Tag: violation

  • Health District Wants Police to Enforce Their Orders

    December 4 at 5:15 pm the Board of Central District Health will vote to change the current health advisory in place to a health ORDER with enforcement. Instead of “strong recommendations” to wear a face covering, physical distance from others, limit occupancy in businesses, and avoid social gatherings, it would now be an ORDER in all four counties within this health district this includes Ada, Elmore, Valley, and Boise Counties by restricting movement, travel, small businesses and commerce, religious services and in-home gatherings.

    Violation of or failure to comply with this Order could constitute a
    misdemeanor punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. Idaho Code § 39-419.

    Idaho Code 39-414 is vague and very broad in granting powers and duties to this Board. From that section of Code:

    1. To administer and enforce all state and district health laws, regulations, and standards.
    2. To do all things required for the preservation and protection of the public health and preventive health, and such other things delegated by the director of the state department of health and welfare or the director of the department of environmental quality and this shall be the authority for the director(s) to so delegate.

    Please note the use of the word ENFORCE. The Health District wants to impose restrictions that are enforced by our law enforcement and criminal legal systems, which typically operate by criminalization and punishment.

    Please also note the use of the phrase “DO ALL THINGS required for the preservation and protection of the public health….”

    The people within this health district must stand for freedom and demand our rights be respected. We must reject this advice being changed to an order with enforcement. We must stand together and strongly reject our law enforcement officers being turned on the people and ordered to enforce tyranny on us. We must work to change the broad powers vested in this Board, for they are being used to destroy businesses, livelihoods, and our community.

    The CDH Board of Health will consider moving the current Public Health Advisory to a Public Health Order for all 4 counties (Ada, Boise, Elmore, & Valley) at a special meeting on Friday, Dec. 4 at 5:15 pm.

    A draft of the potential Public Health Order

    EMAIL THE BOARD & Submit Public Comment. They will only accept public comment until Thursday at 5:15 pm

    Ted.Epperly@FMRIdaho.org,
    dlachiondo@adacounty.id.gov,
    lach4ada@gmail.com,
    rduke@cdh.idaho.gov,
    rstirm@co.boise.id.us,
    MBlanksma@house.idaho.gov,
    jmatblank@hotmail.com,
    ba-nettleton@hotmail.com,
    ehasbrouck@co.valley.id.us,
    jane@fhcboise.com,
    boh@cdh.idaho.gov

    Submit Written Comments: If your comments are in response to an agenda item for a specific meeting date, please note that comments must be received 24-hours in advance of the applicable meeting to allow for routing and board member review. All messages will be shared with the Board and included in public record.

    • Email: boh@cdh.idaho.gov
    • Mail to: CDH Board of Health, Attn: Russ Duke, 707 N. Armstrong Place, Boise, ID 83704

     View Meetings: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4LJ1BM5Jv3zczecnYkXarw/

     In-Person: CDH Office, 707 N. Armstrong Place, Boise 83704 | Syringa & White Pine meeting rooms. See important In-Person Meeting Information & Protocol Guidance in the 2020 | Public Meeting Notice section below.

  • Kootenai Health Director Threatens to Withhold Treatment from those Who Disagree Politically

    Dr. Robert Burnett the Director of Surgical Services at Kootenai Health is proposing an alarming violation of medical ethics in his publish opinion post at the Bonner County Daily Bee. He is threatening to withhold treatment from individuals who politically disagree with him. This is extremely unethical and in doing so, likely criminal.

    Threatening to withhold health care from anyone, singling out and threatening public officials by directing staff at Kootenai Medical Center and encouraging “all of his co-workers” to ensure care is not provided should be grounds for termination of Burnett and litigation for Burnett and KMC. 

    Andrew Blancard – Redoubt News

    Join us in reporting him this doctor to the State Medical Board of Ethics and complain to Kootenai’s Health Board.

    FILE AREPORT

    WRITE A REVIEW OF THE DOCTOR

    FACEBOOK REVIEW OF HIS PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT

    “I realize that the pandemic is not much of a concern to those uneducated people who believe this threat is a “hoax” or “overblown,” but I want you to know that in the unlikely but possible event that either you or Sheriff Wheeler contract the coronavirus, and in the less likely event that you will require hospitalization, and even less likely but possible event that you would require a ventilator, that I, and all of my co-workers take comfort in knowing that, because of your behavior, you have essentially relinquished your claim to any of these potentially scare resources. It’s probably for the better that a ventilator go to a health care provider anyway,”

    Here’s the opinion piece written by BY Dr. BURNETT

    Opinions are opinions but oaths are oaths.  I am disgusted at the recent comments made by Dr. Robert Burnett, Director of Surgical Services, Kootenai Heart Health Center.   While Burnett is certainly entitled to his own opinions based on his knowledge of medicine, so are Rep. Heather Scott and Sheriff Daryl Wheeler, based on their knowledge of lawmaking and law enforcement.  But Burnett put his bloated arrogance on full display as he blatantly violated, in writing, the Hippocratic Oath he took to graduate medical school and become a licensed doctor in Idaho or anywhere in the USA.

    Andrew Blancard – Redoubt News


    Here is the link to print off and file a complaint with the state.
    https://bom.idaho.gov/BOMPortal/LINKS/discipline/IDBOM_complaint_form.pdf

    HFI’s Response to Dr. Burnett

    Fact: While there is no doubt people are ill and many have died, Coronavirus has proven to be far less deadly than authorities have warned. Moreover, there is debate about whether the virus has been properly identified as Koch’s Postulates, protocols used since the 19th century to identify and determine the pathogenicity of an infectious agent have not been met. Additionally, according to the inventor of the PCR test, the test being used to putatively identify the virus the PCR test cannot be used to diagnose. Although it can identify a minute amount of genetic material such as a virus, it does not prove that that genetic material causes any disease nor that sufficient quantities of that material are present in numbers large enough to cause disease.

    https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/home/showdocument?id=16826

    Fact: The curves for cases were declining before stay at home orders were put into place. The orders are not responsible for any declines being observed. https://www.professorhinkley.com/blog/why-is-oregon-still-on-lock-down

    Fact: CDC is not a public entity and takes money from the pharmaceutical industry. 

    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/cdc-is-a-private-organization-not-government/   
    Moreover, CDC grossly exaggerated the swine flu outbreak in 2009 and cannot be trusted. 

    https://greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/no-its-the-medical-military-industrial-complex/

    Fact: Models are not facts, they’re models. They are projections based on a myriad of assumptions that may be wrong as evidenced by the UK’s Imperial College of London whose models on coronavirus deaths were off by a factor of 50 when one excludes those who would have died during the year in any event. https://www.dailywire.com/news/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-admits-he-was-wrong-drastically-revises-model


    Fact: No punch of any sort reached your face. We are all exposed to trillions of bugs in every moment of every day. What determines whether someone falls ill or suffers complications from an illness relates to how well nourished they are, how well-rested, how much stress, whether they exercise. No one touched you and you alone are responsible for taking care of your immune system.


    People who disagree about the dangers of coronavirus or any virus are not uneducated simply because they disagree with you. 

    response by Leslie Manookian
    Executive Board of Health Freedom Idaho
    Co Producer of the Greater Good

  • Oregon Proposes Strictest Vaccine Mandate Law in the U.S.

    Oregon –HB 3063 will eliminate all non-medical vaccine exemptions for school attendance in Oregon (K-12, child/day care, churches with child/day care, and colleges) and prohibits “sharing space with other individuals” at any school related event or activity.

     Oregon homeschool associations OCEANetwork determined that HB 3063 would force homeschooled children in some co-ops to be vaccinated. This bill will impact more than 31,521 students in addition to preschool/daycare and college students and includes those with IEPs.

    Exempt in Oregon means the student didn’t receive ALL 31 of 31 required vaccines for school attendance. Missing even one shot – means the elimination of access public and private, parochial education and the resources of school-related events and activities.

    Medical exemptions will be subject to Oregon Health Authority approval. Doctors can easily be overruled. Whatever your stance on vaccinations is, this bill is a overreach of government into parents’ medical freedom to make choices on their children’s behalf.  As of April 2, the bill sits in the Ways and Means committee for voting.

    “Our office received thousands of emails and hundreds of calls opposing HB 3063.  “This legislation sets a dangerous precedent. One where parents are coerced into medical procedures or risk losing the right for their child to receive an education. By passing this policy, government is choosing to follow fear over freedom, and it is an alarming precedent to set,” said Representative Boles.

    Listen to this excellent recent podcast (jump to 10 minutes, just following the break). The entire second half of the interview is on discussion around HB 3063 with State Senator Dallas Heard. Thank you Senator Heard for speaking up about some of the many concerns around this bill! 

    Here’s a summary of some of his points: 

    Two opponents, infectious diseases and a government that is so arrogant that when it looks at us as citizens it says, “we have the vote… we have the moral high ground. So it does not matter you think. We are going to do to you whatever we need to – because we think its right.” 

    Get out a history book. It never ends well when the government forces people against their will. 

    Senator Heard points out the manipulation the pharmaceutical companies on US citizens is extensive; Opioid addiction, $400 epi-pens, Over charging US citizens by 4x the amount compared to other countries for treatment protocols. 

    I don’t understand how the pharmaceutical companies can be the kin of Satan on about every topic you can come up with except when it comes to mandated vaccines. Then they are saints all of a sudden. 

    The CDC facts and statistics show that the trends do NOT suggest we have any kind of issue here. If anything its flat and declining. 

    HB 3063 is being pushed by legislators who claim there is a public health emergency, when in fact, vaccination rates in Oregon have remained constant for over 20 years. Oregon has extremely high MMR rates across all counties. In 2018, 95.8% of Oregon children K-12 had two doses of MMR.

    The Emergency Clause is a mechanism by which Oregon legislators can prevent bills from ever going to citizens for a vote. There is no emergency.

    Oregon Doctors Speaks Out Against Vaccine Mandates

    My family members have been injured and my patients have been injured.

    We do not yet know the precise reason certain individuals are susceptible to vaccine injury, but to say vaccine injury doesn’t occur is incorrect. Yet the pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable for these injuries. Where is the justice in that? Making tax payers pay millions of dollars for these injuries is wrong.

    How can we mandate the administration of a product that may cause harm all the while making the public pay for the damage? What other industry is exempt from litigation when things go wrong?

    Perhaps most importantly, we must acknowledge that government is overstepping its boundaries here and interjecting itself into the private relationship of a doctor and her patient. Knowing a patient’s full medical, family and social history puts the doctor in the best position to determine how to care for her patient. Individualized medicine is what will heal our nation.
    Dr. Leslie Hamlett  <read the full letter to the Legislators>


    But after 15 years of research, I have evidence-based, scientifically grounded concerns about the current CDC vaccine schedule. Part of that concern comes from interviewing dozens of Oregon families and medical doctors who have seen health declines in children after vaccines.

    People don’t realize that we’re requiring nearly four times as many vaccines as we have in the past. They also don’t realize that vaccine injury is compensated by the federal government. The vaccine court has paid out over $4 billion to vaccine-injured Americans since 1988. (source: https://www.hrsa.gov/…/vaccine-compensation/data/monthly-st…).

    HB 3063 seeks to bar children from school if they’re missing just one vaccine. I oppose H.B. 3063. I believe every Oregonian who takes the time to understand the nuances of this issue will also oppose it. Let’s educate the public about the importance of vaccines, not try to coerce compliance by taking away children’s access to education.

    Jennifer Margulis, PhD
    Ashland


    Testimony presented by the medical community requiring mandatory vaccines for all families during hearings was mixed, with agency public health experts supporting it, and individual family practitioners, pediatricians, and parents pushing back on this sweeping legislation.” Representative Boyes

    This mom has only 24 vaccines and wants to know why her children “need” 72 to be considered vaccinated? She vaccinates and makes healthy and judicious choices about which ones her four children need. Grandma came from the generation where you could count the number recommended on one hand. Are we doing too many too soon? Why take away parents’ right to choose? There is no emergency. “My children deserve an education no matter what choices my family makes.” source

    Unvaccinated Are NOT the Source of Measles Outbreaks

    All current measles outbreaks have been traced to international travelers. “US measles outbreaks are linked to travelers who brought measles back from other countries such as Israel and Ukraine, where large measles outbreaks are occurring.” https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html If the Oregon Legislature was concerned with protecting the children of Oregon, they would implement a system to safeguard against international travelers arriving with fever and illness. 

    • HB 3063 is completely devoid of protective measures to prevent future outbreaks. 
    • HB 3063 does not respect religious freedom. 
    • HB 3063 does not uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. 
    • HB 3063 does not provide a free and public (nor paid and private) education for all American children. 
    • HB 3063 does not follow the Nuremberg Code regarding coerced medical experiments. 
    • HB 3063 does not protect the education of thousands of Oregon students with a federally protected IEP. 
    • HB 3063 does not return the taxes that Oregonians are mandated to pay towards the public education that will be denied to excluded and segregated children. 

    To mandate vaccinations, violates the constitution and the rights of parents to make health choices for their children. Even IF vaccinations were totally effective, it is still the right of parents to choose. Oregon Citizen Lobby

    Action you can take to protect medical freedom and oppose medical mandates:

    RESOURCES: 

    https://jennifermargulis.net/oregon-doctors-oppose-medical-mandates/

    Oregon Citizen Lobby

    Ocean Network freedom Watch Team

    Oregonians for Medical Freedom

    NVIC Advocacy