Unfortunately Idaho’s Health Code 39-414 grants staggering power to a select few, influencing every aspect of your life without you even realizing it. Imagine a world where compliance with health mandates could determine life-saving medical care access or even authorize separating families and shutting down businesses. Shocking, right? This isn’t a dystopian vision; it’s a sobering reality staring us in the face.
H 525 would amend Section 39-414, the Idaho Code, which defines the powers and duties of the boards of Idaho’s seven health districts. The current statute says the boards have the duty to “do all things required for the preservation and protection of the public health and preventive health. …” Health Freedom Idaho is calling for a balanced approach of changing the wording to what is necessary is reasonable as this demands accountability. Safeguarding individual rights.
Can you believe the power our health districts have? It’s kind of crazy how they can make decisions that affect every part of our lives. We saw how a few individuals could destroy long standing businesses and companies by from shutting down the small shops (but allowing big box stores to operate). The health districts attempted to limit our freedom to travel, our ability to attend religious services and even took away our children’s ability to play at the park and attend school.
The Power to DO ALL THINGS is overly broad. Health Freedom Idaho is calling for a balanced approach of changing the wording to what is necessary is reasonable as this demands accountability. Safeguarding individual rights.
Picture this: following health mandates could end up deciding who gets life-saving medical care or, worse, splitting up families and closing down businesses. It’s not some dystopian nightmare; it’s happening right now.
We’re not just sitting around complaining, though. We’re rolling up our sleeves to tackle this issue in the 2024 Legislative Session. And guess what? We can’t do it alone.
Contact your legislators and demand amendments to Idaho Code 39-414 that establish clear boundaries for health districts, ensuring that their actions are proportionate to the situation.
Share your concerns with your friends, family, and community, encouraging them to join the cause.
Stay informed and engaged with organizations and advocacy groups committed to safeguarding your rights and freedoms.
Idaho’s Cloud Seeding and Weather Modification: Addressing Concerns and Seeking Transparency
Watch this video of Miste Karlfeldt discussing the Idaho Water Resource Board and Cloud Seeding in Idaho with Dr. Daniel Bobinski of True Idaho News
In Idaho, cloud seeding and weather modification programs have raised legitimate concerns among residents who question whether we are unwitting subjects of experimental weather manipulation and what potential health impacts might arise from seeding our skies with chemicals that eventually return to earth. These concerns deserve thoughtful consideration, Health Freedom Idaho is calling for transparency and accountability in exposing our family’s potential health risks.
Residents have every right to question whether cloud seeding amounts to experimental weather manipulation. While cloud seeding is a recognized weather modification technique, it is crucial that these programs are conducted responsibly, with transparency, and within the bounds of established regulations. The Idaho Water Resource Board, responsible for overseeing such activities, must ensure that cloud seeding programs are based on sound scientific principles and are carried out with the utmost care. On September 6, 2023, they conducted a public meeting.
Health Impacts and Chemicals
One of the primary concerns centers around the chemicals used in cloud seeding, specifically silver iodide and calcium chloride. These substances, when released into the atmosphere, can return to the earth’s surface and potentially affect our environment, including our food, pets, and children. Idaho residents are subjects of comprehensive monitoring and research.
Those individuals responsible for weather modification do not completely understand the extent of these potential impacts. Does that concern you?
While silver iodide is generally considered safe when used in small quantities for cloud seeding, there are potential negative impacts and concerns associated with its use. These concerns include:
Environmental Impact: One of the primary concerns is the potential environmental impact of silver iodide. When released into the atmosphere, silver iodide particles can eventually fall to the ground and enter the environment. Accumulation of silver in soil and water bodies can be harmful to aquatic life and terrestrial ecosystems.
Water Contamination: Silver iodide can find its way into water bodies, potentially contaminating surface waters. Elevated silver levels in water can be toxic to aquatic organisms and disrupt ecosystems.
Human Health Concerns: While the concentrations of silver iodide used in cloud seeding are generally low and not considered harmful to human health, there are concerns about the potential inhalation of silver iodide particles. Inhaling silver iodide dust could potentially lead to respiratory irritation, although this risk is minimal under normal cloud seeding operations.
Ethical and Legal Concerns: Some individuals and communities raise ethical concerns about cloud seeding, including questions about informed consent and whether weather modification should be carried out without the consent of affected parties.
Unintended Consequences: The practice of cloud seeding aims to increase precipitation in specific regions, but there can be unintended consequences. Altering weather patterns through cloud seeding may affect downstream regions, potentially leading to water resource conflicts or other unintended impacts.
Effects on Local Climate: Altering local weather patterns through cloud seeding could have unforeseen effects on the climate and ecosystems of the targeted areas. These long-term effects require careful consideration and study.
Lack of Long-Term, Comprehensive Studies
There is a lack of comprehensive, long-term studies on the environmental and health impacts of silver iodide from cloud seeding. More research is needed to understand the full extent of potential negative effects. The call for long-term, comprehensive studies on the safety and efficacy of cloud seeding is entirely valid. To date, there remains a scarcity of in-depth research that can conclusively determine the practice’s impact on our environment and human health and its effectiveness in increasing precipitation. Transparency in sharing such studies when they become available is imperative to address public concerns. How do they conduct these studies without subjecting us to exposure to assess the risks?
Number of Cloud Seeding Stations: Idaho currently has multiple cloud seeding stations throughout the state. These stations work in collaboration with various weather modification programs and agencies to enhance precipitation in areas facing water scarcity.
Understanding Man’s Impact on Weather Systems: The extent of humanity’s impact on natural weather systems remains a subject of ongoing scientific study. Weather modification programs like cloud seeding are designed to enhance precipitation within the natural variability of weather patterns. Determining a direct link between cloud seeding and specific weather events, such as the “snowpocalypse” of 2015, is a complex challenge that requires comprehensive research and analysis.
The concerns of Idaho residents regarding cloud seeding and weather modification are valid and must be addressed. Transparency, rigorous research, and responsible oversight are essential to ensure that these programs are conducted safely and within the bounds of ethical and environmental considerations. It is our collective responsibility to advocate for transparency, engage in informed dialogue, and seek answers to legitimate questions as we navigate the complex realm of weather modification in Idaho. Only when citizens express concern and interest through open dialogue and call for transparent practices can we ensure the well-being of our communities and the preservation of our environment.
Susan Lang was found guilty of disturbing the peace for protesting Covid lockdowns. What does this mean for our 1st Amendment rights? Miste Karlfeldt of Health Freedom Idaho interviews Susan and discusses the upcoming sentencing on August 17, 2021
Daniel was taken by CPS from his dad, who has been homeless and has not given Daniel the meds, treatment, or care that Daniel needs for his autism. Thea lives in AZ, has crippling rheumatoid arthritis, and has now had a stroke due to the stress. Her next hearing is Aug 1st, and she is in desperate need of an attorney not on the government, taxpayer-funded payroll. Please donate what you can so she can hire the attorney she has chosen for her case. Time is of the essence.
Today was a VERY BUSY DAY. Here is the run down and a summary of what happened. All the bills brought to the Ways and Means Committee were printed and then distributed to other committees for debate and voting. The good bills, such as H411, were assigned to the Health and Welfare Committee. Chairman Fred Wood HID all day long so as not to be seen by the public. He showed up at 5 pm just before adjournment of the House. He has not called the Health and Welfare Committee to convene to allow the bills to be heard.
This is a critical power play. Without the Health and Welfare Committee hearing the bills they will simply die. Learn more from Miste, Sarah and Glenneda in this quick update:
We will do our best to keep you updated: Check our channel: https://t.me/hfidaho
Bills are being added to committee schedules as of publication. The public is supposed to receive 24 hours to review the bills and suppose to be given the option of testimony on the bill. Already we are seeing they are limiting testimony to 30 minutes from the public. They haven’t provided even an hour to review the bills they are voting upon. To keep up with what is going on in the Legislature it’s important to visit the Legislative Website on a regular basis.
House Voted to Censure Lt.Col. & Representative Priscilla Giddings.
Lt. Col and Representative Priscilla Giddings, champion of truth. Her testimony was powerful and compelling but fell on mostly deaf ears. She showed her superstar command of presence in hostile territory. A true hero of the people. – Darr Moon
Green Voted for the Censure of Giddings and removal from Committee
TAKE ACTION TO PROTECT YOUR FREEDOM
TELL LEGISLATORS TO VOTE YES ON H 411
TELL HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN THAT YOU WANT IT TO CONVENE TO BE HEARD :
This is a very promising bill that adds a section to the legal code that prevents individuals from being discriminated against due to vaccine mandates. It also protects all, including our children, from forced vaccinations. View this bill in full here:
As a pro-life Christian, I believe that human beings are created by God in His image. Therefore every person, from conception to natural death, possesses inherent dignity and immeasurable worth – including preborn children.
As a Christian, then, I am called to defend, protect, and value all human life.
In the area of vaccines, some Christians and ministries have unknowingly taken positions in contradiction to their own core value of the sanctity of human life, and have based those positions on intentionally deceptive and incorrect information promoted by the industry itself.
These vaccine developers didn’t just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue in order to develop their products.
An aborted baby boy was also used as spare parts in the production of vaccines. His designation is MRC-5 – let’s call him Michael. Michael’s 27- year old mother was ‘given an abortion’ for psychological reasons…
Did that mother suffering from mental health issues have a choice? Certainly – The babies didn’t.
Their bodies were sacrificed at the altar of science and justified by our CHURCHES and Christian Organizations under the guise of ”good for mankind.”
During the rubella outbreak in Philadelphia in 1964 doctors convinced pregnant women that they had been exposed to rubella – the 3-day measles and that their baby would be born horribly deformed if they continued with their pregnancy.
Mothers were exploited and Manipulated by FEAR,
And they allowed the murder of their child.
NOT 2 NOR 5, NOT 10 or 20
But 26 mothers aborted their babies at the direction of their doctors.
Their aborted babies’ bodies were immediately sent to the science labs of Dr. Stanley Plotkin.
When researchers dissected the aborted fetuses it was then determined that these precious human beings were HEALTHY -uninfected..sacrificed in vain…Unusable for their medical research and product development.
The 27th baby was infected. RA273. Rubella-abortus-27th – 3rd tissue sample that contained the live rubella virus.
And although he had successfully isolated the virus that would eventually be used in the rubella vaccine on the market today, it didn’t stop there. In subsequent research papers, Dr. Plotkin noted another 40 aborted babies were dissected to obtain further virus samples.
This means there were at least 67 babies electively aborted just to obtain the virus for the rubella vaccine.
But they STILL had to culture the virus – on the bodies of even MORE aborted babies.
The bodies of 32 ‘elective abortions’ produced the final WI-38 cell line. Are you counting? We are up to 99 aborted babies.
**As a mother – the lives of the previous two were enough to stop vaccinating. Do the 99 sacrificial lives give you pause?
I don’t vaccinate because of my firmly held moral objection to abortion tainted vaccines. I don’t vaccinate because of my religious beliefs.
And now mandates are here. We have to choose between feeding our families or taking a product developed with child sacrifice. We can clearly see that the school mandates are coming for our children.
July 9, 2021, Idaho’s largest health care provider announces COVID-19 vaccine mandates for all their staff, volunteers, and vendors.
Three of Idaho’s largest health care providers announced Thursday that they would require staff, volunteers, and employees to be vaccinated with the emergency use authorized COVID-19 vaccine. Our healthcare workers have been our front-line workers and essential employees. Many already contracted COVID and survived and likely have long-term immunity. To meet the deadlines set by their organization, those workers would need to start the vaccination process anywhere from late July to mid-September, depending on their employer’s rule and which vaccine they choose. “This has left numerous employees with these major health care companies with little recourse for not wanting to take the emergency use authorized vaccine,” Lt. Governor Janice McGeachin wrote.
Last year, we witnessed and experienced unprecedented events. Actions were taken by government agencies and officials which directly impacted our way of life. The official story is one of a deadly novel virus of unknown origin, sweeping its way through the world, choosing victims at random, and taking nearly 600,000 lives… All while medical professionals and world leaders did their best to keep us safe and develop life-saving vaccines due to the lack of viable treatment options.
The following presentation was given on Friday, July 9th, 2021.
Much of the public is generally unaware of the reality of what has taken place over the past year and a half. It is of vital importance that we stop and question the information we’re being given. Any new claims made by our government regulatory agencies and the news media should be heavily scrutinized and investigated.
Please share this information with friends and family.
Data released July 9, 2021, show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and July 2, 2021, a total of 438,441 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 9,048 deaths — an increase of 2,063 over the previous week. There were 41,015 serious injuries reported during the same time period — up 6,950 compared with last week.
Several major Idaho employers, including St. Luke’s, St. Alphonsus, and Primary Care have stated that they will now discriminate based on their employees’ personal health choices. This is wrong and needs to be made explicitly illegal. The Governor of Idaho protected the jobs of State Employees from being affected by their COVID-19 vaccination status with Executive Order 2021-04, but this does nothing to protect those who work for someone other than the State of Idaho.
No one should be forced to choose between keeping their job and undergoing a medical procedure that violates their bodily autonomy, especially one which lacks long-term data, has inherent risk, and is still only under experimental use authorization.
WE THE PEOPLE need to stand side by side with our healthcare professionals and NOT permit their employers to coerce them into vaccine mandates! Now more than ever, we need to rise up and say NO!
The forced masking of Idaho students violates ID Law. Find out how to support the fight against a school boards’ illegal power grab.
Basin School District No 72 in Boise County, Idaho is enforcing a mask mandate in violation of state law. If students don’t wear a mask, they cannot attend school in person or ride the bus.
The Governor, State Department of Health and Welfare, local health district, county and city have all refused to require face coverings.
Idaho City High School parents and students have filed suit in Boise County, Idaho alleging that this violates parental rights, religious liberties, informed consent and Idaho law and causes grave harm to Idaho students.
Where does the school district get the authority to make law and force health decisions upon students against the wishes of the parents?
Attorney who overturned Little’s stage 1 church order pursues Basin school dist. THIS is the lawsuit Idaho needs.
Please contribute and support the efforts to stop the abuse of Idaho children by elected officials at AllFundIt.com and remember to pray for us. We need and desire wisdom and discretion.
Please help support these courageous parents and students fight back against dictatorial and Marxist school board trustees and superintendents by donating here through AllFundIt or mailing a check or money order to Boyles Law at 217 Cedar Street, Suite 312, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 PO Box 1242, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864.
Perhaps a publicity stunt gone wrong. The CHI Memorial Hospital in Tennessee broadcasts vaccinating several members of their healthcare management teams. During our live stream of the drug injections at CHI Memorial, Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover while speaking to the media about receiving the drug injection mentioned she started feeling dizzy. SHE FAINTED 17 minutes AFTER SHOOTING UP. Thankfully one of the doctors behind her caught her.
A SECOND Alaska healthcare worker has an allergic reaction to Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine just one day after another staff member at the same hospital went into anaphylactic shock.
Anaphylactic shock is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction to an allergy from food, medicine, vaccine or even a type of material.
The immune system releases chemicals that flood the body, blood pressure suddenly drops, and airways narrow, which prevents someone from breathing normally.
Symptoms usually occur within minutes and include hives, a weak pulse, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and a swollen tongue or throat.
A second healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered an allergic reaction after getting Pfizer Inc’s coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday.
He experienced symptoms such as eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat, which resolved in an hour after being given Benadryl. His reaction was less serious than another healthcare worker from the same hospital who went into anaphylactic shock on Tuesday.
She is currently hospitalized and it is unclear when she will be discharged. The woman hasno known history of allergies.
Dec 18 updated:
to reveal now a THIRD significant reaction
So this unfortunate soul went to get a medical product injected into their body to SUPPOSEDLY “prevent” them from getting a medical issue only to GET A MEDICAL ISSUE. Oh, and what guarantee do they have that they’re protected? ZERO guarantees!! Fairtrade?
I wonder how many of these instances are occurring that are NOT making it into mainstream media reporting? Hmm.
By the way, wait until this Covid vaccine victim finds out that whatever medical bills they are incurring to address this crisis ARE NOT COVERED by the medical professional that administered the vaccine, the vaccine maker, or the government agency that suggested getting the shot was a good idea!
The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered. It led the U.K.’s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine.
What’s in the Vaccine causing allergic reactions?
After the reactions, the U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a warning that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not be given the vaccine.
About 32 million Americans have food allergies, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. It’s unknown how many have drug allergies.
No such warning has been issued in the U.S.
In fact, last weekend, the CDC said Americans with serious allergies can be immunized as long as they are monitored for 30 minutes after getting the shot.
However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requiring Pfizer to monitor for anaphylaxis in the U.S. and submit data, according to The New York Times, which first reported the reaction. *So this first wave of vaccine recipients are our most valuable healthcare workers and also participating in safety trials.
The agency has also advised people with allergies to consult with their physicians to ensure they are not allergic to any components of the vaccine.
All right folks, be sure to tell your doctor if you have had an allergic reaction to an injection of the following...
Adverse Reactions Will Determine if the Vaccine is Safe
The CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system. Do you realize what this means?
You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.
Perhaps that’s why some healthcare workers are FAKING injections.
“As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC
Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, I would like to point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀 https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna Covid 19 vaccine…
-45 participants age 18-55 -20 participants age 56-70 -20 participants age 71 or older -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
