For the sake of discussion, pretend that masks actually matter in the spread of Covid. How much difference would they make, quantitatively?
Well, first you need to know the prevalence. If no one is sick there’s nothing to stop. So, for the sake of discussion, let’s assume a high number, let’s say 1%. One in 100 people are sick with Covid.
Someone sick with Covid is likely to be at home in bed for most of their illness. So let’s say that one in the 10 days they might be contagious they are around other people and potentially contagious.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t typically kiss every person I bump into in the grocery store. In other words, just because a person is contagious, doesn’t mean they will actually spread it to someone else. For the sake of discussion, let’s assume that if a person is contagious they could potentially spread it to one in ten of the people they interact with.
Let’s run the numbers so far: 1% x 10% x 10% = one in ten thousand people it might make a difference on any given day.
And by “might make a difference” we are talking if you have a comorbidity of one in twenty odds that you could hospitalized, and one in 140 that you could die from Covid.
So, even with a comorbidity, we are talking one in 200,000 the chance of hospitalization, and one in a million the chance of death.
Geeze, the “vaccine” is 500 times riskier than that.
And these numbers are far smaller for younger people, and people using any modicum of common sense.
And for this, we are littering the oceans with billions of pieces of plastic (far worse than straws), causing depression, loss of businesses, suicides, drug overdoses, and ill health in our population, and propagating an atmosphere of malaise across our society.
Quantitatively, the general use of masks sounds like a dumb idea to me.
Perhaps a publicity stunt gone wrong. The CHI Memorial Hospital in Tennessee broadcasts vaccinating several members of their healthcare management teams. During our live stream of the drug injections at CHI Memorial, Nurse Manager Tiffany Dover while speaking to the media about receiving the drug injection mentioned she started feeling dizzy. SHE FAINTED 17 minutes AFTER SHOOTING UP. Thankfully one of the doctors behind her caught her.
A SECOND Alaska healthcare worker has an allergic reaction to Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine just one day after another staff member at the same hospital went into anaphylactic shock.
Anaphylactic shock is a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction to an allergy from food, medicine, vaccine or even a type of material.
The immune system releases chemicals that flood the body, blood pressure suddenly drops, and airways narrow, which prevents someone from breathing normally.
Symptoms usually occur within minutes and include hives, a weak pulse, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and a swollen tongue or throat.
A second healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered an allergic reaction after getting Pfizer Inc’s coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday.
He experienced symptoms such as eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat, which resolved in an hour after being given Benadryl. His reaction was less serious than another healthcare worker from the same hospital who went into anaphylactic shock on Tuesday.
She is currently hospitalized and it is unclear when she will be discharged. The woman hasno known history of allergies.
Dec 18 updated:
to reveal now a THIRD significant reaction
So this unfortunate soul went to get a medical product injected into their body to SUPPOSEDLY “prevent” them from getting a medical issue only to GET A MEDICAL ISSUE. Oh, and what guarantee do they have that they’re protected? ZERO guarantees!! Fairtrade?
I wonder how many of these instances are occurring that are NOT making it into mainstream media reporting? Hmm.
By the way, wait until this Covid vaccine victim finds out that whatever medical bills they are incurring to address this crisis ARE NOT COVERED by the medical professional that administered the vaccine, the vaccine maker, or the government agency that suggested getting the shot was a good idea!
The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered. It led the U.K.’s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine.
What’s in the Vaccine causing allergic reactions?
After the reactions, the U.K.’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a warning that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not be given the vaccine.
About 32 million Americans have food allergies, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. It’s unknown how many have drug allergies.
No such warning has been issued in the U.S.
In fact, last weekend, the CDC said Americans with serious allergies can be immunized as long as they are monitored for 30 minutes after getting the shot.
However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requiring Pfizer to monitor for anaphylaxis in the U.S. and submit data, according to The New York Times, which first reported the reaction. *So this first wave of vaccine recipients are our most valuable healthcare workers and also participating in safety trials.
The agency has also advised people with allergies to consult with their physicians to ensure they are not allergic to any components of the vaccine.
All right folks, be sure to tell your doctor if you have had an allergic reaction to an injection of the following...
Adverse Reactions Will Determine if the Vaccine is Safe
The CDC assures us they will figure out if the vaccine is safe by using the adverse reaction reporting system. Do you realize what this means?
You will get the shot. If you have an adverse reaction – life-threatening, debilitating or temporary – the CDC will take that into account. You won’t be compensated (nobody is liable if the product isn’t safe). You will suffer for the ‘greater good’. YOU ARE PART OF THE EXPERIMENT.
Perhaps that’s why some healthcare workers are FAKING injections.
“As COVID-19 vaccine is administered in the US., there may be significant adverse events or clusters of adverse events reported. CDC will continue to be vigilant in monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and will be transparent in its communications with the public.” – CDC
Before you read the FDA’s working list of adverse effects they will be monitoring after the release of the covid vaccine, I would like to point out that Harvard researchers were hired by the CDC to analyze the reporting to VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, the passive surveillance system established to monitor vaccine injury/death). Their preliminary findings were that less than 1% of vaccine reactions are ever even reported. After this was relayed to the CDC, all correspondence halted and the project was left to be forgotten. 👀 https://cfvsa.org/less_than_1/
But some of us didn’t forget… And we teach someone every day. And we will keep sharing what we know and keep exposing their attempts to hide the truth.
Below is the working list from the FDA for the adverse effects they plan to monitor for after release of the covid vaccine(s) with the link for you to confirm for yourself. https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
***If your eyes are opening to the insanity of this vaccine logic, please revisit the idea of childhood vaccines. Take a look at the infections, the treatments, the outcomes, the vaccine risks, etc.
For those looking for data on the Moderna Covid 19 vaccine…
-45 participants age 18-55 -20 participants age 56-70 -20 participants age 71 or older -Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here’s the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
That’s a lot of money. There will be an even stronger push for the flu vaccine over the next 8 years to get to that $8 Billion mark.
The average time for manufacturing vaccines and ensuring their availability in the market is approximately 2 years, although flu vaccines are launched in the market in a period of around 6 months. Researchers concluded that various pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies are able to manufacture flu vaccines in a shorter duration of time to become major drivers of the market.
Remember this when they tell you that vaccines aren’t about making money and the manufacturers are doing this out of the goodness of their heart to help the health of humanity.
“According to a research study by PMR, the global flu vaccine market is projected to account for a market value of approximately $8 billion by the end of 2029. Increasing vaccination rates and a focus on preventive instead of reactive methods are expected to drive the growth of the market, according to the study.”
In the past three years, Health Freedom Idaho has grown. HFI has successfully pushed back against liberty stealing statutes and rules, particularly those surrounding vaccines, and in the process made their presence known. Due to this, the media is beginning to take notice.
We have been told that an Idaho Statesman’s investigative reporter, Audrey Dutton, is writing a feature story on Health Freedom Idaho. In addition to requesting information from Health Freedom Idaho leadership directly, she made public records requests to obtain the names and contact information of members and individuals who testified at the recent rules hearings. She has been sending requests for interviews to Health Freedom Idaho members. We want our members to know that Dutton obtained this information through a public records request, NOT from HFI.
Ms. Dutton has publicly stated her bias against parents who opt out of some or all vaccinations. She has determined that the vaccination debate is settled despite hundreds of published peer-reviewed studies that call the safety and efficacy of vaccines into question and despite the demonstrable lies and distortions uttered by vaccine proponents. Her opinion is that parents opposed to some or all vaccination are unjustifiably fearful and/or misinformed.
Public Post from Dutton’s Facebook Page
They like to say, “The science is settled. Vaccines are safe and effective.” But is science ever settled? Ask some real scientists and I’m sure they will tell you that science is never settled but is always ongoing. It takes a great amount of arrogance to claim you know it all and there is nothing more to the story.
Yes, some parents opt out of some or all vaccines for their children and recently their voices have grown stronger as parents educate themselves on the matter and realize their right to direct the upbringing of their children is being threatened all across the nation through draconian legislation and more. Bureaucrats in Idaho have already trampled parental rights codified in Idaho statute.
Why Do Parents Hesitate to Vaccinate?
Ms. Dutton has been emailing Health Freedom Idaho members asking for an interview about their vaccine choices. But why would anyone want to talk with her when she’s already determined that those who decline vaccines are simply doing so out of fear and ignorance. And isn’t a parent’s desire to protect his or her children the most important reason to decline a medical intervention admitted to cause injury and death?
“…many parents in Idaho are opting out of measles/mumps/rubella vaccinations for their children…. The reason they balk usually isn’t religious or because of underlying health problems. It’s fear.”
One is left to wonder the basis of this assumption and why it matters. A parent has the natural right to care for their child as they see fit. They can choose whether to vaccinate or not – for any reason, or for no reason at all. That said, religion, underlying health problems, documented scientific dangers of vaccines, bad experiences of friends and loved ones, and fear are five justifiable reasons to question whether the potential benefits of vaccinating are worth the risks and spiritual objections. – Health Freedom Idaho
REFUSING VACCINES DUE TO THE TOXIC INGREDIENTS
Let’s examine the description (in part) of the MMR II, made by Merck & Co, Inc.
MMR II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) is a live virus vaccine for vaccination against measles (rubeola), mumps, and rubella (German measles). MMR II is a sterile lyophilized preparation of (1) ATTENUVAX (Measles Virus Vaccine Live), a more attenuated line of measles virus, derived from Enders’ attenuated Edmonston strain and propagated in chick embryo cell culture; (2) MUMPSVAX (Mumps Virus Vaccine Live), the Jeryl Lynn (B level) strain of mumps virus propagated in chick embryo cell culture; and (3) MERUVAX II (Rubella Virus Vaccine Live), the Wistar RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts. {1,2}
The growth medium for measles and mumps is Medium 199 (a buffered salt solution containing vitamins and amino acids and supplemented with fetal bovine serum) containing SPGA (sucrose, phosphate, glutamate, and recombinant human albumin) as stabilizer and neomycin…. Each dose of the vaccine is calculated to contain sorbitol, sodium phosphate, sucrose, sodium chloride, hydrolyzed gelatin, recombinant human albumin, fetal bovine serum, other buffer and media ingredients, and approximately 25mcg of neomycin….”
Certainly Ms. Dutton cannot fault loving parents for not wanting to inject those ingredients into their healthy children. There is not a single study proving the safety of injecting all those ingredients. Is Dutton unaware of this fact?
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS TO VACCINES TAINTED BY ABORTION
Many individuals believe vaccines are unclean and defile the temple (their body) because of the injection of modified viruses and bacteria, toxic contaminants and ingredients, and the fact they are cultured on aborted fetal tissues and animal tissues.
What do all these ingredients mean to someone with possible spiritual objections? There are at least two answers to this question. One is the issue of abortion. The other is the multiple biblical references to introducing foreign substances into the body.
Wistar RA 27/3 is listed and referenced with WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts. These are scientific terms and labels. Here is the reality of what they represent:
“The rubella virus clinically named RA273 (R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th fetus, 3=3rd tissue explant) was then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line. A later research paper by Stanley Plotkin [vaccine developer] would reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them.[13A] This means a total of over 80 separate, elective abortions recorded were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.” – Children of God for Life, Vaccines and Abortions.
For patients and parents with strong objections to abortion, this information could weigh heavily on the decision of whether or not to use products that contain aborted fetal tissue such as vaccination. (More information on aborted fetal tissue in vaccines)
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS TO VACCINES TAINTED WITH FOREIGN SUBSTANCES
The second potential religious or spiritual objection relates to foreign substances being introduced into the body. Many believe the Bible commands we not defile the temple God has created.
“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”
The bottom line is vaccines contain a variety of ingredients, both intended and unintended that may toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic and even fertility impairing – from aluminum to formaldehyde to polysorbate 80 to more. It is easy to understand how many parents might view these as a violation of God’s commandment.
DECLINING FOR HEALTH REASONS
To address the issues of underlying health problems and fear, let’s look at more information provided by the vaccine maker.
Hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine….
Do not give MMR II to pregnant females…
Anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to neomycin…
Febrile respiratory illness or other active febrile infection.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
Individuals with blood dyscrasias, leukemia, lymphomas of any type…
Primary and acquired immunodeficiency states…
Individuals with a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency….
PRECAUTIONS:
Adequate treatment provisions, including epinephrine injection (1:1000) should be available for immediate use should an anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction occur.
Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination.
As for any vaccine, vaccination with MMR II may not result in protection….
The health-care provider should provide the vaccine information required to be given with each vaccination to the patient, parent, or guardian.
The health-care provider should inform the patient, parent, or guardian of the benefits and risks associated with vaccination.
Manufacturers report that there are vaccine reactions that include getting measles from the vaccine…and chronic conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, brain swelling, paralysis (temporary or permanent), seizures, lazy eye and more…
The vaccine package insert contains a large section on adverse reactions, some of which include: Panniculitis, atypical measles, vasculitis, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions, arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, encephalitis, encephalopathy, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (adem), transverse myelitis, febrile convulsions, afebrile convulsions or seizures, ataxia, polyneuritis, polyneuropathy, ocular palsies, paresthesia.”
Given all this information, the description, the contraindications, and the precautions, doesn’t some fear seem warranted? And given these risks, does Dutton really think it is her place to declare the science settled, not to mention shame parents for well-placed fear?
REFUSING ADDITIONAL VACCINES AFTER SEEING A LOVED ONE INJURED
Ex-Vaxxer NOT Anti-Vaxxer
This category of people who decline vaccinations, those who were once pro-vaccine only to experience the downside first hand, is likely the largest. Despite the fact that less than one percent of vaccine adverse reactions are reported, there have been over 87,000 reports of adverse reactions to the MMR vaccine to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System from the US and it’s territories. And if only 1% of reactions are reported, there could be as many as 8,700,000 reactions.
Despite official reassurances that vaccine injuries are rare, parents who’ve seen their children hospitalized, stricken with chronic illnesses, paralysis, seizures, or blindness are not going to continue vaccinating. Siblings are spared the potential damage and parents are shamed for being anti-vax when they should receive our sympathy. In reality, they were pro-vaccine until they watched their child suffer and/or die. To add insult to injury, parents are shamed and targeted after vaccination injury by friends, family, and media. Many suffer in silence, raising a child with chronic illness or vaccine-induced physical challenge.
Yes, parents opt-out for religious and moral reasons as well as previous vaccine injuries. Others, faced with the decision of vaccination, having read the medical literature to truly understand the risks and being left with many unanswered questions as vaccines are not subject to the gold standard of double-blind, placebo-controlled rigor, they utilize the vaccine exemptions available through Idaho statute.
For example, parents seeking to find out how many children died in the last measles outbreak in 2019 are redirected to the CDC website. However, after scouring page after page there is NO INDICATION how many U.S. children died in the highly contagious measles outbreak. *It was ZERO for those still looking for the answer.*
Health officials, doctors, and mainstream media claim that 1 in 1000 children will die from measles but before the introduction of the measles vaccine, the reported number was 1 in 10,000. Thanks to public health measures such as sanitation and clean drinking water as well as access to healthcare and nutrition, the rate declined from 13.3 per 100,000 in 1900 to .2 per 100,000 in 1963, before the measles vaccine was introduced. No children have died from measles in the US in last 2 decades.
Some of the many unanswered questions:
Why aren’t vaccines tested according to the gold standard with double-blind placebos?
Why are they the only product that is one size fits all?
If vaccines are so safe, why is there zero manufacturer liability?
Why is the US the only country that gives the Hep B vaccine on the first day of life?
Why is it that after vaccine manufacturers received a liability-free pass, the vaccine schedule exploded to more than 70 doses of vaccines?
Why does the US give the chickenpox vaccine, when the UK and many other countries don’t, because it’s been proven to cause shingles, which is more dangerous?
Many scientists have raised the alarm on the amount of aluminum in vaccines. Why doesn’t the CDC address their concerns?
Why did the ACIP committee recently approve the new Hep B adjuvant despite the safety signal of a myocardial infarction?
Why are all four major vaccine makers (Merck, Sanofi, GSK and Pfizer), who have all been convicted of fraud, given a free pass when it comes to vaccines? Merck created the deadly drug Vioxx and is currently being sued for fraud relating to the Shingles vaccine, MMR vaccine, and Gardasil vaccine, their products are mandated for school entry?
Why do we give 26 vaccines in the first year of life to infants with immature immune systems that cannot even mount an immune response to vaccines?
Where are the safety studies on vaccines that were supposed to be conducted and submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure the vaccine’s safety?
While we are flattered that time and resources are being spent trying to figure out how a small grassroots effort could grow into an outspoken voice of freedom and liberty in Idaho – answer, because we speak the truth and it resonates – these above questions deserve a thorough examination. Is Dutton willing to ask them? What’s more, the only group possessing unfettered influence at the state and national level is the pharmaceutical industry, that is where the focus of investigative reporting should be. Dutton must possess a great deal of cognitive dissonance to believe that the same industry that has paid billions in fines for fraud and is the largest lobbyist and contributor to political campaigns in the nation, is trustworthy when it comes to vaccines even though they have no liability for these products.
Our question is whether an already opinionated journalist like Audrey Dutton is capable of reading the medical literature herself, talking to doctors and scientists with genuine concerns, investigating reported injuries and deaths after vaccines and writing a thought provoking and honest piece of journalism? Or will she simply regurgitate what conflicted officials, doctors, and vaccine stakeholders have fed her? We think educated readers know the answer to those questions.
Our question is whether an already opinionated journalist like Audrey Dutton is capable of reading the medical literature herself, talking to doctors and scientists with genuine concerns, investigating reported injuries and deaths after vaccines and writing a thought-provoking and honest journalism piece? Or will she simply regurgitate what conflicted officials, doctors, and vaccine stakeholders have fed her?
No Shots. No School. NOT TRUE! We have seen over the years how the schools attempt to deny, coerce and bully parents. This is why we started Health Freedom Idaho. Nobody was talking about vaccine exemption forms, parents didn’t know there were exemptions and schools didn’t provide the information. It was Health Freedom Idaho brought a bill from the citizens that got the rules from the health department to line up with statute. We have great news! NOW things are changing in the schools!
We have to keep pushing. This is the time to join Health Freedom Idaho. It’s the time to go to the school board and ask them to be honest.
If you don’t know what your rights are – you are going to lose your right. You only retain the rights you know you have!
We want to continue to spread the word, educate parents and encourage other school districts to stand up for informed consent. HELP US! We want to share resources/information. Help us cover the cost of printing and stamps and the advertising necessary to cross the censorship barrier.
Devout parents who are worried about vaccines object to ingredients containing residual material from pigs or morally reprehensible DNA strands from aborted human fetuses. The New York Times published an article stating, “Top Jewish and Islamic scholars, the Vatican endorse vaccinations.”
Religious authorities have ‘meticulously studied how vaccines are developed and what is in them,’” says the New York Times. “and still have ruled that they do not violate Jewish, Islamic or Catholic law” or Christian traditions. (source)
In reality, State governments agencies target religious leaders. They are fed half-truths via packages of media materials on the topic. They are strongly encouraged to sway their parishioners to comply with state-mandated liability-free medical products that violate the body and contradict scriptures. Avoiding persecution by the state, some religious leaders ‘vigorously endorse vaccination’ and often avoid discussions with dissenting parishioners on the topic. Dodging church conflict, they parrot the public health propaganda of ‘safe and effective’ and ‘greater good’ mantra.
What of the concerns from members who abhor abortion and reject the notion that injecting their healthy child with a disease mixed with toxins created on the body parts of aborted human beings?
Here is a recent example attempting to stem the tide of concern of millions of Christians regarding this issue author Joe Carter writes in the Gospel Coalition Article on vaccinations:
“There are currently no vaccines created by using cells directly taken from the bodies of aborted fetuses. However, there are some vaccines created from cell lines (such as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C6, and WI-26) that were derived from tissue taken from aborted fetuses from the 1960s.”
You could phrase what Joe Carter stated another way: Aborted baby cell strains are used in vaccine development for vaccines currently on the CDC schedule.
Updated to include: The fact is the two COVID 19 being distributed under FDA Emergency Authorization are also manufactured using the aborted fetal cell line HEK-293. Moderna in numerous patents in the fundamental design of mRNA technology and in the original vaccine research, development, production, and testing. (see references here)
Fetal Cells & Vaccines
The screen shot below is taken from the CDC Vaccine Excipient Summary. This table lists substances acknowledged by the vaccine manufacturer “as being contained in the final formulation of each vaccine.” As you can see below in the chicken pox vaccine example, MRC-5, “human diploid cells, including DNA & protein” is included in the list of ingredients.
The bottom line is that vaccine developers used cells of aborted babies to create the vaccines we use today. They were not passive actors, and according to the manufacturers themselves, certain elements from those aborted babies remain present in the vaccines. (See resources below regarding the aborted human DNA is present in vaccinations given today)
According to the CDC these vaccines developed from aborted baby cell strains are:
Adenovirus
DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
Hep A (Havrix)
Hep A (Vaqta)
Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix)
MMR (MMR-II)
MMRV (ProQuad)
Rabies (Imovax)
Varicella (Varivax)
Zoster (Shingles – Zostavax).
There are no U.S. approved vaccine alternatives which were not developed via abortion for Adenovirus, Chickenpox, Hepatitis A, Measles, Mumps, or Rubella.
The cell lines from two dead babies whose parents partnered with the vaccine developers are referred to (dehumanizingly) as MRC-5 (we’ll call him Jack – he was a boy) and WI-38 (we’ll call her Jill, she was a girl). Who were they? Both were about 3 and a half months when they were tragically killed in the womb. We are told Jill’s parents had her killed because they already had too many children, and Jack’s mother had him killed for “psychiatric” reasons. Neither child was deemed to be unhealthy in any way. Here is an MMR vaccine insert which lists Jill (Wi-38) under the description.
These candidates are not selected after the abortion but are meticulously screened prior to. Dr. Stanley Plotkin who developed the Rubella vaccine by using Jill’s cells testifies:
“This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well, and living in Stockholm, presumably. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children. There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.”
Plotkin further testified that in one study alone 76 aborted babieswere similarly used in the preparatory work for a single study he participated in and that he performed medical experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and babies whose mothers were in prison.
Dr Peter McCullough, an Immunologist, wrote the book, The Fetus As Transplant Donor: The Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives, on the methods used in harvesting fetal tissue in Sweden. He writes:
“They would puncture the sac of a pregnant woman at 14 to 16 weeks, put a clamp on the head of the baby, pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the baby’s head and attach a suction machine to remove the brain cells… At 16 to 21 weeks, they would do prostaglandin abortions where a chemical is injected into the womb causing the woman to go into mini-labor and pass the baby. Fifty percent of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys, etc.”
Christian Leaders Claim Abortion Tainted Vaccines Morally Acceptable based on Faulty Assumptions
“The key consideration in whether using currently available vaccines is licit or immoral is whether there is material cooperation with the evil act of abortion. If the abortion was conducted in order to harvest tissues that were to be used for the vaccine, then it would clearly be immoral. But in the case of the vaccines listed above, the abortion was carried out for other reasons and the tissue was acquired post-mortem for the purpose medical research.”
Dr. McCullough and Dr. Plotkin’s testimony make it clear : It’s not like these researchers would just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue.
Catholic Religious Leaders “wash their hands of guilt” and encourage vaccination for ‘common good’
The National Catholic Bioethics Center : “Upon use, one should register a complaint with the manufacturer of the products as an acceptable form of conscientious objection,” the statement says. “This signals opposition to the wider, morally reprehensible practice of using the unborn as little more than research material for science.”
“There is no moral obligation to register such a complaint in order to use these vaccines,” it says, adding that “it should be obvious that vaccine use in these cases does not contribute directly to the practice of abortion since the reasons for having an abortion are not related to vaccine preparation.”
The above statement the Catholic leaders completely ignore the proof that abortions were performed in a manner to specifically use the innocent unborn as spare parts for the intent purpose of the research and manufacturing vaccination.
According to the National Network for Immunization Information (NNii) the reason they used aborted babies is because “human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”
Others, in agreement with McCullough, dispute the need for such practices to develop vaccines.
Either way, if you adopt the CDC vaccination schedule, you can’t avoid abortion tainted vaccinations.
Above is an excerpt of a 5 part series on Christians and Vaccinations that can be found at NewCityTimes.com
Vaccine Exemptions Protect Religious Freedom
RESOURCES: No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:
A portion of the resources from COGforlife.org website (posted her as a redundancy visit their site for the full article)
Quoting:
Importantly, the new data supports NIAID’s approach to a gene-based vaccine for COVID-19 and will also be useful in other vaccine approaches including protein-based vaccines and other nucleic acid or vector-based delivery approaches. NIAID scientists designed the stabilized spike antigen based on previous knowledge obtained from studying other coronavirus spike structures. NIAID and the biotechnology company Moderna, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, are developing a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, which directs the body’s cells to express the spike in its prefusion conformation to elicit an immune response.
And if that is not enough, Moderna’s use of HEK is not new…previous patents in 2015 show its use as well. Use the Find function and type in HEK in the search…it’s listed 76 times.
Since it deals with lung infection (which Covid-19 causes) it seems like a pretty good reference to what they are doing. The use of 293 cells is cited in several places including in the supplementary information. That is linked here:
Which clearly states they are using the Spike protein which some have tried to deny.
Under Vaccine – Quoting:
The mRNA-1273 vaccine candidate, manufactured by Moderna, encodes the S-2P antigen, consisting of the SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein with a transmembrane anchor and an intact S1–S2 cleavage site. S-2P is stabilized in its prefusion conformation by two consecutive proline substitutions at amino acid positions 986 and 987, at the top of the central helix in the S2 subunit.8
And voila – Reference no. 8 at the bottom of the page is none other than:
Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020;367:1260-1263.
When you hear “vaccines are safe and effective” and “the science is settled” — remember those are Public Health slogans meant to create compliance. Scratch the surface of the actual science and you learn fascinating things — such as the fact that researchers are only now just beginning to research the cell lines used to make vaccines to investigate the tumorigenic (cancer-causing) retroviruses they often carry.
What percentage of the rodents were getting tumors and how many of those rodents developed cancer causing tumors. Either way, Wow!
“These include tumorigenic cells such as MDCK and CHO cells (for influenza virus vaccines), 293 and PER.C6 cells (for adenovirus-vectored HIV-1 and other vaccines), and tumor-derived cells such as HeLa cells (for HIV-1 vaccines).”
The FDA article was published in February 2018. However, Dr Judy Mikovits discovered retro viruses in vaccines sometime ago and was jailed for refusing to destroy the data.
July 2018 Independent scientists tested the MMRV vaccine for contaminants. The results were shocking to say the least. Below is an english translation of their article on the finding.
We want to take stock of the situation together with you. Eight months have passed since July 2018 and in these length of time we have achieved extremely satisfying results. We have presented a research program and regarding the vaccines analysis we are able to make a point of reference, with the objectives achieved, those being finalised and those only planned for now.
To begin with, the analyses of 2 compounds for each vaccine have been verifyed by means of standards, using certified control standards with a concentration in the order of micrograms / mL. The compounds we have chosen are among those known for their critical hazard profile. We are talking about a cumulative quantity, a total amount of those recognized as identities and those to be identified, which can be estimated within the order of 50 micrograms / mL, in contrast to the EMA / FDA guidelines.
To begin with, the analyses of 2 compounds for each vaccine have been verified by means of standards, using certified control standards with a concentration in the order of micrograms / mL. The compounds we have chosen are among those known for their critical hazard profile. We are talking about a cumulative quantity, a total amount of those recognized as identities and those to be identified, which can be estimated within the order of 50 micrograms / mL, in contrast to the EMA / FDA guidelines.
These tests have given positive results, therefore they fully confirm the analysis method! The contaminations observed are probably due to different and variable manufacturing process’ phenomena and topics. What has been observed in the course of the studies is an “inter-batches” variation of the composition, which makes us assume that there are some steps along the whole product manufacturing process that are difficult to control.
Summary table showing the results of analyses (Priorix tetra)
Antigens – 3 out of 4 attenuated viruses were identified and sequenced. Rubella was detected in a very low number of copies. Varicella, mumps and measles viruses have higher mutations, probably derived from the attenuation of a large number of minor variants (quasipecies).
Chemical Contaminants (signals) – 115-173 (29-43% known)
Chemical toxins – NO
Protein Contaminants – Sarcoplasmin calcium-binding protein, Actina e Vimentina
Free peptide contaminants – NO
Residual DNA/RNA deriving from cultured cells – Total amount of DNA: 1.7-3.7 μg/dose, the 80% of which was human (Human fetal DNA / RNA from the MRC-5 cell line). Other amount of DNA: chicken
Other microbial contaminants – Proteobacteria, nematode-helminth
Processing residues of genetic material – NO
In-depth information on the vaccines analysed Priorix Tetra (GlaxoSmithKline) 1 Chemical composition profile study 2
Lot #1 and Lot #2 are different in many respects, 115 signals vs. 173 signals detected. A very different amount of known 3 signals 4 (compounds).
What should concern us is yes what we found, that is the known signals, but also and above all those not identifiable because we are in the field of hypotheses and can be anything. (between 29 and 43% is known)
Both lots contain traces that can be quantified between nanograms and micrograms as an indicative order of magnitude, i.e. above the threshold normally defined as residual (below nanograms). This data is important because some compounds are highly toxic, others are known allergens and others are most likely pharmaceutical molecules which, if present in vaccines, must be reported in the data sheet and quantified.
In both batches of product, proteins potentially coming from the purification process, of human and animal origin, have been detected, which can give hypersensitivity and allergy phenomena, especially with boosters, but also autoimmunity due to similarity with human proteins.
Both lots contain traces that can be associated with different antibiotics (some of which are not allowed, e.g. penicillin and cephalosporin derivatives because they are highly allergenic), herbicides, acaricides and morphine metabolites.
Metagenomic Profile Study 5
The metagenomic tests of the vaccine “Priorix Tetra” presented a population of mutant viruses, for each attenuated virus, called quasispecies. Genetic variants of vaccine antigens could significantly alter both the safety of the vaccine and its effectiveness. In addition, there are serious dilemmas not only of a medical and scientific nature but also of an ethical nature; we list below the points that are most relevant to us:
The amount of DNA: The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed in large quantities: 1.7 μg on the first lot and 3.7 μg on the second lot, about 325 times higher than the maximum limit of 10 nanograms and as many as 325,000 times higher than the minimum limit of 10 picograms, limits that EMA told us to refer only to cells that are known for carcinogenic activity. 6-7
DNA size: We have more precisely determined the size of the DNA fragments detected and it has been established that the DNA contained has a molecular weight of 20,000/60,000 bp. This basically means that there are no “fragments” of DNA within this drug, i.e. degraded, but an intact genome, belonging to a male human being, confirmed by the comparison between the fetal DNA of the vaccine
and that of the cell line MRC-5 used for the production of the vaccine.
Non-detection of rubella virus: with the level of sequencing used for screening, it was not possible to detect rubella virus. Since there was doubt that this was an error in the procedure used, the level of sequencing was increased significantly to a very high depth (260 million sequences produced). ln this way the rubella virus was detected in 114 copies, equal to 0.00004% of the total of the sequences and through a manual reading of the sequences it was possible to eliminate any source of error of the software used and confirm definitively the (minimum) presence of rubella in the sample. However, this procedure has also made it possible to identify the adventitious viruses present in low copy numbers, and what has been seen is that the number of copies of the adventitious viruses exceeds that of rubella virus.
So there were two other very important issues to be resolved:
1. Is the rubella in the vaccine in sufficient quantity to produce an immunogenic effect or can it be considered subthreshold (i.e. an adventitious contamination)?
2. Are the adventitious viruses really present? If so, can they be dangerous?
As far as point 1) is concerned, we can strongly question the ability of the attenuated rubella virus to act as an immunogenic antigen, for the negligible quantity and for the attenuation that further weakens its effectiveness. This aspect needs to be investigated because there is a real risk that there are lots of vaccines on the market that do not immunize and are therefore not effective, not containing what is stated in the technical data sheet.
As regards point 2) is concerned, or the presence of adventitious viruses: to confirm it, it was necessary to check the sequences one by one manually using a different software (BLAST). It was thus possible to confirm the presence of the following contaminating retroviruses: 8
Human endogenous retrovirus K – 32 sequences
Equine infectious anemia virus – 2 sequences
Avian leukosis virus – 2 sequences
HERV-H/env62 – 4 sequences
These viruses are known to be adventitious vaccine contaminants and are known to be potentially dangerous, which is why manufacturers are required to verify that they are completely absent from the vaccine.
It follows that this in-depth analysis in this vaccine confirms two nonconformities on efficacy and safety:
The presence of rubella in a very low number of copies (subthreshold)
The presence of potentially dangerous adventitious viruses which certifies that there is no adequate control on vaccines because if there were, these elements would have been detected.
Remember the EMA guidelines 9-10-11 which state that reads of “foreign” viruses must be ABSENT so not even 1 copy is allowed. In addition, the presence of a non-residual quantity of human fetal DNA is reconfirmed, so as to make this impurity a real constituent of the vaccine, which should be reported in the technical data sheet and quantified.
By “known” it is meant that the signals relating to a compound with a given molecular weight, present in the databases, generate one or more possible associations with known chemical structures.
the mass spectrum represents the relative abundance of ions as a function of their mass/charge ratio; a compound can generate more ions and therefore more signals, in particular the higher the molecular weight of the molecule the more signals it generates.
Deisher TA, Doan NV, Koyama K, Bwabye S. Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70. PubMed PMID: 26103708.
Jarzyna P, Doan NV, Deisher TA. Insertional mutagenesis and autoimmunity induced disease caused by human fetal and retroviral residual toxins in vaccines. Issues Law Med. 2016 Fall;31(2):221-234. PubMed PMID: 29108182.
Unavoidably Unsafe is Unacceptable. We do NOT consent in fact, we dissent.
What product has grown from approximately $1 billion in revenue in 2001 to $27 billion in 2009 and now $59.2 billion projected for 2020?
This product also enjoys 100% liability protection.
This same product does not have to dip into revenue to fund a program to pay for injuries it creates (but is not liable for).
Do you know what I’m talking about? One guess. Vaccines.
Simply put, no pharmaceutical executive is weighing the cost vs. benefit of creating a safer vaccine. Or losing sleep over a “hot lot.” No doctor is worrying about how long the Gardasil vaccine was tested for safety, or its horrible track record. Not. Their. Problem.
Congress, in 1986, erased that worry from their balance sheet. So you’ve got an industry making a TON of money from a product that has 100% liability protection. And that protection extends to the folks that administer those vaccines.
You see, in the 1980s a lot of kids were having adverse reactions to the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine. Lots of lawsuits were being filed against docs and vaccine manufacturers. This caused the pharmaceutical industry to make noises about pulling out of the vaccine market, and the alarm bells rang that the nation’s health and safety were at risk.
Why were vaccine manufacturers getting ready to take their ball and go home? Because vaccines fall into a class of products considered “unavoidably unsafe.” I am not kidding you. This “unavoidable” word comes from the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act itself “products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe.” So they TRIED, but sorry, they just can’t come up with vaccines that are safe enough that their risk department will allow them to sell them. Because a HUGE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY sees that even THEY do not have enough money to cover all the expense of fighting and paying injured vaccine recipients.
This is an industry that today spends over $200,000,000 A YEAR in lobbyists. Which puts it way ahead of the oil industry in terms of lobbyist expense. (source)
So the Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (that title alone points to fact that vaccines can injure children) in 1986. This releases all manufacturers and administers of vaccines from all liability from any injury caused by a vaccine.
Then an interesting thing started happening . . .
It’s not about our health – its about their wealth.
HPV vaccine is injecting 1,500 mcg of aluminum over a period of less than a year via 3 doses of Gardasil 9.
The trials statistics reflect there is the potential of 2,300 serious adverse events to try and prevent 7.9 cases of cervical cancer. Adverse event reports show this vaccine is devastating. 61,552 cases of vaccine injury from the HPV vaccine. That’s more than the total number of cervical cancer in the United States in any given year.
The Risk of Cancer has been low and not decreased significantly after vaccine marketing
The proven way to prevent cancer is early detection. Because precancerous lesions found by Pap smears can be treated and cured before they develop into cancer, and because cervical cancer is often detected before it becomes advanced, the incidence and death rates for this disease are relatively low.
*According to data for the period from 2003 through 2007, the incidence rate for cervical cancer was 8.1 cases per 100,000 women per year in the United States. 10 years later, after the advent of the vax the rate averages at 7.8 per 100,000.
The mortality rate 10 years ago was 2.4 deaths per 100,000 women per year. In 2010, an estimated 12,200 women in the United States will be diagnosed with cervical cancer, and an estimated 4,210 will die of the disease.
In 2016, the death rate averages 2.3.
This chart created by the CDC does NOT show a significant decline in cancer deaths even though vaccines were introduced in 2004, 2009 and 2014 with that implied they would reduce the risk.
Notice the above rates have not decreased with any great significance even though the CDC reports that 6 in 10 girls and 5 in 10 boys are getting the vaccine series.
The Risk of the new vaccine.
For the first time, Merck has disclosed what may indeed be close to the true rate of serious adverse events people are suffering after the use of Gardasil and will probably continue to suffer if they consent to using Gardasil 9. The only difference would be that the rates may be higher when used in the general population because certain at-risk groups are excluded from clinical trial participation but not from vaccination programs.
2.3-2.5% doesn’t sound that bad until you compare apples to apples. Cervical cancer rates are always quoted as # per 100,000. Given the above information, for every 100,000 people using Gardasil 9 there would be 2,300 serious adverse events. The cervical cancer diagnosis rate in the United States is 7.9/100,000.
What health official in their right mind is willing to anticipate 2,300 serious adverse events to try and prevent 7.9 cases of cervical cancer?
Keep in mind that the cost of vaccinating 100,000 people is around $30 million ($100 per injection, 3 injections). This doesn’t even begin to address the cost of treating 2,300 serious adverse events, the emotional, physical and financial expense to families and the cost to society via the lost productivity of the injured.
*Men do not get cervical cancer – the vac is recommended for boys 9 years old. Could that be because it’s one of the most profitable products for manufacturers?
All About Profit
The rise in the number of mergers and acquisitions and strategic collaborations are estimated to offer lucrative opportunities for the market players in the next few years. Some of the key players operating in the vaccines market across the globe are Merck & Co., Inc., CSL Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Janssen Pharmaceutical Company, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi Pasteur SA, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Serum Institute of India Ltd, Emergent BioSolutions Inc.,And Novavax AB.
Gardasil 9 increases aluminum content There is absolutely no excuse for exposing young women and men to this level of risk for a vaccine that provides nothing other than promises of results far down the road.
Oncology Dietitian Exposes Fraud in CDC’s HPV Vaccine Effectiveness Study
Additional Articles: