Tag: risk

  • Tragic Adverse Reactions of COVID Vaccination in Children

    “I was the father of a 16-year-old son. 
    A single parent.
    I raised my boy since he was a baby. 
    He meant the world to me.
    We were always together. 
    He was my best friend.
    We got the Pfizer Vaccine because I thought it would protect him. 
    I thought it was the right thing to do. 
    My government lied to me. 
    They said it was safe, and now . . . 
    I go home to an empty house.
    He was my baby boy. 
    They need to stop pushing this on our children. 
    I lost mine. 
    You need to protect yours. 
    I love the hell out of my country, but I don’t trust my government anymore.” 
    — Ernest Ramirez
    Want to know more about vaccine reactions? On social media platforms type in this hashtag: #ProtectYourChildren #WeDid

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Oct. 15 it was delaying a decision on authorizing Moderna’s COVID vaccine for adolescents while the agency assesses whether the shot could increase the risk of myocarditis, a heart inflammatory condition, the Wall Street Journal reported.

    In June, the FDA added a warning to the literature accompanying Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID vaccines, to indicate an increased risk of myocarditis.

    However in May, a few weeks before the FDA added the warning, the agency authorized Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for ages 12 to 17, despite the known increased risk of myocarditis.

    It was also in June that Moderna filed for authorization in the U.S. of its vaccine for adolescents 12 through 17 years old.

    Pfizer adds an ingredient used to stabilize heart attack victims in vax for kids. Buried on Page 14 in the Pfizer paperwork with the FDA for the Covid vaccine for children is disturbing.

    Nov 02, 2021 · The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday approved Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5 to 11 years.

    Why would the FDA allow a vaccine with such high risk? It could be the manufacturer is influencing those individuals responsible for the approval with a portion of their $36 billion in profit for the liability-free vaccine. – concerned citizen

    3 More Reports of Teen Deaths After COVID Vaccines, as Reported Injuries Exceed 850,000

    RISK OF VACCINATION

    Here is a visual of the reported adverse events to the COVID vaccines that have been available since February 2021. Notice the number of children suffering from heart attacks and heart conditions.

    Reports represent less than 10% of actual adverse events. Many doctors and hospitals refuse to report. Many families suffering from injury don’t know nor have the time to submit a report as they are struggling with the impact of severe health conditions that result from the vaccination. These shots are liability-free for the administrators and manufacturers. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/covid-19-vaccine-is-liability-free-for-everyone-but-you/

    “There are several children/teens in the Boise area that have suffered as a direct result of the vaccine. Educate before you vaccinate. Research for yourself what the risk of the disease is to your child. Is it worth risking an experimental medical product that has NO long-term studies? “ – mom concerned about vaccine risks

  • Vaccine Risk and Informed Consent

    When a person experiences an adverse event – a new symptom, injury, or condition – anything from headache or nausea, to serious or severe illness such as shortness of breath, stroke, or heart attack, this should be reported to VAERS. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report

    Whether the event is considered to be related to or caused by the vaccination itself, is not up to the individual reporting the event, to decide. All events, especially within 45 days following a vaccine, should be reported, regardless of the presumed cause.

    Dr. Fauci himself recognizes that adverse events from vaccines can occur up to 45 days after the dose.

    However, Fauci fails to mention that vaccines have been found to contribute to the development of injuries or chronic disease months or even years post-vaccination.

    Autoimmune or chronic illnesses including thrombocytopenia, gulf war illness, macrophagic myofasciitis, and autoimmune-inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) have been discovered and studied by various researchers around the world over the past two to three decades.

    INFORMED CONSENT: COVID-19 Vaccines

    Explore key questions and answers about the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

    https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/covid-19-vaccines/

  • IS THAT MASK GIVING YOU LUNG CANCER?

    PARENTS! Have you wondered about the risk to our children when they are forced to breathe their own viral and bacterial exhaust for hours on end? Have you seen the statistics that show that their risk of the virus to their overall well being is outrageously small? Are you still following orders and masking your family?

    Guy Guy Crittenden, who, for 25 years, edited the trade journal HazMat Management has published an article regarding his deep concerns about masks. We are sharing his insight with his permission.

    ____
    I happen to know a thing or two about masks and safety. Why? Because for 25 years I was the editor of an award-winning trade magazine called HazMat Management that covered such topics as pollution prevention and compliance with health & safety laws. We routinely published articles on masks, gloves, respirators, and other forms of personal protective equipment (PPE).

    Now let me tell you a few things about that mask you’re wearing. And please note that what I’m about to share was also stated in the most recent edition of Del Bigtree’s program The Highwire when two OSHA mask experts spoke to the fact that the kinds of masks people are wearing were never (never!) designed to be worn for long periods and doing so is very harmful.

    1. Masks are “sterilized” with Ethylene Oxide — a known carcinogen. Many teachers in various school boards have been experiencing significant symptoms as a direct result of the effects of this chemical.

    2. The masks contain (not sprayed with) PTFE which makes up Teflon along with other chemicals.


    I found and have posted the US patent to allow manufacturers to use PTFE as a filter in commercial masks… breathing these for extended periods can lead to lung cancer.”


    Don’t agree? Argue with the experts at OSHA, which is the main US agency, i.e., its Occupational Health & Safety Agency. These masks are meant to be worn only for short periods, like say if you’re sanding a table for an hour and don’t want to inhale sawdust.

    They don’t do anything whatsoever to stop the spread of any virus, and the emerging science of virology now understands that viruses aren’t even passed from person to person.

    I know that sounds incredible, but it’s the case that the virus is in the air, you breathe it in, there’s no way to prevent that short of living in an oxygen tent, and if you have a strong immune system you’ll be fine, and if you have a weak immune system you may have to deal with the effects of your immune system working to restore balance within your metabolism.


    So let’s say you don’t wear the blue packaged masks, and instead wear a homemade cloth mask — the kind people wear over and over and hang on their rearview mirror and so on.

    Those masks are completely useless against a virus, and are also very dangerous. OSHA would never condone a person wearing a mask of this kind for anything more than the shortest time. Re-breathing your own viral debris is dangerous to health, and the oxygen deprivation children suffer wearing such masks all day will certainly cause brain damage. I’m not making this up.

    The many negatives to mandated mask-wearing.

    https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com
    https://www.brighteon.com/a0a04e0d-5861-458c-9799-78ec5023514c

    Again, you might say, well, Guy you’re not a doctor. True, but I did edit that magazine for 25 years. That’s a long time and many articles on masks and PPE. I’ve attended numerous OH&S conferences and listened to experts discussing these matters.

    You may hear people saying that surgeons and nurses wear masks like this all day. Um, no. No, they don’t. They’re trained in the proper use of masks, which is to wear them in the OR, then dispose of the mask when they leave that room. Are you aware that operating rooms are actually supplied extra oxygen, to compensate for the reduction in oxygen flow from mask-wearing?

    To my mind, it’s criminal (not hyperbole) to force children to wear masks all day. Setting aside the very real psychological effects, we’re going to have a generation of brain-damaged children. Ever heard the expression, “Not enough oxygen at birth?” That’s a joke at the expense of a mentally challenged person, but that’s literally what we’re doing. And we’re told it’s to “keep us safe”! We’re told this by doctors who actually don’t know about PPE and laypeople who have no clue.

    So, you can choose to believe me or not, but I was the editor for a quarter-century of a magazine that had a strong occupational health and safety mandate, and I can tell you that the mask-wearing currently mandated by governments and private businesses offers no health benefit whatsoever, in no way protects you or anyone else from any virus, and actually, does you damage beyond wearing it for a few minutes.

    Guy Crittenden

    Got that? Good. Now please share this message and get the conversation going with parents, who must end this masking of children immediately. This is a very serious matter. And related to that, let me just state this doesn’t end for me when the lockdown ends or the masking ends.

    No, this ends for me when every politician and bureaucrat who inflicted this travesty, this crime against humanity, on the population, is in the dock, and faces their misdeeds in a court of law!

    END NOTE: The CDC and WHO have acknowledged that asymptomatic people do not spread the virus, so the case for masks for such people is moot in the first place.”

    Published with permission from
    Guy Crittenden, who, for 25 years, edited the trade journal HazMat Management. Visit his site at HipGnosis.co

    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/15/do-masks-protect-you-from-covid-19.aspx

  • EMF Radiation from Cell Phones Proven Harmful to Health!

    Is there proof of harm due to long-term exposure to wireless radiofrequency electromagnetic (RF-EMF) radiation? On this episode of HealthMade radio, Dr. Michael Karlfeldt discusses electromagnetic fields and radiation with Dr. David Carpenter MD, co-editor of the 2012 BioInitiative Report BioInitiative Report that Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF.

    Dr. David Carpenter is the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany, and the author of the Bioinitiative Report, one of the very few publications to evaluate the safety concerns associated with cell phones. He received his degree at Harvard Medical School and has decades of experience studying public health and environmental contaminants, with more than 360 peer-reviewed articles bearing his name.

    On this episode of HealthMade radio, Dr. Michael Karlfeldt discusses electromagnetic fields and radiation with Dr. David Carpenter MD, and co-editor of the 2012 BioInitiative Report BioInitiative 2012 Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF.

    There is now much more evidence of risks to health affecting billions of people world-wide.   The status quo is not acceptable in light of the evidence for harm.“

    Dr. David Carpenter
    bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/BioInitiativePressRelease1-1-2013.pdf
    • How are we exposed to electromagnetic frequencies?
    • What is the electromagnetic spectrum?
    • What is an electrosensitivity?
    • What are the effects on the human body?
    • Could I be electromagnetically sensitive?

    THIS JUST IN: Verizon launches top-tier 5G service in New York City… and Boise – https://boisedev.com/news/2019/09/26/verizon-launches-top-tier-5g-service-in-new-york-city-and-boise/

    Did you agree to be a test subject?

    “There has been no premarket testing of this technology or the mix of frequencies we will be exposed to. There are no protective regulations to assure monitoring of radiation levels for each antenna or a registry to document reported health effects.” ~Physicians For Safe Technology
    https://mdsafetech.org/5g-telecommunications-science/

  • Remember Polio? Infectious Disease History Lesson.

    Do you remember the polio epidemic? Do you know why these days polio is extinct in the United States? Because of vaccinations. Why don’t you learn from history?

    Panelist: The mortality rates from diseases such as, diphtheria, polio, and measles, declined by 95-98% prior to the introduction of these vaccines. See here at length.

    Also, many once-deadly diseases such as cholera, typhoid, typhus, tuberculosis, and scarlet fever, declined and disappeared AT THE SAME RATE AND DURING THE EXACT SAME TIME PERIOD AS THE OTHER DISEASES, BUT WITHOUT ANY VACCINE. 

    Therefore, the conclusion that mortality rates declined solely because of a vaccine is questionable, at best. See here at length.

    Regarding polio, pertussis (whooping cough), and influenza, the vaccines only protect the one who received them from severe symptoms of these diseases, but not from contracting the diseases and transmitting them to others. 

    (Therefore, someone who does take the vaccine is just as likely to spread these diseases as someone who does not.) In fact, someone vaccinated is more likely to spread disease, as the vaccinated could have an asymptomatic infection, and will not take the necessary precautions to avoid public places while infected. See here point number 4 on the downloadable pdf and sources.

    If we were convinced of the efficacy and safety of a vaccine against a deadly global epidemic, we would surely vaccinate against it.

    Learn more about POLIO

  • How “Science” Works in the World of Vaccines

    The amount of bad research in relation to the liability free medical products (vaccines) is alarming, that data is sculpted to fit a preferred theory. All the vaccine manufacturers are guilty of fraud and have paid millions of dollars in fines. They tell us the vaccines are safe and effective so why do we believe them? Because, we are told, the science is settled and they point to studies in ‘peer-reviewed’ journals.

    Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, has said:

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine”  (source)

    Ashley Everly, toxicologist who consults Health Freedom Idaho shares how “science” works in the world of vaccines, using a metaphor.

    You have 10 studies showing that jumping in front of a moving bus in the US won’t kill you.

    These studies are used to claim that it’s perfectly safe to do this. All bus drivers are knowledgeable about the roadways, always obey traffic laws, and will always stop before they hit you. If you do get hit, don’t worry, buses are made extra safe and do not cause any real harm beyond bumps and bruises.

    On the other side, you have 5 independently funded studies which have found you can absolutely die or be severely injured if you jump in front of a moving bus in the US. 

    The speed at which buses typically move are much faster than is safe for individuals to jump in front of them And not be severely harmed.

    Of the ten studies claiming safety:

    • 5 excluded data on two or more of the following conditions:
      •  If the injury occurred on roadways where the speed limit was over 15 mph.
      •  If the injury occurred when bus drivers were speeding.
      •  If the injury occurred with bus drivers who wear prescription glasses. 
      •  If the buses had not had a tune up in the past three years.
    • The other 5 compared accidents of newly hired bus drivers to bus drivers with the most experience (these individuals were all over 65 years of age) and found no difference in the amount of injuries.

      They only included deaths in those who were hit by buses, for ten minutes, post-accident. They determined that any injuries and subsequent deaths in that time frame were due to pre-existing conditions, and concluded bus drivers and moving buses are completely safe.

    • 3 of them were funded by the government. The main author of two of them has a criminal record. One of the authors of the 3rd study blew the whistle that their study was fraudulent.
    • The remaining 7 were funded by the automobile industry or American Bus Driver Association.  

    Based on the above “settled science”, US regulatory agencies, legislators, the bus industry, advisory groups, and mainstream news media all claim that jumping in front of moving buses is completely safe, and there’s no evidence otherwise. In fact, state and federal legislators have suggested mandating the procedure on all people. 

    Meanwhile, the US government quietly pays out billions of dollars to bus-injured victims, for severe injuries and deaths, and hundreds of thousands of individuals who previously believed jumping in front of moving buses was safe, but have subsequently been harmed by doing so, are trying to warn others of the risks.

    ____

    The obvious conclusion that should be reached is that the ‘science’ a farce. This has been reported by the Editor of a topic medical journal who admitted that ‘50% Of Pro-Vaccine Science Is Fraudulent’  

    Documents obtained by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, which reveal that vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, and health authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is scientific fraud, and their complicity suggests that this practice continues to this day. (source)

    Please investigate every medical procedure recommended for your child. Vaccines have caused many children to have permanent injury, a lifetime of auto-immune disease, disability and sometimes even death. Denial of vaccine injury and damage by a medical professional does not change the facts. Vaccines have been legally classified as “unavoidably unsafe” and all vaccine manufacturers are legally shielded from any and all liability if their products cause harm. Becky Hastings

  • Injecting Toxins Is Improving Health?

    In the current US National Vaccine Schedule, in the first 6 years of life your child receives the following Vaccine Ingredients. Canada is no different.
    Imagine injecting all this into an apple and making a child eat it? Then understand that people are injecting all this under the skin of their child. Think about how all that below is meant to mimic a disease you catch out in nature. 

    Can you “inject health” into malnourished people, using poison? It only makes sense if you don’t think about it.

    Vaccines contain toxins including gug repellent, neurotoxins, aborted cow blood, carcinogens, embalming agents, ground up animal carcasses, human blood, aborted human babies DNA, antibiotic, chemical used as part of lethal injections, liquid fertilizer, baking soda, cockroach control, food additives, corrosive substances, fungus, waste from human urine, a mercury compound. Injected numerous times in childhood, into a developing infant and child. See the shocking list below. 

    • 17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (gug Repellent, some brands of Antifreeze)
    • 5,700 mcg aluminum (a known neurotoxin)
    • Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (aborted cow blood)
    • 801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
    • 23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal carcasses)
    • 500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
    • 760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetes)
    • Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
    • Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
    • Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
    • Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
    • 116 mcg potassium chloride (used in lethal injection to shut down the heart and stop breathing)
    • 188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
    • 260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
    • 70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control)
    • 54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
    • Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
    • Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
    • 2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
    • Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
    • 32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
    • 0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
    • Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
    • 35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
    • 5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
    • Other chemical residuals – including thimerosal – a mercury compound (mercury is the 3rd most toxic substance found anywhere on the planet)

    – Note: Dr Nuzum shared this information publicly on his Facebook page.

    Daniel Nuzum is a seasoned and dedicated medical professional with proven expertise and demonstrated success as a Doctor of Osteopathy, Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine, Doctor of Indigenous Medicine, and a Doctor of Natural Medicine. www.drnuzum.com

    RESOURCES:

    Read the Manufacturer’s inserts: www.tinyurl.com/13cancer

    Read the CDC excipient List: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf

  • Toxicologist Mom Answers Questions on Vaccines

    Ashley speaks to local new station about vaccine hesitancy and how her view on vaccines changed after vaccination of her son triggered a vaccine reaction. 

    She says in her public facebook post 

    As someone who once believed in vaccines, who vaccinated my child, I’m asking you to hear me out. 

    I know you might think I am either (1) stupid, (2) uneducated, or (3) crazy. I know you think questioning vaccine safety is akin to believing in conspiracy theories. I know you are angered to think that there are people putting children in harm’s way because of the increasing rate of vaccine refusal.

    …

    Believe me, it took years of daily research and investigation into this issue before I began to decide that the potential benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the costs. And this was *after* vaccinating my child and watching him suffer neurodevelopmental and cognitive delays. This was after we began to deal with food allergies that gave him constant stomach pain and eczema.

    Let me add, that when I say the words “research” and “investigate”, I’m not talking about mom blogs or natural news websites with no sources or references for their information. I’m talking about published, peer reviewed scientific research from medical journals. I’m talking about data and records from the CDC website that you have to dig to find. I’m talking about important information about outbreaks and how to treat measles and whooping cough that doesn’t make the local or national news. I’m talking about historical records and archived articles… A significant amount of this information is behind paywalls. It’s not easily found or accessed unless you have come to learn what you need to search for.

    This is but a glimpse of all the information out there that we aren’t being given.

    VIDEO INTERVIEW Unaired interview with local news station + sources:
    https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/kboi-2-news-interview-with-a-toxicologist-on-vaccines

    BOOK Critical Vaccine Studies:

    https://amzn.to/2DxgvzH

    What doctors learn about vaccines in medical school:
    https://www.facebook.com/ashleyeverlyvax/posts/1131196103568691

    ARTICLE Conflicts of interest in medical education:
    https://www.facebook.com/ashleyeverlyvax/posts/1161909823830652

    ARTICLE Corruption in scientific research:
    https://www.facebook.com/ashleyeverlyvax/posts/1371432082878424

    Washington Post NEWSPAPER ARTICLE As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-drug-industrys-influence-over-research-grows-so-does-the-potential-for-bias/2012/11/24/bb64d596-1264-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_story.html

    NY Times NEWSPAPER ARTICLE Harvard Medical School in Ethics Quandary:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/business/03medschool.html

    GREEN MED INFO The CDC owns patents on vaccines (please check all of the sources in this article linking to the patents):
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/examining-rfk-jrs-claim-cdc-owns-over-20-vaccine-patents

    Bad science:
    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2018/03/13/its-that-bad-in-an-embarrassment-to-harvard-and-yale-journal-of-pediatrics-and-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-publishes-another-great-example-of-junk-science-pertussis-vaccination-in-pre

    Cons of vaccinating [read the links contained within this article]:
    https://thinklovehealthy.com/2016/10/25/the-cons-of-vaccinating

    “Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 [micro]g/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with a central nervous system and bone toxicity. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration.”
    https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm
    >> And infants are receiving a lot more aluminum than this in their vaccines.

    Nutrition was the biggest factor in the decline of disease mortality, not vaccines:
    http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/rosner/g8965/client_edit/readings/week_2/mckinlay.pdf

    “Of the total fall in the standardized death rate between 1900 and 1973, 92.3 percent occurred prior to 1950.”

    Year vaccine was introduced:
    Polio: 1955
    Measles: 1963
    Mumps: 1967
    Rubella: 1969

    Measles adverse event rate pre-1960s vs current rate of adverse events from the MMR vaccine:
    https://www.facebook.com/ashleyeverlyvax/posts/1756143344407294

    Measles, before the vaccine, and now:
    https://www.facebook.com/jbhandleyjr/videos/1914488961924583/

    [ASIA] Autoimmune (auto-inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (e.g. Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines). Vaccination triggers rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, thyroid disease, and other autoimmune conditions:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23992328/

    Macrophagic myofasciitis [MMF]: characterization and pathophysiology:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22235051/

    MMF-associated cognitive dysfunction triggered by vaccination. “Affected patients usually are middle-aged adults, mainly presenting with diffuse arthromyalgias, chronic fatigue, and marked cognitive deficits…”:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25506338/

    MMF has been found to be directly triggered by tetanus, Hep A, or Hep B vaccination. Long-term persistence of aluminum injected intramuscularly via vaccine eventually causes systemic symptoms, which can manifest 3-96 months (8 years) later. Median time to symptoms onset is 11 months post-vaccination:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11522584/

    …And there’s so much more.

  • Kids Vaccinated with Flu Mist Are Spreading Disease

    After seeing a 2% drop in vaccine sales for flu, the ACIP panel brought back the ineffective FluMist live virus multi-strand flu vaccines. It was so ineffective last time it was pulled mid season because it hardly worked. This time doctors won’t know for sure if it works better than before — or better than other vaccine options — until it’s widely used again during an actual flu season. They just want your family to participate in their experiment. More astonishing is they are aware that this vaccine has the innate ability to expose EVERYONE around the vaccinated individual with multiple strains of the flu for almost month. Why would the agency designed to ‘control disease’ the CDC and manufacturers, whose products protect us from disease, intentionally putting children at day cares, schools and teams at greatest risk for flu ‘outbreaks’ this year?

    Just like a dog or cat sheds hair, the human body gives off, or “sheds,” flu virus when infected. FluMist contains weakened, but live flu strains that infect the body enough to provoke a response from the immune system, but aren’t meant to make a person sick.The manufacturer argued that more viral shedding suggested that the virus was activating the immune system -WebMD

    What does SHEDDING mean?

    It means capable of spreading the multiple strains of flu to all the other children in daycare, students in the classroom, children on the team, teachers, coaches, grandparents…you get the idea. So according to SCIENTIFIC evaluations of the vaccines performed by the manufacturers the vaccinated children are putting EVERYONE at risk exposing them to multiple strains of the flu after being vaccinated with the multiple strand flu mist vaccine.

    Manufactured Flu Season?

    While you are getting the needle free flu midst for your child to protect them you will instead be exposing those around your child with multiple strains of the flu for up to 69 days according to studies. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission –http://ow.ly/z75m300DfJg

    The most recent research from the National Academy of Sciences proves that people who are vaccinated spread the virus more, are not protected, and prior vaccination is harming people’s immunity!

    Does the flu vaccine protect you or those around you? 

    Well according to the research, the opposite would be true. The findings of the study found that those individuals who had received the flu vaccine were “shedding” 6.3 times more virus than the unvaccinated!
    Straight from the research:

    “Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

    “The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”

    Plain Language.

    Higher viral shedding means that those who were vaccinated were breathing out more influenza virus and would be spreading it more than the unvaccinated. So when doctors, health departments, or health “authorities” like the CDC push the vaccine by saying things like “the vaccine protects you and those around you,” “everyone needs the vaccine because of ‘herd’ immunity,” or “you have to get the vaccine so you protect the very young, the elderly and the very weak/cancer patients etc.,” they would actually be lying.

    6.3 times more aerosol shedding means that those who were vaccinated were spreading more virus into the air around them just by breathing when compared to those who had not received the vaccine that same year and/or the flu vaccine from the previous year. 

    The implications of this finding now show that those who are vaccinated pose a greater risk to the immune compromised, i.e. cancer patients, the elderly and the very young and that the unvaccinated spread the disease less and protect others better! 

    In essence, the vaccine does the exact opposite of what people have been told and explains why we are seeing more and more people get sick earlier each year and more people die from the flu.

    Reduced protection with annual vaccination, means that the flu vaccine weakens a person immunity against infectious illness. This fact has been shown in multiple studies on children and confirmed with animal studies. One such study deserving of “honorable mention” is this study: Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: A case-control study which found that children receiving the annual flu vaccine had a “threefold increased risk of hospitalization.”

    <Read more https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/ >

    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20180222/flumist-may-be-coming-back

  • Tylenol Just Once A Month Raises A Child’s Asthma Risk 540%

    A major study of over 20,000 children suggests that giving Tylenol even as infrequently as once per year could have a permanent, life-threatening health effect. The vast majority of babies are given Tylenol (acetaminophen) within the first six months of life. It is the go-to medicine for modern parents for the last several decades as pediatricians have recommended for almost every ailment an infant or child may suffer from. But what if the newest evidence is showing that it isn’t as safe as we were led to believe? 

    Researchers at the University of A Coruna in Spain asked the parents of 10,371 children ages 6-7 and 10,372 adolescents aged 13-14 whether their children had asthma and how often they had been given acetaminophen within the previous year and when they were babies.

    The children in the younger age group who had received the medicine only once per year were at 70% greater risk for asthma while those receiving Tylenol once a month or more were shockingly 540% more likely to have asthma.

    The study, published in the European Journal of Public Health, also found that children who had even a single dose of Tylenol before their first birthday had a 60% risk of developing asthma. In the older age group of 13 and 14 year-olds, asthma was 40 percent more likely if they had taken acetaminophen within the previous 12 months. The young teenagers were 250% more at risk if they took it once a month.

    The researchers speculated that Tylenol, called paracetamol in the UK, may reduce a potent antioxidant called glutathione in the lungs and blood, which results in damage to the lung tissue. Glutathione is produced by the body (it is a combination of three amino acids: cysteine, glycine and glutamine) and is referred to as the “mother” of all antioxidants by Dr. Mark Hyman MD.

    While Tylenol use is strongly associated with a significant increase in asthma and the effect is greater the more often the drug is taken, no causal link is yet established via randomized-controlled trials.

    Does this mean the results of this large study should be dismissed and parents should continue favoring use of the popular over the counter medication for fever and pain? Not so fast. It would certainly be the wise and cautious approach for parents to investigate alternatives to Tylenol while additional follow-up research is performed.

    • Asthma rates have been on the increase for decades at the same time Tylenol use became more widespread. The potential link cannot and should not be ignored.
    • Examination of 20,000 children establishing such a strong associative risk must be taken seriously and the dismissal of the research by some doctors is irresponsible given the seriousness and life-altering outcome of an asthma diagnosis.

    “All the asthma symptoms analyzed increased significantly with paracetamol consumption,” the researchers wrote.

    Other Autoimmune Illness Also Higher in Children Who Use Tylenol

    The associative link is even stronger when one considers that another autoimmune disease is also more prevalent in Tylenol use making the probability of inverse causation far less likely. Inverse causation would mean that children with asthma are simply more likely to pick up coughs and colds that require painkillers.

    • For example, the Spanish study also concluded that the prevalence of eczema in children increased dramatically the more frequently Tylenol was used.
    • In addition, scientists in New Zealand found in 2010 that Tylenol use before the age of 15 months was associated with a higher risk of children having allergies at the age of six.
    • Also in 2010, another large study of 11,000 children conducted by the Imperial College of London demonstrated that taking Tylenol in the first six months of life was associated with a higher prevalence of asthma and wheezing.
    • Prior to that in 2009, researchers at the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute in Canada found a higher risk of asthma for both adults and children via a meta-analysis of existing research.

    Should savvy and health conscious parents wait awhile until the likely causative relationship is established?

    Definitely not!

    With such repetitive and significant associative links firmly established, taking that Children’s Tylenol and chucking it in the trash would be a really constructive action step. There is absolutely no reason to use this product when raising children anyway. I’ve personally never owned a bottle of Children’s Tylenol let alone used it anytime in the past 15 years since my first child was born. There are plenty of other non-toxic options for dealing with fevers and pain in your young ones!

    Another constructive action step? Finding a quality local pasture based farm and having your children drink unpasteurized grassfed milk. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology reported in August 2011 that children who drank raw milk had a 41% reduced chance of developing asthma. These same children had a nearly 50% reduction in hay fever as well even when other relevant factors were considered.

    Written by Sarah, The Healthy Home Economist

    About the Author

    Sarah is the founder of The Healthy Home Economist,™ which has been featured on NBC, ABC, The Huffington Post, Dr. Mercola, Infowars, Prison Planet, BabyCenter, GreenMedInfo.com, NaturalNews.com and many others. Sarah has had the honor of taking the message of Traditional Diet abroad and has been interviewed on the national TV evening news from as far away as the Philippines. For her full biography visit her website.

    Sources:

    Babies given Calpol just once a month are five times as likely to develop asthma : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21051083

    Glutathione: The Mother of All Antioxidants

    It’s Too Soon to Blame Paracetemol for Rising Childhood Asthma Rates

    Exposure to Paracetemol and Asthma Symptoms

    The effects of early and late paracetamol exposure on asthma and atopy: a birth cohort

    Prenatal and infant acetaminophen exposure, antioxidant gene polymorphisms, and childhood asthma

    Acetaminophen use and the risk of asthma in children and adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis

    Reduce Your Child’s Asthma Risk by 41%

    Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of WakingTimes or its staff.

    This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.

    Additional Medical Study Resources: *some of these might be behind paywalls :
    https://www.webmd.com/asthma/news/20091105/acetaminophen-may-be-linked-to-asthma-risk

    https://www.health.com/allergy/tylenol-asthma

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21051083