Tag: covid-19

  • Masking Our School Children

    Today Central District Health (which encompasses Ada, Boise, Valley, and Elmore counties) voted 6-1 to force masks on all school children in Ada county. In addition to the fact that they have no authority to issue orders, CDH again violated Idaho’s open meeting laws today.

    https://www.cdhd.idaho.gov/dac-coronavirus-order


    This is a board of appointees. None of them are elected by the people to fill this role. Using the virus as an excuse, they are usurping the authority delegated by the people to our school boards and county commissions.
    A group of citizens who wanted to be heard by this board were treated very poorly today.

    The employees of the facility, which is funded with public money, did all they could to keep the people away from the Director, who was the only person physically in the building at the time of the meeting. The rest of them meet virtually, so as to avoid the public.


    There is no accountability.

    These people are meeting in private, making decisions about medical devices for our children, with no way for the people to remove them from this post, or even speak to them directly.
    This is NOT the Republic form of government we are guaranteed in the Idaho and US Constitution. This is an outrageous overreach by an out-of-control bureaucratic board that has zero authority to force its edicts upon the people. We will not stand for it.

    Please listen to the meeting recording for yourself here: 

    Please read this piece detailing some of the reason CDH should not be issuing mandates: https://idahofreedom.org/former-state-health-official-central-district-health-not-designed-to-issue-mask-mandates-business-restrictions/

    Please reach out to each member of the CDH Board.

    They need to hear loudly from the people. We must stop this tyrannical and outrageous power grab by people who have zero ability to stop abusing power they don’t even have. It was never delegated to them by the people.

    The one no vote (and she has voted no several weeks in a row) was Representative Megan Blanksma. Please thank her for being the one and only voice of the people and of freedom.

    Comments to the entire board: boh@cdh.idaho.gov

    CDH Director Russell Duke
    (208) 327-8501

    Ryan Stirm
    Boise County Commissioner
    Representing Boise County
    rstirm@co.boise.id.us
    (208) 781-1635

    Ted Epperly
    Representing Ada County
    2180 Ribier Drive
    Meridian, ID 83642-5130
    (208) 846-8222

    Diana Lachiondo
    Ada County Commissioner
    Representing Ada County
    PO Box 454
    Boise, ID 83701
    Lach4Ada@gmail.com
    Dlachiondo@adacounty.id.gov

    Jane Young
    Representing Ada County
    1075 N Curtis Road
    Suite 100
    Boise, ID 83706-1300
    (208) 377-5166
    Contact@FHCBoise.com

    Betty Ann Nettleton
    Representing Elmore County
    18542 SE Wilson Road
    Glenns Ferry, ID 83623
    (208) 366-7364

    Megan Blanksma
    State Representative
    Representing Elmore County
    Mblanksma@house.idaho.gov
    (208) 332-1054

    Elting Hasbrouck
    Valley County Commissioner
    Representing Valley County
    50 Hasbrouck Lane
    Cascade, ID 83611-5306
    elting.hasbrouck@yahoo.com
    (208) 382-4681
    (208) 870-5719

    Concerned father and son using air protection masks

    Concerns about Masking Our Children

    Even though there hasn’t been a SINGLE DOCUMENTED CASE of a child passing the virus to a teacher in the world and only a few documented cases of child to parent transmission our public schooled children will be forced to wear masks the entire school day.

    You might be surprised to know…

    Childcare centers remained open during lock-downs to support families of those workers deemed ‘essential’. There were NO OUTBREAKS among the 40,000 children between the ages of 1 and 14 at 1,100 separate sites for daycare.

    “there is converging evidence that the coronavirus doesn’t transmit among children like the flu — that it’s a lower risk.”

    Dr. Joshua Sharfstein at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

    There are two related reasons for this, Sharfstein explains: One is that children seem to be less likely to get infected, and the second is that when they are infected they are much more likely to be mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic. If they’re not coughing or sneezing, it’s harder for them to spread the virus to others. The New Yorker reported that Iceland, which did extensive contact tracing, found only two examples of child-to-parent transmission. (SOURCE)

    Numbers show Children are Less Susceptible to COVID 19

     Rosalind Eggo, an assistant professor of mathematical modeling from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and her colleagues have tried to answer the question “Are kids less likely to get COVID?”.

    “What we found was that people under 20 were about half as susceptible to infection as people over 20,” Eggo says.

    So kids and teens appear far less likely than adults to actually get infected with the virus.

    “And then we also found that the probability of showing clinical symptoms … so getting ill enough that you report the infection… that rose from around 20% in 10- to 19-year-olds, up to around 70% in those over 70,” she says.

    Eggo’s research was published in the journal Nature. It uses mathematical models to examine coronavirus data from six countries — China, South Korea, Italy, Japan, Singapore and Canada. The results are similar to an April study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which found that while kids under age 18 make up 22% of the U.S. population, they’ve accounted for fewer than 2% of reported cases.

    Mark Woolhouse, professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, told the PA news agency there are three main risks associated with children returning to school.

    He described these as the risk to children, the risk to teachers, and the risk of transmission in the community increasing.

    Speaking as an independent researcher, and not in an advisory role, he said:

    “Covid-19, though a very unpleasant virus, and capable of causing illness, on occasion in any age group, in fact, is very, very very rarely a serious problem in children.

    “Staff are of course adults so they are more vulnerable to infection, more vulnerable to symptomatic infection.”

    But he added that how vulnerable teachers are in school depends on whether they are considered a major source of outbreaks.

    “And so far, the indications from around the world are they are not,” said Prof Woolhouse.

    Prof Woolhouse said he knows of no evidence that suggests school staff are at greater risk in the workplace than any other adult in the workplace. (SOURCE)

    The implications of how SARS-CoV2 plays out in children are huge and were NOT taken into account when the Idaho Board of Health made their decision to mask our children.

    Mental Health and the Impact of mask mandates on our children

    Dr Lucy Wenham, lecturer of education at the University of Bristol, said the mask measures may prove difficult to enforce with very young children, and could also also be traumatic.

    She told PA: “I don’t want to say, it’s child abuse, but it seems it’s a very, it’s a traumatic thing to put children through.”

    Dr Wenham said there was no guarantee the young children would be returning to the same teacher, adding: “So, they won’t even be going back to a known teacher so I think it’s usually harrowing, and that’s a bizarre to want to do.

    “Mental health has to come first. They’re not going to read or they’re not going to learn anything if they’re traumatized by being in a very unusual situation.”

    That’s right! Professionals, experts, doctors are saying – our kids are not the ones driving the infection. Yes, we can send the kids back to school without fear! We need to normalize the life of our children and forcing them to breathe their own exhaust an entire school day is NOT NORMAL. Contact the Board of Health and your Legislators TODAY!

  • Mask Mandates on the Rise But Where is the Health Emergency?

    As local and state governments around the nation debate legislation mandating masks, let’s review what we know about the danger of the new corona virus, the state of any health emergency, asymptomatic spread, and the impact of mask-wearing.

    https://www.lesliemanookian.com/socio-political/mask-mandates-on-the-rise-but-where-is-the-health-emergency/

    Following is a list of facts, data, scientific articles and other links addressing the issues outlined above that come from https://www.lesliemanookian.com/socio-political/mask-mandates-on-the-rise-but-where-is-the-health-emergency/.
    Information will be updated as it becomes available.

    SHARE YOUR CONCERNS WITH IDAHO HEALTH DISTRICTS

    Contact information for Idaho Health Districts. Most Districts are meeting in July to discuss and vote on mask mandates for Idaho. It is critical that the public voices their concerns about the lack of scientific evidence of the effectiveness of masks and the obvious decrease in mortality for this virus. The CDC claims that testing doesn’t represent cases as a person can test positive numerous times. We should be focusing on the decrease in mortality rates as testing increases but the number of deaths has not.

    Idaho Department of Health & Welfare Phone: 208-334-5500
    PANHANDLE HEALTH DISTRICT
    Hayden | Sandpoint | Kellogg | Bonners Ferry | St Maries
    https://panhandlehealthdistrict.org/contact/

    NORTH CENTRAL HEALTH DISTRICT
    Clearwater | Lewis | Idaho |Nez Perce
     COVID-19 related questions, please call our hotline at: 866-736-6632

    SOUTHWEST HEALTH DISTRICT
    Email: publichealthidaho@phd3.idaho.gov
    Phone: (208) 455-5300

    CENTRAL HEALTH DISTRICT
    District Director Russell Duke at 208-327-8501 and by email at boh@cdh.idaho.gov

    SOUTH CENTRAL HEALTH DISTRICT
    CONTACT FORM https://www.phd5.idaho.gov/contact-us/

    EASTERN HEALTH DISTRICT
    EIPH COVID-19 HOTLINE(208) 522-0310 or
    (855) 533-3160 toll free
    Email Us

    SOUTHEASTERN HEALTH DISTRICT
    COVID-19, call our hotline at 208.234.5875
    Contact form: https://www.siphidaho.org/contact_us.php

    There is no health emergency – deaths are declining and hospital bed utilization is low

    The whole purpose of the lockdown and other measures was to flatten the curve so as not to overwhelm our hospital systems and despite media reports of rising cases, deaths and hospitalizations continue to trend down having peaked in late April. (See graphic below.)


    At this point “the curve” in Idaho is non-existent with CDC estimating 70 beds with Covid-19 patients representing 1.7% of available beds, based on 80% of hospital reporting.

    We cannot determine whether these are patients who went to the hospital from Covid-19 or for another reason and then tested positive. After some calls, I was told that St. Lukes in Idaho, one of our biggest hospital chains, is testing everyone who is admitted to the hospital or comes in for a procedure. St. Alphonsus (the other big change) is only testing pre-surgery. This means a patient could go in for a heart condition and test positive, then be counted as a Covid-19 case.

    Also, the Idaho website on corona states, “COVID-19 may have been the underling [sic] cause of death or contributed to the death.” That means people have died with COVID-19 not from it but have been counted as COVID deaths. What we don’t know is how many.
    https://public.tableau.com/profile/idaho.division.of.public.health#!/vizhome/DPHIdahoCOVID-19Dashboard_V2/Story1


    CEO’s of hospitals in Texas clearly state the case numbers and hospital bed situation are being distorted. Same for Florida.


    Up to 80% of test-positive people have NO symptoms. Even 60% of those 70-79 have no symptoms  Over 95% of people have moderate symptoms.

    Up to 60% of all people already have background immunity due to previous coronavirus infections which are the common cold. 

    The median age of those who died is over 80 years and only 4% of those had no serious underlying conditions. The age and risk profile of the deaths corresponds to normal mortality patterns. 

    Up to 30% of the deaths were caused by the lockdown itself, panic, and fear, not the virus.

    Blaine County, ID, one of the nations HOTTEST SPOTS making national news for weeks, has reported 5 deaths from Covid-19 out of over 5000 cases. That equals a fatality rate of 0.1% – the same as the normal seasonal flu.

    Asymptomatic Spread

    On June 8th, WHO admitted that asymptomatic spread of the virus is “very rare.”  The WHO official stated (beginning at 1:16), “What portion of asymptomatic individuals actually transmit?…We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing, they’re following asymptomatic cases, they’re following contacts, and they not finding secondary transmission onward, it’s very rare. And much of that is not published in the literature. From the papers that are published….it still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual transmits onward…But from the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

    The following day WHO and the media attempted to put that genie back in the bottle by reporting “Maria Van Kerkhove says she accepts models show up to 40% of infections come from asymptomatic people.” To be clear, the models (which were disastrously wrong) show that, but the real world data shows otherwise, as she stated the previous day. CNBC Archive.

    Research and Information on Masks:

    Mask wearing is bad for your health. Masks reduce our flow of oxygen and cause a condition called hypoxia or low oxygen levels in the body. Hypoxia can cause heart attacks, strokes, seizures, death and more. Low oxygen levels stress the body resulting in increased cortisol. Cortisol suppresses the immune system rendering people MORE susceptible to illness. 


    WHO warns that “the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks” PDF

    WHO’s most recent recommendations say the following: “Masks can be used either for protection of healthy persons (worn to protect oneself when in contact with an infected individual) or for source control (worn by an infected individual to prevent onward transmission).”  They do not recommend mask-wearing in healthy people unless in contact with a sick individual.

    Research shows that cloth face coverings are useless at best, dangerous at worst.

    OSHA says environment with less than 19.5% oxygen is unsafe. Gases such as CO2 displace oxygen. Wearing a mask for just a few seconds causes CO2 to accumulate and displace oxygen causing oxygen levels to fall below 19%. OSHA says anything below 19.5% is an “imminent threat to health or life.”

    The 7 studies CDC uses to justify its mask policy do not support that end. They do not evaluate healthy people. They just hope no one will actually read the studies.

    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE – Harvard doctors and scientists “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.” 

    Overview on MasksComprehensive list of science on masks (covers all the points below and more)

    -N95 masks are designed to protect the wearer from dangerous toxins in the environment. They do not restrict the flow of exhalation or protect anyone else.
    -Surgical masks are designed to be worn in sterile environments – not around generally. Experts say that they should be changed every 20-30 minutes if worn outside a sterile environment. 
    -Research shows that these masks and face coverings worn outside sterile environments can become germ carriers. They interfere with normal breathing and are neither healthy nor warranted.

    While individual studies may suggest masks have an impact, there have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

    Anecdotal Evidence on Mask Wearing

    A week apart, two 14-year-old boys died in China wearing a mask during PE.

    Either I or a friend was an eyewitness to the following three cases in our little valley in the past 6 weeks:
    1) A 70 ish-year-old woman wearing a mask in the Sun Valley, ID post office passed out and hit the floor, hitting her head.
    2) A woman wearing a mask in Chateau Drug in Ketchum, ID a week after the above incident had a seizure.
    3) Ten days ago, an elderly man walking on the bike path near Sun Valley wearing a mask hunched over saying “I can’t breathe, I can’t breathe.”

    Given the very low risk posed to 99% of the public, how can any government entity justify a mask mandate, let alone a state of emergency. Moreover, wouldn’t it be a good thing for all those at low risk to get the virus and be done with it not only for themselves but also because then they would protect those at risk? Isn’t natural herd immunity the BEST outcome?

    For those afraid to speak against government overreach, I encourage you to remember Thomas Jefferson’s sage words:

    Written by Leslie Manookian of The Greater Good, the movie.
    shared with permission

    MORE MASK RESOURCES:

    https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1435/rr-40

    https://medcraveonline.com/…/effects-of-long-duration-weari…

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32232837/

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23514282/

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/…/j.1365-2044.2006.04767.x

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242931/

    Hat tip to The Healthy American, Swiss Policy Research, Corona Circus and many others for their invaluable work.
    Posted in Freedom, Health, SociopoliticalTagged asymptomatic, CDC, Coronavirus, COVID-19, flu, influenza, Mandates, Mask, NEJM, New England Journal of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson, WHO

  • Elite Medical Journals Retract FRAUDULENT Report on Cornoavirus Drug

    After concerns from 100 doctors and scientists about data integrity, two elite medical journals, the influential New England Medical Journal and the Lancet have retracted controversial papers on COVID-19 treatments. This study led several governments to ban the use of the drug for coronavirus patients due to safety concerns. Hydroxychloroquine is an inexpensive generic drug that has been used safely since 1944. Its effectiveness will cause a considerable loss of potential income for pharmaceutical companies who have already spent millions of dollars lobbying to get their ‘wonder-drug’ approved for emergency use.

    Researchers claimed to have conducted an observational study using the medical records of nearly 100,000 patients who took hydroxychloroquine or the closely related chloroquine. The four researchers said their analysis showed a higher mortality rate in COVID-19 patients who took the drug when compared with those who didn’t. The fraudulent study shook the scientific world, prompting World Health Organization (WHO) and French authorities to suspend clinical trials testing hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19, the new disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. (source)

    After publication, a 100 medical professionals raised 10 major issues with the study, culminating with the retraction a few days after The Lancet, which published the paper, said there were “serious concerns” with the data. The retractions followed stories about Surgisphere in the Guardian and the Scientist. The company only appeared to have a handful of employees and raised serious questions about the legitimacy of its data sources.

    Below is an editorial below was written by Jim Wilson regarding the bogus study the need of Americans to move forward with courage and unswerving pursuit of truth, the only legitimate purpose of authentic science. 

    A TIME FOR COURAGE, PURPOSE, AND VISION

    Great Britain’s The Lancet is one of the premiere medical journals in the world; if you read it in The Lancet you can take it to the bank.  The New England Journal of Medicine is in the same top row.  These journals published the largest study yet – more than 96,000 participants in 671 hospitals on six continents – on treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine May 22.  The study not only failed to confirm any medical benefits from use of HCQ, it “documented” increased risk of fatalities and heart arrhythmias.  The journal corrected itself one week later but the study authors claim no need to change conclusions. 

    Anomalies in the study were first reported in The Epoch Times – without claiming misconduct in so many words – but now The Guardian has thoroughly debunked the study and its authors.  Why?  Researchers published fraudulent results.  They faked it. 

    When more than one hundred physicians and scientists questioned the peer-reviewed study – that’s right, peer-reviewed – the authors at first refused to supply documentation.  This prompted editorial concern in these prestigious journals.  Among other things, skeptical scientists noted there was no ethics review and hospitals and countries in question were not identified.  Code and statistical data were hidden, but study authors did admit patients were given much higher doses of HCQ than is considered safe by the FDA; heart issues have long been associated with unnecessarily heavy doses. 

    The study claimed seventy-three deaths in five participating Australian hospitals, yet there were only sixty-seven deaths throughout Australia by the date – April 21 – cited in the study.

    The Guardian uncovered far more damning material and was less genteel in its conclusions.  They found the company behind the study – Surgisphere – claiming an authoritative database of some twelve hundred hospitals.  This tiny American company boasts a mere six employees, including a science fiction writer and a porn actress.  When The Guardian inquired of the five Australian hospitals in Melbourne and two in Sydney cited in the study all replied they had never heard of such a study, or of Surgisphere.

    The study and its authors are clearly bogus, but the question remains, why would a company go to such lengths to make a promising treatment for COVID-19 look bad?  Why are so many other supposedly authoritative persons and organizations doing the same thing?  The answer appears to be a combination of money and power.

     The Lancet study rattled scientists testing hydroxychloroquine in clinical trials because the now-retracted study suggested the drug dramatically increased the death rate of COVID-19 patients.

    The American Family Association reports the National Institutes of Health tested Hydroxychloroquine on the SARS Virus – a close cousin to COVID-19 – back in 2005 with the cooperation of  Dr. Anthony Fauci.  All parties confirmed it was both effective and completely safe when used as directed. 

    HCQ has been in use – safely and effectively – against Malaria, Lupus, and several other conditions since 1944.  

    Although double blind testing continues on the drug, reality is HCQ has been used on literally thousands of patients since the COVID-19 outbreak began.  It has been administered both early and late in the disease progression.  Its real results greatly surpass the predicted results for – say – remdesivir, which is just beginning testing and has not been formally approved as a treatment anywhere in the world.  It far out performs vaccines – such as for flu – which demonstrate 40-60% efficacy; a vaccine for C-19 is still months away and carries frightful risks for users considering the rush to develop and produce it with an extremely short testing cycle.

    Did I say money and power?


    Hydroxychloroquine is a generic drug; it is plentiful, costs less than fifteen dollars for a sixty-day supply, and can be dispensed in any pharmacy – wherever the government has not forbidden it. 

    Remdesivir – to use our same example – can only be obtained by IV infusion in a hospital, has already revealed side effects including liver failure, but will make millions for Gilead Sciences and lots of professional glory for the docs – including Fauci – who have a hand in its development.  

    Gilead has already spent two and a half million dollars lobbying Congress and the White House for its so-called wonder drug.  The trial that undergirded the recent declaration by the FDA approving remdesivir for emergency use was conducted by Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

    In a population already wild with fear of COVID-19 there is tremendous power associated with being able to say “this and only this” is the authorized treatment.

    In the case of rushed-to-production vaccines the money-power curve steepens as multiple state governors speak openly of forced vaccination for all, and the issuance of travel permitting documents for only those citizens who have the vaccination mark. 

    This is stuff right out of the Book of Revelation for those paying attention, and it has nothing to do with authentic science.  But what ought we to do about it?

    That too is not as complicated as we are led to believe.  We can ask Almighty God – in the Person of His Son and the power of His Spirit – to refill Americans with courage for unswerving pursuit of truth, the only legitimate purpose of authentic science. 

    We can likewise re-commit our lives to the transcending vision of freedom – including free market freedom – that is the vision on which our nation was founded and in terms of which we have navigated every crisis we have ever encountered.   

    These three things need be acknowledged: It is time to renew courage, purpose, and vision.  Political and medical manipulators and arrogant power mongers are unwelcome at a table meant for honest conversation.  And we were born for such a time as this.  This is all good news if we will have it so.

    By James Wilson

    James A. Wilson is the author of Living As Ambassadors of Relationships, The Holy Spirit and the End Times, Kingdom in Pursuit, and his first novel, Generation – available at Barnes and Nobles, Amazon, or at praynorthstate@gmail.com

    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/two-elite-medical-journals-retract-coronavirus-papers-over-data-integrity-questions

    feature image A pharmacy tech pours out pills of hydroxychloroquine at Rock Canyon Pharmacy in Provo, Utah, on May 20, 2020. (George Frey/AFP via Getty Images)

  • Contact Tracing, Testing, Forced Quarantine in Idaho

    Contact Tracing, Testing and ultimately forced Quarantine are the next big step, we are told, to opening up the economy. Governor Little placed the state of Idaho in a state of extreme emergency and implemented IC 46-601 placing the entire state under martial law. Data gathered since March 26, 2020, reflects that the COVID-19 illness accounts for the death of one person a day in Idaho. Using this current data, it’s hard to consider that Idaho is under an extreme emergency situation (other than the one created by Governor Little’s reaction to COVID-19).

    However, Governor Little IGNORING the statistical data announced Idaho will invest $7 million from the federal CARES Act to expand its contact-tracing capabilities, with plans to employ 255 contact tracers statewide to test and trace citizens of Idaho.

    The lack of privacy should be of great concern to every American. Parents are especially alarmed by the CDC comments that there would need to be ‘social services’ to wrap around to those who are contacted, tested, and confirmed positive.

    Miste Karlfeldt, of Health Freedom Idaho, discusses these concerns with Attorney Colton Boyles of Boyles Law. Together they hope to empower parents by giving them the legal tools to make fundamental decisions for their families. They hope to inspire We The People to stand firm on their natural rights which are protected by the Constitution. 

    RESOURCES:

    Gov. Brad Little announced Idaho will invest $7 million from the federal CARES Act to expand its contact-tracing capabilities, with plans to employ 255 contact tracers statewide. https://www.idahopress.com/eyeonboise/the-future-of-contact-tracing-in-idaho-link-to-full-story/article_736df2a1-687b-592c-b8d6-f92f84d77e21.html

    The CDC Contact tracing manual calls on state health departments to provide ‘social services’ support to families that might not have the resources to quarantine in a single room in the house. Single parents and those living in generational living situations are the targets of social service support which could include the removal of uninfected children from the home by social services. (page 37)

    Contact Tracing and YOUR KIDS!

    The COVID Tracing Manual for Idaho proposes creating five priority levels for testing. At the top of the pyramid is health care workers who have COVID symptoms and residents of nursing homes. At the next level are the inmates and employees of the state’s correctional facilities.

    Governor Brad Little says the state needs to also step up its contact tracing abilities. He says Idaho is on its way to having 500 people as CONTACT TRACERS.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LXj7thk9-iFiZGKeeterPw8YpbRgZHvs/view?fbclid=IwAR1fOfgxEJVUj5YnlxCTqYiU8ytGnUUJqtXBAG-O2uT-gt-qMdqmpVeZeaA

  • COVID narrative is virtually collapsed

    A new report out from the CDC shows the death rate from the virus is likely 0.2% -THAT’S 2 TENTHS OF A PERCENT- very similar to what many doctors and scientists have been saying all along. That’s very similar to a bad flu season. At the same time more research is showing the virus is more widespread than believed meaning tens of millions have been exposed and had very mild symptoms or no symptoms.

    In addition, the CDC reverses its stance, no longer is the virus believed to stay on surfaces for extended periods of time.

    Maybe we shouldn’t be so afraid?? The curve has been flattened. The hospitals were not overwhelmed like what we saw in Italy.

    Mission accomplished. It’s time to re-open. Not according to Governor Little!

    In fact, he announced May 22 a massive ramp-up of Testing. His power trip completely ignores the data, statistics, and recommendations have changed since the formation of the task force. Governor Little presses on using funds he allocated without legislative input to invade the privacy of the citizens.

    1st COMES PRIVACY INVASION via TESTING

    Idaho Press Reports;

    The strategy, which a governor-appointed task force of both public- and private-sector experts has been formulating over the past month, calls for expanding Idaho’s testing capacity, now at roughly 18,000 to 23,000 tests per week, up to at least 150,000 tests per week.

    “The testing demands of COVID-19 are unprecedented,” said Dr. Christopher Ball, director of the Idaho Bureau of Laboratories and co-chair of the testing task force.

    Little, at an in-person but socially distanced press conference in the Capitol’s Lincoln Auditorium, said, “A strong economic rebound can only occur with a combination of efforts, and expanded and targeted testing is a big part of our strategy.”

    “We have an impressive team of very capable local clinical and laboratory and research experts from across the state helping us navigate this crisis, and I sincerely appreciate their help,” the governor said.

    The new strategy lays out five priority groups for testing, with the first two to be targeted right away. “An example of a Priority 1 is any symptomatic health care worker,” Ball said. Another example is residents of nursing homes, whether or not they show symptoms. “For this group, testing that provides a same-day result is ideal,” he said. Priority 1 testing alone is estimated to require about 17,000 tests per week.”

    THEN COMES FORCED QUARANTINE THRU CONTACT TRACING

    After testing, comes Contact Tracing. What does that involve? This individual took the training to become a certified Contact Tracer and reports on it.

    Contact Tracing Scarier than you Imagined from FreedomLover1977 on Vimeo.

    NOW ITS TIME TO TAKE ACTION

    Contact your representative. Ask them to get involved with returning to the Capitol and representing your voice. Find your representative’s information: https://legislature.idaho.gov/legislators/whosmylegislator/

    WHAT OTHERS ARE DOING

    A group of concerned citizens filed to petition for recall. Their filing was approved and they have until August 11, 2020 to return 183,523 signatures.

    Those signatures must come from registered voters.

    He has shown his inability to listen to the voice of the people by calling in the legislature, elected officials that speak on behalf of the citizens.

    He has created martial law and extended it without any clear indication of crisis.

    He has taken Idaho from a thriving economy to 100,000’s of individuals without work, closing down small businesses and putting families at risk.

    Comments from those participating in the Recall of Governor Little

    Not Convinced?

    MORE ON THE CDC NUMBERS:

    “…If you are under 65, in reasonably good health and do not have a vitamin D deficiency, you have only a tiny chance of dying from COVID-19.

    And if you are younger than 34, your chances of dying from the virus are so small as to be almost statistically undetectable.

    On the other hand, if you are 85 or older, are in a nursing home, have serious health problems and a vitamin D deficiency, you may be in real danger if you are exposed to the virus — but only a tiny portion of the population is in such a condition.”

    Washington Times

    The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged ita month ago.

    Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4% estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.

    Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50% asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2% – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/05/24/new-cdc-study-on-coronavirus-should-seal-the-deal-on-debate-concerning-reopening-the-country-n2569367

    MORE ON THE IMPACT ON OUR SOCIETY AND ECONOMY

    For that, we have:

    • Added nearly 6 trillion to the national debt
    • Laid-off or furloughed 50 million workers
    • Placed 60 million on food stamps
    • Gone from 5% to 13% unemployment
    • Crippled the petroleum industry
    • Created struggles in our agricultural sector
    • Ruined the tourism industry
    • Bankrupted the service industry
    • Caused an impending meat and protein crisis
    • Threatened, fined, and arrested church leaders
    • Exacerbated mental health problems
    • Shut down schools and colleges
    • Given unbridled power to unelected officials
    • Increased suicides higher than COVID deaths
    • Delayed surgeries and treatments for profound illnesses
    • Infringed upon countless important civil liberties
    • Placed 300 million Americans on house arrest
    • Not all is lost, the world’s 25 RICHEST individuals have gained $255 billion in the past 2 months
    • Our Governor has unbridled power is ignoring the Idaho Constitution, suspending almost 200 rules, messing with the election, allocating millions of dollars of funds to invade the privacy of the citizens while ruining the livelihoods of 1000’s

    And the censorship keeps the masses naive and hostile

    “All these doctors and nurses say COVID is dangerous but these people on Facebook who barely passed high school science say it safe” – troll commenting on a post regarding the CDC estimates

    The doctors who have come out to question the narrative have been shut down and censored by the channels that could reach the masses.

    Here’s a site hosting many of these videos that YOUTUBE Censored. https://www.altcensored.com

    Two videos still being hosting no Youtube..but for how long?

    https://youtu.be/MK0shLq9x6c

  • HFI responds to Idaho Gov who says, “We won’t return to normal until we have a vaccine.”

    During the April 23, ReBound Idaho press conference, Governor Little said: “We are not going to return to normal until we have a vaccine.” He added that that could be 12-18 months away. He also said he expected people to do the right thing and get vaccinated but that if people didn’t, they would change the code. The Governor literally threatened forced vaccinations. Little touted the success of the stay at home orders and said we would only normalize life if certain criteria were met.

    Health Freedom Idaho has a few questions for Governor Little:

    How do you know what will happen in one month, let alone 12 months, with this new, unknown organism? How do you know it will behave any differently than other influenza-like respiratory infections which die out in the summer due to increased sun exposure which raises vitamin D levels boosting our immune systems? Please show us the independent science that supports that statement?

    Why is the state of Idaho on lockdown when the peak in cases occurred April 10, 2020 at which point a mere 6% of hospital bed capacity was required in the state?

    Why did you renew an executive order with many factual errors?


    Recent science has shown Covid-19 was in the US as early as September or December of 2019 yet you state it was not here till January 2020. You state the need to expand our health care system capacity but Idaho’s capacity utilization peaked at just 6% of beds on April 10, 2020.

    Why do you claim “extreme peril” exists in Idaho to justify your executive order when there were only 2 lab-confirmed and 3 probable cases of Covid-19 in the entire state from April 20-22, 2020?

    Why are you perpetuating the myth that stay-at-home orders are responsible for the decline in Covid-19 cases when a growing number of studies have demonstrated that Covid-19 behaves in a cyclical way, irrespective of lockdowns? 

    Why are you ignoring research findings that infections may be 85 times as high as cases with millions already exposed or infected without incident?

    Why are you ignoring the fact that Sweden never locked down yet has experienced the same disease cycle as the countries that did lock down without all the negative effects of these draconian policies?

    Why are you supporting an antibody test when WHO officials say the antibody test may not work and that antibodies may not be proof of immunity? If antibodies are not proof of immunity why are you, an elected official, pushing vaccines which supposedly “create immunity” by producing antibodies?

    Why are you ignoring prudent policies and recommendations by experts encouraging those at risk to self-isolate while those at low risk become exposed and develop immunity as this approach would be the safest for those at risk and truly protect them?

    Why are you ignoring the research finding that tens of millions of Americans have already been exposed, without incident, proving that for vast majority of people, Covid-19 is not a threat?

    Why are you, an elected official touting one approach to dealing with an infectious agent, a vaccine, from which commercial interests will benefit, when there are many other ways to deal with and manage disease beginning with a strong immune system but not ending with homeopathy, naturopathy, herbs, supplements, chiropractic and more? Please show us the legislation that empowers you to select the winners and losers?

    Why are you promoting vaccines when no vaccine manufacturer, no doctor or nurse who administers vaccines, no health official, no elected representative has any liability for vaccines because federal legislation recognizes vaccines injure and kill some recipients? Will you be personally liable?

    Why are you ignoring the country of India which used homeopathy prophylactically on the recommendation of the Prime Minister Modi and has experienced only 23,000 cases and 700 deaths in a nation of 1.3 billion?

    Why is Idaho on lockdown when Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institute of Health recently wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%).”

    Where does the Constitution grant you the power to determine what is an essential business? Why is it safer to go to the grocery store or post office than it is to go to the hair salon or have someone mow the lawn?

    Where does the Constitution grant you the power to violate our natural God-given rights in ANY event? 

    Why do you, an elected official, believe you have any say over what we put in our bodies?

  • COVID-19 RESPONSE: People Request that the Legislature Reconvenes

    Those who acquire the COVID-19 virus have a more than 97.5% recovery rate (typical to the annual flu). The same can’t be said for the 77,000 individuals in Idaho who have filed for unemployment and the 1000’s of Self Employed Individuals who are left without income due to the actions of the Governor in response to the 41 deaths reported from the COVID-19 virus. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of onions and potatoes are being dumped and wasted by Idaho Farmers, leaving them without profit and our state without their food. And yet, Governor has announced today that this #stayhome order will continue through the end of the month.

    People are beginning to acknowledge that his response is inappropriate for our economy and our state’s well-being and are asking, “What can we do?” CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATORS IMMEDIATELY!

    https://legislature.idaho.gov/legislators/whosmylegislator/

    Idaho’s Constitution makes provision for the Legislators to convene with a simple majority. At this crucial time when Idaho is suffering under the decisions of our Governor and the bureaucrats of the Health Department,
    We the People request that our representatives come together and speak on our behalf.

    Here’s an example letter:

    “Idaho Legislator: Please consider coming together to discuss the Governor’s actions as a body. The executive branch should not be making these decisions without calling the people’s representatives to a seat at this decision-making table. Idaho Constitution Article 3 Section 8 does not preclude the Legislature from convening, and Article 3 Section 10 describes that a simple majority of each house constitutes a quorum.

    While the Governor may declare an emergency, he may not amend and suspend sections of code without Legislative input.
    <GOVERNOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUSPENSION OF IDAHO STATUTE>

    We the people of Idaho kindly ask you to immediately reach out to House and Senate leadership and to convene as a body immediately.

    The people MUST have a voice during this crucial time when Idahoans’ lives and businesses are being destroyed. Please do not delay.”

    https://legislature.idaho.gov/legislators/whosmylegislator/

  • UK stands down from pandemic panic

    While Idaho’s governor at the direction of the bueracrats from Health and Welfare was locking the state down in a 21-day-long ‘house arrest’ and economically disastrous plot, elsewhere in the world the pandemic panic is winding down. March 19 in the UK, Coronavirus COVID-19 has been taken off the high consequence infectious diseases list.

    COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK.

    Where is the media roar all over the world—blasting out the news that the UK government no longer considers COVID an existential threat to all life on Earth? There is no giant headlines indicating that the dominos are now starting to fall in another direction—away from sheer economic suicidal insanity?

    The UK government, on its website, announced on March 23, under “Status of COVID-19”:

    “As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK.”

    Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria.

    They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

    The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.”

    The criteria for a HCID is:

    • acute infectious disease
    • typically has a high case-fatality rate
    • may not have effective prophylaxis or treatment
    • often difficult to recognise and detect rapidly
    • ability to spread in the community and within healthcare settings
    • requires an enhanced individual, population and system response to ensure it is managed effectively, efficiently and safely

    The HCID has passed over COVID-19 to the UK government who have as we all know has all but locked down the country.

    The official source of information can be seen  https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

  • Do All Religious Leaders Endorse Abortion Tainted Vaccinations?

    Devout parents who are worried about vaccines object to ingredients containing residual material from pigs or morally reprehensible DNA strands from aborted human fetuses. The New York Times published an article stating, “Top Jewish and Islamic scholars, the Vatican endorse vaccinations.” 

    Religious authorities have ‘meticulously studied how vaccines are developed and what is in them,’” says the New York Times. “and still have ruled that they do not violate Jewish, Islamic or Catholic law” or Christian traditions. (source) 

    In reality, State governments agencies target religious leaders. They are fed half-truths via packages of media materials on the topic. They are strongly encouraged to sway their parishioners to comply with state-mandated liability-free medical products that violate the body and contradict scriptures. Avoiding persecution by the state, some religious leaders ‘vigorously endorse vaccination’ and often avoid discussions with dissenting parishioners on the topic. Dodging church conflict, they parrot the public health propaganda of ‘safe and effective’ and ‘greater good’ mantra. 

    What of the concerns from members who abhor abortion and reject the notion that injecting their healthy child with a disease mixed with toxins created on the body parts of aborted human beings?

    Here is a recent example attempting to stem the tide of concern of millions of Christians regarding this issue author Joe Carter writes in the Gospel Coalition Article on vaccinations:

    “There are currently no vaccines created by using cells directly taken from the bodies of aborted fetuses. However, there are some vaccines created from cell lines (such as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C6, and WI-26) that were derived from tissue taken from aborted fetuses from the 1960s.”

    You could phrase what Joe Carter stated another way: Aborted baby cell strains are used in vaccine development for vaccines currently on the CDC schedule.

    Updated to include: The fact is the two COVID 19 being distributed under FDA Emergency Authorization are also manufactured using the aborted fetal cell line HEK-293. Moderna in numerous patents in the fundamental design of mRNA technology and in the original vaccine research, development, production, and testing. (see references here)

    Fetal Cells & Vaccines

    The screen shot below is taken from the CDC Vaccine Excipient Summary. This table lists substances acknowledged by the vaccine manufacturer “as being contained in the final formulation of each vaccine.” As you can see below in the chicken pox vaccine example, MRC-5, “human diploid cells, including DNA & protein” is included in the list of ingredients.

    The bottom line is that vaccine developers used cells of aborted babies to create the vaccines we use today. They were not passive actors, and according to the manufacturers themselves, certain elements from those aborted babies remain present in the vaccines. (See resources below regarding the aborted human DNA is present in vaccinations given today)

    According to the CDC these vaccines developed from aborted baby cell strains are:

    • Adenovirus
    • DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
    • DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
    • Hep A (Havrix)
    • Hep A (Vaqta)
    • Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix)
    • MMR (MMR-II)
    • MMRV (ProQuad)
    • Rabies (Imovax)
    • Varicella (Varivax)
    • Zoster (Shingles – Zostavax).

    There are no U.S. approved vaccine alternatives which were not developed via abortion for Adenovirus, Chickenpox, Hepatitis A, Measles, Mumps, or Rubella.

    The cell lines from two dead babies whose parents partnered with the vaccine developers are referred to (dehumanizingly) as MRC-5 (we’ll call him Jack – he was a boy) and WI-38 (we’ll call her Jill, she was a girl). Who were they? Both were about 3 and a half months when they were tragically killed in the womb. We are told Jill’s parents had her killed because they already had too many children, and Jack’s mother had him killed for “psychiatric” reasons. Neither child was deemed to be unhealthy in any way. Here is an MMR vaccine insert which lists Jill (Wi-38) under the description.

    These candidates are not selected after the abortion but are meticulously screened prior to. Dr. Stanley Plotkin who developed the Rubella vaccine by using Jill’s cells testifies:

    “This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well, and living in Stockholm, presumably. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children. There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.”

    Plotkin further testified that in one study alone 76 aborted babies were similarly used in the preparatory work for a single study he participated in and that he performed medical experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and babies whose mothers were in prison.

    Dr Peter McCullough, an Immunologist, wrote the book, The Fetus As Transplant Donor: The Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives, on the methods used in harvesting fetal tissue in Sweden. He writes:

    “They would puncture the sac of a pregnant woman at 14 to 16 weeks, put a clamp on the head of the baby, pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the baby’s head and attach a suction machine to remove the brain cells… At 16 to 21 weeks, they would do prostaglandin abortions where a chemical is injected into the womb causing the woman to go into mini-labor and pass the baby. Fifty percent of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys, etc.”

    Christian Leaders Claim Abortion Tainted Vaccines Morally Acceptable based on Faulty Assumptions

    “The key consideration in whether using currently available vaccines is licit or immoral is whether there is material cooperation with the evil act of abortion. If the abortion was conducted in order to harvest tissues that were to be used for the vaccine, then it would clearly be immoral. But in the case of the vaccines listed above, the abortion was carried out for other reasons and the tissue was acquired post-mortem for the purpose medical research.”

    Dr. McCullough and Dr. Plotkin’s testimony make it clear : It’s not like these researchers would just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue. 

    Catholic Religious Leaders “wash their hands of guilt” and encourage vaccination for ‘common good’

    The National Catholic Bioethics Center : “Upon use, one should register a complaint with the manufacturer of the products as an acceptable form of conscientious objection,” the statement says. “This signals opposition to the wider, morally reprehensible practice of using the unborn as little more than research material for science.”

    “There is no moral obligation to register such a complaint in order to use these vaccines,” it says, adding that “it should be obvious that vaccine use in these cases does not contribute directly to the practice of abortion since the reasons for having an abortion are not related to vaccine preparation.”

    The above statement the Catholic leaders completely ignore the proof that abortions were performed in a manner to specifically use the innocent unborn as spare parts for the intent purpose of the research and manufacturing vaccination.  

    According to the National Network for Immunization Information (NNii) the reason they used aborted babies is because “human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”

    Others, in agreement with McCullough, dispute the need for such practices to develop vaccines.

    Either way, if you adopt the CDC vaccination schedule, you can’t avoid abortion tainted vaccinations.

    Above is an excerpt of a 5 part series on Christians and Vaccinations that can be found at NewCityTimes.com

    Vaccine Exemptions Protect Religious Freedom

    RESOURCES: 
    No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:

    part part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsCAUKUTb20

    part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5b9xsGZs1E

    part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UVZSs9vgYQ

    part 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5y9mYQQmt4

    A portion of the resources from COGforlife.org website (posted her as a redundancy visit their site for the full article) 

    Quoting:

    Importantly, the new data supports NIAID’s approach to a gene-based vaccine for COVID-19 and will also be useful in other vaccine approaches including protein-based vaccines and other nucleic acid or vector-based delivery approaches. NIAID scientists designed the stabilized spike antigen based on previous knowledge obtained from studying other coronavirus spike structures. NIAID and the biotechnology company Moderna, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, are developing a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, which directs the body’s cells to express the spike in its prefusion conformation to elicit an immune response.

    And the Materials and Methods show the 293 cells.

    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/suppl/2020/02/18/science.abb2507.DC1/abb2507-Wrapp-SM.pdf

    And if that is not enough, Moderna’s use of HEK is not new…previous patents in 2015 show its use as well.  Use the Find function and type in HEK in the search…it’s listed 76 times.

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=8,999,380.PN.&OS=PN/8,999,380&RS=PN/8,999,380

    Also – more here showing how HEK-293 cells are used with the Spike S protein:

    https://www.sinobiological.com/research/virus/human-coronavirus-spike

    https://www.acrobiosystems.com/P3098-2019-nCoV-%28COVID-19%29-S-protein-Full-Length-%28R683A-R685A%29-His-Tag.html

    https://www.biovendor.com/sars-cov-2-2019-ncov-spike-glycoprotein-s1-hek293-recombinant-2?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=organic

    Now, if you still need convincing that Moderna is using HEK-293 cells, this  is straight from their own website:

    https://www.modernatx.com/newsroom/publications

    And from their Publications page, see this link:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-020-0163-z

    Since it deals with lung infection (which Covid-19 causes) it seems like a pretty good reference to what they are doing.  The use of 293 cells is cited in several places including in the supplementary information.  That is linked here:

    https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41541-020-0163-z/MediaObjects/41541_2020_163_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

    The very first paragraph shows the use of 293 cells IN THE CONSTRUCTION. The authors of the study are both Merck and Moderna.

    And in July 2020: An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report

    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483

    Which clearly states they are using the Spike protein which some have tried to deny.

    Under  Vaccine – Quoting:

    The mRNA-1273 vaccine candidate, manufactured by Moderna, encodes the S-2P antigen, consisting of the SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein with a transmembrane anchor and an intact S1–S2 cleavage site. S-2P is stabilized in its prefusion conformation by two consecutive proline substitutions at amino acid positions 986 and 987, at the top of the central helix in the S2 subunit.8

    And voila – Reference no. 8 at the bottom of the page is none other than:

    Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020;367:1260-1263.

    In addition, both the Protocol https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483/suppl_file/nejmoa2022483_protocol.pdf

    and Supplemental Information https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483/suppl_file/nejmoa2022483_appendix.pdf  linked at the bottom of the NEJM article show the use of HEK-293.

    Also the article dated August 2020, clearly shows the use of the HEK293 as well for the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2622-0

    Just a sampling –  page 9 of the Nature article: