Tag: cancer

  • Why is Childhood Cancer INCREASING?

    “In 2014, it is estimated that 15,780 children and adolescents ages 0 to 19 years will be diagnosed with cancer and 1,960 will die of the disease in the United States”[1] In other words, 1 out of 8 will not survive.

    Aluminum in antiperspirants is associated with cancer in part because breast tumors are found more often in the upper-outer quadrant of the breast—closest to where the antiperspirant is applied.[2]

    Adding aluminum to normal murine mammary gland epithelial cells promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis. [3]

    A child born in the US now receives up to 4925µg of aluminum via vaccines by age 18. Contrary to popular belief, it is not completely excreted; in fact, nanoparticulate aluminum instead of ionic aluminum is used precisely to extend the effect of the immune response of the vaccines and it does this only if it isn’t quickly excreted.

    This isn’t rocket science folks.

    ———————

    [1] https://www.cancer.gov/…/child-adolescent-cancers-fact-sheet

    [2] Aluminium, antiperspirants and breast cancer
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0162013405001613

    [3]
    Aluminium chloride promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in normal murine mammary gland epithelial cells, 2016
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.30393/full

    From [2]:
    “Clinical studies showing a disproportionately high incidence of breast cancer in the upper outer quadrant of the breast together with reports of genomic instability in outer quadrants of the breast provide supporting evidence for a role for locally applied cosmetic chemicals in the development of breast cancer. Aluminium is known to have a genotoxic profile, capable of causing both DNA alterations and epigenetic effects, and this would be consistent with a potential role in breast cancer if such effects occurred in breast cells.”

    research gathered by Andre Angelantoni 

    Additional Resources: 

     12th Keele Meeting on Aluminum in Vancouver in March.

    https://www.keele.ac.uk/aluminium/keelemeetings/2017/

    “Application of aluminium-based antiperspirant salts has been embraced globally as a way of reducing sweating in the underarm region but without any prior knowledge of the long-term consequences. Coincidentally, the upper outer quadrant of the breast has become the site of highest incidence of both benign and malignant breast diseases. Measurements in human breast tissue, breast cyst fluid and nipple aspirate fluid have demonstrated the presence of aluminium in the human breast. Studies in cell culture demonstrate that aluminium can enable development of several of the hallmarks of cancer, including anchorage-independent growth, genomic instability, cell migration and invasion. More recently published studies demonstrate that exposure of non transformed breast epithelial cells to aluminium in cell culture leads to enhanced tumour growth and metastasis when the cells are injected into mice. This lecture will provide an overview of research findings, and will identify data gaps and regulatory needs.”

    12th Keele Meeting on Aluminum Abstract Book

  • Her body was riddled with cancer. She fired her oncologist. A year later…

    Annie Brandt had been treating her cancer naturally for close to a year. Her oncologist disagreed with what she was doing. Find out what his mandate was and what she told him after that. Find out what she also learned about her cancer after she’d been doing natural treatments. After a year of natural cancer treatments, this was her result!

  • Vaccine Cancer Connection

    HFI: Today children receive as many as 69 doses of 16 different vaccines, all given by the age of eighteen. Not one of those vaccines was evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.  Coinciding with the ever-increasing vaccine schedule are soaring rates of chronic illness in children, including cancer, which has skyrocketed and is now the leading cause of death by disease in children past infancy. Begs the question, WHY hasn’t there been a study/evaluation. 

    “This vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or
    mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.    ”

    This phrase or one similar can be found on just about every vaccine package insert and should be justification for any reasonable person to decline vaccination.  However, doctors are not required to give full informed consent regarding vaccines and most people blindly trust their doctors.

    Considering the recommended vaccine schedule has tripled in the United States over the last thirty years, parents have begun to question whether this is necessary or valuable to their children.

    In 1983, children received up to 23 doses of eight vaccines before the age of eighteen.  Today children receive as many as 69 doses of 16 different vaccines, all given by the age of eighteen.

    Coinciding with the ever-increasing vaccine schedule are soaring rates of chronic illness in children, including cancer, which has skyrocketed and is now the leading cause of death by disease in children past infancy.

    Government authorities refuse to acknowledge any link between cancer and vaccination, but could injecting toxic chemicals repeatedly into our children, especially at critical intervals in their development be causing cancer in so many?

    Toxic Vaccine Ingredients You Need to Know About

    Formaldehyde – There is sufficient evidence from cancer studies in humans proving the carcinogenetic effects of this ingredient.  Both the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer admit formaldehyde is a known carcinogen.

    Millions of children receive injections annually containing this toxic ingredient.

    Is it a coincidence that formaldehyde has been associated with leukemia and that the number one cancer in children is leukemia?

    Mercury Is In Vaccines Too – Mercury is a known carcinogen and for many years children received up to 237 micrograms (mcg) from vaccines during the first two years of life.  This far exceeds the EPA’s recommended safe (to ingest, not inject), level of 1/10th of 1 microgram per kilogram a day.

    A rabbit will die if given 35 mcg of mercury.

    Thimerosal, which is in many vaccines, is a mercury-containing compound that is 50 times more toxic than plain mercury!  The CDC claims to have removed “most” thimerosal from common pediatric vaccines, leaving only “trace amounts.”

    There are NO safe amounts of mercury established for humans and yet, children receive combined vaccines that can build up mercury in the body and cause potential problems.

    Aluminum, Yep, It’s In There Too – The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aluminum for use as an adjuvant in human vaccines to boost immune response.  Aluminum is harmful to all life forms.

    The FDA limits the dosage to 0.85 milligrams per vaccine to minimize exposure; but children receive other vaccines at the same time that also contain aluminum.

    The American Academy of Pediatrics admits that aluminum interferes with many cellular and metabolic processes in the body’s nervous system and tissues.

    Repeated exposure to aluminum can have damaging effects and yet children receive repeated injections during the recommended vaccine schedule.  Studies with mice have demonstrated a transient rise in aluminum levels in brain tissue.  Aluminum is also widely associated with breast cancer.

    What is Polysorbate 80? – Polysorbate 80 is a toxic substance that should never be ingested or placed on the skin, much less injected, and yet it is in vaccines. Studies with lab rats show Polysorbate 80 has both carcinogenic and infertility effects.

    Yet, it’s ironic that this carcinogenic ingredient is found both in Merck’s cancer vaccine, Gardasil, and is also used in chemotherapy given to cancer patients.

    Recombinant DNA – A Biohazard? – Speaking of Gardasil, genetically modified HPV DNA, which had firmly attached itself to aluminum, was found in blood samples of a 13 year old girl who became chronically ill following her third dose of the vaccine. Could Recombinant HPV DNA cause human cell mutations and cancer?

    While searching for the reason why adolescent girls were suffering such severe side effects after receiving the Gardasil vaccine, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, of Sane Vax, Inc., found that the vaccine was contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus. This rDNA from both strains of HPV in the vaccine were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant. This now reaches the level of a “dangerous biohazard.” This rDNA is not natural and is genetically modified.  Now the girls who received the contaminated vaccine, have human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA in their bodies. When recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, it could stay forever and cause mutations; the results could be catastrophic.

    SV40 (Simian Virus) Responsible for Cancer Cases – In the 1950s, Rhesus Monkey kidney cells containing SV40 were used to grow the polio virus. Dr. Maurice Hilleman, MD, a renowned scientist who developed Merck’s vaccine program and dozens of vaccines, made astounding revelations to the public that Merck had been injecting this dangerous virus into people worldwide.

    Even after the US government knew about contamination, they allegedly continued to inject children with the contaminated vaccine until the 1990s.

    SV40 is known to cause different types  of cancers in laboratory animals including mesotheliomas, lymphomas and brain cancers.

    A study in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that mothers who received the Salk polio vaccine had brain tumors at a rate “13 times greater” than mothers who received no vaccine!

    Cancer-Connection-Vaccine-Toxicity

    How You Can Build Immunity And Possibly Reverse Vaccine Damage 

    Anyone who has been injected with vaccines, (which is most people) may have vaccine damage.

    According to the vaccine package inserts, a list of side effects include seizures, asthma, diabetes, eczema, allergies, auto-immune disease, autism, and more.  There are many studies linking vaccines to arthritis, chronic cognitive dysfunction, behavioral changes, learning disabilities, motor function impairment, autism, and cancer to name a few.

    Many people claim to have reversed vaccine damage by using natural therapies like chelation, bentonite clay, homeopathy and fasting.

    It is much better to support the body through nutrition and natural supplements than to inject harmful pathogens and toxins into it.

    Eating a diet rich in organic fresh fruits and vegetables along with adequate rest, clean water, sunshine, exercise and minerals will go a long way in keeping the immune system strong and the body running well.

    At the end of the day, a strong, healthy, pure, untouched immune system will fight most illnesses, including cancer.

    Toxic chemicals have no place inside the human body and the sooner the medical establishment recognizes this, the faster we will see a health progression instead of a continual regression.  We must stop adding fuel to the fire with more and more vaccines.

    Unfortunately, allopathic medicine and many governing authorities have endorsed what seems to be an ever increasing, toxic vaccine schedule which has been a calamity to the immune system and has undermined the health of at least two generations, all for the sake of profit.

    Do you think there is a vaccine cancer connection? Please share your thoughts below.

    This article originally appeared at: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/vaccine-cancer-connection/.

  • Coca-Cola: Nigerian Court Deems It Unfit For Human Consumption

    A Nigerian court has ruled that two Coca-Cola products, Fanta and Sprite, are not safe for human consumption. Presiding Nigerian judge Justice Adedayo Oyebanji ruled that high levels of benzoic acid and sunset additives in Fanta and Sprite pose a serious health risk to consumers when mixed with ascorbic acid, commonly known as vitamin C. UK regulators have stated that benzoic acid can form the carcinogen benzene when combined with ascorbic acid. This means that the drinks could cause cancer. 

    The court also ordered the Nigerian Bottling Company (NBC) – a member of Coca-Cola Hellenic group which bottles Coca-Cola products in Nigeria – to place written warnings on the bottles of the two drinks, saying the drinks pose a health risk. This means the two drinks would carry warning labels like cigarettes.

    Further, the court imposed financial costs of two million naira ($6,350) against the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) for failing to ensure health standards in the country.

    “It is manifest that NAFDAC has been grossly irresponsible in its regulatory duties to the consumers of Fanta and Sprite manufactured by Nigeria Bottling Company. NAFDAC has failed the citizens of this great nation by its certification as satisfactory for human consumption products … which become poisonous in the presence of ascorbic acid,” Justice Oyebanji said in his ruling.

    In fact, the Nigerian public wouldn’t have had this relief ruling aimed at protecting their lives had something not gone wrong between a businessman and the NBC. Read more about that case at CNN. 

    Following the ruling, Nigerian citizens took to social media to express their dissatisfaction of all Coca-Cola products. Many lashed out at NAFDAC for handling consumer safety in the country poorly. They accused the agency of placing more priority on generating revenues than protecting citizens.

    Some also accused NAFDAC for being responsible for numerous health problems and deaths because it allows corporations to sell poison to the public. The majority of citizens called for a boycott against all Coca-Cola products in the country to serve as a deterrent to other unscrupulous corporations taking advantage of endemic corruption to kill the public. The ruling has dented the image of Coca-Cola in the country. The company is likely to suffer losses this year because the scandal will remain in the minds of citizens for a long time to come. – From Truth Theory.

  • Gardasil takes another life

    While the link between HPV and cancer remains obscured, there is no shortage of evidence that the Gardasil vaccine does more harm than good. The vaccine has been linked to causing cervical cysts, crippling autoimmune diseases and even destroying women’s ovaries. Merck has even admitted that they “forgot” to see how a vaccine that was initially targeted at young women might effect a key component of their reproductive systems – their ovaries. Some have even died almost immediately following vaccination.

    Despite the claims of safety being pushed out by the media, the medical industry and Big Pharma, the evidence that the Gardasil vaccine is a damaging injection continues to pile up. Even industry professionals have come forward to express their concerns. Dr. Dianne Harper, a leading HPV researcher that was involved in the approval of Gardasil, has cautioned, “Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year.”

  • Gardasil The Decision We will always regret

    Gardasil has been the subject of controversy for many years now. In fact, it has even been regarded as one of the most dangerous vaccines on the market today. Perhaps what is most alarming about this treacherous vaccine, however, is the fact that its manufacturer, Merck & Co, now wants to begin marketing their product to infants – and trials on babies have already begun. Merck recently launched a Gardasil vaccine trial on children at least one year old, and it’s set to conclude in early 2017.

    You read that right. A pharmaceutical giant is testing a vaccine for an STD on babies. It doesn’t really get more corrupt and outrageous than that, now does it?

    Gardasil was developed for the STD known as HPV, and was approved by the FDA in 2006. The disease did not become of concern until the 1980s, when research first suggested that there may be a link between HPV and cervical cancer. However, whether this link actually exists has been a major point of contention. There are several hypotheses that explain why HPV may not actually cause cancer, but one particularly interesting theory was expressed by McCormack et al in their paper published by the journal Molecular Cytogenetics in 2015. The research team also raised several significant questions about the prevailing theory on the connection between HPV and cervical cancer. For example, HPV is present in 70 to 80 percent of the American adult population, so why does cervical cancer only effect one out of ever 10,000 women?

    While the link between HPV and cancer remains obscured, there is no shortage of evidence that the Gardasil vaccine does more harm than good. The vaccine has been linked to causing cervical cysts, crippling autoimmune diseases and even destroying women’s ovaries. Merck has even admitted that they “forgot” to see how a vaccine that was initially targeted at young women might effect a key component of their reproductive systems – their ovaries. Some have even died almost immediately following vaccination.

    Despite the claims of safety being pushed out by the media, the medical industry and Big Pharma, the evidence that the Gardasil vaccine is a damaging injection continues to pile up. Even industry professionals have come forward to express their concerns. Dr. Dianne Harper, a leading HPV researcher that was involved in the approval of Gardasil, has cautioned, “Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year.”

  • Evidence that Agricultural Pesticides and Other Toxic Chemicals Are Poisoning Us

    Two new reports published in recent weeks add to the already large and convincing body of evidence, accumulated over more than half a century, that agricultural pesticides and other toxic chemicals are poisoning us.

    Both reports issue scathing indictments of U.S. and global regulatory systems that collude with chemical companies to hide the truth from the public, while they fill their coffers with ill-gotten profits.

    According to the World Health Organization, whose report focused on a range of environmental risks, the cost of a polluted environment adds up to the deaths of 1.7 million children every year.

    A report by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council, focused more narrowly on agricultural chemicals. The UN report states unequivocally that the storyline perpetuated by companies like Monsanto—the one that says we need pesticides to feed the world—is a myth. And a catastrophic one at that.

    The fact that both these reports made headlines, in mainstream outlets like the Washington Post and the Guardian, is on one hand, good news. On the other, it’s a sad and discouraging commentary on our inability to control corporate greed.

    Ever since Rachel Carson, in her book Silent Spring,so eloquently outlined the insanity of poisoning our environment, rational thinkers have warned that at the least, we ought to follow the precautionary principle when it comes to allowing the widespread use of poisons to be unleashed into the environment.

    And yet, here we are, in 2017, facing the prospect under the most corporate-friendly administration in history, of dismantling what little remains of the government’s ability to stop the rampant poisoning of our soils, food, water and air—the very resources upon which all life depends.

    In his book, Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA, published in 2014, E. G. Vallianatos, who worked for the EPA for 25 years, wrote:

    “It is simply not possible to understand why the EPA behaves the way it does without appreciating the enormous power of American’s industrial farmers and their allies in the chemical pesticide industries, which currently do about $40 billion per in year business. For decades, industry lobbyists have preached the gospel of unregulated capitalism and Americans have bought it. Today, it seems the entire government is at the service of the private interests of America’s corporate class.”

    That was three years ago. And yet, as public opinion shifts toward condemnation of the widespread use of toxic chemicals on our food, here in the U.S., government officials entrusted with public health and safety appear more determined than ever to uphold the “rights” of corporations to poison everything in sight—including our children.

    Exposure to Pollution Kills Millions of Children, WHO Reports Find

    According to the WHO reports, which focused on a wide range of chemicals, including those found in food, electronics, contaminated water supplies, second-hand tobacco smoke and others, one-fourth of all children’s deaths and diseases in 2012 could have been prevented by reducing environmental risks. From the WHO press release:

    Children are also exposed to harmful chemicals through food, water, air and products around them. Chemicals, such as fluoride, lead and mercury pesticides, persistent organic pollutants and others in manufactured goods, eventually find their way into the food chain. And, while leaded petrol has been phased out almost entirely in all countries, lead is still widespread in paints, affecting brain development.

    What Will it Take?

    If you find yourself unsurprised by the findings of these reports or the recommendations that follow, it’s no wonder. Many organizations, including ours, have for decades been calling for reforms.

    Join us and 1000’s of other families across the United States calling for a change. RSVP to the Children’s March For Humanity https://www.eventbrite.com/e/childrens-march-for-humanity-boise-tickets-33803789043

    Portions of this article were written by Katherine Paul is associate director of the Organic Consumers Association.

  • Erin got the Gardasil Shot, then she got Cervical Cancer

    When healthy Erin Crawford was in college she was asked to take the Gardasil vaccine as part of a trial. Having lost several family members to cancer, it was a no-brainer for her.

    To her shock, within 24 hours she was violently sick and vomiting. She would later develop cervical cancer within 18 months, the very thing the vaccine was supposed to protect her from.

    Here this well…

  • Fast Tracked EBOLA VACCINE Contaminated with Cancer Causing Monkey Cells

    Fast Tracked EBOLA VACCINE Contaminated with Cancer Causing Monkey Cells

    The new experimental Ebola vaccine being fast-tracked for mass production was developed using a continuous cell line (Vero) culture derived from the stockpile remains of an African Green Monkey.(1963).

    ‘The Vero 1008 C (E6) cell line was originally obtained from ATCC (Maryland, USA) and cultured in Gibco® Dulbelcco’s modified Eaggle’s medium (DMEM) with GlutaMAX™, high glucose and HEPES supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Euro-Clone), 1% Gibco® penicillin/streptomycin solution (5,000 U/mL) and 1x Gibco® MEM non-essential amino acids solution (100x) at 37°C, 5%CO2.’

    Based on my extensive research into the original Polio vaccine, all related Vero cell lines are cross-contaminated with Simian Virus 40. This new vaccine will unleash a torrent of spin-off rarified cancer strains into the African population.

    ‘Vero cells are sensitive to infection with SV-40, SV-5, measles, arboviruses, reoviruses, rubella, simian adenoviruses, polioviruses, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial viruses, vaccinia, and others.’

    read more about SV-40, Ebola, Yellow Fever and Polio

  • $671 Million Payoff for Poisoning the Water with PFOA

    $671 Million Payoff for Poisoning the Water with PFOA

    Residents whose water was poisoned by a cancer-causing chemical use to make Teflon received a settlement. Yet, the toxicity remains in the water and the health of those exposed. PFOA contaminates the tap water of 7 million American and pollutes the blood of virtually everyone. Non-stick compounds will continue to threaten our health for a long, long time. 

    SAN FRANCISCO – DuPont and its spinoff company Chemours agreed today to pay $671 million to settle about 3,500 lawsuits from West Virginia and Ohio residents whose drinking water was poisoned by a cancer-causing chemical used to make Teflon.
    Although the settlement closes the most infamous case involving the chemical PFOA, its toxic legacy lingers worldwide, said EWG President Ken Cook.

    PFOA is the best known of the class of chemicals called PFCs, which were used for decades in hundreds of consumer products – including DuPont’s Teflon and 3M’s Scotchgard – even as chemical companies covered up internal studies of its hazards. PFOA and its cousin, PFOS, never break down in the environment. They build up in people’s bodies, and can be passed from mother to child in the womb and though breast milk.

    PFCs’ dangers came to light in a 2001 class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of more than 50,000 residents of the region surrounding Parkersburg, W. Va., the home of DuPont’s Teflon plant. In 2005, acting on a petition from EWG, the Environmental Protection Agency fined DuPont a record $16.5 million, and the company and other manufacturers agreed to phase out PFOA and PFOS.

    A scientific panel funded by DuPont found probable links between PFOA and illnesses including testicular and kidney cancers and thyroid disease, and subsequent studies showed other health effects at even the smallest doses. Although PFOA and PFOS are no longer manufactured in the U.S., chemical companies have replaced them with very similar chemicals that have not been proven safer.

    “The story of PFOA is a tragic tale of how the worldwide spread of toxic chemicals in our everyday products – even when their manufacturers know they are harmful – has turned everyone on Earth into unwilling participants in a dangerous chemistry experiment,” Cook said. “Are we going to learn in the decades to come that the chemicals replacing PFOA are also threatening our health? The chemical industry’s history says yes.”