The NFLPA has long been committed to protecting the health and safety of the players it represents, particularly in relation to the risk of traumatic brain injury and concussions. Health Freedom Defense Fund has urged the National Football League Players’ Association to focus on a new health concern that could affect NFL players’ long-term health and safety. The call comes in the wake of recent tragic events, including Damar Hamlin’s multiple cardiac arrests and the heart attacks and strokes of former NFL players Uche Nwaneri, Chris Baker, and Jessie Lemonier. A growing body of scientific literature suggests that COVID-19 vaccines could be a contributing factor.
Idaho Schools MUST Accept a Parent’s Signed Statement for Vaccine Exemption for Religious or Philosophical Reasons. They must disclose the availability of exemptions when communicating about vaccines/immunizations.
Idaho has some of the strongest languages in the US when it comes to parental rights and vaccines!
Idaho has all three exemptions in place -medical, philosophical, and religious. We do not have to use an incriminating state form. A simple written statement invoking your right to a vaccine exemption is all that is required to exempt your child from some or all vaccinations.
As of 2021, schools must, by law, inform parents of these rights and must cite this section of the code!!
Idaho has vaccine exemptions for school and daycare. MEDICAL * PHILOSOPHICAL * RELIGIOUS
By law, the Schools/Daycares must communicate your right to exemptions when they communicate about ‘immunizations’. Section (3) to Idaho Code 39-4802
You do NOT have to fill out a specific state form nor can they discriminate against your child for any reason regarding their vaccine status.
The only thing necessary to evoke your child’s immunization exemption is a signed parental statement.
Example of a signed statement could be as follows:
I/We, _______________________________________, pursuant to Idaho Code 39-4802 (2)
and IDAPA 16.02.15.110 I/we submit this signed statement to the school _______________________________________________________
officials objecting to immunizations on religious OR other grounds for our child ________________(name)__________________________ and (date of birth).
Changes to Idaho Law: Schools MUST Inform Parents of their right to exemptions when they communicate about “immunizations”.
The amendment to section 39-4802 reads as follows:
“School officials shall describe the exemptions provided in this section and provide a citation to this section in any communication to parents and guardians regarding immunization.”
Idaho parents will finally receive full transparency about what is actually required by Idaho law.
If parents receive any form of communication regarding vaccine requirements after July 1, 2021, that doesn’t properly include the exemption information, they should contact the school board, their district, the superintendent, the Health and Welfare Department, as well as the Department of Education.
*Send a photo and CC the communication to Health Freedom Idaho so we can track the schools that violate the law. EMAIL US if your school/daycare fails to follow the law
2022 -while Idahoans are looking for a quick fix to bypass the injection mandate issue, religious or medical exemptions may look like the best way out. Fill out a form, get approval, and keep your job. If this is your only option, it may be what you have to do to keep your job. But please consider the following:
Our rights are inherent and come from God.
Inherent means they cannot be taken (by the government, a corporation, or anyone else.)
“We must not go down the road to accept mandates
that violate our inalienable rights and then settle for an option to be exempt. We must demand our human rights be respected, to begin with.
The concept of mandated medical procedures is a direct violation of our rightto bodily autonomy and self-determination.” – Representative Heather Scott
The Idaho Constitution says this:
All men are by nature free and equal, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; pursuing happiness, and securing safety.
Also, this:
All political power is inherent in the people. The government is instituted
for their equal protection and benefit…
And this, regarding religious freedom:
“The exercise and enjoyment of religious faith and worship shall forever be guaranteed; and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege, or capacity on account of his religious opinions” and also, “No person shall be required to attend or support any ministry or place of worship, religious sect or denomination, or pay tithes against his consent; nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship.” (See VACCINES ARE ABORTION TAINTED and 181 Aborted Babies used to Create Vaccine)
We must go back to the place of respecting and upholding our Constitution.
We must not allow the government to chip away at our rights
and then have to beg for bits of them back in the form of waivers, exemptions, exceptions,
Rally for Medical Freedom. Some 4,000 protesters gathered Saturday at Riverfront Park to advocate for “medical freedom” in the face of coronavirus mandates.
As a pro-life Christian, I believe that human beings are created by God in His image. Therefore every person, from conception to natural death, possesses inherent dignity and immeasurable worth – including preborn children.
As a Christian, then, I am called to defend, protect, and value all human life.
In the area of vaccines, some Christians and ministries have unknowingly taken positions in contradiction to their own core value of the sanctity of human life, and have based those positions on intentionally deceptive and incorrect information promoted by the industry itself.
These vaccine developers didn’t just passively sort through discarded baby parts. They were actively involved in aborting the babies in such a way as to maximize access to “fresh” tissue in order to develop their products.
An aborted baby boy was also used as spare parts in the production of vaccines. His designation is MRC-5 – let’s call him Michael. Michael’s 27- year old mother was ‘given an abortion’ for psychological reasons…
Did that mother suffering from mental health issues have a choice? Certainly – The babies didn’t.
Their bodies were sacrificed at the altar of science and justified by our CHURCHES and Christian Organizations under the guise of ”good for mankind.”
During the rubella outbreak in Philadelphia in 1964 doctors convinced pregnant women that they had been exposed to rubella – the 3-day measles and that their baby would be born horribly deformed if they continued with their pregnancy.
Mothers were exploited and Manipulated by FEAR,
And they allowed the murder of their child.
NOT 2 NOR 5, NOT 10 or 20
But 26 mothers aborted their babies at the direction of their doctors.
Their aborted babies’ bodies were immediately sent to the science labs of Dr. Stanley Plotkin.
When researchers dissected the aborted fetuses it was then determined that these precious human beings were HEALTHY -uninfected..sacrificed in vain…Unusable for their medical research and product development.
The 27th baby was infected. RA273. Rubella-abortus-27th – 3rd tissue sample that contained the live rubella virus.
And although he had successfully isolated the virus that would eventually be used in the rubella vaccine on the market today, it didn’t stop there. In subsequent research papers, Dr. Plotkin noted another 40 aborted babies were dissected to obtain further virus samples.
This means there were at least 67 babies electively aborted just to obtain the virus for the rubella vaccine.
But they STILL had to culture the virus – on the bodies of even MORE aborted babies.
The bodies of 32 ‘elective abortions’ produced the final WI-38 cell line. Are you counting? We are up to 99 aborted babies.
**As a mother – the lives of the previous two were enough to stop vaccinating. Do the 99 sacrificial lives give you pause?
I don’t vaccinate because of my firmly held moral objection to abortion tainted vaccines. I don’t vaccinate because of my religious beliefs.
And now mandates are here. We have to choose between feeding our families or taking a product developed with child sacrifice. We can clearly see that the school mandates are coming for our children.
ALL THREE VACCINE EXEMPTIONS EXIST IN IDAHO! If you received enrollment paperwork for your child stating that vaccines are required – without disclosing there is exemptions – you are being lied to!
We expect our schools to teach our children knowledge of reading and writing. We expect the campus to be free from bullying. We expect the schools to enforce the community standards of respect and telling the truth. And yet, when parents enroll their children into school these standards are ignored by administration and staff.
Parents are lied to by omission which is lying. They are bullied and harassed. The full disclosure of the law is ignored.
Citizens brought forth a bill that would require the health department and school administration to provide full disclosure of the law. This bill passed the House with a vote of 52 to 17. Yes, 17 representatives believed that coercion at the hands of the health department and schools is acceptable. )
However, due to the structure of our legislature ONE MAN stopped this bill from being heard in the Senate. The power of the Chairman of the Health Committee used his personal opinion in favor of vaccines to keep this informed consent bill from being put to a vote. Senator Fred Martin believes the outright lies of the marketing campaigns via the health department and the school’s administrative policies is appropriate.
One mom writes:
I was registering my son for kindergarten today (his only partial year of public school before he will be homeschooled). I noticed this passage and the way it was worded when I was filling out his registration paperwork. I came with his vaccine exemption form in hand already filled out, which they accepted. I was really bothered by the fact that we have the right to waive vaccines, and yet they write to parents that by law they have to have their vaccinations. This is wrong. They should say something like, “It is Idaho State Law that you must have complete immunization records or an Idaho School Immunization Exemption Form to register your child for school.”
I listened to moms coming in worried that they didn’t have vaccination records and the school never gave them the option to waive.
If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?
– Concerned Mom
Dear Senators and Representatives – If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?
A hearing last year to require school to give complete information on the law that includes vaccine exemptions for medical, religious and other reasons Senators advised that parents should try to inform one another. The vote against a measure of informed consent allows the school’s are allowed to deceive, lie, and bully parents by failing to inform parents of their full rights under Idaho statue.
The CITIZENS want schools to tell the truth, full disclosure. NO MORE BULLYING! This is outright coercing parents with inadequate information on the actual state statute. It should NOT be the responsibility of the citizen to inform one another of the schools deceiptful tatics. It should be the responsibility of the tax supported schools and state Health departments to be accountable to the LAW.
Why? Because school officials have said, their goal is increased vaccination rates. Our schools rank at the bottom of education for the United States. Our school system is failing our children. The focus of the school should be to improve knowledge, reading and math and sciences. They should NOT be involved in the medical affairs of families. These decisions should be left between doctor and parent and not be coerced by school officials.
There is clear evidence that vaccines are produced using the bodies of aborted human beings and experimentation of the product was performed on severely disabled humans. Some “prolifers” have agreed that since the aborted fetal cell lines were already in existence (and not created for the purpose of making a vaccine), at least some good came from the babies who died. However, they would never condone the abortion itself.
Dr. Theresa Deisher, founder and chief scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, has questioned the necessity of a vaccine against COVID-19, saying: “[w]e’re making a vaccine at warp speed for a virus that doesn’t look like it’s going to need a vaccine.”
Deisher explains that “this virus to date has less than a 0.03% fatality rate and most of those people, I believe it’s 92% or above, have other health problems.” She added that developing a vaccine in such a quick time frame “is possible, but I don’t believe it is desirable, nor do I believe that it’s safe,” with as much as “15% of the very healthy young volunteers [experiencing] significant side effects.” Many of the initial vaccine recipients have had significant adverse reactions to the vaccine. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
___________
Focus on the Family, and the Catholic Church (and other religious organizations* See below) make the argument that something ‘good’ was developed on the sacrificed bodies of human beings, and even though they were tested on severely disabled individuals, vaccines ‘morally’ acceptable.
We submit that their argument is ‘false thinking’ and as tainted as the vaccines themselves.
These researchers didn’t dig through discarded body parts to make something useful. The abortions were performed in such a way to deliver LIVE CELL SAMPLES to the laboratory for dissection and research. In addition, the principal researcher Dr. Plokin admits to unethically experimenting on children and adults with disabilities in order to develop his product that is now mandated to be injected into school children of all faiths.
Vaccines were cultured exclusively on animal tissue prior to the 1960’s (animals such as the rhesus monkey).
Culturing vaccines on animal cells was useful but had unintended consequences. A well-documented example is the discovery of vaccines contaminated with the SV40 virus from rhesus monkey cells used in its production.
In the early 1960’s, Dr. Leonard Hayflick was the first researcher who set out to create a “fetal cell line” for use in culturing vaccines instead of using animal tissue.
A fetal cell line is derived from live cells taken from an aborted baby. The live cells are modified so they can replicate indefinitely.
In 1962, Dr. Hayflick developed the first fetal cell line called WI-38 (Wistar Institute, 38th fetal sample) from the lung tissue of an aborted 31 week gestation baby girl.
The data in his 1961 and 1965 papers show at least 23 aborted babies used in the research around the creation of WI-38. The number is likely higher, given that some of the cell strains he researched were not documented in his published papers.
Fetal cell line WI-38 is currently being used in the
Next, in 1964 Dr. Stanley Plotkin isolated a rubella virus strain, RA 27/3 (Rubella Abortus, 27th fetus, 3rd tissue culture explant), that was later used in Merck’s rubella vaccine.
RA 27/3 was combined with WI-38 to create the rubella vaccine we use today.
It is well established that almost 80 aborted babies were used in the research leading to the development of RA 27/3. Dr. Plotkin’s 1969 article cites 76 of those abortions.
Dr. Plotkin’s value of life is revealed through his actions. He tested his rubella vaccine on orphans as young as 14 months old and “seronegative mentally retarded children”.
In a letter to the editor, he defended his colleagues’ unethical experimental research on those with disabilities at Willowbrook Hospital. He stated that “performing initial studies on children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential… nonfunctioning persons” is acceptable, even preferred. He went on to state, “Morality must be defined by circumstances and facts.”
12. In 1966, researchers at the Medical Research Council in the UK developed the fetal cell line MRC-5, from a 3 1/2 month gestation baby boy who was aborted for psychiatric reasons from a physically healthy 27 year old mother.
13. MRC-5 is used in numerous vaccines today, including:
CDC Vaccine Excipient Guide information is now being censored. The CDC has ‘updated’ their list without any changes to the vaccines themselves.
14. After their initial creation, each fetal cell line is reproduced many times over. Though they theoretically reproduce indefinitely, they have a finite lifespan of use, as they become more oncogenic (tumor-causing/cancerous) with each reproduction.
15. Due to the finite nature of the use of the current fetal cell lines, researchers have (since the 1960’s) continued to this day using aborted babies in their work toward creating new fetal cell lines.
16. Here’s a list of just a few fetal cell lines created in the years since WI-38, RA 27/3, and MRC-5 (with links to where some of these aborted fetal cells can actually be purchased): WI-44, MRC-7, MRC-9, HEK 293, PER.C6, IMR-90, IMR-91, TIG-1, Walvax-2.
17. The most recent fetal cell line, Walvax-2, was developed by Chinese researchers in 2015 using a 3-month gestation baby girl.
18. Walvax-2 researchers matter-of-factly describe intentionally aborting 9 babies using the “water bag method” of abortion. It’s illegal in the United States. As little value as our country places on life, this practice is so inhumane it is still banned in America. In layman’s terms, the mother’s uterus is filled with saline water so the baby can essentially be floated out of her uterus alive and in-tact. The baby is then given straight to researchers who quickly dissect them alive because a viable fetal cell line requires live cells. In the researcher’s own words, the “tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.”
19. These aborted babies were used for research in 2015, not 60 years ago. It is a current and ongoing practice.
20. Walvax-2 was specifically developed as a replacement for the aging MRC-5 cell line. It was tested with rabies, hepatitis, and Varicella viruses, and was found to be “equal or superior to MRC-5 cells for cultivating these viruses”.
Dissecting aborted babies (many presumed to be alive at the time) for vaccine research has been a consistent and ongoing practice for the past 60 years.
Researchers and scientists worked with local doctors to identify the preborn children whose sacrificed bodies would be used to “improve the health” others. The very definition of ‘child sacrifice’.
I had allowed minimal information to inform a most delicate decision for my children. I submitted without thinking critically to headlines and news articles. In the end, I allowed the thoughts of an atheist researcher with different moral, ethical and spiritual views than me to determine what I thought about such an important subject.
How does this impact the heart of our living God? As the creator and sustainer of life, I think His heart is deeply grieved over this practice.
Dr. Jay L. Wile – holds an earned Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry. He is best known as the author of award-winning elementary, junior and senior high school science courses including the Science through HisStory, “Discovering Design with…”, and “Exploring Creation with…” series. (I have these books as well and can take photos for you too)
Edward Zaccaro – Book, “The 10 Things All Future Mathematicians and Scientist Must Know (but are rarely taught)” Chapter 6: It is Important to Maintain a Healthy Skepticism subtitle The Avnit-Vaccination Movement (I have this book and the photos if you need them)
World Magazine – a magazine that is produced for youth and children to teach them a Biblical Worldview. It comes free with some curriculum
References: 1 – L. Hayflick et al., “The Limited In Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains,” Experimental Cell Research 37, (1965): 615. 2 – “Gamma Globulin Prophylaxis; Inactivated Rubella Virus; Production and Biological Control of Live Attenuated Rubella Virus Vaccines,” American Journal of Diseases of Childhood 118, no. 2 (1969): 378. 3 – J.P. Jacobs et al., “Characteristics of a Human Diploid Cell Designated MRC-5,” Nature 227 (1970): 168. 4 – Ibid.,170. 5 – Transcript of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hearing date 16 May 2001, 91. 6 – Judie Brown, “The Means of Vaccines,” National Catholic Register, April 30-May 6, 2000. 7 – J.C. Wilke, M.D., “Vaccines, Today’s Controversy,” Life Issues Connector, Life Issues Institute, July 2001. 8 – Bernard Nathanson, M.D., “Vaccines OK’d Despite Dark Past,” National Catholic Register, June 18-24, 2000.
Our hearts break for our friends in CA. 💔 They have given everything they have to the fight against SB276 which was signed into law today by a corrupt governor.
Shared from California. Their vaccine mandate bill that removes almost all medical exemptions passed the House today. The legislators voted to “ignore their rules” requiring a bill to be read 3 times. ”They called a “suspension of rules”. In the dark, the assembly heard SB276 and passed. Amendments added via another bill, they tore through the Assembly, and Senate will hear the bill, then rapidly signed by the governor. Segregation, degrading and demonizing our children. We are In distress #America!
Yesterday in California, a bill went from Introduction through committee to the Assembly Floor to the Senate Floor to the Governor, who signed it
In 8 hours Without a SINGLE public hearing. Despite THOUSANDS of constituents outside waiting their turn to speak, demanding the bill be stopped.
55,000 medically fragile California school children will not be able to go back to school after next year.
Children who have already suffered from these pharmaceutical products.
Children who have lost a sibling or family member from these pharmaceutical products.
Children who are immunocompromised and can’t tolerate those pharmaceutical products.
Children who are genetically immunocompromised and cannot tolerate these pharmaceutical products.
Now, any doctor who dares listen to his patients about their children having an adverse reaction will be persecuted, penalized, and investigated for writing more than 5 medical waivers.
No doctor will be willing to help his patients with adverse reactions to vaccines now.
Every single doctor who has ever tried to help his patients with vaccine adverse reactions prior to this draconian new law, is already being investigated and scrutinized as it is.
SB276 makes a parent put their child through near death before they are granted a waiver, and it would only be good for 1 vaccine. So that child would still have to get all other vaccines including new ones (new ones are regularly added to the schedule).
With the passage of this bill, not even a Doctor can excuse a child from an injection that they feel may harm them. California parents have lost their ability to follow a doctor’s advice about vaccination. A state bureaucrat is now in charge of that decision. And if they say no, the child will be forced out of school.
With the passage of SB 276 medical vaccine exemptions essentially no longer exist.
No Fraudulent Medical Exemptions were Found
The bill was written in the premise that fraudulent vaccine exemptions were being written. Some report that of the 4000 exemptions reviewed. The primary co-author of the bill confirmed that ZERO medical exemptions were found fraudulent.
Z E R O!
Pharma puppet is looking to vilify any doctor who writes medical exemptions- essentially stripping them away from medically fragile children. He is claiming “fake medical exemptions hurt kids”, all while there is 🚨NO EMERGENCY🚨. There is zero proof that the low amount of children who utilize a medical exemption because ❗️GASP❗️they actually qualify for one are a threat to others. This is the government interfering with the doctor-patient relationship and punishing doctors for doing what is in the best interest of their patients. California doctors will not write medical exemptions for children now for fear of backlash.
“Under California’s SB276 your child would have to experience anaphylactic shock- a life-threatening reaction- to every vaccine, 8 times to qualify for a medical exemption.”
Parents are now faced with the decision to homeschool their children or leave the state of California in order to protect their children from mandated medical assault.
This is NOT about achieving herd immunity in order to protect the vulnerable… I have had people contact me saying that even when their child or a family member suffered IMMEDIATE life-threatening reactions to vaccines, that doctors STILL had “no idea” what was going on, and don’t consider the vaccines as the cause.
All pharmaceutical products can harm people in at least some cases. It’s foolish to believe that is not true for vaccines.
This is about forcing EVERYONE to vaccinate, regardless of their health, regardless of being vaccine injured, regardless of if you lost a child to vaccines already.
Herd immunity was based on a concept that only a percentage of individuals in a population (60% or even less) had to contract the infection for others to be protected…
Vaccines cannot and never will allow us to attain herd immunity and California will continue to have outbreaks despite their goal of 100% vaccination rates in schools.
THEY KNOW THIS.
SB 276 is a clear example of government overreach, resulting in the unnecessary and inefficient use of taxpayer dollars. Since SB 277 eliminated both personal belief and religious exemptions (47 other states allow either or both), vaccination rates increased from 92.9 to 94.8 percent. Currently, less than 1 percent of California kindergartners have a permanent medical exemption. In addition, 96.6 percent of kindergartners have had the MMR to protect against the measles infection.
Mary Holland Esq
Who’s Next?
They will come for adults next, with more and more boosters.
But just so you know, more frequent boosters actually have been found to = less effectiveness, and the sicker and older you are, the less your immune system will respond appropriately to vaccines.
They don’t care, they will vaccinate you anyway!!
– Ashley Everly
Health Freedom Warriors WILL NOT STOP!
I am so emotional today following what’s happening in Sacramento. My heart is breaking for them. California was my home. I know our time here in Idaho will come. The pharmaceutical industry has a stronghold on this nation. If you are leaving California in search of medical freedom, please get in touch with Health Freedom Idaho. We are working to gather a strong group of warriors who are willing to make the sacrifices needed to insure what happened back home, WILL NEVER happen here.
Freedom must be protected at all costs. Keep your head up, keep educating, and keep fighting. This movement has come so far in just a few short years. I’m proud of the progress we’ve made. They may win this battle, but we will win this war.
– Shalee via Facebook
🔥Now is the time for Idaho to get ready for our upcoming legislative session. 👉Become a member! It’s only $10 per year. Let’s be membership strong as we head to the capitol. 🙌🏻 We have bills getting prepared that need your support and we will have calls to action all session long. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/donate/ 👉Get connected! Our Natural Health Symposium is Sept 21st. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/nhs-2019/ 👉Donate! It takes money to fight medical tyranny and we need to raise funds. https://hfi.designbyparrish.com/donate/
What an amazing turn out in North Idaho today! So many brave moms and dads. I’m so thankful for all of you. Watching all of you fight for your babies today bring me to tears.In that roomful, only 1 person spoke for the “rules”. It was an employee of the system! All the rest were a united bunch! Great speeches!
Hari HeathI was very impressed by the competent knowledge of the subject so many had; how we came at it from so many angles without being redundant; one set of facts became backed up someone else’s direct experience and how resoundingly cohesive this group of individuals was. We couldn’t have done better with a producer and a script!
Public speaking can pretty nerve-wracking for many. But you all got up there and just spoke from your heart, respectfully but without mincing words. It was stressful and no one really wanted to do it but we do because there’s nothing we won’t do for our children. And we know if we don’t speak today, tomorrow may be too late.
This Saturday was a very sobering reminder to me of the cost some of our children have already paid and those who ultimately lost their lives, as I ran into my friend Shelly. Some of you may recognize her from Pilgrim’s. Her family paid the ultimate price, along w 3 other families in North Idaho and a total of 11 families between here and Spokane just in the same month her Vance died.
This is why we do what we do. For babies like Vance and so our children or anyone’s children never again have to suffer the devastating destruction that vaccines can cause.
This is Shelly’s story:
Can’t attend a hearing? YOU HAVE UNTIL THE END OF THE MONTH TO BE COUNTED!!
here’s a link to the email addresses – below a sample of copy and paste for vaccine mandates opposition. Add your own text (or don’t) your voice counts.
According to an article in Idahoednews – Health and Welfare is also getting emails on the issue, but in this case, the headcount is quite different. While 28 Idahoans argued against immunization rules, 62 Idahoans urged Health and Welfare to keep the rules in place, Nathan Brown of the Idaho Falls Post Register reported.
Let’s do this!! Do you agree that Idaho should have vaccine requirements = mandates?
Do you think that parents should be fully informed of exemptions available?
Do you think that it should take more than 12 people to decided the fate of 30,000 students to receive another shot of meningitis before graduation?
Do you think that they should be allowed to change the wording of the rules – to ‘student’ with the intent to include ADULT STUDENTS in their mandates?
Do you have 5 minutes to send an email?! Do you think you should make time?!
I OPPOSE IDAPA 16.02.15 and 16.02.11 Requirements for Immunizations
36 required school vaccinations
31 required daycare vaccines (by the age of 2)
These rules violate informed consent, bodily autonomy, parental rights, medical privacy, and doctor-patient privilege.These rules represent a clear violation of human rights as they go beyond the scope of the law and seek to coerce and bully parents into compliance. Forcing the injection of liability-free medical products into an individual in order to participate in education in public and private schools and participate in private business via daycares.
Rules 16.02.15 and 16.02.11 must be stricken or at very least amended to reflect a “recommendation” rather than a requirement/mandate. The Health and Welfare Department must be more transparent and specify that exemptions are available.
16.02.11 Meningitis for 12th graders for school year 2020/2021
Additional Meningitis vaccination for 12th grade students
This additional vaccine requirement was added for the 20-21 school year under the guise that it would protect potential college-bound students from the exceedingly rare disease that affects less than 400 individuals a year. The Health Department reports that LESS THAN 3 individuals annually in Idaho and NO reported students have been effected in the last decade. The CDC reports that 92% of the college students who got meningitis WERE VACCINATED with this vaccine. Not surprisingly, 99.9% of those who were in favor of the vaccine at public hearings stood to gain financially from the newest Idaho vaccine mandate.The parents of the 30,000 students a year who are now mandated to receive an additional vaccine are not being provided true Informed Consent. (Meningitis Facts)
Additional Vaccination Mandate must be stricken or at very least amended to reflect a “recommendation” rather than a requirement/mandate. The Health and Welfare Department must be more transparent and specify that exemptions are available.
We expect our schools to teach our children knowledge of reading and writing. We expect the campus to be free from bullying. We expect the schools to enforce the community standards of respect and telling the truth. And yet, when parents enroll their children into school these standards are ignored by administration and staff. Parents are lied to by omission which is lying. They are bullied and harassed. The full disclosure of the law is ignored. Citizens brought forth a bill that would require the health department and school administration to provide full disclosure of the law. This bill passed the House with a vote of 52 to 17. Yes, 17 representatives believed that coercion at the hands of the health department and schools is acceptable. ) However, due to the structure of our legislature ONE MAN stopped this bill from being heard in the Senate. The power of the Chairman of the Health Committee used his personal opinion in favor of vaccines to keep this informed consent bill from being put to a vote. Senator Fred Martin believes the out right lies of the marketing campaigns via the health department and the school’s administrative policies is appropriate.
One mom writes:
I was registering my son for kindergarten today (his only partial year of public school before he will be homeschooled). I noticed this passage and the way it was worded when I was filling out his registration paperwork. I came with his vaccine exemption form in hand already filled out, which they accepted. I was really bothered by the fact that we have the right to waive vaccines, and yet they write to parents that by law they have to have their vaccinations. This is wrong. They should say something like, “It is Idaho State Law that you must have complete immunization records or an Idaho School Immunization Exemption Form to register your child for school.”
I listened to moms coming in worried that they didn’t have vaccination records and the school never gave them the option to waive.
If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?
– Concerned Mom
Dear Senators and Representatives – If it is our right to waive, why is this not disclosed as part of proper informed consent?
A hearing last year to require school to give complete information on the law that includes vaccine exemptions for medical, religious and other reasons Senators advised that parents should try to inform one another. The vote against a measure of informed consent allows the school’s are allowed to deceive, lie, and bully parents by failing to inform parents of their full rights under Idaho statue.
The CITIZENS want schools to tell the truth, full disclosure. NO MORE BULLYING! This is outright coercing parents with inadequate information on the actual state statute. It should NOT be the responsibility of the citizen to inform one another of the schools deceiptful tatics. It should be the responsibility of the tax supported schools and state Health departments to be accountable to the LAW.
Why? Because school officials have said, their goal is increased vaccination rates. Our schools rank at the bottom of education for the United States. Our school system is failing our children. The focus of the school should be to improve knowledge, reading and math and sciences. They should NOT be involved in the medical affairs of families. These decisions should be left between doctor and parent and not be coerced by school officials.
WHY WOULD OUR POLITICIANS VOTE AGAINST CITIZENS INFORMED CONSENT?
HOUSE BILL 133
Amends existing law to require that complete information regarding immunization exemptions be given by daycare facilities and schools to parents or guardians enrolling children.
Parents have the right to vaccine exemption with a signed statement from parents. (PRINTABLE COPY)
To Whom It May Concern:
Persuant to Idaho Code 39-4802(2) (Title 39, Chapter 48, Section 2, Number 2) and The Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164, I object to the vaccine reporting requirements and invoke my right to be exempt from the provisions of 39-4801 Idaho Code for personal and family reasons and ‘other grounds’ in regard to and on behalf of my minor child, (Child’s First and Last Name).
This statement supersedes any and all previous forms or statements made in regard to this matter.
___________________________________ (Parent First and Last Name) Parent /Guardian /Custodian
Idaho Code 39-4802(2): Any minor child whose parent or guardian has submitted a signed statement to school officials stating their objections on religious or other grounds shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.
SCHOOLS BULLY PARENTS! This is NOT a isolated incident. Please see coercive material given to parents across the state.
It’s another example of lying by omission. In fact it’s just lying. “No child shall attend school without proof of immunization status” is a lie. They are funded with public money, State law applies to them.
In an enrollment package for a Charter School
At the bottom of a report card in Payette
At an enrollment fair where they had a SHOT CLINIC…but when asked where the exemption forms were located – parents are required to talk with a nurse before having access to one.
