Tag: lying

  • Lack of Disclosure by Schools is Coercion

    ALL THREE VACCINE EXEMPTIONS EXIST IN IDAHO! If you received enrollment paperwork for your child stating that vaccines are required – without disclosing there is exemptions – you are being lied to!

    We expect our schools to teach our children knowledge of reading and writing. We expect the campus to be free from bullying. We expect the schools to enforce the community standards of respect and telling the truth. And yet, when parents enroll their children into school these standards are ignored by administration and staff.

    Parents are lied to by omission which is lying. They are bullied and harassed. The full disclosure of the law is ignored.

    Citizens brought forth a bill that would require the health department and school administration to provide full disclosure of the law. This bill passed the House with a vote of 52 to 17. Yes, 17 representatives believed that coercion at the hands of the health department and schools is acceptable. )

    VOTE AGAINST NOTIFYING PARENTS– Berch, Chew, Davis, Erpelding, Gannon, Green(18), Kauffman, Kerby, Mason, McCrostie, Raybould, Rubel, Smith, Toone, Wagoner, Wintrow, Wood

    However, due to the structure of our legislature ONE MAN stopped this bill from being heard in the Senate. The power of the Chairman of the Health Committee used his personal opinion in favor of vaccines to keep this informed consent bill from being put to a vote. Senator Fred Martin believes the outright lies of the marketing campaigns via the health department and the school’s administrative policies is appropriate. 

    One mom writes: 

    I was registering my son for kindergarten today (his only partial year of public school before he will be homeschooled). I noticed this passage and the way it was worded when I was filling out his registration paperwork. I came with his vaccine exemption form in hand already filled out, which they accepted. I was really bothered by the fact that we have the right to waive vaccines, and yet they write to parents that by law they have to have their vaccinations. This is wrong. They should say something like, “It is Idaho State Law that you must have complete immunization records or an Idaho School Immunization Exemption Form to register your child for school.”

    I listened to moms coming in worried that they didn’t have vaccination records and the school never gave them the option to waive. 

    If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?

     – Concerned Mom

    Dear Senators and Representatives – If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?

    A hearing last year to require school to give complete information on the law that includes vaccine exemptions for medical, religious and other reasons Senators advised that parents should try to inform one another. The vote against a measure of informed consent allows the school’s are allowed to deceive, lie, and bully parents by failing to inform parents of their full rights under Idaho statue. 

    The CITIZENS want schools to tell the truth, full disclosure. NO MORE BULLYING! This is outright coercing parents with inadequate information on the actual state statute. It should NOT be the responsibility of the citizen to inform one another of the schools deceiptful tatics. It should be the responsibility of the tax supported schools and state Health departments to be accountable to the LAW. 

    Why? Because school officials have said, their goal is increased vaccination rates. Our schools rank at the bottom of education for the United States. Our school system is failing our children. The focus of the school should be to improve knowledge, reading and math and sciences. They should NOT be involved in the medical affairs of families. These decisions should be left between doctor and parent and not be coerced by school officials. 

  • School’s Lack of Disclosure is Coercion

    We expect our schools to teach our children knowledge of reading and writing. We expect the campus to be free from bullying. We expect the schools to enforce the community standards of respect and telling the truth. And yet, when parents enroll their children into school these standards are ignored by administration and staff. Parents are lied to by omission which is lying. They are bullied and harassed. The full disclosure of the law is ignored. Citizens brought forth a bill that would require the health department and school administration to provide full disclosure of the law. This bill passed the House with a vote of 52 to 17. Yes, 17 representatives believed that coercion at the hands of the health department and schools is acceptable. ) However, due to the structure of our legislature ONE MAN stopped this bill from being heard in the Senate. The power of the Chairman of the Health Committee used his personal opinion in favor of vaccines to keep this informed consent bill from being put to a vote. Senator Fred Martin believes the out right lies of the marketing campaigns via the health department and the school’s administrative policies is appropriate. 

    One mom writes: 

    I was registering my son for kindergarten today (his only partial year of public school before he will be homeschooled). I noticed this passage and the way it was worded when I was filling out his registration paperwork. I came with his vaccine exemption form in hand already filled out, which they accepted. I was really bothered by the fact that we have the right to waive vaccines, and yet they write to parents that by law they have to have their vaccinations. This is wrong. They should say something like, “It is Idaho State Law that you must have complete immunization records or an Idaho School Immunization Exemption Form to register your child for school.”

    I listened to moms coming in worried that they didn’t have vaccination records and the school never gave them the option to waive. 

    If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?

     – Concerned Mom

    Dear Senators and Representatives – If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?

    A hearing last year to require school to give complete information on the law that includes vaccine exemptions for medical, religious and other reasons Senators advised that parents should try to inform one another. The vote against a measure of informed consent allows the school’s are allowed to deceive, lie, and bully parents by failing to inform parents of their full rights under Idaho statue. 

    The CITIZENS want schools to tell the truth, full disclosure. NO MORE BULLYING! This is outright coercing parents with inadequate information on the actual state statute. It should NOT be the responsibility of the citizen to inform one another of the schools deceiptful tatics. It should be the responsibility of the tax supported schools and state Health departments to be accountable to the LAW. 

    Why? Because school officials have said, their goal is increased vaccination rates. Our schools rank at the bottom of education for the United States. Our school system is failing our children. The focus of the school should be to improve knowledge, reading and math and sciences. They should NOT be involved in the medical affairs of families. These decisions should be left between doctor and parent and not be coerced by school officials. 

    WHY WOULD OUR POLITICIANS VOTE AGAINST CITIZENS INFORMED CONSENT? 

    HOUSE BILL 133 

    Amends existing law to require that complete information regarding immunization exemptions be given by daycare facilities and schools to parents or guardians enrolling children.

    Those who voted against the citizen include: 

    Berch, Chew, Davis, Erpelding, Gannon, Green(18), Kauffman, Kerby, Mason, McCrostie, Raybould, Rubel, Smith, Toone, Wagoner, Wintrow, Wood

    Invoking your Vaccine Exemption

    Parents have the right to vaccine exemption with a signed statement from parents. (PRINTABLE COPY) 

     To Whom It May Concern:

    Persuant to Idaho Code 39-4802(2) (Title 39, Chapter 48, Section 2, Number 2) and The Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164, I object to the vaccine reporting requirements and invoke my right to be exempt from the provisions of 39-4801 Idaho Code for personal and family reasons and ‘other grounds’ in regard to and on behalf of my minor child, (Child’s First and Last Name).

    This statement supersedes any and all previous forms or statements made in regard to this matter.

    ___________________________________
    (Parent First and Last Name)
    Parent /Guardian /Custodian

    Idaho Code 39-4802(2):
    Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.


    SCHOOLS BULLY PARENTS! This is NOT a isolated incident. Please see coercive material given to parents across the state.

    It’s another example of lying by omission. In fact it’s just lying. “No child shall attend school without proof of immunization status” is a lie. They are funded with public money, State law applies to them. 

    In an enrollment package for a Charter School

    At the bottom of a report card in Payette

    At an enrollment fair where they had a SHOT CLINIC…but when asked where the exemption forms were located – parents are required to talk with a nurse before having access to one. 

  • Vaccine Fraud Putting Our Children at Risk

    Drug companies creating U.S. vaccines are GUILTY of fraud. Why is it when these companies say vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ – we still believe them? Our due diligence as parents should be to question those whose lies benefit their pocketbooks by billions of dollars and listen to the parents whose warning comes from a place of research, loss and lacks financial gain. Marcella Piper-Terry summarized the vaccine manufacturers fraud and trickery in this recent post. 

    • Merck. The company that manufactures the MMR. They are being sued in federal court over falsifying the efficacy data on their mumps vaccine. 
    • The CDC whistleblower says he falsified data on their MMR/Autism study. 
    • Merck. The company that manufactures Gardasil. It is the most compensated vaccine for injury behind the flu vaccine.
    • Merck. The company who manufactured Vioxx before it was pulled off the market due to its heart attack and stroke risks, which they denied.
    • Merck. The company who also manufactures Fosamax, Januvia, and Propecia, all which faced lawsuits due to their side effects.
    • Merck. The company named in 4 lawsuits between 2007 and 2016 for all manner of questionable business practices.
    • Merck. The company who also manufactures vaccines for chickenpox, shingles, pneumonia, Hep B, Hep A, Rotavirus, and Hib.

    “As the largest single purchaser of childhood vaccines (accounting for more than 50 percent of all vaccine purchases), the United States is by far the largest financial victim of Merck’s fraud,” according to the 2010 False Claims Act complaint.

    Listen to this medical doctor’s concern over the flu vaccine

    He says: “Dr. Geier points out how ridiculous it is spend billions of dollars on a vaccine that might, at its best, save about 50 lives a year, when there are far more serious problems causing death that are more worthy of that kind of expenditure.”

    Should we be concerned? Every US Manufacturer/supplies of pediatric vaccines has pled GUILTY to fraud within the last 5 years.

    * Merck Accused of Fraud, Deceit and Negligence in US Gardasil Case

    * Read more: Merck Accused of Fast Tracking a Vaccine for Financial Gain

    PRINTABLE FRAUD FINDINGS for Each Vaccine Manufacturer
    US Vaccine Manufacturers as listed by the CDC

    MERCK: 

    “Merck has been involved in a long federal lawsuit with allegations of fraud over the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine, in a case filed back in 2010 by two whistleblowers, virologists who worked for Merck. Merck has apparently tried hard to get this case thrown out of court, and keep this news out of the media, but late in 2014 a federal judge finally ruled that the case is to move forward.” more , United States of America vs. Merck (2:10-CV-04374-CDJ) is a current case in which former virologists, now whistleblowers, allege Merck falsified data with regards to the efficacy of the MMRII vaccine. Original Court Documents: 

    Pennsylvania Eastern District Court, Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ

    District Judge C. DARNELL JONES, II, presiding

    GlaxoSmithKline 

    Dept of Justice Press Release: GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data : Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History <source document>

    Sanofi

    FBI Reports:Sanofi U.S. Agrees to Pay $109 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations of Free Product Kickbacks to Physicians 

    US Senate Committee on Finance Reports: 

    *Fraud in Clinical Trial of drug

    * Sanofi Accused Of Fraud In Clinical Trial Of Drug

    *FBI reports: Two Former Pharmaceutical/Medical Technology Executives Sentenced for Their Roles in Insider Trading Scheme 

    Sanofi-Aventis US LLC is facing a consumer fraud class action lawsuit kickbacks and over billingNY Times reports:

    MEDIA REPORTS

    Wall Street Journal: Did Merck Unfairly Monopolize the Market for a Mumps Vaccine?

    “The ultimate victims here are the millions of children who, every year, are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection,” the lawsuit filed by the virologists states. And while federal health officials have said the disease was supposed to have been eradicated by now, “the failure of Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.” Meanwhile, the mumps vaccine was ringing the register at Merck, which reported that sales reached $621 million last year, when including both the MMR II vaccine – which is mumps, measles and rubella – and the ProQuad vaccine, a combination product that is also used to thwart chickenpox, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.

    Merck Created Hit List to “Destroy,” “Neutralize” or “Discredit” Dissenting Doctors

    USAToday Drugmakers Health Fines

    How much damage is caused..4 Billion and counting