Tag: safety

  • Vaccine Rolls Out to Healthcare Workers as Safety Concerns Remain Unresolved

     The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare anticipates receiving and distributing the Pfizer COVID-19 by mid-December, first to healthcare providers then to people living and working in long-term care facilities.

    About 13,650. Idahoans will be injected with this fast-tracked vaccine this month. The healthcare workers who will receive the 2 dose injections will be those who have the highest exposure risk in the hospital. This means those individuals who are currently working with patients who have tested positive for COVID experiencing reoccurring exposure to the virus.

    Pfizer and BioNTech’s new vaccine is a new-style of immunization called an mRNA vaccine. MRNA jabs work by training the immune system to fight off the virus by using a small piece of genetic code from Covid-19. Once injected, human cells are triggered to make parts of the virus which are known as “spike proteins”. The immune system recognizes these proteins as foreign and so produces antibodies to attack the virus and guard the immune system against infection. As a completely new technology, there is no way of knowing what this manipulation of our DNA will do to our bodies our immune system, or its impact on our unborn future generations.

    Has the antibody-dependent enhancement been resolved?

    Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is vaccine-enhanced disease that causes the vaccinated person to develop a clinically severe form of Covid-19 after exposure SARS-CoV-2.

    Scientists have been trying to make coronavirus vaccines for decades and have not been successful. Previous SARS-CoV vaccines that they initially thought were successful because of the robust antibody production, turned out to make the disease worse when subjects were challenged by infection.

    Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is an intriguing mechanism by which certain antibodies actually enhance viral replication by promoting the entry of the pathogen into immune cells (eg, macrophages) resulting in worsening of the infection.

    Dr. Peter Hotez (scientist, vaccinology) and Dr. Paul Offit (co-creator of the rotavirus vaccine) both stated earlier this year, regarding the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. They expressed concern that no coronavirus vaccine has ever been successful because of this very issue. (Both of these doctors are very pro-vaccine and can often be found invalidating the real risks of vaccines and the reality of widespread vaccine injury.)

    In this video footage, Offit, Hotez, and even Fauci (in an unguarded moment), warn that any new coronavirus vaccine could trigger lethal immune reactions, “vaccine enhancement,” when vaccinated people come in contact with the wild virus. Instead of proceeding with caution, Fauci made the reckless choice to fast track vaccines, partially funded by Gates, without critical animal studies before moving into human clinical trials that could provide early warning of runaway immune responses.

    VIEW THE VIDEO HERE: https://tinyurl.com/y9st8pot

    While current vaccines being developed have been touted in the news as successful (giving the CEOs a chance to sell high while they can – Moderna / Pfizer), their “success” is based on antibody production… not on challenging the test subjects/participants with the virus to see if there is successful protection from or enhancement of disease.

    They don’t require those kinds of real-world tests (maybe it’s just “too risky”, as a former Chief Medical Officer from Merck states in this article), regardless of the potential for antibody-dependent enhancement (though it looks like the U.K. might attempt this soon):

    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/11/17/21540773/covid-19-vaccine-human-challenge-trial-ethics

    Our medical heroes who are on the front lines will return to work and continue to be exposed to those who are infected. The trials have not tested what happens to those who are exposed to the virus after injection.

    It’s concerning to think of the risk posed to the individuals and our community further putting when our front line healthcare workers in harm’s way IF the vaccine causes a more severe case of the virus.

    November 2020: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220307311

    “…the detailed mechanism of ADE [antibody-dependent enhancement] and how to resolve this in coronavirus infections is not yet totally clear. From previous research on ADE in other coronaviruses, in particular SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, it appears that the existence of ADE will elicit more severe body injury… This may affect the results of vaccine therapy.

    The presence of this phenomenon in these two coronaviruses indicates a potential risk in the vaccine therapy for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as it shares the same viral receptor and similar genome sequence with SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 may have a similar mechanism of viral entry and thus may share similar mechanisms of ADE.

    This novel coronavirus has not long been known, so studies in this field have not yet led to any conclusions.”

    Unfortunately, it appears that it is our healthcare workers who will be ‘safety testing’ this vaccine.

    Additional Reading on the Fast Tracked Vaccine and Lack of Safety Studies:

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2033538

  • Flu Shot NEVER Licensed For Use During Pregnancy

    The #FDA admits it has never licensed any influenza vaccine for use by pregnant women and does not have a single clinical trial supporting the safety of this practice. 

    The CDC widely and vigorously promotes that all pregnant women receive an influenza vaccine. The state health departments amplify that promotion on their websites, offices and clinics. 

    ICAN, therefore, submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the FDA, requesting copies of the clinical trials it relied upon when licensing any influenza vaccine for use in pregnant women. When the FDA failed to respond to this request an appeal, and lawsuit, ensued. In the end, as seen from the document which ended the lawsuit, it is clear the FDA has not licensed any influenza vaccine as an indicated use for pregnant women, let alone conducted or required any pharmaceutical company to conduct any clinical trial which supports the safety of injecting pregnant women with the #flushot. 

    You can view the document here.

    This lapse in safety is astonishing given HHS’s statutory obligation to ensure the safety of vaccines used by all Americans, especially the most vulnerable among us, pregnant women and unborn babies. 

    In fact, vaccine manufacturers request that doctors register pregnant patients in their database so they can track the outcome and chart vaccine reactions. Pregnant moms and their unborn babies are the TEST SUBJECTS.

    Manufacturers have effective immunity from liability for injuries caused by vaccines. It is for this reason congress made the US Department of Health and Human Services, including its agencies such as the CDC and FDA, singularly responsible for the safety of vaccinations. This responsibility demands, under federal law 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27, that HHS and its agencies assure that only safe vaccines are licensed.

    Here in Idaho, the Idaho Health Department promotes these untested vaccines by injecting them into pregnant women.

    Is this upsetting to you? Then join us as a member, donor, 5-minute activist, or sign up as a member on this website. Join thousands of others who don’t accept pregnant woman, pre-born babies and children being injected with untested vaccines that the real-world data has proven that they are indeed not safe. 

  • Stop the Neighborhood Cell Tower Eagle Idaho

    New cell tower proposed in the backyard of neighborhood in Eagle Idaho. Home owners say, 

    “While we are not opposed to improved telecommunications, there are much less controversial areas for such development where safe placement is AWAY FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. Consider Nearby Open Land, instead of steps from homes! We are FOR a tower ALL can BENEFIT from, on adjacent nearby hills, rather than our backyards. We are petitioning for this tower to be STOPPED, and moved to a non-residential area where it belongs!”

    <SIGN THE PETITION HERE!>

    For current updates visit www.reactunite.org 

    ATTEND THE HEARING: new date!
    October 18th
    6 pm in Commissioners Main Hearing Room #1235 (first floor),
    200 W Front St, Boise, ID

    ATTENTION:  Our Eagle Neighborhood off Beacon Light between Ballanytne & Eagle Rd  IS THE NEXT PROPOSED SITE FOR A MONO-PINE CELL TOWER!  IF ADA COUNTY APPROVES THE PERMIT MANY SURROUNDING HOME OWNERS WILL BE FORCED TO LIVE WITH IT, OR MOVE, WHILE THE PROPERTY OWNERS MAKE ENDLESS MONEY.  WE ARE UNITING ALL EFFORTS TO HAVE IT RE-LOCATED! 

    SIGN THE PETITION AND JOIN THE 60+ HOMES WITHIN 1,000 FT OF IMPACT NOW!

    1. Tell ADA COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING TO DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT required to erect this tower on RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY and to RESPECT AND PROTECT CITY OF EAGLE PROPERTY OWNERS INVESTMENTS, PRIVACY, QUALITY OF LIFE, SAFETY & HEALTH.

    2. Tell the TAYLOR FAMILY, OWNERS OF 2557 N. SKY VIEW LANE, EAGLE, ID that moving to our beautiful state and misusing their residential property for business and financial gain at the expense of the City of Eagle, ID residents is not OK!

    • · THE PROPERTY OWNERS DO NOT LIVE ON PROPERTY WHICH IS ZONED ADA COUNTY, NOT CITY OF EAGLE. 
    • · THE PROPERTY OWNERS DISCREETLY SIGNED A LEASE WITH VERIZON IN DECEMBER 2017 FOR A MONTHLY LEASE PAYOUT. WE WERE NOT INFORMED UNTIL MAY, NOR CONSIDERED IN THEIR GREEDY DECISION.
    • · THE PROPOSED TOWER MARKER IS LITERALLY PLACED APPROXIMATELY 25 STEPS FROM THE CLOSEST PROPERTY LINE, 60 STEPS FROM THE NEAREST FAMILY’S POOL, AND 80 STEPS FROM NEAREST HOMES! THIS DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE 50×50 FOOT ENCLOSURE PLACED WITHIN STEPS OF OUR PROPERTY LINES!

    3. Tell POWDER RIVER DEVELOPMENT, LLC of Eagle, in conjunction with HORIZON TOWER, LLC of California on behalf of VERIZON, to MOVE THE TOWER TO A NON-RESIDENTIAL AREA, and hold them accountable for MISLEADING OUR RESIDENTS with the following information:

    • ·Homes within 1,000ft of the proposed site may or may not have received notification of the community meeting in May via mail.
    • ·We are finding these notification(s) provided conflicting information on date, time and place.

    Most have not been concerned, and did not attend the community meeting simply based on the outdated (6+ years) satellite map that was sent out in notification, showing minimal homes in the area.  This map went a step further to add to our confusion by cropping out Beacon Light just above the image, or any main road/cross streets for that matter to help in determining location.  Most of us, upon looking at that map had no idea where this area was. The most current satellite map from 2017 of exact areas shows a much different picture with thriving developments, and a TRUE picture of the impact of erecting a cell tower will cause.  REFERENCE ABOVE IMAGES.

    Document Discrepancies: Several documents state heights ranging from 65’-93’. Site placement markers have been moved on the property, however geo coordinates do not match newest location (red arrow).

    We are not overstating the issues below. All information is readily available online and quite telling.

    1. BE READY FOR A DECREASE IN YOUR PROPERTY VALUE! You will be required to disclose this tower on any and all home/property sale transactions. Homeowners all over the country with towers being erected near their homes are dealing with value losses up to 20% or more!

    2. Additionally, the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT in our rural area includes disruption to animal and bird migration patterns, and loss of habitat.

    3. Apart from, and in addition to the unknown health and environmental concerns, cell towers become EYESORES (even when falsely made to look like trees). Unfortunately, this one will stand alone in a property of weeds, enclosed by a 50×50 fence with no chance of blending in.

    4. NOISE NUISANCE from AC units & generators, INVASION of PRIVACY as workers will have clear shots into windows of homes and yards.

    5. Last but definitely not least are the ample disturbing publications in recent research by top world renowned scientists and doctors over the UNKNOWN HEALTH RISKS of long-term effects of exposure to cell towers which emit high-frequency radio waves, or microwaves. Safe distance from these towers is .25 miles. YOU are INSIDE of the .25 mile unsafe area! The closer you are, the greater the danger. The microwaves from cell phone towers have been shown to interfere with your body’s own EMFs, causing a variety of potential health problems, including Headaches, Memory loss, Cardiovascular stress, Low sperm count, Birth defects, and Cancer. 

    Watch GENERATION ZAPPED available online through Amazon An eye-opening documentary about the true cost of living in the wireless age.

  • Vaccines and Immunocompromised Schoolchildren

    The nonprofit organization, Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), has released an information statement entitled “Vaccines: What About Immunocompromised Schoolchildren?” Because immunocompromised schoolchildren are among the most vulnerable children in school, this educational document focuses on concerns about their safety and addresses questions about risks that the vaccination status of schoolchildren might pose to their immunocompromised classmates.

    A safe environment for all persons, including schoolchildren, is the goal of everyone involved in public health. “It is important that the public be informed that the vaccination status of a child is not a significant risk to other schoolchildren in general, or to immunocompromised schoolchildren in particular,” said Dr. Shira Miller, PIC founder and president.

    To further inform senators considering new legislation, the information statement was recently shared with the California Senate Committee on Human Services in opposition to AB1992 which proposes to coerce vaccination by making it a prerequisite for receiving benefits from the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program. The Senate Committee includes Senators Scott D. Wiener (Chair), Tom Berryhill (Vice Chair), Steven M. Glazer, Connie M. Leyva, Mike McGuire, Janet Nguyen, and Anthony J. Portantino.

    As described in the information statement, some vaccines fail to prevent the spread of the bacteria or viruses they target, which means certain infectious diseases, such as pertussis (whooping cough), are spread regardless of a child’s vaccination status…
    Continue reading here: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/news/physicians-for-informed-consent-releases-information-statement-about-vaccines-and-immunocompromised-schoolchildren/
    #PICphysicians

  • Lachlan Neylan: 22 month old severely brain damaged after a flu shot – Learn The Risk

    Lachlan Neylan was a happy, walking and talking 22-month-old boy…until in March 2012 he was given a flu shot that almost cost him his life. He was left unable to walk or talk and suffered severe brain damage, including seizures and swelling of the brain, known as encephalopathy, after he was accidentally given a flu shot banned for children under age five in Australia, where this story takes place.

    Lachlan began having seizures within hours of the shots. His parents were told he was unlikely to live, but he managed to pull through. But he will likely never walk or talk again.

    He just collapsed and started to have seizures. Doctors said they thought our son wouldn’t make it through the weekend. It was terrifying,” said Lachlan’s father.

    Before the injection, Lachlan had been a “walking, talking toddler.” After the flu shot, he stopped being able to sit, walk or talk  and “he was back to being a three-month-old,” according to his parents.

    Fluvax (the shot given to Lachlan) had been banned for children under five in 2010 ­after it had been found to trigger febrile ­convulsions in one in every 100 children. Despite the ban the Department of Health confirmed the banned shot had been administered to 43 children under the age of five just that year. And the shot is regularly given to children older than five and adults.

    We don’t want anyone else to go through what we have been through,” said Mr Neylan after speaking out to media.

    The family’s home has now had to be turned into a ­rehabilitation centre for Lachlan, who is now faces a lifetime of disability. The family are yet to receive compensation for this injury that has completely changed their lives.

    Studies show that the flu shot rarely protects people from getting the flu and that increased vaccination does NOT reduce mortality in any age group. “We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group. Because fewer than 10% of all winter deaths were attributable to influenza in any season, we conclude that observational studies substantially overestimate vaccination benefit.” (Study published in Archives of Internal Medicine)

    So is that flu shot really worth the REAL risk? Just to escape a few days of rest… Think twice before rolling up your sleeve. Actually think three times, four times, five times….

    This article originally appeared at: https://www.learntherisk.org/stories/lachlan-neylan-22-month-old-severely-brain-damaged-after-a-flu-shot/.

  • Whooping Cough Outbreak: How Effective and Safe Is the Vaccine?

    CDC’s own reports show that the whooping cough vaccine is not effective each year more than 50% of the children with whopping cough were vaccinated with the childhood whooping cough DTaP vaccine. It only takes a quick scan of the literature online to notice that there are dozens, perhaps hundreds, of articles regarding outbreaks of pertussis, measles, and other contagious diseases around the United States in which the vast majority of the people infected had been fully vaccinated.

    So when it comes to blaming those who choose not to vaccinate (for whatever reason they wish), it doesn’t make any sense. The facts just don’t bear it out.

    CDC’s own statistics reveal the vaccine in ineffective.

    Here is an actual study published by the CDC in 2014 that shows 82% of vaccinated individuals got whooping cough 
    2016 it still the same story.

    -Number of un vaccinated children who had pertussis = 9%

    – Number of vaccinated children (with ALL THREE DOSES) who had pertussis = 49%
    – Number of vaccinated children (with less than 3 doses) who had pertussis = 6%

    Obviously this proves vaccines aren’t as effective as they preach! With a strong immune system, pertussis can be cured naturally. So why inject our children’s bodies with poisons that are only assaulting that immune system? Chemicals do NOT strengthen the immune system. They destroy it! 

    Why it doesn’t the Whooping Cough Vaccine work?

    Pertussis is a bacteria, not a virus, and it is in acellular form which is why there’s an “a” before the “P” in the name of the TDaP vaccine. It is chopped up bits of pertussis toxin (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00048610.htm) along with some other bacterial bits in the vaccine. The vaccine can cause someone to become an asymptomatic carrier of pertussis of they’re infected.

    So although “scientists say people are protected from the disease if vaccinated” people vaccinated against pertussis can spread the disease to others.4

    And this is precisely the point to bear in mind as you read about pertussis outbreaks. The outbreaks are not necessarily occurring because of the lack of so-called “herd immunity”—not enough people being vaccinated. They may well be occurring because of the vaccinated population itself.

    Let’s take a moment to talk about SAFETY. Since we have already dispelled the marketing campaign myth that the vaccine is ‘effective’. 

    CDC’s deceitful marketing campaign against pregnant women

    The CDC is still including the recommendation that pregnant women get a Tdap shot during every pregnancy. What is maddening is that the VACCINE MANUFACTURERS INSERT CLEARLY STATE: 

    It is also not known 253 whether Adacel vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Adacel vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.(TDAP Sanofi Pasteur Full Prescribing Information 306 – Adacel®)

    No human testing was done to identify if the GlaxoSmithKline version of the whooping cough vaccine is harmful to mother or child. So the company maintains a surveillance registry to collect data on pregnancy outcomes and newborn health status outcomes following vaccination with BOOSTRIX during pregnancy. Women who receive BOOSTRIX during pregnancy should be encouraged to contact GlaxoSmithKline directly or their healthcare provider should contact GlaxoSmithKline by calling 1-888-452-9622.

    So they aren’t testing it PRIOR to recommendation..pregnant moms and their preborn children ARE the experiment.

    Do the doctors disclose this fact as they are pressuring moms to ‘protect their child’ with a vaccine that hasn’t been tested or proven SAFE in pregnancy?

    LEARN MORE:

    TDaP and Flu in Pregnancy

    Recovering from Illness with Vitamin C

  • STOP Giving Your Child Tylenol!

    HFI: Tylenol. It’s in every medicine cabinet, recommended by doctors and ‘doctor grandma’. But the truth is … it’s bad. Really really bad. You should throw it out, run away from anyone who says you should use it, and never look back. It has a black box warning – one of the strongest warning given by the FDA. Its been shown to cause irreversable neurological damage in some children and can trigger serious reactions after typical childhood illnesses.

    Tylenol Makes Big Money and Can Cause Big Side Effects

    Tylenol (Acetaminophen) hit the scene in 1955 as a “prescription only” pain reliever, was making bank just a few years later, was acquired by Johnson and Johnson in 1959, and was available over the counter within a year after that. Tylenol has been a hugely successful product, making its billions off of parents who give it to their kids post-vaccine, post-nasal drip, during a cold, and for serious things like hang nail pains and 99 degree “send me over the edge” fevers.

    Tylenol Doesn’t Do What You Think it Does

    If you’re giving your child Tylenol for pain, a fever, or worse … giving it preemptively (prior to a procedure or vaccinations), you should know that it doesn’t do what you think it does. Tylenol doesn’t reduce pain, is a neurotoxic endocrine disruptor, is harmful to a developing fetus, and is even more harmful to babies and small children whose bodies’ can’t clear the drug.

    A 2008 study conducted by an epidemiologist showed that children who were given Tylenol after their MMR vaccine developed autism eight times as often as children given ibuprofen. In another study, males who were uncircumcised (and thus, were not given pain-relieving Tylenol), had a five times lower risk of autism. The studies go on and on.

    Tylenol is hazardous – They Have Known It For 40 years

    Now might not be the best time to tell you that Tylenol has a “black box warning” (the FDA’s strongest drug label warning) and contains the following ingredients:

    Carboxymethylcellulose sodium (a thickening agent), carrageenan (associated with cancer and gastrointestinal disease), citric acid, flavor, glycerin, hydroxyethyl cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, propylene glycol (a common ingredient in antifreeze that could be neurotoxic), propylparaben (a hazardous substance and endocrine disruptor), purified water, sodium benzoate, sorbitol solution, sucralose, and of course – acetaminophen.

    Don’t be fooled, the FDA is completely aware of the dangers associated acetaminophen. They promised to implement safety measures and dosage restrictions, warnings, and safety measures to protect consumers from the harms of Tylenol way back when, but never followed through.

     It’s been 40 years and they haven’t done a thing. Tylenol makes way too much money and you know about the FDA’s impressive ability to write-off children damaged by billion dollar industries.

    It’s not the 90s anymore and we can’t pretend that Tylenol is safe. We have to protect our children when those who are supposed to put the safeguards in place, don’t. That’s why we should probably stop giving our kids Tylenol.

    Portions of this article originally appeared at: http://www.livingwhole.org/why-you-should-stop-giving-your-kids-tylenol/.

  • Toxins and Our Kids

    Toxins and Our Kids

    During the past 50 years, more than 85,000 industrial chemicals have been registered in the United States alone.  The US is not alone as countries around the world including Canada and the United Kingdom face the same issues.  Many of these chemicals have found their way into children’s environments: in the food they eat, the water they drink, the air they breathe and the products to which they are exposed.  Some children may even be exposed to them while still in the womb.  Alarmingly, the majority of these chemicals are largely unstudied and unregulated until proof of harm is already established.  With their still developing bodies and high metabolic rate, children are the most vulnerable to their effects.  Exposure to these carcinogens by children is widespread, and the harmful effect on their still developing bodies is a cause of concern for parents worldwide.

    Children are exposed to chemicals, toxins and other carcinogens in many ways:

    • A mother’s breast milk can be contaminated with toxins that are inconsequential to adults but are a detriment to an infant’s health
    • Drinking water can often contain pharmaceuticals and farming pesticides
    • The ingredients of baby food may have been grown or treated using pesticides and other agricultural chemicals
    • Common household products (cleaners, personal care products, carpet and flame retardant found in furniture) can all be dangerous to a child’s health
    • Children’s toys may be manufactured with the use dangerous chemicals
    • Diesel exhaust and other manufacturing byproducts pollute the air supply of children

    How to we support our immune systems and the natural processes of detoxing? The Natural Health Symposium has several speakers who will help answer the question in great detail:
    • Dr Rostenberg of Red Mountain Natural Medicine will share how genetic dispositions such as MTHFR keep our bodies from detoxing and provides insights on how to work around those blocked detoxed pathways 
    • David DeHaas of Living Water Cleanse shares with us the THE ART & SCIENCE of HEALING THRU CLEANSING and DETOXIFICATION
    many other practioners will share insight in optimizing health and wellness supporting the body’s natural ability to detox from everyday toxins. 
    Don’t miss it! Natural Health Symposium get your tickets.

  • FLU SHOT? Not for my kids!

    FLU SHOT? Not for my kids!

    THE FLU SHOT IS NOT TESTED FOR SAFETY IN CHILDREN

    Despite what your health practitioner will say as they attempt to convince you to get the flu vaccine, the shot has not been evaluated for cancer risks, safety in pregnant women, or safety in various age range categories for children. 
    Once again a small bit of research reveals that vaccine science is not clear. 

    Vaccine package insert warnings which read as follows:
    • Flubok: “Safety and effectiveness in children 3 years to less than 18 years of age have not been established.”
    • Flucelvax: “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in children less than 18 years of age.”
    • Fluzone: “Safety and effectiveness in children below the age of 6 months have not been established.”
    • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”
    • FluLaval: “Safety and effectiveness in children younger than 3 years have not been established.”
    • Afluria: “…not approved for use in children less than 5 years of age.”
    • Fluarix: “…not approved for use in children younger than 3 years.”
    • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”

    READ THE LABEL!  
    Influenza vaccines contain three or four influenza virus strains and are produced using either chicken eggs or genetically-engineered dog kidney. Vaccine ingredients may include: formaldehyde, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, non-human protein and genetic materials, polysorbate 80, Thimerosal, MSG (monosodium glutamate), all of which are considered poisonous to humans.

    All Influenza Vaccines Clearly State:
    “This vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” 
     – see section 13.1 in all manufacturers inserts listed on left

    To make your research easier links are provided so that you can
    READ IT FOR YOURSELF
    Manufacture Package Inserts – Influenza
    Afluria Package Insert (injectable)
    bioCSL Inc.

    FluLaval Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmilthKline
       
    Fluad Package Insert
    Novartis (Seqirus)

    FluMist Quadrivalent Package Insert (intranasal)
    MedImmune, Inc.
       
    Fluarix Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluvirin Package Insert (injectable)
    Novartis (Seqirus) Vaccines

    Fluarix Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluzone Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur  

    Flublok Package Insert (injectable)
    Protein Sciences Corporation

    Fluzone High-Dose Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur
       
    Flucelvax Package Insert (injectable)
    Novartis

    Fluzone Intradermal Package Insert
    Sanofi Pasteur
       
    FluLaval Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluzone Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur
     
    RESEARCH & RETHINK VACCINES.