Category: Vaccines

The truth about vaccines risks and failures.

  • Sweet Mason. Three weeks before he died.

    Sweet Mason. Three weeks before he died.

    A heartbreaking letter posted on Vaxxed.com from a mom experiencing a truly tragic loss. 
    Dear Moms,
    Six years ago I was taking this picture of my sweet Mason.
    This was three weeks before he died.
    Look at his chubby red cheeks. Look at the light in his eyes. Look at the smile on his face. He was healthy. He was normal.
    Healthy, normal babies do not randomly die in their sleep for no reason. “SIDS” is not a diagnosis. It’s what medical examiners and coroners say when the autopsy comes back normal and there are no signs of suffocation, asphyxiation or any other cause of death.
    “SIDS” is the term used by medical professionals to cover up VIDS OR Vaccine Induced Death Syndrome.
    PLEASE – Educate before you vaccinate. Here’s a great place to start you research: 
    I miss this little guy so much 
    Kari Bundy
  • Vaccine Education Facts & Resources

    Vaccine Education Facts & Resources

    The most important thing you can do for your child is to arm yourself with information and facts.  If you have already decided that as a parent you believe vaccinations are not right for your child you can find information below on how to admit them into public school.  If you are currently researching vaccines and are unsure whether or not they are safe, or whether or not they make sense for your family, our best advice to you would be to hold off.

    Don’t continue vaccinating your child until you are 100% sure it is the right thing to do.  You can always continue vaccinating at a later date, but you can never, ever, take away the experience of injuring your child through dangerous chemicals and toxins being injected into their bloodstreams.   

    Here are some articles to start your research:

  • Spotty Logic: Mandated Chicken Pox Vaccine for school

    Spotty Logic: Mandated Chicken Pox Vaccine for school

    IDAHO PARENTS who choose to opt-out of the chicken pox vaccine have done so after careful risk versus benefit analysis. 
    VACCINE EXEMPTIONS PROTECT INFORMED CONSENT.

    1. The chicken pox is a benign, self limiting childhood illness. 99.9% of children suffer NO complications and gain life-time immunity. Not a single Idaho child has died from the disease (or complications) in more than a decade.
    2. CDC reports that the Chicken Pox vaccine is NOT effective long term adding a second dose due to waning immunization rates.
    3. Chicken Pox vaccines can cause serious injury or even death. 1 out of every 1,481 children administered the VACCINE suffered adverse reaction.
    4. Complications from the chicken pox disease are EXTREMELY RARE. 12 individuals per Million will have complications. Its a vaccine for convenience rather than for a deadly childhood disease.  Designed to keep parents at work and children in school but Medical Reports now show its not cost effective.

    1. Benign Childhood Illness experienced by the entire population as children PRIOR to 1995.

    CDC reports there were  3,700,000 cases of chicken pox cases EACH YEAR prior to the vaccine and 
    that there were 100 U.S. deaths each year (50 children and 50 adults)* the majority of those deaths had compromised immune systems or other health problems 
    The chance of complications resulting in death from chicken pox was .00002702 <source>1

    For 99.9 percent of healthy children, chickenpox is a mild disease without complications. However, up to 20 percent of adults who get chickenpox develop severe complications such as pneumonia, secondary bacterial infections, and brain inflammation (which is reported in less than one percent of children who get chickenpox). Most children and adults who develop these serious complications have compromised immune systems or other health problems.

    2. Chicken Pox Vaccine NOT effective long term with ‘immunity waning’ so that CDC now suggests a second dose. <source> 2

    We give our children the chicken pox vaccine. This vaccine required by many schools and daycares carries a limited protection from the illness and is not guaranteed effective. The vaccine itself contains a LIVE VIRUS which is KNOWN to spread chickenpox to others.
    How Effective is the chicken pox vaccine?

    • Chickenpox vaccine effectiveness is reported to be 44 percent for any form of the disease and 86 percent for moderate to severe disease;

    Consider this. 

    A close friend, has seven children at home. The teen was required to be ‘updated’ on his vaccines in Junior High because the CDC is now acknowledging that the vaccine ‘wears out’ over time. So, in order to continuing attending school activities, he received the chicken pox vaccine. Within days, his elder sibling came down with the illness. Unfortunately, she wasn’t aware that she was sick until she was away from home on her Senior Trip to Disneyland. The vaccine cause her to expose her entire class and those around her at Disneyland to the illness.  Arriving back home, contagious, she then spread the illness to younger siblings, many had already been vaccinated with chicken pox vaccine in the past several years.

    This one family’s story prove that:

    1. The chicken pox vaccine sheds and others do catch the chicken pox disease.
    2. The chicken pox vaccine is not always effective.

    3. Danger of complications from the chicken pox illness increased with age.

    Most concerning is that Chickenpox is much more serious when caught by previously unexposed adults, when it can lead to pneumonia.

    Mass use of chickenpox vaccine by children in the U.S. has removed natural boosting of immunity in the population, which was protective against shingles, and now adults are experiencing a shingles epidemic.

    From the story above its obvious, the vaccinated individual could spread the disease to the immuno-compromised, who can develop septicaemia or meningitis. 

    4. The vaccine is one of convenience, not about saving lives.

    Is chicken pox really dangerous? The estimated death rate for chicken pox is only 1.4 per 100,000 cases (0.0014%) in normal children. It rises to 30.9 deaths per I00,000c ases (0.0309%) in adults.
    As you can see,the death rate is still quite small. Although, it is FAR better to contract chicken pox as a child, than to wait until the adult years.

    Its worth noting chickenpox illness is more of a concern of economics than of deadly outbreak. Children are banned from childcare during the long course of the contagious window of chickenpox, a parent has to take up to a week or more off work to look after their afflicted kids at home.  The CDC and local health departments use the ‘time from work’ reason to have children vaccinated.

    5. Is the Chicken Pox Vaccine itself dangerous? YES.
    Some children will have life long injury from the vaccine itself.

    Chickenpox vaccine is already associated with adverse effects in one in 1,481 vaccinations.1

    Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of September 30, 2015 there had been 3,358 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with chickenpox and varicella-containing vaccines since 1990. Over half of those serious chickenpox vaccine-related adverse events occurring in children six years old and under. Of these chickenpox-vaccine related adverse event reports to VAERS, 161 were deaths, with over 60% of the deaths occurring in children under six years of age.
    visit NVIC for more important information about Chicken Pox Disease and Vaccine. 

    IDAHO PARENTS who choose to opt-out of the chicken pox vaccine have done so after careful risk verus benefit analysis. Idaho statue permits a parent’s choice, however, the Idaho Health and Welfare department chooses to attempt to harass and intimidate parents with their Immunization Exemption Form that falls FAR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE LAW.
    2.
    3.
  • Whooping Cough Vaccine FAIL mostly vaccinated in outbreaks

    Whooping Cough Vaccine FAIL mostly vaccinated in outbreaks

    Here is an actual study published by the CDC
    82% of vaccinated individuals got whooping cough

    found at https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2014.pdf

    -Number of un vaccinated children who had pertussis = 556

    -Number of vaccinated children who had pertussis = 2,950

    Obviously this proves vaccines aren’t as effective as they preach! With a strong immune system, pertussis can be cured naturally. So why inject our children’s bodies with poisons that are only assaulting that immune system? Chemicals do NOT strengthen the immune system. They destroy it! 

  • Vaccines, Aluminum and the ALLERGY connection

    Vaccines, Aluminum and the ALLERGY connection

    Researchers at the University of Virginia Health System’s Division of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology report that an era of food allergies that began with the post-millennial generation might be a response to vaccines containing the adjuvant alum, a known trigger for allergic traits. Alum is usually the name given to potassium aluminum sulfate when used in vaccines, the FDA states. Sometimes, aluminum hydroxide and even other forms of aluminum adjuvants are also referred to as alum in allergy research.

    In their article published in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the UVA team described their rationale for measuring the allergy responses of a patient — who had already demonstrated some food allergies to cow’s milk and peanuts — in relation to the administration of vaccines that contained alum.

    “The era of food allergy began with the post-millennial generation, the same faction who received new immunizations during early childhood. Many of these vaccines contain alum, an adjuvant known to induce allergic phenotypes.”

    The team measured the baby girl’s IgE (IU/mL) and IgG4 (mcg/mL) by ImmunoCAP. IgE, or Immunoglobulin E, are antibodies that are produced by the immune system in association with allergic responses, according to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, which states that people with allergies have immune systems that overreact to allergens by producing the IgE antibodies.

    IgG4 is one subclass of IgG, the most common form of antibody proteins in our bodies. IgG antibodies make up three-fourths of the antibodies in our blood at any time, but IgG4 is one of the least common of the IgG antibodies, accounting for a mere four percent of IgG in blood serum. They have a very unique structure, according to the medical journal, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, which explains that their biological role is still uncertain. It’s believed that IgG4 antibodies are driven, at least in part, by signaling molecules that regulate immunity, inflammation, and the process of creating new blood cells.

    The UVA researchers said that between the ages of 8- and 12-months, the baby’s total IgE had decreased in response to both peanut and cow’s milk by the time her one-year vaccinations were due, though the total IgE was still high enough that most people would show at least some allergy symptoms. At 12-months-old, the little girl got those one-year vaccinations. Three weeks later, her IgE antibodies sharply increased, almost doubling from 44.1 to 75.6. Her peanut antibodies increased from 11.2 to 16.5, and her milk antibodies increased from 2 to 5.06. Interestingly, in Allergy And Asthma Proceedings, a statistically significant association was declared between IgE antibody levels and the severity of eczema in atopic individuals.

    After this response, alum-containing vaccines were avoided. Four months after her 12-month vaccines, her total IgE decreased to 51, which was still higher than before her one-year vaccines were given. The baby had completely avoided peanuts, but her peanut-related antibodies continued to rise while all other IgE values decreased. The baby began cow’s milk oral desensitization about a month after turning one-year-old. Though her IgE antibodies related to cow’s milk didn’t increase, her IgG4 antibodies to the cow’s milk were “remarkably higher” after the desensitization therapy.

    The research team concluded that alum-containing vaccines increased IgE, and stated that this is something that they had already observed in their earlier research. The milk desensitation therapy somehow increased the milk-related IgG4, which they had also seen reported after peanut immunotherapy.

    Interestingly, another article, this one published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, reported that in order to study food allergies, specific genetically susceptible wild-mice were actually given egg white protein (ovalbumin) allergies by administering the protein at the same time as the adjuvant alum. Another article in the Korean Journal of Internal Medicine claimed that the “most simple and effective method of inducing an asthmatic reaction in a short period of time in mice” is to inject them with the both the egg white protein and the adjuvant alum two times, with the two injections spaced one week apart.

    Literature from the University of Auckland explains that some vaccines contain tiny amounts of aluminum salts, like alum, in order improve the immune response to those vaccines. That literature says that we are born with some aluminum in our bodies already and add to our stores “through eating, drinking, receiving some vaccines and taking some medicines.” Only a very small amount of aluminum ever enters our blood stream through digestion, according to that literature. When we eat aluminum, most of it comes out through our feces. That literature says that when aluminum enters our blood stream, it is mostly removed by our kidneys, but that a tiny amount can stay in our bodies and “is mainly stored in our bones, with some stored in our lungs and brain.” The University of Auckland literature says that more aluminum gets absorbed by our bloodstream from vaccines than by ingestion, but that the amount is very small, and it is mostly processed and removed.

    In the Journal of Immunotoxicology, researchers from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Northeastern University said that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines carry a risk of inducing these undesired, allergic responses, especially in people who are genetically predisposed to these types of responses from vaccines and to atopic diseases. These researchers wrote that they have found some genetic variants that might make people more susceptible to allergies being induced by aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, and pointed out that determining who may have these gene variants before vaccination could reduce the incidences of these unfortunate responses to vaccines.

    “Identification of these individuals may decrease the risk of adverse events associated with the use of aluminum-containing vaccines.”

    According to the CDC, alum is found in a handful of vaccines at the same time that potential allergens are.

    In Comvax, a vaccine used to protect against Hib and hepatitis B, both soy and yeast are potential allergens that are injected at the same time as alum during vaccination. 
    In the hepatitis B vaccine Recombivax, yeast protein and soy are also found in the same injection as alum. According to the World Allergy Organization Journal, vaccines approved for human use in the U.S. that contain aluminum adjuvants include some Hib conjugate vaccines, DTaP vaccines, all combination DTaP, Tdap, and Hib vaccines, hepatitis B vaccines, hepatitis A vaccines, HPV vaccines, anthrax vaccines and rabies vaccines.

    The UVA research team involved in compiling the article that linked food allergies with alum found in certain vaccines consisted of highly-respected allergy and immunology specialists, including Dr. Scott P. Commins, who worked as as Associate Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics at UVA and is now an Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of North Carolina Allergy & Immunology Clinic, Dr. Alice E. W. Hoyt of UVA Allergy and Immunology, Alexander J. Schuyler of UVA, asthma and allergy specialist Dr. Peter W. Heymann, who leads UVA’s Heymann laboratory which is part of the Division of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine at the university, and Dr. Thomas A.E. Platts-Mills, who is a Professor of Medicine and Microbiology at UVA who completed his residency at Johns Hopkins University.

    The UVA team presented their findings in March this year at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology’s annual meeting in Los Angeles. Currently, a team at UVA is working on a new study looking for increases in food allergies after the hepatitis B, DTaP, Hib, PCV 13, and hepatitis A vaccines, all of which the study’s researchers say contain alum.

  • CDC GRANTS ITSELF MORE POWER to aprehend, detain, force treatment with 2017 QUARANTINE RULES

    CDC GRANTS ITSELF MORE POWER to aprehend, detain, force treatment with 2017 QUARANTINE RULES

    Last Fall Health Freedom Idaho called upon everyone to comment on the new proposed rule created by the CDC to GIVE the CDC more power and control in the process for apprehending and identifying people with contagious diseases, and the issuance of federal orders for quarantine, isolation, and conditional release were closely questioned by many of those who responded to the proposed rules.  The rule becomes effective this month. 

    Listen to Idaho Public Radio and their discussion

    How Will the New CDC Rules for Quarantine and Isolation Affect You?

    There are new U.S. government rules that can force travelers into quarantine or isolation if they are suspected of having a contagious disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published their revised rules explaining how they will intervene to protect the public from the spread of quarantinable communicable diseases such as Ebola.

    For those of us who prefer to minimize our contact with the conventional medical care system and its pharmaceutical products, these new rules should cause us to carefully consider our health status when traveling across state lines or traveling back to the United States during a CDC health emergency. If we have symptoms of illness that might be confused with a communicable disease, then it might be wise to carefully consider our travel plans.

    The rules were released on the last day of the Obama Administration, 1/19/2017, and will take effect on February 21, 2017. 

    The 4 problems with the CDC Rule: <From HealthAffairs.Org >

    1. First, the proposed regulation permits indefinite detention without the issuance of a formal public health order and with absolutely no due process protections. 
    Though the CDC has noted that it “does not expect that the typical public health apprehension will last longer than 72 hours,” the proposed regulations place no limit on how long officials may detain an individual while deciding whether to formally quarantine or isolate her.

    That means that a future administration could hold travelers—either returning from abroad at the airport or traveling across state lines—in government custody for days or weeks without providing an explanation or an opportunity for the individuals to challenge their detentions. The CDC must constrain this power by placing an upper limit of hours—not days—on the period under which government officials may detain an individual without serving a written order of quarantine or isolation. This reform is required by the Constitution and is sound policy, given that the threat of indefinite apprehension will serve as an impediment to recruiting volunteer health care workers.

    2. Second, the proposed regulation fails to clearly state that the federal government will not issue public health orders that restrict individuals’ liberty unless these orders are necessary and there are no less restrictive ways to protect public health.

    For example, during the last Ebola outbreak some states monitored the health of travelers returning from West Africa through daily check-ins by phone with a public health official, which is less restrictive than quarantine and proved just as effective. The Constitution prohibits the government from placing more onerous restrictions on individual liberties than is necessary—as determined by sound scientific evidence—to protect the public from the threat of disease.

    3. Third, the proposed regulation fails to guarantee quarantined individuals speedy access to courts, which provide an important check on the misuse of government power by ensuring that the government makes an adequate showing of scientific necessity. 
    Currently, the proposed regulations would allow a future administration to quarantine an individual for three days without providing any legal or medical justification for the quarantine before a neutral decision maker. Yet under the Constitution, absent emergency circumstances, the federal government must provide an individual with legal notice and an opportunity to be heard at a hearing before the government restricts the individual’s liberty. In emergency situations, the government must hold this hearing before a neutral decision maker within 72 hours of initiating the quarantine.

    4. Fourth, the proposed regulations would allow a future administration to perform any ‘medical examination’—no matter how invasive—without the individual’s consent, so long as the testing is “reasonably necessary to diagnose or confirm the presence or extent of infection.” 
    In fact, nowhere in the text of the proposed regulations does the CDC address issues of consent. Informed consent is a fundamental principle of medical ethics that should not be violated absent extraordinary circumstances in which no other alternative exists. Because placing an individual in isolated detention will always provide an alternative to a non-consensual, invasive medical examination, we can imagine no situation in which the CDC would be ethically (or legally) warranted in conducting a medical examination against an individual’s will.
    To prevent a future administration from violating the bodily integrity and autonomy of citizens through forced examinations, the CDC must explicitly require informed consent for all medical examinations and treatment, with the option of voluntary isolation in lieu of such procedures.

    In The News:

    How comfortable are you with these new protocols? 15,800 commented on the rules about their concerns, did you?

  • Label Check: We read the label for what we ingest. Time we did for what we inject.

    Label Check: We read the label for what we ingest. Time we did for what we inject.

    Informed Consent is the permission granted in the knowledge of the possible consequences, typically that which is given by a patient to a doctor for treatment with full knowledge of the possible risks and benefits. Health Freedom Idaho supports a individual’s right to informed consent and vaccine choice for families.  

    Find out about the common ingredients of vaccines, including formaldehyde, thiomersal, mercury, antibiotics, gelatin and adjuvants.

    Discover the ingredients in the vaccines that your doctor recommends. These trace amounts of toxins accumulate in our bodies causing devastation to our health. 

    Vaccine Ingredients and Manufacturer Information
    (alphabetical order by vaccine)

    I. VACCINES AND INGREDIENTS read vaccine inserts
    1. Adenovirus
    24. Polio
    25. Rabies
    27. Rubella
    31. Typhoid
  • Vaccine Manufacturers GUILTY of FRAUD

    Vaccine Manufacturers GUILTY of FRAUD


    Should we be concerned? Every US Manufacturer/supplies of pediatric vaccines has pled GUILTY to fraud within the last 5 years.

    PRINTABLE FRAUD FINDINGS for Each Vaccine Manufacturer
    US Vaccine Manufacturers as listed by the CDC

    • MERCK: 
      “Merck has been involved in a long federal lawsuit with allegations of fraud over the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine, in a case filed back in 2010 by two whistleblowers, virologists who worked for Merck. Merck has apparently tried hard to get this case thrown out of court, and keep this news out of the media, but late in 2014 a federal judge finally ruled that the case is to move forward.” more
    • United States of America vs. Merck (2:10-CV-04374-CDJ) is a current case in which former virologists, now whistleblowers, allege Merck falsified data with regards to the efficacy of the MMRII vaccine. 

    Sanofi-Aventis US LLC is facing a consumer fraud class action lawsuit kickbacks and over billingNY Times reports:

    Wall Street Journal: Did Merck Unfairly Monopolize the Market for a Mumps Vaccine?
    “The ultimate victims here are the millions of children who, every year, are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection,” the lawsuit filed by the virologists states. And while federal health officials have said the disease was supposed to have been eradicated by now, “the failure of Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.” Meanwhile, the mumps vaccine was ringing the register at Merck, which reported that sales reached $621 million last year, when including both the MMR II vaccine – which is mumps, measles and rubella – and the ProQuad vaccine, a combination product that is also used to thwart chickenpox, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.
    Pennsylvania Eastern District Court, Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ
    District Judge C. DARNELL JONES, II, presiding

    Concerned Citizens of California OPPOSE SB277, which mandates a rigid vaccine schedule for ALL children who do not possess a medical exemption.

    United States of America vs. Merck (2:10-CV-04374-CDJ) is a current case in which former virologists, now whistleblowers, allege Merck falsified data with regards to the efficacy of the MMRII vaccine. 

    #CDCWhistleblower #VaxFraud 

    Quantcast

  • Vaccines and Religious Exemption

    Vaccines and Religious Exemption

    Vaccine Exemptions Protect Religious Liberty.  The development of vaccine on the bodies of more than 80 aborted human beings, convicts individuals, from a variety of religious backgrounds, AGAINST the injection of abortion tainted vaccines including MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), Chicken Pox and Hep A. All three vaccines (and more) are required for public, private, religious-based school enrollment.
    Preserving the religious exemption of vaccines for both school and employment protects our individual liberty. SB 1050 will clarify statute to allow parents to invoke their legal right to vaccine exemption without intimidation and discrimination.
     
    Has anyone told you they didn’t believe we could possibly have vaccines produced right here in America from aborted fetal cell lines?  Did anyone tell you it was a hoax?


    The fact that the Chickenpox, Hepatitis-A and MMR vaccines were developed using aborted fetal cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 has never been hidden from the public.  The problem is that when parents go to their family doctors for vaccinations, who asks to see the product insert?  The one sheet flyer given to parents doesn’t list most of the possible side effects and none of the vaccine ingredients. Doctors, who have been administering the vaccines for years have never checked into the ingredients, although it has always been right at their fingertips.  And what would happen if they did?  They would read that the vaccine contains “residual DNA and proteins” and “components” of “MRC-5″, “WI-38″ (or both) “human diploid cell lines”.

    Click here for the Manufacturer’s package insert portion describing the fetal cell lines.



    SUMMARY: 
    The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. MRC-5 is a known source of human DNA in vaccines.

    The WI-38 human diploid cell line (RA 273) was a 16-week-old female baby (20 cm long) who was aborted in Sweden because the parents felt they had too many children. The baby was packed on ice and sent to the United States (speculation suggests without consent – which was common) where it was dissected. The use of WI-38 cells is a lucrative moneymaking business.

    The rubella vaccine currently used in the U.S. and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak. Eighty elective abortions (recorded) were involved in the research and final production of the current rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.”

    “PER C6 came from a healthy 18 week-old baby who was aborted for social reasons. This tumorigenic strain is being used to develop adenovirus, Ebola, influenza, malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV vaccines. Developers call it a “human designer cell” but what they really mean is “aborted baby cells.”

    The HEK293 cell line is derived from the kidneys of a healthy aborted fetus and is being used to develop new influenza vaccines.

    IMR-90 cell line came from a 16-week old female aborted baby 
    IMR-91 came from a male aborted baby. Both were created for vaccine production and functional references.

    WI-44 was derived from the lung of a three-month old surgically aborted fetus.

    WALVAX2 – Fetal cell line developed to replace MRC-5 and WI-38 because they are becoming too tumorigenic (causing too much cancer in children who receive vaccines made from them).
    You can’t be pro-life and pro-vaccine.
    #VaxXed #Truth #Science

    Which Vaccines contain Human DNA from Aborted Fetal Cells? (printable)
    find out more


    No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:

    Editorials on Vaccine and Religion:

    Vaccines: a Religious Contention
    article on various tenants of faith and their reaction to aborted fetal cell vaccines

    Vaccine Risk Awareness
    article from UK on Catholic faith and aborted fetal cells and vaccines


    OPEN LETTER to ALL RELIGIOUS LEADERS in CALIFORNIA  RE: SB277 Government Mandated Vaccines for all children

    <printable verison>
    Printable Copy of the article: Vaccines, Abortion and Fetal Tissue

    Helpful Resources:

    Vaccine Summary sheet from vaccine rights attorney, Alan Phillips:  http://us8.campaign-archive1.com/?u=e05b7d7adb6e660d8cf0748f9&id=4f92ecc522&e=e4e3fa348e  (2nd link once you click this)

    The movie Silent Epidemic,  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4


    MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ABORTED FETAL CELL SOURCES:

    Taken from the Coriell Cell Repository, a company that actually sells fetal (and other) tissue cell lines, is a complete scientific description of the cell lines and the information on the original abortions:

    MRC-5  Aborted Fetal Cell Line       
    WI-38 Aborted Fetal Cell Line

    More Aborted Fetal Cell Lines Used in Products and Product Testing

    PER C6 & HEK-293      
    IMR-90 and IMR-91

    And there is a plethora of information on many more abortions that were part of polio vaccine research.

    Read the document excerpts from the scientists themselves.