Tag: protection

  • What does this mean for our 1st Amendment Rights in Idaho?

    Susan Lang was found guilty of disturbing the peace for protesting Covid lockdowns. What does this mean for our 1st Amendment rights? Miste Karlfeldt of Health Freedom Idaho interviews Susan and discusses the upcoming sentencing on August 17, 2021

  • Protecting Your Family from Wireless Radiation -EMFs

    September 2019, 5G went live in Boise, Idaho. Verison Wireless went around the public concern about health and installed emitters without public input. Families living in and around the city have expressed concerns about the impact of this untested technology on their families. EMFs effects are scientifically documented by independent labs worldwide. Wireless technology is engrained in our culture. In this modern age, it’s not unusual to see a 2-year-old operate a tablet with finesse.  Kids are asking for smartphones at younger and younger ages. But are they safe? What can we do to protect our most vulnerable? 

    EMF Safety Research

    The truth is, there is plenty of unbiased research on the health effects of EMFs.  You can find over 4,000 studies alone at Bioinitiative.org.  Additional studies can be found at the World Health Organization and the I.A.R.C. (International Agency for Cancer). Both the WHO and the I.A.R.C. have classified wireless radiation as a Group 2B carcinogen, indicating that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are possible human carcinogens.  For reference, this category also includes glyphosate, lead, gasoline, and engine exhaust. 

    EMF Exposure

    We are literally swimming in EMF soup daily thanks to the demand for “smart” everything. Besides cell phones and tablets we are getting exposed via modems, routers and router extenders, smart TVs, gaming devices, baby monitors, Bluetooth devices, and even robotic vacuums.  Not to mention cell towers and smart meters.  

    Studies have shown that anything over 30 microWatts per square meter (mWm²) has the potential to cause DNA damage. Anything over 1 milligauss on a Gauss meter is causing dirty electricity.  According to the science, safe levels for adult exposure to EMFs are a maximum of 30 mW/m2 and safe levels for a child are much lower at a maximum of 10 mW/m2.  Safe levels for children are much lower because their blood-brain barrier is still forming so they absorb twice the amount of EMFs than adults do.  

    Unfortunately, the devices listed above often show readings well over 2,000 mW/m2.  Now we need to ask ourselves…What are these frequencies doing to the body?

    Possible Health Effects

    Common health effects associated with EMF exposure include fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, depression, anxiety, headaches, immune system imbalances, cell damage (DNA and free radical damage), and evidence for Alzheimers and cancer risk. 

    Even scarier is that our future generations are at risk.  A woman’s eggs have 10 times the DNA damage compared to any other DNA in the body.  Our future grandchildren are in our wombs with our baby girls, making it even more important to be safe with wireless technology.  (Source: Dr. Berrie Trower, Physicist, UK Royal Navy)

    Simple Tips on Minimizing Exposure

    Before we discuss EMF protection, let’s talk about some of the simple ways you can be a smarter tech user: 

    1. Never hold the cell phone against your head.  Use a speakerphone or a wired headset to talk. Avoid wireless earbuds. 
    2. Use airplane mode as much as possible, especially if children are handling your device. 
    3. Avoid keeping your cell phone in your pocket or bra.
    4. Never let children play with a smartphone or tablet on their lap.
    5. Never sleep with a cell phone or tablet next to your bed.  

    EMF Protection

    What do you do if you can’t live without your device? What if your child uses a tablet at school? And what about those who are electrically sensitive that need to be able to survive in an increasingly wireless world?  That’s when personal and device protection comes in very handy.  

    Thankfully there are more and more options available to help us in the marketplace. How do we know what actually works? One great option is to use earth-based solutions to harmonize yourself and your wireless devices. 

    Products from EMF Harmony are tested extensively with live blood microscopy testing, mold testing, Acugraph testing, Avatar testing, Muscle testing/Applied kinesiology, and client testimonials to determine effectiveness. They are not designed to block EMFs, but rather harmonize them by using proprietary materials that filter the EMF and show a favorable body response when exposed to WiFi, A/C, powerlines, automobile EMFs, electrical appliances, cell phones, cell towers, and computers and laptops.   

    Clients report back better sleep, less brain fog, fewer headaches, and a sense of calm. 

    Thank you for EMF Harmony for authoring this post. If you have questions about EMF protection, contact Ryan directly at emfharmony.com

  • Court Says Child Welfare Agency Cannot Vaccinate Children In State Custody Without Parental Consent

    HFI Connecticut: Court Says Child Welfare Agency Cannot Vaccinate Children In State Custody Without Parental Consent. Texas too has a bill in place about keeping foster children from forced vaccinations.

    “Immunizations do not qualify as emergency care. No vaccine cures a disease,” Zedler said.

    His amendment was adopted in a 74-58 vote, something Wu said would set a “dangerous precedent.” Under current law, biological parents have the final say as to whether their child gets vaccinated. HB 39 tentatively passed the House in a 120-15 vote.

     This should be true in every single state! Parental Rights MUST BE PROTECTED! There are too many times that children are removed from their parents, placed in temporary custody and before any court decisions are made on behalf or against the parents. Children are force vaccinated against parents express wishes. 
     
    Connecticut Supreme Court Says Child Welfare Agency Cannot Vaccinate Children In State Custody Without Parental Consent

    The state Supreme Court ventured into the area of child inoculations Friday, ruling that the state cannot vaccinate neglected children placed in temporary state custody if the parents object.

    The court did not address the efficacy of vaccinations. Rather, the unanimous decision by seven justices turned narrowly on the definition of the words “medical care” in a state law authorizing the Department of Children and Families to look after the health needs of children committed to its custody.

    The department argued to the court that vaccinations fall within its authority to give medical care to children in its custody because vaccinations ”mitigate” against the possibility of contracting a disease. The justices, however, agreed with the parents, who argued that the common meaning meaning of “medical treatment” permits the state to administer emergency care without parental consent only for immediate health problems.

    “If there is no emergency, the state cannot intervene over the objection of parents,” said attorney Benjamin M. Wattenmaker, of the Hartford firm Feiner Wolfson, who represented the parents.

    The DCF said it was disappointed by the decision, and that it will seek to amend the law to allow it to vaccinate children, who can be in temporary custody for extended periods

    “We continue to believe in the wisdom of authorizing the Commissioner to vaccinate children in her care,” a department spokesman said in a prepared statement.

    The dispute arose after police in Rocky Hill were called in April 2016 to break up a fight between the unidentified parents of the children, then aged 1 and 2. The parents were arrested on disorderly conduct charges and the police learned that the family had been living in a van for months while traveling between Florida, North Carolina, Colorado, New York and Connecticut.

    A social worker described the children as filthy, covered with bruises and smelling of urine. The department took temporary custody of the children — they remain in temporary state care — and the mother authorized a medical evaluation, which showed no vaccinations.

    The parents said they objected, based on religious belief, to the department’s policy of routine vaccination for common childhood diseases. They moved in court to block vaccinations.

    A Superior Court judge ruled for the state and authorized vaccinations, but was reversed by the Supreme Court Friday.

    Wattenmaker said the children have not been vaccinated.

    Other News Articles about foster children forced vaccinated. Foster parents protecting children from vaccinations. 

    Seattle, Washington: http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/foster-parents-to-forgo-licenses-over-forced-flu-shots/

    This article originally appeared at: http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-supreme-court-vaccination-20170815-story.html.