Tag: effective

  • Remember Polio? Infectious Disease History Lesson.

    Do you remember the polio epidemic? Do you know why these days polio is extinct in the United States? Because of vaccinations. Why don’t you learn from history?

    Panelist: The mortality rates from diseases such as, diphtheria, polio, and measles, declined by 95-98% prior to the introduction of these vaccines. See here at length.

    Also, many once-deadly diseases such as cholera, typhoid, typhus, tuberculosis, and scarlet fever, declined and disappeared AT THE SAME RATE AND DURING THE EXACT SAME TIME PERIOD AS THE OTHER DISEASES, BUT WITHOUT ANY VACCINE. 

    Therefore, the conclusion that mortality rates declined solely because of a vaccine is questionable, at best. See here at length.

    Regarding polio, pertussis (whooping cough), and influenza, the vaccines only protect the one who received them from severe symptoms of these diseases, but not from contracting the diseases and transmitting them to others. 

    (Therefore, someone who does take the vaccine is just as likely to spread these diseases as someone who does not.) In fact, someone vaccinated is more likely to spread disease, as the vaccinated could have an asymptomatic infection, and will not take the necessary precautions to avoid public places while infected. See here point number 4 on the downloadable pdf and sources.

    If we were convinced of the efficacy and safety of a vaccine against a deadly global epidemic, we would surely vaccinate against it.

    Learn more about POLIO

  • Failed Flu Mist Vaccine Returns for 2018

    Breaking News expect outbreaks of the flu this season. The CDC has brought back the (LIVE VIRUS) FluMist nasal spray. It was initially pulled due to poor “efficacy” boasting a 3% protection rating, which can more than likely be blamed on viral shedding from said vaccine. Most package inserts of live viral vaccines (MMR, chickenpox, shingles, flumist, rabies) state shedding can last for 2-5 weeks post vaccination. And if remembered correctly, last year it was noted by a study performed by PNAS, paid for by the CDC, that even those vaccinated with IM/injectable flu vaccinations had an increased shedding rate 6.3x more than those who do not receive a flu vaccination. Also, per Science Daily, it should also be noted that children who receive the flu vaccine have 3x the risk of hospitalization for Flu. 

    Why on earth would you want to spray live virus into your nostrils. Think about it! They stopped giving it because it wasn’t working! Now suddenly it’s going to work? I guess it will work at spreading the Flu…

    Late last year Health Impact News reported on a study published by The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, documenting how influenza viruses cultured in eggs mutate, making the flu vaccines virtually worthless.

    The authors of the study stated:

    Seasonal influenza vaccine does not always confer protection in vaccinated individuals. Vaccine candidates are selected from clinical isolates based on their antigenic properties.

    It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines. However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.

    See:

    Study: Annual Flu Shot Ineffective

    Is the U.S. Mass Flu Vaccination Program Actually Causing More Severe Influenza Outbreaks?

    Over the past few years, several studies have pointed to the fact that repeated flu vaccinations year after year actually reduces the effectiveness of the vaccine, raising serious questions about yearly mass flu vaccination programs.

    The most recent was a study out of Australia where researchers showed that those who had multiple flu vaccines actually produced fewer antibodies than those who did not get the flu shot regularly.

    Most people probably do not realize that the measure of success for a vaccine is not whether you stay healthy or get sick, but simply if your body develops the appropriate antibodies thought to be required to fight off the disease being vaccinated against.

    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explains this very well in the following video:

    This was not the first study to show that repeated flu shots every year decrease one’s resistance to influenza viruses.

    Dr. Edward Belongia of the Wisconsin’s Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation reported the same thing back in 2015, and a study in 2013 showed that getting the flu shot two years in a row lowered protection.

    We have frequently published an interview with Dr. Mark Geier explaining how little science there is behind the flu vaccine.

    Dr. Geier is NOT anti-vaccine. He is an M.D. and has a Ph.D. in genetics. He spent 10 years working at the National Institute of Health, and was a professor at Johns Hopkins University as a geneticist. He is also the author of over 150 peer-reviewed publications.

    He worked on vaccine safety and efficacy for more than 30 years. He was one of four scientists that worked to replace the DTP vaccine, a vaccine that caused every child to become sick with a high fever at the time of vaccination, with the DTaP vaccine, which is a more purified vaccine.

    Dr. Geier explains that the CDC does not follow the law for vaccines in requiring long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine like they do with other vaccines, as it is impossible to test a vaccine that changes every year.

    So the flu vaccine is basically an experimental vaccine that they want to give out to 300 million people every year. There are also no studies showing the safety of giving the flu vaccine to the same person every single year.

    However, Dr. Geier points out that the CDC is in the business of distributing ‘flu vaccines, because they represent 300 million doses per year, whereas all the childhood vaccines together only number 20 million.

    Dr. Geier explains that flu is “the wrong thing to vaccinate against” because you have to keep re-vaccinating against it every year, unlike childhood infectious diseases, such as smallpox, that are only vaccinated for once.

    Learn How to Boost Your Natural Immunity

    Immune Boosting Herbs

    Fire Cider Tonic

    Ginger Teas

    Vitamin C

    Sources:

    https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0622-laiv-flu.html

    Something to think about and consider when (not if) flu epidemics begin to rise in our country this year. Who is really responsible for the “outbreaks?” 

    Shedding: Vaccine Insert 12.2 Pharmacodynamics Shedding Studies
    Shedding of vaccine viruses within 28 days of vaccination with FluMist was evaluated in (1) multi-center 
    study MI-CP129 which enrolled healthy individuals 6 through 59 months of age (N = 200); and (2) multi-
    center study FM026 which enrolled healthy individuals 5 through 49 years of age (N = 344). In each study, 
    nasal secretions were obtained daily for the first 7 days and every other day through either Day 25 and on 
    Day 28 or through Day 28. In study MI-CP129, individuals with a positive shedding sample at Day 25 or 
    Day 28 were to have additional shedding samples collected every 7 days until culture negative on 
    2 consecutive samples. Results of these studies are presented in Table 5.

    Return of FluMist: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2018/02/cdc-vaccine-panel-brings-back-flumist-2018-19-season

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/01/17/1716561115

    https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090519172045.htm

  • Safe Alternative to Toxic Fabric Softner

    Today, almost everyone in America adds a chemical fabric softener to their laundry routine, pouring a capful into the washer or tossing a sheet in the dryer. Fabric softener ads often portray an image of comfort, freshness and sweetness. Yet most fabric softeners contain a grim list of known toxins which can enter your body through the skin and by inhalation, causing a wide range of health problems, particularly for young children. Manufacturers are aware that the products contain toxic chemicals. The packaging on many brands include a warning that the product should not be used on children’s sleepwear. Since some of the same brands also have large images of children and toys, however, consumers may miss the small print message.

    What is fabric softener? 

    It is a combination of chemicals that coat the surface of textiles with a thin layer of lubrication. This makes the clothes feel smoother and helps them to resist the buildup of static electricity. Early fabric softeners were made from a combination of soap and olive oil or other natural oils.

    However, today’s fabric softeners are made of noxious chemicals combined with a massive amount of fragrance that masks their nose-curling odors. Fabric softener actually makes material less absorbent, which is not a good thing for your bath towels anyway.

    Here is a list of just SOME of the toxic chemicals found in commercial fabric softeners:

    • Alpha Terpineol: can cause central nervous damage and respiratory problems
    • Camphor: causes central nervous disorders, is easily absorbed through skin
    • Chloroform: a carcinogenic neurotoxin preferred by Ted Bundy
    • Benzyl Acetate: linked to pancreatic cancer
    • Benyl Alcohol: respiratory tract irritant
    • Ethanol: on the EPA’s “hazardous waste” list, can cause central nervous system disorders
    • Ethyl Acetate: a narcotic on the EPA’s “hazardous waste” list
    • Limonene: a known carcinogen that irritates eyes and skin
    • Linalool: causes central nervous system disorders and depresses heart activity

    Safer Alternatives.

    Buy a $5 set of dryer balls, switch to a soy-based softener, or add a quarter-cup of baking soda or vinegar to your wash cycle and you will never have to use chemical fabric softener again.

    Vinegar is cheap and nontoxic. It naturally removes soap residue, and helps with static reduction during drying. Vinegar contains small amounts of sodium and  potassium, which help soften hard water. Homemade fabric softener ingredients are combined with water to make a solution you can store in a container and use each time you do the wash.

    Making your own fabric softener is very easy and cost effective.

    Natural  Homemade Fabric Softener Ingredients

    Mix ingredients together and pour into a storage container.

    To use:

    Dilute the vinegar mixture  with water before being used in your laundry.  For regular sizes loads, mix 1/4 cup of vinegar mixture with 3/4 cups of water. Pour the fabric softener into your washer during the final rinse cycle.

    If you feel the need to purchase fabric softener check out EWG’s list of toxin products.
    Attitude can be purchased online from AMAZON