Tag: vaccine

  • Kids Vaccinated with Flu Mist Are Spreading Disease

    After seeing a 2% drop in vaccine sales for flu, the ACIP panel brought back the ineffective FluMist live virus multi-strand flu vaccines. It was so ineffective last time it was pulled mid season because it hardly worked. This time doctors won’t know for sure if it works better than before — or better than other vaccine options — until it’s widely used again during an actual flu season. They just want your family to participate in their experiment. More astonishing is they are aware that this vaccine has the innate ability to expose EVERYONE around the vaccinated individual with multiple strains of the flu for almost month. Why would the agency designed to ‘control disease’ the CDC and manufacturers, whose products protect us from disease, intentionally putting children at day cares, schools and teams at greatest risk for flu ‘outbreaks’ this year?

    Just like a dog or cat sheds hair, the human body gives off, or “sheds,” flu virus when infected. FluMist contains weakened, but live flu strains that infect the body enough to provoke a response from the immune system, but aren’t meant to make a person sick.The manufacturer argued that more viral shedding suggested that the virus was activating the immune system -WebMD

    What does SHEDDING mean?

    It means capable of spreading the multiple strains of flu to all the other children in daycare, students in the classroom, children on the team, teachers, coaches, grandparents…you get the idea. So according to SCIENTIFIC evaluations of the vaccines performed by the manufacturers the vaccinated children are putting EVERYONE at risk exposing them to multiple strains of the flu after being vaccinated with the multiple strand flu mist vaccine.

    Manufactured Flu Season?

    While you are getting the needle free flu midst for your child to protect them you will instead be exposing those around your child with multiple strains of the flu for up to 69 days according to studies. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission –http://ow.ly/z75m300DfJg

    The most recent research from the National Academy of Sciences proves that people who are vaccinated spread the virus more, are not protected, and prior vaccination is harming people’s immunity!

    Does the flu vaccine protect you or those around you? 

    Well according to the research, the opposite would be true. The findings of the study found that those individuals who had received the flu vaccine were “shedding” 6.3 times more virus than the unvaccinated!
    Straight from the research:

    “Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”

    “The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”

    Plain Language.

    Higher viral shedding means that those who were vaccinated were breathing out more influenza virus and would be spreading it more than the unvaccinated. So when doctors, health departments, or health “authorities” like the CDC push the vaccine by saying things like “the vaccine protects you and those around you,” “everyone needs the vaccine because of ‘herd’ immunity,” or “you have to get the vaccine so you protect the very young, the elderly and the very weak/cancer patients etc.,” they would actually be lying.

    6.3 times more aerosol shedding means that those who were vaccinated were spreading more virus into the air around them just by breathing when compared to those who had not received the vaccine that same year and/or the flu vaccine from the previous year. 

    The implications of this finding now show that those who are vaccinated pose a greater risk to the immune compromised, i.e. cancer patients, the elderly and the very young and that the unvaccinated spread the disease less and protect others better! 

    In essence, the vaccine does the exact opposite of what people have been told and explains why we are seeing more and more people get sick earlier each year and more people die from the flu.

    Reduced protection with annual vaccination, means that the flu vaccine weakens a person immunity against infectious illness. This fact has been shown in multiple studies on children and confirmed with animal studies. One such study deserving of “honorable mention” is this study: Effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in influenza-related hospitalization in children: A case-control study which found that children receiving the annual flu vaccine had a “threefold increased risk of hospitalization.”

    <Read more https://www.thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/ >

    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20180222/flumist-may-be-coming-back

  • How to Submit an Immunization Exemption in Idaho

    Idaho Parents have a right to OPT their children out of some (or all) the state-mandated vaccines for daycare and school. There are 3 exemptions for the state medical, religious and ‘other’. Many schools will not disclose this fact, some schools will demand a form signed and completed by parents. This is NOT required by the statute. A signed parental statement of objection is all that is necessary for a parent to provide the school in order to invoke the right of vaccine exemption.

    No shots, no school is simply not true! 

    Parent Signed Statement of Exemption from Vaccine Mandate

    This is an example of text used by a parent submitting an vaccine exemption statement.

    I/We, _________________, pursuant to Idaho Code 39-4802 (2) and IDAPA 16.02.15.110 I/we submit this signed statement to ______________ school officials objecting to immunizations on religious OR other grounds.

    *Keep in mind you don’t have to clarify whether the exemption is for religious or other reasons. Any extra information they ask from you is used for marketing, tracking with the ultimate goal of removing the liability-free vaccine exemptions.

    Vaccine-Exemption-Parent-SubmissionDownload
    PDF-Vaccine-Exemption-Parent-SubmissionDownload

    Idaho statute 39–4802(2) permits a parent/guardian:

    1. The right to choose whether to vaccinate their child.
    2. The right to opt-out without explanation of objection. This form, created by the Health Department is NOT REQUIRED by Idaho statute. Its requirement contradicts the statute which says clearly,

    “Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.” 

    After 3 years of persistence on the part of Health Freedom Idaho the form has been adjusted and Instructions to Parents regarding vaccine exemptions published by the Health and Welfare Department reflect this accurately. < See the new administrative rules for schools and daycares > 

    Health Freedom Idaho is resolved in stopping the deliberate attempt of the schools to violate parental authority to make health care choices and to protect the privacy of the medical information for their children. If you are having problem with schools who are not following law please contact us iamexempt@healthfreedomidaho.com 

    More Resources that Might Interest You: 

    HOTSPOTS! Vaccine exemptions putting the state at risk? Or is it simply propaganda to take away your parental authority?

  • Polio Vaccine

    Do you know the difference between non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) and polio paralysis? 

    “…while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis, but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.” 

    Research source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22591873/
    Image from: https://www.omsj.org/wp-cont…/…/Acute-Flaccid-Paralysis1.jpg

    Learn more about the Polio Vaccine here in the U.S.

    POLIO not eradicated, just renamed.

  • Public Comment Needed: Idaho to Add Second Shot of Meningitis Vaccine for High School

    The Health Department wants to add a second required shot for meningitis to the high school schedule. Here’s the key points. Meningitis is a rare disease, the most serious cases are caused by bacteria. The disease been on a downward trend with historic lows in 2016. Around 300 people in the US and an average 3 in Idaho contract bacterial Meningococcal meningitis each year. The meningococcal vaccine is intended to protect against only 4 strains of bacteria and hasn’t proven very effective. CDC reports findings that 93% of the college students contracting the disease were vaccinated!  Even in the light of these facts, IDHW proposes a new requirement for high school students receive another dose of an ineffective vaccine for a rare disease. Time is of the essence – public comments will only be received until FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 17 is the last day for public comment!

    E-mail: Rafe.Hewett@dhw.idaho.gov  

    TESTIFY IN PERSON!  September 17 – 9:30 a.m.

    Courtyard by Marriott
    Balboa Meeting Room
    1789 S Eagle Road Meridian, ID 83642
    CALL IN 877-820-7831  Participant #137508

    Meningitis. 

    A rare disease that has an annual death rate in the U.S. of approximately 1 in 1,000,000; literally “one in a million.” [1]

    Neisseria meningitidis, the meningococcal bacteria, is passed by coughing or contact with saliva and is normally present in the respiratory tracts of healthy people without causing disease [3, 4, 5]. In fact, probably no one escapes infection. Symptomatic disease is quite rare for N. meningitidis. As such, 100% of the population, vaccinated or not, are asymptomatic carriers at some point in their lives. In fact, at any time, 5-35% of the population is silently carrying the bacteria, though the numbers often rise to nearly 100% in close quarters, such as military barracks and college campuses [4].

    Is meningitis scary? Yes. But, with only 4 strains of bacterial meningitis and 0 strains of viral meningitis in the vaccine, it’s a guessing game, similar to the flu shot, on which strain you’d even be exposed to. The vaccine, in creating an artificial immune response, actually leaves you more vulnerable to the more virulent strains of meningitis, not covered in the vaccine. 

    Idaho infectious disease reports shows the following for Neisseria meningitidis, often referred to as meningococcus. Which causes cause meningitis and other forms of meningococcal disease such as meningococcemia, a life-threatening sepsis. 

    2016: 3 cases
    2015: 0 cases
    2014: 5 cases
    2013: 4 cases

    According to the CDC’s Enhanced Meningococcal Disease Surveillance Report, 2016 the rare disease has been on a downward trend since the late 1990’s.  372 people in 2016 got the disease nationwide. (Incident rate of .12 of 100,000).

    DOCKET NO. 16-0215-1802 (pg 91) The Health Department wants to “require a second dose of meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination before a student enters the 12th grade in Idaho, starting with school year 2020-2021. If a student received their first dose of meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccine at 16 years of age or older, they will not be required to receive the second dose before entry into the 12th grade.”

    The vaccine they are requiring only covers 50% of the strains and is less than 10% effective. Is this about the health of Idaho’s children? 

    How can you, as a parent, best protect your child from meningococcal infection?

    Answer:  Improve your child’s immune system by providing a healthy diet of whole foods that are rich in nutrients.  Give supplements that are high in antioxidants, balanced B-vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids.  Give extra vitamin D3 during cold and flu season.  Heal the gut if your child has gastrointestinal problems.   Stress the importance of getting enough sleep and fresh air.   Help your child learn to relax.  And, just say NO to vaccines that damage your child’s innate immune system.

    Read about this shots function, efficacy and reactions here:

    https://schaabling.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/meningococcal-vaccine-meningitis/

    [1]. Meningococcal Disease and Vaccination.  Fear-Mongering?  YES!! (2011 – disease incident rates have DECREASED since)

    [3] https://www.facebook.com/groups/gentleinformants/permalink/1004672592923652/

    [4] http://femsre.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/1/52.long?view=long&pmid=17233635

    [5] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/meningitis5.html

    New Proposed Rule:

    https://adminrules.idaho.gov/bulletin/2018/07.pdf#page=91

    https://www.millioninsights.com/industry-reports/meningococcal-vaccines-market

    Idaho Infectious Disease Reporting:
    http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/Epidemiology/IdahoDiseaseSummary/tabid/202/Default.aspx

    Disease Trends in Idaho:

    http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Portals/0/Health/Epi/Disease%20Summaries/ID%20DZ%20Trends_2016_FINALv2.pdf

  • How Can They Just Change The Rules Like That?!

    Did you see the new rules? The Health Department is busy this summer and your IMMEDIATE ATTENTION NEEDED! This Thursday and Friday, you the citizen, has the opportunity to use voice and direct the outcome of the rules that affect your family. Our state government is structured in a way that the statutes are voted upon by the Legislature from January to March of each year. The rules (application of those statutes) are directed by the individual state departments throughout the rest of the year. These rules are made up by the departments, but they require public meetings. However, when the public doesn’t attend and our concerns aren’t voiced, the rule changes can seriously impact our daily lives of the citizens. There are two rules they are proposing. One we can get behind and the other needs strong opposition. Please join us! Be Prepared to Testify for 3 minutes. Public speaking IS NOT REQUIRE! Just come support those who are testifying, you submit your written testimony. You can do so Anonymously if you wish!

    How to Testify
    STEP 1: WRITE UP YOUR TESTIMONY and e-mail: Rafe.Hewett@dhw.idaho.gov 

    STEP 2: ATTEND THE RULEMAKING MEETING this Thursday and Friday the Health Department will be hosting a rule making meeting. They held one yesterday, and look how empty it was. It’s time to change that!

    Join Us!
    BOISE AREA RESIDENTS:

    THIS Thursday, July 12, 2018 
    10 a.m. Exemption form discussion 
    <they break for lunch>
    1 p.m. (new vaccine requirement discussion) 
    BOISE AREA: Meridian Courtyard by Marriott Balboa meeting room 1789 South Eagle Road Meridian, ID 83642

    IDAHO FALL AREA RESIDENTS:
    THIS Friday, July 13, 2018 
    8 a.m. Exemption Form Discussion
    10:30 New Vaccine Requirement Discussion
    Idaho Falls Hampton Inn(at the mall)Hampton Bay meeting room 2500 Channing Way Idaho Falls, ID 83404

    THE NEW RULES:
    1.
    Voice your approval for the temporary rule that clarifies the use of a parental written statement for vaccine exemptions for school and daycare. Changes to IDAPA 16.02.15 Immunizations

    Idaho legislators and interested stakeholders have identified the need to clarify this rule to ensure that the immunization exemption/opt-out language therein is consistent with Section 39-4802, Idaho Code, and legislative intent.This rulemaking adds language clarifying that parents requesting an immunization exemption may do so either on the Department’s standard form or in a written, signed statement indicating their choice to exempt their child from immunization requirements.
    See our article about the vaccine exemption form problems

    *This rule has been added temporarily in order to help parents enroll in school and daycare programs. We must still voice our approval so that it will remain.

    2.
    Voice Your Disapproval for the increased vaccine requirements for high schools students.

    NEW IMMUNIZATION REQUIREMENT FOR SCHOOLS
    The Department invites interested stakeholders to participate in negotiated rulemaking for this chapter, IDAPA16.02.15, “Immunization Requirements for Idaho School Children.” The purpose of this rulemaking is to add a new school entry immunization requirement to require a second dose of meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination beforea student enters the 12th grade in Idaho, starting with school year 2020-2021. If a student received their first dose ofmeningococcal (MenACWY) vaccine at 16 years of age or older, they will not be required to receive the second dosebefore entry into the 12th grade.

    Learn More about the Ineffectiveness of the Vaccine
    In 2015 there were a total of 375 cases NATIONWIDE. In 2016 it reached a historic low rate of .12 per 100,000 people a total of 370 cases nationwide.
    https://www.cdc.gov/meningococcal/surveillance/index.html

    CDC reports that those in College who had meningitis 92% were vaccinated.
    CDC reports that adverse reactions to the vaccine .3%.
     https://www.cdc.gov/meningococcal/downloads/NCIRD-EMS-Report.pdf

     These are the figures for New York, doing the math – how would they compare to Idaho? 

    ______________________

    REMEMBER THERE ARE SEVERAL METHOD OF PARTICIPATION:

    Persons wishing to participate in the negotiated rulemaking may do any of the following:

    1. Attend or call in to the negotiated rulemaking meetings as scheduled above;

    2. Provide oral or written recommendations, or both, at the negotiated rulemaking meetings; or

    3. Submit written recommendations and comments to this address on or before Friday, July 13, 2018:

    Send to: Hand deliver to:Idaho Department of Health and Welfare Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Division of Public Health Division of Public Health

    Attn: Rafe Hewett, Health Program Manager
    P.O. Box 83720 450 West State Street, 4th Floor Boise, ID 83720-0036 

    E-mail: Rafe.Hewett@dhw.idaho.gov
    Rafe Hewett at (208) 334-5942

    Freedom requires self-discipline, and it begins with our understanding of how our State and Federal Government are structured and becoming involved in the statutes and rules that are created by them. We hope to make it easy to participate and protect your health freedoms in Idaho. 

  • Top 5 Things to Consider About Childhood Vaccines

    Vaccines are one of the most critical topics a parent can research. Beyond the connection of vaccines and autism are some statistics and facts that should be closely examined. Its not easy wading through the plethora of  marketing materials from companies that financially benefit from your child’s immunizations. Take a moment to consider these five points: US children are the most vaccinated in the world and yet we have seen an exponential increase in chronic illness in our children. Statistics reflect that our children will live shorter lives than their parents. Could this be because vaccines contain some of the most toxic and carcinogenic ingredients on the planet and are injected into our children 72 times by the age of 18. Do you realize that your child will receive more shots before the age of 5 than you received in your entire life. It begs the question, if vaccines work so well, why do we need so many?!! Perhaps it’s just about money and not your child’s health. Consider this, the number of vaccines on the US childhood schedule has increased exponentially AFTER the manufacturers and the doctors no longer have any liability for a vaccine reaction causing the death or injury of your child from the shots….
    1960: 5 vaccines
    1980: 20 vaccines
    1995: 40 vaccines
    2016: 72 vaccines
    Just as disturbing is the fact that all the manufacturers creating our children’s vaccine have pled guilty of fraud (A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain). Yet they tell us their products are perfectly safe for our children and we believe them.  Take a moment to research these facts (bit.ly/considervax), take a look at the manufacturer’s inserts for the vaccines your child is to receive (read the label) before injecting them. Our children are a precious and their health is a parent’s responsibility. 
    <PRINTABLE PDF FILE OF FLYERS>

    The above graphic was created with number from 2014. Those little ‘red people’ representing our sons and daughters with autism diagnosis, has increased to 1 in 36 with ASD diagnosis as 1 in 27 boys. 

    Don’t take our word for it. Learn more at www.bit.ly/considervax 

  • Police report reveals reasons police took Idaho newborn

    We have an incredible piece of information regarding the case of the removal of baby Elijah from the care of his parents in North Idaho. The mother gave birth on November 20, 2017 via c-section in a hospital in Kootenai County (Kootenai Health). The police took the newborn on the 22nd after dad refused vaccinations while mother and child were still in the hospital awaiting release. One of the accusations listed in the police report  is that “the staff feared the parents would not complete follow-up medical care.” The police report states erroneously that Ari, the newborn’s father, is against medical intervention. This is just one of the accusations they used the child from his family claiming the parents as unsafe and unfit.

    “Ari is against medical intervention such as vaccinations. It is feared that Ari would not take Elijah to get medical attention or do any sort of follow-up after his birth.”


    Police Report for the removal of newborn

    If this family was against medical intervention, they  would not have birthed their child in a medical facility. If this family was against medical care, would the mother be receiving ongoing treatment for her cerebral palsy? Clearly, this family does believe in receiving medical care, they are opposed to the hep b vaccination used against an STD for their newborn son.

    And if they WERE against medical intervention…Where in Idaho statute  does it grant the police authority to remove a healthy newborn due to the possibility that family might not participate in ‘wellness visits’ at a local pediatrician?  ***Furthermore, it is a God given right of parents to determine the modality that they use to pursue wellness for their children. This line must never be crossed.***

    Diamond’s disability was clearly another excuse police and CPS used to remove the newborn from his parents. The hospital staff identified some specialized needs of this family, and instead of assisting the young couple, they called the police to take their child. 

    The police report states:
    “There are times when Elijah was being suffocated when being breastfed. There were no actions taken to prevent him from suffocating.”

    The couple wants their infant breastfed and needs support in understanding of proper latching and positioning of the infant, as is the case with many first time parents. Diamond’s physical limitations require Ari to assist with nursing positions. The police report states “No actions were taken to prevent the newborn from suffocating.” If the baby was in fact suffocating and no actions were taken to prevent it, as the officer alleges, then one would have concluded the baby suffocated, however Elijah is, in fact, alive and well. It is commonly understood that to suffocate means to:  die or cause to die from lack of air or inability to breathe.

    The fact that the child wasn’t nursing correctly that doesn’t warrant his removal from his parents. There are many ways to resolve breastfeeding issues, specialized training with clear direction from hospital staff on how to position the child safely on his mother’s breast could have easily corrected the issue.

    In an effort to discredit Ari as a loving and capable father, the police report identifies some outrageous reasons to claim he is unfit to parent his child:

    • (Father) left the infant with mom while they were both in the care of hospital staff.  Are we not to trust hospital staff for the care of our loved ones? Many fathers have been known to leave the hospital trusting in the medical care provided by staff for their families.
    • Father and infant slept together with infant resting safely on his father’s chest. 


    A baby needs to be held for physical, emotional and mental well-being yet authorities are using the father’s moments of restful bonding with his newborn son as an excuse that he is an unfit father?

    • The infant cried and wasn’t attended to immediately. Sleep – deprived parents have been known to not awaken to a cry immediately. The young family, still in the hospital was adjusting to their newborn. Taking advantage of the security of a safety net of nurses scurrying to and fro, this father didn’t awaken instantaneously. Can you imagine if someone was monitoring your sleep patterns to determine how long your baby cried before you were alert enough to meet his needs? If that was a determining factor in your right to parent a child, would CPS be coming to take your child away?

      This family wasn’t even given the opportunity to develop their new family rhythm. They have the support of a close knit church, with experienced parents willing and able to be available to support in any way necessary.

    This mother’s disability and father’s protective action against vaccinations gave the state an excuse to remove the newborn.  Now, the family suffers from the constant threat that CPS will come in, under the guise of ‘safety investigations’ and snatch their precious baby again.

    This family needs our continued support.

    Police Report for the removal of newborn

    UPDATE: CASE DISMISSED. DECEMBER 18, 2017

    The case against baby Elijah’s parents has been dropped. It NEVER should have happened to begin with. Please take the time to read the police report. In addition to lies about the parents, they admit in the report that CPS took the baby because of the parents’ choice to opt their baby out of the Hep B vax. There was no neglect, no drug use, no reason at all to believe the baby was in danger.

    We WILL NOT allow the kidnapping of children in Idaho. It was because of the public pressure and outrage that this baby is safely back home with his loving parents. Thank you to everyone who called and emailed and took the time to stand against this injustice.

    We must be vigilant to hold those in authority accountable for their actions, for the sake of our own liberty and freedom.

  • When Schools Lie and Deny Enrollment, It’s ILLEGAL!

    By Sarah Anne

    Registration for the School year has begun. The Health Dept’s No Shots – No School Campaign is in full swing. ITS A LIE! Idaho vaccine exemptions available to families for religious, medical and philosophical reasons. DO NOT BE BULLIED!

    Did your school tell you “no shots – no school?” They are lying! In Idaho, it is illegal to deny your child entrance to school based on the vaccination status.
    The LAW makes provision for children’s entrance to school REGARDLESS of immunization / vaccine status.(See Idaho Statute)

    A Boise mom shared with Health Freedom Idaho that when she turned in her kids’ 2017 immunization exemption forms at the school and they made her speak with the school nurse who LECTURED her about how she was putting her children at risk. The mom, though in her legal rights to make health choices on behalf of her children, felt belittled and left the campus in tears. 

    THIS BULLYING IS UNACCEPTABLE.
    THE LAW IS CLEAR.
    Parents make the choice on which shots their children receive. It is NOT up to the schools to lecture, bully or belittle a parent’s health choices for their children. The schools, funded by tax dollars and under the authority of Idaho statute, are required to accept a parental exemption without question or discourse.

    Health Freedom Idaho is committed to protecting YOUR freedom to choose and your children’s access to education. This is a right that is being denied to more and more families. Here is an excerpt from the IDAPA rules published by the Health Department. Its clear that there are only 3 legal requirements to invoke a vaccine exemption; the child’s name and birthday and a simple statement from the parent/guardian statement: I am invoking my child’s right to vaccine/immunization exemptions on religious or other grounds.

    Any additional information requested by schools or the Health Department is voluntary and can not be used to deny your child’s access to school. .
    SCHOOL VACCINE EXEMPTION FORM
    CHILDCARE VACCINE EXEMPTION FORM

    We want to help.
    Were you bullied by school officials?
    Were you denied enrollment to school?
    Was your child discriminated against because of an “incomplete” vaccine record?
    Were your forced to sign an incriminating form?
    Did you force vaccinate your child in order to have access to public or private education?

    If your family has been victim to the school’s coercion please contact: Iamexempt@healthfreedomidaho.com

    Its urgent! Unless families stand up against the bullying it will continue and the discrimination will get worse.

  • Anti Vaccine Movement is Hundreds of Years Old

    Suzanne Humphries, MD “The anti-vaccine movement is hundreds of years old. It heated up in the 1800s, when parents in the UK became fed up with watching their healthy infants and children become ill or die shortly after the smallpox vaccinations or get sick from smallpox anyway. .. it is clear that the issue is not ‘settled long ago, and laid to rest’ as most of the medical profession says it is. 

     A close look at medical text books down the decades reveals a very interesting trend.  In the 1920s and 30s, doctors were often quite relaxed over diseases which today are presented as more deadly than the plague.  Many grandparents today are completely bemused at the way the medical profession describes infections which were to most of them, straightforward holidays off school.

    This is not stating that there were never serious consequences.  There sometimes were.  However, today, most parents erroneously believe that every child will die from diseases which most grandparents found were nuisance value only.

    The medical system now considers measles more dangerous than the plague, and the most dangerous disease known to man.  Yet there is no need to be afraid of measles, because well-nourished children who get adequate vitamin A have an unremarkable course to recovery.  Boredom might be their biggest whine.

    I have discovered that whooping cough isn’t something to be scared of either.  In the days when my only tool was an antibiotic, whooping cough occasionally caused me considerable concern, but not today.  I’ve watched many parents all over the world treat whooping cough very simply by using high doses of vitamin C and occasionally homeopathy. They see rapid improvement and no serious complications.  But you will not read about these cases in “peer reviewed literature” and your doctor doesn’t know about them, because sick children are the only ones counted in the morbidity statistics.  Healthy children who uneventfully recover, are not seen by the medical system and therefore are not counted.

    The serious consequences from most childhood diseases comes from just a few things; infant formula, cow’s milk, common medical drugs especially antibioitcs, malnutrition, and vaccines, as well and a lack of knowledge about simple methods of home nursing.

    All of these barriers to recovery are completely avoidable in the USA and many other countries and that is WHY we see so many healthy children who were never vaccinated, when we take the time to look.

    See how mortality for the common illnesses had declined significantly long before the vaccines were created.

    Historically, in the case of infectious diseases, good nutrition has been and still is, a major preventive factor, that has led to enormous declines of morbidity and mortality from most infectious diseases.”

    read more from Suzanne Humphries, MD blog found at http://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/

  • Truth and Gardasil: Changing A Girl’s Life FOREVER


    This Shot Changed One Girl’s Life Forever

    Over the years, a range of adverse reactions have been reported worldwide after the HPV vaccinations. However, the discovery that the HPV vaccine has been found to cause infertility in some women has only been publicized more recently.

    In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3 Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which Dr. Little detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper states:

    “Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.

    Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counselled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.” [2]

    As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report states that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

    The Weekly Briefing stated:

    “In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”

    Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”

    The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute. [3]

    Thousands of Women Are Now Infertile Because of Vaccines

    It is extremely unusual for a girl of this age to enter early menopause. So, we must ask ourselves, was it the vaccine that caused her symptoms or was it something else?

    I decided to research if there were any other reports or papers on the subject of vaccination and infertility. I was horrified by what I discovered.

    I found a total of 56 research papers listed on PubMed relating to contraceptive vaccines, dating as far back as 1977. No doubt a researcher entering a range of different search terms could come up with many more. [4]

    This led me to question whether or not vaccines were being manufactured deliberately to cause infertility. One paper in particular, published in 1989, written by G.P. Talwar and R. Raghupathy titled Anti-Fertility Vaccines appears to suggest that they are. The authors stated:

    “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.

    A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future.” [5]

    It is difficult to judge from this abstract whether these vaccines were being developed for use on humans or animals. However, further research has led me to believe that these vaccines were being developed for humans, because not long after this paper was published, vaccines were administered to women and children in a number of countries, including Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, causing many of them to become infertile.

    Girls and Women as Fertility Control Guinea Pigs

    In 1997, another paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers was published by Immunology and Cell Biology. The author stated in the introduction:

    “The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.

    Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.” [7]

    At first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper.

    On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:

    “Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”

    Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:

    “Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumours are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”

    The author continued by adding:

    “Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”

    These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries for tetanus in 1994, just three years earlier, which were also found to contain the hormone hCG.

    So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on? It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before this paper was written.

    Another point that should be mentioned here is the fact that these trials were unethical, and yet there is no mention of an ethics committee. Were members of an ethics committee ever consulted before any of these vaccines were administered?

    Conclusion

    What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely horrific. It appears that many of the recommended vaccinations are known by the governments and pharmaceutical industries to cause infertility. Many of these vaccines are mandatory. We need to ask ourselves why our governments are deliberately force-vaccinating us with vaccines known to cause infertility.

    Another question we need to ask is why are so many studies being funded to study the subject area surrounding vaccines and infertility.

    Many leading professionals believe that these vaccines are being offered as part of a global depopulation plan. We need to ask ourselves whether or not our governments have the right to play God with our lives without our knowledge or consent.

    I believe it is high time that we took back the control of our own lives and researched all vaccinations thoroughly before we agree to be vaccinated. Ultimately, it is each person’s decision whether or not they should be vaccinated, and the only way that we can make an informed choice about vaccinations is to be fully informed of the facts before agreeing to be vaccinated.

    I have proven, by referencing documents, articles and scientific papers, that a series of vaccines are being developed that are known to cause infertility. These vaccines have been and still are being administered to innocent people without their knowledge or consent. Surely, this practice is not only unethical, it is criminal.

     

    Christina England, BA Hons

    1. http://www.naturalnews.com/041099_gardasil_side_effect_japan_infertility.html

    2. http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract

    3. http://pop.org/content/teenage-girl-becomes-infertile-after-gardasil-vaccination

    4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?orig_db=PubMed…

    5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2665354

    6. http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm

    7. http://www.nature.com/icb/journal/v75/n2/abs/icb199726a.html

    8. http://www.infowars.com/polysorbate-80-in-swine-flu-vaccines-infertility-in-humans/

    9. http://preventdisease.com/news/pdf/FLUARIX_2009LatestPackageInsert_us_fluarix.pdf

    10. http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death/#sthash.eg67UXq2.dpuf