Tag: science

  • It took 20 years to realize that the weapon against insects is harmful to humans

    HFI: Pesticides. Harmful to insects, damaging to the environment, and creating havoc on human health for decades. DDT “A Handful of concentrated death”. For years, DDT was promoted as a safe and effective insect killer. It wasn’t until 20 years later, we realized that it was also a human killer. 

    Historical clips on DDT, Rachel Carson and science explaining why humans pollute. Video put together for the MSc in Environmental Technology.

     Today, nearly 40 years after DDT was banned in the U.S., we continue to live with its long-lasting effects:

    DDT spray on beach

    • Food supplies: USDA found DDT breakdown products in 60% of heavy cream samples, 42% of kale greens, 28% of carrots and lower percentages of many other foods.
    • Body burden: DDT breakdown products were found in the blood of 99% of the people tested by CDC.
    • Health impacts: Girls exposed to DDT before puberty are 5 times more likely to develop breast cancer in middle age, according to the President’s Cancer Panel.

    Banned for agricultural uses worldwide by the 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, the use of DDT is still permitted in small quantities in countries that need it, with support mobilized for the transition to safer and more effective alternatives. The treatment of DDT under the Stockholm Convention is strongly supported by PAN and our international partners.

    Rachel Carson highlighted the dangers of DDT in her groundbreaking 1962 book Silent Spring. Carson used DDT to tell the broader story of the disastrous consequences of the overuse of insecticides, and raised enough concern from her testimony before Congress to trigger the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    Her work attracted outrage from the pesticide industry and others. Her credibility as a scientist was attacked, and she was derided as “hysterical,” despite her fact-based assertions and calm and scholarly demeanor. Following the hearings, President Kennedy convened a committee to review the evidence Carson presented. The committee’s review completely vindicating her findings.

    One of the new EPA’s first acts was to ban DDT, due to both concerns about harm to the environment and the potential for harm to human health. There was also evidence linking DDT with severe declines in bald eagle populations due to thinning eggshells. Since DDT was banned in the U.S., bald eagles have made a dramatic recovery. 

    Recently, Carson’s work has again been targeted by conservative groups. Capitalizing on the iconic status of DDT, these groups are promoting widespread use of the chemical for malaria control as part of a broader effort to manufacture doubt about the dangers of pesticides, and to promote their anti-regulatory, free market agenda while attempting to undermine and roll back the environmental movement’s legacy.

    Many DDT promoters are also in the business of denying climate change.

    Attacks on Carson from groups like The Competitive Enterprise Institute and Africa Fighting Malaria portray DDT as the simple solution to malaria, and blame Carson for “millions of deaths in Africa.” Many of these DDT promoters are also in the business of denying climate change and defended the tobacco industry by denying the health harms of smoking.

    Human Health Harms

    The science on DDT’s human health impacts has continued to mount over the years, with recent studies showing harm at very low levels of exposure. Studies show a range of human health effects linked to DDT and its breakdown product, DDE:

    • breast & other cancers
    • male infertility
    • miscarriages & low birth weight
    • developmental delay
    • nervous system & liver damage
    This article originally appeared at: https://youtu.be/Ipbc-6IvMQI.
    More on DDThttp://www.panna.org/resources/ddt-story

  • Science is Settled. Really?

    In most aspects of our lives, we think it rational to make decisions based on incomplete information. Our beliefs, our reactions are based on flawed theories and manipulated facts. Science is never settled. It can’t be. So then, how do we make decisions and judgements about what is right for our families, our society and our future.
    Listen to the thoughts of Forrest Maready 

    What do you think about HIS incredible opinion? 

  • Not Settled Nor Trustworthy?

    Science.

    by Ashley Cates.

    When you have studies on one side stating that vaccines do not cause autism, and studies on the other side stating there is a link, which scientific conclusion do you trust?

    In a 2009 meta-analysis of survey data on how many scientists fabricate and falsify research, it was found that almost 2% of scientists admitted to personally fabricating, falsifying, or modifying data or results at least once and almost 34% admitted other questionable research practices. In addition, 14% of scientists surveyed admitted that their colleagues falsified research and 72% admitted their colleagues participated in other questionable practices.

    The authors state:

    “…Misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others. Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.”

    http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article…

    __________________________________________

    But, scientific research is peer-reviewed prior to acceptance and publication in prestigious medical journals. How can this be?

    “At the BMJ we did several studies where we inserted major errors into papers that we then sent to many reviewers. Nobody ever spotted all of the errors. Some reviewers did not spot any, and most reviewers spotted only about a quarter. Peer review sometimes picks up fraud by chance, but generally it is not a reliable method for detecting fraud because it works on trust.”

    – Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

    __________________________________________

    Unfortunately, it’s more than just flawed, the entire system is corrupt:

    Nobel Prize winner Sydney Brenner (for Physiology or Medicine in 2002) spoke of the peer review system in an interview in 2014:

    “It’s corrupt in many ways, in that scientists and academics have handed over to the editors of these journals the ability to make judgment on science and scientists… it puts the judgment in the hands of people who really have no reason to exercise judgment at all. And that’s all been done in the aid of commerce, because they are now giant organizations making money out of it.”

    http://kingsreview.co.uk/…/how-academia-and-publishing-are…/

    __________________________________________

    Sadly, science is wrought with conflicts of interest.

    “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

    – Dr. Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet, regarding a symposium on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research held by the Academy of Medical Sciences.

    http://www.thelancet.com/…/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%296069…

    __________________________________________

    Unfortunately, the Centers for Disease Control, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, etc. are all making recommendations and decisions based on this corrupt science:

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

    – Dr. Marcia Angell, physician and editor in chief of the New England Medical Journal.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964337/

    __________________________________________

    In the end, always consider the source.
    Yes, it matters. No, it’s not a conspiracy theory.

    Ask the question: Who benefits from this research, and who funded it?

    The pharmaceutical industry maintains major influence over our most prized institution – unbiased discovery, education, and advancement, for the benefit of all.

    For the industry, science has become a business tool for increasing profit, rather than an unbiased exploratory process. We need REAL science. Unbiased science. Science that doesn’t seek to profit from the results.

    Do you put your faith in an industry which only profits when you are sick?

    #marchforscience #exvaxxer

    Original Article/Note found on Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/ashleynelsoncates/posts/1371432082878424
    Post Script:
    Ashley Cates “My point has never been that we can’t trust science. It’s that we can’t trust industry-funded science. Anyone who seeks to profit off of the scientific results should not be funding any science whatsoever. Independent scientific research is usually pretty informative and I think much more trustworthy – there’s no financial incentive or pressure for a desired result. And this is the science I usually share.”

  • Science behind Baceteria, Viruses and Vaccines

    Humanity lives synergistically with pathogens (Bacteria and Viruses). They actually have a purpose.

    MUMPS: Researchers investigated whether mumps might engender immunity to ovarian cancer through antibodies against the cancer-associated antigen MUC1 abnormally expressed in the inflamed parotid gland.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951028/

    MEASLES: Albonico et al found that adults are significantly protected against non-breast cancers — genital, prostate, gastrointestinal, skin, lung, ear-nose-throat, and others — if they contracted measles (odds ratio, OR = 0.45), rubella (OR = 0.38) or chickenpox (OR = 0.62) earlier in life. [Med Hypotheses 1998; 51(4): 315-20].

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9824838/

    MEASLES: Montella et al found that contracting measles in childhood reduces the risk of developing lymphatic cancer in adulthood [Leuk Res 2006; 30(8): 917-22].

    http://www.lrjournal.com/art…/S0145-2126(05)00466-2/abstract

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16406019/

    MEASLES: Alexander et al found that infection with measles during childhood is significantly protective — it cuts the risk in half — against developing Hodgkin’s disease (OR = 0.53) [Br J Cancer 2000; 82(5): 1117-21].

    http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v82/n5/full/6691049a.html

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10737396/

    Measles to the Rescue: A Review of Oncolytic Measles Virus.
    MV Clinical trials are producing encouraging preliminary results in ovarian cancer, myeloma and cutaneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the outcome of currently open trials in glioblastoma multiforme, mesothelioma and squamous cell carcinoma are eagerly anticipated.
    Aref S, et al. Viruses. 2016.

    http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/10/294

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086626/

    MEASLES: Glaser et al also found that lymph cancer is significantly more likely in adults who were not infected with measles, mumps or rubella in childhood [In J Cancer 2005; 115(4): 599-605].

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.20787/full

    COMMON INFECTIONS: Gilham et al found that infants with the least exposure to common infections have the greatest risk of developing childhood leukemia [BMJ 2005; 330: 1294].

    http://www.bmj.com/content/330/7503/1294

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15849205/

    EARLY EXPOSURE TO INFECTIONS:Urayama et al also found that early exposure to infections is protective against leukemia [Int J Cancer 2011; 128(7): 1632-43]. Read more….

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.25752/full

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21280034/

    CHICKEN POX (VARICELLA Canniff J., Donson A.M., Foreman N.K., Weinberg A. Cytotoxicity of glioblastoma cells mediated ex vivo by varicella-zoster virus-specific T cells. J Neurovirol. 2011;17(October (5)):448–454. [PubMed] Canniff et al. reported an association between those individuals with clinical or laboratory evidence of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection and lower risk of glioma.A glioma is a type of tumor that starts in the brain or spine. It is called a glioma because it arises from glial cells.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759842/…

    CHICKEN POX IN CHILDHOOD: Silverberg J.I., Kleiman E., Silverberg N.B., Durkin H.G., Joks R., Smith-Norowitz T.A. Chickenpox in childhood is associated with decreased atopic disorders, IgE, allergic sensitization, and leukocyte subsets. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(February (1):50–58. [PubMed Silverberg et al. also reported that wild-type VZV infection up to 8 years of age was found to be protective against atopic disorders that are thought to be “mediated by suppression of IgE production and allergic sensitization, as well as altered leukocyte distributions. Chicken Pox references taken from Goldman, King STUDY

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/j.1399-3038.2011.0122…/full

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22017482/

    INFLUENZA – Influenza Virus Infection Elicits Protective Antibodies and T Cells Specific for Host Cell Antigens Also Expressed as Tumor-Associated Antigens: A New View of Cancer ImmunosurveillanceUzoma K. Iheagwara, Pamela L. Beatty, Phu T. Van, Ted M. Ross, Jonathan S. Minden, and Olivera J. Fin

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006373/

    THIS IS COOL!

    Measles virus for cancer therapy
    Stephen J. Russell, M.D., Ph.D. and Kah Whye Peng, Ph.D.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926122/

  • Immunity Natural vs Artificial

    Immunity Natural vs Artificial


    HFI: Researching the science behind immunity? This video series goes IN DEPTH into the human attempt for artificial immunity via vaccinations. Take time to listen and absorb information Dr Raymond Obomsawin. He is a brilliant mind who gathered scientific studies and research to help parents make informed choices about vaccinations for themselves and their family.

    INDEPTH. The science behind Immunity, Infectious Disease, and Vaccination

    Published on Aug 21, 2013

    Life Science Seminars International
    Why do vaccines pose serious physical, mental, and behavioral dangers in humans? Get a historical overview of human attempts to create immunity artificially via vaccination and explore the issues surrounding these artificial attempts to protect human health.
    http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/c/192/Li…
    http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/14…

    This article originally appeared at: https://youtu.be/KtN0PMJOOjM?t=27m39s.

  • TOXIC Neonicotinoids EPA Approved Bee Killer

    TOXIC Neonicotinoids EPA Approved Bee Killer

    HFI: Important!! Neonicotinoids Do not, I repeat, do not buy plants treated with Neonicotinoids. Bees take the pollen back to the hive and feed it to the brood.  This is the number one cause of colony collapse! They are banned in Europe! Avoid these toxins and Save the bees! Neonicotinoids are also known to kill our earthworms. 
    Save our food supply. Purchase local seeds and plants from local farmers and nurseries. Better yet save your own and grow at home!

    Toxic ‘witches brew’ of pesticides and fungicides is killing Up To Half Of America’s Bees

    This headline appeared in the Popular Science Magazine in March of 2013. Now four years later, BEES have been added to the endangered species list in the United States.Bees don’t just make honey, remember, but pollinate a ton of what we eat–as much as a fourth of it. That could lead to less food and higher food prices.

    In 2013 Quartz published these frightening facts:
     

    …The mysterious mass die-off of honey bees that pollinate $30 billion worth of crops in the US has so decimated America’s apis mellifera population that one bad winter could leave fields fallow. Now, a new study has pinpointed some of the probable causes of bee deaths and the rather scary results show that averting beemageddon will be much more difficult than previously thought.

    Scientists had struggled to find the trigger for so-called Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) that has wiped out an estimated 10 million beehives, worth $2 billion, over the past six years. Suspects have included pesticides, disease-bearing parasites and poor nutrition. But in a first-of-its-kind study published today in the journal PLOS ONE, scientists at the University of Maryland and the US Department of Agriculture have identified a witch’s brew of pesticides and fungicides contaminating pollen that bees collect to feed their hives. The findings break new ground on why large numbers of bees are dying though they do not identify the specific cause of CCD, where an entire beehive dies at once.

    When researchers collected pollen from hives on the east coast pollinating cranberry, watermelon and other crops and fed it to healthy bees, those bees showed a significant decline in their ability to resist infection by a parasite called Nosema ceranae. The parasite has been implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder though scientists took pains to point out that their findings do not directly link the pesticides to CCD. The pollen was contaminated on average with nine different pesticides and fungicides though scientists discovered 21 agricultural chemicals in one sample. Scientists identified eight ag chemicals associated with increased risk of infection by the parasite.

    Most disturbing, bees that ate pollen contaminated with fungicides were three times as likely to be infected by the parasite. Widely used, fungicides had been thought to be harmless for bees as they’re designed to kill fungus, not insects, on crops like apples.

    BEES ADDED TO US ENDANGERED SPECIES LIST FOR THE FIRST TIME

    Toxins affect EVERYTHING! Bees & Earthworms

    Neonicotinoids : From Beecharmers.org

    Below is a summary of the chemical and brand names of the commonly used neonicotinoids. These are toxic to our honey bees. We are asking growers who are using these materials and who are dependent on honey bees for pollination, not to use these products currently until more research is done .
    Actara, Platinum, Helix, Cruiser, Adage, Meridian, Centric, Flagship, Poncho, Titan, Clutch, Belay, Arena, Confidor, Merit, Admire, Ledgend, Pravado, Encore, Goucho, Premise, Assail, Intruder, Adjust and Calypso (This list was generated by The Senior Extension Associate at Penn State)
    Never use a neonicotinoid pesticide on a blooming crop or on blooming weeds if honey bees are present.

    • The use of a neonicotinoid pesticide pre-bloom, just before bees are brought onto a crop is not recommended. If one of these materials MUST be used pre-bloom (for example at pink in apples), select a material that has a lower toxicity to bees (acetamiprid or thiacloprid) and apply only when bees are not foraging, preferably late evening.
    • Do not apply these materials post bloom (example petal fall) until after the bees have been
    removed from the crop. For the full report clicke here.

    Preserving the Bees: 

    •  *In the United States, a group of beekeepers from North Dakota is taking Bayer to court after losing thousands of honeybee colonies in 1995, during a period when oilseed rape in the area was treated with imidacloprid. A third of honeybees were killed by what has since been dubbed colony collapse disorder.
    • *The Dutch government has banned Imidaclprid completely in open-air situations. The product evidently also leaves a residue in the soil that completely destroys the Earthworm population that is so important to soil conservation. It also gets into weeds and other crops grown in the same ground. French beekeepers maintain they have lost thousands of colonies to this pesticide and a sister organo-phosphate called Fibronil produced by Aventis and are calling on the French government to remove both products from the market.
    • *PARIS – “Gaucho”, a broad-spectrum insecticide made by the Germany-based chemical giant Bayer, was banned in France in 1999 due to its toxicity to bees and other forms of life — including humans — but its replacement, “Regent”, from another German giant, BASF, is just as dangerous say beekeepers and biologists.

  • Natural Immunity and Vaccination

    Natural Immunity and Vaccination

    To understand the false marketing campaign behind ‘herd immunity’ you must understand NATURAL immunity. Dr. Obukhanych explains the clear science behind the radical difference.

    Published on Oct 30, 2013

    Dr Tetyana Obukhanych is the author of Vaccine Illusion: How Vaccination Compromises Our Natural Immunity and What We Can Do to Regain Our Health. In her book, she presents a view on vaccination that is radically different from mainstream theories
    Dr Tetyana Obukhanych, has studied immunology in some of the world’s most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. and Stanford University in California.

    This article originally appeared at: https://youtu.be/8h66beBrEpk.

    More on Herd Immunity can be found at : Let’s Talk About Herd Immunity

  • Our kids vaccines contaminated with LEAD

    Our kids vaccines contaminated with LEAD

    ITALIAN SCIENTISTS FIND UNEXPECTED CONTAMINANTS IN ALL PEDIATRIC VACCINES, INCLUDING LEAD, STAINLESS STEEL, TUNGSTEN, IRON, AND CHROMIUM

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination 

    International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, January 2017, Dr. Antonietta M. Gatti, Stefano Montanari

    Summary: Scientists found contaminants in all vaccines that are not listed on the label of the vaccines. “The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non bio-compatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.”


    Vaccine Safety a Concern

    Vaccine safety appears to be a concern of new US President Donald Trump. Early in his presidency he tapped Robert Kennedy Jr to head up a vaccine safety commission. Media decried that thought.
    Parents and doctors alike ask what harm could come from independent studies on the safety of our children’s vaccines?
    Why WOULDN’T anyone want to make sure what we are injecting into their developing bodies is safe?

    Feb 14, 2017 in WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new organization launched calling themselves “Vaccine Safety Commission”, a nonprofit organization that was formed by “concerned scientists, doctors, journalists, and parents.” For now, the group has chosen to remain anonymous, but I certainly hope that changes soon. The group has no formal affiliation to either Robert F. Kennedy or President Trump, but wholeheartedly endorses the formation of a Vaccine Safety Commission, and claims to be actively seeking additional members.

    • New nonprofit organization launched today, Vaccine Safety Commission
    • They list 50 studies the AAP “forgot” to send President Trump
    • Scientists, Doctors, and Journalists supporting the formation of a true, independent commission to study vaccine safety

    RESOURCES:

    https://medium.com/@jbhandley/vaccine-safety-commission-50-studies-the-aap-failed-to-send-president-trump-bdc03a4ca8c9

  • Confirmed! Fluoride is a Neuro-toxin. SUMMARY OF THE SCIENCE

    Confirmed! Fluoride is a Neuro-toxin. SUMMARY OF THE SCIENCE

    New York – December 30, 2016 – The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) has released a new video: “Fluoride & The Brain” that should be the ideal tool to help educate dentists, doctors, scientists, decision-makers, the media, and friends on the scientific evidence that fluoride can damage the brain and has the potential to lower IQ in children.

    HFI: Did you know that SOME SCHOOLS across the U.S. administer FLUORIDE TREATMENTS to kids in the classroom with (and without) parental permission? Have you checked with your school?
    Fluoride is in the public water system in Idaho. Does this concern you?

    This 30 minute presentation is available to watch for free.

    Michael Connett explains the fluoride-brain connection in language most people can understand.

    Fluoride’s ability to damage the brain is one of the most active areas of fluoride research today.
    Over 300 studies have found that fluoride is a neurotoxin (a chemical that can damage the brain). This research includes:

    • Over 100 animal studies showing that prolonged exposure to varying levels of fluoride can damage the brain, particularly when coupled with an iodine deficiency, or aluminum excess;
    • 50 human studies linking moderately high fluoride exposures with reduced intelligence;
    • 45 animal studies reporting that mice or rats ingesting fluoride have an impaired capacity to learn and/or remember;
    • 12 studies (7 human, 5 animal) linking fluoride with neurobehavioral deficits (e.g., impaired visual-spatial organization);
    • 3 human studies linking fluoride exposure with impaired fetal brain development.

    Based on this accumulating body of research, several prestigious reviews — including a report authored by the U.S. National Research Council, a meta-analysis published by a team of Harvard scientists, and a review published in The Lancet— have raised red flags about the potential for low levels of fluoride to harm brain development in some members of the population.

    In November 2016, FAN, together with a coalition of environmental, medical and health groups served the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with a Petition calling on the Agency to ban the addition of fluoridation chemicals to public water supplies due to the risks these chemicals pose to the brain.

    This article originally appeared at: http://fluoridealert.org/articles/fluoride-the-brain/.
  • FLU SHOT?  Not for my kids!

    FLU SHOT? Not for my kids!

    THE FLU SHOT IS NOT TESTED FOR SAFETY IN CHILDREN

    Despite what your health practitioner will say as they attempt to convince you to get the flu vaccine, the shot has not been evaluated for cancer risks, safety in pregnant women, or safety in various age range categories for children. 
    Once again a small bit of research reveals that vaccine science is not clear. 

    Vaccine package insert warnings which read as follows:
    • Flubok: “Safety and effectiveness in children 3 years to less than 18 years of age have not been established.”
    • Flucelvax: “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in children less than 18 years of age.”
    • Fluzone: “Safety and effectiveness in children below the age of 6 months have not been established.”
    • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”
    • FluLaval: “Safety and effectiveness in children younger than 3 years have not been established.”
    • Afluria: “…not approved for use in children less than 5 years of age.”
    • Fluarix: “…not approved for use in children younger than 3 years.”
    • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”

    READ THE LABEL!  
    Influenza vaccines contain three or four influenza virus strains and are produced using either chicken eggs or genetically-engineered dog kidney. Vaccine ingredients may include: formaldehyde, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, non-human protein and genetic materials, polysorbate 80, Thimerosal, MSG (monosodium glutamate), all of which are considered poisonous to humans.

    All Influenza Vaccines Clearly State:
    “This vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” 
     – see section 13.1 in all manufacturers inserts listed on left

    To make your research easier links are provided so that you can
    READ IT FOR YOURSELF
    Manufacture Package Inserts – Influenza
    Afluria Package Insert (injectable)
    bioCSL Inc.

    FluLaval Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmilthKline
       
    Fluad Package Insert
    Novartis (Seqirus)

    FluMist Quadrivalent Package Insert (intranasal)
    MedImmune, Inc.
       
    Fluarix Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluvirin Package Insert (injectable)

    Novartis (Seqirus) Vaccines

    Fluarix Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluzone Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur  

    Flublok Package Insert (injectable)
    Protein Sciences Corporation

    Fluzone High-Dose Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur
       
    Flucelvax Package Insert (injectable)
    Novartis

    Fluzone Intradermal Package Insert
    Sanofi Pasteur
       
    FluLaval Package Insert (injectable)
    GlaxoSmithKline

    Fluzone Quadrivalent Package Insert (injectable)
    Sanofi Pasteur
     
    RESEARCH & RETHINK VACCINES.