Tag: CDC

  • STOP THE COVID SHOTS FOR SCHOOL

    Despite a huge public outcry, consisting of more than 31,000 public comments posted on the CDC’s website, despite hundreds of experts warning of serious risks to children, the Centers for Disease Control has voted to add the Covid mRNA vaccine to the VFC Program, which provides free Vaccines for children and as well as add the COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as six months old to the new Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedules, which will be rolled out in February 2023. This will add 54 injections (72 antigens because of combined shots like MMR) to 72 injections (90 antigens.) Its nothing to do with health. This will allow the pharmaceutical companies to escape product liability which means the “emergency” can end, but the liability protection for the pharmaceutical companies continues.

    More than a dozen states automatically add new CDC recommendations to their required schedule of vaccines for schools and daycares. There is information about vaccine laws and exemptions in every state here. 

    TELL HEALTH DEPARTMENT NO! WE DON’T WANT THE COVID VAX FOR SCHOOL

    Idaho will require the Health Department to submit a rule change to the legislature. Prior to that submission, they are required to host public hearings. IT IS TIME TO SPEAK UP NOW AND SAY “NO!”

    Negotiated Rulemaking Meetings and Public Hearings Schedule

    We must stop them before they try!

    “Every state must reject this CDC mandate for children immediately. Even the CDC’s own data reveals that these COVID shots are harming children. Pharmaceutical companies merely see children as a budget item to increase their bottom line and they continue to ignore the serious adverse events and deaths caused by these experimental shots.” 

    Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver

    Call to Action

    We know you are outraged and want to take action immediately. Now is the time for the parents and grandparents to reach out to the Health Department, the Education Department, and school administration, as well as the legislators who are running for office, and let them know that there is no medical or scientific justification to add a vaccine to the childhood schedule especially when there is no clinical data to justify shot.

    Parents hold power — don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

    CONTACT:

    Governor Little: https://gov.idaho.gov/contact-us/

    Department of Education

    Make clear to your superintendent and commissioner that exemptions are not enough and that you will be pulling your child from school if this vaccine is mandated for attendance, costing the district tens of thousands of dollars in funding.

    Sherri Ybarra: Superintendent of Public Instruction
    Telephone  208-334-2270  Fax  208-334-2632

    Email  board@osbe.idaho.gov

    P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0037

    650 West State Street, 3rd Floor  Boise, ID 83702

    Department of Health and Welfare

    Director: Dave Jeppesen, 208-334-5500 https://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/director-contact

    Deputy Directors: Miren Unsworth and Lisa Hettinger, 208-334-5500

    YOUR LEGISLATORS & LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATES *find your district:

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/action/demand-public-health-agencies-and-lawmakers-stop-covid-vaccine-mandates/

    COVID Adds 18 More Shots For Our Children

    Today’s vote on adding the COVID-19 vaccines means 18 more shots — one per year between the ages of 6 months and 18 years — will be added to the schedule, according to Toby Rogers, Ph.D.

    “So overnight the childhood schedule would go from 54 injections (72 antigens because of combined shots like MMR) to 72 injections (90 antigens),” Rogers said. “This has absolutely nothing to do with health — it’s all about profit and power.”

    The number of shots added to the schedule may, in fact, be higher than Roger’s estimate because the accepted revisions did not appear to specify the number of booster doses recommended and linked only to the Interim Clinical Considerations for the use of COVID-19 Vaccines Currently Approved or Authorized in the United States.

    The accepted COVID-19 vaccine recommendations that will go into effect in 2023 include the following primary series:

    • Age 6 months-4 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 3-dose series at 0, 3-8, 11-16 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
    • Age 5-11 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 2-dose series at 0, 3-8 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
    • Age 12-18 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 2-dose series at 0, 3-8 weeks (Novavax, Pfizer-BioNTech)

    For children who are moderately or severely immunocompromised, the recommended primary doses are increased from a 2-dose series to a 3-dose series.

    CDC DATA REFLECTS THE SHOT IS NOT SAFE FOR CHILDREN!

    Ironically, the CDC presented data at its ACIP meeting on September 1, 2022, that confirms that COVID shots are not safe for children. The data presented were summaries of reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Vaccine Safety Data Link (VSD), a private insurance-based system that monitors hospital records, and V-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based monitoring program that relies on text messages and web surveys. 

    The data presented at the ACIP meeting revealed that within seven days after vaccination, 40-50 percent of children 5-11 years of age reported a “systemic reaction,” 10-15 percent had a “health impact,” and 2-4 percent needed “medical care.”  Within seven days of vaccination, 60-75 percent of children 12-17 years had “any systemic reaction,” 10 to 25 percent were “unable to perform daily activities,” and 5 to 20 percent were “unable to work or attend school.”

    Therefore, more than 30 percent of children in this age group had a health impact after the second shot, and booster dose, and approximately 2 percent needed medical care. 

    The CDC data clearly shows that these injections are not safe for children and teens and should be discontinued immediately. Other countries, like the United Kingdom, stopped the COVID shots for children under 12 years, except for children in high-risk categories. Sweden has also decided against recommending COVID shots for children aged 5-11.  (SOURCE)

    Government Protects the Billion Dollar Pharmaceutical Companies at the Expense of Our Children

    By adding the COVID shots to the childhood schedule, transferring liability for vaccine injuries to the federal government’s National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This delivers permanent legal protection to Pfizer and Moderna by allowing them to bring an FDA-approved shot to the market without facing lawsuits and bring in billions of dollars in revenues for the drug companies. 

    Pharmaceutical companies are not liable for injuries or deaths associated with Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) injections but can be held liable for injuries caused by a fully licensed “vaccine,” unless that shot is added to the CDC’s childhood schedule. This means liability protection also includes the adult COVID shots as well. This will allow the pharmaceutical companies to escape product liability which means the “emergency” can end, but the liability protection continues.

    REPORTED INJURY AND DEATH ARE NOT ADEQUATELY TRACKED

    Vaccine injury reports have skyrocketed since the COVID vaccines. This voluntary reporting system doesn’t adequately track the injuries and deaths associated with the shots. Individuals experiencing reactions are not reported by medical facilities in a consistent or regular basis. However, the reports that are coming in are shocking and leave little doubt that this shot is causing long-term harm to many. OpenVaers.com

    ‘Child Abuse on a Massive Scale’: CDC Advisers Recommend Adding COVID Vaccines to Childhood Schedule

    MORE READING ON THE TOPIC:

    https://lc.org/newsroom/details/102022-cdc-committee-unanimously-votes-to-add-covid-shots-to-childhood-vaccination-schedule-1

    https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/acip-votes-to-add-covid-19-injections

  • Is the CDC Making Baseless Anti-Science Recommendations?

    This is a response to a recent Health District Board Meeting by a local Idahoan:

    Thank you, Mr Labrador, for addressing the issue with the CDC making baseless, anti-science recommendations. The CDC has lost a great deal of respect over this issue. It is wise to not follow suit. However, while addressing this issue Mr. Ladrador also uses CDC proclamations to make a point that the unvaccinated are responsible for hospital admissions. This is very misleading. Please, educate yourselves on how the vaccinated are being classified under CDC standards.

    The CDC states, “In general, people are considered fully vaccinated: ±

    2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or

    2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine

    If you don’t meet these requirements, regardless of your age, you are NOT fully vaccinated.

    Keep taking all precautions until you are fully vaccinated.”

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html
    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html#footnote

    Therefore, those who are not “fully vaccinated” AND outside the prescribed two-week vaccination window, are counted as unvaccinated. This is deceptive.

    Why can’t the CDC be transparent and add a third category of partially vaccinated if they do not wish to categorize a vaccinated person who is under two weeks post-vaccine? How do we know that newly vaccinated people are not the patients currently admitted to the hospital? After all, we are using an old vaccine for a variant it was not designed to protect against.

    Secondly, the CDC stopped counting vaccine breakthrough cases in May 2021. *cases of COVID in the vaccinated.

  • https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html

    • This was roundly criticized by scientists and doctors. Many shared the same concern in neglecting to follow the real data and ensure we are protecting our most vulnerable population. If the vaccine cannot stop transmission, how can we protect the vulnerable? Will we create more variants with a leaky vaccine and will these strains negatively impact our children?

    Thirdly, data collected is year-to-date. This is a major issue in that the CDC is muddying the data by counting unvaccinated persons before the vaccine was widely administered.

    “Two-thirds of 2021 cases and 80 percent of deaths came before April 1, when only 15 percent of the country was fully vaccinated, which means calculating year-to-date ratios means possibly underestimating the prevalence of breakthrough cases by a factor of three and breakthrough deaths by a factor of five. And if the ratios are calculated using data sets that end before the Delta surge, as many have been, that adds an additional distortion, since both breakthrough cases and severe illness among the vaccinated appear to be significantly more common with this variant than with previous ones.” Confounding the issue by ignoring these problems does not impart confidence among the public.

  • https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08/breakthrough-covid-19-cases-may-be-a-bigger-problem.html

    • What are the real numbers of breakthrough cases?

    The CDC’s failure to track and monitor this requires us to look at other countries with large vaccine administration. Are countries with high vaccine uptake like Israel fairing better than us? A report showed that “ Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection.”

  • https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

    • Why are we ignoring natural infection protection?

    Many of us have recovered and the public is benefiting from our robust immunity against the Delta variant and future covid strains.

    Lastly, I encourage the board to reflect on their impact on the local community. The impression in the community over the last year was that CDH was unorganized, parroting misleading CDC guidance. Many of you do not have medical credentials and the best you can do is look to professionals for input. As we have seen, science is always changing.

    Today’s guidance is based on fleeting data that will be updated and evolving tomorrow. Do you really feel comfortable making definitive proclamations based on rapidly changing data? The public has access to the same information you do. We can make decisions for ourselves.

    Please, consider slowing down on your recommendations and recognize your limitations. Perhaps your next announcement can address your new restriction of power to an advisory role in House Bill 316.

    Thank you for your time,
    Idaho Citizen

    1. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html
    2. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
    3. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08/breakthrough-covid-19-cases-may-be-a-bigger-problem.html
    4. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html)
    COVID-19 Vaccination
    COVID-19 vaccines protect against COVID-19. Get safety info and more.

  • CDC Grossly Exaggerated Flu Deaths Designed to Market Vaccine

    Have you read or heard that there are an estimated 36,000 deaths in the United States, each year from the flu? Did you see the newest propaganda from the CDC citing the 78,000 excepted flu deaths?

    “[This number differs] wildly from the sober tallies recorded on death certificates — by law, every certificate must show a cause — and reported by the official agencies that collect and keep vital statistics.”

    “According to the National Vital Statistics System in the U.S., for example, annual flu deaths in 2010 amounted to just 500 per year…”And even that number could be too high.

    A British Medical Journal study has revealed that the number of people confirmed as having the flu virus is grossly exaggerated by the U.S. government. 

    “Only about 15-20 percent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus — the other 80-85 percent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done.”

    During the 2003 flu season ‘the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,’ Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC’s National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio.

    “The CDC’s decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade when it realized the public wasn’t following its advice on the flu vaccine.

    ‘It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.’”

    …despite the evidence that the influenza virus is responsible for only a small number of cases of flu-like symptoms (aka “influenza-like illness”).

    Almost 2 decades of deceit

    “[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”
    Boom.

    “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?”(BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

    You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

    This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

    But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

    Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

    “The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still.”

    http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/E9B963EDB28645C5ABCC22467120662D

    From a 2009 report published in “Clinical Evidence”, of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Tom Jefferson found that the portion of influenza-like illness that is caused by the influenza virus maybe just 7 percent of cases. And therefore, the influenza virus is actually a rare cause of influenza-like illness (ILI).

    Unfortunately, even though the data that Jefferson and his team at Cochrane have been analyzing for the past two decades has continued to support their findings on the (lack of) impact of influenza vaccines on ILI, their research is being ignored and was actually removed from the BMJ website.

    In a 2018 article on the Cochrane website, Jefferson writes:

    “We await to see whether anyone has the interest or the courage to develop effective ways to control upper respiratory viral syndromes. Meanwhile, our reviews will remain as a testimonial to the scientific failure of industry and governments to address the most important clinical outcomes for patients.”

  • Measles Vaccine: CDC erases evidence of abortion-tainted ingredients

    The CDC is removing listed excipients of vaccines from their official list that is made available to the public. Parents who have concerns about abortion tainted vaccines will find it harder to make an informed decision. The CDC recently removed and reworded the vaccine excipients list on their website.

    Has Merck suddenly re-formulated their vaccine this past year after decades of using WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts (aka aborted fetal cells) for the development and manufacture of the MMR (measles vaccine)?

    MMR Vaccine inserts straight from Merck’s website:
    https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf

    No.

    The CDC is trying to silently erase the evidence. It appears to be done as a marketing ploy removing controversial contents, removing words and changing around ingredients to make them seem less of a moral violation.
    This should be criminal.

    Erasing evidence…

    <<< What is WI-38? https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CCL-75.aspx#characteristics >>>

    Why don’t they want the public to know that this ingredient is used in the manufacturing process of the MMR vaccine? This appears to be an intentional ploy to confuse consumers.

    Confusing consumers…

    The CDC renamed the controversial ingredients from their printed list in January 2019. Human diploid is just a description of what the MRC-5 cell is. They are still harvested from healthy aborted human beings.

    previous excipient list

    Could it be, because they want to mandate vaccines and take away religious exemptions?

    Are We Really Injecting Our Children with DNA of Aborted Human Beings?

    The ‘grandfather’ of vaccines recently stated under oath that almost a hundred (or more) aborted human beings were used in the research and development of vaccines.

    These preborn humans were healthy and their bodies used as spare parts. Portions of their DNA still remain in the vaccines injected into our children numerous times in their childhood.

    Fetal DNA & TOXIC CONTAMINANTS are found in the final product of vaccines tested by independent labs

    CORVELVA: ‘MRC-5 contained in Priorix Tetra – Complete genome sequencing’

    Corvelva.it
    The human fetal DNA presented in this vaccine is a single entire genome, which means the vaccine contains genomic DNA with all the chromosomes of a male individual (in fact MRC-5 originates from a male fetus).

    Given below are the analysis results of different types of variants compared to the reference human genome.

    Read the full report at CORVELVA. Full Report was useful, especially page 9 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CORVELVA-MRC-5-contained-in-Priorix-Tetra-Complete-genome-sequencing.pdf

    Why don’t they want the public to know that this ingredient is used in the manufacturing process of the MMR vaccine?

    Could it be, because they want to mandate vaccines and take away religious exemptions?

    Because if people see that the MMR is manufactured with cells from an aborted fetus, that people might take issue with this?

    Because they keep saying, that there is NO RELIGIOUS REASON to not vaccinate your child?

    What about the parents who don’t want to inject their child with a vaccine that was manufactured using tissue from an aborted fetus?

    What about the parents who don’t want to inject their child with biologically active DNA fragments from those aborted fetuses?

    THEY. DON’T. WANT. YOU. TO KNOW.

  • Flu Shot NEVER Licensed For Use During Pregnancy

    The #FDA admits it has never licensed any influenza vaccine for use by pregnant women and does not have a single clinical trial supporting the safety of this practice. 

    The CDC widely and vigorously promotes that all pregnant women receive an influenza vaccine. The state health departments amplify that promotion on their websites, offices and clinics. 

    ICAN, therefore, submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the FDA, requesting copies of the clinical trials it relied upon when licensing any influenza vaccine for use in pregnant women. When the FDA failed to respond to this request an appeal, and lawsuit, ensued. In the end, as seen from the document which ended the lawsuit, it is clear the FDA has not licensed any influenza vaccine as an indicated use for pregnant women, let alone conducted or required any pharmaceutical company to conduct any clinical trial which supports the safety of injecting pregnant women with the #flushot. 

    You can view the document here.

    This lapse in safety is astonishing given HHS’s statutory obligation to ensure the safety of vaccines used by all Americans, especially the most vulnerable among us, pregnant women and unborn babies. 

    In fact, vaccine manufacturers request that doctors register pregnant patients in their database so they can track the outcome and chart vaccine reactions. Pregnant moms and their unborn babies are the TEST SUBJECTS.

    Manufacturers have effective immunity from liability for injuries caused by vaccines. It is for this reason congress made the US Department of Health and Human Services, including its agencies such as the CDC and FDA, singularly responsible for the safety of vaccinations. This responsibility demands, under federal law 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27, that HHS and its agencies assure that only safe vaccines are licensed.

    Here in Idaho, the Idaho Health Department promotes these untested vaccines by injecting them into pregnant women.

    Is this upsetting to you? Then join us as a member, donor, 5-minute activist, or sign up as a member on this website. Join thousands of others who don’t accept pregnant woman, pre-born babies and children being injected with untested vaccines that the real-world data has proven that they are indeed not safe. 

  • A Call for a Separation of Pharma and State

    From the public comment segment of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Board meeting to vote on adding additional vaccine schedules to the current CDC schedule.

    “My name is Jaclyn Gallion. I am on the board of Informed Choice WA, I represent 1000’s of parents and citizens across the state of Washington who are done with following or trusting anything coming from ACIP.

    You recently recommended two vaccines with new adjuvants that were never safety tested with other adjuvanted vaccines, admitting that in the real world, they would likely be administered with other vaccines–and you had no idea what sort of reaction that would cause. After your unanimous vote, you discussed safety signals that had appeared in clinical trials, and you said you would be watching postmarket reporting for reactions. 

    That postmarket surveillance is us, the public, and we did not agree to participate in safety trials. No warnings are being given to people receiving these new vaccines. You simply handed the American public over to the pharmaceutical company like dispensable guinea pigs.

    These are just two recent examples of how you are putting our lives, and our children’s lives, in jeopardy. It is well known that someone with mitochondrial impairment is more likely to have a vaccine adverse reaction that gets out of control and ends up causing severe injury, even autism.
    Former CDC Director Julie Gerberding– now at Merck — admitted this on TV, so did Dr. Kelley and Dr. Zimmerman from Johns Hopkins, recently under oath. Children with mitochondrial impairment are at risk of vaccine injury leading to autism and other chronic disorders.

    Does the ACIP work to ensure nobody with mitchondrial dysfunction is vaccinated? 

    Does the ACIP recommend screening? No. You do the opposite. You say children can be vaccinated while on antibiotics — and you ignore studies that show antibiotics are one of the many drugs that are toxic to mitochondria. You ignore studies that show acetaminophen is toxic to mitochondria, and you do not warn pediatricians and parents to avoid it around the time of vaccination. Instead when vaccine reactions occur families are gaslighted and do not receive proper care to heal the vaccine injury.  Aluminum is known to be toxic to mitochondria but you allow multiple doses of vaccines with aluminum to be administered throughout infancy, and by they time they reach their 12 month or 18 month visit, the aluminum has done its damage, and the next round of vaccines sends them into a serious reaction.

    So I am here today to say No. We are done. We are done with your recommendations, done with your guidelines, done with you selling us and our children to pharmaceutical companies. Before you vote on the immunization schedule recommendation changes these concerns need to be taken into account. Know this. We will not be your test subjects. It’s time the American people call for the separation of Pharma and State. 

    I’ll leave you with a quote by Dr Stanley Plotkin: ‘science never completely understands anything.’ ”

    And still – testimony fell on deaf ears they voted 100% in favor of additional vaccines.

    #crazymothers #bravemoms

  • CDC reports 1 in 36 boys are autistic

    Nearly 4 years ago, CNN blasted this headline:   “Autism rates now 1 in 68 U.S. children: CDC“.

    At a special panel discussion about GMOs in 2014, MIT Researcher Dr. Stephanie Seneff, PhD predicted 1 in 2 children would be diagnosed with Autism by 2025. Seneff is a respected scientist who has published over 170 peer-reviewed articles. 

    Last week, the National Health Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released its latest incidence for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in American children. Their document, based on information collected in the National Health Information Survey (NHIS), reveals an ASD rate of 2.76%, or 1 in 36 American children for 2016. 

    Source: Zablotsky B, Black LI, Blumberg SJ. Estimated prevalence of children with diagnosed developmental disabilities in the United States, 2014–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 291. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017.)  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db291.pdf

    The breakdown: 

    1 in 35 children (8-12 years of age) have autism. 

    1 in 28 boys (3-17 years of age) have autism. 

    More than 6% of our children have a developmental disability (1 in 16). 

    More than 8% of our boys have a developmental disability (1 in 12). 

    The current projected rate of increase in autism to 1 in 2 by 2025 is clearly unsustainable!

    Why normalizing autism is not the answer

    Conventional recommendations call for “normalizing” autism. Examples of this are provided in this paper published on the NCBI database in the scholarly journal Front Psychology, a Washington Post article centered upon the importance of autism-friendly characters on the PBS children’s show Sesame Street, and an op ed piece featured in the New York Times from an English professor proclaiming how this change in PBS characters will help enable the normalization of autism to benefit her autistic daughter. 

    We highlight this situation not to make light of the condition of ASD nor to imply that autistic individuals aren’t worthy of the same rights, treatment and consideration that others receive. We want to impress that ASD is indeed a condition of which we should all be paying attention; not to merely accept it as “just the way it is”, but to recognize it for what it is: a progressive syndrome that is on the rise, and which there is an identifiable cause and solution. 

    Individuals diagnosed with ASD do not have to be sentenced to a life of disability and handicap. There are verifiable ways to heal from this illness that the conventional health and medical communities continue to ignore and refuse to employ for the betterment of our population.  

    The result of this patent dismissal is a continued increase in the incidence of ASD. Can our society sustain this alteration? As its effects become more acute, we continue to be affected by its impact on our familial and social structures, and economic stability. Marcella Piper-Terry expounds upon this in her paper: Autism and Families: Stress and Divorce, and the Economic Considerations. A Review of the Literature from 2012. Read more in The Financial Impact of an Autism Diagnosis.

    Another result is that anyone opposing this narrative is considered uninformed and discreditable. 

    Credible support for finding the root cause of autism

    There are a growing number of health professionals who acknowledge this fact. Some include Dr. Natasha Campbell McBride, author of Gut and Psychology Syndrome (The GAPS Diet). Others include Dr. Ray Sahelian. M.D., Dr. Suruchi Chandra,M.D., Joette Calabrese, HMC, CCH, RSHom(Na), Dr. Kelly Brogan, M.D., author of A Mind Of Your Own and presenter of Autism Intensive HD video interviews, and Kim Schuette, CN, Certified GAPS Practitioner. These are just a few pioneers in the health communities working to heal the explosion of ASD and related syndromes, caused by unnatural conditions in our food supply, soil, water, air and all environments.

    These professionals contend that autism is NOT normal. And it is an epidemic. It’s time we did something concrete to acknowledge what’s causing it. It’s time we stop saying “we don’t know what causes autism”. It’s time the medical and health communities rallied together, despite their differences, and look for something beyond genetic causes. This is because it has been demonstrated scientifically, beyond reasonable doubt, that genetics CANNOT modify that quickly. 

    This is not new information, it has simply been censored. For example, in 2011, Joachim Hallmayer, MD, leading author of a paper published in the July 4 issue of Archives of General Psychiatry from Stanford University of Medicine. Read more from Stanford University.

    “Our work suggests that the role of environmental factors has been underestimated.” Hallmayer is an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford. The study’s senior author is Neil Risch, PhD, professor of biostatistics at UC-San Francisco and director of the UCSF Institute for Human Genetics.

    Here’s why we need not accept the current trajectory of autism increase: only 4 years ago 1 in 68 children were being diagnosed as autistic. 

    Today it’s 1 in 36. It doesn’t take a large leap to understand that this scenario is not due to “heightened diagnostics”. Clearly, this situation is due to a case of epigenetics. 

    What are epigenetics? It is happening everywhere we look these days. 

    Definition of epigenetics: relating to or arising from nongenetic influences on gene expression. 

    These changes are not genetic in origin. In short, our genes are being altered in every imaginable way possible: our food, soil, water, air, personal care products, beverages, clothing, furniture, and essentially everything we touch. Each of these factors, added in, can cause changes around the genes that are capable of turning those genes off or on, as time passes. As a result, certain diseases including autism, Alzheimer’s, and other auto-immune conditions, various genes will be thrown into the opposite state, away from the normal/healthy state.

    Only something environmental would cause a change like this, so rapidly. 

    We encourage research, cleaning up the diet, removing environmental factors, and seeking out like-minded folks in our communities, both parental, medical, health and scientific. There is a WEALTH of support for those who want to heal themselves and their children of ASD and related issues. 

    Additional reading:

    15 year old autistic teen has 10x amount of aluminum in brain than elderly person

    Why diet, environment, toxin exposure and lifestyle MATTERS

    Scientific study confirms DTP vaccination increases risk of allergies

    Organic baby foods test positive for dangerous contaminants

    The impact of toxic exposure to aluminum

    Glyphosate contaminated “all natural” bread and breakfast cereals

    KBOI 2 interviews with a toxicologist on vaccines

  • When the CDC calls

    HFI executive director’s son received a ‘random’ call from the CDC regarding his vaccine status. When the caller realized that she was speaking with a child, instead of hanging up, she tried to solicit more information from him, asking if he was in a safe environment to disclose his vaccine status. He immediately hung up and told his mom. 

    What have you instructed your child to do if they receive a phone call that starts with…

    Hello, my name is __________. I’m calling on behalf of the  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We’re conducting a survey with cell phone users regarding childhood immunizations. Your cell phone number has been selected at random. This call will be recorded or monitored.

    CDC does National Surveys and their information page was updated July 11, 2017.

    According to their information page, this survey is suppose to be conducted with a parent or guardian..however the teen survey script does not appear to specifically ask if the person who answers the phone is 18 or older or a parent/guardian..A household telephone survey[86 pages].