Workplaces have begun the roll-out of mandated vaccines, even before the FDA approval. Could employees request a religious exemption due to the fact that all COVID 19 vaccines were developed, produced and/or tested from aborted fetal cell lines? Is an exemption necessary since it’s illegal to mandate a vaccine prior to FDA approval? What about when the vaccines ARE approved?
IT WAS OBVIOUS VACCINE MANDATES WHY DIDN’T THE LEGISLATURE PROTECT THE CITIZENS?
During the 2021 Session, HFI supported the civil rights bill House Bill 140 MEDICAL CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT – which added to existing law to prohibit discrimination against certain persons on the basis of their vaccination status and to prohibit state contracts with companies that engage in such discrimination. After it overwhelmingly passed the House, Senator Jim Patrick was instructed by Blue Cross of Idaho and IACI to deny the bill a public hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee. The will of the people to secure our liberty and bodily autonomy was crushed by one bought man’s actions. Senators on the Commerce committee argued and argued for the bill to be brought out and publicly debated. Chairman Patrick refused. Jim Patrick, the injuries and possible deaths that may occur in the hospital employee population is the blood that will partially be on your hands. You failed Idaho with your cowardice and your love of power and money.
Senator Patrick did not protect our healthcare workers when he had the opportunity.
CALL TO ACTION: SENATOR PATRICK refused to allow a hearing for people’s bill (H140) The Medical Consumer Protection Act because of his connections to Pharma and the insurance industry. The ramifications to people’s livelihoods and healthcare are partially on his hands. Please let him know how the jab requirements will affect you, your family, your health, and your livelihood. mailto: JPatrick@senate.idaho.gov Call +12087336897
YES, THE COVID-19 VACCINES UTILIZE ABORTED FETAL MATERIAL.
Coronavirus vaccines developed in the States and globally were made from the cell lines of aborted children — healthy children who were murdered. Most notably, this includes a fetal cell line called HEK-293, from the kidney of a healthy girl aborted in 1972, and PER.C6, from the retina of a healthy boy aborted in 1985. As a Christian, Can I Take a Vaccine Made from Aborted Babies?This moral dilemma is answered by John Piper founder and teacher of DesiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary.
While the issue of aborted fetal cell line use in vaccine production is now widely discussed, there are few places that document each of these cell lines and the abortions performed to develop them from primary and official sources.
As of 16 May 2020, using mostly primary sources available on the internet, NODECEPTION.ORG documented that at least 181 abortions have been performed to develop fetal cell lines for the manufacturing of a variety of our vaccines, including the Covid-19 vaccines currently being used and those in development. Details on all the cell lines are documented here.
SoundChoice.org produced an accurate chart reflecting the COVID vaccines likely to be used in the U.S. that utilized aborted fetal material.
IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.
LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOV Section 18-611FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
MY JOB IS REQUIRING THE VACCINE! NOW WHAT?
Visit HealthFreedomDefense.org, a plethora of Resources can be found there. Most people don’t understand that the masks that are being used, the tests that are being forced on people, and the vaccines are being forced on people. We knew this was coming.
“What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” – Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense
DOES THE SUPREMECY CLAUSE PROVIDE PROTECTION?
It’s Federal Law Title 21 section 360bbb-3. In the constitution is the Supremacy Clause. What the Supremacy Clause means is that no city, state, county, or whatever can implement a law, ordinance, or anything else that conflicts with the Federal Law. The Federal Law preempts local law. We have it right there in black and white that these products, all of them, are issued under Emergency Use Authorization and that we’re required to be informed of the problems with them, known and unknown, and also informed of the right to refuse. What people can do is they can download those forms, whether it’s a mask, a test or the vaccine, and provide the notice. There are two things on there. There’s an FAQ for the masks, tests, and vaccines. There’s a notice to employers for each of those. My law firm is sending those letters to employers.
In other words, are you implying that mandating the vaccine is illegal? A workplace can’t say, “You must be vaccinated to work here.” “I’m not implying it. We are going to be litigating it.”
Interview with Leslie Manookian
Leslie: “What I’m encouraging people to do is to download those forms, print them, or email them to their employers if they’re being threatened and say, “This is Federal Law and you can’t do this.” Health Freedom Defense is trying to develop a network of lawyers to whom we can refer people who understand the law and can fight on their behalf.”
About Leslie Manookian
Leslie Manookian established the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) to ameliorate health injustice through education and advocacy. Health Freedom Defense aids families and individuals whose health rights have been infringed and supports legal challenges to unjust laws that undermine our health and freedoms. Of primary concern to HFDF is challenging a mandatory COVID vaccine.
WITH KNOWN RISKS, SHOULDN’T THERE BE A CHOICE?
Researchers around the world are voicing their concerns about the potential immediate and long-term side-effects of these rushed vaccines, including the possibility of infertility in females.
Everyone needs to be personally responsible for their own health and should research the COVID-19 vaccines in development carefully before making a decision whether or not to vaccinate without coercion by employers.
Individuals who are suffering adverse effects: Vax Long Haulers and www.c19vaxreactions.com A certain percentage of people – in the thousands – who had the covid vaccine are suffering from debilitating symptoms. Our lives, in many cases, have been ruined with terrifying symptoms, leaving many of us with the inability to work. The widespread general denial – even bullying – of those facing symptoms is making matters worse. Bitchute channel, and is also on the Rumble channel.
IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT
There is within Idaho Statute the protection of freedom of choice when it comes to medical decisions.
The development of vaccines, using the harvested organs of aborted human beings, violates the moral conviction of many individuals from a variety of religious backgrounds. The fact that vaccines were created on the bodies of aborted babies has never been hidden. Recently the “major religions” leaders have come out saying that injecting yourself for your health protection with a product developed on the bodies of murdered innocent humans is morally acceptable.
RELIGIOUS LEADERS CLAIM ABORTION TAINTED VACCINES ARE MORALLY ACCEPTABLE
It’s hard to believe that organizations/religions that claim to be ‘pro-life’ Focus on the Family, and the Catholic Church are promoting the use of vaccines even with the evidence that aborted human beings were used in the manufacturer and development. They believe that vaccines were created on the bodies of sacrificed innocent human beings and tested on pregnant women, orphans and possibly severely disabled individuals are ‘morally acceptable’ and prudent.Begs the question – is this what Jesus would do?
Coronavirus vaccines developed in the States and globally were made from the cell lines of aborted children — healthy children who were murdered. Most notably, this includes a fetal cell line called HEK-293, from the kidney of a healthy girl aborted in 1972, and PER.C6, from the retina of a healthy boy aborted in 1985. Apparently, these and similar cell lines have been used since the 1960s to manufacture vaccines against rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis A, shingles, hemophilia, rheumatoid arthritis, and cystic fibrosis. (and others)
Interview with John Piper Founder & Teacher, desiringGod.org
Those who believe in a righteous and just God must remember we must each stand before our creator give an account of our own. There will not be an opportunity to hide behind the robes of religious authorities during the righteous judgment of God.
My questions to believers: Can Christians, fearful of viruses, ignore the child sacrifice used to create a technology in order to ‘benefit’ from it? Can the GOD we trust, honor our use of this “medical product” to keep us “healthy”? NO! God will not honor this medical product built on child sacrifice for our protection, it is counter to his holy character!
ISN’T GOD CAPABLE OF PROTECTING US WHILE WE ABSTAIN FROM THE USE OF THESE PRODUCTS DEVELOPED USING CHILD ABUSE, SACRIFICE, AND MURDER?
“God is God. He honors the integrity and principled action that is rooted in his truth and his beauty and his worth, even where the world cannot see the point. We have no idea what explosive effects, in the depths of God’s providence and purposes, our principled action might unleash by God’s grace. “
While the issue of aborted fetal cell line use in vaccine production is now widely discussed, there are few places that document each of these cell lines and the abortions performed to develop them from primary and official sources.
As of 16 May 2020, using mostly primary sources available on the internet, NODECEPTION.ORG documented that at least 181 abortions have been performed to develop fetal cell lines for the manufacturing of vaccines, including the Covid-19 vaccines in development. Those cell lines are documented here.
Research and Development in General
Dr. Stanley Plotkin, in a deposition in January 2018, talks about how 76 aborted fetuses were used to “determine whether or not they could be used to make vaccines.”[5] Recorded disposition https://youtu.be/6D5tz-q_6o8
HEK-293** COVID VACCINE UTILIZES THIS ABORTED FETAL LINE FOR DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION AND TESTING M-RNA VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES
In 1972, the cell line Human Embryonic Kidney 293 (HEK-293) was made. [16] At least one abortion was used to get this cell line. In 2020, numerous COVID19 vaccines were developed with HEK-293, including but not limited to, Moderna’s mRNA-1273 COVID19 vaccine which uses the Spike (S) protein. [17] This Spike (S) protein is expressed in HEK-293. [18] The Jenner Institute began developing a COVID19 vaccine using ChAdOx1 technology in 2020. [19] ChAdOx1 was developed using HEK-293 cells. [20] The University of Pittsburgh also developed a COVID-19 vaccine–PittCoVacc, using HEK-293. [21] China’s CanSino Biologics’ Ad5-nCoV also uses HEK-293. [22]
Everyone needs to be personally responsible for their own health and should research the COVID-19 vaccines in development carefully before making a decision whether or not to vaccinate. Children’s Health Defense and the Informed Consent Action Network have been following the science closely and are good resources for everything COVID. They can be followed at https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ and https://www.icandecide.org/covid/.
WI-38 is the cell line created from the lung of a twelve-week-old gestation girl, aborted in 1962 in Sweden. [6] WI stands for Wistar Institute; the number represents the fetal sample. Some fetal samples were taken from the same baby, but WI-1 through WI-25 were 19 different babies. [7] WI-38 is currently used in the following FDA-licensed vaccines: Adenovirus, MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (Proquad). No longer available on the CDC’s excipient list, one can find WI-38 listed in the above vaccine package inserts, which can be found at FDA.gov. (Plotkin testifies about abortion tainted vaccines https://youtu.be/JZnlgNXqVDQ )
RA 27/3 & Rubella Vaccine
In the development of the rubella vaccine in the late 1960s, scientists needed a baby that had rubella to culture the virus. In the FDA’s MMR II vaccine insert in the second paragraph, it lists how the vaccine was prepared “the Wistar RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts.”[8] Wistar RA 27/3 stands for Rubella Abortus 27th fetus 3rd tissue explant. [9] The virus strains from this baby were then cultured on WI-38 and tested on orphans in PA. [10] From a journal article about the culturing of rubella in fetal cells, “Observations upon the growth of four strains of rubella virus in human diploid cell strains (HDCS) are reported. Sixty-three cell strains, derived from 29 fetuses by means of an organ culture technique, were studied. All HDCS were susceptible to rubella virus and a chronic infection could be established readily in them.”[11]
The rubella vaccine was then tested on pregnant women “to evaluate the fetal hazard of accidental administration of live rubella vaccine.”[12] 35 babies were aborted in this study.
MRC-5
MRC-5 is the cell line created from the lung of a fourteen-week old gestation boy, aborted in 1966 in England. [13] MRC stands for Medical Research Council Cell Strain 5. [14] At least one abortion was done to develop this line. MRC-5 is currently used in the following FDA-licensed vaccines as listed in the CDC Excipient Table[15] and individual vaccine package inserts found on FDA.gov: DTap-IPV (Quadracel), DTap-IPV/HiB (Pentacel), Hep A (Havrix), Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix), MMRV (Proquad), Rabies (Imovax), Varicella (Varivax), Shingles (Zostavax).
An aborted baby boy was also used as spare parts in the production of vaccines. His designation is MRC-5 – let’s call him Michael. Michael’s 27- year old mother as ‘given an abortion’ for psychological reasons… Did that mother suffering from mental health issues have a choice? Certainly – the baby didn’t.
Albert Sabin references two abortions when he cultivated the polio virus on embryonic tissues in 1936 “A new approach was made by the use of 3- to 4-months-old human embryos, obtained aseptically by Cesarean section. (The authors are indebted to Dr. Lance Monroe, of Bellevue Hospital, for the 2 human embryos used in this investigation.)”[1] Joan Thicke reports five abortions used in his cultivation of polio virus in embryonic tissues: “Virus multiplied successively therefore in cells derived from five different human embryos.”[2] In 1954, Dr. John Franklin Enders, Dr. Thomas Huckle Weller, and Dr. Frederick Chapman Robbins won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for their discovery that polio virus could be cultured in various tissues, including human embryonic tissue. [3] Their research indicates that there must have been a minimum of two abortions as human embryonic tissue “was obtained under sterile precautions at the time of abdominal hysterotomy for therapeutic indications. Embryos of between 12 and 18 weeks gestation have been utilized.”[4]
IMR-90
In 1975, IMR-90 was created “as a replacement for the cell line known as WI-38. The IMR-90 cell line, like WI-38, was derived from lung tissue of a human female embryo following a “therapeutic abortion”. In addition to its use for vaccine production and as a reference cell line for functional studies, it has been used in a variety of other studies, including senescence, cellular transport, and DNA repair.” [23]
PER.C6
In 1985, PER.C6 was aborted in the Netherlands. The retina was harvested from an 18-week old gestation baby, and the fetal cell line was created. [24] PER.C6 is used in the following vaccines that have not yet been licensed by the FDA: HIV, RSV, Ebola, Zika, MERS[25], COVID-19.[26]
This precious life was miscarried at 19 weeks old. His name is Grayson.
WALVAX-2
In 2015, out of nine fetuses, the Walvax-2 cell line was created from a three-month girl fetus aborted in China. “We also assessed the susceptibility of these cells to rabies, hepatitis A, and Varicella viruses. Analysis of virus titers showed the Walvax-2 cells to be equal or superior to MRC-5 cells for cultivating these viruses.”[27]
SUMMARY
To summarize, at least 181 murdered babies have been used in the research and development of vaccines: a minimum of nine in the development of the polio vaccine, 76 in general R&D, 19 in the development of WI-38, 64 in the development of RA 27/3, one in the development of MRC-5, one in the development of HEK-293, one in the development of IMR-90, one in the development of PER.C6, nine in the development of Walvax-2.
[1] Albert B Sabin, Peter K. Olitsky, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in vitro in human embryonic tissue. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1936, 34:357-359 <https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/sabinpolio1936.pdf>
[2] Joan C. Thicke, Darline Duncan, William Wood, A. E. Franklin and A. J. Rhodes; Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in Tissue Culture; Growth of the Lansing Strain in Human Embryonic Tissue, Canadian Journal of Medical Science, Vol. 30, pg 231-245 <https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/PolioThickeCanada.pdf>
[4] Thomas H. Weller, John F. Enders, Studies on the Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Viruses in Tissue Culture: I. The Propagation of Poliomyelitis Viruses in Suspended Cell Cultures of Various Human Tissue; Journal of Immunology 1952;69;645-671 <https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/poliovax1952.pdf>
[9] Plotkin et al, Attenuation of RA 2713 Rubella Virus in WI-38 Human Diploid Cell, American Journal of Diseases of Children, Vol. 118, pp 178-179, August 1969 <https://cogforlife.org/AmJDisChildRA273inWI-38.pdf>
[10] Plotkin et al, Studies of Immunization with living rubella virus; Trials in Children With a Strain Cultured From an Aborted Fetus, American Journal Diseases in Children, Vol 110, pg 381-389, 1965 <https://cogforlife.org/AmJDisChildPlotkinRubellaVirus.pdf>
[11] Hoskins, J.M., Plotkin, S.A. Behaviour of rubella virus in human diploid cell strains I. Growth of virus. Archiv f Virusforschung 21, 283–295 (1967) <https://cogforlife.org/PlotkinNumberOfAbortions.pdf>
[27] Ma B, He LF, Zhang YL, et al. Characteristics and viral propagation properties of a new human diploid cell line, Walvax-2, and its suitability as a candidate cell substrate for vaccine production. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(4):998‐1009. doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1009811 <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526020/>
There is clear evidence that vaccines are produced using the bodies of aborted human beings and experimentation of the product was performed on severely disabled humans. Some “prolifers” have agreed that since the aborted fetal cell lines were already in existence (and not created for the purpose of making a vaccine), at least some good came from the babies who died. However, they would never condone the abortion itself.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, founder and chief scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, has questioned the necessity of a vaccine against COVID-19, saying: “[w]e’re making a vaccine at warp speed for a virus that doesn’t look like it’s going to need a vaccine.”
Deisher explains that “this virus to date has less than a 0.03% fatality rate and most of those people, I believe it’s 92% or above, have other health problems.” She added that developing a vaccine in such a quick time frame “is possible, but I don’t believe it is desirable, nor do I believe that it’s safe,” with as much as “15% of the very healthy young volunteers [experiencing] significant side effects.” Many of the initial vaccine recipients have had significant adverse reactions to the vaccine. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
___________
Focus on the Family, and the Catholic Church (and other religious organizations* See below) make the argument that something ‘good’ was developed on the sacrificed bodies of human beings, and even though they were tested on severely disabled individuals, vaccines ‘morally’ acceptable.
We submit that their argument is ‘false thinking’ and as tainted as the vaccines themselves.
These researchers didn’t dig through discarded body parts to make something useful. The abortions were performed in such a way to deliver LIVE CELL SAMPLES to the laboratory for dissection and research. In addition, the principal researcher Dr. Plokin admits to unethically experimenting on children and adults with disabilities in order to develop his product that is now mandated to be injected into school children of all faiths.
Vaccines were cultured exclusively on animal tissue prior to the 1960’s (animals such as the rhesus monkey).
Culturing vaccines on animal cells was useful but had unintended consequences. A well-documented example is the discovery of vaccines contaminated with the SV40 virus from rhesus monkey cells used in its production.
In the early 1960’s, Dr. Leonard Hayflick was the first researcher who set out to create a “fetal cell line” for use in culturing vaccines instead of using animal tissue.
A fetal cell line is derived from live cells taken from an aborted baby. The live cells are modified so they can replicate indefinitely.
In 1962, Dr. Hayflick developed the first fetal cell line called WI-38 (Wistar Institute, 38th fetal sample) from the lung tissue of an aborted 31 week gestation baby girl.
The data in his 1961 and 1965 papers show at least 23 aborted babies used in the research around the creation of WI-38. The number is likely higher, given that some of the cell strains he researched were not documented in his published papers.
Fetal cell line WI-38 is currently being used in the
Next, in 1964 Dr. Stanley Plotkin isolated a rubella virus strain, RA 27/3 (Rubella Abortus, 27th fetus, 3rd tissue culture explant), that was later used in Merck’s rubella vaccine.
RA 27/3 was combined with WI-38 to create the rubella vaccine we use today.
It is well established that almost 80 aborted babies were used in the research leading to the development of RA 27/3. Dr. Plotkin’s 1969 article cites 76 of those abortions.
Dr. Plotkin’s value of life is revealed through his actions. He tested his rubella vaccine on orphans as young as 14 months old and “seronegative mentally retarded children”.
In a letter to the editor, he defended his colleagues’ unethical experimental research on those with disabilities at Willowbrook Hospital. He stated that “performing initial studies on children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential… nonfunctioning persons” is acceptable, even preferred. He went on to state, “Morality must be defined by circumstances and facts.”
12. In 1966, researchers at the Medical Research Council in the UK developed the fetal cell line MRC-5, from a 3 1/2 month gestation baby boy who was aborted for psychiatric reasons from a physically healthy 27 year old mother.
13. MRC-5 is used in numerous vaccines today, including:
CDC Vaccine Excipient Guide information is now being censored. The CDC has ‘updated’ their list without any changes to the vaccines themselves.
14. After their initial creation, each fetal cell line is reproduced many times over. Though they theoretically reproduce indefinitely, they have a finite lifespan of use, as they become more oncogenic (tumor-causing/cancerous) with each reproduction.
15. Due to the finite nature of the use of the current fetal cell lines, researchers have (since the 1960’s) continued to this day using aborted babies in their work toward creating new fetal cell lines.
16. Here’s a list of just a few fetal cell lines created in the years since WI-38, RA 27/3, and MRC-5 (with links to where some of these aborted fetal cells can actually be purchased): WI-44, MRC-7, MRC-9, HEK 293, PER.C6, IMR-90, IMR-91, TIG-1, Walvax-2.
17. The most recent fetal cell line, Walvax-2, was developed by Chinese researchers in 2015 using a 3-month gestation baby girl.
18. Walvax-2 researchers matter-of-factly describe intentionally aborting 9 babies using the “water bag method” of abortion. It’s illegal in the United States. As little value as our country places on life, this practice is so inhumane it is still banned in America. In layman’s terms, the mother’s uterus is filled with saline water so the baby can essentially be floated out of her uterus alive and in-tact. The baby is then given straight to researchers who quickly dissect them alive because a viable fetal cell line requires live cells. In the researcher’s own words, the “tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.”
19. These aborted babies were used for research in 2015, not 60 years ago. It is a current and ongoing practice.
20. Walvax-2 was specifically developed as a replacement for the aging MRC-5 cell line. It was tested with rabies, hepatitis, and Varicella viruses, and was found to be “equal or superior to MRC-5 cells for cultivating these viruses”.
Dissecting aborted babies (many presumed to be alive at the time) for vaccine research has been a consistent and ongoing practice for the past 60 years.
Researchers and scientists worked with local doctors to identify the preborn children whose sacrificed bodies would be used to “improve the health” others. The very definition of ‘child sacrifice’.
I had allowed minimal information to inform a most delicate decision for my children. I submitted without thinking critically to headlines and news articles. In the end, I allowed the thoughts of an atheist researcher with different moral, ethical and spiritual views than me to determine what I thought about such an important subject.
How does this impact the heart of our living God? As the creator and sustainer of life, I think His heart is deeply grieved over this practice.
Dr. Jay L. Wile – holds an earned Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry. He is best known as the author of award-winning elementary, junior and senior high school science courses including the Science through HisStory, “Discovering Design with…”, and “Exploring Creation with…” series. (I have these books as well and can take photos for you too)
Edward Zaccaro – Book, “The 10 Things All Future Mathematicians and Scientist Must Know (but are rarely taught)” Chapter 6: It is Important to Maintain a Healthy Skepticism subtitle The Avnit-Vaccination Movement (I have this book and the photos if you need them)
World Magazine – a magazine that is produced for youth and children to teach them a Biblical Worldview. It comes free with some curriculum
References: 1 – L. Hayflick et al., “The Limited In Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains,” Experimental Cell Research 37, (1965): 615. 2 – “Gamma Globulin Prophylaxis; Inactivated Rubella Virus; Production and Biological Control of Live Attenuated Rubella Virus Vaccines,” American Journal of Diseases of Childhood 118, no. 2 (1969): 378. 3 – J.P. Jacobs et al., “Characteristics of a Human Diploid Cell Designated MRC-5,” Nature 227 (1970): 168. 4 – Ibid.,170. 5 – Transcript of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hearing date 16 May 2001, 91. 6 – Judie Brown, “The Means of Vaccines,” National Catholic Register, April 30-May 6, 2000. 7 – J.C. Wilke, M.D., “Vaccines, Today’s Controversy,” Life Issues Connector, Life Issues Institute, July 2001. 8 – Bernard Nathanson, M.D., “Vaccines OK’d Despite Dark Past,” National Catholic Register, June 18-24, 2000.
Religious exemptions for vaccines. A topic that has been hotly debated. Should a parent with a firmly held moral objection to abortion-tainted vaccines have the right to deny vaccinations for their child in a country that values freedom of religion? Should the church support these families? Can an individual be considered PRO-LIFE and PRO VACCINE? This event was hosted by Dr. Rosie Main and Health Freedom Idaho to share the importance of preserving religious freedom from vaccine mandates.
https://youtu.be/u4ECPWbnXPI
As Christians, we were told in the scripture more than 100 times to FEAR NOT. Fear is a powerful force. We need to heed the warning.
Fear can make you do things you wouldn’t normally do– and silence you when you should be speaking.
I am guilty of staying silent – but I no longer can.
Christians are not only convinced that evil is no longer evil- but that evil is GOOD as long as the term “science” is attached to it.
As a pro-life Christian, I believe that human beings are created by God in His image. Therefore every person, from conception to natural death, possesses inherent dignity and immeasurable worth – including preborn children.As a Christian, then, I am called to defend, protect, and value all human life.
In the area of vaccines, some Christians and ministries have unknowingly taken positions in contradiction to their own core value of the sanctity of human life, and have based those positions on intentionally deceptive and incorrect information promoted by the industry itself.
Pro-life Pastors and Christians have told me, they don’t want to hear about abortion-tainted vaccines. Their excuses are:
It was only 2 aborted babies,
it was a long time ago
…vaccines have saved humanity.
We have been utterly DECEIVED by these lies.
For years I assumed that vaccines were a “dead virus” in a sterile saline solution. Is that what YOU believed? I had no reason to believe otherwise.
I didn’t have time to think about it much when my children were young. I was a busy mother of 4 sweet girls under the age of 7. I carved out time to research their strollers, cribs, cart seats, and our laundry detergent.
I wanted to protect them. So, I dutifully took my children to get their shots. I was just doing what I was told like all other parents. Listen to the doctor, who have years of training and knows better than their mother.
It wasn’t until the birth of my youngest that I found out the truth that was never disclosed by the doctor or church leader.
14 years of prayer and longing, God blessed me with my son. My Samuel was born at home, without medical intervention and almost without the midwife.
Coincidentally he was born during the epidemic outbreak of H1N1. You might remember it although it’s hard to keep up with the CDC fear-mongering epidemics.
I shared my concerns with my midwife. While I wanted to bring my son into the pediatrician to get his shots and protect him from these “preventable diseases” the flu shot was not recommended for newborns.
How could I protect him from this deadly flu epidemic?
After all, He might be exposed to it at the doctor’s office.
Her response – startled me.
She had just gotten over H1N1 flu virus which she treated it with goldenseal and other herbs. My mouth must have been hanging open. I was shocked. I thought (based on the media coverage) that she should be dead if she got the FLU.
Research the vaccines.
The suggestion that changed the course of my life – research the vaccines.
She knew I intended to cocoon my newborn – to remain at home for the first 6 weeks and bond with son and his siblings.
I had time, she said, to research. There was no hurry to inject his healthy body. And so. I did.
Although she left me a book and a DVD – it was what I found on the internet that made me realize I was remiss in protecting my children.
My first discovery was an article, posted in a scientific journal, that detailed out the fact that aborted human beings were used in the manufacture of the vaccines. The article was written by the scientist in a tone of pride and arrogance.
It described in gruesome detail the acquisition of WI-38- was the label given to the 3 ½-month-old female- who was aborted and whose DNA made it into the final product of the MMR.
Her parents were interviewed to determine if their aborted child would be a good fit for medical research.
Dr. Stanley Plotkin who developed the Rubella vaccine by using the cells of this aborted baby girl testified recently in court:
“This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children.”
These vaccine developers didn’t just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue in order to develop their products.
An aborted baby boy was also used as spare parts in the production of vaccines. His designation is MRC-5 – let’s call him Michael. Michael’s 27- year old mother as ‘given an abortion’ for psychological reasons…
Did that mother suffering from mental health issues have a choice? Certainly – The babies didn’t.
Their bodies sacrificed at the altar of science and justified by our CHURCHES and Christian Organizations under the guise of the ”good for mankind.”
The Excuses continue
My Pastor said, “yes, but it was just those two abortions…”
As if the murder of just two is a lessor evil in the sight of a righteous God?
What lies!
The biotechnology industry – developing our vaccines didn’t use just two babies who “would have been aborted anyway” years ago. Quite the contrary. Hundreds of babies were aborted in the quest to develop human fetal cell lines for the purpose of producing live virus vaccines.
During the rubella outbreak in Philadelphia in 1964 doctors convinced pregnant women that they had been exposed to rubella – the 3-day measles and that their baby would be born horribly deformed if they continued with their pregnancy.
Mothers were exploited and manipulated by FEAR, and they allowed the murder of their child.
NOT 2 NOR 5, NOT 10 or 20 but 26 mothers aborted their babies at the direction of their doctors.
Their aborted babies’ bodies were immediately sent to the science labs of Dr. Stanley Plotkin.
When researchers dissected the aborted fetuses it was then determined that these precious human beings were HEALTHY -uninfected..sacrificed in vain…Unusable for their medical research and product development.
The 27th baby was infected. RA273. Rubella-abortus-27th – 3rd tissue sample that contained the live rubella virus.
And although he had successfully isolated the virus that would eventually be used in the rubella vaccine on the market today, it didn’t stop there. In subsequent research papers, Dr. Plotkin noted another 40 aborted babies were dissected to obtain further virus samples. 2
This means there were at least 67 babies electively aborted just to obtain the virusfor the rubella vaccine. And they STILL had to culture the virus – on the bodies of even MORE aborted babies.
The bodies of 32 ‘elective abortions’ produced the final WI-38 cell line.
Are you counting? 99 aborted babies were used to produce the rubella vaccine.
**As a mother – the lives of the innocent “two” were enough to stop vaccinating. Pastor, I ask you do the 99 sacrificial lives give you pause?
Pro-life Christians still attempt to JUSTIFY VACCINES…with the excuse “It was a long time ago…”
Time. We are finite beings created by a timeless God.
Time? How can we justify the evil of child sacrifice that we have built our vaccines upon using the excuse of time?
Evil doesn’t lessen because our human memories of it do.
We have been lied to – again…
These atrocious acts of taking the life of the unborn for vaccines
– This was NOT just an act “back then”.
They are continuing to abort human babies… – they have spent years perfecting their procedures -so that the baby is still alive when they harvest organs for medical research.
I discovered all these facts – and was left with a horrible dilemma…Just weeks old, I knew I could not inject my son with the abortion-tainted vaccines. Almost instantly after realizing I would not vaccinate my son- I was overwhelmed with dread and FEAR.
Fear – my son – who I had longed for – 14 years – would die of a vaccine-preventable disease. I was terrified I would cause the death of my son. I spent hours..begging God to protect my son.
It was during those six weeks of sheltering my newborn from the world – I began to reason…
WHO AM I?
To think that a product – created by humans would outmatch the knowledge and power of the Almighty God…the Creator of the universe.
Thoughts stirred-You either “trust in the Lord with all your heart, soul, and mind,” or you don’t.
DO I truly believe that HE IS Omniscience – all-knowing?
DO I truly believe that HE is all-powerful?
If I believe that GOD IS ALL KNOWING. Then He knew that diseases – infections would arise that is why he incorporated an immune system into our fearfully and wonderfully made bodies.
GOD IS ALL-POWERFUL. He can protect my son, all my children, from the infection without the intervention of tainted vaccines.
Vaccines Did Not Save Us!
We continue to buy into their lies. Millions of lives have not been saved by vaccines. *Vaccines reduced the week-long acute illnesses but NOT the mortality rate.
Looking at mortality records, there is something that is never mentioned. The death rate for all infectious diseases had plummeted before the introduction of vaccines for all those diseases.
In the United States, the mortality rate for measles decreased by more than 98% before the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963.
In 1962, there were millions of cases of measles – a week-long infection with a fever and a rash- but the odds of dying from the infection were less than the odds of dying from drowning in a bathtub or; drowning in a swimming pool; less than slipping, tripping, or stumbling; or accidental suffocation in bed.
While the cases of measles had remained fairly steady over time, the mortality rate had already plummeted well prior to the introduction of the vaccine. That doesn’t mean there weren’t deaths because of measles in 1962. There were, but they were very rare.
They have skewed the figures intentionally FRIGHTEN parents into using their products.
The Fear of the DISEASE – I didn’t even realize I had been infected with it!
This grip of FEAR so entangled my heart and mind.., and then one day I simply REPENTED. I had put my trust in the religion of SCIENCE. I had misplaced my faith.
The deception by the industry has Christians placing their FAITH VACCINES as the Savior OF MANKIND.
Who is Our Savior?
As a Christian, a believer in God – a JUST and RIGHTEOUS GOD How can we expect He would honor our injection of a product – developed on the bodies of murdered children – to ‘protect us from infection?
It’s contrary to his nature – He can’t – He doesn’t.
Our children’s vaccines, the Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Chicken Pox are developed on aborted human beings and contain the DNA of those babies.
More than 4.5 Billion people have been injected the world wide the past 50 years with vaccines tainted with fetal DNA and Studies are just now showing that fragmented DNA that exists in the vaccines* from those aborted babies is being inserted into the nucleus of the cell of the vaccine recipient. (*source SoundChoice.org)
Humanity’s attempt to outsmart our Creator to ‘boost our immunity to disease’ is creating bodies that are weakened by mutagenesis. Damaging our very DNA.
Vaccines may have reduced the number of cases of week-long illness. The fever, rash, and swollen lymph nodes. The evidence is clear – CHRONIC life-altering diseases are on the rise.** Since the advent of vaccines -that chronic childhood diseases have increased exponentially.
1 in 285 children diagnosed with cancer before their 20th birthday.
1 in 28 boys diagnosed with neurological disorders (*source) – Autism, ADHD, learning disabilities…
-1 in 12 have Asthma,
-Over a lifetime, 1 in 26 U.S. people will be diagnosed with epilepsy a seizure disorder,
now we have severe allergies…
When I was a child – chronic diseases affected about 12% of children. Today, chronic diseases – long term – life-shortening diseases – impact 54% of our children. (source)
I no longer fear disease-illness- by PUTTING MY TRUST IN GOD as my savior and protector. And NOT a human-made vaccine.
Yet for a long time, I still dealt with fear.
Fear of being labeled, rejected for my rejection of vaccines.
For a while remaining silent was easy.
Why should anyone need to know why I no longer vaccinate?
my handpainted signs made national news
I didn’t need to discuss it -…until VACCINE MANDATES.
I don’t vaccinate because of my firmly held moral objection to abortion tainted vaccines. Because of my religious beliefs.
They took away my children’s right to attend school – even a private Christian school. (SB277)
Vaccine mandates took away my livelihood – private, in-home – Christian family daycare. Their vaccine mandate requires the injection of tainted vaccines for all my children, the children in my care and for myself. (SB 792)
Vaccine Mandates affected the churches. It took away my child’s opportunity to attend the church preschool program. I spoke with the leaders about my concerns. Yet, the Church remained silent. They then forced vaccines on all participants of their program including the adults.
No. This wasn’t Idaho.
This was California… However, it is not going to stop in California
States across America have begun to remove religious exemptions to vaccinations. Mississippi, New York, West Virginia, and Maine have successfully removed religious exemptions.
I know the Truth.
Along with this knowledge comes the responsibility to act.
I created this postcard and personally sent it to 150 churches surrounding Sacramento during the legislation of SB 277 battle in CA. NOT A SINGLE CHURCH IN THE AREA SPOKE UP. *The vaccine contains DNA not full cell from aborted babies.
To accept and use vaccines built upon the flesh of innocent humans is not an inert act, but rather one of support. 4
It’s time for pro-life Christians to take a stand. How do we stand? How do we break the stronghold they built with FEAR?
We start by speaking the truth.
VACCINES ARE ABORTION TAINTED.
YOU CAN NOT BE PRO-LIFE AND PRO-VACCINE.
Consistent with the stand so many Christians have taken to defend the sanctity of life, we should also stand for these children who have no voice. Christians and Christian ministries should lead by example, particularly because of the strong positions we already take regarding the sanctity every of human life. The world is looking for integrity.
Unbelievers and believers alike rely on our commitment to the Lord, truth, and reliable content to help them make life-impacting decisions on behalf of their families.
Will taking a stand be hard?
YES.
Christians weren’t promised an easy life.
If the Almighty God is for us, who can be against us?
Let’s Pray.
All Mighty God, you created us – formed us in your image. You placed us in THIS TIME. Help us to do your will that you might be glorified in our words and deed. We humbly come to you seeking wisdom – in the decisions we must make regarding the topic of abortion tainted vaccines and the action we must take. We ask for protection against the ‘evil one’ the liar! We know that Fear is a Liar. Fear doesn’t come from you Lord. When we are afraid – to speak up, afraid of disease and illness, afraid of the reaction of peers and family.. Help us to put our trust in you, Lord. You reminded us in John who we are – and the source of our strength. You are from God, little children, and have overcome him BECAUSE Greater is he who is in you than he who is in the world. I John 4:4
AMEN.
RESOURCES:
FAQ: How come WI38 is ‘only’ 32 abortions? In six of the abortions, multiple organs were dissected and numbered, hence the difference between the number of abortions (32) and the WI-38 designation.
Devout parents who are worried about vaccines object to ingredients containing residual material from pigs or morally reprehensible DNA strands from aborted human fetuses. The New York Times published an article stating, “Top Jewish and Islamic scholars, the Vatican endorse vaccinations.”
Religious authorities have ‘meticulously studied how vaccines are developed and what is in them,’” says the New York Times. “and still have ruled that they do not violate Jewish, Islamic or Catholic law” or Christian traditions. (source)
In reality, State governments agencies target religious leaders. They are fed half-truths via packages of media materials on the topic. They are strongly encouraged to sway their parishioners to comply with state-mandated liability-free medical products that violate the body and contradict scriptures. Avoiding persecution by the state, some religious leaders ‘vigorously endorse vaccination’ and often avoid discussions with dissenting parishioners on the topic. Dodging church conflict, they parrot the public health propaganda of ‘safe and effective’ and ‘greater good’ mantra.
What of the concerns from members who abhor abortion and reject the notion that injecting their healthy child with a disease mixed with toxins created on the body parts of aborted human beings?
Here is a recent example attempting to stem the tide of concern of millions of Christians regarding this issue author Joe Carter writes in the Gospel Coalition Article on vaccinations:
“There are currently no vaccines created by using cells directly taken from the bodies of aborted fetuses. However, there are some vaccines created from cell lines (such as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C6, and WI-26) that were derived from tissue taken from aborted fetuses from the 1960s.”
You could phrase what Joe Carter stated another way: Aborted baby cell strains are used in vaccine development for vaccines currently on the CDC schedule.
Updated to include: The fact is the two COVID 19 being distributed under FDA Emergency Authorization are also manufactured using the aborted fetal cell line HEK-293. Moderna in numerous patents in the fundamental design of mRNA technology and in the original vaccine research, development, production, and testing. (see references here)
Fetal Cells & Vaccines
The screen shot below is taken from the CDC Vaccine Excipient Summary. This table lists substances acknowledged by the vaccine manufacturer “as being contained in the final formulation of each vaccine.” As you can see below in the chicken pox vaccine example, MRC-5, “human diploid cells, including DNA & protein” is included in the list of ingredients.
The bottom line is that vaccine developers used cells of aborted babies to create the vaccines we use today. They were not passive actors, and according to the manufacturers themselves, certain elements from those aborted babies remain present in the vaccines. (See resources below regarding the aborted human DNA is present in vaccinations given today)
According to the CDC these vaccines developed from aborted baby cell strains are:
Adenovirus
DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
Hep A (Havrix)
Hep A (Vaqta)
Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix)
MMR (MMR-II)
MMRV (ProQuad)
Rabies (Imovax)
Varicella (Varivax)
Zoster (Shingles – Zostavax).
There are no U.S. approved vaccine alternatives which were not developed via abortion for Adenovirus, Chickenpox, Hepatitis A, Measles, Mumps, or Rubella.
The cell lines from two dead babies whose parents partnered with the vaccine developers are referred to (dehumanizingly) as MRC-5 (we’ll call him Jack – he was a boy) and WI-38 (we’ll call her Jill, she was a girl). Who were they? Both were about 3 and a half months when they were tragically killed in the womb. We are told Jill’s parents had her killed because they already had too many children, and Jack’s mother had him killed for “psychiatric” reasons. Neither child was deemed to be unhealthy in any way. Here is an MMR vaccine insert which lists Jill (Wi-38) under the description.
These candidates are not selected after the abortion but are meticulously screened prior to. Dr. Stanley Plotkin who developed the Rubella vaccine by using Jill’s cells testifies:
“This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well, and living in Stockholm, presumably. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children. There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.”
Plotkin further testified that in one study alone 76 aborted babieswere similarly used in the preparatory work for a single study he participated in and that he performed medical experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and babies whose mothers were in prison.
Dr Peter McCullough, an Immunologist, wrote the book, The Fetus As Transplant Donor: The Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives, on the methods used in harvesting fetal tissue in Sweden. He writes:
“They would puncture the sac of a pregnant woman at 14 to 16 weeks, put a clamp on the head of the baby, pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the baby’s head and attach a suction machine to remove the brain cells… At 16 to 21 weeks, they would do prostaglandin abortions where a chemical is injected into the womb causing the woman to go into mini-labor and pass the baby. Fifty percent of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys, etc.”
Christian Leaders Claim Abortion Tainted Vaccines Morally Acceptable based on Faulty Assumptions
“The key consideration in whether using currently available vaccines is licit or immoral is whether there is material cooperation with the evil act of abortion. If the abortion was conducted in order to harvest tissues that were to be used for the vaccine, then it would clearly be immoral. But in the case of the vaccines listed above, the abortion was carried out for other reasons and the tissue was acquired post-mortem for the purpose medical research.”
Dr. McCullough and Dr. Plotkin’s testimony make it clear : It’s not like these researchers would just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue.
Catholic Religious Leaders “wash their hands of guilt” and encourage vaccination for ‘common good’
The National Catholic Bioethics Center : “Upon use, one should register a complaint with the manufacturer of the products as an acceptable form of conscientious objection,” the statement says. “This signals opposition to the wider, morally reprehensible practice of using the unborn as little more than research material for science.”
“There is no moral obligation to register such a complaint in order to use these vaccines,” it says, adding that “it should be obvious that vaccine use in these cases does not contribute directly to the practice of abortion since the reasons for having an abortion are not related to vaccine preparation.”
The above statement the Catholic leaders completely ignore the proof that abortions were performed in a manner to specifically use the innocent unborn as spare parts for the intent purpose of the research and manufacturing vaccination.
According to the National Network for Immunization Information (NNii) the reason they used aborted babies is because “human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”
Others, in agreement with McCullough, dispute the need for such practices to develop vaccines.
Either way, if you adopt the CDC vaccination schedule, you can’t avoid abortion tainted vaccinations.
Above is an excerpt of a 5 part series on Christians and Vaccinations that can be found at NewCityTimes.com
Vaccine Exemptions Protect Religious Freedom
RESOURCES: No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:
A portion of the resources from COGforlife.org website (posted her as a redundancy visit their site for the full article)
Quoting:
Importantly, the new data supports NIAID’s approach to a gene-based vaccine for COVID-19 and will also be useful in other vaccine approaches including protein-based vaccines and other nucleic acid or vector-based delivery approaches. NIAID scientists designed the stabilized spike antigen based on previous knowledge obtained from studying other coronavirus spike structures. NIAID and the biotechnology company Moderna, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, are developing a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, which directs the body’s cells to express the spike in its prefusion conformation to elicit an immune response.
And if that is not enough, Moderna’s use of HEK is not new…previous patents in 2015 show its use as well. Use the Find function and type in HEK in the search…it’s listed 76 times.
Since it deals with lung infection (which Covid-19 causes) it seems like a pretty good reference to what they are doing. The use of 293 cells is cited in several places including in the supplementary information. That is linked here:
Which clearly states they are using the Spike protein which some have tried to deny.
Under Vaccine – Quoting:
The mRNA-1273 vaccine candidate, manufactured by Moderna, encodes the S-2P antigen, consisting of the SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein with a transmembrane anchor and an intact S1–S2 cleavage site. S-2P is stabilized in its prefusion conformation by two consecutive proline substitutions at amino acid positions 986 and 987, at the top of the central helix in the S2 subunit.8
And voila – Reference no. 8 at the bottom of the page is none other than:
Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020;367:1260-1263.
