On August 12, 2022, CDC updated its guidelines. To the surprise of all, vaccinated and unvaccinated will be treated the same. There are no additional restrictions in place for those unwilling to subject their bodies to experimental medical products. Now, two years later, after unconstitutional medical mandates that left hundreds of thousands fired – the data reflects the fact that their experimental vaccine DOES NOT impact the death rate from the sickness.
Almost a quarter of a million individuals suffered life-threatening, long-term, or permanent reactions from experimental and liablity-free vaccinations. More than a million reports were submitted to the national database that tracks vaccine reactions.
COVID-19 death rates are nearly the same in all age groups reported whether or not a person is vaccinated. It would be difficult for the CDC to have different guidelines based on vaccination status since the data show no clear benefit of vaccinations.
“I was the father of a 16-year-old son. A single parent. I raised my boy since he was a baby. He meant the world to me. We were always together. He was my best friend. We got the Pfizer Vaccine because I thought it would protect him. I thought it was the right thing to do. My government lied to me. They said it was safe, and now . . . I go home to an empty house. He was my baby boy. They need to stop pushing this on our children. I lost mine. You need to protect yours. I love the hell out of my country, but I don’t trust my government anymore.” — Ernest Ramirez Want to know more about vaccine reactions? On social media platforms type in this hashtag: #ProtectYourChildren #WeDid
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Oct. 15 it was delaying a decision on authorizing Moderna’s COVID vaccine for adolescents while the agency assesses whether the shot could increase the risk of myocarditis, a heart inflammatory condition, the Wall Street Journal reported.
In June, the FDA added a warning to the literature accompanying Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID vaccines, to indicate an increased risk of myocarditis.
However in May, a few weeks before the FDA added the warning, the agency authorized Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for ages 12 to 17, despite the known increased risk of myocarditis.
It was also in June that Moderna filed for authorization in the U.S. of its vaccine for adolescents 12 through 17 years old.
Pfizer adds an ingredient used to stabilize heart attack victims in vax for kids. Buried on Page 14 in the Pfizer paperwork with the FDA for the Covid vaccine for children is disturbing.
Nov 02, 2021 · The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday approvedPfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5 to 11 years.
Why would the FDA allow a vaccine with such high risk? It could be the manufacturer is influencing those individuals responsible for the approval with a portion of their $36 billion in profit for the liability-free vaccine. – concerned citizen
Here is a visual of the reported adverse events to the COVID vaccines that have been available since February 2021. Notice the number of children suffering from heart attacks and heart conditions.
Reports represent less than 10% of actual adverse events. Many doctors and hospitals refuse to report. Many families suffering from injury don’t know nor have the time to submit a report as they are struggling with the impact of severe health conditions that result from the vaccination. These shots are liability-free for the administrators and manufacturers. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/covid-19-vaccine-is-liability-free-for-everyone-but-you/
“There are several children/teens in the Boise area that have suffered as a direct result of the vaccine. Educate before you vaccinate. Research for yourself what the risk of the disease is to your child. Is it worth risking an experimental medical product that has NO long-term studies? “ – mom concerned about vaccine risks
Several major Idaho employers, including St. Luke’s, St. Alphonsus, and Primary Care have stated that they will now discriminate based on their employees’ personal health choices. This is wrong and needs to be made explicitly illegal. The Governor of Idaho protected the jobs of State Employees from being affected by their COVID-19 vaccination status with Executive Order 2021-04, but this does nothing to protect those who work for someone other than the State of Idaho. No one should be forced to choose between keeping their job and undergoing a medical procedure that violates their bodily autonomy, especially one which lacks long-term data, has inherent risk, and is still only under experimental use authorization.
WE THE PEOPLE need to stand side by side with our healthcare professionals and NOT permit their employers to coerce them into vaccine mandates! Now more than ever, we need to rise up and say NO!
Here’s what you can do:
1. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS IN IDAHO LAW ARE SPECIFIC FOR CHILDREN. The medical, philosophical, and religious exemptions we talk about all the time through HFI are only applicable to minor children, and only for school and daycare attendance.
2. VACCINE EXEMPTIONS SHOULD EXIST IN YOUR WORKPLACE. Look into any possible exemption for adults with their employers are ones that may or may not be available through any given company. Please inquire with your employer. (Information regarding moral/religious exemption) Utilize the resources below.
3. UNITE! You are strong, especially together. You have the God-given right to your bodily autonomy, and you have strength in numbers. Talk to each other. Here’s a Facebook group for healthcare workers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/377518550406136/
TELEGRAM RESOURCE: #STOPTHEMANDATE
4. RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE: For detailed information about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to immunizations, see the Vaccine Rights Manuals. This applies to exemptions for employees (civilian and military), student clinical work, immigration, and daycare and school exemptions in a couple of states. Free Printable Notice to Employer Letter found at Health Freedom Defense, Detailed Manual for purchase at Alan Phillips at Vaccine Rights.com, The Healthy American also has a how-to-write vaccine exemption material. Pacific Justice Institute has a 5 page write-up including quotes from the CDC about the inability of employers to mandate vaccines under EUA.
Questions and Answers on the Covid-19 Vaccine Pacific Justice Institute July 2, 2021 Question: Can my employer order me to be vaccinated against Covid (also referred to as COVID-19, novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2) and can they threaten to fire me if I do not comply? Answer: First, no one can force you to take the Covid vaccine, because it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The vaccine is currently being administered under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) because the vaccines were not studied for a sufficient time to ensure there are no long-term side effects. There are a number of authorities and resources you can cite that show you cannot be forced to take a vaccine. Consider the following four examples:
The EUA itself, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3, requires “. . . Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product . . .”1
Each person who is about to receive a Covid vaccine is given a fact sheet, which states in part: “WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET THE (insert drug company name) COVID-19 VACCINE? It is your choice to receive or not receive the (insert drug company name) COVID-19 Vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.”2
In the 2004 case of Doe v. Rumsfeld, 3 plaintiffs challenged the government’s Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program (AVIP), because anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) had never been approved by the FDA as a safe and effective drug for protection against inhalation anthrax. Yet the government was forcing military personnel to take the vaccine. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an injunction 1 See, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 – Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. Subsection (e)(1)(A)(ii) 2 See, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html. 3 Doe v. Rumsfeld, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21668. visit Pacific Justice Institute to download your complete copy.
Print/Forward this Letter from Attorney from American Frontline Doctors to Saint Alphonsus Regarding Vaccine Mandates. Download it below.
5. USE THE ‘NOTICE TO THE EMPLOYER‘ PROVIDED BY HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE Health Freedom Defense has a one-page notice that clearly delineates that a COVID VACCINE MANDATE is in violation of the federal statute. Health Freedom Defense Fund can send a cease and desist letter and possibly initiate further legal action. In addition Contact Health Freedom Defense regarding your situation. Submit your information including your explanation of the situation, the company name and address, the name of the CEO of the company, and his or her email address can be emailed to info@healthfreedomdefense.org.
7. SHARE YOUR SITUATION WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS Let your representatives in the government know how this mandate is affecting your employment, livelihood, and bodily autonomy. Explain the discrimination and ask for them to intercede. We also ask that you include HFI in your correspondence so that we can have a collection of correspondence to share with liberty-minded legislators and legal teams that are working to support freedom.
Have you been discriminated against at work because of your decision to take the shot or not? Has your place of employment forced you to wear a mask or risk losing your job? If so, please share your story or affidavit with the email below. Please include your first name, phone number, and zip code. nomorevaccinationdiscrimination@protonmail.com
Contact Governor Brad Little. Email: governor@gov.idaho.gov State Capitol PO Box 83720 Boise, ID, 83720. Phone Number: 208-334-2100
Contact the Speaker of the House: Scott Bedke (R) District 27. (208) 332-1111. SBedke@house.idaho.gov
8. ASK FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO SUPPORT YOU. Have friends and family correspond with their legislators, the Governor, and the Speaker of the House, and your employer about the fact that as patients they want the healthcare staff to have bodily autonomy.
9. JOIN US as WE STAND IN PROTEST TO VACCINE MANDATES FOR OUR HEALTHCARE WORKERS hosted by American Frontline Doctors and Health Freedom Idaho JULY 19, 2021 Location: St. Lukes on Eagle Road in Meridian 4:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Each one of us must take a stand for sovereignty and bodily autonomy CITIZENS WEAR ROYAL BLUE HOSPITAL STAFF/EMPLOYEES WEAR BLUE SCRUBS
10. PRAY! If you are a praying individual NOW would be the time to get on your knees and pray for wisdom and strength for our healthcare workers and other employees who are faced with what could be a life/death job/termination decision for their families. Prayers for our employers, the business owners, government officials, and leaders in the community to make the right decision to protect liberty, bodily sovereignty and to protect the rights of individuals to make their own personal healthcare choices without coercion.
Your right to bodily autonomy is a God-given right protected by our Federal Statues, Idaho Constitution, and numberous Idaho laws.
Federal statutes: VACCINE UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION.
“What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” – Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense
Regarding compulsory COVID-19 requirement imposed upon an employee violates federal law. 1 Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”). However, the statute requires that: individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title I of ADA Title I of the ADA applies to private employers with 15 or more employees. It also applies to state and local government employers, employment agencies, and labor unions.
All nondiscrimination standards under Title I of the ADA also apply to federal agencies under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces these federal civil rights laws in employment, has issued guidance on COVID-19 and vaccination policies. The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are relevant to employers or lawmakers crafting vaccination requirements. EEOC provides examples of potential reasonable accommodations. Examples of a “reasonable accommodation” for employees who cannot comply with a vaccine mandate because of a disability; religious belief, practice or observance; or pregnancy include requiring the unvaccinated employee to:
Wear a face mask at work
Work at a social distance from co-workers or non-employees
Idaho Constitution Art 1 Sec 4: “The liberty of conscience hereby secured…” and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions; IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.
LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOVSection 18-611FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS 18-611 (3) Employers of health care professionals shall reasonably accommodate the conscience rights of their employees as provided in this section, upon advanced written notification by the employee. Such notice shall suffice without specification of the reason therefor. It shall be unlawful for any employer to discriminate against any health care professional based upon his or her declining to provide a health care service that violates his or her conscience unless the employer can demonstrate that such accommodation poses an undue hardship.
39-9003 (2) It is hereby declared that the public policy of the state of Idaho, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable rights of liberty, is that every person within the state of Idaho is and shall be free to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without penalty or threat of penalty by the federal government of the United States of America. Additional Information and Resources regarding risk, statistics, and the science (that is currently being censored by mainstream media)
Informed Consent
The EUA (emergency use authorization) statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
www.c19vaxreactions.com is a place to network and see others having the same symptoms, that have been injured by this vaccine.
These hospital mandates are likely a death sentence for some of your employees as shown by the table above. Note that over 9,000 deaths have been reported to and compiled into the VAERS system. Have you confirmed which employees have already contracted “the virus” and are now immune?
LIABILITY FREE PRODUCTS
On February 4, 2020, the Secretary of HHS invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness act (PREP Act) and declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency, warranting liability protection for covered countermeasures, which includes vaccination. If an individual is injured or killed by a COVID-19 vaccine, the manufacturer cannot be held liable per the PREP Act. The only possible recourse should you or a loved one suffer injury or death is to pursue compensation through the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, which has a difficult threshold for proving a relationship between an injury and the vaccine, a short statute of limitations, no avenue for appeals and doesn’t pay damages for pain or suffering.
The liability exempt status for vaccine manufacturers is not new. Pharmaceutical companies have enjoyed their liability-free status for all vaccinations on the CDC schedule since the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. After large numbers of lawsuits were brought forth for injuries and deaths resulting from the DPT vaccine, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to protect pharmaceutical companies from liability specifically for vaccines. No other product or industry is protected from liability for injury and death in this way.
Without any liability, what incentive is there to ensure the vaccine is as safe as possible? Will the employer requiring vaccination be held liable for injury and/or death?
Pfizer’s 53 page Covid-19 vaccine document released in December states that the VACCINE DOES NOT prevent Covid-19 infection or spread of the disease. Masks and social-distancing are still required. Hospitals are reporting adverse reactions to the vaccine upon administration.
One hospital in Chicago stopped the vaccination program after several workers had adverse events. A hospital in Alaska is reporting their 4th serious adverse reaction to vaccination out of 144 healthcare workers who received it. A Philadelphia hospital had a nurse manager pass out on camera just 17 minutes after being administered the vaccine.
Please note on Page 2 below that of the 3410 individuals who got Covid-19 during the study, almost half were from the vaccinated group. The vaccine did not prevent infection!
ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINATION
In the past week, as the vaccine has been initially distributed the mainstream media reported numberous serious adverse reactions from our frontline healthcare workers. In an effort to contain this significant news the CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system.
Do you realize what this means?
You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating, or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.
Allergic Reactions Reported
“Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said at a press conference that the allergic reactions had been reported in more than one state, including in Alaska. Marks also said that a chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG) that is an ingredient in the Pfizer vaccine – as well as the Moderna Inc vaccine authorized on Friday – “could be the culprit” causing the reactions. Marks said that allergic reactions to PEG could be somewhat more common than previously understood.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-fda-idUSKBN28T05J
CDC SURVEILLANCE OF ADVERSE REACTIONS TO COVID -19 Vaccine
First report on adverse reactions to COVID19 vaccines. ACIP December 19 and 20, 2020 Presentation Slides | Immunization Practices | CDC http://ow.ly/qAWd30rpndH
CDC Assures Public that Vaccine Reactions will be Recorded
“As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC
Keep in mind, that any medical bills and long term health issues requiring medical intervention will be entirely your responsibility.
FDA – Vaccine SIDE EFFECTS
Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, let us point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀 https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.
100 FOLD INCREASE IN VACCINE REACTIONS REPORTED WHEN IT WAS AUTOMATED
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after the release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
Guillain-Barré syndrome– Weakness and tingling in your extremities are usually the first symptoms. These sensations can quickly spread, eventually paralyzing your whole body.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis – widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord.
Transverse myelitis – muscle weakness, paralysis, sensory problems, or bladder and bowel dysfunction
Encephalitis – cause confused thinking, seizures, or problems with senses or movement. Rarely, encephalitis can be life-threatening.
Myelitis/encephalomyelitis/ – rare kind of inflammation that affects the brain and spinal cord, usually in children
Meningoencephalitis/meningitis/ – acute inflammation of the protective membranes covering the brain and spinal cord, known collectively as the meninges
Encephalopathy – means damage or disease that affects the brain
Convulsions/seizures – a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain. It can cause changes in your behavior, movements or feelings, and in levels of consciousness.
Stroke –when blood supply to part of your brain is interrupted or reduced, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and nutrients. Within minutes, brain cells begin to die. A stroke is a medical emergency.
Narcolepsy and cataplexy-a chronic sleep disorder characterized by overwhelming daytime drowsiness and sudden attacks of sleep.
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.
COVID VACCINE TRIAL DATA
Certainly these 95%+ effective vaccines are safe!? Well let’s take a look at the participants qualifications and adverse event reporting.
-45 participants age 18-55 -20 participants age 56-70 -20 participants age 71 or older -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
Relying on a Vaccine is Folly. The best defense is supporting the immune system.
Dr. Nancy Welliver, summed up the issues with vaccines very nicely:“Because of the ability of viruses to quickly and continuously adapt, the odds of us meeting, as a species, novel viruses is infinitely high. This is why relying on immunizations is folly, and providing good lifestyle-based medicine is the best course.
… the virus will have hit the susceptible hosts, and will probably have mutated, making the immunization fairly ineffective, as we have seen with successive years of flu immunization. Promoting a healthy immune system is the best defense.”
There is clear evidence that vaccines are produced using the bodies of aborted human beings and experimentation of the product was performed on severely disabled humans. Some “prolifers” have agreed that since the aborted fetal cell lines were already in existence (and not created for the purpose of making a vaccine), at least some good came from the babies who died. However, they would never condone the abortion itself.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, founder and chief scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, has questioned the necessity of a vaccine against COVID-19, saying: “[w]e’re making a vaccine at warp speed for a virus that doesn’t look like it’s going to need a vaccine.”
Deisher explains that “this virus to date has less than a 0.03% fatality rate and most of those people, I believe it’s 92% or above, have other health problems.” She added that developing a vaccine in such a quick time frame “is possible, but I don’t believe it is desirable, nor do I believe that it’s safe,” with as much as “15% of the very healthy young volunteers [experiencing] significant side effects.” Many of the initial vaccine recipients have had significant adverse reactions to the vaccine. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
___________
Focus on the Family, and the Catholic Church (and other religious organizations* See below) make the argument that something ‘good’ was developed on the sacrificed bodies of human beings, and even though they were tested on severely disabled individuals, vaccines ‘morally’ acceptable.
We submit that their argument is ‘false thinking’ and as tainted as the vaccines themselves.
These researchers didn’t dig through discarded body parts to make something useful. The abortions were performed in such a way to deliver LIVE CELL SAMPLES to the laboratory for dissection and research. In addition, the principal researcher Dr. Plokin admits to unethically experimenting on children and adults with disabilities in order to develop his product that is now mandated to be injected into school children of all faiths.
Vaccines were cultured exclusively on animal tissue prior to the 1960’s (animals such as the rhesus monkey).
Culturing vaccines on animal cells was useful but had unintended consequences. A well-documented example is the discovery of vaccines contaminated with the SV40 virus from rhesus monkey cells used in its production.
In the early 1960’s, Dr. Leonard Hayflick was the first researcher who set out to create a “fetal cell line” for use in culturing vaccines instead of using animal tissue.
A fetal cell line is derived from live cells taken from an aborted baby. The live cells are modified so they can replicate indefinitely.
In 1962, Dr. Hayflick developed the first fetal cell line called WI-38 (Wistar Institute, 38th fetal sample) from the lung tissue of an aborted 31 week gestation baby girl.
The data in his 1961 and 1965 papers show at least 23 aborted babies used in the research around the creation of WI-38. The number is likely higher, given that some of the cell strains he researched were not documented in his published papers.
Fetal cell line WI-38 is currently being used in the
Next, in 1964 Dr. Stanley Plotkin isolated a rubella virus strain, RA 27/3 (Rubella Abortus, 27th fetus, 3rd tissue culture explant), that was later used in Merck’s rubella vaccine.
RA 27/3 was combined with WI-38 to create the rubella vaccine we use today.
It is well established that almost 80 aborted babies were used in the research leading to the development of RA 27/3. Dr. Plotkin’s 1969 article cites 76 of those abortions.
Dr. Plotkin’s value of life is revealed through his actions. He tested his rubella vaccine on orphans as young as 14 months old and “seronegative mentally retarded children”.
In a letter to the editor, he defended his colleagues’ unethical experimental research on those with disabilities at Willowbrook Hospital. He stated that “performing initial studies on children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential… nonfunctioning persons” is acceptable, even preferred. He went on to state, “Morality must be defined by circumstances and facts.”
12. In 1966, researchers at the Medical Research Council in the UK developed the fetal cell line MRC-5, from a 3 1/2 month gestation baby boy who was aborted for psychiatric reasons from a physically healthy 27 year old mother.
13. MRC-5 is used in numerous vaccines today, including:
CDC Vaccine Excipient Guide information is now being censored. The CDC has ‘updated’ their list without any changes to the vaccines themselves.
14. After their initial creation, each fetal cell line is reproduced many times over. Though they theoretically reproduce indefinitely, they have a finite lifespan of use, as they become more oncogenic (tumor-causing/cancerous) with each reproduction.
15. Due to the finite nature of the use of the current fetal cell lines, researchers have (since the 1960’s) continued to this day using aborted babies in their work toward creating new fetal cell lines.
16. Here’s a list of just a few fetal cell lines created in the years since WI-38, RA 27/3, and MRC-5 (with links to where some of these aborted fetal cells can actually be purchased): WI-44, MRC-7, MRC-9, HEK 293, PER.C6, IMR-90, IMR-91, TIG-1, Walvax-2.
17. The most recent fetal cell line, Walvax-2, was developed by Chinese researchers in 2015 using a 3-month gestation baby girl.
18. Walvax-2 researchers matter-of-factly describe intentionally aborting 9 babies using the “water bag method” of abortion. It’s illegal in the United States. As little value as our country places on life, this practice is so inhumane it is still banned in America. In layman’s terms, the mother’s uterus is filled with saline water so the baby can essentially be floated out of her uterus alive and in-tact. The baby is then given straight to researchers who quickly dissect them alive because a viable fetal cell line requires live cells. In the researcher’s own words, the “tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.”
19. These aborted babies were used for research in 2015, not 60 years ago. It is a current and ongoing practice.
20. Walvax-2 was specifically developed as a replacement for the aging MRC-5 cell line. It was tested with rabies, hepatitis, and Varicella viruses, and was found to be “equal or superior to MRC-5 cells for cultivating these viruses”.
Dissecting aborted babies (many presumed to be alive at the time) for vaccine research has been a consistent and ongoing practice for the past 60 years.
Researchers and scientists worked with local doctors to identify the preborn children whose sacrificed bodies would be used to “improve the health” others. The very definition of ‘child sacrifice’.
I had allowed minimal information to inform a most delicate decision for my children. I submitted without thinking critically to headlines and news articles. In the end, I allowed the thoughts of an atheist researcher with different moral, ethical and spiritual views than me to determine what I thought about such an important subject.
How does this impact the heart of our living God? As the creator and sustainer of life, I think His heart is deeply grieved over this practice.
Dr. Jay L. Wile – holds an earned Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry. He is best known as the author of award-winning elementary, junior and senior high school science courses including the Science through HisStory, “Discovering Design with…”, and “Exploring Creation with…” series. (I have these books as well and can take photos for you too)
Edward Zaccaro – Book, “The 10 Things All Future Mathematicians and Scientist Must Know (but are rarely taught)” Chapter 6: It is Important to Maintain a Healthy Skepticism subtitle The Avnit-Vaccination Movement (I have this book and the photos if you need them)
World Magazine – a magazine that is produced for youth and children to teach them a Biblical Worldview. It comes free with some curriculum
References: 1 – L. Hayflick et al., “The Limited In Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains,” Experimental Cell Research 37, (1965): 615. 2 – “Gamma Globulin Prophylaxis; Inactivated Rubella Virus; Production and Biological Control of Live Attenuated Rubella Virus Vaccines,” American Journal of Diseases of Childhood 118, no. 2 (1969): 378. 3 – J.P. Jacobs et al., “Characteristics of a Human Diploid Cell Designated MRC-5,” Nature 227 (1970): 168. 4 – Ibid.,170. 5 – Transcript of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hearing date 16 May 2001, 91. 6 – Judie Brown, “The Means of Vaccines,” National Catholic Register, April 30-May 6, 2000. 7 – J.C. Wilke, M.D., “Vaccines, Today’s Controversy,” Life Issues Connector, Life Issues Institute, July 2001. 8 – Bernard Nathanson, M.D., “Vaccines OK’d Despite Dark Past,” National Catholic Register, June 18-24, 2000.
