Tag: ineffective

Kids Vaccinated with Flu Mist Are Spreading Disease

After seeing a 2% drop in vaccine sales for flu, the ACIP panel brought back the ineffective FluMist live virus multi-strand flu vaccines. It was so ineffective last time it was pulled mid season because it hardly worked. This time doctors won’t know for sure if it works better than before — or better than other vaccine options — until it’s widely used again during an actual flu season. They just want your family to participate in their experiment. More astonishing is they are aware that this vaccine has the innate ability to expose EVERYONE around the vaccinated individual with multiple strains of the flu for almost month. Why would the agency designed to ‘control disease’ the CDC and manufacturers, whose products protect us from disease, intentionally putting children at day cares, schools and teams at greatest risk for flu ‘outbreaks’ this year?

Just like a dog or cat sheds hair, the human body gives off, or “sheds,” flu virus when infected. FluMist contains weakened, but live flu strains that infect the body enough to provoke a response from the immune system, but aren’t meant to make a person sick.The manufacturer argued that more viral shedding suggested that the virus was activating the immune system -WebMD

What does SHEDDING mean?

It means capable of spreading the multiple strains of flu to all the other children in daycare, students in the classroom, children on the team, teachers, coaches, grandparents…you get the idea. So according to SCIENTIFIC evaluations of the vaccines performed by the manufacturers the vaccinated children are putting EVERYONE at risk exposing them to multiple strains of the flu after being vaccinated with the multiple strand flu mist vaccine.

Manufactured Flu Season?

While you are getting the needle free flu midst for your child to protect them you will instead be exposing those around your child with multiple strains of the flu for up to 69 days according to studies. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission –http://ow.ly/z75m300DfJg

The most recent research from the National Academy of Sciences proves that people who are vaccinated spread the virus more, are not protected, and prior vaccination is harming people’s immunity!

Does the flu vaccine protect you or those around you?

Well according to the research, the opposite would be true. The findings of the study found that those individuals who had received the flu vaccine were “shedding” 6.3 times more virus than the unvaccinated!
Straight from the research:

“Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

“The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”

Plain Language.

Higher viral shedding means that those who were vaccinated were breathing out more influenza virus and would be spreading it more than the unvaccinated. So when doctors, health departments, or health “authorities” like the CDC push the vaccine by saying things like “the vaccine protects you and those around you,” “everyone needs the vaccine because of ‘herd’ immunity,” or “you have to get the vaccine so you protect the very young, the elderly and the very weak/cancer patients etc.,” they would actually be lying.

6.3 times more aerosol shedding means that those who were vaccinated were spreading more virus into the air around them just by breathing when compared to those who had not received the vaccine that same year and/or the flu vaccine from the previous year.

The implications of this finding now show that those who are vaccinated pose a greater risk to the immune compromised, i.e. cancer patients, the elderly and the very young and that the unvaccinated spread the disease less and protect others better!

In essence, the vaccine does the exact opposite of what people have been told and explains why we are seeing more and more people get sick earlier each year and more people die from the flu.

Reduced protection with annual vaccination, means that the flu vaccine weakens a person immunity against infectious illness. This fact has been shown in multiple studies on children and confirmed with animal studies. One such study deserving of “honorable mention” is this study: Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: A case-control study which found that children receiving the annual flu vaccine had a “threefold increased risk of hospitalization.”

<Read more https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/ >

https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20180222/flumist-may-be-coming-back

September 4, 2018
The Ill Fated Flu Shot
C

The Flu Shot is:

NOT EFFECTIVE 98.5% of adults will get the flu even after the shot

NOT TESTED FOR SAFETY you can’t do a long term test on something that changes annually

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PREGNANT WOMEN manufacture’s insert advise caution

NOT TESTED for potential to cause CANCER or INFERTILITY

NOT TESTED FOR SAFE use on children

NOT MERCURY FREE

DC RECOMMENDED FLU SHOT OR NOT

THE FLU SHOT IS NOT EFFECTIVE

CDC numbers reflect its quite the opposite

Actual data provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) shows that flu shot has ALWAYS been found to be remarkable ineffective. The number of people studied to determine this result exceeded 9000. When you look at the CDC’s table you’ll get a sense that it’s a ‘shot in the dark’ and more than half the people choosing to get the shot derived no benefit whatsoever.

You would probably think that, since the CDC states the annual flu vaccine is the “best” way to avoid catching the seasonal flu, that it has been proven to be effective. Review the chartm using CDC’s OWN NUMBERS the flu shot has NEVER been very effective.
In fact, it is hard to find ANY valid scientific evidence to support flu vaccine effectiveness or safety — and this is particularly true for key target groups for which the CDC says the flu shot is most important, like seniors, children and pregnant women!

One Flu VACCINE INSERT READS CLEARLY :
“There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval.”

THE FLU SHOT IS NOT TESTED FOR LONG TERM SAFETY

It’s IMPOSSIBLE to test the flu Vaccine as it changes annually

All Influenza Vaccines Clearly State:
“This vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” – see section 13.1 in all manufacturers inserts listed on left

THE FLU SHOT IS NOT TESTED FOR SAFETY IN PREGNANCY

ALL Flu Vaccine manufacture’s package insert warnings which read as follows:
“no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. …this vaccine should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed”
section 8.1 in the following influenza vaccine inserts listed on the left

Pregnant mother and her unborn child become part of the HUMAN EXPERIMENT with the FluLaval Quadrivalent vaccine.
*When you get a FluLaval Quadrivalent vaccine you and your unborn child become part of the experiment. Rather than complete safety research in advance, GlaxoSmithKline maintains a surveillance registry to collect data on pregnancy outcomes and newborn health status outcomes following vaccination with FLULAVAL QUADRIVALENT during pregnancy. (See Page 12 of the Manufacture Insert)
4250% INCREASE in FETAL DEATH REPORTED after flu shot

The CDC deliberately misled the nation’s obstetricians and gynecology regarding the flu shot for pregnant women.

If you’re pregnant, beware of doctors using aggressive fear tactics pushing you to get vaccinated. Here’s why…On September 27, 2012, the Human and Environmental Toxicology Journal (HET) published a study by Dr. Gary Goldman reporting a 4,250 percent increase in the number of miscarriages and stillbirths reported to VAERS in the 2009/2010 flu season. That year the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) had recommended the double-dosing pregnant mothers with two flu shots spiked with mercury. In his abstract, Goldman said:“The aim of this study was to compare the number of inactivated-influenza vaccine–related spontaneous abortion and stillbirth (SB) reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database during three consecutive flu seasons beginning 2008/2009 and assess the relative fetal death reports associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season.” [source:http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death/

THE FLU SHOT IS NOT TESTED FOR SAFETY IN CHILDREN

Despite what your health practitioner will say as they attempt to convince you to get the flu vaccine, the shot has not been evaluated for cancer risks, safety in pregnant women, or safety in various age range categories for children.
Vaccine package insert warnings which read as follows:

Flubok: “Safety and effectiveness in children 3 years to less than 18 years of age have not been established.”

Flucelvax: “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in children less than 18 years of age.”

Fluzone: “Safety and effectiveness in children below the age of 6 months have not been established.”

Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”

FluLaval: “Safety and effectiveness in children younger than 3 years have not been established.”

Afluria: “…not approved for use in children less than 5 years of age.”

Fluarix: “…not approved for use in children younger than 3 years.”

Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”

FLU VACCINE IS NOT JUST A DEAD VIRUS IN STERILE SOLUTION

It’s an injection of immune debilitating toxins and allergens

READ THE LABEL!
Influenza vaccines contain three or four influenza virus strains and are produced using either chicken eggs or genetically-engineered dog kidney. Vaccine ingredients may include: formaldehyde, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, non-human protein and genetic materials, polysorbate 80, Thimerosal, MSG (monosodium glutamate), all of which are considered poisonous to humans.

FLU VACCINE IS NOT Mercury-Free

THIMEROSAL/MERCURY
The Influenza Vaccine clearly shows the vaccine contains Thimerosal a neurotoxin. Thimerosal, which is approximately 50% mercury by weight, has been one of the most widely used preservatives in vaccines.
Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million.
50,000 ppb Mercury = Current “preservative” level mercury in multi-dose flu (94% of supply).
SOURCE: *Mercury in Vaccines

WHAT EFFECTIVE DOES MECURY HAVE ON YOUR BODY?
0.5 parts per billion (ppb) mercury = Kills human neuroblastoma cells
(Parran et al., Toxicol Sci 2005; 86: 132-140).
2 ppb mercury = U.S. EPA limit for drinking water http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html#mcls
20 ppb mercury = Neurite membrane structure destroyed (Leong et al., Neuroreport 2001; 12: 733-37).
200 ppb mercury = level in liquid the EPA classifies as hazardous waste. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/mercury/regs.htm...
25,000 ppb mercury = Concentration of mercury in the Hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth in the U.S., from 1990-2001.
50,000 ppb Mercury = Concentration of mercury in multi-dose DTaP and Haemophilus B vaccine vials, administered 4 times each in the 1990’s to children at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months of age.
Current “preservative” level mercury in multi-dose flu (94% of supply), meningococcal and tetanus (7 and older) vaccines.
By injecting mercury instead of ingesting it, you are essentially by-passing your inner filtration systems. All of the mercury in a vaccine enters the blood stream, which leads straight to the brain. Remember that toxic amounts of mercury is considered anything over 200 ppb, and the amount of mercury in a “thimerosal-free” flu vaccine is 300 to 600 ppb – the vaccine most commonly used contains 50,000 ppb. When you ingest mercury, the amount that reaches your blood stream is much less than the actual amount you consumed. When you vaccinate, the entire amount of mercury reaches your blood stream.

THE FLU SHOT NOT SAFE.
IT IS THE MOST DANGEROUS VACCINE.

VAERS reporting reflects FLU VACCINE caused the most damage

As of April 2016, 126,884 adverse reactions/events were reported for the flu shot to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System and it has the been the most compensated for vaccine injury. Vaccine manufacturer’s and providers administering vaccinations are exempt from lawsuit in the case of injury or death. Possible reactions include: Paralysis, severe allergic reaction,vomiting, chronic exhaustion, facial palsy, blood and lymphatic system disorders,convulsions and more.

DOJ Quarterly Vaccine Injury Compensation Information

Department of Justice numbers reported regarding quarterly vaccine injury information reveals that the flu shot remains the most dangerous vaccine based on injuries and death compensated by the U.S. Government.
The estimated 1,000 claims that the VICP anticipates being filed in 2016 are projected to cost $224 million. Although the VICP was originally created by Congress to shield drug companies producing government licensed, recommended and mandated vaccines for children, today it is not children but adults injured by influenza vaccine who are receiving most of the compensation.
The majority of compensated flu shot injury claims are for nerve inflammation diagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disorder that attacks the nervous system and can result in life-long paralysis. Other complications include fibromyalgia, transverse myelitis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and death.
– See more at: http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/flu-vaccine-injury-and-death-claims-increase-in-2016/#sthash.JxwOFdJZ.Wkd8XjMT.dpuf

Vaccine Injuries are Seldom Reported
The U.S. Government keeps a database of reports documenting vaccine injuries and deaths called The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The problem is that very few medical officials ever report vaccine injuries or deaths, either because they are not trained to recognized them, or due to pressure within their profession to not report them. To admit that vaccines do cause harm is professional suicide for most doctors and medical professionals.
Hence, the quarterly DOJ report on vaccine cases only represents a tiny fraction of the actual cases that exist.
One place we can get a glimpse of the amount of vaccine harm that is being caused in the U.S. today is to look at emergency room visits. As one can see in the report above, with most of the settlements being cases of harm caused by the flu vaccine, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is the most common injury suffered from the flu shot. GBS is a debilitating disease that attacks a person’s own immune system and damages their nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis. It is very similar to the symptoms one may see with polio.
If you are taken to the emergency room with signs of GBS during flu season, chances are one of the first questions the doctors will ask you is if you have received the flu shot recently. GBS is also listed as a side effect of the flu shot in the package insert.
– See more at: http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/government-continues-to-pay-damages-for-injuries-and-deaths-due-to-the-flu-vaccine-in-vaccine-court/#sthash.OOOM6ZRj.dpuf

Preparing Yourself for the Flu Season Naturally Naturopathic prevention and treatment of the flu virus includes vitamins and minerals, botanical medicine and lifestyle recommendations.
Natural Treatment for Cold, Flu, and Illness Once you or your child has contracted an illness, there are a lot of natural options that can shorten the duration of the illness and lessen the symptoms
5 Best Ways to Prevent the Flu WITHOUT the Shot
READ IT FOR YOURSELF
Manufacture Package Inserts – Influenza
Afluria Package Insert (injectable)
bioCSL Inc.

FluLaval Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
GlaxoSmilthKline

Fluad Package Insert
Novartis (Seqirus)

FluMist Quadrivalent Package Insert (intranasal)
MedImmune, Inc.

Fluarix Package Insert (injectable)
GlaxoSmithKline

Fluvirin Package Insert (injectable)
Novartis (Seqirus) Vaccines

Fluarix Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
GlaxoSmithKline

Fluzone Package Insert (injectable)
Sanofi Pasteur

Flublok Package Insert (injectable)
Protein Sciences Corporation

Fluzone High-Dose Package Insert (injectable)
Sanofi Pasteur

Flucelvax Package Insert (injectable)
Novartis

Fluzone Intradermal Package Insert
Sanofi Pasteur

FluLaval Package Insert (injectable)
GlaxoSmithKline

Fluzone Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
Sanofi Pasteur
March 10, 2017
MUMPS VACCINE doesn’t work

HFI: The Mumps vaccine created by Merck doesn’t work. Merck is in the middle of a lawsuit that claims scientist were forced to FAKE the effectiveness of the vaccine.

According to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:

• Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.”

• In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune system antibodies. As reported in CourthouseNews.com:

Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that “did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life … virus neutralization in vaccinated people,” according to the complaint. (http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm)

Mumps outbreaks from 2015 to present reflect that more than 80% of the individuals in the US contracting mumps had both ‘recommended doses’ of the MMR vaccine. Defying COMMON SENSE, health departments are considering recommending a THIRD DOSE of the ineffective vaccine.
This begs the question, WHO BENEFITS from the additional shot of vaccine that doesn’t work?

Excerpt from the Washington Post Article:

Federal health officials are evaluating the benefit of an additional dose of the mumps vaccine because of the increasing number of mumps outbreaks since 2006. More than 5,000 cases of the contagious viral illness were reported last year in the United States, the most in a decade.

Among the outbreaks in recent years, 19 occurred last year on college campuses. Arkansas has been battling an outbreak that began in one community last summer and has since infected 2,815 people, the largest recorded in that state.

The mumps outbreaks have been occurring in communities with high rates of immunization and residents who often have received both recommended doses of the vaccine.

Federal officials said Thursday that they are looking into whether mumps immunity decreases over time and whether there would be benefits to a third dose. State and local health authorities are particularly interested in that additional shot as a preventive measure, Mona Marin told the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

“Although the disease has not been serious, the disruption and expense it has caused for local and state health officials has been significant,” said Marin, a viral diseases expert with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Currently, the CDC recommends that children receive two doses of the MMR vaccine — for measles, mumps and rubella — with the first dose at 12 to 15 months of age and the second at 4 to 6 years.

This article originally appeared at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/02/23/rise-in-mumps-outbreaks-prompts-u-s-officials-to-weigh-third-vaccine-dose/?postshare=231487970043297&tid=ss_fb&utm_term=.1e7f786e4b40.

February 24, 2017