Tag: children

  • Breakfast with a Dose of Roundup?

    EWG’s new report, Breakfast With a Dose of Roundup?, reveals alarming levels of glyphosate in popular cereals, granola bars and instant oatmeals. Glyphosate is the cancer-causing key ingredient in Monsanto’s signature herbicide, Roundup. Recently, a San Francisco court ordered Monsanto to pay $289 million in damages after ruling glyphosate played a key role in causing a school groundskeeper’s cancer. 

    EPA has denied that glyphosate may increase the risk of cancer, and documents introduced in the recent California trial showed how the agency and Monsanto worked together to promote the claim that the chemical is safe. EWG has been urging the EPA to review all evidence linking glyphosate to increased cancer risk and other adverse health effects in human and animal studies. The EPA should limit the use of glyphosate on food crops, including pre-harvest application.

    Each year, more than 250 million pounds of glyphosate are sprayed on American crops, primarily on “Roundup-ready” corn and soybeans genetically engineered to withstand the herbicide. But when it comes to the food we eat, the highest glyphosate levels are not found in products made with GMO corn.

    Increasingly, glyphosate is also sprayed just before harvest on wheat, barley, oats and beans that are not genetically engineered. Glyphosate kills the crop, drying it out so that it can be harvested sooner than if the plant were allowed to die naturally.

    Monsanto’s cancer-causing chemical shouldn’t be anywhere near our food!

    Quick Stats on Glyphosate

    • In 2016, the non-profit Food Democracy Now tested for glyphosate in single samples of a variety of popular foods. “Alarming levels” of glyphosate were found in a number of cereals and other products, including more than 1,000 ppb in Cheerios. More recently, the Center for Environmental Health tested single samples of 11 cereal brands and found glyphosate levels ranging from about 300 ppb to more than 2,000 ppb.
    • Glyphosate has contaminated our planet, and is now found in our children’s urine, mother’s milk, our bloodstreams, and our food and water. 
    • In 2015 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization found that glyphosate “is a probable human carcinogen”.
    • In July of 2017 the California State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) added glyphosate to its prop 65 list of known carcinogens.
    • In October of 2017, after over 1 million Europeans requested a ban, 72% of the Members of the European Parliament voted to BAN glyphosate and EU Member states have refused to renew the license.
    • Four countries have banned glyphosate: Malta, Sri Lanka, The Netherlands, and Argentina. 
    • Many U.S. school districts and cities have already discontinued the use of glyphosate.

    Read the full report to find out if glyphosate is in any of your favorite foods. Check out the resources below to protect your family and tell food giants to get glyphosate out of our food!

    GLYPHOSATE Resources:

    Glyphosate Herbicides Contain Toxic Levels of Arsenic 

    Glyphosate: Its inert ingredients are just as toxic

    Nampa commits to reduction of Glyphosate in Parks

  • #1 Children’s Vitamin in US Contains: Aspartame, GMOs and Hazardous Chemicals

    Children vitamin #1 Children’s Vitamin in US Contains: Aspartame, GMOs and Hazardous Chemicals

    upposed to be healthy, right? Well then, what’s going on with Flintstones Vitamins, which proudly claims to be “Pediatricians’ #1 Choice”?  Produced by the global pharmaceutical corporation Bayer, this wildly successful brand features a shocking list of unhealthy ingredients, including:  

    On Bayer Health Science’s Flintstones product page designed for healthcare professionals they lead into the product description with the following tidbit of information:

    “82% of kids aren’t eating all of their veggies*1. Without enough vegetables, kids may not be getting all of the nutrients they need.”

    References: *1. Lorson BA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Taylor CA. Correlates of fruit and vegetable intakes in US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(3):474-478.

    The implication? That Flintstones vitamins somehow fill this nutritional void. But let’s look a little closer at some of these presumably healthy ingredients…

    ASPARTAME

    Aspartame is a synthetic combination of the amino acids aspartic acid and l-phenylalanine, and is known to convert into highly toxic methanol and formaldehyde in the body. Aspartame has been linked to over 40 adverse health effects in the biomedical literature, and has been shown to exhibit both neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity. [1]

    What business does a chemical like this have doing in a children’s vitamin, especially when non-toxic, non-synthetic non-nutritive sweeteners like stevia already exist?

    CUPRIC OXIDE

    Next, let’s look closer at Cupric Oxide, 2mg of which is included in each serving of Flinstone’s Complete chewable vitamins as a presumably  ‘nutritional’ source of ‘copper,’ supplying “100% of the Daily Value  (Ages 4+), according to Flintstones Vitamins Web site’s Nutritional Info. [2]

    But what is Cupric Oxide? A nutrient or a chemical?

    According to the European Union’s Dangerous Substance Directive, one of the main EU laws concerning chemical safety, Cupric Oxide is listed as a Hazardous substance, classified as both “Harmful (XN)” and “Dangerous for the environment” (N).

    Consider that it has industrial applications as a pigment in ceramics, and as a chemical in the production of rayon fabric and dry cell batteries. In may be technically correct to call it a mineral, but should it be listed as a nutrient in a children’s vitamin? We think not.

    COAL TAR ARTIFICIAL COLORING AGENTS

    A well-known side effect of using synthetic dyes is attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. For direct access to study abstracts on this topic view our Food Coloring research page.

    There is also indication that the neurotoxicity of artificial food coloring agents increase when combined with aspartame, [3] making the combination of ingredients in Flintstones even more concerning.

    FOOD DYES & KIDS: A Rainbow of Risk 

    ZINC OXIDE

    Each serving of Flinstones Complete Chewable vitamins contain 12 mg of zinc oxide, which the manufacturer claims delivers 75% of the Daily Value to children 2  & 3 years of age. Widely used as a sun protection factor (SPF) in sunscreens, The EU’s Dangerous Substance Directive classifies it as an environmental Hazard, “Dangerous for the environment (N).”

    How it can be dangerous to the environment, but not for humans ingesting it, escapes me. One thing is for sure, if one is to ingest supplemental zinc, or market it for use by children, it makes much more sense using a form that is organically bound (i.e. ‘chelated’) to an amino acid like glycine, as it will be more bioavailable and less toxic.

    SORBITOL

    Sorbitol is a synthetic sugar substitute which is classified as a sugar alcohol. It can be argued that it has no place in the human diet, much less in a child’s. The ingestion of higher amounts have been linked to gastrointestinal disturbances from abdominal pain to more serious conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome. [4]

    FERROUS FUMARATE

    The one clear warning on the Flinstone’s Web site concerns this chemical. While it is impossible to die from consuming iron from food, e.g. spinach, ferrous fumarate is an industrial mineral and not found in nature as food. In fact, ferrous fumarate is so toxic that accidental overdose of products containing this form is “a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under 6.” 

    The manufacturer further warns:“Keep this product out of reach of children. In case of accidental overdose, call a doctor or poison control center immediately.”

    HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN OIL

    Finding hydrogenated oil in anything marketed to children is absolutely unacceptable. These semi-synthetic fatty acids incorporate into our tissues and have been linked to over a dozen adverse health effects, from coronary artery disease to cancer, violent behavior to fatty liver disease. [5]

    GMO CORN STARCH

    While it can be argued that the amount of GMO corn starch in this product is negligible, even irrelevant, we disagree. It is important to hold accountable brands that refuse to label their products honestly, especially when they contain ingredients that have been produced through genetic modification.

    The ‘vitamin C’ listed as ascorbic acid in Flintstones is likely also produced from GMO corn. Let’s remember that Bayer’s Ag-biotech division, Bayer CropScience, poured $381,600 of cash into defeating the proposition 37 GMO labeling bill in California.

    Parents have a right to protect their children against the well-known dangers of genetically modified foods and the agrichemicals that contaminate them, don’t they? GMO corn starch is GMO, plain and simple. We’d appreciate it if Bayer would label their “vitamins” accordingly.

    In summary, Bayer’s Flintstone’s vitamin brand is far from a natural product, and the consumer should be aware of the unintended, adverse health effects that may occur as a result of using it.

    By Sayer Ji, Green Med Info; |

  • Nutritionist help son fight for his life against cancer using detox remedies beneficial for every child

    My son was diagnosed with cancer, in California you HAVE treat your child with chemo or CPS will take your child away and forcibly administer chemo while your child lives with strangers. Most pediatric cancer patients die from treatment, not from the disease. In fact, it’s very rare that a child dies from cancer alone, they most often die from opportunist infections. These infections present themselves due to a severely weakened immune system, induced by the harsh and toxic treatments like chemotherapy, radiation, prophylactic antibiotics and steroids, etc.

    It seems obvious to me that one of the most important parts of treating cancer should be detoxing the body. In addition to the toxic chemotherapy drugs that are pumped into these tiny little bodies on a regular basis, breaking down a tumor with chemo releases dead tumor waste that’s extremely toxic to the body and needs to be eliminated. I’ve yet to meet an Oncologist who advises their patients to detox the dead cancer cells out. It makes sense to me that this could be a reason many cancers come back. Our bodies have the ability to naturally detox through urine, waste and sweat but that’s not nearly enough to push the toxic medications and dead cancer cells out.

    I’ve taken matters into my own hands and my son has not experienced any side effects from the 100+ doses of chemotherapy he’s received. I hope you’ll benefit from learning what we’ve done to support his body. Aside from following a ketogenic diet, and implementing a therapeutic protocol for immune support, we’ve done four detox therapies for him.

    1. Castor Oil Pack Detox

    The castor oil pack is specifically for detox. In my experience, it’s very effective when dealing with non-cancerous uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts. Other conditions which seem to respond well include headaches, liver disorders, constipation, intestinal disorders, gallbladder inflammation or stones, conditions with poor elimination, nighttime urinary frequency, and inflamed joints. My son holds the castor oil pack against his liver for at least 20 minutes (the length of a cartoon) and does this five nights a week.

    Some details should you and your medical professional decide to use castor oil packs:

    It’s not to be used during pregnancy, heavy menstrual flow, or the presence of internal bleeding. Click here to read the procedure and the supplies needed.

    You may fall asleep and wear the pack all night if needed. If using a heating pad, unplug it before falling asleep.

    For maximum effectiveness, apply the pack as often as possible – at least four consecutive days per week for at least 4-6 weeks.
    Daily use provides the most beneficial effects.

    2. Detox Bath with Epsom Salt and Baking Soda 

    The sulfates in Epsom salt help flush toxins and heavy metals from the cells, easing muscle pain and helping the body to eliminate harmful substances. Your skin is a highly porous membrane – adding the right minerals to your bathwater triggers a process called reverse osmosis, which actually pulls salt out of your body, and harmful toxins along with it. The baking soda helps rid the body of chemicals from food, drugs, radiation exposure, etc.

    We do these baths at least 4 days week.

    Materials we use for one bath:

    2 cups Epsom salt
    2 cups baking soda (aluminum free)

    Procedure we use:
    Add salt and baking soda to a very warm bath and let dissolve for five minutes.

    3. Green Juice
    This green juice is important to our detoxification routine. It assists in the rapid removal of metabolic wastes from the body and the rebuilding of damaged tissues. Juicing helps clear the kidneys of toxins and contribute to the proper digestion of food.

    My son drinks this juice at least 4-6 days a week.

    Green juice consists of the following:

    1 apple (to sweeten)
    1 orange
    2 stalks of celery
    1 cucumber
    1 carrot
    1 bunch of parsley
    1 bunch cilantro
    8 beet greens
    1 red bell pepper
    1 green cabbage
    1 lemon
    1/2 bulb of ginger

    It’s very important that the produce in the juice is all organically grown. I don’t recommend powdered greens as most of them have been preserved and are not in their most nutrient-dense state.

    learn more about their journey past cancer March 3rd, 2017 “Season, and her son because he finished his last treatment last month!! You can read more in this post of how they fought differently…but my, oh my…what an incredibly long journey!” : How One Mom is Helping Her Child Fight Cancer with Holistic Detox Therapies

  • Offit Campaigning in Idaho concerns Health Freedom Advocates

    Paul Offit has accepted the invitation of Bruce Wingate of Protect Idaho Kids to manipulate public opinion into believing there is a significant issue of abuse and neglect affecting Idaho’s children. The ultimate goal of the campaign is to change the Idaho statute to force parents into compliance of government mandated treatments using CPS and Health and Welfare. Their campaign’s target is a small group of families, who reside in Idaho, who do not use medical treatments for religious reasons. Throughout the 2017 Legislative session, Health Freedom Idaho shared the concerns that the approach being taken was a direct violation of religious freedom and the erosion of parental rights. Legislators agreed and voted down SB 1182. <See Health Freedom Idaho’s specific concerns about this legislation> Health Freedom Idaho anticipates Offit’s organization will make another attempt. 

    WHY WOULD OFFIT TARGET IDAHO TO UNDERMINE PARENTAL AUTHORITY IN HEALTHCARE CHOICES? 

    Dr. Paul Offit holds a Merck-funded 1.5 million dollar research chair at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, has stated that children can safely receive 10,000 vaccines in one sitting, and is the co-inventor of a massively profitable rotavirus vaccine called RotaTeq1  which has caused serious suffering in the form of hospitalization, surgery,  and death to more than 1,000 U.S. infants2.

    Therefore, it is ironic that he (a non Idaho resident) has joined a Protect Idaho Kids campaign entitled “Let Them Live”3 which targets the current Faith Healing Exemption law in our state. Many citizens fear the removal of this exemption to be a slippery slope to the inevitable and insidiously motivated, the end goal to further the removal of other parental rights concerning the medical treatment of our children.

    Offit stated in his December 15, 2015 video blog, that parents questioning vaccine safety hold “ill-founded beliefs.” Certainly the parents of the children that were dosed with Offit’s vaccine and hospitalized by this “preventive medicine” once held a firm belief in medical science. That is, until it killed or severely injured their previously healthy infants.

    His books, lectures and television commercials assert his belief that any public outcry advocating Informed Consent is “a threat to public safety” and is “undermining modern medicine.” Clearly, he (and his massive financial incentive) is threatened by individuals doing independent research about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of modern, allopathic medicine.

    In this video, he states that parents that choose not vaccinate their children in accordance with the entire CDC recommended vaccine schedule (which includes HIS vaccine among others) should be forced to relinquish their children to the State.  4 

    Dr. Paul Offit has joined a Statewide campaign calling for changes in our state laws force parental compliance with the use of CPS and Health and Welfare. It begs the question from Health Freedom Advocates, “Is Dr. Offit sincerely interested in protecting Idaho’s children or just self-interested?”

    MORE RESEARCH RESOURCES: 

    RotaTeq Virus ADVERSE REACTIONS

    2 Reports on VAERS (June 15, 2016) for the Offit/Merck Rotateq vaccine introduced in 2006 list 1,135 cases of intussusception with 10 accompanying deaths  (1 in 107) while Rotarix (introduced in 2008) has 583 cases of intussusception  and 11 deaths  (a very disturbing rate of 1 in 50).

    RotaTeq Virus CONTAMINATION

    On May 7, 2010, the FDA announced that RotaTeq vaccine was contaminated with DNA from two porcine circoviruses: PCV1 and PCV2.  To date, the vaccine manufacturer, Merck, has not given any information regarding if, or when, PCV1 and PCV2 will be removed from this vaccine.  Although PCV1 has not been associated with clinical disease in pigs, PCV2 is a lethal pig virus that causes immune suppression and a serious wasting disease in baby pigs that damages lungs, kidneys, the reproductive system, brain and ultimately causes death.  The FDA recommended temporary suspension of the use of Rotarix vaccine on March 22nd after DNA from PCV1 was identified in Rotarix, but did not call for suspension of the use of RotaTeq vaccine after PCV2 was found in RotaTeq. On June 1st, NVIC called on Merck to voluntarily withdraw RotaTeq from the market until PCV2, especially, is removed from the vaccine.
    _________________
    Millions of Children Infected with “Vaccine Safety Expert’s” Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit.

    Paul Offit says you can safely administer 10,000 vaccines to infants at once. But he also profits from the patent he holds for the Rotateq vaccine. What’s wrong with this picture?
    A 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar-grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live Simian Retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years causing great harm.  Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they cannot be removed.
  • Let’s Talk About The Threat of Toxins On Our Children

    HFI: Toxins and Our Kids. Tiny amounts of lead, chemical flame retardants and organophosphate pesticides such as Round Up, among other toxins, course through the blood of nearly every American. But just how much worry is a little poison worth?


    A lot, especially when considering the cumulative effects of this chemical cocktail on children. 
    Our children are a sicker generation than their parents. Neurological issues, Allergies, Ecezma, ADD, Cancer, Delays, Autism, SIDS…could it be that its the toxic environment we created that is causes some or all these issues?  Experts agree on one big problem: We’re not really looking at the long term impact of chemicals on our children. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for example, has only required toxicity testing for around 200 of the more than 80,000 chemicals permitted for use in the U.S. “By allowing children to be exposed to toxins or chemicals of unknown toxicity, we are unwittingly using our children in a massive experiment.

    Lanphear focused on six brain toxins in the 2014 video: lead, mercury, organophosphate (Round Up) pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), bisphenol A (BPA) and polybrominated dipenyl ethers (PBDEs), a chemical flame retardant that his research team this year linked to IQ deficits and hyperactivity. This list of chemical brain-drainers, according to a study published in February, may be just the tip of the iceberg.

    While suggesting that the “ultimate solution” is to “revise how we regulate chemicals,” Lanphear offered a few suggestions for consumers navigating toxins: Eat fresh or frozen foods, choose fish low in mercury, avoid the use of pesticides in and around the home and check for lead in older homes.

    He also recommended writing government representatives and urging them to support regulation that reverses the burden of proof to require companies prove a chemical isn’t toxic before it enters the market. In the U.S., an overhaul of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 remains hotly debated.

    “This emerging evidence that there is no threshold for some of the most well-established toxins strongly supports the urgent need to revise” the toxic substances act, Lanphear told HuffPost.

    And while the time is ripe for that federal move, Lanphear added that it is “exactly the wrong time to terminate the National Children’s Study.” The future of the U.S. study, long-planned to follow children from birth to adulthood, tracking factors such as exposure to toxic chemicals, now looks uncertain.

    “I firmly believe that until mothers and the public become more familiar with this science not much will happen,” said Lanphear. “The hope is that videos like this will help people understand this emerging pattern of toxicity.”

    The reaction from Woodruff’s son, Xavier Woodruff-Madeira, 16, to the video is just the kind Lanphear hopes to spark: “I didn’t know that tiny little amounts of chemicals can add up to make a big difference in kid’s attention — and affect all those kids.”

  • What You Should Know If You’ve Ever Wondered If Your Child Had PANDAS or PANS (Even If Your Doctor Ruled It Out)

    SUDDEN ONSET of symptoms that present as OCD, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar, oppositional defiant disorder, mood disorder, conduct disorder, anorexia could be labeled PANDAS (Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Strep Infections) is a subset of PANS (Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome).Yes, PANDAS is a controversial. Remember hand washing was a critical piece of preventing illness and death and was controversial for decades before being accepted at the norm. It takes a determined saavy parent to follow their instinict. “For my family, something more than puberty hit one of my children years ago, and I knew I had to find resources to help her body heal. I turned to a group of well-researched moms at recoveringkids.com. Fortunately, I found that my child’s body needed the healing boost of probiotics found in ferments. We added magnesium and other suppliments and elminated processed sugar. Symptoms didn’t vanished but became managable. I am still amazed at how our bodies can conquer and overcome issues when provided the right nutritional support.”  – Julie 

    For a list of doctors familiar with PANDAS and PANS, see The PANDAS Network provider tab. Above all, if you think your child may have PANS, trust your intuition and keep searching for answers. We live in a time where many children are finding relief from their neuropsychiatric symptoms and a return to normalcy only because of a parent who refuses to give up. ~Ashlyn Washington

    What You Should Know…
    by Ashlyn Washington

    Despite its acknowledgement by the National Institute of Mental Health two decades ago and the estimated one in 200 children it impacts, proper recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of PANDAS and PANS continues to be an uphill battle for parents and their suffering children. One third of children see more than five doctors before being correctly diagnosed [1]. Diagnoses of Tourette’s, OCD, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar, oppositional defiant disorder, mood disorder, conduct disorder, anorexia, autism, and even childhood schizophrenia are the norm. Prompt and accurate diagnosis remains the exception to the rule. More often than not, savvy and determined parents are ultimately responsible for their child’s relief from symptoms.

    If you’ve wondered whether or not your child might have PANS but been dismissed by medical professionals or ruled it out in your own mind after researching, here are some myths you should be aware of.

    Myth 1: PANDAS/PANS is controversial.

    Even the most sound advances in medicine take time to be accepted. Decades passed before physicians bought into the idea that hand washing was a critical piece of preventing illness and death in their patients so it’s no surprise that the average pediatrician is unaware of the substantial body of research related to PANS that has been published in the past decade.

    In an effort to move past the controversy and advise medical doctors on proper diagnosis and treatment of PANDAS/PANS, the PANDAS Physician Network (PPN) was established. The PPN consists of experts from Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Columbia, Georgetown, NIH, and NIMH.

    In 2012, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford began their PANS Program. Since then, they’ve successfully treated hundreds of children while simultaneously conducting research and hosting an academic site. In February 2015, The Journal of Child and Adolescent Pharmacology (JCAP) dedicated an entire special edition of their journal to the latest research on PANS and PANDAS. Several additional peer-reviewed journal articles demonstrating the link between infection and neurological disorders including PANS are available here. In 2016, professors of pediatrics, otolaryngology, and neurology at Georgetown University hosted the Georgetown PANS Conference which provided continuing medical education to hundreds of physicians from all over the country.

    Surely no small town doctor, school nurse, or mother-in-law spouting their personal belief that PANS doesn’t exist would perform well in a debate with the experts at these institutions who have been successfully treating PANS for years.

    Myth 2: Labs were normal and ruled out PANDAS/PANS.

    PANS is strictly a clinical diagnosis. Expert advisors at the PANDAS Physician Network (PPN) created a simple flow chart to guide doctors on diagnosis of PANDAS and PANS.

    Notably missing from the PANS diagnostic flow chart is any laboratory testing whatsoever. Because pinpointing an infectious trigger can be helpful in determining course of action, this is addressed on page two of the flow chart covering treatment. It cannot be stressed enough that lab tests are entirely irrelevant to the actual diagnosis of PANS. Laboratory tests guide treatment, however they do not determine whether or not a child has PANS.

    Families commonly are told that their child “tested negative for PANS” based on strep or viral titers. A child cannot test negative for PANS based upon any bacterial or viral titer, nor a negative strep culture. If your doctor tells you this, share the PPN guidelines with him or her and seek care elsewhere if he or she cannot grasp this simple concept.

    It is important to note that 10% of children with PANS have co-morbid immunodeficiencies. Many of these children will have little or no antibody production despite being riddled with infection. Negative titers don’t mean they are free from infection. It simply means their immune systems aren’t functioning well enough to fight infection. Like rheumatic fever and Sydenham’s Chorea, both well established as post-strep autoimmune sequelae, PANDAS can occur many months after a strep infection, when evidence of a strep infection is no longer measurable on labs.

    When in doubt, ask for a Cunningham Panel. If your doctor is uncomfortable diagnosing or treating PANS without labs to back up the diagnosis, the Cunningham Panel can be incredibly helpful. The Cunningham Panel measures CaM kinase II as well as antibody titers against four neuronal antigens present in the brain and associated with PANS. One positive value on the panel indicates PANS is likely an appropriate diagnosis when combined with behavioral symptoms. The Cunningham Panel is based on solid, peer-reviewed research conducted by Dr. Madeleine Cunningham, an expert in post-strep autoimmune sequelae. More information can be found here.

    Myth 3: My child’s onset was not abrupt, so it can’t be PANS.

    PANDAS and PANS have been narrowly defined for political reasons and research purposes. The “abrupt onset” requirement for diagnosis has had the unfortunate consequence of allowing countless children with slow declines to fall through the cracks.

    The abrupt onset criteria was important for pushing PANDAS and PANS past its controversial history. Similarly, narrowly defining a homogeneous group of patients has been important for research purposes. This does not mean that children with a chronic or static presentation will not find dramatic relief from their symptoms with the same treatments successfully used in abrupt onset cases. Stanford, a leader in research and treatment of PANS, reported that only 40% of patients they treated had abrupt onset. The remaining 60% had a sub acute/insidious onset.

    Myth 4: My child only has a few symptoms of PANS, not every one, so it must not be PANS.

    Diagnosis of PANS requires either OCD or avoidant/restrictive food intake, paired with only two of the following symptoms: anxiety, depression, emotional lability, irritability, aggression, oppositional behaviors, behavioral/developmental regression, deterioration in school performance, sensory or motor abnormalities, sleep disturbances, enuresis, or urinary frequency [2].

    For political reasons, tics were removed from the official PANS diagnostic criteria. Tics, paired with any two of the above symptoms, are widely regarded as diagnostic by the majority of PANS experts in the field.

    Myth 5: My child was under age three or beyond puberty when their symptoms began, so it can’t be PANS.

    From the PANDAS Physician Network: “PANS has no age limitation. The age cap was based upon studies that indicated that 98% of 12-year-olds have immunity against strep infections and therefore could not develop post-streptococcal sequelae, such as PANDAS. However, the intent of the criteria was to define a homogeneous group of patients for research and not to preclude post-pubescent patients from receiving a PANDAS diagnosis, if all other criteria were met.”

    Myth 6: My child has many of these symptoms but it’s just because he has autism.

    Autism and PANS can be indistinguishable, especially when symptoms begin before age three. Soon to be published research has revealed that many children with autism have the same elevated anti-neuronal antibodies measured by the Cunningham Panel as children with PANS. PANS should always be considered in the presence of regressive autism. Obsessive-compulsive, repetitive, and anxious behaviors seen so often in autism may result from PANS. Treatment for PANS can result in relief for these children. Child and adolescent psychiatrist Dr. Susan Daily presents a school-aged boy diagnosed with ADD and autism treated for PANS with dramatic improvement here.

    Myth 7: My child isn’t concerned with germs or obsessed with hand washing so he doesn’t meet the OCD criteria for PANS.

    OCD encompasses much more than just concern over cleanliness or germs. The Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale checklist that notes various OCD behaviors can be found here.

    Some of the symptoms listed above as well as on the PPN indicative of OCD include:

    • Aggressive obsessions of harm to oneself or others
    • Sexual or religious obsessions (fear they’ve done something morally wrong)
    • Repeating compulsions (examples: going in and out of a doorway; switching on/off appliances or light switches; re-reading pages over and over)
    • Symmetry and exactness obsessions (examples: books and papers must be properly aligned; every action has to be done exactly the same on the right and left side; the child has to walk exactly in the center of a hallway)
    • Ordering / arranging compulsions (example: suddenly placing bathroom items in a particular order and extreme anxiety if they are moved)
    • Counting compulsions (examples: having to count ceiling tiles, books, or words spoken)
    • Checking compulsions and requests for reassurance (examples: repeatedly asking a parent “is this okay?” or “did I do that right?”)
    • Need to touch, tap, or rub (examples: rubbing the back of one’s hand across the table in a certain way, urge to touch rough surfaces)
    • Intrusive images, words, music or nonsense sounds (examples: unwanted images, words, or music appear in the mind that do not stop)
    • Need to tell, ask, or confess (examples: child needs to tell parent every perceived mistake or sin that day in school; excessive guilt)
    • Colors, numbers, or words with special significance (examples: the color black is equated with death and anything black triggers obsessional fears; the number 3 is “lucky” and things have to be repeated three times or 3X3X3 times
    • Ritualized eating behaviors (examples: eating according to a strict ritual; not being able to eat until an exact time)
    • Hoarding behaviors (Obsessional concerns about losing something important generalize to the point where nothing can be thrown away, or useless items take on special significance and cannot be discarded.)

    For a list of doctors familiar with PANDAS and PANS, see The PANDAS Network provider tab. Above all, if you think your child may have PANS, trust your intuition and keep searching for answers. We live in a time where many children are finding relief from their neuropsychiatric symptoms and a return to normalcy only because of a parent who refuses to give up.

    ~Ashlyn Washington

    References:

    1. 2013 Survey New England PANS/PANDAS Association
    2. PANDAS Physician Network

  • Toxins and Our Kids

    Toxins and Our Kids

    During the past 50 years, more than 85,000 industrial chemicals have been registered in the United States alone.  The US is not alone as countries around the world including Canada and the United Kingdom face the same issues.  Many of these chemicals have found their way into children’s environments: in the food they eat, the water they drink, the air they breathe and the products to which they are exposed.  Some children may even be exposed to them while still in the womb.  Alarmingly, the majority of these chemicals are largely unstudied and unregulated until proof of harm is already established.  With their still developing bodies and high metabolic rate, children are the most vulnerable to their effects.  Exposure to these carcinogens by children is widespread, and the harmful effect on their still developing bodies is a cause of concern for parents worldwide.

    Children are exposed to chemicals, toxins and other carcinogens in many ways:

    • A mother’s breast milk can be contaminated with toxins that are inconsequential to adults but are a detriment to an infant’s health
    • Drinking water can often contain pharmaceuticals and farming pesticides
    • The ingredients of baby food may have been grown or treated using pesticides and other agricultural chemicals
    • Common household products (cleaners, personal care products, carpet and flame retardant found in furniture) can all be dangerous to a child’s health
    • Children’s toys may be manufactured with the use dangerous chemicals
    • Diesel exhaust and other manufacturing byproducts pollute the air supply of children

    How to we support our immune systems and the natural processes of detoxing? The Natural Health Symposium has several speakers who will help answer the question in great detail:
    • Dr Rostenberg of Red Mountain Natural Medicine will share how genetic dispositions such as MTHFR keep our bodies from detoxing and provides insights on how to work around those blocked detoxed pathways 
    • David DeHaas of Living Water Cleanse shares with us the THE ART & SCIENCE of HEALING THRU CLEANSING and DETOXIFICATION
    many other practioners will share insight in optimizing health and wellness supporting the body’s natural ability to detox from everyday toxins. 

  • Imagine a world without pesticides

    Imagine a world without pesticides

    Can we imagine a day, a year or a world without using hazardous chemicals to grow our food? I can. And we must.

    Today, people are continuing to stand up for the future of food and farming, speaking out against harmful pesticide use in Hawaii, Iowa, California and beyond even when it draws the ire of corporate bullies like Monsanto and Dow. And internationally, often under daunting, even dangerous circumstances, grassroots groups in our global network are creatively and courageously drawing attention to the harms of chemical-intensive industrial farming in their countries.

    “It has become clear that the problems we have today with children’s lives being continuously wrecked by pesticides are because of institutional failures to acknowledge that pesticides are not necessary,” charged our sister organization PAN Asia & the Pacific on No Pesticides Use Day.

    ….

    A better world

    Our vision of a better world for our children and for future generations is a powerfully motivating factor — and we’ve made important progress on many continents in recent years. But there is clearly more work to do.

    For our children, we need to push back against corporate control over scientific and agricultural policies at every level — including in our state legislatures and in academic research on college campuses. For our children, we need to advocate for buffer zones to protect them from pesticide drift in agricultural areas. For our children, we need to provide farmers the tools and support to step off the pesticide treadmill.

    If we can imagine a world for our children without hazardous pesticides, we must begin now to invest in non-chemical alternatives to provide more and more of the food we’ll need for coming generations. As the saying goes, “The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago; the second best time is now.”

    What alternatives do you use to protect your children from household toxins? Sharing information is the start of change.