’s parents has been dropped. It NEVER should have happened to begin with. Please take the time to read the police report. In addition to lies about the parents, they admit in the report that CPS took the baby because of the parents’ choice to opt their baby out of the Hep B vax. There was no neglect, no drug use, no reason at all to believe the baby was in danger.

    We WILL NOT allow the kidnapping of children in Idaho. It was because of the public pressure and outrage that this baby is safely back home with his loving parents. Thank you to everyone who called and emailed and took the time to stand against this injustice.

    We must be vigilant to hold those in authority accountable for their actions, for the sake of our own liberty and freedom.

  • Offit Campaigning in Idaho concerns Health Freedom Advocates

    Offit Campaigning in Idaho concerns Health Freedom Advocates

    Paul Offit has accepted the invitation of Bruce Wingate of Protect Idaho Kids to manipulate public opinion into believing there is a significant issue of abuse and neglect affecting Idaho’s children. The ultimate goal of the campaign is to change the Idaho statute to force parents into compliance of government mandated treatments using CPS and Health and Welfare. Their campaign’s target is a small group of families, who reside in Idaho, who do not use medical treatments for religious reasons. Throughout the 2017 Legislative session, Health Freedom Idaho shared the concerns that the approach being taken was a direct violation of religious freedom and the erosion of parental rights. Legislators agreed and voted down SB 1182. <See Health Freedom Idaho’s specific concerns about this legislation> Health Freedom Idaho anticipates Offit’s organization will make another attempt. 

    WHY WOULD OFFIT TARGET IDAHO TO UNDERMINE PARENTAL AUTHORITY IN HEALTHCARE CHOICES? 

    Dr. Paul Offit holds a Merck-funded 1.5 million dollar research chair at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, has stated that children can safely receive 10,000 vaccines in one sitting, and is the co-inventor of a massively profitable rotavirus vaccine called RotaTeq1  which has caused serious suffering in the form of hospitalization, surgery,  and death to more than 1,000 U.S. infants2.

    Therefore, it is ironic that he (a non Idaho resident) has joined a Protect Idaho Kids campaign entitled “Let Them Live”3 which targets the current Faith Healing Exemption law in our state. Many citizens fear the removal of this exemption to be a slippery slope to the inevitable and insidiously motivated, the end goal to further the removal of other parental rights concerning the medical treatment of our children.

    Offit stated in his December 15, 2015 video blog, that parents questioning vaccine safety hold “ill-founded beliefs.” Certainly the parents of the children that were dosed with Offit’s vaccine and hospitalized by this “preventive medicine” once held a firm belief in medical science. That is, until it killed or severely injured their previously healthy infants.

    His books, lectures and television commercials assert his belief that any public outcry advocating Informed Consent is “a threat to public safety” and is “undermining modern medicine.” Clearly, he (and his massive financial incentive) is threatened by individuals doing independent research about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of modern, allopathic medicine.

    In this video, he states that parents that choose not vaccinate their children in accordance with the entire CDC recommended vaccine schedule (which includes HIS vaccine among others) should be forced to relinquish their children to the State.  4 

    Dr. Paul Offit has joined a Statewide campaign calling for changes in our state laws force parental compliance with the use of CPS and Health and Welfare. It begs the question from Health Freedom Advocates, “Is Dr. Offit sincerely interested in protecting Idaho’s children or just self-interested?”

    MORE RESEARCH RESOURCES: 

    RotaTeq Virus ADVERSE REACTIONS

    2 Reports on VAERS (June 15, 2016) for the Offit/Merck Rotateq vaccine introduced in 2006 list 1,135 cases of intussusception with 10 accompanying deaths  (1 in 107) while Rotarix (introduced in 2008) has 583 cases of intussusception  and 11 deaths  (a very disturbing rate of 1 in 50).

    RotaTeq Virus CONTAMINATION

    On May 7, 2010, the FDA announced that RotaTeq vaccine was contaminated with DNA from two porcine circoviruses: PCV1 and PCV2.  To date, the vaccine manufacturer, Merck, has not given any information regarding if, or when, PCV1 and PCV2 will be removed from this vaccine.  Although PCV1 has not been associated with clinical disease in pigs, PCV2 is a lethal pig virus that causes immune suppression and a serious wasting disease in baby pigs that damages lungs, kidneys, the reproductive system, brain and ultimately causes death.  The FDA recommended temporary suspension of the use of Rotarix vaccine on March 22nd after DNA from PCV1 was identified in Rotarix, but did not call for suspension of the use of RotaTeq vaccine after PCV2 was found in RotaTeq. On June 1st, NVIC called on Merck to voluntarily withdraw RotaTeq from the market until PCV2, especially, is removed from the vaccine.
    _________________
    Millions of Children Infected with “Vaccine Safety Expert’s” Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit.

    Paul Offit says you can safely administer 10,000 vaccines to infants at once. But he also profits from the patent he holds for the Rotateq vaccine. What’s wrong with this picture?
    A 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar-grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live Simian Retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years causing great harm.  Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they cannot be removed.
  • Vaccinated children suffer severe disease after vaccination. Vaccine program now suspended by government

    Vaccinated children suffer severe disease after vaccination. Vaccine program now suspended by government

    733,000 children were injected with this vaccine before it was suspended from use. Children suffered more cases of ‘severe disease’ following vaccination.

    French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi announced December 2017, that its world-first dengue vaccine could lead to more severe symptoms for people who had not previously been infected.

    The Philippines has vaccinated more than 733,000 children with Dengvaxia since 2016 when it became the first country to start using it on a mass scale. THREE hundred sixty two recipients of the dengue vaccine from the Department of Health (DOH) have experienced Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI). 

    But it said Friday the program had been suspended.

    “In the light of this new analysis, the DOH (Department of Health) will place the dengue vaccination programme on hold while review and consultation is ongoing with experts, key stakeholders, and the WHO (World Health Organization),” Health Secretary Francisco Duque said.

    Sanofi had initially said its Dengvaxia vaccine was “critical” in the fight against dengue, the world’s most common mosquito-borne virus.

    “For those not previously infected by dengue virus, however, the analysis found that in the longer term, more cases of severe disease could occur following vaccination upon a subsequent dengue infection,” Sanofi said.

    This is clinical evidence of extreme adverse reactions to the Dengue fever vaccine. While the vaccine is not used here in Idaho it begs the question, how much pre-licensing safety testing is done our vaccines prior to release and administration of our pediatric vaccines?

    Sources:
    Bill and Melinda Gates fund fast track version of vaccine reported in 2011 http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-030711/en/
    362 Adverse Reactions to fast tracked vaccine:
    http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/local-news/2016/04/25/doh-records-362-adverse-effects-dengue-vaccine-469921

    733,000 children injected with fast tracked vaccine prior to its suspension by government https://www.yahoo.com/news/philippines-suspends-world-first-dengue-vaccine-071338962.html

    More information on this topic:

    Herd Immunity

    Flu vaccines contain spermicide

    Safety and effectiveness of vaccines

    Interview with a toxicologist on vaccines

    Toxic exposure to aluminum via vaccines

    Who is responsible for monitoring vaccine safety?

    Are anti-vaxxers against all modern medicine or just vaccines?

    Pro-vaccine medical doctor speaks out on fraud of the flu vaccine

    Altered hormones and autism: do vaccines, herbicides and other products increase the risk?

  • VACCINE SAFETY Part 2: failure of pre licensing safety testing

    VACCINE SAFETY Part 2: failure of pre licensing safety testing

    HHS, through the FDA, licenses all vaccines used by the American public. All non-vaccine drugs licensed by the FDA undergo long-term multi-year doubleblind safety studies during which the rate of adverse reactions in the group receiving the drug under review is compared to the rate of adverse reactions in a group receiving an inert placebo, such as a sugar pill or saline injection.

    For example:

    • Enbrel’s pre-licensure trials followed subjects up to 80 months and controls received a saline injection.14
    • Lipitor’s pre-licensure trials lasted a median of 4.8 years and controls received a sugar pill.15
    • Botox’s pre-licensure trials lasted a median of 51 weeks and controls received a saline injection.16

    And even with these long-term studies, drugs are still often recalled.

    While most drugs, like the ones above, are given to sick adults, pediatric vaccines are typically given universally to babies and toddlers. And while pharmaceutical companies remain liable for injuries caused by their non-vaccine drugs, as discussed above, they have no liability for injuries caused by their vaccines.

    One would therefore expect that pre-licensure safety testing for vaccines would be more rigorous than that conducted for drugs.

    Unfortunately, unlike all non-vaccine drugs licensed by the FDA, vaccines are not required to undergo long-term double-blind inert-placebo controlled trials to assess safety. In fact, not a single one of the clinical trials for vaccines given to babies and toddlers had a control group receiving an inert placebo.

    Further, most pediatric vaccines currently on the market have been approved based on studies with inadequate follow-up periods of only a few days or weeks.

    For example, there are two Hepatitis B vaccines licensed for one day old babies in the United States – one manufactured by Merck and the other by GlaxoSmithKline. Merck’s Hepatitis B vaccine was licensed by the FDA after trials which solicited adverse reactions for only five days after vaccination.17 

    Similarly, GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B vaccine was licensed by the FDA after trials which solicited adverse reactions for only four days after vaccination.18 

    Follow-up periods of 4 or 5 days are not nearly long enough to detect possible adverse effects such as autoimmune or neurological disorders, seizures, or death. Worse is that since neither of these clinical trials used a control group, it was impossible to scientifically determine if any adverse reaction in the limited four or five day safety review period was even caused by the Hepatitis B vaccine being evaluated.

    Similarly, the HiB vaccines manufactured by Merck and GlaxoSmithKline were licensed by the FDA based on trials in which adverse reactions were monitored for only three days and four days, respectively, after vaccination.19

    The only stand-alone polio vaccine in the United States was licensed after a mere 48-hour follow-up period. 20

    Even more amazing is that unlike every drug licensed by the FDA, the control groups in these vaccine trials did not receive an inert placebo. 21

    Rather, the control group was given one or more previously licensed vaccines as the “placebo.”22

    This means each new vaccine need only be roughly as safe as one (or in some cases numerous) previously licensed vaccines. Such flawed and unscientific study designs cannot establish the actual safety profile of any vaccine. The real adverse event rate for a vaccine can only be determined by comparing subjects receiving the vaccine with those receiving an inert placebo.

    Yet, this study design, required for every drug, is never required before or after licensing a vaccine. It is unacceptable that the FDA licensing process for vaccines fails to assess the safety profile of each vaccine. It is also unacceptable that the FDA does not require the use of inert placebo controls to assure the integrity of even the minimal safety review conducted. As HHS’s own paid experts, the IOM, explains: “Because [vaccine] trials are primarily … for determination of efficacy, conclusions about vaccine safety derived from these trials are limited.”23

    READ MORE ABOUT VACCINE SAFETY IN OUR SERIES  PART 1  | PART 2 | PART 3

    http://icandecide.com/white-papers/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017.pdf

    12 The rapid growth of CDC’s vaccine schedule is expected to accelerate since there were 271 new vaccines under development in 2013 and far more currently under development. http://www.phrma.org/press-release/medicines-in-developme nt-vaccines (listing 2,300 trials in search for “vaccines” between 2013 and 2017)
    13 See Section IV below.
    14 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/103795s5503lbl.pdf
    15 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020702s056lbl.pdf

    16 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/103000s5302lbl.pdf

    17 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM110114.pdf 

    18 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM224503.pdf 

    19 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM253652.pdf

    https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM179530.pdf 

    20 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM133479.pdf

    21 Ibid. (prior two footnotes)
    22 Ibid.

    UPDATE: HHS Never Reviewed A Single Vaccine Study in the 32 Years Charged with Monitoring Vaccine Safety

  • CDC reports 1 in 36 boys are autistic

    CDC reports 1 in 36 boys are autistic

    Nearly 4 years ago, CNN blasted this headline:   “Autism rates now 1 in 68 U.S. children: CDC“.

    At a special panel discussion about GMOs in 2014, MIT Researcher Dr. Stephanie Seneff, PhD predicted 1 in 2 children would be diagnosed with Autism by 2025. Seneff is a respected scientist who has published over 170 peer-reviewed articles. 

    Last week, the National Health Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released its latest incidence for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in American children. Their document, based on information collected in the National Health Information Survey (NHIS), reveals an ASD rate of 2.76%, or 1 in 36 American children for 2016. 

    Source: Zablotsky B, Black LI, Blumberg SJ. Estimated prevalence of children with diagnosed developmental disabilities in the United States, 2014–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 291. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017.)  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db291.pdf

    The breakdown: 

    1 in 35 children (8-12 years of age) have autism. 

    1 in 28 boys (3-17 years of age) have autism. 

    More than 6% of our children have a developmental disability (1 in 16). 

    More than 8% of our boys have a developmental disability (1 in 12). 

    The current projected rate of increase in autism to 1 in 2 by 2025 is clearly unsustainable!

    Why normalizing autism is not the answer

    Conventional recommendations call for “normalizing” autism. Examples of this are provided in this paper published on the NCBI database in the scholarly journal Front Psychology, a Washington Post article centered upon the importance of autism-friendly characters on the PBS children’s show Sesame Street, and an op ed piece featured in the New York Times from an English professor proclaiming how this change in PBS characters will help enable the normalization of autism to benefit her autistic daughter. 

    We highlight this situation not to make light of the condition of ASD nor to imply that autistic individuals aren’t worthy of the same rights, treatment and consideration that others receive. We want to impress that ASD is indeed a condition of which we should all be paying attention; not to merely accept it as “just the way it is”, but to recognize it for what it is: a progressive syndrome that is on the rise, and which there is an identifiable cause and solution. 

    Individuals diagnosed with ASD do not have to be sentenced to a life of disability and handicap. There are verifiable ways to heal from this illness that the conventional health and medical communities continue to ignore and refuse to employ for the betterment of our population.  

    The result of this patent dismissal is a continued increase in the incidence of ASD. Can our society sustain this alteration? As its effects become more acute, we continue to be affected by its impact on our familial and social structures, and economic stability. Marcella Piper-Terry expounds upon this in her paper: Autism and Families: Stress and Divorce, and the Economic Considerations. A Review of the Literature from 2012. Read more in The Financial Impact of an Autism Diagnosis.

    Another result is that anyone opposing this narrative is considered uninformed and discreditable. 

    Credible support for finding the root cause of autism

    There are a growing number of health professionals who acknowledge this fact. Some include Dr. Natasha Campbell McBride, author of Gut and Psychology Syndrome (The GAPS Diet). Others include Dr. Ray Sahelian. M.D., Dr. Suruchi Chandra,M.D., Joette Calabrese, HMC, CCH, RSHom(Na), Dr. Kelly Brogan, M.D., author of A Mind Of Your Own and presenter of Autism Intensive HD video interviews, and Kim Schuette, CN, Certified GAPS Practitioner. These are just a few pioneers in the health communities working to heal the explosion of ASD and related syndromes, caused by unnatural conditions in our food supply, soil, water, air and all environments.

    These professionals contend that autism is NOT normal. And it is an epidemic. It’s time we did something concrete to acknowledge what’s causing it. It’s time we stop saying “we don’t know what causes autism”. It’s time the medical and health communities rallied together, despite their differences, and look for something beyond genetic causes. This is because it has been demonstrated scientifically, beyond reasonable doubt, that genetics CANNOT modify that quickly. 

    This is not new information, it has simply been censored. For example, in 2011, Joachim Hallmayer, MD, leading author of a paper published in the July 4 issue of Archives of General Psychiatry from Stanford University of Medicine. Read more from Stanford University.

    “Our work suggests that the role of environmental factors has been underestimated.” Hallmayer is an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford. The study’s senior author is Neil Risch, PhD, professor of biostatistics at UC-San Francisco and director of the UCSF Institute for Human Genetics.

    Here’s why we need not accept the current trajectory of autism increase: only 4 years ago 1 in 68 children were being diagnosed as autistic. 

    Today it’s 1 in 36. It doesn’t take a large leap to understand that this scenario is not due to “heightened diagnostics”. Clearly, this situation is due to a case of epigenetics. 

    What are epigenetics? It is happening everywhere we look these days. 

    Definition of epigenetics: relating to or arising from nongenetic influences on gene expression. 

    These changes are not genetic in origin. In short, our genes are being altered in every imaginable way possible: our food, soil, water, air, personal care products, beverages, clothing, furniture, and essentially everything we touch. Each of these factors, added in, can cause changes around the genes that are capable of turning those genes off or on, as time passes. As a result, certain diseases including autism, Alzheimer’s, and other auto-immune conditions, various genes will be thrown into the opposite state, away from the normal/healthy state.

    Only something environmental would cause a change like this, so rapidly. 

    We encourage research, cleaning up the diet, removing environmental factors, and seeking out like-minded folks in our communities, both parental, medical, health and scientific. There is a WEALTH of support for those who want to heal themselves and their children of ASD and related issues. 

    Additional reading:

    15 year old autistic teen has 10x amount of aluminum in brain than elderly person

    Why diet, environment, toxin exposure and lifestyle MATTERS

    Scientific study confirms DTP vaccination increases risk of allergies

    Organic baby foods test positive for dangerous contaminants

    The impact of toxic exposure to aluminum

    Glyphosate contaminated “all natural” bread and breakfast cereals

    KBOI 2 interviews with a toxicologist on vaccines

  • Idaho Health Dept recommends untested vaccine for pregnant women claiming its SAFE

    Idaho Health Dept recommends untested vaccine for pregnant women claiming its SAFE

    Are Vaccines SAFE in Pregnancy? Contrary to the Idaho Health and Welfare’s assurance and the CDC ‘recommendation’ vaccines HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED safe in pregnancy. The vaccine inserts, created by the vaccine manufacturers state the fact clearly “there are no adequate well controlled studies in pregnant women.” In fact, vaccine manufacturers request that doctors register pregnant patients in their database so they can track the outcome and chart vaccine reactions. Pregnant moms and their unborn babies are the TEST SUBJECTS. The CDC is well aware vaccines pose a risk, there has been proven as much as 4250% increase in the death of the unborn baby after mother was vaccinated. Why does the CDC continue to push vaccine recommendations claiming safety for mother and child? The vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable for injury or death if the CDC recommends the vaccine. They can continue to push the shots on moms, claiming safety, while actually conducting the experiment with liability free guaranteed payments.

    HOW can the CDC claim that “There is a lot of evidence that flu vaccines can be given safely during pregnancy, though these data are limited to the first trimester..” and yet each and every flu shot and TDaP vaccine insert says specifically there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Some inserts go as far to say, “available data for vaccine administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine associated risks in pregnancy.

    Download the Vaccine Inserts and read for yourself look at sections 8

    TDaP Vaccine. FLU SHOT.
    – Fetal deaths caused by vaccinations – the horrendous reality of vaccine-induced so-called “fetal demise” – by Marcella Piper-Terry

    RELATED: CDC hides fact that 2012 Flu Shot Spikes Fetal Death by 4250%

    Learn More From Marcella Piper Terri posts this VaxxedTruth.org 

    – DTaP Vaccine Pushed on Pregnant Women despite Fetal Risks July 6, 2012

    – Vaccination Madness: Vaccine Pushed On Pregnant Women 5 October 2013

     
    ———-
    Chelsea Nichole Smith I received the TDaP, against my instincts, March 17, 2015. My daughter was stillborn April 11, 2015 at 35 6/7 weeks. It is likely she was dead a few days before I found out on April 10, 2015. There was no known cause of death, and no flags or warning signs. We were a low risk pregnancy, with no abnormal prenatal clinical or lab findings. If you need my information for anything, you let me know.
    ———-
    Lisa Duvendack Not only do I have a vaccine injured child I have also lost a baby girl when I was 7.5 months pregnant after receiving the flu shot. My trust in doctors is GONE!
    ———-

  • Nurses Fired over flu shot shown to be only 10% effective

    Nurses Fired over flu shot shown to be only 10% effective

    This year’s flu vaccine is only 10% effective… Get your shot anyway, they say (got to use up that stockpile they have)… Worse part is that a number of nurses are losing their job for not getting the flu shot, and those that don’t lose their job have to wear a mask for the entire winter… Not to forget all the pregnant women who are being bullied to get the flu shot… This is beyond ridiculous.

    “The flu vaccine used this year in Australia — which has the same composition as the vaccine used in the U.S. — was only 10 percent effective […]”

    “Is anyone paying attention? WHO EXACTLY BENEFITS FROM MANDATORY FLU SHOTS? <Hint: they have no a liability if you have an adverse reaction to the shot. They are anticipated to make $1.6 billion annually  with their less than effective flu shots>”

    Idaho has a medical and religious exemption for flu shots. <See Sample Letter for Religious Exemption>

    SOURCES:
    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/years-flu-season-bad-medical-experts-warn/story?id=51473025

    https://nurse.org/articles/nurses-fired-decline-flu-vaccine/

    https://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/19/the-16-billion-business-of-flu.html

  • What about Herd Immunity?

    What about Herd Immunity?

    Herd
    immunity is a lie used to scare you into taking dangerous vaccines. 3 out of 4 people are unvaccinated and thus herd
    immunity doesn’t exist.
    The sound bites of “herd immunity” are over simplification of a deeply complicated topic. 

    More information from Suzanne on herd immunity. https://youtu.be/8GDQwYFZnCk

    4 Reasons Why Measles & Herd Immunity Isn’t Working https://youtu.be/GBzJHXrrDB8

  • New CDC Guidelines: 5 Year-Old Can Receive up to 19 Vaccinations in One Month

    New CDC Guidelines: 5 Year-Old Can Receive up to 19 Vaccinations in One Month

    CDC has launched a vaccine ‘catch-up schedule’ that has NOT been tested for safety, requiring a five year old to receive 19 vaccines in one month. This includes 6 doses of aluminum-containing injections! Neither manufacturers, nor the CDC has tested for safety to determine the immediate or long-term risk of neurological or immunological damage.  

    On November 2, 2017, Neil Z. Miller made an online announcement that was guaranteed to shock thousands of parents worldwide.

    In a post, written on the popular social media platform Facebook, Miller exposed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had recently hatched a plan to ensure that ALL children were up to date with their scheduled vaccinations, whether they were vaccinated or unvaccinated . He revealed that the CDC had launched a catch-up program which could cause an unvaccinated 5-year-old to receive as many as 19 vaccinations in one month.

    He wrote that:

    “The CDC has just launched a program that will calculate a catch-up schedule for children who were not vaccinated on schedule. A 5-year-old child who was not previously vaccinated would be required to receive 19 vaccines in one month, including 6 doses of aluminum-containing injections! This catch-up schedule was NOT tested for safety to determine the immediate or long-term risk of neurological or immunological damage.” (own emphasis)

    Following the links provided by Miller, it appears that the CDC table of vaccinations required in their catch-up program had been approved by the following organizations:

    Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – ( www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip)

    American Academy of Pediatrics – ( www.aap.org)

     American Academy of Family Physicians – ( www.aafp.org)

     American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – ( www.acog.org)

    See tables here.

    Combining Childhood Vaccinations in One Visit is Potentially Life-Threatening

    In September 2016, Miller and his co-author Goldman published a paper titled Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe.

    Using data taken from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website, Miller was able to prove that the more vaccines a child received at any given time, the more likely an adverse reaction could occur.

    They wrote that:

     “… Of the 38,801 VAERS reports that we analyzed, 969 infants received two vaccine doses prior to the adverse event and 107 of those infants were hospitalized: a hospitalization rate of 11%. Of 1,959 infants who received three vaccine doses prior to the adverse event, 243 of them required hospitalization: 12.4%. For four doses, 561 of 3,909 infants were hospitalized: 14.4%.

    Notice the emerging pattern: Infants who had an adverse event reported to VAERS were more likely to require hospitalization when they received three vaccine doses instead of two, or four vaccine doses instead of three.”

    The researchers continued:

    “… Of 10,114 infants who received five vaccine doses prior to the adverse event, 1,463 of them required hospitalization: 14.5%. For six doses, 1,365 of 8,454 infants were hospitalized: 16.1%. For seven doses, 1,051 of 5,489 infants were hospitalized: 19.1%. And for eight doses, 661 of 2,817 infants were hospitalized: 23.5%. The hospitalization rate increased linearly from 11.0% for two doses to 23.5% for eight doses.”

    In other words, the more vaccines that an infant received, the more likely they were to suffer an adverse reaction.

    Miller and Goldman explained that:

    “Of the 38,801 VAERS reports that we analyzed, 11,927 infants received one, two, three, or four vaccine doses prior to having an adverse event, and 423 of those infants died: a mortality rate of 3.6%. The remaining 26,874 infants received five, six, seven, or eight vaccine doses prior to the adverse event and 1,458 of them died: 5.4%.

    The mortality rate for infants who received five to eight vaccine doses (5.4%) is significantly higher than the mortality rate for infants who received one to four doses (3.6%), with a rate ratio(RR) of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4-1.7).

    Of infants reported to VAERS, those who had received more vaccines had a statistically significant 50% higher mortality rate compared with those who had received fewer.”

    To read more on Miller’s paper, see my article: New Study Warns of the Dangers of Multiple Vaccinations.

    Once again the CDC is recommending vaccines in a schedule for our children without safety testing. Health Freedom Idaho joined 55 organizations respectfully requesting the US Department of Health and Human Services to provide confirmation that certain obligations regarding vaccine safety required under the 1986 Act have been fulfilled or will forthwith be fulfilled. Read the entire notice at HHS Vaccine Safety Responsibilities and Notice Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-31

  • Allergens and Vaccines

    Allergens and Vaccines

    Have an egg allergy? CDC has decided that a flu vaccine contaminated with eggs is ok. CDC, the doctors nor the pharmaceutical company isn’t liable if your child suffers a reaction from the contaminated vaccine. In the vast majority of cases, the flu is not a big deal for healthy children. Whereas anaphylactic food allergies kill thousands of children every year. 

    Philadelphia weatherman Adam Joseph shares that his son, who is allergic to eggs, is having an adverse reaction to the flu shot. 

    Several nurses have posted that, unlike in years past, the CDC now says it’s okay to give the flu vaccine to children with egg allergies, and that “even with the reactions, getting the vaccine is still better than getting the flu.” These nurses are so blinded by dogma that they have forgotten their first responsibility, which is to be an advocate for the patient. Instead, they are now simply salespeople for vaccines, spewing the misinformation from the CDC.

    The CDC owns 57 vaccine patents and buys and sells (at a hefty profit) nearly $5 Billion worth of vaccines every year. Taking advice from The CDC on vaccines safety is like believing everything a used car salesman tells you about that “little beauty grandma only drove to church on Sunday.”
    Adam asked for advice.

    Marcella Piper Terry’s response:
    I did not have an egg allergy until after getting my one and only flu shot – which put me in the hospital for a total of 31 days; five of which were in Neuro-Intensive Care in a medical coma. Injecting food proteins into the blood stream is THE WAY to cause food allergies.
    Many vaccines are cultured on food proteins, including eggs, cow’s milk, and yeast. Food proteins are supposed to go through the gut, where they are broken down by the gastric juices. When they are injected, they quickly make their way into the blood stream, where the body sees them as foreign invaders attacking the system. This is especially true when those food proteins are paired with neuro-immune toxin like mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde (ingredients in vaccines).

    Vaccines are the source of many food allergies. Anaphylactic peanut allergies were basically unheard of until vaccine manufacturers started using peanut oil as an adjuvant in the 1960s-1970s. An adjuvant is something that is added to the vaccine to cause an increased inflammatory response. Unfortunately, that response primes the immune system to recognize that substance as toxic, and the immune system responds violently when re-exposed to that substance later on.

    Look at the ingredients in vaccines, and also research the childhood infections they are designed to protect against.
    Doing a cost-benefit analysis is something we should all be doing, if we are to be informed consumers.

    Here is a list of vaccine ingredients (from the CDC website):
    TinyURL.com/ExcipientList