Tag: transparency

  • Oppose SB1380 A Threat to Transparency and Accountability

    CTA SB 1380 MUST BE STOPPED‼️ We have 1 chance to stop this bill. It will likely be heard on the house floor on Monday. This bill creates a new agency It expands beyond legislative or judicial oversight with the ombudsman for health and human services appointed by the governor (not elected by the people). This bill threatens transparency and accountability by allowing the ombudsman to operate in secrecy, shielded from public scrutiny. Act now to defend our rights and demand accountability from our representatives.

    Send an email today urging them to oppose SB 1380 and protect our freedoms!

    HFI is very familiar with the problem we face with Idaho CPS and helps parents regularly. Educational information attached below.

    ~CPS is used as the stick to coerce parents into medical treatments including vaccines.
    ~CPS medically kidnaps our children if we decide to explore other treatment options.
    ~CPS steals our children under the guise of medical neglect when the parent takes their babies into the hospital for care.

    ***This is outrageous and should not be tolerated but SB 1380 is not the solution and will only create more of a problem.

    You should read the 5 page bill.

    We will focus on a few key points.

    1.) SB 1380 grows the executive branch by creating a new self-governing agency with an ombudsman for health and human services appointed by the governor. See 67-2601. It will operate independently of the legislature, the courts, the H&W Dept and any other state agency or department. See 56-1902 (1).

    2.) SB 1380 protects the ombudsman from redress by the citizens of Idaho. See 56-1906.
    It states that an individual who willfully interferes with or impedes the ombudsman in the performance of their duties will face a fine of up to $1,000 and up to 6 months in jail.
    They may explain this away as being intended to not hinder the work of the ombudsman but will undoubtedly be used against the people to impede the exercise of our 1st amendment rights.

    3.) SB 1380 allows the ombudsman to operate in secrecy and makes them untouchable by protecting them from public records requests. See 56-1908.

    ❌You can’t fix BAD government with MORE government.

    🤔Why is a supposedly conservative legislature attempting to grow the executive branch?

    Read the bill:
    👉🏼 https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2024/legislation/S1380/

    IFF rates the bill -3:
    👉🏼 https://idahofreedom.org/senate-bill-1380-health-social-services-ombudsman/

    Email ALL of the Representatives:
    👉🏼 https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/2024-representatives/

    CPS info including Miste’s presentation about what to do if CPS shows up at your door:
    👉🏼 https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/the-corrupt-business-of-cps

    To avoid spam filters on the Legislative email system, it’s best to email representatives in groups. Simply compose your email, make duplicate copies, and send each copy to different groups of legislators. This ensures they receive your email without it being caught in a spam filter.

    GROUP1

    JAlfieri@house.idaho.gov, CAllgood@house.idaho.gov, KAndrus@house.idaho.gov, VBar@house.idaho.gov, SBerch@house.idaho.gov, MBlanksma@house.idaho.gov, JBoyle@house.idaho.gov, MBundy@house.idaho.gov, NBurns@house.idaho.gov, 

    GROUP 2

    DCannon@house.idaho.gov, RCheatum@house.idaho.gov, SChew@house.idaho.gov, mwilson@house.idaho.gov, LClow@house.idaho.gov, JCornilles@house.idaho.gov, BCrane@house.idaho.gov, JCrane@house.idaho.gov, CDixon@house.idaho.gov, SDixon@house.idaho.gov

    GROUP 3

    MDurrant@house.idaho.gov, BEhardt@house.idaho.gov, JEhlers@house.idaho.gov, Erickson@house.idaho.gov, RFurniss@house.idaho.gov, SGalaviz@house.idaho.gov, JGallagher@house.idaho.gov, JGannon@house.idaho.gov, DGarner@house.idaho.gov, BGreen@house.idaho.gov,

    GROUP 4

    CHandy@house.idaho.gov, DHawkins@house.idaho.gov, DHealey@house.idaho.gov, THill@house.idaho.gov, JHoltzclaw@house.idaho.gov, WendyHorman@house.idaho.gov,  MKingsley@house.idaho.gov, TLambert@house.idaho.gov, GLanting@house.idaho.gov,  DManwaring@house.idaho.gov,

    GROUP 5

    CMathias@house.idaho.gov, LMcCann@house.idaho.gov, RMendive@house.idaho.gov, SMickelsen@house.idaho.gov, SMiller@house.idaho.gov, BMitchell@house.idaho.gov, JMonks@house.idaho.gov, MMoyle@house.idaho.gov, CNash@house.idaho.gov, LNecochea@house.idaho.gov, JNelsen@house.idaho.gov, JPalmer@house.idaho.gov, JPetzke@house.idaho.gov, DPickett@house.idaho.gov, 

    GROUP 6

    EPrice@house.idaho.gov, BRaybould@house.idaho.gov, JRaymond@house.idaho.gov, JRedman@house.idaho.gov, NRoberts@house.idaho.gov, IRubel@house.idaho.gov, MSauter@house.idaho.gov, HScott@house.idaho.gov, CShepherd@house.idaho.gov, BSkaug@house.idaho.gov, JTanner@house.idaho.gov
    JVanderWoude@house.idaho.gov, JWeber@house.idaho.gov, JoshWheeler@house.idaho.gov, TWisniewski@house.idaho.gov, KWroten@house.idaho.gov, JYamamoto@house.idaho.gov, JYoung@house.idaho.gov,

  • Public Demands Transparency & Action on Glyphosate-Contaminated Food and Vaccines

    The high-stakes game continues for Bayer AG and its deeply troubled investment Monsanto as they struggle to regain public trust and marketshare. For those who entered this ongoing saga at any point in the timeline recently, a quickening of events can be witnessed. For years people have been demanding food transparency with respect to glyphosate contamination from producer to regulator to retailer only to be pushed aside and ignored. It appears the pressure has now hit a critical mass and is beginning to fracture the old paradigm at its most vulnerable points.

    Almost a month out from the $289M San Francisco Roundup-cancer verdict and further lawsuits are continuing to pile on. As thousands line-up

    throughout the US seeking compensation and justice for their cancer allegedly being triggered by Roundup, a new legal angle has emerged and activated. It was last week the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG) released their study promptly picked up by major media outlets globally. The group, having a long history of spotlighting the dangers of glyphosate, discovered amounts of the widely used herbicide in thirty-one out of 45 tested products. The glyphosate levels, found in popular oats, granolas and snack bars, have levels higher than what some scientists consider safe for children. Shortly after EWG’s study findings were released, Reuters reported, “General Mills Inc has been hit with a proposed class action lawsuit claiming the company failed to warn consumers about traces of the weedkiller glyphosate in its Cheerios cereals.”
    For a few years semi-regular reports have been published alerting consumers about concerning levels of glyphosate found in not only food products but within the vaccine supply given to infants and children. In the past the mainstream media has been silent, however it appears they no longer can be. Will media outlets have the courage to go further and report on how widespread glyphosate contamination has become? Will they begin to spotlight the numerous studies that do show glyphosate causes harm within the human body? 
    Source: EWG, from tests by Eurofin Analytical Laboratories

    New York Senator Chuck Schumer’s office posted a press release pressuring the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to update the public on their two yeas of hidden testing surrounding glyphosate in everyday foods.

    Schumer stated, “I am making it known today that the federal government is in fact investigating this chemical, and I am here today to ask them to provide us all with an update on their work so that concerned parents and consumers can get the answers they seek.”

    The press release goes on to state, “…according to reports on Freedom of Information requests to the FDA and their own submission, that the agency has been testing food samples for the weed killer chemical glyphosate, but that the agency has not released any official update or final report to Congress or the public. In 2016, an FDA spokesman also confirmed the agency study of the chemical to media, but Schumer says he and others are still waiting on results.”

    Maybe Schumer has been a subscriber and reader of the weekly reports from Moms Across America who, in 2016, was demanding for multiagency transparency from US regulators as well as politicians after finding widespread glyphosate contamination in the vaccine supply. Nearly two years ago, MOM wrote,

    “Moms Across America has sent a letter on September 1, 2016 to the FDA, CDC, EPA, NIH, California Department of Health, and Senator Boxer requesting that they make it a priority to test vaccines for glyphosate, recall contaminated vaccines and for the EPA to revoke the license of glyphosate to prevent further contamination. “And in the meantime we call upon our lawmakers to rescind the mandate which forces parents to vaccinate their child in order to attend school, in light of extraordinary new evidence.”

    After not addressing MOM’s original request, a Freedom of Information Act request was sent
    for any and all information the FDA and CDC have exchanged or filed regarding glyphosate in vaccines. The agency’s responses contained redactions on approximately fifty percent of the pages from the FDA while many others were completely blank.

    How has Bayer AG-Monsanto navigated the controversy after their historic trial loss? Monsanto has continually went on record giving press statements defending their untested Roundup product. The company is holding the line claiming their product isn’t cancer-causing despite their internal emails and documents showing they have not done the proper testing. There are numerous studies showing glyphosate does cause harm. In addition,  a lab has done some of the first tests on the entire, synergistic Roundup formulation and reported their findings in early 2018. The researchers found that exposing plants and human cells to the components of Roundup formulations, both mixed and separately, showed “measured toxicity and human cellular endocrine disruption below the direct toxicity experimentally measured threshold.”

    Will Bayer AG simply try to erase all traces of Monsanto as the company’s reputation and failed agricultural technology goes up in smoke? Fox 2 Now St. Louis recently reported that during Bayer’s “Day One” transition of their newly acquire Monsanto division, their priority was to replace the “Monsanto” company signs with “Bayer: Crop Science Division.” 

    In the age of information, it may take more than a change a window dressing for generations of families to forget the growing evidence of Big-Tobacco-level underhandedness that led to illness, diseases and environmental poisoning at the hands of Monsanto. The bottom line is that Bayer AG, at the very least, must now immediately begin to start warning people that their Roundup formulations can cause cancer.

    For years people have been demanding food transparency with respect to glyphosate contamination from producer to regulator to retailer only to

    be pushed aside and ignored. It appears the pressure has now hit a critical mass and is beginning to fracture the old paradigm at its most vulnerable points. If the General Mills lawsuit is viable, will that open another avenue of legal flood gates to sue all other food producers with glyphosate-containing products? Why didn’t food producers proactively implement internal controls to detect and eliminate glyphosate in their products. Why didn’t the FDA do more to regulate the amount of glyphosate in the US food chain when it appeared to have multiple years of data? Where are the other politicians demanding the US regulatory agencies release their unredacted glyphosate testing results from common food products and vaccines.

    More Resources:

    Toxicity of Roundup/Glyphosate in Breakfast Foods

    Glyphosate in Vaccines

    Sign the Petitions Stop Roundup Sold and Sprayed

    Glyphosate Detox

  • 15% of the chemicals in our personal care have NOT been tested for safety

    The science is there. The awareness is not. Let’s talk. This Johnson & Johnson product right here is rated a 10 for carcinogenicity, developmental & reproductive toxicity, and ranks high for allergies & immunotoxocities. We’re bathing babies in cancer causing products and killing their fertility. There is NO ONE testing these products for safety before they go to the shelves. Less than 15% of the chemicals in our personal care and cleaning products have been tested for safety. We think if a product is on a store shelf then it must be safe, right!? Surely, they wouldn’t allow chemicals that cause cancer in products we use on our babies, right!? Wrong! #KNOWBETTER #DOBETTER

    This app is ThinkDirty available for Android and Apple products.

    We also use EWG homeguide to research products BEFORE we go shopping so we know what to look for or ask for if we don’t see it on the shelf. 

    RESOURCES:

    New Chemicals: Sell First. Test later?