Tag: antibody

  • Vaccine Rolls Out to Healthcare Workers as Safety Concerns Remain Unresolved

     The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare anticipates receiving and distributing the Pfizer COVID-19 by mid-December, first to healthcare providers then to people living and working in long-term care facilities.

    About 13,650. Idahoans will be injected with this fast-tracked vaccine this month. The healthcare workers who will receive the 2 dose injections will be those who have the highest exposure risk in the hospital. This means those individuals who are currently working with patients who have tested positive for COVID experiencing reoccurring exposure to the virus.

    Pfizer and BioNTech’s new vaccine is a new-style of immunization called an mRNA vaccine. MRNA jabs work by training the immune system to fight off the virus by using a small piece of genetic code from Covid-19. Once injected, human cells are triggered to make parts of the virus which are known as “spike proteins”. The immune system recognizes these proteins as foreign and so produces antibodies to attack the virus and guard the immune system against infection. As a completely new technology, there is no way of knowing what this manipulation of our DNA will do to our bodies our immune system, or its impact on our unborn future generations.

    Has the antibody-dependent enhancement been resolved?

    Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is vaccine-enhanced disease that causes the vaccinated person to develop a clinically severe form of Covid-19 after exposure SARS-CoV-2.

    Scientists have been trying to make coronavirus vaccines for decades and have not been successful. Previous SARS-CoV vaccines that they initially thought were successful because of the robust antibody production, turned out to make the disease worse when subjects were challenged by infection.

    Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is an intriguing mechanism by which certain antibodies actually enhance viral replication by promoting the entry of the pathogen into immune cells (eg, macrophages) resulting in worsening of the infection.

    Dr. Peter Hotez (scientist, vaccinology) and Dr. Paul Offit (co-creator of the rotavirus vaccine) both stated earlier this year, regarding the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. They expressed concern that no coronavirus vaccine has ever been successful because of this very issue. (Both of these doctors are very pro-vaccine and can often be found invalidating the real risks of vaccines and the reality of widespread vaccine injury.)

    In this video footage, Offit, Hotez, and even Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions, “vaccine enhancement,” when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune responses.

    VIEW THE VIDEO HERE: https://tinyurl.com/y9st8pot

    While current vaccines being developed have been touted in the news as successful (giving the CEOs a chance to sell high while they can – Moderna / Pfizer), their “success” is based on antibody production… not on challenging the test subjects/participants with the virus to see if there is successful protection from or enhancement of disease.

    They don’t require those kinds of real-world tests (maybe it’s just “too risky”, as a former Chief Medical Officer from Merck states in this article), regardless of the potential for antibody-dependent enhancement (though it looks like the U.K. might attempt this soon):

    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/11/17/21540773/covid-19-vaccine-human-challenge-trial-ethics

    Our medical heroes who are on the front lines will return to work and continue to be exposed to those who are infected. The trials have not tested what happens to those who are exposed to the virus after injection.

    It’s concerning to think of the risk posed to the individuals and our community further putting when our front line healthcare workers in harm’s way IF the vaccine causes a more severe case of the virus.

    November 2020: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220307311

    “…the detailed mechanism of ADE [antibody-dependent enhancement] and how to resolve this in coronavirus infections is not yet totally clear. From previous research on ADE in other coronaviruses, in particular SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, it appears that the existence of ADE will elicit more severe body injury… This may affect the results of vaccine therapy.

    The presence of this phenomenon in these two coronaviruses indicates a potential risk in the vaccine therapy for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as it shares the same viral receptor and similar genome sequence with SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 may have a similar mechanism of viral entry and thus may share similar mechanisms of ADE.

    This novel coronavirus has not long been known, so studies in this field have not yet led to any conclusions.”

    Unfortunately, it appears that it is our healthcare workers who will be ‘safety testing’ this vaccine.

    Additional Reading on the Fast Tracked Vaccine and Lack of Safety Studies:

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2033538

  • Failed Flu Mist Vaccine Returns for 2018

    Breaking News expect outbreaks of the flu this season. The CDC has brought back the (LIVE VIRUS) FluMist nasal spray. It was initially pulled due to poor “efficacy” boasting a 3% protection rating, which can more than likely be blamed on viral shedding from said vaccine. Most package inserts of live viral vaccines (MMR, chickenpox, shingles, flumist, rabies) state shedding can last for 2-5 weeks post vaccination. And if remembered correctly, last year it was noted by a study performed by PNAS, paid for by the CDC, that even those vaccinated with IM/injectable flu vaccinations had an increased shedding rate 6.3x more than those who do not receive a flu vaccination. Also, per Science Daily, it should also be noted that children who receive the flu vaccine have 3x the risk of hospitalization for Flu. 

    Why on earth would you want to spray live virus into your nostrils. Think about it! They stopped giving it because it wasn’t working! Now suddenly it’s going to work? I guess it will work at spreading the Flu…

    Late last year Health Impact News reported on a study published by The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, documenting how influenza viruses cultured in eggs mutate, making the flu vaccines virtually worthless.

    The authors of the study stated:

    Seasonal influenza vaccine does not always confer protection in vaccinated individuals. Vaccine candidates are selected from clinical isolates based on their antigenic properties.

    It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines. However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.

    See:

    Study: Annual Flu Shot Ineffective

    Is the U.S. Mass Flu Vaccination Program Actually Causing More Severe Influenza Outbreaks?

    Over the past few years, several studies have pointed to the fact that repeated flu vaccinations year after year actually reduces the effectiveness of the vaccine, raising serious questions about yearly mass flu vaccination programs.

    The most recent was a study out of Australia where researchers showed that those who had multiple flu vaccines actually produced fewer antibodies than those who did not get the flu shot regularly.

    Most people probably do not realize that the measure of success for a vaccine is not whether you stay healthy or get sick, but simply if your body develops the appropriate antibodies thought to be required to fight off the disease being vaccinated against.

    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explains this very well in the following video:

    This was not the first study to show that repeated flu shots every year decrease one’s resistance to influenza viruses.

    Dr. Edward Belongia of the Wisconsin’s Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation reported the same thing back in 2015, and a study in 2013 showed that getting the flu shot two years in a row lowered protection.

    We have frequently published an interview with Dr. Mark Geier explaining how little science there is behind the flu vaccine.

    Dr. Geier is NOT anti-vaccine. He is an M.D. and has a Ph.D. in genetics. He spent 10 years working at the National Institute of Health, and was a professor at Johns Hopkins University as a geneticist. He is also the author of over 150 peer-reviewed publications.

    He worked on vaccine safety and efficacy for more than 30 years. He was one of four scientists that worked to replace the DTP vaccine, a vaccine that caused every child to become sick with a high fever at the time of vaccination, with the DTaP vaccine, which is a more purified vaccine.

    Dr. Geier explains that the CDC does not follow the law for vaccines in requiring long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine like they do with other vaccines, as it is impossible to test a vaccine that changes every year.

    So the flu vaccine is basically an experimental vaccine that they want to give out to 300 million people every year. There are also no studies showing the safety of giving the flu vaccine to the same person every single year.

    However, Dr. Geier points out that the CDC is in the business of distributing ‘flu vaccines, because they represent 300 million doses per year, whereas all the childhood vaccines together only number 20 million.

    Dr. Geier explains that flu is “the wrong thing to vaccinate against” because you have to keep re-vaccinating against it every year, unlike childhood infectious diseases, such as smallpox, that are only vaccinated for once.

    Learn How to Boost Your Natural Immunity

    Immune Boosting Herbs

    Fire Cider Tonic

    Ginger Teas

    Vitamin C

    Sources:

    https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0622-laiv-flu.html

    Something to think about and consider when (not if) flu epidemics begin to rise in our country this year. Who is really responsible for the “outbreaks?” 

    Shedding: Vaccine Insert 12.2 Pharmacodynamics Shedding Studies
    Shedding of vaccine viruses within 28 days of vaccination with FluMist was evaluated in (1) multi-center 
    study MI-CP129 which enrolled healthy individuals 6 through 59 months of age (N = 200); and (2) multi-
    center study FM026 which enrolled healthy individuals 5 through 49 years of age (N = 344). In each study, 
    nasal secretions were obtained daily for the first 7 days and every other day through either Day 25 and on 
    Day 28 or through Day 28. In study MI-CP129, individuals with a positive shedding sample at Day 25 or 
    Day 28 were to have additional shedding samples collected every 7 days until culture negative on 
    2 consecutive samples. Results of these studies are presented in Table 5.

    Return of FluMist: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2018/02/cdc-vaccine-panel-brings-back-flumist-2018-19-season

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/01/17/1716561115

    https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090519172045.htm