Tag: marketing

  • Measles Vaccine: CDC erases evidence of abortion-tainted ingredients

    The CDC is removing listed excipients of vaccines from their official list that is made available to the public. Parents who have concerns about abortion tainted vaccines will find it harder to make an informed decision. The CDC recently removed and reworded the vaccine excipients list on their website.

    Has Merck suddenly re-formulated their vaccine this past year after decades of using WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts (aka aborted fetal cells) for the development and manufacture of the MMR (measles vaccine)?

    MMR Vaccine inserts straight from Merck’s website:
    https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf

    No.

    The CDC is trying to silently erase the evidence. It appears to be done as a marketing ploy removing controversial contents, removing words and changing around ingredients to make them seem less of a moral violation.
    This should be criminal.

    Erasing evidence…

    <<< What is WI-38? https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CCL-75.aspx#characteristics >>>

    Why don’t they want the public to know that this ingredient is used in the manufacturing process of the MMR vaccine? This appears to be an intentional ploy to confuse consumers.

    Confusing consumers…

    The CDC renamed the controversial ingredients from their printed list in January 2019. Human diploid is just a description of what the MRC-5 cell is. They are still harvested from healthy aborted human beings.

    previous excipient list

    Could it be, because they want to mandate vaccines and take away religious exemptions?

    Are We Really Injecting Our Children with DNA of Aborted Human Beings?

    The ‘grandfather’ of vaccines recently stated under oath that almost a hundred (or more) aborted human beings were used in the research and development of vaccines.

    These preborn humans were healthy and their bodies used as spare parts. Portions of their DNA still remain in the vaccines injected into our children numerous times in their childhood.

    Fetal DNA & TOXIC CONTAMINANTS are found in the final product of vaccines tested by independent labs

    CORVELVA: ‘MRC-5 contained in Priorix Tetra – Complete genome sequencing’

    Corvelva.it
    The human fetal DNA presented in this vaccine is a single entire genome, which means the vaccine contains genomic DNA with all the chromosomes of a male individual (in fact MRC-5 originates from a male fetus).

    Given below are the analysis results of different types of variants compared to the reference human genome.

    Read the full report at CORVELVA. Full Report was useful, especially page 9 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CORVELVA-MRC-5-contained-in-Priorix-Tetra-Complete-genome-sequencing.pdf

    Why don’t they want the public to know that this ingredient is used in the manufacturing process of the MMR vaccine?

    Could it be, because they want to mandate vaccines and take away religious exemptions?

    Because if people see that the MMR is manufactured with cells from an aborted fetus, that people might take issue with this?

    Because they keep saying, that there is NO RELIGIOUS REASON to not vaccinate your child?

    What about the parents who don’t want to inject their child with a vaccine that was manufactured using tissue from an aborted fetus?

    What about the parents who don’t want to inject their child with biologically active DNA fragments from those aborted fetuses?

    THEY. DON’T. WANT. YOU. TO KNOW.

  • Is the Hotspot Vaccine Exemptions Campaign A Fear Mongering Set Up For Vaccine Mandates?

    Do you believe that parents should make the health decisions for their own children? If so, you aren’t alone. The numbers of parents opting out of some or all vaccines appear to be increasing based on the nationwide tracking of our children’s vaccine status as they enter kindergarten. That’s right, your child’s vaccination status is being tracked. 

    In Idaho, your family is AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED into the tri-state tracking system by health care providers, child care providers, and school officials. While you can ask for your information to be removed from the Health and Welfare tracking system, it can and will, register it back in at any time by authorized users (doctor, schools, daycare). In other words, if you don’t submit your request to the schools, doctors, daycare providers that you wish to have your private medical information REMAIN PRIVATE and never entered into the system, they will assume that you want to be tracked.

    Your children’s medical information is likely in the database RIGHT NOW. You must request that your child’s medical information removed from the IRIS database.

    ACTION ITEM >>> REQUEST YOUR CHILD’S MEDICAL INFORMATION PURGED FROM TRI-STATE TRACKING SYSTEM KNOWN AS IRIS.

    However, once your information is shared within the government tracking database, authorized 3rd parties can take the information and use it as they wish. (Notice the newest marketing material labeling Idaho’s vaccine exemptions as a hot spot. Or the Idaho vaccination rate map available online.) While you can opt out of IRIS and purge your child’s information from their IRIS system, you are unable to purge it from the third party systems once it has been accessed.

    Tracking your child’s vaccine status harmless? Think again.

    Tracking childhood vaccinations has nothing to do with local health, it’s all about marketing. They are using your child’s private medical information to drive their sales and increase their profit. When you allow your child’s vaccination exemption status to be tracked you are participating in the marketing campaign designed to target your family as ‘public health enemy’ number one.

    If you choose to opt out of even one vaccine, your family is presented as a public enemy.  Look at these headlines! These are obvious marketing campaigns intended to sway public opinion.  Their marketing ploy is to create division in the public against those who don’t comply with the 78 CDC recommended vaccinations.

    Of course, the obvious question for the fear mongers is: If vaccines are effective, why are they worried about other people’s vaccination status?

    Why are parents opting out?

    With the rise in the number of kindergartners who enter school without ALL their shots, the marketing piece serves as a “wake-up call” to the parents blindly following doctor’s orders and the CDC recommendations. Really this question should be why are so many families opting out if vaccines are really ‘safe and effective’? 

    Parents have been empowered with information and truth. Reading vaccine inserts, reviewing ingredient lists and looking at scientific journals that accessible to the public. They are realizing that there are a lack of scientific studies for safety and effectiveness of vaccines. They are waking up to the truth that vaccines permanently damage, injure and cause death to children and adults. Families who suffered intense loss have NOTHING to gain by sharing their stories except the hope that their loss will prevent further destruction of the health and lives of other children.

    Vaccine Injury: If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct – only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then, upwards of 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported…

    Media wants your child to be labeled the source of all “outbreaks”.  It begs the question, “What about under-vaccinated adults?”

    The new “hot spots” study was authored by a vaccine industry insider (Dr. Peter Hotez) who is a patent holder of vaccines, and fails a really simple test: it never contemplates the vaccination status of any ADULTS in these hot spots, despite the fact that they represent 76% of the population, are known by the CDC to have low vaccination rates, and the fact that vaccines wane over time. Why is the media so credulous to these industry-sponsored scare pieces? Read More

    Fear mongering a set up for vaccine mandates?

    First create the problem, then present the solution. That is how marketing works right?

    First, they used the tracking of your child’s vaccine record to ‘create’ a threat. Their solution has already been declared – reduce vaccine exemptions and create vaccine mandates. Those who profit from their liability-free vaccines want mandates just as they have in California. Imagine the $$ signs dancing in front of their eyes – their product forced on every school child without any loss from damages or injury.  In 2014 the global vaccine market was worth over 32 billion dollars and was expected to reach over 59 billion by the year 2020.(Those damages are paid from the taxes added to each vaccine.)  

    Were you aware that drug companies donated millions to California lawmakers before vaccine debate and the Disneyland Outbreak of 2015? 

    Did you know that the vaccination status of California before mandated school vaccines was 97.46%?

    They are using FEAR to take away our FREEDOM

    What can be done?

    Step 1: Get your child’s information PURGED from their tracking system. Be vigilant to keep it out of their hands for marketing purpose.

    Step 2: Be aware that those 15 areas labeled as “hotspots” will also be targeted for vaccine mandates. Watch AND PARTICIPATE your local elections. Check on the elected officials funding! Expose those who are being influenced by pharmaceutical companies. Those individuals who actively and openly support health freedom – those are the people who need your support. It doesn’t matter if they are in your district or not! Theirs is another vote for freedom should bills be drafted restricting vaccine exemptions.

    What else do you think can be done to preserve health freedom and the right of parents to opt-out of toxic laden vaccinations?

  • Which diseases should you fear?

    What diseases do you FEAR your child might contract? Measles? Mumps? Leprosy? Wondering how many parents walk around daily concerned about their child contracting leprosy? It still exists- by the thousands in various parts of the world. The United States has roughly 200 new cases every year with over 6,500 cases of Hansen’s disease/Leprosy. Did you know that? I didn’t until I just looked it up. (See the source)

    Don’t you think it’s weird that there was hysteria over 31 measles cases (where no one died or was permanently harmed) and you hear exactly ZERO about 200 cases of leprosy and its long term health impact?  

    Everyone knows when there is a measles or mumps outbreak. It’s all over the local news. Healthy (yet unvaccinated) children are denied school. Parents are pushed to get ‘updated’ on vaccines.

    How do we not hear about these cases of leprosy? Why aren’t you walking around concerned about leprosy every day? Why aren’t you concerned about someone from another country bringing leprosy into the US and somehow exposing all of our most vulnerable to this illness?

    I’ll tell you why…You are afraid of what we vaccinate for because these illnesses are hyped up all of the time. It’s propaganda. You are told what to fear, so they can then sell you their product for profit.

    Measles and others is a concern for you – because you are told that it should be. But you don’t walk around fearing leprosy. Your children haven’t contracted it either.

    Funny how that all works, isn’t it?

    The only diseases we fear are the ones that a vaccine has been developed and marketed for. We never feared measles and mumps in the early 20th century… Because the media didn’t tell us to.

    Yes, there are vaccines for bacterial and viral diseases. Of course they are working on vaccines for hundreds of diseases that we are not yet afraid of because we haven’t been to do to so. 

    Did you know the newest vaccine requirement for Idaho is for a disease that affects 3 individuals in the state with a population of 1.6 million. A disease that is so exceedingly rare and already on a downward trend WITHOUT this extra vaccine requirement. It calls into question the motivation for the requirement. 

    Perhaps its because Idaho Legislators are Sold Out to Big Pharma?

    Learn More about the Meningitis Mandate

  • Medical Science OR Medical Marketing?

    Medical Science OR Medical Marketing?

    Do you still believe that “medical science” is independent of the industry it reports on?!! Leading vaccine-maker MERCK admits paying for the creation of a new medical journal in Australia to promote it’s products while appearing to be an independent journal. 

    Current Editor-in-Chief of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet commented on this last year by saying: “Much of scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue…Science has taken a turn towards darkness.” — Dr Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief of leading medical journal The Lancet.”

    But news of a Merck-sponsored publication for doctors in Australia, that has come to light in a personal injury lawsuit there over Vioxx, has raised eyebrows in international medical publishing.

    From 2002 through 2005, the Australian affiliate of Merck paid the Australian office of Elsevier, an academic publisher, to publish eight compilations of scientific articles under the title Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine, a spokesman for Elsevier said. The Merck marketing compilation was unusual in that it looked like an independent peer-reviewed medical journal. It even called itself a “journal,” without indicating in any of the issues that Merck had paid for it.

    Elsevier is not the only publishing house which has been accused of sometimes blurring the line between advertising and science. This problem is particularly pronounced in medicine, where there is much money to be made from sales of drugs and medical devices. Drug companies push to publish positive results, saysGiustini, who runs a popular wiki for health librarians, because it is an effective means of getting the attention of doctors, who prescribe drugs and recommend medical devices. So it shouldn’t come as a complete surprise, he says, that a drug company (Merck, in the case of the fake Australian journal) funded a marketing publication in a form that looked like a journal. “It’s troubling and shocking but not completely new.”

    The effects of polluting medical literature with poor or suspect science are significant, says Giustini. Doctors are too busy to carefully assess every article about a new drug or device, he says, yet must now take that time because they are wary of accepting in good faith the authors’ conclusions.

    “I believe that many doctors reviewing the journal would likely believe it to be a peer-reviewed medical journal, and rely upon the contents as they would upon other journals they read,” said Robert J. Donovan, an expert witness for the plaintiff, according to a deposition statement.

    Its not just Australia the British Medical Journal is also guilty.

    The British Medical Journal published several scathing editorials against Dr. Andrew Wakefield whose research figures pointed to a possible connection of gut damage in children and the administration of MMR vaccine in the 90’s. Hardly an independent view as the BMJ admits it receives funding from both Merck and GSK, the makers of the MMR vaccines. 

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734229/